Will E31 quadro 600 card support 2 monitors?

I am planning to order an E31 sff, and I am wondering if the quadro 600 video card on E31 sff can support 2 monitors.The spec says the card has two connnectors, but didn't say whether it can support 2 monitors.
Also, I am planning to put a samsung 840 pro ssd into the E31 sff. Is there any compatibility problems?

Historically you'd see better performance by spreading the memory out to utilize all the channels...so in the case of E31 (which I believe has 4 slots...2 channels populated at 2 DIMMs per channel), you'd probably be better off with the 2x4GB config.
It's been a while since I looked at performance data for this scenario, but even back then the performance difference was on the order of maybe 1-3% benefit.  I'd be willing to bet most users wouldn't notice that difference in either direction. 
If you want to save some cash, no issues going with the 2x4GB config.  If you had fewer slots on the board, it could be a concern for future upgrades/expandability, but you should be fine.

Similar Messages

  • Will the T4i AV out support monitoring audio as a movie is being shot?

    I'm using a T4i to shoot videos and wonder if the AV out will support monitoring the audio as it's being recorded by pluging in a head phone with correct plugs/adaptors, etc.?

    Hi Mikezerby,
    The AV Out terminal is not designed to allow audio monitoring during a movie shoot.
    Did this answer your question? Please click the Accept as Solution button so that others may find the answer as well.

  • Caution, nVIDIA Quadro FX cards may not support DirextX 11

    Anyone thinking or acquiring any of these cards be careful if DirectX 11 is something you will need in the future.
    During September when researching the Quadro FX cards one of my criteria was that it supports DirectX 11.
    At that time their latest driver version indicated it does support DirectX 11.  Only recently when running a program that requires it did I find out the card does not support DirectX 11  !
    So now I've got to look at something else to replace this card.  Anyone here want it?
    Not so cheerful,
    Michael

    The card in question is the Quadro FX 3800.
    However, my colleague has the Quadro FX 4800 and will run into the same problem.
    Regarding running the DirectX update from Microsoft, the answer is yes I did.
    The NVIDA Customer Care representative's response was as follows (I really wish one could copy and paste this):
    "I apologize for the inconvenience.  I must add though that the 259.81 Driver Package is generic to a lot of devices.  The idea behind this is to streamline the process of driver packaging.  Whilst the 259.81 drivers support DX 11 it requires a card to support DX 11 to work successfully."
    Checking NVIDIA's product lineup this means only the 5000 series and up support DirectX 11.
    What disturbes me, that there is no mention in the driver's web site description indicating this card is excluded.  To the contrary it is listed as being included!
    As well the fact that this "customer care" representative alludes to my incompitence in not checking the specifications...
    Cheers
    Michael

  • Will my HP-6640f pc support 2 monitors?

    Not too computer saavy here.
    Will my HP-6640f pc support 2 monitors as is, or will I need additional hardware? The current 22" dell monitor is connected to the tower via a VGA connection. Right next to the VGA is a DVI port. Is this where I plug in the 2nd monitor? Thanks!
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Resolution...yours is 1680 x 1050. If you go with a full HD (1920 x 1080) everything will seem smaller but obviously more of the web page or document or whatever you are looking at will be on the screen. I use a 1920 x 1080 as the primary monitor and then extend the desktop onto a 1680 x 1050 where I just keep my Outlook email open all day. Everything else I do on the full HD monitor. Works well for me. Here is HP's current 22 inch offering in full HD:
    http://www.shopping.hp.com/en_US/home-office/-/products/Accessories/Monitors/C4D30AA?HP-Pavilion-22x...
    It has a DVI input. 

  • I have been using my DEBIT card for over a year but recently I had to update my billing information, since then it will not accept my card. All the information is correct, it's just telling me to visit iTunes support. Can someone help me? Much appreciated

    I have been using my DEBIT card for over a year but recently I had to update my billing information, since then it will not accept my card. All the information is correct, it's just telling me to visit iTunes support. Can someone help me? Much appreciated

    Debit card? Are you sure?
    USA iTunes Store does not appear to accept debit cards - http://www.apple.com/legal/itunes/us/terms.html  "The iTunes Store, Mac App Store, App Store, and iBookstore services (“Services”) accept these forms of payment: credit cards issued by U.S. banks, payments through your PayPal account, iTunes Cards, iTunes Store Gift Certificates, Content Codes, and Allowance Account balances."

  • HT201471 will my iPad model A1337 support the square for credit card transactions?

    will my ipad model A1337 support the Square for credit card transactions for my small business?

    hi there lorieaw
    try izettle.com we use their software & chip & pin reader its awesome.
    Santy72

  • Will AE ever work with / support the Nvidia GTX-970 cards?

    Will AE ever work with / support the Nvidia GTX-970 cards?

    All features but one already work with these cards. The one exception is the GPU acceleration oft he ray-traced 3D renderer, which is an obsolete feature that is being phased out.
    details:
    GPU (CUDA, OpenGL) features in After Effects

  • Which MSI card supports the apple 30"

    There are so many video cards out there and theories about which card will run this monitor, i almost wasted a lot of money trying to run the monitor on my 6800GT... it doenst i have tried both DVI ports.
    Basically i want to know which MSI card supports the apple 30" does the new 7800? the old 6800 ultra? is my 6800GT messed?
    A few things i can confirm are this, the monitor because of some signal issues DOES NOT support SLI at all.
    I have read a few reviews that say the 7800GTX does not support this monitor - very disappointing i have to look for an older 6800 card.... - this is unconfirmed maybe someone can get back to me about this.
    Anyways if MSI could tell us which card of theirs works i will turf my 6800GT and buy whatever is needed.

    I can't be shure which MSI card support it, but reading the release notes from the latest nvidia drivers (77.22) I saw this:
    The GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MB works in single card mode with Apple 30 inch HD Cinema panel. However, an issue has been discovered when running the GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MB card in SLI mode with an Apple 30 inch HD Cinema display. This is due to an interaction
    between the GPU, the application, and the ability to scale to nonnative panel resolutions of the Apple display.
    All GeForce 6 series GPUs will work with Apple 23 and 20 inch HD Cinema displays in single GPU mode. NVIDIA recommends using the GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MB with the Apple 30 inch HD Cinema Display line only in non-SLI modes.
    Edit here:
    Modes Supported for High Resolution Displays:
    Display:
    *Apple 30” Cinema HD Display (Dual link DVI)
    Hardware Requirements:
     *All High-end Quadro FX (see list of products in “Quadro FX Family of High End GPUs”
     * GeForce 6800 with 512 MB
    Maximum Resolution:
    2560x1600 @ 60Hz
    Source: 77.22 Forceware Release Notes.
    I guess that your card (6800 GT Non Ultra) doesn't support it. Maybe a new drievers release will fix this.

  • Can I install nvidia quadro 600/ AMD FirePro V4900 (ATI FireGL) on HPE h8-1220t ?

    HP/Nvidia Quadro 600 graphics card hangs w/ blue hp startp screen after installation into HPE h8-1220t.
    Error: After installation and startup, just it sounds a 'beep' and after a minute, it beeps again. No further progess w/ HP blue screen. 
    Notes: Card spec
    nVIdia Quadro 600 by pny
    Frame Buffer Memory 1 GB DDR3 Memory Interface 128-bit Memory Bandwidth 25.6 GB/s CUDA parallel processing cores 96 Max Power Consumption 40 W Energy Star Compliant Yes Physical Dimensions 2.713" H x 6.60" L Single Slot Low Profile Form Factor Yes Display Connectors DVI-I (1), DP (1) Number of Displays Supported 2 DisplayPort Yes DVI Yes VGA Yes Graphics Bus PCI Express 2.0 x16 Thermal Solution Active 3D Vision Pro Support Via USB Warranty 3 Year Warranty PNY Part # VCQ600-PB
    I contacted both HP and PNY customer support. They've not found any solution yet.
    Only the suggestion I heard from HP customer support is change the graphic card w/ PCIe 3.0 support.
    I believe PCI slot should be backward compatible w/ 2.0 version. 
    Does it really matter install PCIe2.0 graphic board on 3.0 slot?
    My ohter option is AMD FirePRo V4900, which is one of the certified graphic card for the Autodesk.
    However, I'm not sure wether it works with this machine.
    Please give me an answer.
    Kyoo

    masterqueue wrote:
    HP/Nvidia Quadro 600 graphics card hangs w/ blue hp startp screen after installation into HPE h8-1220t.
    Error: After installation and startup, just it sounds a 'beep' and after a minute, it beeps again. No further progess w/ HP blue screen. 
    Notes: Card spec
    nVIdia Quadro 600 by pny
    Frame Buffer Memory 1 GB DDR3 Memory Interface 128-bit Memory Bandwidth 25.6 GB/s CUDA parallel processing cores 96 Max Power Consumption 40 W Energy Star Compliant Yes Physical Dimensions 2.713" H x 6.60" L Single Slot Low Profile Form Factor Yes Display Connectors DVI-I (1), DP (1) Number of Displays Supported 2 DisplayPort Yes DVI Yes VGA Yes Graphics Bus PCI Express 2.0 x16 Thermal Solution Active 3D Vision Pro Support Via USB Warranty 3 Year Warranty PNY Part # VCQ600-PB
    I contacted both HP and PNY customer support. They've not found any solution yet.
    Only the suggestion I heard from HP customer support is change the graphic card w/ PCIe 3.0 support.
    I believe PCI slot should be backward compatible w/ 2.0 version. 
    Does it really matter install PCIe2.0 graphic board on 3.0 slot?
    My ohter option is AMD FirePRo V4900, which is one of the certified graphic card for the Autodesk.
    However, I'm not sure wether it works with this machine.
    Please give me an answer.
    Kyoo
    Hello masterqueue.
    This desktop was a CTO (Configured-to-Order) model.  As such, there is a lot of information I do not know about the machine.  Most importantly, how large is the power supply?  According to the computer's specification page it could have anywhere from a 300 watt to a 600 watt power supply.  That is a very big difference.
    I'll keep an eye out for your response.  Have a great day.
    Please click the white star under my name to give me Kudos as a way to say "Thanks!"
    Click the "Accept as Solution" button if I resolve your issue.

  • Nvidia Quadro 600, GeForce GTX 560 Ti or cheaper for Photoshop CS5 and Lightroom 3?

    Hello,
    I am a professional photographer and I am setting up a new PC (i7, Windows 7 64bit). But I have some troubles to choose the graphic card.
    I use Lightroom and Photoshop CS5 3, no video editing.
    Between the Open GL, Open CL, CUDA accelerations etc ... professional graphic cards models and consumer ones I am lost!
    The Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti seems more powerful and more versatile but I tell myself that if Nvidia has professional range there must be a reason.
    So in Photoshop CS5 and Lightroom 3 what would be the best: GeForce GTX 560 Ti or Nvidia Quadro 600?
    http://www.geforce.com/Hardware/GPUs/geforce-gtx-560ti/specifications
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-quadro-600-us.html
    Any reason to get a Quadro 2000?
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-quadro-2000-us.html
    Or the graphic card doesn’t matter much and I should take an entry-level GeForce to enjoy the HDMI and the silence? Which one then?
    Does the Quadro 600 manages 10bits display 10bits? And the Geforce?
    Any change announced with Photoshop CS6 and Ligthroom4?
    The only 3D application I use is Google Earth in 3D mode, does it make any difference?
    Thank you for your help.

    You say "no video editing"...  If that's going to be the case, and you won't use the Mercury engine in the Adobe Premiere Pro package, which needs the nVidia Cuda subsystem, then I recommend you consider the ATI brand over nVidia.
    Why?
    Because while neither brand's developers (ATI or nVidia) always release perfect drivers, I find ATI display drivers to be of consistently higher quality than that of nVidia releases.  What this means to you is generally fewer crashes or quirks.  ATI has also traditionally supported older cards into the future better than nVidia - this might matter to you in a few years.
    People ask me what video card I would recommend, and right now that would be a VisionTek ATI Radeon HD 6670 1 GB GDDR5 card.  I like this particular card because:
    I've had 100% success with VisionTek cards in a number of different systems, not only initially but they have all run as long as I have used them, without ever breaking down.
    The 6670 model uses very little power (under 70 watts) and as such doesn't stress your computer's power supply, need a separate power connection, nor make a lot of fan noise. 
    It's not the fastest card made for 3D gaming, but it's inexpensive and excellent for Photoshop.  No matter what you choose, you should get a card that scores over 500 on the Passmark GPU benchmark, ideally over 1000:  http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/
    The ATI Catalyst display driver implementations for the 4670/5670/6670 line of cards have been good and solid.
    1 GB of on-card memory seems to be a good size, even for editing a lot of images, and GDDR5 memory provides faster access than DDR3.
    You should know that besides using Photoshop heavily, I also develop OpenGL-based software as well, so I have some additional insight into driver implementations.
    -Noel

  • 3ds Max crashes using Quadro 1000M card on battery

    If I run 3ds Max 2012 on the Quadro 1000M card with the power adaptor plugged in it runs fine. If I unplug the power while the program is running, or start the program under battery power the program will run for a few seconds then freeze.
    Running under the Intel graphics works fine, however the purpose of having a workstation class laptop is to take advantage of the inproved graphics option.
    The W520 is listed as 3ds Max "certified" by Autodesk. I have all the latest Lenovo and Windows drivers, as well as the latest BIOS installed as of 1/10/2012.
    Is anyone else having issues with applications crashing while using Quadro graphics on battery power?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    hey Senorpablo,
    welcome to the forums
    The driver version for your Quadro is at 8.17.12.7593 ? If not update it here >> http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/downloads/detail.page?DocID=DS013693
    And bios is at 1.34 ? The update is here >> http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/downloads/detail.page?DocID=DS018884
    Since this only happens for this particular program, try reinstalling 3ds Max and when you reinstall; set your unit to diagnostic mode via msconfig before doing so.
    at the same time check with the Autodesk forum, there might be other uses who has the Quadro 1000m on their system who is experiencing the same symptom or maybe a patch is available for this.
    WW Social Media
    Important Note: If you need help, post your question in the forum, and include your system type, model number and OS. Do not post your serial number.
    Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
    If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!
    Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!
    Have you checked out the Community Knowledgebase yet?!
    How to send a private message? --> Check out this article.

  • I am stumped I do not understand why my roommates macbook pro when duel screened will display perfectly on my monitor while mine refuses to, but mine will display perfectly when using another monitor that is not mine. Please help me out.

    One day when using my duel display the second monitor decided it wouldn't display at full resolution in the middle of doing something i was confused. I use a mini display to hdmi then hdmi to the second monitor. I thought maybe the converter or cable died. I bought another another mini display to hdmi and tried another hdmi cord and the same issue. My roommate has macbook pro as well so i decided to see if it was the monitor, when i pluged the mini display converter into his and used the external monitor it displayed perfectly not below resolution. Doing this I knew it was not the monitor or the mini display to hdmi or the hdmi cable. I took it into the genuis bar assuming now that it was my grapics card or logic board. When the genuis went to duel screen it on a cinema display it displayed perfectly. So went home tried to duel screen it again and still not displaying at full resolution. That is where I am stuck, in summary:
    My screen used to display perfect resolution on a second monitor and suddenly did not.
    Tested two mini display to hdmi and hdmi cords both were fine.
    Tested to see if monitor was issue but displayed perfectly when i used roommates laptop.
    Went to genius bar and displayed perfectly on second monitor so it can display perfect resolution on apples monitors but will not do so anymore on my monitor, even though roommates macbook pro will display perfect resolution on my monitor.
    I am beyond confused.

    Apparently you have tried everything except - take the monitor in question to the Apple Store along with your computer.  If it works there, the mystery continues.

  • Will A 27 Inch Samsung LED Monitor work on my Macbook pro?

    I have a Mid 2009 Macbook Pro and I am not sure what ports it has. I see 2 ports apart from the USB (2 ports), Power and LAN. I am planning to buy a 27 inch Samsung LED monitor for the laptop. Here are the Macbook specs:
    Processor - Intel Core 2 Duo 2.26 Ghz
    Memory - 8 GB
    Graphic - NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
    VRAM - 256 MB
    I have read that even if I buy a monitor with speakers, I won't be able to get sound from them. What are my options if I buy a monitor with or without speakers? Will I need to connect to speakers using USB? The monitor has an HDMI port... in that case what cable will I need to connect the monitor to my MBP?
    Thanx in advance for all your help.

    Well you are in luck (I think) because the 2009 models actually output sound via HDMI with minidisplay port.**
    you'll need to get this Mini DP
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/H1824ZM/A/Moshi_Mini_DisplayPort_to_HDMI_Adapt er?mco=MTY3ODQ5OTY
    and an hdmi cord, and then just plug and play!
    Message was edited by: TheSmokeMonster:
    ** to see if your model is compatible with outputting audio from minidisplay port.
    in the comments from MM in Orlando, it says:
    The best solution, instead of trying to figure out the date your mac was born and the cut-off, etc...
    1. Click on the Apple Icon in the top left corner of the screen.
    2. Click "About this Mac."
    3. Click "More Info."
    4. Click on "Audio (Built In)." *** If you see "HDMI Output or HDMI/DisplayPort Output
    - Then you are GOLDEN!!!! If not, you are like me and extremely frustrated
    if you're out of luck like me, you can also try to get a miniToslink to Toslink cord, that is if your new samsung led supports it. I run mine into a 5.1 reciever so it doesn't matter if my monitor has one or not.

  • Install problems USB Adapter Card support 1.4.41 to Mac OS 8.6

    I am attempting to install the Apple USB driver 1.4.1 on my PowerMac 7600/132 to be able to use a newer printer. This computer does not have internet access and is a stand alone financial computer running Quick Books Pro.
    Mac OS 8.6
    128 MB Ram
    132 MHZ
    I purchased a Keyspan USB PCI Card - UPCI-2
    This is a USB 1.1 device and supports "Mac OS 8.6 (or later)
    Internet connection required to install driver under Mac OS 8.6 - 9.0
    Current USB Extensions
    USB Device Extension 1.2 111K Apple yes Enabled Yes
    USB Support 1.2 98 K Apple yes Enabled Yes
    I have downloaded the USB 1.4.1 driver from the apple download center
    http://download.info.apple.com/AppleSupport_Area/Apple_Software_Updates/English-North_American/Macintosh/USBUpdates/
    And copied all file to a Zip disc
    Files included
    About USB Adapter Card Wed, Jan 12,2000 9K
    Install USB Adapter Card Thur Feb 24, 2000 29K
    Installer Fri Aug15,1997 193K
    USB Adapter Card Tome Thur Feb 24, 2000 320K
    When I start the install it initiates and then a dialog box opens
    "Please insert the disc:
    USB Adapter Card Support"
    Keyspan was unable to advise any solution.
    Any thoughts?
    Thanks for your suggestions
    Spencer

    I did this years ago when I had a PM6500 running 8.6 & added a USB PCI card, but know I didn't have the problem you are having.
    When I downloaded from the link you provided, I got this file USBCard_Support1.4.1.smi.bin. After using Stuffit Expander, I got this file +USB Card Support 1.4.1.smi+, which is the installer. I don't have a Mac running 8.6, so I can't try the install.
    Suggest you do this. Put the smi.bin file in a folder on your desktop & then uncompress using Stuffit. This will yeild the .sim file. Then double click the .sim file. Did you get the message "+Please insert the disc: USB Adapter Card Support+" when you double clicked the .sim file? Or some other file?
    When you downloaded the smi.bin file did you use a Mac or a PC & then put on a Zip disc? What computer did you use to uncompress to get the .sim file?
     Cheers, Tom

  • When or is it possible that Media Encoder and Encore will get GTX 680 CUDA support?

    ...and will it really make a difference?
    Ive got the Creative Cloud deal, so my software is up to date (CS6) as of 8/16/12, and after installing my new GTX 680 4GB card and enabling it in Premiere and After Effects, I see a nice performance gain over my older GTX 550 ti 1.5GB.
    When I drop a finished H.264 Blu-ray file into a sequence and export it from Premiere into AME, my graphics card shows about 40-60% regular usage throughout the encoding, no matter what format I am exporting to. But if I just drop the same original H.264 file into AME and set it to the exact same encode output preset, then the graphics card is not used at all.
    Also, when you run GPUSniffer in the Encore program folder, you can see that it will not accept this card for GPU utilization. Ive looked all around for the Encore list of cards database it is pulling from, and Ive concluded that it must be in a compiled DLL file, so unlike Premiere, you cant modify it to detect the GPU. AME does not have either the list of supported cards or the GPUSniffer program in its program folder, so both of these programs will need the GTX 680 added to its list of supported cards by Adobe directly with an update, like they did with After Effects CS6.
    I can only imagine that transcoding in either programs would benefit from CUDA accelleration, like a few other transcoding apps out there already use.
    If Adobe is listening, the #1 thing I (all of us?) want in CS6 is for all transcoding products (Premiere direct export & projects, After Effects, Media Encoder direct file import, Encore) to utilize GTX 670 680 and 690 cards for accelleration out of the box. I dont want to use some 3rd party transcoder to get GPU aided transcoding, I want my CS6 Master Collection to be able to do it. Not too much to ask right?

    Hi, I have written a 'proof-of-concept' (i.e. unsupported beta) NVidia H264-encoder plugin for Adobe Premeire Pro CS6. If you are interested in trying it, go the following forum-post:http://forums.adobe.com/message/5458381
    Couple of notes:
    (0) GPU requirement: NVidia "Kepler" GPU or later (desktop GTX650 or higher, laptop GT650M or higher.)  The plugin uses the new dedicated hardware-encoder (NVENC) introduced with the 2012 Kepler GPU.
    (1) the "ideal" best-case speedup (over Mainconcept H264) is roughly 4-5x on a consumer desktop PC (single-socket PC, Intel i5-3570K).  Naturally actual results vary on the source-video/render.
    (2) Interlaced video encoding is NOT supported.  (I couldn't get this to work; I think it's a GPU-driver issue.)  
    (3) Only uncompressed PCM-audio is supported (no AAC/AC-3 audio.) Also, multiplexing is limited to MPEG-2 TS.  If you want to generate *.MP4 files, you'll need to do your own offline postprocessing outside of Adobe.
    (4) In terms of picture-quality (artifacts, compression efficiency), NVidia hardware (GPU) encoding is still inferior to software-only solutions (such as Mainconcept or x264.)
    In short, don't expect the NVENC-plugin to replace software-encoding any time soon.  It's not a production-quality product.  And even if it were, software-encoding still has a place in a real workflow;  until consumer hardware-GPU encoding can match the video-quality of the Mainconcept encoder, you'll still be using Mainconcept to do your final production video renders.
    cuda is meant for general computing including encoding.
    if you performe h246 encoding using cuda on gtx680 it can be done 1 minutes for a video that takes 90 minutes on i7 cpu.
    At that speed, the output of the hardware-encoder would be so poor, the video may as well be disposable.  NVENC is NOT faster than Intel Quicksync; actually Quicksync can be substantially faster.  But NVENC (currently) holds the slight edge in compression-quality.
    Off on a tangent, CUDA in MPE acceleration offers both speed-advantage and quality-advantage, because the CUDA video-frame processing is highly parallelizable, and can exploit the GPU's numerous floating-point computational-arrays to speed-up processing and do more complex processing.  That's a double-win.  So what does this have to do with encoding?  Right now, hardware video-encoding (which comes after the video-rendering step) only offers improved speed.  My experience with NVENC has shown me it does not improved video-quality.  At best, it is comparable to good (and slower) software-encoding when allowed high video-bitrates.  At lower video-bitrates (such as Youtube streaming), software-encoding is still A LOT better.

Maybe you are looking for