Wism2 in High Availability - FUS Upgrade

Hello all,
what is the procedure to be followed when upgrading the FUS on a WISM-2 in HA cluster?
Is it the same procedure that applies when upgrading the wism's code in HA?
Thank you
Edited:
The procedure is exactly the same as upgrading. First upgrade the image and then FUS.make sure that you are connected using console connection and definitely perform this within a maintenance window of at least 1 hour.

Hi,
Thanks for sharing this info.
Snipped from this guide also explains how its done:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12190806/wism2-high-availability-fus-upgrade
The FUS image can be upgraded while the controllers have HA enabled. The secondary controller will
get upgraded just like it does when upgrading the regular code. However, when you initiate the reboot
on the primary controller both controllers will be unreachable until the FUS upgrade completes on both
the active and the standby in the HA pair. This process will take around 30 to 40 minutes to complete
just like in a non-HA FUS upgrade.

Similar Messages

High Availability design/upgrade

Hi,
We’re looking to upgrade our Production SQL Cluster infrastructure. Currently we are running on old hardware and software….We currently have two nodes in the cluster. 2-Proliant
DL380 Gen5 servers connected to our HP MSA2000 for shared storage(Direct Attached Storage) using a SAS cable with 1 terabyte. Windows 2008 R2 enterprise with Clustering turned-on and SQL 2005 server. The DB isn't that
big, but it is crucial to our company…. I was curious to get some opinions what would be our best options to upgrade….. We have two spare physical Proliant DL380 Gen 8 servers w/ 64 gigs of ram and total of 1.5 terabyte of worth of disk space. We would
have all the HD bay’s with HD’s therefore no need for a new HP MSA /direct attached storage….. So should we go with Windows 2012 Enterprise with SQL Enterprise and turnon SQL Always on Availability Group? Or any other recommendations? Any suggestion
and comment would be greatly appreciated.

Hello,
SQL Server AlwaysOn Availability Groups requirement Windows Server Failover Clustering (WSFC) clusters.Each availability replica of a given availability group must reside on a different node of the same WSFC cluster
Based on your description, it seems that you had two node cluster with Windows Server 2008 R2. If so, you should install windows 2008 R2 SP1 for supporting SQL Server AlwaysOn Availability Groups.
Reference:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff878487.aspx
Regards,
Fanny Liu
Fanny Liu
TechNet Community Support

How to perform up high availability upgrade with database changes?

Hi,
Can someone point me to pertinent documentation for performing live upgrades? Specifically I'm looking for best practice for setting up and attaining High Availability especially during application upgrades which have db changes.
Thanks in advance,
Rich

Hi,
For internal clients, yes, your requirement can be met by setting the autodiscover site affinity by using the “AutoDiscoverSiteScope” parameter in Set-ClientAccessServer command:
https://technet.microsoft.com/zh-cn/library/bb125157(v=exchg.150).aspx
For external clients, I am afraid “No” because the “autodiscover.domain.com” only points to one CAS server.
Thanks,
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 Migration and Architect a resilient and high availability exchange setup

Hi,
I currently have a single Exchange 2010 Server that has all the roles supporting about 500 users. I plan to upgrade to 2013 and move to a four server HA Exchange setup (a CAS array with 2 Server as CAS servers and one DAG with 2 mailbox Servers). My
goal is to plan out the transition in steps with no downtime. Email is most critical with my company.
Exchange 2010 is running SP3 on a Windows Server 2010 and a Separate Server as archive. In the new setup, rather than having a separate server for archiving, I am just going to put that on a separate partition.
Here is what I have planned so far.
1. Build out four Servers. 2 CAS and 2 Mailbox Servers. Mailbox Servers have 4 partitions each. One for OS. Second for DB. Third for Logs and Fourth for Archives.
2. Prepare AD for exchange 2013.
3. Install Exchange roles. CAS on two servers and mailbox on 2 servers. Add a DAG. Someone had suggested to me to use an odd number so 3 or 5. Is that a requirement?
4. I am using a third party load balancer for CAS array instead of NLB so I will be setting up that.
5. Do post install to ready up the new CAS. While doing this, can i use the same parameters as assigned on exchange 2010 like can i use the webmail URL for outlook anywhere, OAB etc.
6. Once this is done. I plan to move a few mailboxes as test to the new mailbox servers or DAG.
7. Testing outlook setups on new servers. inbound and outbound email tests.
once this is done, I can migrate over and point all my MX records to the new servers.
Please let me know your thoughts and what am I missing. I like to solidify a flowchart of all steps that I need to do before I start the migration.
thank you for your help in advance

Hi,
okay, you can use 4 virtual servers. But there is no need to deploy dedicated server roles (CAS + MBX). It is better to deploy multi-role Exchange servers, also virtual! You could install 2 multi-role servers and if the company growths, install another multi-role,
and so on. It's much more simpler, better and less expensive.
CAS-Array is only an Active Directory object, nothing more. The load balancer controls the sessions on which CAS the user will terminate. You can read more at
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/03/05/load-balancing-in-exchange-2013.aspx Also there is no session affinity required.
First, build the complete Exchange 2013 architecture. High availability for your data is a DAG and for your CAS you use a load balancer.
On channel 9 there is many stuff from MEC:
http://channel9.msdn.com/search?term=exchange+2013
Migration:
http://geekswithblogs.net/marcde/archive/2013/08/02/migrating-from-microsoft-exchange-2010-to-exchange-2013.aspx
Additional informations:
http://exchangeserverpro.com/upgrading-to-exchange-server-2013/
Hope this helps :-)

How to enable high availability on SQL Server 2005 with Windows Server 2008 Enterprise R2

Dear Folks,
I would like to ask you about this thing. I'm working for IT department for bank in Myanmar. Our bank have up to 96 branches across all of Myanmar including H.O. We are using Microsoft SQL Server 2005 with Windows Server 2008 for our banking
information system. My main problem is having to backup and restore the database backup files every time the servers in branches goes down for whatever reasons. I want to deploy this feature of high availability and failover cluster using Windows Server 2008
and SQL Server 2005. Our branches have 2 Servers. One is for Primary and other is for Backup. What I want to do is that, I want to change Backup Server to Primary Server whenever the Primary Server goes down for whatever reasons. All the working data and databases
from Primary will immediately replicated into Backup Server along with all the IP information of Primary Server. Please give me step by step guide for this process.

Try below
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/cindygross/archive/2009/10/23/checklist-for-installing-sql-server-2005-as-a-clustered-instance.aspx
I will recommend you to upgrade SQL server to newer version for support as well as flexibility.
Regards,
Vishal Patel
Blog: http://vspatel.co.uk
Site: http://lehrity.com

Load balancing and High Availability topology

Our Forms 6i client-server application currently runs on Citrix farm of 20 Windows 2000 boxes (IBM Blade Servers 2 CPU and 2 Gig Memory).
Application supports 2000 users.
We are moving to AS 10g r2, forms 10g and the goal is to use same hardware, 20 Windows boxes (or less), for intranet web deployment.
What will be our best choices for application Load balancing and High Availability?
Hardware load balancer, Web Cache, mod-oc4j? Combinations?
Any suggestions, best practices, your experience?

Gerd, I understand, that you are running 10g web forms through the browser, but using Citrix for deployment. This means that in addition to Application Server and Forms runtime sessions, it will be separate browser session opened for each user. What the advantage of this configuration?
Michael, we are aware, that Citrix is not supported by Oracle as a deployment platform. That only means that prior contacting Oracle Support we have to reproduce the problem in standard environment. It was never been a problem to reproduce problem :) We were using Citrix as a deployment platform for Forms 6i client/server for 4 years, but now we are forced to upgrade to 10g.
We are familiar with various Load balancing options available. The question is which option is the most "workable" in our case.

After start of Grid High Availability Service (HAS) can't umount filesystem

I have weird problem when I start and stop HAS. File system get's into state, where it does not umount. So filesystem where grid software is running can't be umounted on boot. 9Is there something I do wrong, or don't do right.
I have fresh install of latest 64-bit UEK2 kernel (2.6.39-400.109.1.el6uek.x86) and Oracle 11.2.0.3 Grid Infrastructure for standalone server. I Installed patch p12983005 (112036_Linux-x86-64) to get ACFS support for kernel. When I start HAS and ASM, file system does not umount anymore. Here's steps. Example is from local disk, but I have same problem with LUN from SAN. I thought it might have something to do with SAN and multipath, but SAN is not to blame cos same happens with local disk. Don't know why local disk seem be mapped by multipath in fstab.
1. Mount fs
[root@SERVER ~]# mount -t ext4 /dev/mapper/vg_SERVER-lv_app /u01
2. Start HAS
[grid@SERVER ~]$ crsctl start has
CRS-4123: Oracle High Availability Services has been started.
3. Stop HAS
[grid@SERVER ~]$ crsctl stop has
CRS-2791: Starting shutdown of Oracle High Availability Services-managed resources on 'SERVER'
CRS-2673: Attempting to stop 'ora.cssd' on 'SERVER'
CRS-2673: Attempting to stop 'ora.LISTENER.lsnr' on 'SERVER'
CRS-2677: Stop of 'ora.cssd' on 'SERVER' succeeded
CRS-2677: Stop of 'ora.LISTENER.lsnr' on 'SERVER' succeeded
CRS-2673: Attempting to stop 'ora.evmd' on 'SERVER'
CRS-2677: Stop of 'ora.evmd' on 'SERVER' succeeded
CRS-2793: Shutdown of Oracle High Availability Services-managed resources on 'SERVER' has completed
CRS-4133: Oracle High Availability Services has been stopped.
4. Try umount
[root@SERVER ~]# umount /u01
umount: /u01: device is busy.
(In some cases useful info about processes that use
the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1))
[root@SERVER ~]# fuser /u01
[root@SERVER ~]# lsof |grep /u01
Neither of fuser or lsof returns nothing.
This and the fact that ACFS cannon't be mounted on boot, get's me wondering should I use ASM and Oracle Restart at all at this point. Initial reason is that in future this is likely going to be part of RAC.

I followed the instructions and copied the edid file I obtained while monitor was connected directly to the specified directory.
Now I get:
Jan 17 13:14:09 daniel-think kernel: platform VGA-1: Direct firmware load for edid/medion-edid.bin failed with error -2
Jan 17 13:14:09 daniel-think kernel: [drm:edid_load] *ERROR* Requesting EDID firmware "edid/medion-edid.bin" failed (err=-2)

High Availability Options Without Enterprise Edition

I think I've found the answer to this already but I just wanted to confirm that I'm getting this right. In SQL Server 2012, is there no way to implement a high-availability solution which doesn't require shared storage or use of a deprecated feature without
having Enterprise Edition?
At the moment we have databases hosted on a primary server running Windows Server 2012 Standard and SQL Server 2012 Standard. We have a second, identical server, and the databases are mirrored between the two servers using Database Mirroring.
This works perfectly and meets all of our requirements. The only possible problem is that we're looking at storing documents using FILESTREAM, which isn't available in Mirrored databases.
From what I've read, Database Mirroring is deprecated in SQL Server 2012. High Availability Groups, which sound great, are only available in the Enterprise Edition. This feels like a real kick in the teeth from Microsoft. We're stuck
with either using a deprecated feature (Mirroring), which is only postponing the problem until the end of 2012's life cycle, or laying out significant amounts of money (in the tens of thousands of pounds GBP) to upgrade to Enterprise Edition, which we just
don't have the budget for.
Why couldn't Microsoft continue to offer a high availability option for businesses without deep pockets? Do I have any options I'm not thinking of? Shared storage is not an option (too costly, single point of failure, geographically separated
datacentres).

Thanks for all the feedback.
I was forgetting that even data stored as FILESTREAM would need to be backed up using SQL backups, so I guess that's an issue either way, thank for reminding me, Sebastian.
Geoff, I agree that replication isn't a viable HA solution. FCI has lots going for it, but from what I can make out (and I am just reading up on this now so I could be wrong) requires either shared storage or a third-party tool to move the data from
the Primary server's local storage to the local storage of the Secondaries. It all seems overly complicated when Mirroring does exactly what I need it to do, merrily writing transactions to the mirrors at the same time as the primary databases.
Additionally, whilst you might be right about making the case for Enterprise Edition, it's difficult to make a clear case to non-technical people when we already have a working HA solution and document management. Trying to explain the nuanced advantages
of SQL Server full-text indexing (at present we use a third-party indexing product which stores the index discretely) and simplified querying when the documents are in the same database as their associated data as justification for spending tens of thousands
of pounds is a challenge!
David, that's useful to know, about the disadvantages of using FILESTREAM and how just storing the documents in a VARBINARY(MAX) column might actually give better performance, thank you.

WLC 5508 - High Availability

I am upgrading the Wireless Infrastructure with two 5508 WLC.
I am setting up High Availability, but I think is not quite working.
Primary Controller = WLC1
Secondary Controller = WLC2
LAP = LAP1
LAP1 has WLC2 as the primary controller for HA
LAP1 has WLC1 as the secondary controller for HA
While connected to LAP1, I shutdown WLC2. After ~ 20 seconds, LAP1 move to WLC1.
I lost connection from LAP1
Don't LAP1 should move with all its clients to WLC1?
Am I missing something in my configuration?
Thanks for all your help in advance

Hello,
Let me clarify high availability/failover here. As previously mentioned, you can set the heartbeat times to reduce WLC failure detection time. Once an AP determines it has lost the connection to it's controller, it will perform the discovery/join process to the configured Secondary WLC. During this process, the AP will need to verify configuration from the secondary WLC and the Radios will get reset.
So, you will not experience a perfectly seamless transition when an AP moves from WLC1 to WLC2. Detection time with defaults is 30 second heartbeat, so I would expect anywhere from 15-45 second outage on a WLC failure scenario. The network will then be operational again and clients should be able to connect.
Thanks,
-Patrick Croak
Wireless TAC

JSPM in high availability

Dear Friends,
I have installed PI 7.1 in High availability using Microsoft windows MNS based cluster. It was with initial patch level 04 of Netweaver 710.
I have installed SCS, ASCS, Enque Replication Services etc in cluster mode. I have installed primary application server on Node 2 and Additional Application server on Node 1.
Now I installed SP07 using JSPM from my Primary Application server i.e. Node 1. It went successfully and my support Pack level was upgraded to Sp07. But now when I open Java stack in Node 1, It shows only home page using url - http://10.6.4.178:50000
After that if I open any link e.g. UME or NWA, it does not open and throughs following error :
Service cannot be reached
What has happened?
URL http://10.6.4.178:50000/wsnavigator call was terminated because the corresponding service is not available.
Note
The termination occurred in system PIP with error code 404 and for the reason Not found.
The selected virtual host was 0 .
What can I do?
Please select a valid URL.
If it is a valid URL, check whether service /wsnavigator is active in transaction SICF.
If you do not yet have a user ID, contact your system administrator.
ErrorCode:ICF-NF-http-c:000-u:SAPSYS-l:E-i:sappicl1_PIP_00-v:0-s:404-r:Notfound
HTTP 404 - Not found
Your SAP Internet Communication Framework Team
Java is started properly on both the nodes without any error. While it is working fine on Node 2 i.e. 10.6.4.179.
Please suggest ! Do we need to do so special step for installing patch through JSM in High availability setup?
Jitendra Tayal

Hi Jitendra,
While doing a patch upgrade with JSPM in HA scenario, you need to switch off the automatic switchover option because, once the components are deployed, the J2ee gets restarted. If the automatic failover is active, the service gets switched over to the other node.
In this case, shutdown all the instances and stop the cluster.
Restart the systems. Start the cluster in the original servers.
Restart JSPM.
It should work fine then.
Let me know if it is helpful.
Best Regards
Raghu

The version 2008_1_620 of the Add-on ST-PI is too high for this upgrade

Hi Guru,
I' am doing prepare : upgrade from R/3 entrerprise 47X100 to ECC6.0 SR3.
PREPARE
02)                       Initialization     failed        yes
the checks.log report the following error :
SAPup> WARNING: The version 2008_1_620 of the Add-on ST-PI is too high for this
upgrade (> 2005_1_700).
                To avoid loss of data it is necessary to include the latest avai
lable version for the Add-on
                in the IS_SELECT phase.
                Please refer to Add-on note 69455 for further information.
I can't go on , How can I include the add-on in the upgrade ? the phase for include the add-on upgrade is 04) Extension   but i cannot skip phase 2    ? ! ? !
OSS note 69455 does not contain valid information.
thank's for the answer.
Regards Antonio.

Hi
I got the same error and it actually prevents from getting further, because its treated as an error.
"ERROR: To be able to use ASU Toolbox, your system requires at
       least Support Package Level 8 for the ST-PI software component
       For more information, see the upgrade documentation
WARNING: The version 2008_1_620 of the Add-on ST-PI is too high for this upgrade (> 2005_1_700).
         To avoid loss of data it is necessary to include the latest available version for the Add-on
         in the IS_SELECT phase.
         Please refer to Add-on note 69455 for further information."
2008_1_620 does not have a level 8, so it must be refering to the 2005 version of ST-PI.
Update SAPup.exe (in <upgrade dir>/bin) to newest version.
Regards
Kim
Edited by: Kim Hynek on Mar 30, 2010 11:36 AM
Edited by: Kim Hynek on Mar 30, 2010 11:40 AM

UCCX stand alone to high availability

I have a production UCCX signle server deployment on 7.0(1). I am going to upgrade this to high availability and just needed to check out the procedure to upgrade the existing production server to the first node in HA. My 2nd server is already built, with UCCX and SQL 2000 so it is ready to go. Upon reading the upgrade guide it seems like all I need to do is upgrade SQL and then apply the HA license (it is sort of vague I feel for something this crucial). So you do not need to re-run the install to define first node?
Any opinion (or link to a more detailed document) will be appreciated.

I know this is an old post but for the sake of the community the answer is yes. if it was set up as a
stand alone node to begin with it can be changed to first node using the cet.bat tool to change the startup behavior of the appadmin page as described here.
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/custcosw/ps1846/products_tech_note091
86a00805a7acc.shtml
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
1. On the CRS server, go to C:\Program Files\wfavvid\, and double-click the cet.bat file.
2. Click No when the warningappears.
3. Right-click the AppAdminSetupConfig object in the left pane, and select the option Create.
4. Click OK.
5 .In the new window, click the com.cisco.crs.cluster.config.AppAdminSetupConfig tab.
6. Choose Fresh Install from the drop-down list in order to change the value for Setup State.
7. Click OK
8. After you create the AppAdminSetupConfig object, log in with the user name Administrator and password ciscocisco, and then run the setup again.
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
this will allow you to change the node from stand alone to first node by re-running the initial UCCX setup wizard.
Don Mynes

ESP - MQ High Availability options

Hi there,
My organisation (DHS Australia) have recently upgraded our Websphere Message Broker environment from v7 to v8.
As part of this upgrade, in our Production environment we are now running 4 queue managers, the idea behind this is that it helps to provide a higher level of availability (i.e. basically if one queue manager goes down, the others can pick up it’s load).
The ESP MQ adapter currently only allows for connection to the one queue manager, so in our ESP-MQ implementation we are exploring possibilities of how we can possibly get the output from ESP shared across the 4 queue managers. We are looking at a number of options within MQ/Broker itself (eg. clustered queue definitions, clustered queue manager etc), and currently doing some testing to see how/if this works with the supplied ESP MQ adapters.
However, my question for the ESP community/tech-team is whether there has been any thought to implementing something similar to how SAP PI can connect to MQ in a High Availability sense? For example, see this blog post:
http://scn.sap.com/people/anandan.krishnamoorthy/blog/2010/06/08/high-availability-in-jms-adapter
Has there been any thought given to whether the ESP MQ adapter can be enhanced or configured to use a MQ Client Channel Definition Table, as an alternative connection configuration method?
Cheers,
Jason.

Jason - this isn't something that is currently on the ESP roadmap, but perhaps it should be. I'll be interested to see if others in the community have other perspectives on this, or experience doing something similar.

ASCP High Availability

How does one go about achieving high availability with Advanced Supply Chain Planning w/ R12 at the Apps Tier?
We are currently running RAC for our database tier, multiple application servers at the apps tier, and load balancing at the web tier.
However, when we upgrade to R12 and take advantage of installing ASCP on a 64 bit machine at the app tier, how can we make it highly available?
Thanks

Hi Nikhil,
information on High Availability you can find at [High Availability|High Availability]. Be aware that SAP does not deliver the actual High Availability software, but works together with partners on this. But a complete description on how to install on top of an HA system is in Technical Infrastructure Guide.
Regards,
Benny

WL9/bpel10.1.3.4 MLR10 high availability setup missing internal queues.

Hi,
Noticed that setups on weblogic HA (High Availability) cluster setups have a bug in setting up the JMS SOA module.
Currently 2 mandatory queues (distributed) and corresponding Factories are missing: eg BPELInvokerQueue and BPELWorkerQueue.
These queues basically guarantee no message loss during for example http/SOAP communications. Like in our case BPEL <-> OSB.
On non HA setups and probably older versions of BPEL the porting to WL9.2 goes smoother as they do contain these queues/.
Does anyone know putting them manually resolves the problem? Putting Service request on OTN to support this.
Thanks and Regards
Jirka

Hi,
okay, you can use 4 virtual servers. But there is no need to deploy dedicated server roles (CAS + MBX). It is better to deploy multi-role Exchange servers, also virtual! You could install 2 multi-role servers and if the company growths, install another multi-role,
and so on. It's much more simpler, better and less expensive.
CAS-Array is only an Active Directory object, nothing more. The load balancer controls the sessions on which CAS the user will terminate. You can read more at
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/03/05/load-balancing-in-exchange-2013.aspx Also there is no session affinity required.
First, build the complete Exchange 2013 architecture. High availability for your data is a DAG and for your CAS you use a load balancer.
On channel 9 there is many stuff from MEC:
http://channel9.msdn.com/search?term=exchange+2013
Migration:
http://geekswithblogs.net/marcde/archive/2013/08/02/migrating-from-microsoft-exchange-2010-to-exchange-2013.aspx
Additional informations:
http://exchangeserverpro.com/upgrading-to-exchange-server-2013/
Hope this helps :-)

Wism2 in High Availability - FUS Upgrade

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for