Will Microsoft Exchange2000 Portlet work with Exchange 2003

Hi All,
Has anyone tried using Microsoft Exchange2000 Portlet with Exchange 2003 ? Or is there any Portlet available for Exchange 2003 ?
Thanks in Advance.
Dipak

I'm facing problem with Exchange 2003 portlet which is not working with all users. it's working good only with the one user. I mean it doesn't allow the other users to put there user name & Password .
Please help me with this portlet or is there other portlet for exchange 2003
Thanks
Waleed

Similar Messages

  • Will Microsoft Office 2001 work with the Lion upgrade?

    Will Microsoft Office 2001 work with the Lion upgrade?
    Will one have to reinstall after the Lion upgrade?

    Office 2001 will not work with Lion. That is a Power PC App which is no longer supprted in Lion. You should upgrade to Office 2011, Apple iWork, or Open Office.

  • Is there a mail client that works with exchange 2003?

    my company Exchange is 2003 and neither Outlook 2011 or Mail work. Is there a way to make either of these work without upgrading Exchange? Is there another email client that might work?
    Thanks

    OSX's Mail uses the Exchange Web Services (EWS) protocol, which is only available on Exchange 2007 and later.  Outlook 2011 relies on OSX for connectivity to Exchange, so that is why Outlook 2011 doesn't work either.  As stated, if you can get your IR department to enable IMAP, you can get email funtionality.  (No calendar or contacts.)
    There is Davmail.  I'm told that it's still a bit buggy, but AFAIK, it is the only thing that would do what you want.  As mentioned by Glenn, I also recommend that you suggest to the company to upgrade the version of Exchange, mostly due to Microsoft ending mainstream support for Exchange 2003 back in 2009 (with extended support only for SP2 for an indeterminate amound of time.)  As a bonus, Exchange 2010 supports Safari for OWA, which is a good indication that Microsoft is at least making attempts at better Mac support.

  • Will microsoft office 2011 work with lion

    Will Microsoft Office 2011 work on my Mac?  (OS X Lion)

    well considering it's worked on Lion for over a year, I'd say yes.
    Please post further Office questions on Microsoft's own forums for their Mac software:  http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mac

  • Will Microsoft Word ever work with OSX Lion?/Worth switching to iWork just for

    I have the Microsoft Office Suite that I got with my computer, I want to know if it will work with an eventual Lion update before I consider updating to OSX Lion. I would like nothing more than to be able to update, but don't know if I'm willing to justify paying the 60 for iWork and then the 30 for LIon. Any suggestions either way would be great! I have been looking at the iWork package, but don't know how I feel about making the switch over...

    Office 2008 and 2011 run under Lion, but Office 2004 and the Office 2008 installer don't.
    (59590)

  • Will Measure 2.x work with MSOffice 2003?

    I need to see if someone at NI knows Measure any more. I tried to search but couldn't find what of the latest OS's it will work with or if it will work with MS Office 2003.

    It will work on XP SP1. By default it will overwrite the Firefox 2 application, but will use your current Firefox settings such as bookmarks and passwords.
    If you have previously tried to use Firefox 3.* on this computer you will likely have problems, it will use data from the previous time you tried to use Firefox 3.*
    If you have previously installed Firefox 3.* see this link - [[Firefox 3 upgrade switches bookmarks and other settings to older version]]

  • Will Microsoft Word 2008 work with Mountain lion

    Does anyone know?

    ML has not been released yet so no one here--all end-users like you---can say for sure. However, Office 2008 was the first version of Office with Intel code so the odds are good it will.
    You may want to ask in the Micorsoft forum since Office is not an Apple product:
    Office for Mac forums
    You may ned to research in another forum. This is for iMAcs made before 2006 and will not be able to run ML.

  • Will push email feature work with ios 6.0.2

    Will the push feature work with exchange accounts on iphone 5s running ios 6.0.2

    Quoted from my initial post:
    "A bug has been reported that affects push mail in iOS 6, that causes the Mail.app to work inconsistently with some Exchange clients. You can expect a fix in the next iOS update."
    That's all I can say in a public forum, sorry.

  • Will Photoshop Elements 10 work with Microsoft 8.1 operating system?

    When selecting the option e-mail from the Elements Organizer to share a picture, the program stops with a note from Elements Organizer stating they could not finish creating the e-mail message. I never experienced this problem when it was operating in my older computer running on Windows XP.  Will Photoshop Elements 10 work with Windows 8.1?

    Depends on what e-mail client you're using. I believe that for W8 you need to install the Windows 7 version of Windows Live Mail.
    Cheers,
    Neale
    Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children
    If this post or another user's post resolves the original issue, please mark the posts as correct and/or helpful accordingly. This helps other users with similar trouble get answers to their questions quicker. Thanks.

  • Outlook 2013 not compatible with Exchange 2003

    Hello
    Some of my customers bought SBS 2003 R2 just before SBS 2008 was released so they have systems which are only 4+ years old. SBS 2003 came with Exchange 2003 pre-installed. Outlook 2013 does not support Exchange 2003. So they cannot upgrade their Outlook
    clients to 2013 version.
    Microsoft, is this correct?!

    If this post is hard to read, it's because of Dragonsoft!!  (sometimes it is like auto-correct on the phone - "I said WHAT!??")
    Overall I think this is the most interesting thread that I have ever read on Microsoft.com.
    As a computer for professional for over 30 years, I've always followed the context that software products are designed for a three to five-year term, to have more is a luxury.
    When I was first in the industry (1983), Microsoft had a tendency to change the software versions every year to two years. As we approached the era of Windows XP there was an expected lifetime use of three years. Every two years a new product would appear.
    So, when windows XP lasted well beyond the three-year term, it was pretty exciting to not have to spend money on new product, and we all enjoyed the decade of Windows XP.
    The new generation of IT professionals has somehow believe that software products should live more than five years, and it just blows my mind!
    The reason that I make this post, is because I've used SBS ever since Back Office Server 4.5, and the versions of small business server (now called Small Business Server) have always appeared on the market 1 to 3 years after the primary versions of
    Windows for which they are named.  So I always felt that there was a disadvantage to using small business server in that the products appearing inside of SBS had been on the market for a few years before being incorporated into the SBS package. It
    made me feel, at first, that Microsoft was waiting on the level of maturity within the product before creating the SBS package. Now that I look back on the whole process it made me think that the SBS team had some difficulty merging the products into a install
    package which could handle the intricacies of the licensing limitations on the SBS system.
    SBS 2003 was a great tool when it came out, but I found that it was riddled with security holes. To say the least some of my first SBS 2003 servers had their exchange system hacked by outside influences. (These were external facing servers who had websites
    and exchange server running with public domain names, even though there were firewalls!) After a few patches, DNS modifications, reverse DNS entries, and some changes in the exchange system, I was finally able to make the system secure and solid.
    My first real nightmare with SBS was when upgrading to SBS 2003 R2, which, yes, appeared around 2005. You cannot simply upgrade a machine from SBS to a new version.  You must purchase a new server, install the new SBS version, and migrate your
    entire installation to this new host. (While running SBS 2003 for several years and making backups on a tape, I realized that the new hardware on the market would not support a restore from my tape backup!)  The whole process is rather daunting as not
    all of the detailed steps to upgrade work as expected. I had to call, and pay, Microsoft to complete the process because exchange had trouble during the migration.
    So off we went with our new installation of SBS 2003 R2.  Then along came SBS 2008!  I went through the same steps again... new hardware, new software, and, yes, paid Microsoft, again, for support to migrate.
    When SBS 2011 appeared on the scene I was willing to upgrade again. Having gone through this, twice now, I  fully prepared the client to purchase a new system and to purchase the new software. But because I was faced with the whole entire
    nightmare of new hardware, migration, and having to call Microsoft to complete the process, I decided on a new approach. This time we were going to buy server which would run VMware.  (I was not going to get stuck in a hardware box that I could not replace
    if I ever needed to restore the operating system due to a massive failure.)  So off I went, purchasing a new box, installing VMware, and installing my favorite operating system, Microsoft SBS!
    Well, to say the least, it wasn't exactly as exciting as I had expected. Had some trouble getting VMware to settle into the new hardware, as there seemed to be some compatibility issues, but was able to work it out. Eventually, I was able to get started
    on the migration. Things went well up until the point that I got to the exchange migration, and ran into a similar problem as before! A call to Microsoft revealed that it was even a little daunting for the support personnel, but as I documented the things
    that they modified, and even performed a little cleanup, after they performed their cleanup!  I can happily say that I'm no longer worried about hardware issues, when it comes to restoring my SBS server in case of a failure!
    Overall I'm pleased with having used Microsoft SBS solutions over the past 10 years, but I would never expect, nor would I lead my customer to expect, that a product should last 10 years!
    Previous comments have indicated that server should last seven years because they can be depreciated that way, I believe that to be entirely false!  I live in Texas, and the state of Texas DIR program has adopted standards which state that
    you should replace your hardware every five years! State agencies have this as a requirement, and it is not optional!  Many state agencies have gone to leasing their equipment, which is a three-year term. (Where do you think off-lease equipment comes
    from, anyway?)
    One of my primary clients looked at me one day, and directly ask, "Okay, if we spend the $10,000 on the new server and software, how long should it last?"
    Obviously, I wanted to say, "Forever!" But, remembering something that my mother had said (always plan for the worst and you always come out on top!), I said back to them, "I believe we should plan for a three-year lifespan, and if we get
    any more than that, it will be a luxury." Needless to say, there have been some upgrades which lasted well more than three years, but there have been some which have been spot on.
    The SBS server is a huge savings over purchasing the individual products separately. But there have always been some drawbacks during the upgrade process which makes the entire feasibility of the installation top-heavy when it comes to support costs. 
    I have noticed is that the SBS servers require more labor to keep them running smooth, especially with backup procedures and backup software, as SBS always requires a third-party product to make a "real" (restorable) backup.
    A client's expectations should be that you are taking care of their business without them having to worry about what takes place in the tech room. They understand, and realize, that they can pay you a specific amount of money for your support without necessarily
    having to purchase new hardware. But a good, healthy relationship with your client means that they should always be willing to upgrade, whether it is a workstation or server.
    If you allow a client to be painted in a corner, then it's not their fault, it's your fault!  Because, they have no idea what the new technology can do, and don't realize what's on the market. It's your job to keep up with what's current and to deliver
    expectations which make them realize that each year has a dollar value attached to it, whether it is spent, or not.
    If you have a client is unwilling to spend money to upgrade their equipment, then there's something else wrong with their business, and you should probably consider that they may not be in business for very long. So don't make it your problem when
    they are unwilling to spend money.  You don't work for free.
    One last, quick example of the conversation that I had with a client who was unwilling to upgrade because things seem to be working so well.  I put it like this, "You pay me to make certain that your business operates in good times and in
    bad. Right now, everything is fine. If your building were to burn, and the only thing we had were the backups, I cannot go out and purchase new hardware and restore your system successfully.  The equipment that we have operating here is no longer
    available on the market.  If I were to find the equipment, it would be out-of-date, and most likely, used, and I cannot guarantee its compatibility or functionality. So, if I can't restore your system to an operational status, then what would you do?
    I don't believe there are any number of man-hours you can use to recover the information lost. You would probably have to go out of business! If your business becomes my business, then I would try to move to a position where my data is safe and my business
    can continue in the case of catastrophe. The only way I can do this, is to purchase new hardware, new software, and put you back in a position of compatibility with the market. One of the things I always try to do is keep your business operations at a point
    where if I die, someone else can come in and take my place. The whole idea here is to keep your business going."
    It didn't take them long to come back and surprise me, "Make a list of what you need. Don't give us a list of what we need to get by, tell us what we need to be productive for several years.  We don't want to patch this together
    and always have problems."
    And just as a note, your customer can write off $10,000+ per year for new equipment purchases.  I think the number may be higher now. I had one customer who purchased a $15,000 system in December and wrote off $10,000 in one year and the other $5000,
    a month later, in the next year!

  • Require Passcode Immediately with Exchange 2003 and iPhone 3.0?

    Before I upgraded to iPhone 3.0 I was syncing with Exchange 2003 SP2 and I had set my passcode to be required after 1 hour, which was changed from the default of 4 hours. On the Exchange server we have a policy in place to have a max of 12 hours before a passcode is required which works on my WM phones.
    After upgrading to 3.0, the phone now immediately requires a passcode every time I turn it on. I went into the settings to change it to be a little longer, but the only option is to have it Immediately and I have lost all of the other options. Is there a way to get back at least 1 hour or something that reflects the 12 hour setting on my Exchange server?

    I can confirm that you just need to turn OFF Mail, Contacts and Calendar sync within the Exchange account, set the timeout 4 hours (or whatever - it will automatically shrink down if your Exchaange administrator's policy is more restrictive), and then turn back ON Mail, Contacts and Calendar sync.
    Note you'll get a scary warning that says all your Contacts and Calendar data will be deleted from the phone - Outlook users can ignore if you're syncing with Outlook, since it will re-sync when done.

  • Does microsoft word 2010 work with spaces in osx 10.5.8?

    does microsoft word 2010 work with spaces in osx 10.5.8?

    In order to set up and install the new AirPort Extreme:
    Setup and Administration
    iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch with iOS 5 or later and AirPort Utility 1.3
    Mac with OS X Lion v10.7.5 or later and AirPort Utility 6.3
    would it work with my older osx 10.6.8?
    Yes, if you set up the new AirPort Extreme using the guidelines above. The 10.6.8 Mac will be able to connect to the AirPort Extreme, but it will not be able to make any configuration changes.
    Only the devices listed above can be used to set up and make any changes to the new AirPort.

  • Does microsoft office 2011 work with mountain lion?

    Was wondering if Microsoft Office 2011 works with Mountain Lion since the 1997 version does not.

    Okay, I will try that.  It looks like I have installed it twice already.  An obvious novice. I will do it again though.

  • Does Edge transport server for Exchange 2013 work with Exchange 2010?

    Hello everyone,
    I want to install Edge transport server for my Exchange servers,
    Could you tell me if Edge transport server 2013 works with Exchange 2010?
    Thank you in advance

    Hello
    tip:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj898583%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx
    2   If you want to create an EdgeSync
    Subscription between an Exchange 2010 Hub Transport server and an
    Exchange 2013 SP1 Edge Transport server, you need to install Exchange
    2010 SP3 Update Rollup 5 or later on the Exchange 2010 Hub Transport
    server.
    sorry my english

  • Does Microsoft office 2004 work with lion?

    Does Microsoft Office 2004 work with the new Lion OS?

    Ptit-Loup wrote:
    Angry at Microsoft, and now angry at Apple...
    Microsoft killed macros compatibility when upgrading from Excel 2004.
    Apple kills OS compatibility with Office 2004 when upgrading to Lion.
    I did not upgrade from Excel 2004, since I spent a lot of time and energy  to develop a large number of functions using Excel macros.
    I will not upgrade from Snow Leopard.
    What else ?
    I had the intention to change my 4-year-old 17" Macbook pro, not compatible with Lion, to a newer one. I had... There is no further reason to do that.
    Apple, now loosing old supporters and customers ? Or am I getting too old ?
    A 4 year old Macbook Pro should run Lion. Unless its a CoreDue and not a Core2Duo. Remember that PPC computers can not even run Snow Leopard. This was when Apple announced that support for PPC programs would be phased out. Office 2004 is almost 8 years old now. Twice as old as your computer you say needs to be replaced. I can't believe people rush in to install a new system without doing a little bit of research, and the dropping of Rosetta to run old PPC programs was well advertised if you read up on Lion, as was the introduction of Mission Control and Versions. I even read up about them, and I'm not a professional like some who come here. May pay to remember to research in future releases.
    Good Luck

Maybe you are looking for