Why NetWeaver04 DB instance takes more time during 'Database Load' phase?

Hi,
I'm installing NetWeaver04 CI and DB instances on Solaris 10 machine and as a standalone installation. CI was installed fine and DB instance install takes forever and i don't know how long it will take because i started this at 17.20 and now it is 22.01. Here is the summary of my install.
1. Installed CI
Note: Unicode ABAP install
2. Ran DB instance install:
Note:Selected Advanced database options instead of RAW device
3. Completed Oracle install and continued for DB instance install
Note: Selected Unicode option and selected Enterprise install
4. The install so far completed 25 out of 39 tasks and it is waiting for more than 4 hrs at Database Load phase.
I'm not sure what will be the result of my install. I would like to know whether it is supposed to take that long for DB instance install. Could someone tell me what would be the reason and what would i've missed in the install steps.
Thanks,
Ram

The load is by far the most time consuming operation; you can make this run faster if you have a large amount of hardware by increasing the number of parallel R3trans jobs (default is 3) during the installation. It's not uncommon for this step to run for several hours if you don't increase this parameter.
Also, you might watch the oracle alert log; if your archive directory fills up, the load will just hang indefinitly. If you create your oraarch filesystem with at least 4 GB of space, this shouldn't be an issue during the initial load, but if it's much smaller, you could run into a problem there....
Rich

Similar Messages

Error during database load in ECC 5.0

Hello All,
i am trying to install ECC.5 with oracle 10g during database load phase he is giving me a error when i saw in log file i found this.
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: START OF LOG: 20090611085559
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: sccsid @(#) $Id: //bas/640_REL/src/R3ld/R3load/R3ldmain.c#6 $ SAP
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: version R6.40/V1.4
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe -ctf I E:/sap5/51031332_1/EXP1/DATA/SAP0000.STR C:\Program Files\sapinst_instdir\ECC50\SYSTEM\ABAP\ORA\NUC\DB/DDLORA.TPL C:\Program Files\sapinst_instdir\ECC50\SYSTEM\ABAP\ORA\NUC\DB/SAP0000.TSK ORA -l C:\Program Files\sapinst_instdir\ECC50\SYSTEM\ABAP\ORA\NUC\DB/SAP0000.log -o D
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: job completed
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: END OF LOG: 20090611085559
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: START OF LOG: 20090611103425
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: sccsid @(#) $Id: //bas/640_REL/src/R3ld/R3load/R3ldmain.c#6 $ SAP
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: version R6.40/V1.4
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe -dbcodepage 1100 -i C:\Program Files\sapinst_instdir\ECC50\SYSTEM\ABAP\ORA\NUC\DB/SAP0000.cmd -l C:\Program Files\sapinst_instdir\ECC50\SYSTEM\ABAP\ORA\NUC\DB/SAP0000.log -stop_on_error
DbSl Trace: OCI-call 'OCISessionBegin' failed: rc = 1034
DbSl Trace: CONNECT failed with sql error '1034'
DbSl Trace: OCI-call 'OCISessionBegin' failed: rc = 1034
DbSl Trace: CONNECT failed with sql error '1034'
(DB) ERROR: db_connect rc = 256
DbSl Trace: OCI-call 'OCISessionBegin' failed: rc = 1034
DbSl Trace: CONNECT failed with sql error '1034'
DbSl Trace: OCI-call 'OCISessionBegin' failed: rc = 1034
DbSl Trace: CONNECT failed with sql error '1034'
(DB) ERROR: DbSlErrorMsg rc = 99
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: job finished with 1 error(s)
C:\usr\sap\EPT\SYS\exe\run/R3load.exe: END OF LOG: 20090611103428
can anybody help me to sort this out.
Any help highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Subhash

First of all thanks for helping me
i have tried this
Connected to an idle instance.
SQL> STARTUP MOUNT
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 205520896 bytes
Fixed Size                  1248116 bytes
Variable Size             117441676 bytes
Database Buffers           83886080 bytes
Redo Buffers                2945024 bytes
Database mounted.
SQL> SET AUTORECOVERY ON
SQL> RECOVER DATABASE
ORA-00279: change 262364 generated at 06/11/2009 09:43:56 needed for thread 1
ORA-00289: suggestion : C:\ORACLE\EPT\ORAARCH\EPTARCHARC00052_0689209324.001
ORA-00280: change 262364 for thread 1 is in sequence #52
ORA-00308: cannot open archived log
'C:\ORACLE\EPT\ORAARCH\EPTARCHARC00052_0689209324.001'
ORA-27041: unable to open file
OSD-04002: unable to open file
O/S-Error: (OS 2) The system cannot find the file specified.
But i m not able to see any archive file on oraarch folder
Regards
Subhash

Why import of change request in production takes more time than quality?

Hello All,
why import of change request in production takes more time than import into quality?

Hi jahangeer,
I believe it takes same time to import a request in both quality and production as they will be in sync.
Even then if it takes more time in production that may depend on the change request.
Thanks
Pavan

Why view have no stored data ? And what is the reason view take more time

Why view have no stored data ? And what is the reason view take more time to query ?
what happen if a view have stored data?

user12941450 wrote:
I want to know the reason that why querying view is slower then querying a normal table?..Untrue.
For example take a table with 2laks record and a view for that table.
If i make a query like( Select name,address from table) then it works fast then select(name,address)from view..Incorrectly interpreting the results.
A view is a SQL statement. Only difference is that the SQL statement is stored in the database's dictionary. Let's consider the following view:
create or replace view foo_view as select * from empWhen you use the view as follows:
select * from foo_viewOracle sees it as follows:
select * from (select * from emp)This is no slower, or no faster, than providing the following SQL to Oracle:
select * from empSo if you observe a difference in performance between using plain SQL versus using that same SQL via a view, there are other reasons for that difference in performance. The reason is NOT that views are slower.

Why Garbage Collection take more time on JRockit?

My company use 
BEA WebLogic 8.1.2 
JRockit version 1.4.2 
Window 2003 32bit 
RAM 4 Gig 
 
-Xms = 1300 
-Xmx = 1300 
and running ejb application. 
My problem is why JRockit take more time. How Can I solve this problem. Because my application will down again.
 
This is my infomation on JRockit :
 
Gc Algorithm: JRockit Garbage Collection System currently running strategy: Single generational, parallel mark, parallel sweep.
 
Total Garbage Collection Count: 10340
 
Last GC End: Wed May 10 13:55:37 ICT 2006
 
Last GC Start: Wed May 10 13:55:35 ICT 2006
 
Total Garbage Collection Time: 2:53:13.1
 
GC Handles Compaction: true
 
Concurrent: false
 
Generational: false
 
Incremental: false
 
Parallel: true
 

Hi,
I will suggest you to check a few places where you can see the status
1) SM37 job log (In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load) (give request name) and it should give you the details about the request. If its active make sure that the job log is getting updated at frequent intervals.
Also see if there is any 'sysfail' for any datapacket in SM37.
2) SM66 get the job details (server name PID etc from SM37) and see in SM66 if the job is running or not. (In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load). See if its accessing/updating some tables or is not doing anything at all.
3) RSMO see what is available in details tab. It may be in update rules.
4) ST22 check if any short dump has occured.(In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load)
5) SM58 and BD87 for pending tRFCs and IDOCS.
Once you identify you can rectify the error.
If all the records are in PSA you can pull it from the PSA to target. Else you may have to pull it again from source infoprovider.
If its running and if you are able to see it active in SM66 you can wait for some time to let it finish. You can also try SM50 / SM51 to see what is happening in the system level like reading/inserting tables etc.
If you feel its active and running you can verify by checking if the number of records has increased in the data tables.
SM21 - System log can also be helpful.
Also RSA7 will show LUWS which means more than one record.
Thanks,
JituK

Oracle coherence first read/write operation take more time

I'm currently testing with oracle coherence Java and C++ version and from both versions for writing to any local or distributed or near cache first read/write operation take more time compared to next consecutive read/write operation. Is this because of boost operations happening inside actual HashMap or serialization or memory mapped implementation. What are the techniques which we can use to improve the performance with this first read/write operation?
Currently I'm doing a single read/write operation after fetching the NamedCache Instance. Please let me know whether there's any other boosting coherence cache techniques available.

In which case, why bother using Coherence? You're not really gaining anything, are you?
What I'm trying to explain is that you're probably not going to get that "micro-second" level performance on a fully configured Coherence cluster, running across multiple machines, going via proxies for c++ clients. Coherence is designed to be a scalable, fault-tolerant, distributed caching/processing system. It's not really designed for real-time, guaranteed, nano-second/micro-second level processing. There are much better product stacks out there for that type of processing if that is your ultimate goal, IMHO.
As you say, just writing to a small, local Map (or array, List, Set, etc.) in a local JVM is always going to be very fast - literally as fast as the processor running in the machine. But that's not really the focus of a product like Coherence. It isn't trying to "out gun" what you can achieve on one machine doing simple processing; Coherence is designed for scalability rather than outright performance. Of course, the use of local caches (including Coherence's near caching or replicated caching), can get you back some of the performance you've "lost" in a distributed system, but it's all relative.
If you wander over to a few of the CUG presentations and attend a few CUG meetings, one of the first things the support guys will tell you is "benchmark on a proper cluster" and not "on a localised development machine". Why? Because the difference in scalability and performance will be huge. I'm not really trying to deter you from Coherence, but I don't think it's going to meet you requirements when fully configured in a cluster of "1 Micro seconds for 100000 data collection" on a continuous basis.
Just my two cents.
Cheers,
Steve
NB. I don't work for Oracle, so maybe they have a different opinion. :)

Import SCA files in Development Tab of the Transport Studio take more time

Hi,
After Check-In files in the Transport Studio, the import of SCA files starts in the development Tab of the Transport Studio.
The import takes more time. Why this happens?
Am I missing any configuration? Please specify in detail.
Thanks in Advance,
Sathya

SC: sap.com_SAP-JEE:
SDM-deploy
Returncode : Not executed.
How to check the username, password and url for SDM?
Log file of Repository-import:
Info:Starting Step Repository-import at 2009-10-13 22:15:49.0484 +5:00
Info:Component:sap.com/SAP_JTECHS
Info:Version :SAP AG.20060119105400
Info:3. PR is of type TCSSoftwareComponent
Info:Component:sap.com/SAP_BUILDT
Info:Version :SAP AG.20060411165600
Info:2. PR is of type TCSSoftwareComponent
Info:Component:sap.com/SAP-JEE
Info:Version :SAP AG.20060119105300
Info:1. PR is of type TCSSoftwareComponent
Info:Step Repository-import ended with result 'not needed' at 2009-10-13 22:15:49.0500 +5:00
Log File of CBS-make :
Import got failed.
Info:build process already running: waiting for another period of 30000 ms
Info:no changes on the CBS request queue (DM0_DEMObp1_D) after a waiting time of 14430000 ms
Fatal:The request queue is not processed by the CBS during the given time intervall => TCS cannot import the request because queue is not empty
Fatal:There seems to be a structural problem in the NWDI. Please look after the operational status of the CBS.
Fatal Exception:com.sap.cms.tcs.interfaces.exceptions.TCSCommunicationException: communication error: The request queue is not processed during the given time intervall. There seems to be a structural problem in the NWDI. Please look after the operational status of the CBS.:communication error: The request queue is not processed during the given time intervall. There seems to be a structural problem in the NWDI. Please look after the operational status of the CBS.
com.sap.cms.tcs.interfaces.exceptions.TCSCommunicationException: communication error: The request queue is not processed during the given time intervall. There seems to be a structural problem in the NWDI. Please look after the operational status of the CBS.
     at com.sap.cms.tcs.client.CBSCommunicator.importRequest(CBSCommunicator.java:369)
     at com.sap.cms.tcs.core.CbsMakeTask.processMake(CbsMakeTask.java:120)
     at com.sap.cms.tcs.core.CbsMakeTask.process(CbsMakeTask.java:347)
     at com.sap.cms.tcs.process.ProcessStep.processStep(ProcessStep.java:77)
     at com.sap.cms.tcs.process.ProcessStarter.process(ProcessStarter.java:179)
     at com.sap.cms.tcs.core.TCSManager.importPropagationRequests(TCSManager.java:376)
     at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.importazione.ImportManager.importazione(ImportManager.java:216)
     at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.importazione.ImportQueueHandler.execImport(ImportQueueHandler.java:585)
     at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.importazione.ImportQueueHandler.startImport(ImportQueueHandler.java:101)
     at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.proxy.CmsTransportProxyBean.startImport(CmsTransportProxyBean.java:583)
     at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.proxy.CmsTransportProxyBean.startImport(CmsTransportProxyBean.java:559)
     at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.proxy.LocalCmsTransportProxyLocalObjectImpl0.startImport(LocalCmsTransportProxyLocalObjectImpl0.java:1736)
     at com.sap.cms.ui.wl.Custom1.importQueue(Custom1.java:1169)
     at com.sap.cms.ui.wl.wdp.InternalCustom1.importQueue(InternalCustom1.java:2162)
     at com.sap.cms.ui.wl.Worklist.onActionImportQueue(Worklist.java:880)
     at com.sap.cms.ui.wl.wdp.InternalWorklist.wdInvokeEventHandler(InternalWorklist.java:2338)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.generation.DelegatingView.invokeEventHandler(DelegatingView.java:87)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.controller.Action.fire(Action.java:67)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WindowPhaseModel.doHandleActionEvent(WindowPhaseModel.java:422)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WindowPhaseModel.processRequest(WindowPhaseModel.java:133)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WebDynproWindow.processRequest(WebDynproWindow.java:344)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.cal.AbstractClient.executeTasks(AbstractClient.java:143)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ApplicationSession.doProcessing(ApplicationSession.java:298)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doApplicationProcessingStandalone(ClientSession.java:705)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doApplicationProcessing(ClientSession.java:659)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doProcessing(ClientSession.java:227)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.RequestManager.doProcessing(RequestManager.java:150)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.defaultimpl.DispatcherServlet.doContent(DispatcherServlet.java:56)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.defaultimpl.DispatcherServlet.doPost(DispatcherServlet.java:47)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:390)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:264)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:347)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:325)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:887)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:241)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:92)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:148)
     at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
     at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:100)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:170)
Info:Step CBS-make ended with result 'fatal error' ,stopping execution at 2009-10-14 02:16:28.0296 +5:00

Takes more time to start & shutdown the database

Hi All,
I have created a database in oracle9i by following manual steps. Every thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and shutdown also.
but the problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the database and the same during the shutdown. So anyone help me..
the follwing are the pfile specifications:
db_name=practice
instance_name=practice
control_files= 'E:\practice\control\control1.ctl',
'D:\practice\control\control2.ctl'
db_block_size=2048
db_cache_size=20m
shared_pool_size=20m
background_dump_dest='E:\practice\bdump'
user_dump_dest='E:\practice\udump'
Thanks in Advance

Every thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and > shutdown also.Please restate the above.
problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the >database and the same during the shutdownHow have you compared? Could it be O/S resources, installation of additional software; you have not mentioned the O/S and complete version of your database.
You can review the following although I am bit unclear;
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96533/instreco.htm#440322
Adith

'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document

Hi Experts,
I m using 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' in my custom report, it takes more time for creating Material documents.
Please let me know if there is any option to overcome this issue.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Leo

Hi,
please check if some of following OSS notes are not valid for your problem:
[Note 838036 - AFS: Performance issues during GR with ref. to PO|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/838036]
[Note 391142 - Performance: Goods receipt for inbound delivery|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/391142]
[Note 1414418 - Goods receipt for customer returns: Various corrections|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414418]
The other idea is not to commit each call, but executing commit of packages e.g. after 1000 BAPI calls.
But otherwise, I am afraid you can not do a lot about performance of standard BAPI. Maybe there is some customer enhancement which is taking too long inside the BAPI, but this has to be analysed by you. To analyse performance, just execute your program via tr. SE30.
Regards
Adrian

'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document for the 1st time

Hi Experts,
I am doing goods movement using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE in my custom code.
Then there is some functional configuration such that, material documents and TR and TO are getting created.
Now I need to get TO and TR numbers from LTAK table passing material documnt number and year, which I got from above used BAPI.
The problem I am facing is very strange.
Only for the 1st time, I am not finding TR and TO values in LTAK table. And subsequent runs I get entries in LTAK in there is a wait time of 5 seconds after bapi call.
I have found 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document with similar issue, but no solution or explanation.
Note 838036 says something similar, but it seems obsolete.
Kindly share your expertise and opinions.
Thanks,
Anil

Hi,
please check if some of following OSS notes are not valid for your problem:
[Note 838036 - AFS: Performance issues during GR with ref. to PO|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/838036]
[Note 391142 - Performance: Goods receipt for inbound delivery|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/391142]
[Note 1414418 - Goods receipt for customer returns: Various corrections|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414418]
The other idea is not to commit each call, but executing commit of packages e.g. after 1000 BAPI calls.
But otherwise, I am afraid you can not do a lot about performance of standard BAPI. Maybe there is some customer enhancement which is taking too long inside the BAPI, but this has to be analysed by you. To analyse performance, just execute your program via tr. SE30.
Regards
Adrian

Bind variable code takes more time to complete?

Hello, My database is oracle11g.
I have same plsql code and first one is without bind variable and second one is with bind variable. Usually, bind variable should take less time. But here
the bind variable takes more time than the regular code... Can any one please explain why?
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered.
SQL> declare
2 cursor c1 is select * from emp where rownum < 50;
3 l_start NUMBER DEFAULT DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME;
4 v_cnt number;
5 begin
6 for i in c1 loop
7 SELECT count(*) into v_cnt
8 FROM rate
9 WHERE rate_id IN (SELECT rate_id
10 FROM ratedetail
11 WHERE benefit_id = i.benefit_id)
12 AND effective_date =
13 TO_DATE ('2011-01-23 00:00:00', 'yyyy-MM-dd HH24:MI:SS')
14 AND rate_type_id = 1;
15 end loop;
16 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('total minutes....'||ROUND(ROUND((DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME - l_start)/100, 2)
/60,3));
17 end;
18 /
total minutes.....06
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered.
SQL>
SQL> declare
2 cursor c1 is select benefit_id from emp where rownum < 50;
3 l_start NUMBER DEFAULT DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME;
4 v_cnt number;
5 begin
6 for i in c1 loop
7 execute immediate 'SELECT count(*)
8 FROM rate
9 WHERE rate_id IN (SELECT rate_id
10 FROM ratedetail
11 WHERE benefit_id = :x)
12 AND effective_date = trunc(sysdate)-202
13 AND rate_type_id = 1'
14 into v_cnt using i.benefit_id;
15 end loop;
16 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('total minutes....'||ROUND(ROUND((DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME - l_start)/100, 2)
/60,3));
17 end;
18 /
total minutes.....061
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>

Shrinika wrote:
Thanks for the clarification.. Now i understand...
One final question on this thread before i close this thread....
My database is set to CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE for some reason. It seems somebody applied a "quick and dirty fix" to "database is slow" problem. BAD PRACTICE
My question is, when we use bind variable, does it parse the sql code every time? or does it reuse the execution plan?
In my database, it reuse the execution plan... Just checking... When we set CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE, it should generate the execution plan
for every unqiue sql code... Is that correct? Am i confusing?If by "parse" you mean a "hard parse" (which generates execution plan), then the answer is NO. As you observed, it reuses execution plan.
For e.g. with CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE setting, following SQLs
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = 10 ;and
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = 20 ;would tend to reuse the same execution plan since both of these will be rewritten by oracle (before execution) as
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = :SYS01 ;Hope this helps.
Edited by: user503699 on Aug 14, 2010 3:55 AM

Query takes more time

Hi,
My emp table contains one milion of records.
delete from emp;
commit;
select count(*)
from emp;
I had perform the above three queries parallely. After applying the commit operation, To retrive the no.of records
in that table it takes some more time after that it display the result zero.
I have faced this question recently in one of the interview. why it is taking some more time..
can any one help me?

Did you read the link provided?
A high water mark is the set of blocks that have at one point contained data. You
might have 1000 blocks allocated to a table but only 500 are under the HWM.
The blocks under the HWM are the blocks that will be read when the table is full scanned. In your sample code, when you insert 1Milion records, the data will reside in some number of blocks - Say 1000. Now the HWM is 1000. When you delete the data, HWM will not get reset..
And after delete, when you count, a FULL TABLE SCAN will happen. Which will scan all the blocks under HWM. So, here 1000 blocks will get read, even if there is no "data". That way your query will take time..
Whats the solution? - Do a TRUNCATE or do a SHRINK.
NOW - Tell us - What is your concern?

Why outlook2011 mac version* takes long time to boot with OSX

why outlook2011 mac version* takes long time to boot with OSX

Okay, so after doing all of the above, the computer still takes between 40 seconds and 1 minute or so to boot up, and the VersionCue messages still appear. However I discovered that the "kdcmond cannot retrieve..." messages disappeared after I disabled my ethernet connections. So at least I know that that had nothing to do with the extended boot-up time.
I have heard that the more RAM you have, the longer it takes to boot due to the RAM count. Since I have 10 GB, maybe this is why?
I've included the most recent Console messages below:
22/4/08 9:56:16 AM com.apple.launchctl.System[2] launchctl: Please convert the following to launchd: /etc/mach_init.d/dashboardadvisoryd.plist
22/4/08 9:56:16 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.adobe.versioncueCS3) Unknown key: ServiceDescription
22/4/08 9:56:16 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (org.cups.cups-lpd) Unknown key: SHAuthorizationRight
22/4/08 9:56:16 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (org.cups.cupsd) Unknown key: SHAuthorizationRight
22/4/08 9:56:16 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (org.ntp.ntpd) Unknown key: SHAuthorizationRight
22/4/08 9:56:39 AM com.apple.SystemStarter[28] Starting Aladdin USB daemon
22/4/08 9:56:39 AM org.ntp.ntpd[25] Error : nodename nor servname provided, or not known
22/4/08 9:56:39 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.UserEventAgent-LoginWindow[74]) Exited: Terminated
22/4/08 9:56:39 AM com.apple.launchctl.Aqua[90] launchctl: Please convert the following to launchd: /etc/machinit_peruser.d/com.adobe.versioncueCS3.monitor.plist
22/4/08 9:56:42 AM com.apple.launchd[82] (0x1011e0.VersionCueCS3monitor) Failed to check-in!

Af:commandNavigationItem takes more time to perform action on screen

For my project there is a dynamic implementation of af:commandNavigationItem and the actions also will be binded during runtime.
This code was working fine with the JDeveloper 11.1.1.0.2 (OWS 10.3.0) Version, but after migrating the code to JDeveloper 11.1.1.2.0 (OWS 10.3.2), it shows hourglass for a longer time (which was unusual) and then it perform the operation.
I ran the project in Debug mode and I found it takes more time to come to the breakpoint.
It writes the below information in console
<UnifiedDialogTag><setVisible> property "visible" setter is using a no-op implementation. Used in extreme cases when the property value, beyond the default value, results in unwanted behavior.
Experts: Please through some light to proceed with this issue as I am looking some lead information from where I have to look into the issue.

Hi,
can you file a bug or provide a testcase ?
Frank

MRP job takes more time (Duration / Sec)

Hello PP Guru’s,
I have below situation in production environment,
MRP job for plant – A (Takes more time – 14.650)
MRP job for plant – B (Takes less time – 4.512)
When I compare the variant / attributes with plant A and B, I observe only difference in attribute is scheduling (2 - Lead Time Scheduling and Capacity Planning) for plant A.
For plant B scheduling (1- Determination of Basic Dates for Planned) it was updated.
So in my observation this scheduling is playing a major role for MRB job which takes more time in plant – A.
I am in process of changing the variant attribute for plant – A from scheduling 2 to scheduling 1.
I wanted to know from experts whether if I change any impact / problem will happen in future for plant A or not.
Please let me know what all the hidden impacts are there if I change the scheduling in variant attribute.
I look forward to your valuable input to reduce time for my MRP related job.
Regards,
Kumar S

Hi Kumar,
You have no need to change the inhouse production time you just need to update the Lot size dependent inhouse production time in work scheduling view of material master. That you can do by scheduling the routing/recipe.
Transactions CA97 or CA97N can be used to update the in-house production time with the information from the routing.
If business don't want to have the capacity planning for planned orders then you change the scheduling from 2 to 1 basic date scheduling.
Expert Caetano already answer you query
The reports listed below can be used to compare the MRP past executions regarding the runtime:
RMMDMONI: This report compares the runtime of the MRP execution and also provides the total of planning elements (planned orders, purchase requisitions, etc) changed, created or deleted. It also shows which planning parameters where used and how much time MRP spent on each step (database read, BOM explosion, MRP calculation, scheduling, BAdIs, etc). With this information is possible to observe the relation of runtime and number of elements changed/created/deleted and also to see on which step MRP is taking more time.
RMMDPERF: This report shows the "material hit list", that means, which materials had the highest runtime during the MRP execution and also on which step MRP is taking more time. Knowing which materials have the highest runtime, allow you to isolate the problem and reproduce it on MD03, where it is possible to run an ABAP or SQL trace for a more detailed analysis.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Why NetWeaver04 DB instance takes more time during 'Database Load' phase?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for