Win XP slow boot problem solved

Hi guys,
Just want to share my discovery re: slow boot.
For Win XP Pro users with 1 HDD:
1.  Go to Device Manager
2.  Select IDE Controller
3.  Select Primary Channel (assuming HDD is connected to IDE1 which according to the MSI manual should be the case)
4.  Click on the Advance Setting Tab
5.  On Device 1, Select None for Device Type and click OK
6.  Wait for a while because it takes some time for the window to close
And that's it !!!  I did tried the bootvis optimization first but only about 5 seconds were taken off from the start up.  I also took out the jumper in my WD HDD and even replaced my IDE cable.  Before my discovery, it took 2 mins to boot my PC.  Now it only takes 30 sec (i.e., from Win XP logo to desktop).
Hope it works for you guys.  Good Luck !!!

Great tips for the ATA HD from Artic  .
But for SATA the device cannot be change.
Anyway thanks for the great tips Artic.
Casing Tt Xaser III Skull
M/B 865 PE Neo-2 PFS Platinum Edition Bios Ver.3.6
CPU:P4 2.4C (HT enable) and ThermalTake SubZero 4G
(DOT Rank=Commander,Turbo,2395 mHz - 2760 mHz)
Memory: Corsair XMS 3500 2x512 meg (dual-channel dimm 2 and 4)
VGA:ELSA Gladiac 925 Ti4600
HD:2 SATA Maxtor 80gig and 1 ATA Maxtor 80Gig
CD/RW Yamaha and Pioneer DVD
PSU:ThermalTake Silent PurePower 480W (W0010/Black)
+5 V/40 A, +3.3 V/30 A, +12 V/18 A, -5 V/0.3 A, -12 V/0.8 A, +5 VSB/2 A Peak Load 550 W
Window XP PRO SP1
NEC FP2141SB
Microsoft DesktopPro
Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Platinum + Klipsch Promedia 4.1

Similar Messages

  • Who Said What That Got The "Cold Boot Problems Solved" Thread Deleted?

    Hello, guys.
    I logged in this morning and saw that Falipay??? had posted last in the thread I started called [something like] "Cold Boot Issues Solved And Temps Now Correct". I didn't get a chance to read it, but now that I've logged back in to see what he and others may have       written since my last post, the thread is gone. Not edited...gone.
    What happened since I last posted that got it deleted? It's not that important, but I was curious. Hope it wasn't something I did (I'm not showing any warnings).
    Anyway, thanks.

    Hey, Bas.
    I see now that you reinstated my deleted thread. It should be apparent that my thread was not about me "telling people to buy Asus". Thanks for reconsidering your position.
    And thanks Maxed Out for coming to my defense in the following thread (the "foul" language thing had me confused until I realized you guys were originally discussing something that happened before I ever joined the forum):
    Re: Maxed Out's post dated 7-21-2004
    From https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?threadid=53961&sid=
    Quote
    bump due to yet more deleted threads.............
    Link to mention of deleted thread......
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?threadid=55411&sid=
    The thread that was deleted provided relevant user evidence of differences in MB's using the identical NF3-250 chipsets and baseline CPU, memory and power supply. With different results ....thus pointing to apparently correctable issues MSI needs to address.........there was absolutly no fol..(faoul foul fal?)...fowl language there, the users tests and opinions were presented unbiasedly and rationally (and had appropriate praise for MSI's strengths (spelling from BIOS)..........
    Why shouldn't forum users be advised of this?
    Later.

  • Win 7 slow boot - login in with fingerprint reader

    Hi
    I have a T400s (2.4 GHz and 4 GB) with an Intel SSD and WIn 7 RTM with latest Lenovo beta drivers.
    I have the fingerprint reader activated for login and my boot time of 35 seconds is now split about half in the fingerprint login and half in the rest of the boot process.
    Or described in another way if the machine is powered off and I swipe my finger to start the machine it takes about 17 seconds before the login prompt (the finger) is shown.
    Then the machine shows "waiting" for 15-20 second during which my personal login icon flashes by before it completes the login and almost immediately shows the desktop.
    I am surprised by the very slow login with my finger already swiped. It would be much faster to disable the fingerprint reader and log in using a password. Anyone encountered this problem and knows how to fix it?
    Other problems with the boot I have found (and solved) is the use of a solid color as the Windows background which for some reason costs about 15 second in boot time!!? I also had to reflash the firmware of my SSD to gain an additional 10 seconds at the start of the boot process.
    Mats
    Thinkpad T400s, X61s, X41, 600

    Hi Mats,
    I have a similar, if not, the same complaint. I have a T500 running Win 7, which was just upgraded from NT.
    My complaint - and it goes under the topic of usabiltiy - is that it takes anywhere from a couple of seconds up to 20 seconds before a valid fingerprint scan is accepted. If it's a scan doesn't match, there's immediate feedback of an error. I wouldn't mind the delay so much if the was some immediate feedback. If I click the "other credentials" button, I can see that the machine is "validating".  If I enter my password, boom, I'm immediately logged in.
    This is annoying.  Under NT, there was not such problem.  Your post is from 1 1/2 years ago. It's surprising that no one else is complaining about this. I guess most just say "forget it - I'm just using my password." But I know the process works and works nicely.  (I've run the ThinkVantage System Update as recently as Feb '11. So, the drivers are current.)
    Hey, anyone from Lenovo listening?!!
    Regards, Ed

  • Slow Boot problem with New K8N Neo4 Platinum HELP

    Hello,
    I just set up my new rig, the system specs are..
    amd64 3500+
    K8N Neo4 Platinum PCI-E (non SLI)
    2x80gb SATA (insockets 5 and 6) Silicon
    2x512 ram generic
    BFG 6800 Ultra OC
    antec 550 truepower
    The entire install went well.. It zipped through windows98... But when it tired to Boot windows98.. it went really really slow.. The animation bar at the bottom was chugging.. like lagging.. and took well over 10 minutes to fully load..
    I check RAM was not it.. re-connected.. was not it.. new SATA cables.. no idea any help would do.. getting impatient and tired =O must get it up tonight!

    Don't know if you or many people have seen this it's appeared over the last few days K8N Neo4 Platinum  -  NOTE: NVIDIA nForce 3/4 Series board DO NOT support Windows® 98/ME
    There are people running 98 but my own understanding was that 98 could only use a sata drive as a data drive & could not be installed on a sata drive. Where have you installed it ???
    see Win 98SE IDE problem.... Has anyone worked it out yet?
    luck

  • Slow Safari problem SOLVED

    Thanks to Klaus I was able to get my safari back up to warp 5. For the last several days it has been running quite slowly.
    A few days ago I tried the solution I saw posted by Mulder that had basically suggested the following
    1. Quit Safari if it's running.
    2. Use Disk Utility to Repair Permissions.
    3. Go to Home/Library/Caches/Safari and delete all the sub-folders within that one.
    4. Go to Home/Library/Safari and delete any of these files you have there:
    • Downloads.plist
    • History.plist
    • LastSession.plist
    That did zip, zilch, nada as far as speeding things up.
    So I tried the solution Klaus offered:
    Open System Preferences/Network. Double click on your connection type, or select it in the drop-down menu. Click on TCP/IP and in the box marked 'DNS Servers' enter the following two numbers:
    208.67.222.222
    208.67.220.220
    Click on Apply Now and close the window.
    And WHAMO! Warp Speed again.
    Thank you Klaus for your assistance!!

    boileree72 wrote:
    For my knowledge what does adding the two DNS numbers do? What do they relate to and why does it solve the problem of slow loading web pages? I never had this problem until the last month or so and progressively got worse.
    I just posted this in another thread, so I'll just copy and paste here:
    DNS is the "Domain Name System" that directs your web browser to the right address when you type in a domain name, like http://www.apple.com . The DNS system looks up that address, finds that it is located at a server with the address 17.149.160.49 and directs your browser there. Sometimes the DNS provided by ISPs is flaky, and sometimes there are communication problems somewhere between your web browser and the DNS server your ISP provides. Using alternate, known-good DNS servers can solve those problems.
    the DNS addresses that Klaus recommended are from a very reliable, free service provided by OpenDNS.
    In your case I'd guess that the DNS that your ISP provided started having problems recently and got progressively worse.
    Message was edited by: Rachel R

  • Slow getResource problem solved by ImageIO.scanForPlugins()

    Hi all,
    I have a big swing application starting with java web start. A lot of images are loaded during the frame construction using class.getResource(). This runs well with jdk1.4.2. However, in Java 5.0, each getResource takes 100ms to complete and it sometimes fails. I only get this behaviour with java web start (not as a standalone application).
    I noticed the getResource becomes quicker after I call ImageIO.scanForPlugins(). So I moved this line to the top of my constructor and now it executes in 6 sec instead of 85 (even quicker than in 1.4.2) !
    Now can someone explain why I get this slow getResource call, and why the scanForPlugin solves my problem ? I suspect this has something to do with loaded classes, but I don't now exactly.
    Finally, since this problem is only appearing in 5.0, isn't it a regression bug ?
    Thanks for the clarification,
    Maxime

    FiApO wrote:
    I got the same issue.  Don't know why.  Maybe trafic shaping?  I tested with my t-mobile phones and same videos are fine on phone but not on Fios(with 3 different computers at different times of day).   
    The video will start but it wont play all the way through. 
    Also try to change DNS and blocking IP's.  Still have the problem.
    Anyone got a answer for that?
    Thank you.
    Answer? Switch ISPs. This has been going on for months - it comes in waves. I'm having Comcast (gasp) installed here soon. I'm done with Verizon as a company. Ditching VZW as well.
    Also, you should know it's more than just YouTube. It's basically any streaming service that may compete with Verizon's Redbox Instant.

  • Satellite P70-A-120 - Win 8.1 booting problem

    Hello.
    I have a problem with the boot of my Satellite P70.
    The first time that I push the power button, it appears the screen with the Toshiba logo but Windows 8.1 doesnt start.
    If I power off the pc with the power button and push the power button another time, appears Windows without problems.
    Someone could help me?
    Thanks!

    Hi
    First of all try to set the BIOS to default settings.
    Power up the unit and press F2, now you should be able to access the BIOS.
    Within the BIOS press F9 to get default values and save the changes pressing F10
    After that check if the notebook would boot properly.
    In case the issue would still persist, disable the fast startup as described here:
    http://aps2.toshiba-tro.de/kb0/TSB2B03EY0002R01.htm
    Feedback would be appreciated

  • Slow Booting Problems

    When i reboot my pc it seems to stick at the 8xtreme menu and hangs there for about 4 - 5 mins and when i look at the d brakcet on the back of my pc , led1 is lite red i have refered to my manual which stats the following
    Boot Attempt
    - This will set low stack and boot via INT 19h
    I ve rebuilt the pc
    reset everything
    clear cmos
    set bios to defaults
    but i still get the prob
    ones pc has finnaly booted it seems to run fine
    could anyone help me resolve this problem

    Quote
    Why would he need to reinstall windows? its clearly a problem during the detection of devices.
    not true, if Windows is that corrupted or he has a boot sector virus then the stall could be realated with the BIOS attempting to turn control over to the OS.
    I would as said, try booting to a Windows 98 Floppy (set the floopy drive as the 1st boot device in the BIOS) and if that starts up all fine then it is deff your hard drive or IDE setup. If you said you haven't changed anything recently then it is probably safe to rule out a Master/Slave pin header issue.

  • Slow YouTube problem solved!

    Hey folks! This was bugging me for days and I really thought Verizon was throttling YouTube where it was practically unusable. I found a fix after searching around for a bit and it seems the problem is the way the YouTube app "talks" to the nameservers through the router. 
    I have a Samsung Smart TV with a YouTube app and I was getting the slowest speeds on it while watching YouTube, then I did some searching around and found some people solve the problem by using Google DNS. 
    I though I had set that in the Verizon Router but it seems devices connected to the Router are using IT as a name server and not Google. Somehow I think a firmware upgrade on the Router is the culprit but not for everything, just the YouTube app. Seems the YouTube app "steams" in segments rather than a progressive download and probably utilized the nameservers on the Router instead of the live internet. I guess it's a bug in the YouTube app software that creates the long waits.
    What you'll have to do is set Google DNS on the device or computer your are using. On my Smart TV I set the primary to:
    8.8.8.8
    if you can ad a secondary then the addres is:
    8.8.4.4
    And that did the trick. You need to set this on all devices that stream video. I tested it with various 1080p videos on YouTube and it works flawlessly! My faith in FIOS is restored More info on Google DNS here:
    https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/

    FiApO wrote:
    I got the same issue.  Don't know why.  Maybe trafic shaping?  I tested with my t-mobile phones and same videos are fine on phone but not on Fios(with 3 different computers at different times of day).   
    The video will start but it wont play all the way through. 
    Also try to change DNS and blocking IP's.  Still have the problem.
    Anyone got a answer for that?
    Thank you.
    Answer? Switch ISPs. This has been going on for months - it comes in waves. I'm having Comcast (gasp) installed here soon. I'm done with Verizon as a company. Ditching VZW as well.
    Also, you should know it's more than just YouTube. It's basically any streaming service that may compete with Verizon's Redbox Instant.

  • Slow loading problem solved

    THANKS for help with wrt150n router. looks like things are now working great after using your tips.

    FiApO wrote:
    I got the same issue.  Don't know why.  Maybe trafic shaping?  I tested with my t-mobile phones and same videos are fine on phone but not on Fios(with 3 different computers at different times of day).   
    The video will start but it wont play all the way through. 
    Also try to change DNS and blocking IP's.  Still have the problem.
    Anyone got a answer for that?
    Thank you.
    Answer? Switch ISPs. This has been going on for months - it comes in waves. I'm having Comcast (gasp) installed here soon. I'm done with Verizon as a company. Ditching VZW as well.
    Also, you should know it's more than just YouTube. It's basically any streaming service that may compete with Verizon's Redbox Instant.

  • Slow boot problem

    I have recently installed a Seagate SATA HDD in my computer and since then, I have had a longer than normal (previous) delay in completing the BIOS boot.  I changed the IDE Primary and Secondary from AUTO to USER thinking that might speed things up but all it did was change the message that was displayed during the initial boot time.  I am now getting a message that says "flash recovery" and then the computer waits about 30 seconds before identifying the drives.  From then on the boot is normal speed.
    Any idea what the message means?

    A Bit off topic:
    I've seen many posts about enabling/dissabling "PCI IDE Bus Master" but never found an explanation why should be selected one or other option. Can someone give some light about it ?

  • MSI MOBO and AMD XP2600+ Boot Problem Solved.

    Thanx to MikNT. My KT3U2R is working with the AMD Xp 2600+333 at 166fsb.  :D  
    The problem was that the Fast Command for DDR was set to Ultra. This needs to be set to Normal. After that all is well.
    Madd
    My Rig:
    Amd XP 2600+333
    512 DDR333
    Nvidia GeF4Ti 4200
    WinXPSp1
    Sound Blaster Live Platium 5.1
    Maxtor 7200 40Gig HDD.

    Madd,
    Since you have a KT3 Motherboard and you posted in the nVidia/AMD/SiS Motherboard Forum, I moved the thread to VIA Forum for you.
    Good Luck,
    Richard

  • MSI 865PE NEO2-V booting problems [Solved]

    Hi.  I've been building a new computer and am seeing some weird stuff.
    System Specs:
    -P4 3 GHz Socket 478
    -MSI 865PE NEO2-V -V22 http://www.saveateagle.com/865pe-ne...EO2-V&ovtac=CMP
    -128mb ATI Radeon 9800 pro
    -120 GB Western Digital
    -1GB dual channel DDR400 PC3200 Corsair
    -Ultra 500w X-Connect:
    http://www.absoluteinsight.net/2456
    -DRW 1108IM ¡V DVD+/-RW Drive
    http://www.btc.com.tw/english/2-2-dvd_rw.htm
    -Generic Floppy Drive (sentimental reasons )
    The system seems to be running (ie no post beeps) but I'm not getting any signal sent to the monitor. I've tried running it out of the case with only the video card connected to the mobo, cleared cmos via battery and jumper settings, and the same thing still happens.
    Anyway, I've been talking with other guys on another forum too, but we haven't gtten it to work.
    http://www.techsupportforum.com/showthread.php?t=53044
    I'm going to try clearing the cmos again because apparently the battery must be out for several minutes, whereas I roughly did one minute. If the mobo has no ram connected, there should be post beeps, right? If so, I better check the case speaker connection again.
    Thanks for the help.

    I tried removing my RAM and powering -suprisingly no beeps . So make sure its not a faulty RAM, try another one

  • New Lenovo W530 SLOW booting

    New W530 Type 2436-CTO with Win 7 Pro, 16gb RAM, 256gb SSD.  This is my second W530
    Problem when I boot is it boots very quickly to the Welcome screen and then instead of going to the Win 7 Home screen, the screen goes dark except for the cursor and stays dark with hard drive activiity for about 45 to 55 seconds before the home screen pops up.  After than the computer runs as normal and very fast.
    Some thing in the boot sequence must be the problem.  I did all the Windows updates, MS updates and Lenovo updates.  I am mainly a  user so any help needs to be specific with detail directions.  Hate to send it back when it all works perfectly except it takes near two minutes to boot.
    Last W530 boot like lightning - Please help me

    When I have had slow booting problems, I have found help via a web search for 'diagnose slow boot times Windows 7', or the like.
    At the stage where you are having the long delay, there should be Event Logs listing how long each step in the boot process is taking, and whether that is a change from the previous time the computer booted.
    Here is a guide I have found helpful:
    http://itexpertvoice.com/home/what%E2%80%99s-taking-so-long-how-to-fight-slow-startup-times-in-windo...
    ^^ It walks you through looking at the Event Logs for particular types of messages, especially related to new delays in startup.
    Hope you find your issue and get it fixed.
    -JV474

  • Windows 8/8.1 slow boot (sudden onset)

    Can anyone help with a slow boot problem on Windows 8/8.1, please?  This concerns an Asus Zenbook.  It's about 15 months old, and has always booted very quickly.  Now, all of a sudden, it takes 5 minutes to get beyond the Windows logo screen. 
    I have tried all the standard things (clean boot, turn off Asus Fast Boot, etc), up to and including Resetting Windows.  No good: on either Windows 8 or 8.1, it still takes 5 minutes.  I have looked at the Windows System Log, and the delay occurs
    right at the beginning of the Boot process.  E.g., on the most recent boot I see as the first 3 entries (note, I'm in Europe, so dates are dd/mm/yyyy, and times are in 24-hour clock):
    Information    10/03/2014 19:36:23    Kernel-General    12    None The operating system started at system time ‎2014‎-‎03‎-‎10T19:36:23.490074300Z.
    Information    10/03/2014 19:36:23    Kernel-Boot    30    None The firmware reported boot metrics.
    Information    10/03/2014 19:40:26    FilterManager    6    None File System Filter 'FileInfo' (6.3, ‎2013‎-‎08‎-‎22T11:38:45.000000000Z) has successfully loaded and registered with Filter Manager.
    and you can see the 4-minute gap between the 2nd and 3rd entries.  That's where the delay always comes, though sometimes the "reported boot metrics" doesn't show.
    A little later in the procedure I do always get the following warning:
    Warning    10/03/2014 19:40:31    Kernel-PnP    219    (212)  The driver \Driver\WudfRd failed to load for the device ACPI\ACPI0008\2&daba3ff&2.
    However because that comes later I can't see how it can be causing the problem, and I suspect it's an independent issue.
    The machine appears to run normally once booted.  It is protected against viruses by Windows Defender.  I have looked at many posts on this and other fora on slow boot, and tried everything suggested, but none of the solutions have worked. 
    I have also looked widely on the web for problems with the File System Filter but nothing relevant comes up.  The machine is under warranty, and could be sent back, but that would be a serious pain so if there is a solution I can implement I would much
    prefer to do so.  Thank you for looking at this.
    There are no stupid rats, only misguided students

    Hi Seglea,
    I have exact the same issue as you have! The only difference is the time period the splash screen / logo screen with the dots spinning in a circle hangs / delays / freezes: exactly 120 seconds. You can set your watch to that delay. During these 120 seconds
    nothing happens, no HDD LED activity, just nothing. Having passed the 120 s, the HDD LED begins to flicker and the logon screen is displayed 15 s later. 
    For the first look at it, I believe that it is a timeout problem. Usually Windows services retry to start after just these 120 seconds (e.g. Software Protection is configured this way, but in my case it does not start although configured as auto delayed).
    I believe that the clue is to find out which service causes this delay.
    My event logs are exactly the same as yours (without boot metrics), I do also have your WudRfd warning!
    When started, the machine operates in a fast and stable way, as if nothing harmful had ever happened.
    I do also have an SSD installed as only (system) disk.
    In my case the startup screen of the BIOS also stays visible for more than 10 seconds, longer as on any other computer I have had before. I also had problems during installation of Windows 8.1. After the first reboot during OS installation the BIOS POST
    screen restarted in an endless loop. I could solve that problem by setting the dedicated internal Graphics memory to less than 1024M, although I own 32 GBytes of RAM.
    Nothing helped so far, I permuted my BIOS settings, even Fast Boot or Ultra Fast Boot did not help.
    I have installed the latest drivers, I even tried to update the firmware of my SSD, but Intels toolbox told me, that my 3 years old 520 series SSD (never had seen any firmware updates before) was up-to date! Thus Windows 8.1 should handle with it. I also
    did a quick analyzation with the tools, but everything was ok.
    I just run chkdsk /r /f, as Zigzag proposed, but I had nearly the same problems as you have had:
    Chkdsk got stuck at 10 % for 10 minutes then the machine rebooted with the 2 minutes delay and event logs do not show any Checkdisk entry.
    In the Applications log, I noticed a igfxCUIService1.0.0.0 sourced entry as the first entry after reboot approximately 2 minutes after the end of the delay: The description of the event-ID "0" from the source "igfxCUIService1.0.0.0" could not be found. Event:
    started/resumed which sounds ok. But it says that the component that caused this event, is not installed. (my translation from the German log)
    The device manager shows that everything is fine and working well.
    Here's my System constellation:
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H, Intel Ivy Processor i7-3770 with 32 GBytes RAM, Intel 520 Series SSD via SATA 6G, BD Writer from LG via SATA 3G
    BIOS F20e with UEFI and Secure Boot enabled (Windows 8.1 did install the GPT partitions):
    Fast Boot enabled/disabled doesn't bother,  Intel Virtualization  Technoloy Enabled, VT-d enabled, OS Type Windows 8, Network Stack disabled, Secure Boot Mode standard,  AHCI, USB 3.0 xHCI, Internal Graphics Size now 32M, (didn't bother up
    to 512M, 1024M BIOS POST-screen endless loop), Intel Rapid Start Technology Enabled (disabled same effect) => I installed Windows 8.1 with "Intel SATA Preinstall driver For AHCI  RAID Mode" in the F6 mode, as Intel recommended, Marvell ATA Controller
    for eSATA (disabling same effect), ErP same effects on dis/enabled.
     Windows 8.1 Pro German. Same effect when with or without LAN connected
    I am thinking of Reinstalling Windows 8 with CSM mode without UEFI, but I believe that would not have any effect. Maybe I'll try another system disk for a reinstallation (HDD or other older SSD).
    It would be nice if this problem could be solved by the community or by Microsoft, since I am not the only one!
    Peter

Maybe you are looking for

  • Printer problem with AW 6.2.9

    I have a recurring printer problem with both hp deskjet 5150 and Epson R220. After much work with techs at both, we have determined that it is an AW problem (v. 6.2.9) Other files print okay. I've searched through recent posts and found similiar ques

  • Keynote 6.0 copy-paste is not working

    I am not able to copy or paste anything (text nor images) within and from Keynote 6.0.1. Anybody else has this problem?

  • CTAS statement?

    Hello - I am running 10.2.0.3. I did a create table as select statement to create a new table with qualifed data. I found out that the default value of a column was not created in the table. I thought the create table as select statement would create

  • Times to GMT

    Suppose I have times, in the past (many before 1970), in many different time zones. No matter what the time, zone, or dst situation, I need to convert these to the correct UTC. Not for the purpose of printing, but for internal, programmatic calculati

  • Refreshing DefaultListModel on JDialog without frame problem

    I've inherited a v5 project and I know it's far from ideal code. I have a popup JDialog descendant. It's called from a JApplet. The dialog object is a public member of the Japplet extension. The Japplet reference is passed to the popup JDialog constr