Why is query taking too much time ?

Hi gurus,
I have a table name test which has 100000 records in it,now the question i like to ask is.
when i query select * from test ; no proble with responce time, but when the next day i fire the above query it is taking too much of time say 3 times.i would also like to tell you that everything is ok in respect of tuning,the db is properly tuned, network is tuned properly. what could be the hurting factor here ??
take care
All expertise.

Here is a small test on my windows PC.
oracle 9i Rel1.
Table : emp_test
number of records : 42k
set autot trace exp stat
15:29:13 jaffar@PRIMEDB> select * from emp_test;
41665 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.06 ==> response time.
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
1 0 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP_TEST' (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
2951 consistent gets
178 physical reads
0 redo size
1268062 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
31050 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2779 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
41665 rows processed
15:29:40 jaffar@PRIMEDB> delete from emp_test where deptno = 10;
24998 rows deleted.
Elapsed: 00:00:10.06
15:31:19 jaffar@PRIMEDB> select * from emp_test;
16667 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.09 ==> response time
Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
1 0 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP_TEST' (Cost=24 Card=41665 Bytes=916630)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1289 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
218615 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
12724 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1113 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
16667 rows processed

Similar Messages

  • Delete query taking too much time

    Hi All,
    my delete query is taking too much time. around 1hr 30 min for 1.5 lac records.
    Though I have dropped mv log on the table & disabled all the triggers on it.
    Moreover deletion is based on primary key .
    delete from table_name where primary_key in (values)
    above is dummy format of my query.
    can anyone please tell me what could be other reason that query is performing that slow.
    Is there anything to check in DB other than triggers,mv log,constraints in order to improve the performance?
    Please reply asap.

    Delete is the most time consuming operation, as the whole record data has to be stored at the undo segments. On the other hand, there is a part of the query used to select records to delete that probably is adding an extra overhead to the process, the in (values) clause. It would be nice on your side to post another dummy from this (values) clause. I could figure out this is a subquery, and in order for you to obtain this list you have to run a inefficient query.
    You can gather the execution plan so you can see where the most heavy part of th query is. This way a better tuning approach and a more accurate diagnostic can be issued.
    ~ Madrid.

  • Query taking too much time with dates??

    hello folks,
    I am trying pull some data using the date condition and for somereason its taking too much time to return the data
       and trunc(al.activity_date) = TRUNC (SYSDATE, 'DD') - 1     --If i use this its takes too much time
      and al.activity_date >= to_date('20101123 000000', 'YYYYMMDD HH24MISS')
       and al.activity_date <= to_date('20101123 235959', 'YYYYMMDD HH24MISS') -- If i use this it returns the data in a second. why is that?
    How do i get the previous day without using the hardcoded to_date('20101123 000000', 'YYYYMMDD HH24MISS'), if i need to retrieve it faster??

    Presumably you've got an index on activity_date.
    If you apply a function like TRUNC to activity_date, you can no longer use the index.
    Post execution plans to verify.
    and al.activity_date >= TRUNC (SYSDATE, 'DD') - 1
    and al.activity_date < TRUNC (SYSDATE, 'DD')

  • Why it is taking too much time to kill the process?

    Hi All,
    Today,one of my user ran the calc script and the process is taking too much time, then i kill the process. I am wondering about one thing here even it is taking too long to kill the process, generally it will not take more than 2 sec. I did this through EAS.
    After that I ran Maxl statement
    alter system kill request 552599515;
    there is no use at all.
    Please reply if you have any solutions to kill this process.
    Thanks in advance.
    Ram.

    Hi Ram,
    1. Firstly, How much time does your calculation scripts normally run.
    2. While it was running, you can go to the logs and monitor where exactly the script is taking time .
    3. Sometimes, it does take time to cancel a transaction ( as it might be in between).
    4. Maxl is always good to kill ,as you did . It should be succesful . Check the logs what it says ,and also the "sessions" which might say "terminating" and finish it off.
    5. If nothing works ,and in the worst case scenarion , if its taking time without doing anything. Then log off all the users and stop the databas and start it .
    6. Do log off all the users, so that you dont corrupt any filter related sec file.
    Be very careful , if its production ( and I assume you have latest backups)
    Sandeep Reddy Enti
    HCC
    http://hyperionconsultancy.com/

  • Query taking too much time!!!!!

    Sorry for posting without format. I will post an another question with the use of your format blog.
    Edited by: San on 22 Feb, 2011 3:18 PM

    When your query takes too long ...
    HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting

  • Crystal Report Query taking too much time

    Hi,
    We are developing one report based on SQL Server 2008 in Crystal Report. There are around 50,000 valid combination in database. Based on dynamic filter we need to bring few records in report. Since these filters are at report level, and crystal report is using microcube, it is taking more than 15 mins to execute.
    Is there any option to fetch record based on filter applied at report level.
    Regards
    Baby

    HI,
    First of all , thank you very much.
    Since having cascading prompt, we never thought in this way.
    Details:-
    For our report we have 4 prompts.
    1. category->family-brand (cascading- mandatory)
    2. season(madatory)
    3.collection (madatory)
    4.owner(not mandatory)
    previously we set all these filters at record level.
    Now we set season and collection at query level and brand, owner at report level. Report only query for selected season and collection only.
    Thanks once again.
    Regards
    Baby

  • Select query taking too much time to fetch data from pool table a005

    Dear all,
    I am using 2 pool table a005 and a006 in my program. I am using select query to fetch data from these table. i.e. example is mentioned below.
    select * from a005 into table t_a005 for all entries in it_itab
                       where vkorg in s_vkorg
                       and     matnr in  s_matnr
                       and     aplp   in  s_aplp
                       and     kmunh = it_itab-kmunh.
    here i can't create index also as tables are pool table...If there is any solutions , than please help me for same..
    Thanks ,

    it would be helpful to know what other fields are in the internal table you are using for the FOR ALL ENTRIES.
    In general, you should code the order of your fields in the select in the same order as they appear in the database.  If you do not have the top key field, then the entire database is read. If it's large then it's going to take a lot of time.  The more key fields from the beginning of the structure that you can supply at faster the retrieval.
    Regards,
    Brent

  • Insert Query taking too much time (5 hrs)

    Hi experts,
    We are using "Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi" on our server, and we are trying to execute the SQL script which inserts data into a table from 5 different table.
    Note: The SQL query is been passed directly to the server.
    Need your expertise as to what is causing the script to run so slow.....(It's taking around 5 hrs to execute the script).
    The Script is as follow's;
    Insert /*+ append */ into TABLE1 NOLOGGING
    SELECT DISTINCT /*+ PARALLEL(TABLE1, 4) */ ROW_NUMBER() OVER
    (ORDER BY COL1, COL2, COL3, COL4, COL5, COL6, COL7, COL8, COL9) AS PK_ID, TABLE1.COL1 AS PRODUCT_ID, TABLE1.M_NBR AS M_NBR, TABLE1.P_NBR AS P_NBR, TABLE1.C_ID AS C_ID, TABLE1.TABLE1_SERV_DT AS TABLE1_SERV_DT, TABLE1.C_KEY AS C_KEY, TABLE1.C_DEN AS C_DEN, TABLE1.A_S_DT AS A_S_DT,
    TABLE1.F_ID AS F_ID, TABLE1.L_DT AS L_DT, TABLE1.A_DT AS A_DT, TABLE1.D_DT AS D_DT, TABLE1.C_TYPE AS C_TYPE,
    TABLE1.S_COL AS S_COL, TABLE1.S_TBL AS S_TBL, TABLE4.ME AS ME, TABLE1.ER_YN AS ER_YN
    FROM
    TABLE1,
    TABLE2,
    TABLE3,
    TABLE4,
    TABLE5
    WHERE
    TABLE1.COL1 = TABLE2.COL1
    AND
    TABLE1.COL2 = TABLE3.COL2
    AND
    TABLE1.COL3 = TABLE4.COL3
    AND
    (TABLE1.SERV_DT BETWEEN RY_START AND RY_END)
    AND
    (TABLE1.CLAIM = :"SYS_B_0")
    AND
    (TABLE2.INACTIVATED = :"SYS_B_1")
    AND
    (TABLE2.TABLE1 = :"SYS_B_2")
    AND
    (TABLE2.PRELIM = :"SYS_B_3")
    AND
    (TABLE3.MEASURE = :"SYS_B_4")
    AND
    (TABLE3.EVENTS = :"SYS_B_5");

    In addition to APC, here's some more on the subject:
    EXACT - (Default) Only statements with an exact text match will share the same SQL area.
    SIMILAR - Oracle will substitute bind variable for all literals, thereby increasing the chances of a text match. Oracle will force similar statements to share the SQL area without deteriorating execution plans.
    FORCE - The same as SIMILAR except that execution plans may deteriorate. This option should only be used if the risk of suboptimal plans is outweighed by the increase in cursor sharing .
    Summary from:
    http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/9i/performance-enhancements-9i.php#CursorSharing
    In-depth:
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/issue-archive/2006/06-jan/o16asktom-101983.html
    and you can search the docs @ http://www.oracle.com/pls/db112/homepage for more.
    Hope your DBA and you can fix it.
    Keep us posted.

  • Partition Table Query taking Too Much Time

    I have created partition table and Created local partition index on a column whose datatype is DATE.
    Now when I Query table and use index column in the where clause It is scaning all the table (Full scan) . The quey is :
    Select * From mytable
    where to_char(transaction_date, 'DD-MON-YY') = '01-Aug-07';
    I have to use to_char function not to_date due to Front end application problem.

    Before we go too far with this, if you manually query with TO_DATE on the variable instead of TO_CHAR on the column, does the query actually use the index?
    The TO_CHAR on the column will definitely stop Oracle from using any index on the column. If the query will use the index if you TO_DATE the variable, as I see it, you have three options. First, fix the application problem that won't let you use TO_DATE from the application. Second, change the application to call a function returning a ref cursor, get the date string as a parameter to the function, and do the TO_DATE in the function.
    Third, you could consider creating a function-based index on TO_CHAR(transaction_date, 'dd-Mon-yy'). This would be the least desirable option, particularly if you would also be selecting records based on a range of transaction_dates, since it loses a lot of information that the optimizer could use in devising an efficient query plan. It could also change your results for a range scan.
    John

  • Query taking too much time when running through discover

    Hi
    I have created report with sql query by creating custom folder in oracle discover desktop. Query is using parameter with sys_context. When report is executed from discover it takes more than 5 minutes and same query is executed in 30 seconds when executed in database through toad.
    Pls. let me know what could be the reason for this?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    The first thing to check is whether the query is running to completion in TOAD. By default, TOAD just selects the first 50 rows, where as Discoverer must return all the rows before displaying results if a crosstab report is used.
    Secondly, check that the queries and the explain plans are the same in Discoverer and Toad. Although, Discoverer shows the SQL in the SQL inspector this isn't necessarily the SQL actually sent to the database. Use TOAD to interogate the Discoverer session to determine the actual SQL and compare this SQL and explain plan to SQL you ran in TOAD.
    Thirdly, check that the session context is the same in both cases. So check that any custom contexts and the USER_ENV context is the same, and if any security packages or VPD policies are used in the SQL that these have been initialised the same.
    If you still cannot determine the difference then trace both sessions.
    Rod West

  • Why it is taking too much time to login in yosemite? and to load webpages.. whenever i kept in sleep mode battery drains itself causing overheat... what might be the cause and solution? i have my projects going on..please help.thanks.

    thanks

       Reset PRAM.   http://support.apple.com/kb/PH18761
    Reset SMC.     http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3964
    Choose the method for:
    "Resetting SMC on portables with a battery you should not remove on your own".
       Start up in Safe Mode.  http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT1564

  • Spatial query with sdo_aggregate_union taking too much time

    Hello friends,
    the following query taking too much time for execution.
    table1 contains around 2000 records.
    table2 contains 124 rows
    SELECT
    table1.id
    , table1.txt
    , table1.id2
    , table1.acti
    , table1.acti
    , table1.geom as geom
    FROM
    table1
    WHERE
    sdo_relate
    table1.geom,
    select sdo_aggr_union(sdoaggrtype(geom, 0.0005))
    from table2
    ,'mask=(ANYINTERACT) querytype=window'
    )='TRUE'
    I am new in spatial. trying to find out list of geometry which is fall within geometry stored in table2.
    Thanks

    Hi Thanks lot for your reply.
    But It is not require to use sdo_aggregate function to find out whether geomatry in one table is in other geomatry..
    Let me give you clear picture....
    What I trying to do is, tale1 contains list of all station (station information) of state and table2 contains list of area of city. So I want to find out station which is belonging to city.
    For this I thought to get aggregation union of city area and then check for any interaction of that final aggregation result with station geometry to check whether it is in city or not.
    I hope this would help you to understand my query.
    Thanks
    I appreciate your efforts.

  • Client import taking too much time

    hi all,
    i am importing a client , i it has complete copy table 19,803 of 19,803 but for last four hours its status is processing
    scc3
    Target Client           650
    Copy Type               Client Import Post-Proc
    Profile                 SAP_CUST
    Status                  Processing...
    User                    SAP*
    Start on                24.05.2009 / 15:08:03
    Last Entry on           24.05.2009 / 15:36:25
    Current Action:         Post Processing
    -  Last Exit Program    RGBCFL01
    Transport Requests
    - Client-Specific       PRDKT00004
    - Texts                 PRDKX00004
    Statistics for this Run
    - No. of Tables             19803 of     19803
    - Deleted Lines                 7
    - Copied Lines                  0
    sm50
    1 DIA 542           Running Yes             SAPLTHFB 650 SAP*     
    7 BGD 4172   Running Yes 11479  RGTBGD23 650 SAP* Sequential Read     D010INC
    sm66
    Server  No. Type PID Status  Reason Sem Start Error CPU Time   User Report   Action          Table
    prdsap_PRD_00  7  BTC 4172 Running   Yes    11711 SAP* RGTBGD23 Sequential Read D010INC
    plz guide me why it is taking too much time , while it has finished most of the things
    best regard
    Khan

    The import is in post processing. It digs through all the documents and adapts them to the new client. Most of the tables in the application area have a "MANDT" (= client) field which needs to be changed. Depending of the size of the client this can take a huge amount of time.
    You can try to improve the speed by updating the table statistics for table D010INC.
    Markus

  • Job is taking too much time

    Hi,
    I am running one SQL code that is taking 1 hrs. but when I schedule this code in JOB using package it is taking 5 hrs.
    could anybody suggest why it is taking too much time?
    Regards
    Gagan

    Use TRACE and TKPROF with wait events to see where time is being spent (or waisted).
    See these informative threads:
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
    HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
    Also you can use V$SESSION and/or V$SESSION_LONGOPS to see what code is currently executing.

  • Job is taking too much time during Delta loads

    hi
    when i tried to extract Delta records from R3 for Standard Extractor 0FI_GL_4 it is taking 46 mins while there are very less no. of delta records(193 records only).
    PFA the R3 Job log. the major time is taking in calling the Customer enhacement BW_BTE_CALL_BW204010_E.
    please let me know why this is taking too much time.
    06:10:16  4 LUWs confirmed and 4 LUWs to be deleted with FB RSC2_QOUT_CONFIRM_DATA
    06:56:46  Call up of customer enhancement BW_BTE_CALL_BW204010_E (BTE) with 193 records
    06:56:46  Result of customer enhancement: 193 records
    06:56:46  Call up of customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 193 records
    06:56:46  Result of customer enhancement: 193 records
    06:56:46  Asynchronous sending of data package 1 in task 0002 (1 parallel tasks)
    06:56:47  IDOC: InfoIDOC 2, IDOC no. 121289649, duration 00:00:00
    06:56:47  IDOC: Begin 09.05.2011 06:10:15, end 09.05.2011 06:10:15
    06:56:48  Asynchronous sending of InfoIDOCs 3 in task 0003 (1 parallel tasks)
    06:56:48  Through selection conditions, 0 records filtered out in total
    06:56:48  IDOC: InfoIDOC 3, IDOC no. 121289686, duration 00:00:00
    06:56:48  IDOC: Begin 09.05.2011 06:56:48, end 09.05.2011 06:56:48
    06:56:54  tRFC: Data package 1, TID = 3547D5D96D2C4DC7740F217E, duration 00:00:07, ARFCSTATE =
    06:56:54  tRFC: Begin 09.05.2011 06:56:47, end 09.05.2011 06:56:54
    06:56:55  Synchronous sending of InfoIDOCs 4 (0 parallel tasks)
    06:56:55  IDOC: InfoIDOC 4, IDOC no. 121289687, duration 00:00:00
    06:56:55  IDOC: Begin 09.05.2011 06:56:55, end 09.05.2011 06:56:55
    06:56:55  Job finished
    Regards
    Atul

    Hi Atul,
    Have you written any customer exit code . If yes check for the optimization for it .
    Kind Regards,
    Ashutosh Singh

Maybe you are looking for