What's the Best Workflow to Add Footage to Existing H.264 files?

I have some ready-made clips for the Internet already spec'd to H.264 at about 640x480. The audio is AAC. I would like to add bumpers to the beginning and end of these clips. Would you simply import them into FCP, make a 640x480 timeline add the bumpers, render and export? Or, is there a better way?
I ran a test where I imported the H.264 file into FCP, added my bumpers and re-rendered. The results were not that bad however I'm getting interlacing issues when uploading to Vimeo. I tried using 'Progressive' in Compressor to rid of the of the lines but no luck. Then I took a look at the'De-Interlace' filter in FCP but it appears that the original H.264 file is what contains the lines and the filter doesn't remove them. Any ideas. Here's the result on Vimeo:
http://vimeo.com/1893904
In case you're wondering, I no longer have the original, 720x480, SD files. The 640x480, H.264 is all I have to work with.

Open your main movie and its bumpers in QuickTime Player.
Make sure the Timeline on your main movie is sitting at frame 1 then click your intro bumper to bring it to the front.
Press cmd & A keys (select all). Press cmd & C keys (copy). Press Option, cmd and V keys (Add to Movie).
Move the timeline of your main movie to the last frame then click your outro (is that a word?) bumper to bring it to the front.
Press cmd & A keys (select all). Press cmd & C keys (copy). Press Option, cmd and V keys (Add to Movie).
Save As... (makes a new file - better than overwriting the old version.)
Quick and dirty, but it gets the job done.

Similar Messages

  • Best Workflow to Add Footage to Existing H.264 files?

    I have some ready-made clips for the Internet already spec'd to H.264 at about 640x480. The audio is AAC. I would like to add bumpers to the beginning and end of these clips. Would you simply import them into FCP, make a 640x480 timeline add the bumpers, render and export? Or, is there a better way?
    I ran a test where I imported the H.264 file into FCP, added my bumpers and re-rendered. The results were not that bad however I'm getting interlacing issues when uploading to Vimeo. I tried using 'Progressive' in Compressor to rid of the of the lines but no luck. Then I took a look at the'De-Interlace' filter in FCP but it appears that the original H.264 file is what contains the lines and the filter doesn't remove them. Any ideas. Here's the result on Vimeo:
    http://vimeo.com/1893904
    In case you're wondering, I no longer have the original, 720x480, SD files. The 640x480, H.264 is all I have to work with.

    Try this.
    1. Encode one of your bumpers to the same specs (at least the same video/audio codec and frame size) as your ready-made clips.
    2. Open up QuickTime Pro
    3. Open both one of your ready-made clips and one of your bumpers
    4. Copy the bumper and paste it in front of your ready-made H.264 clip
    5. Save as a self-contained QuickTime file, and try uploading it to Vimeo
    As for deinterlacing (and downscaling), have you tried implementing frame controls?
    http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=7309534#7309534

  • How do I delete music from my iPhone and what is the best way to add and delete music?

    How do I delete music from my iPhone and what is the best was to add and delete music to the iPhone?

    See Here...
    iPhone User Guide
    and here
    http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/syncing/

  • Why jpeg file exported from Aperture with 300 dpi's it opens with 72 dpi's on PS ( image size)? I've tried several combinations and all give different results. And I am confused on what is the best workflow for me.

    Ok.
    My workflow is
    RAW > Aperture Library > export jpeg high resolution 300 dpi's > one file on PS > edit > Save us jpeg. The I realised that files from PS were being save in a smaller size from the ones exported form Aperture. That is when I went o see <image size> on PS and files were with 72.
    Since ten I've trying different things
    1. Aperture > export as PSD > open on PS > edit > Save us jpeg = small file (around 15 MB)
    2. Aperture > export as jpeg high resolution 300 dpi's > open on PS > CHANGE dpi's to 300 on <image size> edit > Save us jpeg = big file (Huge, actually)
    What am I doing wrong? Would someone give me guidance and tell me what is the best workflow, considering I edit photos to deliver to my clients and I shall give them 300 dpi's.
    Thank you

    This is a known Aperture issue: Problem with Aperture 3.6 preset exports. | Apple Support Communities
    Benjamin

  • What's the best way to transfer footage from a Sony miniDVD camcorder?

    What's the best way to transfer footage from a Sony miniDVD camcorder?

    Do not use "mini" DVD's in any slot loading DVD drive.
    Buy a cheap "tray loading" external DVD drive and attach it to your Mac.

  • What is the best way to add text to an image

    I used the draw ap div to add text to an image.  will that cause any problems?  If so, what is the best way to add text to an image?  Thanks!

    APDivs will kill your design unless you fully understand the css behind the scenes and plan accordingly. They really are completely unnecessary in the vast majority of situations.
    An easy way to add "web text over an image" would be to use the background-image attribute in css for a standard <div> tag, then just add the text within that same <div>.
    Something like this in the css (if you are using a 300x300 pixel image)...
    #yourdiv {
         background-image:url(yourpic.jpg);
         width:300px;
         height:300px;
    And then this in the html...
    <div id="yourdiv">Your text here</div>
    You would then position the <div> using css margins, floats and padding. Using position:absolute (APDivs) is typically something that will blow your design to pieces if the viewer changes their browser settings.

  • What is the best way to add hard disk space to macbook pro?

    I'm running out of disk space on my macbook pro. What is the best way to add disk space?

    another way of doing it is to replace your hard drive with a larger one.
    if you're technically capable, it takes 10 minutes for the swap and an hour minimum to clone your hard drive or do a data transfer.  all depends on how much data there is to trandfer or to clone.
    good luck.

  • What is the best way to add libraries to a project?

    What is the best way to add technologies to ADF? For example log4j. Or does the embedded logger have log4j features?

    HI,
    Hope helpful
    http://technology.amis.nl/blog/8380/manage-jdeveloper-external-libraries

  • What is the Best Way to add a shopping cart?

    What is the best way to add a shopping cart?
    Thanks.

    See that field at the top right that says "Search Forums"? Try Dreamweaver shopping cart. You'll get a lot of answers.

  • What is the best way to use wi-fi to transfer pdf files from an ipad to a mac mini, not using an internet, just wi-fi.

    What is the best way to use wi-fi to transfer pdf files from an ipad to a mac mini, not using an internet, just wi-fi?

    If the Mac use Lion (10.7) you can use Airdrop for that.
    With Mac's not using Lion you may set up a computer to computer (ad hoc) connection.
    How to --> http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.6/en/8339.html
    Lupunus

  • What is the best workflow procedure for importing DV SP 16x9 footage into FCP7 and then exporting the best quality 16x9 to standard DVD so that it looks great (or at least good) on a 50" Samsung LCD TV ?????? Please help! anybody?? Thanks!

    We are using a Sony HDV-Z7U camera for acquisition. We recently recorded an event using the camera's non HD capabilities. We set the camera to record "DV SP" 16x9 settings on both Mini-DV tape and CF card.
    To import the DV SP footage into FCP7 we chose the "DV NTSC anamorphic" setting in the log and transfer settings window. After a successful transfer from the CF card (the CF card held approximately 83 minutes) we checked the size of the file and found it to be 16 Gigs! Why so big? An 83 miniDV tape shot in SD should easily fit on a standard 4.7 gig MPEG2 DVD.
    We need to burn DVDs of this show - we sent it to compressor and got horrible quality.
    What is the best setting to use in FCP7's log and transfer settings window to import DV SP 16x9 standard def. footage and what is the best method for exporting for outputting this footage to DVD that preserves the original quality of the DV SP footage?? Anyone? Many thanks

    > Why so big? An 83 miniDV tape shot in SD should easily fit on a standard 4.7 gig MPEG2 DVD.
    No it doesn't. DV is 13GB per hour.
    In any case, a Video DVD uses the MPEG 2 codec, not DV.
    >What is the best setting to use in FCP7's log and transfer settings window to import DV SP 16x9 standard def.
    DV NTSC anamorphic.
    >what is the best method for exporting for outputting this footage to DVD...
    Use the Compressor DVD preset "Best Quality 90 mins".
    >...that preserves the original quality of the DV SP footage?
    Not going to happen, you are compressing by a factor of 1:4. Shooting as HDV would have given you better quality material to start with. DV is at the bottom end of the scale.

  • Whats the best workflow with REDCODE Footage?

    Hi,
    I Go an work on a Red code project. A Music clip shot on the RED ONE. I Was wondering: what is the best way to work with this 4k footage. There are much shoots in 100 frames who i need to ramp. So a fast editing way would be nice...
    - Do i need to use the reference quick times from the camera?
    - Do i need to trans code al the footage to SD and edit it, then before the compositing relink it to the 4k footage?
    What is the best option? This is the first time i work with 4k from the RED ONE.
    THANKS!
    David Douglas

    Well, I'd scan this forum here, for one:
    http://www.reduser.net/forum/index.php
    #2, don't work with 4K images natively...transcode to another format, like DVCPRO HD or other format and work from those, then conform to 4K when you are done...most likely on another system that can handle them, like SCRATCH.
    But that forum is where to look for the answers.
    Shane

  • What's the best workflow for Home Movie Importing and Enjoying?

    I'm new to iMovie (and the mac) and have started importing all my home movies from my camcorder into iMovie. I quickly realized that movies take a huge amount of disk space and it may or may not be reasonable to import all my movies and keep them on the hard disk in .dv format. At 12GB/Hour I would need 1.2 Terabytes of storage (plus backup). If that is the best workflow, i'm happy to invest in a few terabytes of storage and back up. But before I do that, I want to check to see if there is a different workflow I should follow given my use case.
    Here is my use case:
    I have 100 hours of 8mm and miniDV tapes already and plan to continue creating more.
    I want to import them all into the iMac for ease of organization, searching for the clips of interest, and watch them either on my iMAC and also on my TV (via TIVO).
    I may do some editing, but this is not a big priority for me at this time. I may do more editing in the distant future when I have more time. My editing for now will be limited to rejecting portions of clips I don't want.
    I plan to watch the movies from my iMac on my TV via my TIVO (i've already ordered the Roxio Toast software that I understand I need, per the Tivo web site).
    The final piece of my use case is back-up. I'd prefer to back up my movies on disk this way I maintain any editing i've done in case of a disk failure. Depending on what video format is recommended, this may bump me into a RAID multi-terabyte system as both working and automatic backup?
    Here are my questions:
    Should I maintain my event library in .dv format? (and bite the bullet on the storage)
    Or is the .dv format intended only for temporary editing and users are expected to compress into another format after editing? if so, what format and which tool is recommended? (keeping in mind that I want to view the clips via Tivo and Roxio/Toast).
    If I need to byte the bullet and invest in storage, my quick math suggests I'll need about 2 terabytes for the library and 2 more for back up for a total of 4 terabytes!?. Is a RAID system recommended for this? (I was surprised that the Apple store did not carry such a system, so perhaps that is not the best option). What would you recommend?
    Anyone out there with a similar use case? I know I've asked a lot of questions here. I'd appreciate any recommendations you may have, even if you cant answer all of them.
    Thank you.

    I am in a similar mode, though about half as much existing DV footage.
    +Should I maintain my event library in .dv format? (and bite the bullet on the storage)+
    Short answer, yes; long answer:
    I did "bite the bullet" since 1T drives are at or just over $100. I'm using a MacBook Pro so I bought an 2 port eSATA card for my cardbus slot ($34), and a 1T eSATA/Firewire/USB drive ($119). I don't plan to "back up" as I am not going to get rid of my Mini DV tapes/vhs/analog tapes, etc. Those will be in an off-site dark cool closet elsewhere. I don't want to do RAID or such as it still puts everything in the same drive unit, in the same location. Basically I'm splitting my video import to two different physical drives. So if lightning, thieves, personal incompetence or whatever strikes, there's more chance it'll only affect one of the drives. I've thought about a Drobo, which you might consider. It is unique device that offers a spin on RAID that offers some advantages.
    Everything I read here on these boards suggests that it is best to grab the source video in the original format whenever possible. Since storage is cheap, makes sense to me.
    It is likely you wouldn't compress your video unless you were going to edit it. For example if you wanted to make a video of the kids growing up to give the relatives you'd likely end up compressing to burn them a dvd. You would compress if you were going to use MobileMe, YouTube, etc. to post some footage. Whether you watch the video from home, or output to DVD for others, or post online, at least you'll have the source video in it's best possible original format to work with.
    This is an aside, but might be useful, I imported one tape at a time, let iM09 create a new event and split per each day. THen I renamed every event based on what the content was before doing the next tape. This really helps later on once yo realize you have a hard drive with 50 hours + of everything in your life on it. I included the year in the name in some way, for example, John's wedding 1994, Hawaii 2000, Hawaii 2004. Then I ended up drag/dropping Hawaii to one event.

  • What is the best workflow for Final Cut Pro X across multiple computers?

    I travel on a team that is in a different location every week, so all of our video editing has to be fairly moble. We have 3 macbook pros and would like to use final cut X on all of them. What would be the best workflow for us all to work on the same project and sync it across the computers? (eg, one of us editing the footage, one editing the sound, one working on visual effects?)

    My first question would be how well 5.1 would work with SL. People have reported problems.
    As far as cameras are concerned, I would guess most any tape-based camera would work and so much depends on the kind of projects you work on that I wouldn't want to start guessing at your needs.
    If you want broad access to tapeless and advanced formats try to locate and purchase an upgrade disk to 6 or 7.
    Good luck.
    Russ

  • What is the best way to add external C++ code to LabView 6.1?

    I have various C++ class-based DLL's written with Visual Studio 6.0 and wish
    to create instances of these C++ classes and call their methods in LabView
    6.1. What is the best way to do this?
    It seems based on the little reading I have done that there are two choices:
    1. Wrap the C++ class as a simple COM control and use LabView's COM based
    VIs to create a COM object and access the methods of various interfaces.
    2. Wrap the C++ class methods as C functions and a "constructor" and
    "destructor" C function to create and destroy an instance of the class. Then
    use LabView's DLL call support.
    Which is best? What direction is LabView going to take that better supports
    the notion of C++ class libraries?
    Thanks,
    Te
    rry

    You could also try using a CIN. This is a tool that LabVIEW provides for interfacing with external code.
    The CINTools libraries of LabVIEW allow you to embed compiled C code into a particular Virtual Instrument (VI) using a CIN.
    In order for LabVIEW to be capable of calling compiled functions of C from a running VI, the code must be loaded and unloaded into memory at the same time as the VI code itself. LabVIEW uses object code in the form of a .lsb file which is generated by the C compiler from the C source code using the ntlvsbm.mak file. This ntlvsbm.mak file is included in the CINtools directory in the LabVIEW folder. You also must create another .mak file which includes parameter definitions for the ntlvsbm.mak file and also includes a call to the LabVIEW .mak file.
    The generic documentation for CINs only explains how to use them to call C compiled code from a LabVIEW VI. It shows several development environments such as Visual C++, but in essence it only allows the user to create .lsb files out of plain C source code ( .c ) through C compilers on those environments.
    The question now is how can I create .lsb files from C++ native source code using a C++ compiler. Furthermore, how can I create a .lsb file from several C++ source code files (.cpp) and make calls to C++ functions from a VI using CINs? The following explains how to do this:
    1) Drop a Code Interface Node (from the Advanced Subpalette of the Functions Palette) into the LabVIEW VI. Make sure to wire the inputs.
    2) Right-click on the CIN and choose "Create.c File...", then in the file dialog box specify a "name.cpp" file name. (very important: use .cpp extension)
    3) Then create a name.mak makefile (text file) and add the following lines :
    name=name_of_cpp_file_without_the_extension
    type=CIN
    cinlibraries=Kernel32.lib
    CINTOOLSDIR=path_to_cintools_directory
    !include <$(CINTOOLSDIR)\ntlvsb.mak>
    4) Go into Visual C++ and File>Open and open the .mak file. You can even Add the name.cpp file to the project to make it easier to edit. Select that name.cpp or open it as a text file in NotePad or and edit the prototypes of the CIN MgErr functions as shown below, adding extern "C" at the beginning of the line. extern "C" CIN MgErr CINRun(float64 *INPUT);3) Select Build.exe to create the "name.lsb" file. To import the .lsb into LabVIEW, right-click on the CIN and choose "Load Code Resource...". Then, choose the name.lsb file and it is ready to run!
    If you want to use several C++ source code files with .cpp extensions, then compile them in Visual C++ and link them to name.cpp and create a .lsb by modifying the name.mak as follows:
    name=name_of_cpp_file_without_the_extension
    otherobj=other_cpp_files_BUT_USING_.obj_extension
    type=CIN
    cinlibraries=Kernel32.lib
    CINTOOLSDIR=path_to_cintools_directory
    !include <$(CINTOOLSDIR)\ntlvsbm.mak>
    It's worth a try? I have also heard of using clusters to represent classes, so you could check that out.
    J.R. Allen

Maybe you are looking for