WIP valuation with o value

Dear Gurus,
When I am calculating WIP,data has come but without any value (Rs.0) and no error messages come but one information message was come that RA version data was not changed.
And also when I am going in details than Information messages was come that was KJ240
please reply me if you have any solution for it
thanks & regards
Shiv

Hi Shiv,
I think the message number you have provided is not correct. Please check the message number again and let us know so that we can help.
Regards,
Abhisek

Similar Messages

Issue with Negative Value for Total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY.

Hi Experts,
we loaded the Cube with datasources 2LIS_03_BX, 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_UM.
We mapped the quanity field from 2LIS_03_BF in transformation either into Key figures "Quantity issued from valuated stock" (0ISSVALSTCK) or "Quantity received into valuated stock" (0RECVALSTCK ) of the cube.
For obtaining the Total Valuated stock, we used the Key figure 0VALSTCKQTY. This key figure is having the Inflow and Out flow values as 0RECVALSTCK and 0ISSVALSTCK. When i tried to check the content of 0VALSTCKQTY, the key figure 0VALSTCKQTY is not present in the infoCube content. I understood that the value for this key figure would be calculated at the time of query execution with the formula
{ Last obtained Valuated stock + (Received Valuated Stock u2013 Issued Valuated Stock ) }.
The issue is the first records in the query is obtained with negative value for the total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY even though the values of Received Valuated Stock and Issued Valuated Stock are with Zero. Could any one please help me on how the first record in the query is with a negative value eventhough the inflow and out flow fields of it are with Zero.
Many Thanks in advance.
Jeswanth

Hi Srini,
I observed an interresting reason for the stock being with negative in the first record.
Issue : While executing the BEx report, we have the first record with a negative value.
Let me explain with an example
Material : XYZ
Plant      : A
Date of Stock Initialization for data source 2LIS_03_BX -
> 12th April 2009.
So on 12 Th April 2009 consider that we have a stock in store with a value of 2640.
Then we have loaded wih Data source 2LIS_03_BF for all Historic Movement types.
At the time of query execution we will have the first record with a negative of available stock present on the day of initialization .
So, as we have initilized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th April 2009, we have at that time a stock of 2640 in availability.
Exactly with the same value of 2640, we are having a negative value i.e. -2640.
and also one more point to be noted is ...as we have initialized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th APril 2009...it has created a
opening balance of 2640 on the day of initiailization i.e on 12 th April 2009 in infocube....(which is an extra record...)...so if the previous record of 12,04,2009 is having some value in it..then it will get added to 2640 EA..which will give incorrect stock
So in the query the records will appear in the below following manner
Calendar Day     Total stock                                                                Received stock                                          Issued Stock
28.12.2005 ---> - 2640 EA
29.12.2005 --->    2000 EA                                                                       640 EA                                                        0
10.04.2009 --->      0                                                                                0                                                               2000 EA
11.04.2009 -
>    0                                                                                0                                                                0
                             (For making
                              the earlier record of initilization to 0 a negative value -2640 EA is created in the first record )
12.04.2009 (Initializtion day) ---> 2640 EA                                                 0                                                                0
13.04.2009
the day before initialization the total stock will be 0 due to the negative effect introduced by the first record and from the day of initialization the records will be the accurate values... On 12 th april 2009 we can see that a stock of 2640 is brought into the total stock. In fact if there is no negative value i.e. -2640 in the first record then ...the value on 11.04.2009 will be 2640 Ea and this will get summed up with the Opening balance of 2640 EA created by 2LIS_03_BX on the day of intitialization. So on 12 .04. 2009 the total stock will be shown as 5280 EA...so in order to prevent the double value only we observed that the first record is created with the negative of available stock present on the initialization ...to make the record before the day of initialization i.e. 11.04.2009...to be 0...so that from 12 th April 2009 ..will start to see the actual total stock in the query result...
This is happening only if we use both the data sources 2LIS_03_BX and 2LIS_03_BF for loading into BW.....
If we load alone by 2LIS_03_BF ...then as 2LIS_03_BX is ruled out in the loading...then no negative of available stock will be created ...because there will be bno opening balance created on the day of initialization.....and the opeing balance available will be flowing into consecutive records due to the movement types and 12 th April 2009 will be shown with avaialable total stock of 2640 EA.
Kindly let us know your opinions on this...
Thanks.
regards,
Jeswanth

BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE error: valuated with object dependencies

Hi expert,
having programmed an extension for a customer for automatic maintenance of characteristic values of technical object, we have come across an error.
When using BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE to change a characteristic followed by BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT (without wait) we have two scenarios:
1. if the technical object has no value in the characteristic before calling BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE the characteristic will be set.
2. if there is already a value set there is an error stating
Characteristic 'XYZ' valuated with object dependencies (old value '00')
However, I can't find a dependency definition in CT04. do you know what's wrong here,or what is a usual cause of that?
thanks
Stefan

Hi,
Please see the given link, It may help you.
Re: BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE and BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT
Regards,
Shamma

Spilt valuation with batch management?

Gurus,
I want to activate split valuation with batch management..
i know the configuration of doing split valuation..
but, i need help on batch management configuration...

hi,
Why do you want both at the same time??
Either split val. or batch management independently can solve your issues...
Please let me know the reason...
For split valuation :
To select split valuation ('OMWC'), proceed as follows:
1. Determine the valuation categories and valuation types that are allowed for all valuation areas:
global valuation categories via menu "Goto --> Global Categories"
global valuation types via menu "Goto --> Global Types"
2. Allocate the valuation types to the valuation categories.
a) Select "Goto --> Global Categories".
b) Position the cursor on a valuation category and select
"Goto --> Global Categories --> Assignments --> 'Types->Category'".
c) Activate the valuation types you want.
3. Determine the local valuation categories for each valuation area.
a) Select "Goto --> Local definitions".
b) Position the cursor on a valuation area and select
"Goto --> Local Definitions --> Allocate Categoires->Org.units (button Cats->(OU)".
You obtain a list of the global valuation categories.
c) Activate the categories to be used in this valuation area.
The system creates the local valuation types based on the allocations under point 2.
Only now can you create a master record with split valuation.
Specifying Split Valuation by creating Material Subject to Split Valuation
1. Create a material master record, selecting the Accounting View 1.
2. Enter your data as required on the Accounting data screen, specifying a valuation category.
(If you can't find the valuation category field, it might be hidden, use OMSR to define the Field Groups.
Look for the field MBEW-BWTTY for Valuation category).
3. Be sure that the price control indicator is V for moving average price and enter a moving average price.
4. In the case of split valuation, you can create only one valuation header record with price control V because the
individual stock values are cumulated, and this total value is written to the valuation header record. This is where the
individual stocks of a material are managed cumulatively. To do this, fill in the Valuation category field on the accounting
screen when you create the material master record and leave the Valuation type field blank.
5. Save your data and the system creates the valuation header record.
6. The initial screen appears.
7. Extend the material by creating new material master records from the Accounting view 1. For the first material, specify a
valuation type in the Organizational Levels dialog box and enter the respective accounting data on the data screen.
Proceed likewise for the other materials, distinguishing between them by valuation type. To do this, call up the material in
creation mode again. Due to the fact that a valuation header record exists, the system requires you to enter a valuation
type for the valuation category.
8. Repeat step seven for every valuation type planned.
You want to valuate the stock of material XYZ that you obtain from manufacturer A in Los Angeles at a different price than the stock you obtain from manufacturer B in Detroit. In this case, the valuation category is H for origin. Your valuation types can be LOS ANGELES and DETROIT.
If a material is subject to split valuation, every quantity (sub-stock) of this material must be assigned to a valuation type (for example, country of origin).
For every valuation type, there are two types of data in the system, as follows:
Valuation data (for example, valuation price, total stock quantity, total stock value), which is defined for every valuation type at valuation-area level and applies to all dependent storage locations.
Stock data, which, like batch data, is managed separately for each storage location. If a material that is subject to split valuation is also subject to management in batches, its stock data is not managed by valuation type, but rather by batch. Every batch is assigned to a valuation type.
The stock quantity, stock value, and valuation price for all valuation types are managed cumulatively at valuation-area level
Regards
Priyanka.P

Sales OH and Corporate OH computation in order WIP Valuation

Hi All,
While reviewing production order bookings it is observed that at the time of
running monthly "overhead run", system is calculating corporate overhead
and sales overhead and debiting production order. Since at standard cost
run, corporate OH and Sales OH is not being considered in inventory
valuation, hence production order is credited with cost of goods
manufactured level.
Now if the order is in open status, WIP valuation is happening like "Debit
in production order (incl corporate OH and Sales OH) minus Credit in the
production order (w/o corporate & sales OH).
Can you please suggest some way to follow for correct WIP valuation.
Regards,
Kumar

Hi Ajay,
Can you please let me know how can I assign these cost elements to line Id, when i create line id there is no option of assigning the cost elements. Can you please explain me how to do it.
Thanks for your support.
Regards,
Pavan Kajijpeta

With what value finish product as come when we do goods recipt from prd

Hi,
With what value finish product as come when we do goods recipt for oa prodution order in make to order scenerio.
The material is not talking standard price form th e material master when we are doing goods recipt.
Regards,
somiraghu

If you use non-valuated sales order stock (account assignment E) there will ne no value posting at all during GR, thus also no accounting document. The full actual costs (that Pankaj listed) will be posted during settlement of the production order.
Regards,
Kay

Conditions with 0 value in pricing appears in Price of sls order in ECC 6.0

Hi All,
We have upgraded from R/3 4.7 to ECC 6.0.We have a pricing procedure with Condition type VPRS for which the value comes from the valuation segment of the Material master.
It is a statistical condition.
In R/3 4.7, if we used a non valuated material, this condition did not appear in the pricing of the sales order as it's value is 0.
But in ECC 6.0 this condition is appearing in the sales order pricing with 0 value and is showing the red trafic light next to the condition.
Can anybody please tell if this is standard in ECC 6.0 Or do we need to make some corrections?
Regards,
Avinash Gyale

Hello Avinash ,
Condition type VPRS - Cost condition can be determined from KOMP-WAVWR-cost in document currency
( Subtotal B ) which depends on plant and company code not valuation type .There are other options also avalibale to set condition subtotal.
Routines can also be used to calculate cost.e.g routine 4 - to determine cost based on item category configuration , routine 3 - for Foreign currency , routine 7 for domestic etc.
Please check and these routines and settings in pricing procedure.
Regards,

Is it possible to create purchase order with zero value ?

Is it possible to create purchase order with zero value ?

Hi,
There are two scenarios where the purchase order is created with zero value.
1. Standard Purchase order with Free tick indicator.
Whenever we expect a material with free of cost from vendor, we use to put the free indicator in item overview. This means the material is valuated at zero price irrespective of price control in material master. Quanitiy is updated while receipts.
Conditions tab in item detail doesnt appear.
2. Consignment PO.
While creating a purchase order for consignment, the system doesnt ask us the price and the condition tab doesnt appear in item detail.
An info record for consignment must be maintained before making the GR.
Hope i have clarified. If you want any further clarification. please do reply.

Return with zero value

Dear All
Plz see below comments of Sujay.. can any one tell me is there any other sollution for that? plz note, while i am trying to use 501 MVT with ZSPR there is no FI doccument generated but if i use ROH material, then fi doc generated with value.. why and how it is happening?
plz advice
Subject: Re: maintaining spares returned
Message: As per your mentioned specification what i see is material type ZSPR is a valuated material, so in that case if you doing reverse movement 202 wrt 201 then it should cancel the effect of 10.00 RS, which the system is doing correctly.
Now coming to your question if you want to return the material to your respective store without any valuation, then why don't you do 501 movement.
BR

thanks for clarification.
however it will not change the answer in general.
return from user departments are usually done with 202 movement, 501 is usually used for receipts from external vendors without having a PO.
In any case the movements will be valuated with the price in the material master, if the material type is quantity and value managed.
There is only one option to return at zero value: make the field fo external valuation in the movement optional, and try then to enter a zero manually while executing the movement. This will post the movement with no value and reduce the MAP of the material accordingly.
But this is pretty dangerous as you will not really have a control about the use of this field, any user can enter any value and will effect the material prices.

Break up of WIP valuation is not getting.

Dera sap experts,
i have one problem , i am not able to see the break up of WIP valuation.Under the WIP much OVH, mat and labour cost booked un the production order.
my company scenario is product cost by order and when i put the t-code kkax, only able to see total figure of WIP not breakup wise and getting message " WIP explanation only available for valuation at target cost".
But product by order is only at actual cost.
pls let me what is the solution to get the WIP report break up wise.
for exp. WIP = rs10000
which mat    = rs2000
         OVH   = rs5000
         Lab     =Rs3000
Total             =rs10000
awaiting for your reply
Bikash Singha

hi,
the WIP explanation is not available for the APO scenario. You can only view the summarized WIP values via KKAS or KKBC_PKO
regs,
ramesh b

How to Run a Cost Estimate with Budgeted Values parallel to the Std Cost Estiamte

Hi Experts,
My client want to run a parallel cost estimate with Budgeted values for each type of cost in a similar process like standard cost estimate(currently only Std business run only the std. cost estimate). Below will be provided to run the said cost estimate.
     1. Budgeted Cost for cost elements against each cost center
     2. Re-posting/distribution will be required run to allocate and apportion the cost from service cost centers to Production cost centers
     3. All Planned(future) Material Cost will be provided. (note that the valuation strategy of costing variant of standard cost estimate has below sequence
     4. Budgeted activity quantities will be provided. (Cost and activity qty for Kp06 and Kp26)
Based on the above data business need to run a cost estimate with budgeted values parallel to the standard cost estimate(based on planned values), which will be compared with actual then Budget at each months.
Simply an alternative cost estimate with budgeted values for a given period for all materials.
Kindly advice the possibility of such a cost estimate in the system and if possible pls. mentioned the Process in order and configuration steps for the same.
Thanks in advance.
Aziz

Hi..
You can define costing variants which have valuation variant for budgeted values parallel to the standard cost estimate in Customizing for Product Cost Controlling.
You can define target cost versions using above costing variants under the customizing transaction OKV6 as below picture.
When you calculate variances, you can check “all target cost version” flag to calculate variances for all target cost versions in the controlling area as below picture.
You can analysis the difference between actual cost and several budget cost using target cost version as below picture.

Project Stock - goods receipt with ZERO value

Hi all,
when WBS element is assigned in production order, for a specific material Goods receipt is posting with ZERO value.
When there is no WBS element assignment , it is posting normally. I have checked QBEW and QBEWH tables, there also stock is updated , but value is ZERO.
what could be the reason?
regs,
Ramesh B

You have to set in via customizing: Project System -> Structures -> Operative Structures -> Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) -> Create Project Profile
In Project Profile / tabstrip "Control" / section "Project StocK"/ set valuated stock

PO with out Value

Hi Experts,
Can we make a PO with out value for a material?
Scenario:
Client wants to make a PO without Value for a matrial, next wants to process or some value addition and wants sell this as a finished goods.
Can I create this material under the material type non valuated material and make a PO?
Experts pls suggest ways to achieve this in SAP
Thanks
Naveen

Hi Anamika,
If we create a material of material type "UNBW" then automatically by SAP standard it will not have a accounting view nor it will have a value updation at plant level, so it's not required to ensure the point.
we can check it with t.code OMS2
The material can simply be created with material tye "UNBW"
Regards,
Sushanta

JDBC MS Access--- cannot extract entry with null value with data type Meta

I'm trying to extract a data entry with null value by using JDBC. The database is MS Access.
The question is how to extract null entry with data type memo? The following code works when the label has data type Text, but it throws sqlException when the data type is memo.
Any advice will be appreciated! thanks!
Following are the table description and JDBC code:
test table has the following attributes:
Field name Data Type
name Text
label Memo
table contents:
name label
me null
you gates
Code:
String query = "SELECT name, label FROM test where name like 'me' ";
ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery(query);
while (rs.next())
String name = rs.getString("name");
rs.getString("val");
String label = rs.getString("label");
System.out.println("\t"+name+"\t"+label);
catch (SQLException ex)
System.out.println(ex.getSQLState());
System.out.println(ex.getErrorCode());
System.out.println("in sqlexception");
output:
C:\Temp\SEFormExtractor>java DBTest
yet SELECT name, label FROM test
null
0
in sqlexception

The question is how to extract null entry with data type memo?Okay, what you need to do is this:
if (rs.getString("val") == null)
// do something
}This way, when it's a null value, you can check it first, and then handle it how you want, rather than getting an exception.

Need help with NULL values in Crosstables

Hello everybody,
I need some help with NULL values and crosstables. My issue is the following:
I have a query (BW - MDX-Query) that gives me turnover measures for each month. In Crystal Reports I choose crosstable to display this whereby I put all month in columns and all turnover-measures in rows. Each month that has a value (measures are not empty) is chown in the crosstables rows. So far so good. The problem occures when there are month that actually have no values (measures are empty). In that case these months are not chown in columns. But I need CR to display these columns and show the value 0. How can I do that?

Hi Frank,
Cross tab shows the data based on your column and these column fields are grouped and based on the group it will show your summaries.
If there is no data for any of your group it will not display that group. In this case you will have to create a standard report which should look like cross tab and to get zero values you need to write formulas .
Example if you want to display Moth wise sales :
if Month() = 01 Then
sum() else 0
Now this formula will check if your month is Jan, then it will sum up the values else it will display zero value.
This is possible only through standard report not with Cross Tab.
Thanks,
Sastry

WIP valuation with o value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for