Why should we go for ODI?

Hi,
I know the Informatica 9.1.0. Now , I am learning ODI so getting some questions.
I am working with the Hyperion & ODI is used with the hyperion to fetch data from any source system.
I have few questions in my mind related to ODI.
why should I go for ODI? OR when should I use OID?
what is the benefits getting by ODI that does not available in other tools.
Thanks

It might be worth starting to read through the features of ODI and related documentation to understand it strengths http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/data-integrator/overview/index.html
It is Oracle's strategic integration product so if you are working with EPM products then you will find more features than with Informatica.
I will let someone else provide information on when to use it because I have been here before on many occasions, it can all depend on what products you have currently, what your source/target systems, what your objectives are to whether it is for you.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Similar Messages

HT5622 hey! i have a serious problem coming up which is that i am asked to enter my billing info even for free apps. why should i pay for apps which are free? please help me with this problem!

hey! i have a serious problem coming up which is that i am asked to enter my billing info even for free apps. why should i pay for apps which are free? please help me with this problem! and in the billing info there is pop-up box saying i have accessed my account from didfferent computer but no i have been doing it from the same pc. please help me out.

Tap Settings > General > International. Make sure the Region Format is correct.
As for your Apple ID. Tap Settings > Store > Apple ID > iForgot
Resetting your Apple ID may help.
Congrats on your new iPad !!!

Why should we go for job instead of trigger

hi all,
whats the exact purpose of job n trigger?
why should we go for job instead of trigger?
any one pls help me regarding this
thnaks in advance.

When you have code that is to be called, implementing it with a trigger leaves the process synchronous. In other words: the code is executed within the same transaction as the invoking code. This means real-time, but it makes your transaction heavier. Implementing it with a job, makes it asynchronous. In other words: the code gets executed in another session. Now it is not real-time anymore, but since it is executed in the background, nobody cares anymore how long it takes (to a certain point of course).
Regards,
Rob.

Why Should I go for 11g

Since my database and application running well for long time and not major problems then why should I go for 11g. Why not stick to 10g more 2 to 4 years.
Share your ideas....

Hi there,
I dont think that it matters on this too much that your applications and db are running ( or not running ) fine ovr a version x so you should migrate to y version.I have seen shops still running on 817 also and there are many who have opted for 11g also. There are alot of factors which effect the decision.I wont recommend anyone at the moment to go for 11g as its the first release and the R1 product is not usualy so stable.If I really wish to upgrade , I shall wait for atleast 11gR2 to come.
If you are happy with the performance of 10g and are stable than I dont thikn that you have any drastic need for upgrade to 11g any time soon.
Just my 2 cents....
Aman....

Why should organizations go for PS Benefits (Inhouse) instead of outsourcin

Why should organizations go for PS Benefits (Inhouse) instead of outsourcing to Benefit Administrators like Hewitt etc?

That´s the perfect question for your friendly Oracle PeopleSoft sales person near you.
But I can come up with some points too.
- If you have already PS inhouse, you can leverage the data and the knowhow instead of using yet another system.
- Shorter communication channels.
- Faster reaction times
- More control of who see´s the data

Why should we go for SAP Business One

Hi,
Can any one help me, Why should we implement SAP Business One for SME cant we go for other ERP providers.
Regards
Z Mohammed

Hi Zameer,
Every ERP package has its own advantages & disadvantages. What any company would look for before implemnting an ERP product is the adaptability factor.
A through analysis is done as to what ERP product suits the company's business processes taking various factors into consideration such as budget allocation, resources available, duration of implementation etc.
And only then a company would decide on what ERP package has to be implemented.
SAP Business One is specifically designed by SAP to suit SME businesses............as they dont have complicated business processes and dont requrie full fledged landscape such as R/3.
Note: Do Reward points for the answers you find helpful............that's how you encourage the SDN users to spend time and answer your queries.
Regards
Sai

Why should we pay for software updates

i know that nokia has turned to providing software updates on the internet. But based on my experience if someone has to update their firmware and is not under warranty they hav to pay for the update !
wait a second, i payed(read : invested) in a nokia phone and it dint even work properly for one straight day & to sort this problem(which started by me doing nothign but buying a nokia phone) i have to PAY for an update!
this means i as an investor am wrong? i should not buy nokia phones?
YES
because as a corporate business nokia doesnt have the decency to correct their own mistakes.
This is unethical business practice.
PS: i bought N73 from dubai and am in uk as of now, so cannot use the warranty to get a free update- but cmon its not my mistake that the software has bugs, nokia should take its responsibility.
i regret buying a nokia

Nokia do sell phones all over the world, this is correct. But one thing you miss here is that they do not sell the same phones all over the world.
Phones sold in the US are for the US market, so this could mean they are CDMA in design, use such technology as BREW etc. Phones sold in the middle east and in APAC will also cater to the needs of this area, such as chtml and imode as well as different menu structures and character sets in the phones font.
Creating a support network that can repair a damaged phone or updgrade a faulty phone anywhere in the world would be a bad thing. For one thing, the cost. If such a service existed this would be passed on to the end user, this would mean customers in the US who never leave their country would be paying for the support services (even if never used) for a customer in China who regularly travels to Austrlia and may need a firmware update or repair done anywhere in between.
The only thing Nokia really needs to address is hardware repairs. It would not be beyond the realms of reasonable to have a hardware repair service at premium for imported phones (people travelling could wait until they arrive home or mail back to their country). However the update system that Nokia now has in place on the Internet and OTA simply means you do not need to go into a shop to update your phone. You either connect to your pc or just start the update from the phone itself.
One final note, no one pays for the update, you only pay for the service. This is why OTA updates are free (apart from the data charges) and so are Internet updates (apart for the monthly charge etc) Message Edited by karym6 on 15-Dec-2006
02:10 PM

Why should I pay for upgrade to CS6 twice?

Dear Adobe,
I upgraded from photoshop CS3 to Photoshop CS5 last November as you said we will be not able to upgrade from CS3 to CS6 directly anymore. And now, you changed your mind and users are still able to upgrade from older versions. If I would wait couple of months like others I would pay only once. Please, would you try to explain your business strategy? How should we trust you are not going to change your mind and rules every month?
Thank you for your explanation.
Kind regards,
Filip Zamorsky

And...Add my name to the list. I began another thread but I was told about this one. It's the same story as you all, I'm just not going to be ignored by customer service. Adobe caused the problem, Adobe should fix it.
Has anybody found a magic way to get customer service help? I have been waiting since last Tuesday for my problem to be resolved and I've been getting absolutely no understanding or willingness to take ownership of my problem. I have chatted online with 8 different people. Each time making painstaking attemts to explain the situation as being different than the "free upgrade" window that is posted on adobe.com.
Here is the situation.
Adobe said that we MUST upgrade to CS5 in order to upgrade to CS6.
In February, I upgraded from CS4 to CS5 based on item 1.
I went online last week to upgrade to CS6 from CS5 when I saw that I didn't have to spend the money to upgrade from CS4 to CS5 afterall.
Based on that, I feel I should be able to upgrade to CS6 without having to pay an addition $199.00.
Adobe said I had to upgrade so I did. That cost me $199.00 three months ago.
Now Adobe wants me to spend another $199.00 to get CS6.
I will not do that. I wouldn't have spent the first $199.00 if Adobe hadn't said it was necessary. It wasn't necessary afterall so I shouldn't be penalized for believing Adobe.
This is like the guy who's told he has a week to live so he gives away all of his earthly belongings. Then the doctor tells him he didn't mean it.
Now, On Wednesday, I got my request elevated to "concern group". They will contact me within 72 hours. That must be 72 business hours because I have not been concated.
So, Monday, I had to go through the entire scenerio for the umteenth time and again was assured the "concern group" would contact me withing 24 hours. I didn't believe the rep, based on my previous lack of contact and asked how I can contact the "concern group" myself so I don't have to go through this entire process again. The "concern group" is offline, no way to contact them but "I ASSURE YOU" you will hear from them withing 24 hours. Well, 48 hours later, I'm totally in a very hateful mood. I opened another chat session and rather than submitting that person on the other end to my venom, I just pasted my chat from Monday and said goodbye. Of couse, it's not going to do any good either.
I saw a message board online yesterday, and today I can't find it, where people in my same situation received their upgrade to CS6 with no addition cost.
I know it's being done but Customer service is so...aggravating that I believe it's a way to make people just give up and go away. Not this time.

ESOA : Why should we choose ESOA

Hi experts!!!
I recently entered into esoa practice. I have so many queries to put in.... Here are a few....
1) how customer gets benifit out of this esoa...??? how it solves customer problems in present market.??
2) In which form these services are served? (wsdl/ any common format acceptable by all kinds of applications or it is completely based on Netweaver platform?)
3) If it is a wsdl, why should we go for PI 7.1 only...we can also generate wsdls from all previous versions ?
4) According to my understanding from all the blogs & forums, all services will be developed and registered in ESR ( which resides locally in my company), then how these services are said to be global??
5) what is the big difference PI 7.1 makes over the previous versions?
6) How ES workplace is helpfull to my development?
7) I have installed ESR & CE 7.1 into my system.. but i am unable to find proper support from SDN ? Is it still have to come up? or Is no one using PI7.1 yet? or any other reasons??
8) and most imortantly, I have not found any architectural details about ESR or PI 7.1 or CE 7.1. please ignore this question if i m wrong.
It would be great help to all...
Regards,
Pavani

Hi Pavani,
Lot of questions. If you have gone through the ESOA Architecture/framework, you would have find answers to most of your questions.
> 1) how customer gets benifit out of this esoa...??? how it solves customer problems in present market.??
SOA architecture is spreading with a good pace. Its always better to walk with market trends.
Customer can benfit from less implementation costs, fast implementations and finally the maintainace would be quite easier with ESOA
> 2) In which form these services are served? (wsdl/ any common format acceptable by all kinds of applications or it is completely based on Netweaver platform?)
Yes it is WSDL. It is based on standards and acceptable to all SAP, Non-SAP applications.
>
> 3) If it is a wsdl, why should we go for PI 7.1 only...we can also generate wsdls from all previous versions ?
PI 7.1 contains ESR where you can define/design your new Enterprise services with some governace mechanism. Technically Enterprise Services are Web Services but it has strong governance mechanism. You can develop/define simple web services from previous PI versions.
> 4) According to my understanding from all the blogs & forums, all services will be developed and registered in ESR ( which resides locally in my company), then how these services are said to be global??
Nope, they will be developed in ESR( Enterprise Services Repository) and would be registered in Service Registry not ESR.
>
> 5) what is the big difference PI 7.1 makes over the previous versions?
PI 7.1 is coming with lot of new features, but related to ESOA , main is the ESR.
> 6) How ES workplace is helpfull to my development?
ES Workplace provide test servers where SAP has already hosted implemented services. You can consume that services using your applications. And documentation is provided along every Enterprise Service. SAP has hosted ES Woorkplace for evaluation purpose only
> 7) I have installed ESR & CE 7.1 into my system.. but i am unable to find proper support from SDN ? Is it still have to come up? or Is no one using PI7.1 yet? or any other reasons??
A lot of documentation is available and also forums are available for both CE and ESR. But it will take time to reach at atht level when compared to other Netweaver products
> 8) and most imortantly, I have not found any architectural details about ESR or PI 7.1 or CE 7.1. please ignore this question if i m wrong.
Go through recent Teched Material, you will find a lot.
Hope this helps.
regards,
Piyush

Systemd: why am I waiting for wicd/mysqld?

Recently I moved from init scripts to systemd. The available guide ensured a smooth transition.
Nobody got harmed in the process.
But: booting is slower since then. As can be seen below, I'm waiting quite some time for the mysqld and wicd daemons.
➜ systemd-analyze blame
17482ms mysqld.service
10968ms wicd.service
5786ms gdm.service
4176ms colord.service
3768ms systemd-logind.service
1109ms systemd-vconsole-setup.service
801ms systemd-remount-fs.service
761ms systemd-udevd.service
742ms sys-kernel-debug.mount
723ms console-kit-log-system-start.service
719ms dev-mqueue.mount
706ms systemd-binfmt.service
659ms rc-local.service
640ms dev-hugepages.mount
596ms systemd-user-sessions.service
590ms proc-sys-fs-binfmt_misc.mount
548ms systemd-udev-trigger.service
397ms accounts-daemon.service
308ms polkit.service
246ms systemd-sysctl.service
243ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service
186ms udisks.service
107ms upower.service
86ms console-kit-daemon.service
61ms rtkit-daemon.service
22ms udisks2.service
18ms home.mount
13ms tmp.mount
1ms sys-fs-fuse-connections.mount
This seems odd to me. Since systemd starts services in parallel and is capable of starting them 'on the fly' when needed, why should I wait for them at boot?
Is there a way to start stuff like `mysqld.service` and `wicd.service` later? For example, after `gdm.service` is done, allowing me to sign in and do stuff?
As suggested by the guide I made sure all services are started at boot by running
systemctl enable <service-name>
for every service in my former DEAMONS array.
Last edited by A.J.Rouvoet (2012-11-07 22:53:50)

lothar_m wrote:
in my machine netcfg really takes some time too.
$systemd-analyze blame
16072ms netcfg.service
9595ms i2prouter.service
4164ms postgresql.service
2331ms udisks2.service
2010ms systemd-vconsole-setup.service
1896ms systemd-logind.service
Off topic: Nice Blackadder Quote you have as a signature ;-)

HT5012 Why should I click the accept button for a server certificate at every initial time although it is listed as a trusted root CA on iOS6?

I'm now using a root CA which was listed above.
But when I try to connect WLAN via EAP with RADIUS initially, I should click the accept button for the certificate of the RADIUS Server.
Why should it work?

Hi,
I'm still looking for the reason.
Isn't there any way which can avoid the verification for a public certificate of authentication server using EAP-TLS.
Why should I click the accept button in initial step for authenticating with RADIUS server using EAP-TLS although the root CA of the server certificate is listed in the default trusted CA on iOS?

Why should we select all key fields when using for all entries

Hi,
Why should we select all key fields in our select query when using for all entries statement?
I read about for all entries but this point was not clear in any post.
Please explain me
Regards,
Subhashini

Dear Subhasini,
It is because FOR ALL ENTRIES deletes the duplicate entries before populating the target internal table.
Please do an F1 on FOR ALL ENTRIES & read the SAP documentation.
I mean how duplicate entries will not get deleted when we use this?
Quite simple, if you select all key fields then each entry will be unique & there will not be any duplicate entries to delete !!
BR,
Suhas
Edited by: Suhas Saha on Oct 16, 2009 9:41 AM

Why should I use BO BI 4.0 for my existing SAP NetWeaver ?

Dear Sirs,
Question about BusinessObjects BI 4.0 & SAP Netweaver 7.0.
In my company we use NetWeaver for a year. We have some reports on portal, so we have some analysis via www. It seemed to me that this is enough for us.
Now on the market is available new version of BusinessObjects - version 4.0.
My question is :
Why should I use BO BI 4.0 for my SAP BW?
What will I gain by implementing BO BI 4.0 in conjunction with SAP BW?
Can I use existing reports on the new platform?
Can you give some links to documents, presentations and notes to answer these questions?
Best regards,
Emmo

Hi Emmo2000,
Please see my answers below:
Why should I use BO BI 4.0 for my SAP BW?
What will I gain by implementing BO BI 4.0 in conjunction with SAP BW?
Please see this SDN article which covers a lot of the new features of BI4.0 :
/people/ingo.hilgefort/blog/2011/03/24/sap-integration-update-9--should-you-start-with-sap-businessobjects-40-or-wait-for-41
Can I use existing reports on the new platform?
There is the ability to integrate BexWeb applications via our BI Launchpad. I'm not sure if this is what you are referring to but the following should clarify:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BOBJ/HowtointegrateBExWebApplicationsintoBI4.x
Can you give some links to documents, presentations and notes to answer these questions?
For detailed information on the BI4.0 suite, I would direct you towards our product documentation:
http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/
I hope this is helpful and fully answers your question.
Kind regards,
John

Why does Adobe believe Australians should pay more for software?

Why does Adobe believe Australians should pay more for software?
For Photoshop and premier elements bundle in the USA price is USD $119.99
For Australia AUD $185.00 which at the current exchange rate of 1.067 is USD $173 or 44% more.
Thanks Adobe.

seeing its only a software download, then why should we have to pay $15 more for the same product? we already are charged extra for music now we're being slugged for software as well.... maybe an apple exec could give me a reason on this question...
This is a peer-to-peer forum. If you want a response from Apple, you would have to contact them directly with such a question. A better question might be what are the direct and indirect duties and fees (Goods and Services Tax, Import Tax/Tariff, sales taxes, etc.) assessed by the Australian Customs and Border Protection Service and/or local tax agencies and/or municipalities for intellectual properties imported electronically. There may be quite a few agencies wanting a piece of your pie.

CCMS is used for system monitoring , why should we use solution manage ?

CCMS is used for system monitoring , why should we use solution manage ?
Whats the relationship between CCMS system and SolMan?
Thank you .

hi,
I just want to ask a question. At our client we have solution manager and CCMS. There is data in CCMS I can extract, it is loading on BW side ok the same number of recs, but the problem on CCMS cubes says there are the same number of record in the cube and also showing as the data is ready for the reporting. But when I run the report and view the data as listcube it is empty.
ANy of you have the situation like this cube say it has the data but when do th BEX or infocube contents the cube is empty nothing in there. The same thing is happening with hourly, 15 minute and daily cubes.
Anyhelp on this matter is appreciated

Why should we go for ODI?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for