With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001

Hi Guru's,
I have an issue, is there any impact to change the withholding tax base amount 20% instead of 10%.When I change the base amount to 20% and post a document system return error message
"With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001".Guide me on this issue.
And tell me the impact of previous open item documents.
Regards
Maruthi.

Thanks for all,
MY problem solved.
Regards
Maruthi

Similar Messages

Withholding tax amount exceeds the customer/vendor line item amount 001

Hi Guys,
I am trying to release an invoice using VF02 transaction but I recieved the below error message:
Message no. 7Q321
Withholding tax amount exceeds the customer/vendor line item amount 001
There are 2 SAP (718078 and 513201) notes regarding that but they are not applicable in ECC 6.0.
How can I figure out this issue?
Thanks,
Daniel Dorta

Hi,
This may happen because you have give base exemption and after that charge tax. In this case you have posted earlier invoice w/o wht and now you are posting the small amount of invoice on which wht is calculated including the earlier exempt amt. In this case the wht exceeds the base amt.
In this case if possible you first post the invoice with sufficient amount which can deduct the WHT .
If your scenario is different give details.
Regards
Milind Sonalkar

Withholding tax amount exceeds the customer/vendor line item amount

Hi experts
I am having one problem please help me
My user created one down payment, entry is like this
Vendor Dr-193914
To TDS 3878
To Bank 190036
After this he has booked MIRO with the same value 193914 & has deducted TDS 3878 over that invoice
Now when he is going to adjjust that down payment against that MIRO with specific line item 62
system is throwing that error.
Withholding tax amount exceeds the customer/vendor line item amount 002
Message no. 7Q321
I checked invoice booked correctly & TDS also dedcuted properly why system is throwing that error message
please help me
Regards
Nitin Shukla

Hi Madhu
thanks a lot for instant reply
We are using F-54 Down Payment adjustment at this time we are facing problem & we are clearing against invoice
& with specific line item
For Eg. 5100001596 & line item - 53
Regards
Nitin Shukla

Wht tax amount exceeds the customer/vendor line item amount 001Mess no7Q321

Dear Experts,
We are also getting same error in production"Withholding tax amount exceeds the customer/vendor line item amount 001 Message no. 7Q321"
Please gudie me how to resolve this issue, while posting vendor invoice in T-code - F-43 i am getting bellow error message why because we client requirement is accumulation activity required so is there any solution for this with out changing accumulation activity.
We need to use this accumulation activity.
I would be greatful if you could help us to resolve this issue.
thanks
Seshu

If its relating to TRM- Transaction manager, please implement note no " 1961340 - Calculation of withholding tax for 2nd or 3rd local currency "
Regards
Anil

Withholding tax amount exceeds the customer/vendor line item amt (in MIRO)

Dear Gurus,
MIGO done for 8 material line items WHT has been posted for 7 line items during MIRO. For 8th line item while doing MIRO, the above error is displayed. Kindly advise the possible reason and solution.
Thanks in advance,
Sadashivan

Der AVD,
Thanks for your kind response. Currently, in Central Invoice - no Central Invoice is checked.
Is it OK. For Central Inv. & 1st P.pmt. indicator, the help document says it is used in Argentina only.
We have not yet proceeded for payment stage. Still MIRO has to be completed for the MIGO done
for last line item and thereafter the payment will be done. It is right to clear the downpayment
for the 7 invoices generated now so that this error will not come during MIRO for 8th line item.
In the meantime, I will also go through the SAP notes referred by you.
Thanks and regards,
Sadashivan

Withholding tax showing zero value in vendor line item display report

Hello Friends,
I have facing one strange issue in withholding tax, when im executing report of vendor line item display(fbl1n tcode) the column for withholding tax is showing zero value for some documents even though the tax is been deducted which is clearly visible in f-02 entry.
Kindly help me on this!
Regards,
Sunny

Hi,
1.Please check the WHT config has been done properly.
2.Check the vendor master and varify tax fields are filled up.
Regards

With holding tax deducting at the time of APP

Hi,
I configured the WHT of payment and Invoice and assigned the same to the vendor. I made the WHT base as manual and posted the amount manually both at the time of down payment and at the time of invoice.. But the system is again deducting the TDS while I am making the payment to vendor through APP. Could you please explain what settings I have to do in order to not to deduct TDS at the time of APP
Advance Thanks
Koteswara Rao

Hi,
It is not nullifying it is deducting again at the time of payment.
At the time of advance payment
Vendor a/c Dr 5000
To TDS             100
To Bank           4900
At the time of invoice posting ( invoice is for 10000)
Exp A/c dr            10000
To TDS on 5000       100
To Vendor              9900
When I am tryingto make the payment of balance 5000 through APP it is deducting again 100/- and paying only 4900 to vendor.. Hope this is clear and please now tell me what the problem

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

Calculation of with holding tax

The requirement goes like this.
We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.

Hi,
i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
Best regards.

WITH HOLDING TAX ON DOWN PAYMENT

HI
I am using TCode F-47 for down payment request to be paid to vendor. In Vendor Master Record with holding tax information is activated. But at the time of processing payment against down payment request using TCode F-58 With holding tax not deducted and full down payment requested amount getting debited to vendor.
Pl suggest me
Message was edited by:
Chandrakant.K Acharya

Hi Chandrakanth
u check once WHT settings at WHT type for Payment posting.here you remove inherit base option. for Cess claculating on TDS.
you check once define WHT codes for cess. here you calculate for 1% cess 0.022 % on TDS base amount or invoice amount. ex: inv: 100 , TDS 2.2 %. Cess 1% on 2.2% means 0.0220. like that you calculate.
Then you update cess tax codes in FK02,here u select liability option.
Then you can use f-47. here system showing popup with Base amount,TDS & cess codes.then you save it.
now you check with f-58. other wise you want temporly solution. go to FB02 change doc. there you can modify WHT amounts then save it.
ok all the best
Raj

With Holding tax On Down Payment not picking

Dear All,
I have configured with holding tax on Payment posting, assigned to vendor,company code it is working fine for invoice positng and vendor payment.
When I am trying to post down payment f-48 the with holding tax codes selection screen is not pop-up or it calculates with holding tax.
Why the with holding tax selection tax is not displaying.
B.S.Rao

Hi,
1. Please check withholding tax type is assigned to the company code, IMG: Withholding tax>Extended withholding Tax>Company Code>Assigned Withholding Tax Types to Company Code.
Note: also check the here the proper dates u201Cw/tax obligated frmu201D and u201COblig.to w/tax untilu201D e.g. 01.01.1900 and 31.12.9999.
2. Go to OBWW also check the GL is assigned or not.
3. Also check the field status of recon. account & alternative recon account assigned for special GL for down payment, fields e.g withholding tax code and withholding tax amounts etc. should not be suppressed.
Thanks
Javed

Re: With holding tax is not picking up while excution of RERAPP

Dear team,
While executing the RERAPP.With holding tax is not picked.We are working on 4.7 version.We had suggested a badi to pull the with holding tax field.Still system is not showing any caluculation.Plz advice us if any one of you did the immplimenttation in 4.7 and how you resolved this problem .So that it would be help ful for us too.Please do the need ful.
Regards,
Suma.

Dear Sir,
What we did is all the with holding tax data include the basic amount calculations manually in excel there after given the input to the system through accounting interface. You can try with your abaper. Plz make sure that GL code length and currency .This has been done through so much work around. Technical person will guide you .If you still facing the problem where exactly your facing then i can help you out.Please be more clear what you did till now then only i can explain you with clarity.
Regards,
Suma.

Restriction of some with holding tax code when doing F-43

Dear All,
       How can i restrict previous fiscal year's with holding tax codes while creating a vendor invoice (i.e F-43).
      Its an urgent requirement, i would really appreciate if some one gives the input.
Thanks
Suresh

Dear Rob,
          yeah i know that, but unfortunately i cannot write the validation because the pre-requisite condition requires an entry from WITH_ITEM table, which is not there in the list of structures and tables while writing the validation.
         Please provide the alternate or else let me know how to include the WITH_ITEM table in the list of structures & tables.
Thanks
Ravi

Change of line item amount in miro

hi,
i have a doubt on the change of line item amount field value at PO reference tab in MIRO.
1) when vendor invoice price higher than PO, although knowing that the price is incorrectly quoted by vendor, we need to change the amount in PO reference tab line item according to invoice?
2) the difference in point 1 will hit stock account (map) or price difference.
3) when vendor later on give CN, we need to do subsequent credit.
4) in subsequent credit, need to create with reference to PO.
5) we need to change the amount at PO reference item line according to CN?
thanks

Hi,
1) when vendor invoice price higher than PO, although knowing that the price is incorrectly quoted by vendor, we need to change the amount in PO reference tab line item according to invoice? --- Yes you have to change it to Vemdor invoice amount
2) the difference in point 1 will hit stock account (map) or price difference. --- Yes
3) when vendor later on give CN, we need to do subsequent credit. -
Yes with ref to PO
4) in subsequent credit, need to create with reference to PO. -
Yes
5) we need to change the amount at PO reference item line according to CN? -- yes.
Other Option
You can use invoice reduction - System will create Inoice and credit memo in the same document.
SPRO Steeting require :
1. G/L account should be assigned to RKA trnsaction ket in OBYC.
2. Document type KG should be defined in Transaction code MIRO in customizing for doucment type invoice verification / Valuation in SPRO.
3. Number range should be defined for Doc type KG.
Regards,
Shailesh Mackwan

Due date in vendor line items

I would like to know if it is possible via Customizing to get the due date taking into account a calendar in order to avoid the due date in a non-working date.
If it's not possible via Customizing, how can we get it?
Does the standard cover this requirement?
Thanks a lot in adavance.

Hello Montserrat,
I am not sure whether the functionality can be established via Customizing...based on Customer or Vendor Payment Terms (OBB8).
But, I can advise a solution that can be acheived programatically (technically).
Configure a Substitution step (OBBH), may be for item level, in the form of User-exit and inform your developer to embed the logic for verifying the Due Date in the customer/vendor line item against the calender (using appropriate function modules that are available in the standard) and substitute the Due Date to a working day, if required.
Hope this helps you in resolving the problem.
Pls reward if helpful.
With Regards
Vijay Gajavalli

With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for