Widescreen Matte dissolve problem

Bit confused on this.
My dissolves no longer work when a widescreen matte is applied to the clip. When the matte is removed, the dissolve works perfectly.
Any ideas?
Thanks

Marc
Try making your edits without the widescreen matte. When done, nest that sequence in a new one and apply the matte here to the whole nested sequence.
Hope that makes sense !
  Alberto

Similar Messages

  • Widescreen Matte Filter and dissapearing dissolves

    If I apply a widescreen matte filter my dissolves dissapear from the monitor (not the timeline). What can I do to keep the dissolves while applying the widescreen matte filter?
    Thanks

    If you step through the dissolve frame by frame does
    it appear to work?
    Make sure everything is rendered in the timeline
    (option-r).
    Everything is rendered but now I have noticed the problem persists in some footage in the edit. This footage has exactly the same specs as the other footage in the edit where this does not occur. I'm confused.
    PowerBook G4 12   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

  • Widescreen matte problem

    I have some footage that is shot in both 4x3 and letterbox. I planned to do all my editing and then use the widescreen matte over my finished sequences to make them all uniform. When doing a test however I found that in the sequences where I had a dissolve, say a fade to black that the dissolve was messed up after I added the widescreen matte. The footage got blotchy red colored.
    Does anyone know why this is happening and is there a work around? What's the best way to work with letterbox and 4x3 footage?

    There are probably several good ways, but when I wanted to do aomething similar in a project, I made a luma matte (mine was "sculpted") and composited the footage using Travel Matte - Luma.
    As long as your matte for the 4:3 footage matches the 9:16 format, it should be painless.

  • How do i apply a widescreen matt to a rotated clip without the matt rotating too?

    Hi,
    I'm new to this.... but i have a problem...
    Basically some of my footage isn't straight and i rotate it a little but obviously i have the black in the gaps where the image has moved.... but to combat that i want to apply a widescreen matte (which is being applied to the rest of the film anyway)..
    BUT when i apply to matte it rotates to the image.... is there anyway to stop this?
    Thanks

    apply a matte to the layer above.
    You can create one in Photoshop,
    or download my Letterboxer Plugin (free, and I guess will not work in FCP X. :-(
    Or use the one Andy Mees has built. ( http://web.me.com/andymees/Free_and_Easy/main/Entries/2008/1/23_Andy%E2%80%99s_L etterbox_2.html )
    Rienk

  • Strange 'Ghost Lines' on Widescreen Matte in FCP 5

    Since upgrading to FCP 5, I've noticed that whenever I use the Widescreen Matte on a clip in the timeline with another clip layered underneath it (which has the same WS matte on it), I see these strange white fuzzy lines around the edge of the matte. They're very faint, but were obvious enough to have a client point them out. If I eliminate the clip underneath, it usually gets rid of them. But it makes it very troublesome to do layered dissolves and such. At times, I've had to use two black slugs to 'cover up' the edge of the matte, and essentially create my own WS matte. Has anyone else noticed this? FCP 5 bug maybe?

    probably better to nest the layered dissolves sequence and apply the widescreen matte to the nest
    alternatively, as you suggest, just create your own widescreen matte with slugs, or make a matte in photoshop (or you can download a widescreen matte generator plugin from Dave Slater's ProAppTips website at http://proapptips.com/tips/filemgmt/singlefile.php?lid=23 ... i think you'll need to register to access the page)
    hope it helps
    Andy

  • Widescreen matte and render times

    trying to apply a 2.35:1 matte to my sequence using filters/matte/widescreen/2.35... but it seems to require a long time to render even one clip after it's been placed in the timeline... is there a way to apply a 2.35 matte and not have these long render times?... thanks.

    here are two solutions for your problem:
    1) Make your own widescreen bars out of black mattes and place them in the tracks above your video.
    2) Nest your edited sequence (the one with the motion) into another sequence and put the widescreen matte on that one.
    #2 is the preferred route. #1 would just make for more rendering time.
    Worth remembering that when you letterbox a 4:3 movie, for the best result you need to assess each shot's composition as it stands after the letterbox has been added. Each shot may need to be reframed, perhaps a little resizing too to push out distracting edging from otherwise obscured elements. For this reason alone #1 is by far the better approach. As for rendering, you will need to do so regardless of method.
    Good luck
    Andy

  • Widescreen Matte and Motion

    I have put a widescreen matte over my project and it looks great. The only problem is when I try to use motion (zoom in on a photograph for instance) the entire frame zooms, including the widescreen. So essentially the frame turns into fullscreen and it looks very awkward. I don't see a way to put the matte on a higher level than the motion. Does anyone know a way I can solve this? Thanks in advance for any help. -Pat

    here are two solutions for your problem:
    1) Make your own widescreen bars out of black mattes and place them in the tracks above your video.
    2) Nest your edited sequence (the one with the motion) into another sequence and put the widescreen matte on that one.
    #2 is the preferred route. #1 would just make for more rendering time.
    Worth remembering that when you letterbox a 4:3 movie, for the best result you need to assess each shot's composition as it stands after the letterbox has been added. Each shot may need to be reframed, perhaps a little resizing too to push out distracting edging from otherwise obscured elements. For this reason alone #1 is by far the better approach. As for rendering, you will need to do so regardless of method.
    Good luck
    Andy

  • Applying widescreen matte to still photos in motion

    I shot some footage for a documentary using my Canon XL2, 16:9 format. I'm adding some still photos using motion. Is it possible to apply the Widescreen matte effect so the photos match the widescreen look of my footage? I can't figure out how.

    Use the Photoshop preset for DV/D1 widescreen as a template and paste your photos into that.
    You will need to use Photoshop's Transform controls to frame your photos and have to decide what part of the top and/or bottom gets cropped off.
    If you want to zoom or pan, use the original photos in Motion and make sure the photo fills the screen at its smallest size. Again, you will have to sacrifice the top or bottom of the photo to some extent.
    If you absolutely must see all of the photo's content, consider using a complimentary background fill, perhaps with some blurring. Place your photo on top and shrink it down to within the safe area.

  • Widescreen matte disappears on export.

    i put a widescreen matte on my entire timeline. my project is 1440x1080. if i look at it from desktop preview i can see the letterboxing on the top and bottom. Can't see it in the canvas though. When i export the timeline to 853x480 or anything smaller than 1440x1080, there is no widescreen matte.
    i don't know why this does not work. I just want a scaled down version of what can be seen in desktop preview.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.

    Thank you for all of you responses. everything is as it should be.
    Now i have to go back and redo my music videos titles to fit the letterbox.
    I very much appreciate your help.
    the answer is
    1 create new sequence.
    2 drag current sequence into new sequence.
    3 drag new timeline of new sequence into the monitor window.
    4 go to video filters and choose widescreen matte.
    5 set it to 2.35 .1
    6 it should be reflected in the canvas window.
    be aware that you may have to readjust your titles.

  • Widescreen Matte to a Sequence

    I just cut a sequence however I had to alter the size of some of the cuts. I would like to add a matte(widescreen)over the entire sequence. I've tried selecting all the cuts, double clicking on that entire selection, then dragging the widescreen filter on to that selection, but it just doesn't work. What am I doing wrong?

    try nesting first and then applying the widescreen matte filter to the nest
    an alternative is to create a matte in photoshop and place that above the other clips in your sequnece, or use a couple of slugs cropped to provide the upper and lower mattes, or just one slug with the mask shape filter applied so as to create a widescreen cutout to your clips below...
    or you can use my widescreen matte generator which you can place on a higher track and away you go. you can get it here: http://homepage.mac.com/andymees
    cheers
    Andy

  • Widescreen matte on rotated shots

    I'm shooting on a DVX 100 in letterbox mode. In FCP 5 I enlarge and rotate some of my clips, then wish to apply a widescreen matte so these rotated/enlarged clips conform to the widescreen of all of my other clips.
    When I apply widescreen filter, nothing happens.
    Any ideas? Or am I missing something?
    Thanks.

    I bet you enlarged (scaled) the images to for, so that you just don't see the matte anymore. They scale with the clip. As they do rotate also.
    Obviously you'll need to build a matte on the top layer to have a consistent matte.
    Create one in Photoshop or use my free plugin:
    http://www.rienq.dds.nl/fcp.
    The photoshop-way renders faster by the way. My plugin is easier in the way that you can use it within FCP. You can decide yourself.
    Rienk

  • How do you fix a dissolve problem cause by a matte?

    I use a 4 point matte to eliminate unwanted background but when i do a dissolve with a title, the matte shows up as a reduced luminosity in the title.
    I have tried playing around with opacity without a resolution to the issue.
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks!

    I tried nesting and it had no impact.  I changed the blend mode on opacity to "pin light" and that fixed the issue for the titles where the title was on video 2 and the main video was on video 1
    But the problem still remains where I am dissolving to adjacent clips on video 1 as seen below.  The area where the matte exists does not seem to be subject to the dissolve.

  • Widescreen matte with dissolve shift position

    We were using FCP 6.0 on PAL projects.
    After we add the widescreen filter to 2 clips and make a dissolve between them, the black matte change size during the dissolve and back to normal after dissolve.
    This only happen in FCP 6.02 and it were fine in FCP 5.0.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks in advance.
    Mike

    Make sure that the clips are fully rendered... no coloured bars above the timeline.
    rh

  • Dip to Color Dissolve + Widescreen Matte

    Forum,
    When my Dip to Color Dissolve comes in my black bars (wide screen matte) are trumped by the dissolve.
    I'm looking for a way to keep the bars all the way through the end of the Dip to Color Dissolve.
    No such luck yet.
    Thanks to anyone that can help,
    Trey

    The good thing about nesting though is that you can adjust the clips in the original sequence and then they'll update in the nest.
    Else check this out too:
    http://web.mac.com/andymees/Freeand_Easy/main/Entries/2008/1/23_Andy’s_Letterbox2.html
    CaptM

  • 2 pass VBR dissolve problems poll?

    OK,
    This is driving me nuts and I'm curious how many others are in the same boat. When encoding to m2v in 2 pass mode, no matter what I do about 1/2 my dissolves turn into blotchy messes. Apple tells me I'm the first (and only) one to report this problem. Working with apple I have tried everything they had to offer and no improvement. I have read the discussions and have tried those other fixes posted (i.e. inserting encoding markers in trouble spots).
    I am curious how many of you are in the same spot? Have you actually tried to trouble shoot with Apple Tech Support? Did they basically give up on you like they have on me (even though the problem has not been solved Apple says they will only continue to talk with me if I buy the 799 per year support package) Has anyone found an actual fix to this issue?
    Also I have tried downloading some demo's of other encoders. Using the same test file (a self contained QT) I have none of the same problems. The best one so far has been MCCoder, but have not been able to get the audio to work with that. The video was even better than Bitvice. I must admit I really like the look of the video that comes out of compressor in 2 pass vbr mode, but if I can't get the dissolves to work its useless.
    I'm not thrilled that it looks like my only alternative is going to be to buy a new encoder. It does not seem right to me that if there is a problem with this software that Apple is not taking responsibility to fix it. My thought is if there were enough of us this with the same issue, somehow we could make something happen. Perhaps Apple is counting on either there are not enough of us, or that we won't be able to communicate with each other and organize.
    I remain,
    frustrated in San Francisco
    Art B.

    I think, encode markers are something that should not be needed unless trying to squeeze the last bit of quality out of a low(-ish) bitrate encode. Dissolves and scene changes and such are something a compressor should detect by itself and act accordingly - but this is just an opinion on how things should be.
    Burner issues should be easy to distinguish from compressor issues. Issues caused by burner will probably manifest themselves similar to a scratched DVD or a bad signal in digital television broadcast, whereas issues from Compressor should appear less "out-of-the-place" (for example, a green square in the middle of sky would be out-of-the-place)
    Maybe you could put your reference .mov online along with the bad .m2v encode of it and let others with good compressor setups take a shot at encoding it.

Maybe you are looking for