With Holding Tax provided in IDOC FIDCC2 is not getting updated in Acc Doc
Hi All,
I am Posting a Accounting document in R/3 though Idoc FIDCCP02.
This idoc has With holding Tax info segment as E1FIXWT. i gave all the info in this segment, like Tax code, Tax type , Withholding tax base amount (local currency) , Withholding tax base amount in document currency, Withholding tax amount (in local currencyand Withholding tax amount in document currency
However, when the Idoc gets posted,and the accounting document gets generated the With holding tab does not get populated in SAP.
Please let me know your inputs, that why the woth holding tab is not getting populated with the relevant info from Idoc.
Thanks in advance
Hi,
I have the same issue. But as the idoc is generated in a SAP system of the same release I would have expected that the withholding tax data is already complete. Also are no withholding tax info populated in IT_ACCTX. There only VAT is visible. I suppose IT_ACCWT was meant.
Anyone any idea?
Regards
Stefanie
Similar Messages
-
With holding tax decuction from T.Code F-02 with out sp. gl indicator
Hi All,
While making the payt to service vendor my client do not want to use the functionality of advance payt, which can be performed through T.code F-48. They wants to treat this advance payt as a normal payt to vendor but they want to deduct the with holding tax from this payt.
I have tries to use T.code F-02 with posting keys 25 Dr Vendor & 50 cr Bank. But when i am using this posting key for vendor (i.e.25) System gives me warning message saying with holding tax information is ignored & system do not deduct TDS from the payt made to vendor.
But when i am using PK 29 with sp gl indicator A for advances from T.Code F-02 system allows me to deduct the with holding tax against vendor paytment.
Please guide me how to duduct the with holding tax from vendor payt. without using sp. GL indicator for advances.
Thanks
SonalHi
why ur clien not want advance paymeny through Special GL, what is the issue/purpose
see TDS deducted at the time of Advance payment and at the time of invoice
when u use F-02 for TDS deduct of vendor without using special GL and u useing 25 vendor and 50 bank
in this case tds not deducted here vendoir is debit but withouse advance indicator
becuase u given vendor advance , but in this case entry not showing advance or
in SAP Standard system TDS deducted of advance payment when u using 29 posting key for vendor this is stsndard key of advance vendor
so convience ur clien u use Advance payment method with Special GL, if they not agree then ask what is the purpose u not using Speacial GL through Advance paument
if any query, revert back
Regards
Roobal -
With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term
Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PMDear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15% = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20% = $ 20,000 ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20% = $ 20,000 ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar -
Dear Sapgurus,
we are using 2 different with holding tax type one is at the time of inv posting and 2nd is payment posting which is earlier, we had created tax types and tax codes we assigned in vendor master assgined to company code and automatic posting also, finally if any vendor pay advance then we calculate tds it will post to tds g/l account, after that in sap any option how to file the tds returns.
Regards
VeeruDear,
Once you have posted TDS then usually at the month end you will run below transaction to complete the process..
1. Use transcation J1INCHLN (this will club all TDS posted per section and paid)
2. Use transaction J1INBANK (when you make TDS payment in Bank then bank will give you challan number which you have to update in the system)
3. Use transaction J1INCERT (this will print the vendor certificate (this is usually an year end practice)
4. Use transaction J1INMIS (this will provide consolidated report for TDS)
Regards,
Chintan Joshi -
Hi all,
I have an issue relating to with holding tax. wtax code is not picking the percentage ammount while doing the transaction.Please provide the solution.
Regards,
Suma.What r u doing Invoicing or Advance payment. Pls chk in Config whether u have maintained percentage for that particular Tax code
SPRO
Financial Accounting --> Financial Accounting Global Settings -->
Withholding Tax --> Extended Withholding Tax --> Calculation --> Withholding Tax Code --> Define Withholding Tax Codes
And chk in Vendor Master also whether they have maintained any Exemption code or percentage.
If this information is useful. Pls assign Points -
Restriction of some with holding tax code when doing F-43
Dear All,
How can i restrict previous fiscal year's with holding tax codes while creating a vendor invoice (i.e F-43).
Its an urgent requirement, i would really appreciate if some one gives the input.
Thanks
SureshDear Rob,
yeah i know that, but unfortunately i cannot write the validation because the pre-requisite condition requires an entry from WITH_ITEM table, which is not there in the list of structures and tables while writing the validation.
Please provide the alternate or else let me know how to include the WITH_ITEM table in the list of structures & tables.
Thanks
Ravi -
With holding tax report with material and qty fields
Dear All,
Is there any standard report available with with holding tax data with material and qty fields.
Thanks,
Sekhar.dear Friend,
Withholding tax will deduct on services. Hence Material and quantity is not relavent.
There is no report is available also.
reg
Madhu M -
With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001
Hi Guru's,
I have an issue, is there any impact to change the withholding tax base amount 20% instead of 10%.When I change the base amount to 20% and post a document system return error message
"With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001".Guide me on this issue.
And tell me the impact of previous open item documents.
Regards
Maruthi.Thanks for all,
MY problem solved.
Regards
Maruthi -
Customer master with holding tax data
Hi,
I am working on customer master transaction 'XD01'. I want add new fields to the existing subscreen 'with holding tax' and new fields in the new subscreen. There is no enhancement is available for this, but there a BADI 'CUSTOMER_ADD_DATA_CS'. But with this we can not update the data to table KNBW(with holding tax data). Can anybody worked on this type of requirements.
Thanks in Advance
Rajavardhana ReddyHi Rajavardhana
Here there two interfaces you can use for transfering data to database and getting data from database.
SET_DATA Data Transfer
GET_DATA Transfer Data
Hope this helps you.
Cheers
Manohar -
Calculation of with holding tax
The requirement goes like this.
We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.Hi,
i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
Best regards. -
India -With Holding Tax - Changes As per the Budget Approval
Dear All
Many of you are aware, there will not be any surcharge, education & higher education cess for with holding tax in Indai from 01.10.2009.
Our client is operating seperate tax codes for Basic Duty, Surcharge and Education Cess. We have change the configuration and maintained 0% in the formula for calculating with holding tax for surcharge and education cessand we have maintained with the validity from 01.10.2009
(ie., The above solution we thought because, we wish to maintain the same tax code and with out modifying the vendor master)
Now, the system is working fine for all the scenarios, except the transfer of the old advances from special gl indicator to normal line item through T.Code (F-54). Under this T-code, the system is reversing only basic duty at old rates with out surcharge and cess.
Kindly suggest the solution to reverse the surcharge and cess while doing F-54 with the posting dates as 01.10.2009 onwards
Regards
AnilkumarPlease go through the SAP note 1359268 for budget changes
also see the 1369775,1371380,1372734 for your exact requirement -
Re: With holding tax is not picking up while excution of RERAPP
Dear team,
While executing the RERAPP.With holding tax is not picked.We are working on 4.7 version.We had suggested a badi to pull the with holding tax field.Still system is not showing any caluculation.Plz advice us if any one of you did the immplimenttation in 4.7 and how you resolved this problem .So that it would be help ful for us too.Please do the need ful.
Regards,
Suma.Dear Sir,
What we did is all the with holding tax data include the basic amount calculations manually in excel there after given the input to the system through accounting interface. You can try with your abaper. Plz make sure that GL code length and currency .This has been done through so much work around. Technical person will guide you .If you still facing the problem where exactly your facing then i can help you out.Please be more clear what you did till now then only i can explain you with clarity.
Regards,
Suma. -
Hi friends,
We do not do any with holding, so we have configured witholding tax functionality with 0%
now when I ran the 1099-misc report , it shows that certain invoices has portion of amount going into with holding exempt in reporting currency and did not show year to date payments on 1099 report.
Amount for with holding base does not tie up with payments made to them and so year to date payments does not tie on 1099 report.
please help.
Uergent
points to useful answsers
Thanksplease help!!!!!!
-
Regarding With holding tax with CIN version
Hello SAP gurus
I've done all the configuration required for the extended withholding tax type-also have updated the tax type and code in the vendor master.
How to configure automatic surcharge & education cess., With holding tax certificate . What is business place in tds.How to create remittance challan for tds.what is clearing of invoice against down payment.How to create Annual returns of tds.
While making tds entry with miro, systeam taking dummy profit center.
So what does configuration required for above error.
I will assign full points
Regards
DivyaHi,
If i am not wrong, the system is reverseing the deduction it has made at the time of adv payment.
Its not deducting again.
Consolidate all the three documents -
- Adv pay
- Inv
- Payment
and you would appreciate the beauty of the concept.
Cheers
Raghu -
Hi,
If i select With holding tab when entering Down payment request,Down payment and invoice for vendor, i am getting error message as Withholding Tax information missing from line item
Could you advise me where i made wrong cogfiguration for with holding tax.
Your immediate response will be highly appreciated.
With regards,
V.KHi
Check Feild status group of G067 in OB14 and make sure that these are optional and also the Feild status group of WHT GL accounts you have assigned.
There is always a possibility that these are in suppressed state.
Award points if useful.
sarma
Maybe you are looking for
-
Wrong sequence in selection screen generated by ABAP Query
Hi, I am developing a query to display the data in the view. My query has 8 selection fields totally. As part of my requirement I have added selection parameter in the selections tab of the infoset and maintained the sequence as 9. Inspite of maintai
-
Hello all, We are currently having a problem with submitting process chains. When the chain runs it does not display any of steps in the process chain and where they are running from the job we submit (RSI_START_BW_CHAIN) So what we see is that the P
-
How to bulk add group members in Open Directory
So the workgroup manager interface is ghey. The + sign to add group members drag&drops users one at a time. I need to bulk add group members. I tried ldapadd to add all the users quickly and that doesn't seem to work. The ldap group record now has al
-
Officejet 6000 wireless connect to Mac and Windows machines?
Just bought this printer. Is it possible to use Windows XP and Mac, to print?
-
I cannot update my apps at it says not enough local storage. I purchased more storage on the iCloud. What can I do to be allowed to be able update/ download apps?