WITH clause equivalent in oracle 8i

Hi friends,
The "WITH" clause is very well supported in Oracle 9i. Is there any equivalent ways to use it in Oracle 8i?
Regards
J.B

Dear J. B.!
No, there isn't an equivalent for WITH in Oracle 8i. The only workaround for you is to build inline views in the FROM-Clause of your statements. Please have a look at the following link. It shows some example using a WITH-Clause and the equivalent SQL-Statements with an inline view.
[http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/misc/WithClause.php]
Yours sincerely
Florian W.

Similar Messages

MySQL LIMIT clause equivalent in ORACLE statement

Is there an Oracle SQL statement that would be equivalent to the MySQL LIMIT clause used to return only part of a result set?

The preferred solution is to make use of the analytic function ROW_NUMBER. There is a description in the Oracle documentation. The final example shown returns only the fifty-first through one-hundredth row of the EMPLOYEES table:
SELECT last_name FROM
   (SELECT last_name, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY last_name) R FROM employees)
   WHERE R BETWEEN 51 and 100;An alternative is to use:
    select *
      from ( select a.*, rownum rnum
            from ( YOUR_QUERY_GOES_HERE -- including the order by ) a
           where rownum <= MAX_ROWS )
     where rnum >= MIN_ROWS;which is discussed on asktom.oracle.com. This works from Oracle 8.1 onwards.
-- cj

How to use "with clause query" in DBadapter

Hi all,
I need to implement a "with clause" query in oracle soa 11g bpel. When i put the query in db adapter in pure sql, the schema is not getting generated properly. Can any one suggest a solution to my problem.
Regards,
Kaushik

Pure SQL won't work because it is expecting the first word in the SQL to be SELECT (or INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE).
If your query is WITH ... SELECT ...
try this:
delete everything before SELECT. Copy and paste the generated XSD to another window. The SQL test may fail, but that will just mean that it couldn't fill in the types of the columns in the SELECT ... FROM list. You can always do that yourself by hand editing the XSD (including in the wizard before you hit next). Then put back the WITH ... clause before the remaining SELECT .... If the XSD gets overwritten, copy the version you saved in the other window and paste it over top. Then hit next and the runtime should still work.
Keep in mind that SQL is very complex and hard to fully parse in the UI. However the minimum information the DbAdapter needs is quite limited; basically just the name and number of columns that are coming back. The XSD is meant to be editable in the wizard if the SQL is too complex.
Thanks
Steve

Ref cursors - 'with' clause

I am working with a procedure which is returning a ref-cursor to a Java Call. Inside the procedure I see a statment like
Open t_results for
with rfq_companies AS
select statement1),
rfq_hierarchies AS
select statement2),
rfq_relnhierarchies AS
select statement 3);
Can anybody explain such an usage for opening a ref cursor ('WITH' clause)?. What is the effect of using this and how Java will interpret this?

The procedure is still returning a REF CURSOR, regardless of the way the SELECT statements is created. There is no effect as far as Java is concerned.
Read more on the WITH clause:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_10002.htm#sthref9697
in the section: Subquery Factoring

What is equivalent to 'with clause' in oracle

what is equivalent to 'with clause' in oracle
thanks

My reqirement is :
I have a table named egroup. I have to find the name of the egroup different from "other" that can be found in the most countries in Africa
create table EGROUP(
     c_id     char(2), -- country id
     egroup     varchar2(40), -- name of the ethnic group
     percent number(4,2), -- percentage of population
     constraint egroup_fk foreign key(c_id) references COUNTRY,
     constraint egroup_pk primary key(c_id,egroup)
insert into egroup values('AF','Pashtun', 42 );
insert into egroup values('AF','Tajik',27 );
insert into egroup values('AF','Hazara',9 );
insert into egroup values('AF','Uzbek',9 );
insert into egroup values('AF','Aimak',4 );
insert into egroup values('AF','Turkmen',3 );
insert into egroup values('AF','Baloch',2 );
insert into egroup values('AF','other',4 );
insert into egroup values('AL','Albanian', 95 );
insert into egroup values('AL','Greek',3 );
insert into egroup values('AL','other',2 );
insert into egroup values('AG','Arab-Berber', 99 );
insert into egroup values('AG','European',1 );
insert into egroup values('AQ','Samoan (Polynesian)', 89 );
insert into egroup values('AQ','Caucasian',2 );

Unable to use the with clause in oracle 9.0.2

Hi,
I need to use oracle SQL with clause in oracle 9.0.2 database. Its a 9i feature but i am unable to use it.
It is giving internal error, when i try to execute it.
Even for simple query:
WITH acct_summary as ( select TOT_COLL_AMT from tdc_acct)
select TOT_COLL_AMT from acct_summary WHERE TOT_COLL_AMT>100;
Error message while using 8.0.5 sql plus client:
SP2-0642: SQL*Plus internal error state 2091, context 0:0:0
Unsafe to proceed
Please help to find out why i am not able to use the sql with clause in oracle 9.0.2 database.
Thanks and regards,
Raajkathir

Hi Jens Petersen,
Yes, You are correct. Thank you very much.
Regards,
Raja

WITH Clause query doesn't work in Oracle Reports.

Hi Gurus,
I'm using a WITH clause query and need to build a report using the same query.
But when i'm trying to build a report, query is giving error as "WITH clause table or view doesn't exists".
But the same query perfectly works in sql prompt.
Oracle Reports doesn't supports WITH clause query?
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Onkar

I ran into a similar problem before and worked around it by moving the query to a pipelined function in the database as described at WITH clause unexpectedly causes ORA-00942 in Reports Builder
Hope this helps.

Bug in WITH clause (subquery factoring clause) in Oracle 11?

I'm using WITH to perform a set comparison in order to qualify a given query as correct or incorrect regarding an existing solution. However, the query does not give the expected result - an empty set - when comparing the solution to itself in Oracle 11 whereas it does in Oracle 10. A minimal example os posted below as script. There are also some observations about changes to the tables or the query that make Oracle 11 returning correct results but in my opinion these changes must not change the semantics of the queries.
Is this a bug or am I getting something wrong? The Oracle versions are mentioned in the script.
-- Bug in WITH clause (subquery factoring clause)
-- in Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition 11.2.0.1.0?
DROP TABLE B PURGE;
DROP TABLE K PURGE;
DROP TABLE S PURGE;
CREATE TABLE S (
     m     number NOT NULL,
     x     varchar2(30) NOT NULL
CREATE TABLE K (
     k char(2) NOT NULL,
     x varchar2(50) NOT NULL
CREATE TABLE B (
     m     number NOT NULL ,
     k char(2) NOT NULL ,
     n     number
INSERT INTO S VALUES(1, 'h');
INSERT INTO S VALUES(2, 'l');
INSERT INTO S VALUES(3, 'm');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k1', 'd');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k2', 'i');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k3', 'm');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k4', 't');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k5', 't');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k6', 's');
INSERT INTO B VALUES(1, 'k1', 40);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(1, 'k2', 30);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(1, 'k4', 50);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(3, 'k1', 10);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(3, 'k2', 20);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(3, 'k1', 30);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(3, 'k6', 90);
COMMIT;
ALTER TABLE S ADD CONSTRAINT S_pk PRIMARY KEY (m);
ALTER TABLE K ADD CONSTRAINT K_pk PRIMARY KEY (k);
ALTER TABLE B ADD CONSTRAINT B_S_fk
FOREIGN KEY (m) REFERENCES S(m) ON DELETE CASCADE;
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW v AS
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC;
-- Query 1: Result should be 0
WITH q AS
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
SELECT * FROM q
MINUS
SELECT * FROM v
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM v
MINUS
SELECT * FROM q
-- COUNT(*)
-- 6
-- 1 rows selected
-- Query 2: Result set should be empty (Query 1 without counting)
WITH q AS
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
SELECT *
FROM
SELECT * FROM q
MINUS
SELECT * FROM v
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM v
MINUS
SELECT * FROM q
-- M N
-- null 10
-- null 30
-- null 40
-- 1 40
-- 3 10
-- 3 30
-- 6 rows selected
-- Observations:
-- Incorrect results in Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition 11.2.0.1.0:
-- Query 1 returns 6, Query 2 returns six rows.
-- Correct in Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition 10.2.0.1.0.
-- Correct without the foreign key.
-- Correct if attribute x is renamed in S or K.
-- Correct if attribute x is left out in S.
-- Correct without the ORDER BY clause in the definition of q.
-- Only two results if the primary key on K is left out.
-- Correct without any change if not using WITH but subqueries (see below).
-- Fixed queries
-- Query 1b: Result should be 0
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
SELECT * FROM
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
MINUS
SELECT * FROM v
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM v
MINUS
SELECT * FROM
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
-- COUNT(*)
-- 0
-- 1 rows selected
-- Query 2b: Result set shoud be empty (Query 1b without counting)
SELECT *
FROM
SELECT * FROM
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
MINUS
SELECT * FROM v
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM v
MINUS
SELECT * FROM
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
-- M N
-- 0 rows selected

You're all gonna love this one.....
The WITH clause works. But not easily.
Go ahead, build the query, (as noted in a recent thread, I, too, always use views), set the grants and make sure DISCOVERER and EULOWNER have SELECT privs.
1. Log into Disco Admin as EULOWNER. Trust me.
2. Add the view as a folder to the business area.
3. Log into Disco Desktop as EULOWNER. Don't laugh. It gets better.
4. Build the workbook and the worksheet (or just the worksheet if apropos)
5. Set the appropriate "sharing" roles and such
6. Save the workbook to the database.
7. Save the workbook to your computer.
8. Log out of Desktop.
9. Log back into Desktop as whatever, whoever you usually are to work.
10. elect "open existing workbook"
11. Select icon for "open from my computer". See? I told you it would get better!
12. Open the save .dis file from your computer.
13. Save it to the database.
14. Open a web browser and from there, you're on your own.
Fortran in VMS. Much easier and faster. I'm convinced the proliferation of the web is a detriment to the world at large...On the other hand, I'm also waiting for the Dodgers to return to Brooklyn.

With clause in oracle

how is it possible
suppose i have a query like select name ,count(),date
where <condition>
group by name,date
it return summary information like
a,2,11-nov-2007
b,4,11-nov-2007
that means it store summary info
i want to store detail info into other table
select name ,count(),date
where <same condition of above>
like a,xyz,11-nov-2007
a,abc,11-nov-2007
b,sts,11-nov-2007
b,pqs,11-nov-2007
b,stt,11-nov-2007
b,bts,11-nov-2007
so can i use WITH clause AS here.<basically i want to store summay info to a table and detail info to other table>
please help me .

After reading your post four times I still don't know what are you talking about.
select name
,count(),date
where <condition>
group by name,dateWhere is from clause?
select name ,count(),date
where <same condition of above>
like a,xyz,11-nov-2007
a,abc,11-nov-2007
b,sts,11-nov-2007
b,pqs,11-nov-2007
b,stt,11-nov-2007
b,bts,11-nov-2007Why count() returns something like abc, sts, and again - where is from clause?

Oracle SQL WITH clause support

It doesn't appear that JDeveloper 10.1.2 ADF BCs support using the WITH clause in an expert mode View. It says it's valid when tested, but the wizard loses all attribute references. Looking in the <view_object>.xml file, all attribute metdata has been removed from the file.
I can work around it easily by just repeating the sub-query. I was just wondering if it was not supported yet by the wizard, or is it a bug that I should file?
Thanks
Erik

Since it isn't extremely important in this case, I'll just assume that ADF doesn't currently support SQL99 features in case anyone else ever asksthe same question.
Thanks
Erik

DMBS_SQL.to_refcursor equivalent in Oracle 10g

Hello,
Is there any other way to get result as a refcursor in Oracle 10g with DBMS_SQL? I have the function that function generate dynamic query and execute with DBMS_SQL. This function called by java code for viewing result as report. How can I do this, is there equivalent in Oracle 10g for DMBS_SQL.to_refcursor? Please help.
Thanks,

ilkinesrefli wrote:
Is it difficult to understand my answers?Yes, because they are not accurate. You keep saying you can't use ref cursors and must use DBMS_SQL, but you have failed to show us why that is so.
It is impossible because there is dynamic where clause in my query. Show us why it's impossible.
BluShadow     please solve this one:
p_sql := 'select empno, ename, deptno from emp where deptno=:pdeptno';
if ... then
p_sql := p_sql || ' AND empno=:pempno';
end if;
...Is it possible by your way?Yes, ref cursors can be used for dynamic queries. basic example...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace function get_refcursor(p_sql in varchar2
2                                          ,p_whereclause in varchar2 := null
3                                          ,p_whereval in number := null) return sys_refcursor is
4    v_rc sys_refcursor;
5 begin
6    if p_whereval is not null then
7      open v_rc for p_sql||' where '||p_whereclause using p_whereval;
8    else
9      open v_rc for p_sql;
10    end if;
11    return v_rc;
12* end;
SQL> /
Function created.
SQL> var rc refcursor;
SQL> exec :rc := get_refcursor('select empno, ename, deptno from emp');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> print rc;
     EMPNO ENAME          DEPTNO
      7369 SMITH              20
      7499 ALLEN              30
      7521 WARD               30
      7566 JONES              20
      7654 MARTIN             30
      7698 BLAKE              30
      7782 CLARK              10
      7788 SCOTT              20
      7839 KING               10
      7844 TURNER             30
      7876 ADAMS              20
      7900 JAMES              30
      7902 FORD               20
      7934 MILLER             10
14 rows selected.
SQL> exec :rc := get_refcursor('select empno, ename, deptno from emp', 'deptno = :1', 20);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> print rc;
     EMPNO ENAME          DEPTNO
      7369 SMITH              20
      7566 JONES              20
      7788 SCOTT              20
      7876 ADAMS              20
      7902 FORD               20
SQL>So, please explain to us again why ref cursors are impossible to use and you have to use DBMS_SQL?

When you think you need write with clause of answers.

This thread is not a question.
I will use this thread to refer to in other threads, when anyone ask me "Do I have to write with clause?"
The answer is NO you don't have to write with clause AT ALL.
with clause is create temp table on the fly.
with tempTable as(
select 1 as column1,2 as column2 from dual union all
select 1 as column1,2 as column2 from dual union all
select 1 as column1,2 as column2 from dual)
select * from tempTable;If you have created the Table,you do NOT have to write with clause like above.
therefore you can write like below.
select * from tempTable;

user13091888 wrote:
I dont's see reason why you created this thread but...
Global temporary table and with clause is not equivalent. If you want select from temp table you have insert here some data first and then oracle have to create temp segment for your session. If you use with clause there is not neccessary to create temp segment for you unless you run out of your available memory e.g. making sorts, big hash joins etc.?:|
He never mentioned Global Temporary Tables.
He was saying that the subquery factoring clause is used in answers on the forum where people are temporarily creating the data for the purposes of the answer, rather than create a real table. I would guess English isn't his first language, so the way he worded it could be misconstrued, but it's fairly obviousl what he was saying, even though I agree the thread is pointless.

Issue in use of "WITH CLAUSE"

My DB version is 10.2.0
One of my query takes long time for execution and here is the Old Query,
SELECT HD.DATUM DATUM, HA2.GELDEINGAENGE_INSG-NVL(HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE,0)
GELDEINGANG, HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
FROM
( SELECT DISTINCT(TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')) DATUM
FROM TRANS_HIST H1 ,
    (SELECT BUCHUNGSGRUPPE, LFDNR, SICHERHEITBEZUG
    FROM BUCHUNGSSCHL
    WHERE STORNOMM=0) B1
WHERE H1.ERFASSDATUM >=TO_DATE('01.10'||TO_CHAR(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-9),'YYYY')||' 00.00.00','DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
AND H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE AND H1.LFDNR = B1.LFDNR
AND (H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888' OR ( H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999 AND H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100 AND B1.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1)) ) HD,
(SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM, SUM(BETRAG) GELDEINGAENGE_INSG
FROM TRANS_HIST H2,
(SELECT F.GLAEUBIGERNR,F.FORDNR,F.FORDERGNR,A.MAHN_NUM
FROM FRD_ACCT F,
(SELECT * FROM ANS_PRCH WHERE RANGMM=1) A
WHERE F.GLAEUBIGERNR=A.GLAEUBIGERNR (+) AND F.FORDNR=A.FORDNR(+)
AND F.FORDERGNR=A.FORDERGNR(+) AND NVL(F.INDIVIDUALFLAG,0)=0 ) F1
WHERE ( (F1.GLAEUBIGERNR= H2.GLAEUBIGERNR AND F1.FORDNR=H2.FORDNR AND F1.FORDERGNR=H2.FORDERGNR) OR
F1.MAHN_NUM = H2.MAHN_NUM) AND H2.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888' AND
H2.ERFASSDATUM >= TO_DATE('01.10'||TO_CHAR(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-9),'YYYY')||' 00.00.00','DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') ) HA2,
(SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM, SUM(BETRAG) VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
   FROM TRANS_HIST H3, (SELECT BUCHUNGSGRUPPE, LFDNR,
SICHERHEITBEZUG, NACHMIETVERTRAGE
FROM BUCHUNGSSCHL
WHERE STORNOMM=0) B3,
(SELECT F.GLAEUBIGERNR,F.FORDNR,F.FORDERGNR,A.MAHN_NUM
FROM FRD_ACCT F,
(SELECT * FROM ANS_PRCH WHERE RANGMM=1) A
WHERE F.GLAEUBIGERNR= A.GLAEUBIGERNR (+) AND F.FORDNR=A.FORDNR(+)
AND F.FORDERGNR=A.FORDERGNR(+) AND NVL(F.INDIVIDUALFLAG,0)=0 ) F2
WHERE ( (F2.GLAEUBIGERNR=H3.GLAEUBIGERNR AND F2.FORDNR=H3.FORDNR AND F2.FORDERGNR=H3.FORDERGNR)
OR F2.MAHN_NUM = H3.MAHN_NUM)
AND H3.ERFASSDATUM >=TO_DATE('01.10'||TO_CHAR(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-9),'YYYY')||' 00.00.00','DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE AND
H3.LFDNR = B3.LFDNR AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999
AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100 AND (B3.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1 OR B3.NACHMIETVERTRAGE =1)
GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') ) HA3
WHERE HD.DATUM=HA2.DATUM (+)
AND HD.DATUM=HA3.DATUM (+)
ORDER BY DATUM ASC
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.22       0.22          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1    469.61    1448.30    2874498    3017355          1           9
total        3    469.83    1448.53    2874498    3017355          1           9
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 62     (recursive depth: 1)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      9 SORT ORDER BY (cr=3017355 pr=2874498 pw=0 time=1448309418 us)
      9   HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER (cr=3017355 pr=2874498 pw=0 time=1448309191 us)
      9    VIEW (cr=1228085 pr=1175604 pw=0 time=906871801 us)
      9     HASH GROUP BY (cr=1228085 pr=1175604 pw=0 time=906871785 us)
   1559      CONCATENATION (cr=1228085 pr=1175604 pw=0 time=564453620 us)
    233       HASH JOIN (cr=614043 pr=589377 pw=0 time=562088377 us)
     94        TABLE ACCESS FULL BUCHUNGSSCHL (cr=29 pr=0 pw=0 time=505 us)
254136        HASH JOIN (cr=614014 pr=589377 pw=0 time=509476999 us)
497464         TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANS_HIST (cr=586339 pr=562603 pw=0 time=65783878 us)
737515         HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER (cr=27675 pr=26774 pw=0 time=18577731 us)
372656          TABLE ACCESS FULL ANS_PRCH (cr=6346 pr=5910 pw=0 time=408778 us)
737515          TABLE ACCESS FULL FRD_ACCT (cr=21329 pr=20864 pw=0 time=2254657 us)
   1326       HASH JOIN (cr=614042 pr=586227 pw=0 time=520726941 us)
     94        TABLE ACCESS FULL BUCHUNGSSCHL (cr=29 pr=0 pw=0 time=641 us)
221360        FILTER (cr=614013 pr=586227 pw=0 time=372791872 us)
221360         HASH JOIN OUTER (cr=614013 pr=586227 pw=0 time=372570499 us)
221360          HASH JOIN (cr=607668 pr=580286 pw=0 time=368077766 us)
243053           TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANS_HIST (cr=586339 pr=563978 pw=0 time=1425434011 us)
737515           TABLE ACCESS FULL FRD_ACCT (cr=21329 pr=16308 pw=0 time=8859226 us)
372656          TABLE ACCESS FULL ANS_PRCH (cr=6345 pr=5941 pw=0 time=1872464 us)
      9    HASH JOIN OUTER (cr=1789270 pr=1698894 pw=0 time=541436637 us)
      9     VIEW (cr=586667 pr=562439 pw=0 time=213337882 us)
      9      HASH UNIQUE (cr=586667 pr=562439 pw=0 time=213337873 us)
748717       HASH JOIN (cr=586667 pr=562439 pw=0 time=104432018 us)
    830        TABLE ACCESS FULL BUCHUNGSSCHL (cr=29 pr=0 pw=0 time=1042 us)
1241936        TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANS_HIST (cr=586638 pr=562439 pw=0 time=339666777 us)
      9     VIEW (cr=1202603 pr=1136455 pw=0 time=328097826 us)
      9      HASH GROUP BY (cr=1202603 pr=1136455 pw=0 time=328097809 us)
695373       CONCATENATION (cr=1202603 pr=1136455 pw=0 time=324453471 us)
      0        HASH JOIN (cr=587003 pr=557994 pw=0 time=167168982 us)
744472         TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANS_HIST (cr=587003 pr=557994 pw=0 time=30622271 us)
      0         HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      0          TABLE ACCESS FULL ANS_PRCH (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      0          TABLE ACCESS FULL FRD_ACCT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
695373        FILTER (cr=615600 pr=578461 pw=0 time=157284464 us)
695373         HASH JOIN OUTER (cr=615600 pr=578461 pw=0 time=156589072 us)
695373          HASH JOIN (cr=609255 pr=572518 pw=0 time=150571393 us)
744472           TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANS_HIST (cr=587926 pr=556115 pw=0 time=31820718 us)
737515           TABLE ACCESS FULL FRD_ACCT (cr=21329 pr=16403 pw=0 time=3696334 us)
372656          TABLE ACCESS FULL ANS_PRCH (cr=6345 pr=5943 pw=0 time=391928 us)I tried fine tuning the query using "With Clause" but landed up with oracle error, which prevents me from using with clause inside a paranthesis.
SELECT HD.DATUM DATUM, HA2.GELDEINGAENGE_INSG-NVL(HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE,0)
GELDEINGANG, HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
FROM
( WITH HIST_VIEW AS (SELECT GLAEUBIGERNR,FORDNR,FORDERGNR,MAHN_NUM,BUCHUNGSGRUPPE,LFDNR,STORNOMM,ERFASSDATUM,BETRAG
                     FROM TRANS_HIST H
                     WHERE ERFASSDATUM >=TO_DATE('01.10'||TO_CHAR(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-9),'YYYY')||' 00.00.00','DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
                     AND (H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888' OR ( H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999 AND H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100))),
       FORD_VIEW AS (SELECT F.GLAEUBIGERNR,F.FORDNR,F.FORDERGNR,A.MAHN_NUM
                     FROM FRD_ACCT F,ANS_PRCH A
                     WHERE F.GLAEUBIGERNR=A.GLAEUBIGERNR(+) AND F.FORDNR=A.FORDNR(+)
                     AND F.FORDERGNR=A.FORDERGNR(+) AND NVL(F.INDIVIDUALFLAG,0)=0 AND A.RANGMM=1)
(SELECT DISTINCT(TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')) DATUM
FROM HIST_VIEW H1 ,BUCHUNGSSCHL B1
WHERE B1.STORNOMM=0 AND H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE AND H1.LFDNR = B1.LFDNR
AND (H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888' OR (H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999 AND H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100 AND B1.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1))) HD,
(SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM, SUM(BETRAG) GELDEINGAENGE_INSG
FROM HIST_VIEW H2,FORD_VIEW F1
WHERE ((F1.GLAEUBIGERNR= H2.GLAEUBIGERNR AND F1.FORDNR=H2.FORDNR AND F1.FORDERGNR=H2.FORDERGNR) OR
F1.MAHN_NUM = H2.MAHN_NUM) AND H2.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888'
GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') ) HA2,
(SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM, SUM(BETRAG) VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
FROM HIST_VIEW H3, BUCHUNGSSCHL B3,FORD_VIEW F2
WHERE ((F2.GLAEUBIGERNR=H3.GLAEUBIGERNR AND F2.FORDNR=H3.FORDNR
AND F2.FORDERGNR=H3.FORDERGNR) OR F2.MAHN_NUM = H3.MAHN_NUM) AND B3.STORNOMM=0
AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE AND
H3.LFDNR = B3.LFDNR AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999
AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100 AND (B3.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1 OR B3.NACHMIETVERTRAGE =1)
GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')) HA3
WHERE HD.DATUM=HA2.DATUM (+)
AND HD.DATUM=HA3.DATUM (+)
ORDER BY DATUM ASC )
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis

If you format your code it makes it far easier to spot mistakes...
WITH HIST_VIEW AS (SELECT GLAEUBIGERNR,FORDNR,FORDERGNR,MAHN_NUM,BUCHUNGSGRUPPE,LFDNR,STORNOMM,ERFASSDATUM,BETRAG
                   FROM   TRANS_HIST H
                   WHERE ERFASSDATUM >=TO_DATE('01.10'||TO_CHAR(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-9),'YYYY')||' 00.00.00','DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
                   AND   ( H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888'
                        OR (H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999 AND H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100)
     FORD_VIEW AS (SELECT F.GLAEUBIGERNR,F.FORDNR,F.FORDERGNR,A.MAHN_NUM
                   FROM   FRD_ACCT F,ANS_PRCH A
                   WHERE F.GLAEUBIGERNR=A.GLAEUBIGERNR(+)
                   AND    F.FORDNR=A.FORDNR(+)
                   AND    F.FORDERGNR=A.FORDERGNR(+)
                   AND    NVL(F.INDIVIDUALFLAG,0)=0
                   AND    A.RANGMM=1
SELECT HD.DATUM DATUM
      ,HA2.GELDEINGAENGE_INSG-NVL(HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE,0) GELDEINGANG
      ,HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT(TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')) DATUM
       FROM   HIST_VIEW H1
             ,BUCHUNGSSCHL B1
       WHERE B1.STORNOMM=0
       AND    H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE
       AND    H1.LFDNR = B1.LFDNR
       AND   ( H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888'
            OR (H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999 AND H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100 AND B1.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1)
      ) HD,
      (SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM
             ,SUM(BETRAG) GELDEINGAENGE_INSG
       FROM   HIST_VIEW H2
             ,FORD_VIEW F1
       WHERE (
               (    F1.GLAEUBIGERNR= H2.GLAEUBIGERNR
                AND F1.FORDNR=H2.FORDNR
                AND F1.FORDERGNR=H2.FORDERGNR
             OR
                F1.MAHN_NUM = H2.MAHN_NUM
       AND   H2.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888'
       GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')
      ) HA2,
      (SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM
             ,SUM(BETRAG) VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
       FROM   HIST_VIEW H3
             ,BUCHUNGSSCHL B3
             ,FORD_VIEW F2
       WHERE (
               (    F2.GLAEUBIGERNR=H3.GLAEUBIGERNR
                AND F2.FORDNR=H3.FORDNR
                AND F2.FORDERGNR=H3.FORDERGNR
             OR
               F2.MAHN_NUM = H3.MAHN_NUM
       AND B3.STORNOMM=0
       AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE
       AND H3.LFDNR = B3.LFDNR
       AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999
       AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100
       AND (B3.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1 OR B3.NACHMIETVERTRAGE =1)
       GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')
      ) HA3
WHERE HD.DATUM=HA2.DATUM (+)
AND   HD.DATUM=HA3.DATUM (+)
ORDER BY DATUM ASC
) <--- What's this doing on the end?Remove that last bracket and you should be ok.
I took the liberty of putting the subquery factoring at the beginning, so see if that works.

OPEN CURSOR using a WITH clause in the select query

Hi,
I am using Oracle 9i. I have a requirement where I have a REFCURSOR as an OUT parameter for my procedure. I have declared the TYPE and created the procedure.
In the procedure, I am using OPEN <cursor_name> FOR <query>;
Ideally this works in most of the cases that I have tried earlier. However, in the current case I am using a WITH clause in my query to get the results.
I need help in understanding if the above mentioned syntax would not allow me to use the WITH clause in the query.

What error do you get , seems to work ok for me on 10g
SQL> begin
2 open :cv for 'with x as (select * from emp) select * from x';
3 end;
4 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> print :cv
     EMPNO
ENAME
JOB              MGR HIREDATE         SAL       COMM     DEPTNO
      7521
WARD
SALESMAN        7698 22-FEB-81       1250        500         30
      7566
JONES
MANAGER         7839 02-APR-81       2975                    20
     EMPNO

Report with multiplying columns and WITH clause

Hello
I saw sth strange in my report. I assume that it could happens very often.
I have report with few columns which two of them ar most complicated (many joins subqueries aggreagations on joined values etc.) These two columns (i.e C3,C4) should be multiplied (C3*C4).
When i do pure report without multiplying only columns C1,C2,C3,C4 everything is ok - duration about 15 sec. but... when I put next column on report which multiply these columns (in Answers C5=C3*C4)
I wait 3-4 minutes and my database hungs :(. After investigation I saw that in first case to databese goes pure "SELECT" statement it means:
"Select ... as C1, ... as C2, max(...) as C3, sum(xxx)... C4 from yyy,sss,ttt WHERE aaa"
but in second case BI uses WITH clause it means:
WITH SAWITH0 AS
( Select ... as C1, ... as C2, max(...) as C3, sum(xxx)... C4 from yyy,sss,ttt WHERE aaa )
SELECT SAWITH0.C1 as C1,
SAWITH0.C2 as C2,
     SAWITH0.C3 as C3,
     SAWITH0.C4 as C4,
     SAWITH0.C3*SAWITH0.C4 as C5 FROM SSS
and this statement is long runninq query and kills my database :(.
I checked that SQL like this:
Select ... as C1, ... as C2, max(...) as C3, sum(xxx)... C4, max(...)*sum(xxx)... As C5 from yyy,sss,ttt WHERE aaa" -
runs few times faster than that above
I know that I can do this multiply in business model layer but sometimes users can multiply(or other operations) on columns in reports without my knowledge and it kills my db :(. Where is bug? Why SQLs with WITH clause takes so much db time?
Thank you for each kind of help

WITH clause or Subquery Factoring allows the set of data to be reused multiple times within the SQL. Oracle will usually materialize the data into a temporary table (you will see it if you take an explain plan of the SQL).
I would be surprised if it was the actual WITH clause that was causing the performance issue, however you can test this by turning the WITH clause feature off. Go to the Physical model, right mouse click on your Database > Properties > Features Tab, scroll down to WITH_CLAUSE_SUPPORTED and switch it off.
I'd be interested to know if you do see actual improvement.
Good Luck.

WITH clause equivalent in oracle 8i

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for