With holding tax should deduct on down payment

hi gurus,
        Pls help me out regarding this issue,  while iam paying down payment to vendors, i will cut the TDS and i will pay it to him, while raising an invoice the TDS should automatically adjust the invoice amount. pls send me the configuration steps.
Points will be awarded for help ful answer,
thanks in advance,
Regards,
sandeep.ch

Hi Sandeep
In the SPRO, select central invoice prop.
After posting the vendor invoice, clear the down payment against this document using F-54.  The amount deducted when posting advance will get adjusted with invoice TDS
TDS will not automatically adjust against invoice.
Regards
Murali

Similar Messages

  • WITH HOLDING TAX ON DOWN PAYMENT

    HI
    I am  using TCode F-47 for down payment request to be paid to vendor. In Vendor Master Record with holding tax information is activated. But at the time of processing payment against down payment request using TCode F-58 With holding tax not deducted and full down payment requested amount getting debited to vendor.
    Pl suggest me
    Message was edited by:
            Chandrakant.K Acharya

    Hi Chandrakanth
    u check once WHT settings at WHT type for Payment posting.here you remove inherit base option. for Cess claculating on TDS.
    you check once define WHT codes for cess. here you calculate  for 1% cess 0.022 % on TDS base amount or invoice amount. ex: inv: 100 , TDS 2.2 %. Cess 1% on 2.2% means 0.0220. like that you calculate.
    Then you update cess tax codes in FK02,here u  select liability option.
    Then you can use f-47. here system showing popup with Base amount,TDS & cess codes.then you save it.
    now you check with f-58. other wise you want temporly solution. go to FB02 change doc. there you can modify WHT amounts then save it.
    ok all the best
    Raj

  • With Holding tax On Down Payment not picking

    Dear All,
    I have configured with holding tax on Payment posting, assigned to vendor,company code it is working fine for invoice positng and vendor payment.
    When I am trying to post down payment f-48 the with holding tax codes selection screen is not pop-up or it calculates with holding tax.
    Why the with holding tax selection tax is not displaying.
    B.S.Rao

    Hi,
    1. Please check withholding tax type is assigned to the company code, IMG: Withholding tax>Extended withholding Tax>Company Code>Assigned Withholding Tax Types to Company Code.
    Note: also check the here the proper dates u201Cw/tax obligated frmu201D and u201COblig.to w/tax untilu201D e.g. 01.01.1900 and 31.12.9999.
    2. Go to OBWW also check the GL is assigned or not.
    3. Also check the field status of recon. account & alternative recon account assigned for special GL for down payment, fields e.g withholding tax code and withholding tax amounts etc. should not be suppressed.
    Thanks
    Javed

  • With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

    Hi Friends,
    We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
    Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
    As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
    With holding tax rate is 0%,
    Based on modified net amount calculation
    and
    Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
    When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
    Which causes difference in 1099 – misc vendors
    Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
    Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
    Payment going out=
    $1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 – 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
    With holding base calculation =
    $ 1000 – 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
    Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 – 900 = 8.98
    Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
    Moreover, please tell me if it’s normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
    Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
    Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

    Dear All
    i am also having the same problem. The example is
    Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
    Input Tax @ 15%   = $  15,000
    Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
    Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
    On payment the system behavior should be
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325  ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
    However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220  ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
    this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
    Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

  • Query Regarding With holding tax deducted

    Hi,
    Hi,
    I am facing one problem with With Holding Tax deduction.
    Let us explaining with example: 
    1)  Ist I passed one entry through T.Code: f-48 then deducted some TDS (Rs. 5000/- down payment).
    2) IInd I passed one invoice T.Code:  f-43 then deducted TDS (Invoice amount Rs. 10000/- but tds base amount entered Rs. 5000/-).
    Here above I passed two entries and deducted total amount of TDS. 
    3) While at the time of balance amount payment T.Code:  F-53 again system will deduct TDS. 
    I am facing problem here. Why system is again deduct TDS at the time of balance payment.  Already balance amount of TDS duducted at time of Invoice.
    Please suggest.
    Regards
    Srinivas Gundala

    Hi,
    If i am not wrong, the system is reverseing the deduction it has made at the time of adv payment.
    Its not deducting again.
    Consolidate all the three documents -
    - Adv pay
    - Inv
    - Payment
    and you would appreciate the beauty of the concept.
    Cheers
    Raghu

  • Regarding With holding tax with CIN version

    Hello SAP gurus
    I've done all the configuration required for the extended withholding tax type-also have updated the tax type and code in the vendor master.
    How to configure automatic surcharge & education cess., With holding tax certificate . What is business place in tds.How to create remittance challan for tds.what is clearing of invoice against down payment.How to create Annual returns of tds.
    While making tds entry with miro, systeam taking dummy profit center.
    So what does configuration required for above error.
    I will assign full points
    Regards
    Divya

    Hi,
    If i am not wrong, the system is reverseing the deduction it has made at the time of adv payment.
    Its not deducting again.
    Consolidate all the three documents -
    - Adv pay
    - Inv
    - Payment
    and you would appreciate the beauty of the concept.
    Cheers
    Raghu

  • With holding tax

    Hi,
    If  i  select With holding  tab  when   entering Down payment request,Down payment and invoice for vendor,  i  am getting error message as  Withholding Tax information missing from line item
    Could you advise me where i made wrong cogfiguration for with holding tax.
    Your immediate response will be highly appreciated.
    With regards,
    V.K

    Hi
    Check Feild status group of G067 in OB14 and make sure that these are optional and also the Feild status group of WHT GL accounts you have assigned.
    There is always a possibility that these are in suppressed state.
    Award points if useful.
    sarma

  • With holding tax decuction from T.Code F-02 with out sp. gl indicator

    Hi All,
    While making the payt to service vendor my client do not want to use the functionality of advance payt, which can be performed through T.code F-48. They wants to treat this advance payt as a normal payt to vendor but they want to deduct the with holding tax from this payt.
    I have tries to use T.code F-02 with posting keys 25 Dr Vendor & 50 cr Bank. But when i am using this posting key for vendor (i.e.25) System gives me warning message saying with holding tax information is ignored & system do not deduct TDS from the payt made to vendor.
    But when i am using PK 29 with sp gl indicator A for advances from T.Code F-02 system allows me to deduct the with holding tax against vendor paytment.
    Please guide me how to duduct the with holding tax from vendor payt. without using sp. GL indicator for advances.
    Thanks
    Sonal

    Hi
    why ur clien not want advance paymeny through Special GL, what is the issue/purpose
    see TDS deducted at the time of Advance payment and at the time of invoice
    when u use F-02 for TDS deduct of vendor without using special GL and u useing 25 vendor and 50 bank
    in this case tds not deducted here vendoir is debit but withouse advance indicator
    becuase u given vendor advance , but in this case entry not showing advance or
    in SAP Standard system TDS deducted of advance payment when u using 29 posting key for vendor this is stsndard key of advance vendor
    so convience ur clien u use Advance payment method with Special GL, if they not agree then ask what is the purpose u not using Speacial GL through Advance paument
    if any query, revert back
    Regards
    Roobal

  • Regarding the Grossing up Method for With holding Tax

    Hi
    I am implementing SAP ECC 6.0. I am having a specific requirement with regard to With holding TAX. If i configure the WT, the tax amount will be deducted from the invoice & posted to a separate GL account. But in My case, the WT amount should be posted to a GL Account and the amount should not be deducted from the vendor account.
    This arises in case of foreign payments

    Try following this guide for Defining Withholding Tax Formulas
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/7b/5d823ae35c3769e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    and this one Defining Withholding Tax Types and Withholding Tax Codes
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/8e/5a823a89569e68e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    This may help you!

  • With holding tax report with material and qty fields

    Dear All,
    Is there any standard report available with with holding tax data with material and qty fields.
    Thanks,
    Sekhar.

    dear Friend,
    Withholding tax will deduct on services. Hence Material and quantity is not relavent.
    There is no report is available also.
    reg
    Madhu M

  • Clearing customer Items with Special G/L Indicator 'A' (down payment)

    Hi All,
    I've to clear two items of a customer by t.code F-32:
    Both items, that I dysplays by t.code FBL5N (u20AC 20.000,00 and - 20.000,00), are with Special G/L Indicator 'A' (down payment).
    Only the first one contains a 'tax amount' equal to 4.000,00.
    When I process the open Items of the customer by t.code F-32, I expect to see the two items as follows
    20.000,00
    - 20.000,00
    Instead, SAP displays as follows
    24.000,00
    - 20.000,00
    So, I can't clear them as 24.000,00 is not equal to 20.000,00
    Could anyone tell me ho to solve?
    Thanks

    Hi Maurizio,
    first of all, thanks for your answer.
    I've checked the tax category in the G/L account master data of the special G/L
    account used for down payments (A). Tax category is equal to '+ '.
    According to this setting, I posted a customer credit memo as follow:
    Item 01; posting key 11; Customer account XXX; Amount 24.000,00
    Item 02; posting key 09; Customer account XXX; Special G/L Indicator A; Amount 20.000,00 (tax code 20%)
    Item 03; posting key 40; Debit tax account; Amount 20.000,00 (tax code 20%)
    Now I've to clear the item 02 of that credit memo. When I try to do it by t.code F-32, SAP displays the amount 24.000,00 (with tax amount) and not 20.000,00.
    Clearing that item, the system create a automatic posting for tax account of 4000,00.
    This is my issue: SAP shouldn't create this posting for tax account.
    Thank again.
    G.

  • How to caculate  with holding tax using vendor number

    Dear All,
    I need to calculate and simulate the with holding tax amount before the FI document post. input should be the vendor number fisical year and the company code and the with hoding tax base abount. plz help me to do this
    regard
    nawa

    Hello,
    For a record in BBSEG you can have multiple records in the data file which corresponds to Structure BWITH which allows more than one value for field WT_WITHCD. For ex:
    BBKPF
    Field1      Field2
    a     bb
    x     yy
    BBSEG
    Field1      Field2     Field3     
    a     bb     ccc
    x     yy     zzz
    BWITH
    Field1      Field2     Field3     WT_WITHCD     
    a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD1
    a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD2
    a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD3
    x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD7
    x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD8
    x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD9
    Hope this gives you some help to proceed further.
    Best Regards, Murugesh AS

  • With holding tax Returns

    Dear Sapgurus,
    we are using 2 different with holding tax type one is at the time of inv posting and 2nd is payment posting which is earlier, we had created tax types and tax codes we assigned in vendor master assgined to company code and automatic posting also, finally if any vendor pay advance then we calculate tds it will post to tds g/l account, after that in sap any option how to file the tds returns.
    Regards
    Veeru

    Dear,
    Once you have posted TDS then usually at the month end you will run below transaction to complete the process..
    1. Use transcation J1INCHLN (this will club all TDS posted per section and paid)
    2. Use transaction J1INBANK (when you make TDS payment in Bank then bank will give you challan number which you have to update in the system)
    3. Use transaction J1INCERT (this will print the vendor certificate (this is usually an year end practice)
    4. Use transaction J1INMIS (this will provide consolidated report for TDS)
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi

  • With holding tax code for posting while caluclation step

    Hello gurus,
    can you let me know in the configuring check boxes what i have missed out,
    while posting vendor invoice i am not able to get the tax amount and net invoice amount.
    thanks
    Pranam

    hi,
    check in your config if u have put tick mark under the tab With holding tax posting i.e posting with payment.
    this will make you to calculate and post the tax amount during payment.
    thanks
    G.Bharathi

  • Reg: Correction of Wrong  With holding tax  amount  Values Posted via BAPI

    Hello Experts,
    I have posted some invoices using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with With holding tax code and amount now the thing is that ..the document is posted successfully  with Wrong  With hoding tax amount data in TABLE WITH_ITEM due to this while executing t-code F-53 ( Outgoing payments )   its not calculating the with holding tax amount for the invoice .
    Now i wan't to correct ( Negate some values) the values in  WITH_ITEM table.....
    How am i going to do it..!
    Plz..experts help.
    Plz waiting for your input

    Dear All,
    this is not an error but the Standard System Design. Please read the note 611844. Only if You insert manually the WT amounts during the posting You will see them into the WT TAB after the posting. If You make the System to calculate the WT Aamounts automatically, no WT amounts will be reported into MIRO/MIR4. You can see them into the follow on document.
    I hope this helps.
    Mauri

Maybe you are looking for