Which is a better option : VO on DB View or a VO with two EOs

I have 2 tables:
ITEMS_BASE and ITEMS_TL ( contains all translatable column of base table: ITEM_BASE).
What is better option for me:
1. TO create a DB View on top of ITEMS_BASE & ITEMS_TL and then create my VO on the DB View OR
2. Create 2 EOs on ITEMS_BASE and ITEMS_TL and create my VO on these 2 EOs.
Please also explain reason behind selection of your choice.
regards -Anuj

Jdev ver : 11.1.1.4
Use Case:
I want to display a rule message in the language as per users local. Only rule name & rule description is a translatable column so i have kept it into separate table.
Table design:
Table name : RULE_B
Columns : PlantCd, ModuleCd, IsRuleApplicable, Value
Example data : 101, safety, Y, 5
Table name : RULE_T
Columns : PlantCd, ModuleCd, RuleName, RuleDesc, Lang
Example data : 101, safety, 'Minimum Observation required', 'Total number of observation required per site', 'EN'
101, safety, 'garbage input', 'garbage input', 'gr'
So i have 2 choices here. either I should create 2 EOs on RULE_B and RULE_T and make my VO on these 2 EOs Or
create an updatable DB View comprising RULE_B and RULE_T and create my VO on the DB View.

Similar Messages

  • CSM Redundancy : FT or HSRP +FT .. Which is the better option?

    Hi,
    I would like to know for redundancy between CSMs which is the better option FT or HSRP with FT.. and why ?
    Regards
    Kas

    The CSM does not run HSRP.
    So your only option is FT failover.
    Gilles.

  • Which is the better option?

    Hey, I'm looking at getting a new mac but I'm not sure what's the better option. My choice right now is between the base 21.5 inch iMac or the Mac mini ( $799 model), and my main use for it would be recording instruments, music production, and movies / netflix. The 21.5 inch Mac would only give me 8gb of ram, whereas the Mac mini I'd instantly be able to upgrade to 16gb. Another bonus to the mac mini is that I can hook it up to whatever screen I want including my TV for movies.Also, the firewire on the mac mini would be extremely useful as some of the higher quality recording interfaces use firewire. And from what I understand I can also add a SSD to the mac mini? For these reasons I'm leaning towards the Mac mini but I've been recommended by representatives at apple to get the iMac as it's more powerful supposedly, so I'm not sure which one would be better. I know the iMac has a dedicated graphics card vs the integrated hd 4000 on the Mac mini, but I'm not exactly sure how that affects me for what I plan on using the computer for. I'd have to buy a monitor and mouse + keyboard for the mac mini, so it ends up costing me the same as the base model iMac. Any suggestions/ opinions would be appreciated, thanks.

    I would recommend getting the 16GB iMac. If money is an issue then consider using Apples refurbished store, there is no downside to buying from it as they sell current machine, the products have the same warranty as a new machine, and are eligible for AppleCare.
    Because you did not compelete a profile we have no idea where on the planet you are located. To find the US refurb store click:
    http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals

  • Creating default Row which one is better option

    hi,
    for creating dummy row in ViewObject which one is better and appropriate option..
    1) CreateInsert as default activity
    2) Creating row in Create method of ViewObjectImpl
    Regards
    Kiran
    Edited by: Kiran S on Aug 26, 2010 4:38 AM

    Kiran,
    CreateInsert is an action that is exposed via a data control. If you invoke this action, it will call the Create method of your View Object, so your question really doesn't make sense. If you need to have a row created and inserted into the row set of a VO, then using the CreateInsert action in a task flow will work just fine.
    John

  • Which is a better option url iview or bsp iview?

    Hi all,
    We have so set of BSP applications to be integrated in the portal. Our requirement is that the BSP application has to be stateless. Could any one suggest us which one would be the best option (BSP iview or URL iview) along with the pros and cons.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Gauri Gosavi.

    Hi!
    BSPs should always be integrated into the portal as BSP iViews. Whether a BSP application is stateful or stateless is never decided by the portal but by the BSP application. If you want to avoid that the portal takes over the session management then do not use the parameter sap-syscmd=nocookie whithin the definition of the BSP iView.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Volker

  • Which is a better option to write to an Excel file?

    Back from the crypt...
    I googled for APIs to write to an Excel file and I stumbled upon JExcelAPI and Jakarta POI. I am not sure which one to use; both are equally confusing.
    Could anyone tell me which I should opt for? I just want your opinion so that I can start reading the documentation straightaway. Reading docs for both would be rather a waste of time IMO.
    I am open to more suggestions.
    Thanks
    UW

    Great to find that someone makes use of Google!
    Personally, I find Jakarta POI better. It has a really HorribleSpreadSheetFormat called HSSF, which I find pretty good. And there's a quick guide to write simple code for starting off.
    BTW, I never tried JExcelAPI.
    x

  • Which is the better option for using windows on mac ...parallel or vm ware fusion

    i want to use c# ,.net, c++ , on my macbook pro ....which software i should purchase parallel or vmware fusion

    They both work well. I like Fusion. Others like Parallels. Still others like VirtualBox.
    They all have free trials, VirtualBox is a free product, so try them for yourself and stick with the one that works best for you.
    I opted to install Windows using Boot Camp Assistant.

  • Which one is better, regarding performance point of view.

    Hi friends,
    I have a report, which has 10 columns.
    Now in order to pull data for all 10 columns, i need to access 8 tables.
    Ex.. open ref_cursor for
    select col1, col2, col3,.. col10
    from table1, table2, table3.. table8
    now i use 3 of those tables for getting column2.
    Is it better to call another function (which returns this value) to pull this column2 or is it better to just join the tables to get this column?
    Does using a function decrease the performance ?
    Thank you
    Jack

    I would say try to construct the query using just SQL if at all possible. If you are attempting to do procedural operations on the data that cant be achieved through standard SQL (via case statements and the like), you probably don't have much of a choice other than to using a function or procedure. At any rate, there really isn't enough information to tell you which is better. My process for designing programs, jobs, reports, or queries tends to follow the same process when I am working solo:
    1. Outline what I want on paper
    2. Outline how to get it on paper
    3. Create a rough draft in pseudo code
    4. Write the actual code
    5. Verify that I am getting consistent and correct results
    6. Trace the job, program, or query in the database using a 10046 trace or, If it is pl/sql, profile it using DBMS_PROFILER
    7. For 10046, I profile the trace file using a profiler of some sort (usually not tkprof unless I am working with a single statement)
    8. Review the profile for issues, bugs, or poorly performing queries
    I basically use the response time profiling methodology (I like this text for response time optimization techniques: Optimizing Oracle Performance, Millsap/Holt, Oreilly 2003) to identify the issues. If I determine the SQL is the issue, it is time to break out a harness tool (a tool that captures statement level execution statistics) to help me test alternatives. After I have tuned the query to my satisfaction, I repeat steps 5-8.
    Please note, this is a very broad overview of my personal process and may not meet your needs. There are plenty of other considerations when designing or troubleshooting when performance improvement is the goal.

  • T440s vs. T540P Which display is better??

    Hello again folks,
    Can you tell me, in your opinion, which display is better in terms of sharpness, viewing angles, contrast, saturation etc. between the top option display in the T440s vs. the best display available in the T540P?
    I want to get the ThinkPad that has the absolute best display for photo editing.
    Thanks so much for your help.
    best to you all,
    rick

    I've seen both screens. Please be aware that the T440s has two FHD screens, the LG and AUO. I will assume you get the AUO. (better than LG)
    Being a AHVA, the AUO has better viewing angles than the 3k IPS of the T540p. A slight shift in contrast is typical for IPS screens. However, you will still be able to see the image from almost all angles on both displays.
    As for contrast, the T440s fares better as well at 800:1 vs. 500:1.
    Color-wise they both cover sRGB (90-100%) but then again, the T440s has a slightly higher coverage of AdobeRGB, though I can't recall any numbers right now.
    Brightness is about the same, 300 nits on both. In terms of sharpness, the T540p wins hands down. The T440s can't keep up with the high 2880x1620 resolution.
    Both are good for photo editing. The T440s would be slightly better IMHO, but you will need a colorimeter on both anyway, because the calibration is a bit off. I think in the end, it doesn't really matter which one you take, like I said, both are very good and suitable for photo editing.
    ThinkPad X301 (2.13GHz) | T61 (FlexView) | Tablet 2

  • Which browser is better to use as an option to Safari and how do you download it?

    Which browser is better to use as an option to Safari and how do you safely download it? Thanks

    I use Firefox when a site doesn't work well with Safari. Some people like Google's Chrome, but I find it too instrusive and do not trust Google's security. You can download Firefox from firefox.com.
    Regards.

  • WHICH IS BETTER OPTION IN THE U.S. MARKET SAP CRM or SAP SD

    HI I WISH TO DO A COURSE IN SAP I HAVE TO DECIDE BETWEEN 2 OPTIONS SHOULD I DO SAP SD or SAP CRM WHICH ONE IS A BETTER OPTION AS I AM AN M.B.A. IN MARKETING WITH NO I.T. OR TECH KNOWLEDGE AT ALL. SO WHAT CAN YOU RECCOMEND PLEASE REPLY IT WOULD BE APPRECIATED
    THANKS

    Hello Monty,
    I m located in Mumbai, India.
    Surely I would have helped in India.
    As  far as NY or NJ is concerned I don't know much.
    Here in India we have SIEMENS or GENOVATE which provide SAP Cerification.
    Search for some authorized training acadamey of SAP there, search on net........
    Definitely U will succeed.
    Reward me points, if this helps.
    Anubhav
    [email protected]

  • If i have two option to select between XI or BW which one in better and why

    if i have two option to select between XI or BW which one in better and why
    both in terms of money and in terms of my career growth.......

    Sheetika,
    XI if you  are good in JAVA.The rest is same for both XI and BW.
    K.Kiran.

  • Which is better option to trigger data to XI

    Hi Experts,
    Happy new Year to all of you.
    here I have one query, How we decide at the ERP side, whether we have to use IDOC, RFC and Proxy to trigger the Datafor the XI Interface. I know for the XI Performabce wise proxy is better option.
    Please give more inputs of yours on this.
    Many Thanks.

    >
    > here I have one query, How we decide at the ERP side, whether we have to use IDOC, RFC and Proxy to trigger the Datafor the XI Interface. I know for the XI Performabce wise proxy is better option.
    >
    Suppose if you develope scenario between IDoc->PI> in this case you need to import IDoc from SAP System in to PI,when you triegegr IDoc in ERP/ECC the day will reacches PI System.
    If you develop RFC>PI-> IN THIS CASE THE PROCEDURE ALSO SAME,like import RFC in to PI,trigger RFC in ERP system...
    When you go for Prosy,you need to specify the logic in ABAP Proxy class which program,and interface going to use.
    we can say Proxy performce better,but it depends on volume of Data.
    Regards,
    Raj

  • Which of these to option is better ?

    Hi All I,m after some info/feedback Which of these 2 options is better to use on wireless connections  Powerlines or USB Dongles ?  any help greatly recieved
    JamJar62

    Hi jamjar62
    The main thing to remember with any wireless comms is that interference can play a major part in stopping it from working at it's best.
    Poweline connectors - A well installed ring main is the best for these to work. Any spurs from the ring, including socket extension cables etc, can seriously intefere with the signals between each network connection point.
    Wireless (including dongles) - This can be affected by the proximity of other wireless networks. There are some threads on the forums for choosing a channel that will best suit your local conditions. Brick walls can affect transmission also. Microwave ovens in operation can also affect wireless signalling.
    I'm lucky enough to have wooden floors with access underneath so my home is all cat6 connected. Cabling although a bit untidy, is the fastest way to connect if you can do it.
    Hope that gives you a bit of an insight.
    If you found this information useful, then please click the star to the left of this post
    ptan

  • Which MBP is better for Final Cut Pro?

    Hi Everyone,
    I'm looking to replace my 2010 MacBook Pro 13" on a budget. I'd like to get a retina 13" macbook pro, either the refurb 2012 with 8GB ram and the i5, or the refurb 2013 with 4GB ram, i5 and the new Intel Iris graphics card. Which is better for medium to intense final cut pro, photoshop, and dreamweaver work? Does the Intel Iris card make a big difference or should I be getting more RAM?
    Thanks

    First, check the Model Identifier in your Mac's Apple Menu > 'About this Mac' > 'More info' > 'System Report' > 'Hardware Overview'
    Next, check OWC to find out exactly how much RAM your proposed MBPs can take. Apple gives correct specs at time of development. Later, larger RAM is developed that will work with some Mac models.
    For video, FCPX will use as many processor cores as are available. It will use all 12 cores of the latest Mac Pro. This makes FXPX run very fast. Most other programs don't use multiple cores at all and a few only use a couple of cores. With more cores comes slower clock speed, which is needed by programs that dont use multiple cores.
    Eventually, all high-end programs will use multiple cores, so, if you have the option, get as many cores as you can with your current purchase. This will especially benefit FCPX immediatly, it will help higher-end programs later, and the slower clock speed won't really affect the more run-of-the-mill programs (like word processing) because clock speeds are pretty reasonable these days (for a laugh, read this in fifty years time).
    Get the minimum RAM available because you can upgrade later and will probably have to sacrifice the RAM you have. Third party RAM (again, you can check OWC) is cheaper than buying it with your computer pruchase. Make sure it's designed for your Mac.
    You can use Activity Monitor to check if FCPX (or any program) is paging. You don't want this. It means it is writing to disk—effectively virtual memory—that should be handled in RAM. This is very slow and inefficient. It only does that when it needs more RAM than is available. That's when you upgrade your RAM (which could be immediatly after you buy).
    The single most effective thing you can do to get FCPX to perform better on an existing computer (or any comuter) is to swap your hard drive for an SSD. SSDs read and write so fast compared to even the fastest hard drive that you can do multicam edits in real time without dropping frames. Rendering is a lot faster becuse it writes the render to disk, and so is launching and exporting (or, as Apple insists, 'Sharing'), which also writes to disk. SSDs may seem expensive (they are coming down in price), but the productivity gains are absolutly worth it.

Maybe you are looking for