Work Order - TECO Status Question
Dear All,
Is there a way to indicate who performed the last accounting transaction with a Work order?
For example, Who Teco'd the order and when it was Teco'd, etc..
This allows me to create a report to show productivity of how many work orders being complete.
Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Mike
Hello Michale
From PP Stand point ,if you are looking at TECO of Production order with individual person did , U can use COOIS functionality seleting Sytem Status : TECO and Give the Production Scheduler .There are lot of functionality u can use within date ranges, plant wise , material wise and u have the option to choose various lay out to generate report from COOIS.
Hope this will solve your problem.
Regards
Jia
Similar Messages
-
Work order-System status table
Hi,
In which table does the system status of the work order (TECO, Created, Released etc) gets updated? I want to know in which table does all the open work orders get updated.
Thanks in AdvanceDear Jegashree,
Check this link
[Production order status|Table : Production order status;
Regards
Madhu -
Changin work order system status via FM BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN
Hello,
I've succeeded to change work order user status via FM BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN.
Is it also possible to change the system status with the same FM?
Thanks
MosheCheck STATUS_CHANGE_INTERN_MULTI & STATUS_CHANGE_INTERN
-
Function module for changing Work order user status in IW32
Hi,
I want to change the work order user status in IW32 using ABAP.
Is there any function module to do so or any other way? I have tried using BDC but this does not work.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Naba
Edited by: n. saha on Nov 5, 2008 6:46 AMI am getting Same Problem.
fi_methods-method = 'SAVE'.
APPEND fi_methods.
fi_methods-refnumber = 1.
fi_methods-objecttype = 'USERSTATUS'.
fi_methods-method = 'CHANGE'.
fi_methods-objectkey = '002000002453'.
APPEND fi_methods.
fi_userstatus-user_st_text = 'COMM'.
fi_userstatus-user_langu = 'EN'.
fi_userstatus-CHANGE_EVENT = ' 01 '.
APPEND fi_userstatus.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN'
TABLES
it_methods = fi_methods
it_userstatus = fi_userstatus
return = fi_return.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
Above code I am using and there the message comes like
T ID NUM MESSAGE
S IW 080 Order saved with number 2000002453
S IWO_BAPI2 110 BAPI control was ended
can any on know what is wrong in this? please help if having knowledge.
Thank You,
Jahnavee Trivedi -
How to reset Work Order System Status -NCMP Not completed
Hi Friends,
Please can anyone guide me how do I reset / revert the NCMP (Not completed) System Status of the Work Order. The System Status comes after I have done the Function of "Do Not Execute".
Thanks in Advance.
AnantHi,
1. You cannot reset it back . For future cases ensure to grey out the option using Transaction Variants SHD0 for IW31/IW32 Tcodes
2.Steps to create transaction variant http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/40d1443e-0184-2c10-c68d-c612f771fe6f?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
3.You can also explore user exit :IWO10026 User check on setting status 'Do not perform'
regards
pushpa -
Unable to upload PM Work Order Header Status
Hi,
I have made LSMW for tcode: IW31. I have a requirement to upload legacy data to SAP with their existing header status.
For instance:
I have a work order which got a header status complete and I want to upload this work order with its status. So, how can I upload different work orders with their different header status.
Do let me know as soon as possible.
Thanks for the contribution.
Regards,
YahyaYes, you are right. Originally it should be the way you answered but requirement is to upload data with respect to their order status from legacy.
In addition, is there any possiblity that I can create one complete LSMW for transaction IW31 OR IW32?
This is asked because I am unable to upload data in Operatoins Tab
Thanks.
Regards,
Yahya -
Hi all
I face this peculiar problem. When I TECO a Production order there sometimes the order reservation for components are not wiped out. Why does this happen only sometimes and if this happens how do I remove the component reservation?
thanks a lotHi
Usually when you did not reach the upper or lower limits of the order, reservation ermains open.. so first otion to clean up all reservation linkedto the order is to set TECO status. if it did not clean up all reservation may be caused becuase there are open items in another screen or being handle by another user.
So you can remove the TECO, and TECO the order once again, just ensure there are no other screen using the order or material.
Next option is to delete the reservation directly via MB22. sometimes this option is not possible, normally when Reservations are created automatically by the system, in this case only deleting the source of the reservation.
Final option is to clean only the reservation for a given material, just go to the ordern in change mode, and then to the material details, and set the flag "on" for the field "Final Issue".
Hope this helps.
JC -
SET PM WOrk Order System Status to TECO
Good Afternoon SAP PLM Forum users,
Will you please tell me the best method to Technically complete (set system status to TECO) 85,000 PM orders that have system status REL and CNF or PCNF.
Thanking you in advance
LeslieHi,
You could use IW38 to select and generate a list of orders. Then from the output screen highlite a group of orders and choose the complete function.
Also BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN method TECHNICALCOMPLETE could be used with later releases.
-Paul
Thread moved to EAM forum -
Sale order TECO status maintain
Hi SAP Buddy
can any one tell me .. how the restriction can be customized in SAP for an sale order..
Condition ::
Untill unless Production order of a sale order line item ( of MTO scenerio) is not made TECO we were not able to TECO sale order line ITEM..
Thanks In advance
BVHi,
The following actions are executed if an order is set to Technically complete.
The order is not relevant for MRP planning
Reservations are deleted
Capacity requirements are deleted
Purchase requisitions for external operations or non-stock materials are deleted
The order and its operations receive the system status Technically Completed (TECO)
If an order is technically complete, you cannot change it. The fields in the order are displayed but cannot be changed. You can however cancel technical completion, for instance if order data has to be changed.
Regards,
V. Suresh -
BAPI for changing Work order user status in IW32
Hello Experts,
I am getting Same Problem in updating status via BAPI, BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN. Its not giving any error but even not update status.
I know i can use this for changing the user status also but not sure how to carry out things.
I used this code.
fi_methods-method = 'SAVE'.
APPEND fi_methods.
fi_methods-refnumber = 1.
fi_methods-objecttype = 'USERSTATUS'.
fi_methods-method = 'CHANGE'.
fi_methods-objectkey = '002000002453'.
APPEND fi_methods.
fi_userstatus-user_st_text = 'COMM'.
fi_userstatus-user_langu = 'EN'.
fi_userstatus-change_event = ' 01 '.
APPEND fi_userstatus.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN'
TABLES
it_methods = fi_methods
it_userstatus = fi_userstatus
return = fi_return.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
Above code I am using and there the message comes like
T ID NUM MESSAGE
S IW 080 Order saved with number 2000002453
S IWO_BAPI2 110 BAPI control was ended
can any on know what is wrong in this? please help if having knowledge.
Thank You,
Jahnavee TrivediI am getting Same Problem.
fi_methods-method = 'SAVE'.
APPEND fi_methods.
fi_methods-refnumber = 1.
fi_methods-objecttype = 'USERSTATUS'.
fi_methods-method = 'CHANGE'.
fi_methods-objectkey = '002000002453'.
APPEND fi_methods.
fi_userstatus-user_st_text = 'COMM'.
fi_userstatus-user_langu = 'EN'.
fi_userstatus-CHANGE_EVENT = ' 01 '.
APPEND fi_userstatus.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN'
TABLES
it_methods = fi_methods
it_userstatus = fi_userstatus
return = fi_return.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
Above code I am using and there the message comes like
T ID NUM MESSAGE
S IW 080 Order saved with number 2000002453
S IWO_BAPI2 110 BAPI control was ended
can any on know what is wrong in this? please help if having knowledge.
Thank You,
Jahnavee Trivedi -
I have used the following code to create work order but i was unable to do so
I am getting return status SUCCESS(S)....
but am unable to view the record in EAM_WORK_ORDERS_V..
any sort of help would be appreciated...
declare
g_eam_wo_relations_tbl0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_relations_tbl_type;
g_eam_wo_relations_rec eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_relations_rec_type;
g_eam_op_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_op_rec_type;
g_eam_op_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_op_rec_type;
g_eam_op_network_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_op_network_rec_type;
g_eam_op_network_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_op_network_rec_type;
g_eam_mat_req_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_mat_req_rec_type;
g_eam_mat_req_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_mat_req_rec_type;
g_eam_di_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_direct_items_rec_type;
g_eam_di_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_direct_items_rec_type;
g_eam_res_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_rec_type;
g_eam_res_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_rec_type;
g_eam_res_inst_rec0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_inst_rec_type;
g_eam_res_inst_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_inst_rec_type;
g_eam_op_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_tbl_type;
g_eam_op_tbl1 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_tbl_type;
g_eam_op_network_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_network_tbl_type;
g_eam_res_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_tbl_type;
g_eam_res_inst_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_inst_tbl_type;
g_eam_sub_res_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_sub_res_tbl_type;
g_eam_res_usage_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_usage_tbl_type;
g_eam_mat_req_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_mat_req_tbl_type;
g_eam_di_tbl0 EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_direct_items_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_wo_relations_tbl eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_relations_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_wo_rec eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_rec_type;
g_out_eam_wo_tbl eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_op_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_op_network_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_op_network_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_res_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_res_inst_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_inst_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_sub_res_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_sub_res_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_res_usage_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_res_usage_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_mat_req_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_mat_req_tbl_type;
g_out_eam_di_tbl EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.eam_direct_items_tbl_type;
g_eam_wo_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_rec_type;
g_eam_wo_rec2 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_rec_type;
g_eam_wo_tbl0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_wo_tbl_type;
g_eam_wo_res_usg_tbl0 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_usage_tbl_type;
l_return_status VARCHAR2(1);
l_msg_count NUMBER;
g_eam_wo_usg_rec1 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_usage_rec_type;
g_eam_wo_usg_rec2 eam_process_wo_pub.eam_res_usage_rec_type;
begin
g_eam_wo_rec1 := null;
g_eam_wo_rec1.transaction_type := EAM_PROCESS_WO_PVT.G_OPR_CREATE;
g_eam_wo_rec1.batch_id := 1;
G_EAM_WO_REC1.HEADER_ID := 1;
G_EAM_WO_REC1.WIP_ENTITY_ID := NULL;
g_eam_wo_rec1.wip_entity_name := '10040';
g_eam_wo_rec1.organization_id := 207;
g_eam_wo_rec1.asset_group_id := 16884;
g_eam_wo_rec1.asset_number := '28Z1933';
g_eam_wo_rec1.rebuild_item_id := null;
g_eam_wo_rec1.rebuild_serial_number := null;
G_EAM_WO_REC1.MAINTENANCE_OBJECT_SOURCE := 1;
g_eam_wo_rec1.maintenance_object_type := 3;
g_eam_wo_rec1.maintenance_object_id := 1768219;
g_eam_wo_rec1.parent_wip_entity_id := null;
g_eam_wo_rec1.manual_rebuild_flag := null;
g_eam_wo_rec1.owning_department := 4002 ;
g_eam_wo_rec1.description := 'Creating a Released Work Order';
g_eam_wo_rec1.class_code := 'MAINT';
g_eam_wo_rec1.status_type := wip_constants.released;
g_eam_wo_rec1.date_released := sysdate-100;
g_eam_wo_rec1.firm_planned_flag := 1;
g_eam_wo_rec1.scheduled_start_date := sysdate;
g_eam_wo_rec1.requested_start_date := sysdate;
g_eam_wo_rec1.scheduled_completion_date := sysdate;
g_eam_wo_rec1.material_issue_by_mo := 'N';
g_eam_wo_rec1.priority := 10;
g_eam_wo_rec1.issue_zero_cost_flag := 'Y';
g_eam_wo_rec1.po_creation_time := 1;
g_eam_wo_rec1.job_quantity := 1;
g_eam_wo_rec1.notification_required := 'N';
g_eam_wo_tbl0(1) := g_eam_wo_rec1;
EAM_PROCESS_WO_PUB.PROCESS_WO
( p_bo_identifier => 'EAM'
, p_api_version_number => 1.0
, p_init_msg_list => TRUE
, p_commit => 'Y'
, p_eam_wo_rec => g_eam_wo_rec1
, p_eam_op_tbl => g_eam_op_tbl0
, p_eam_op_network_tbl => g_eam_op_network_tbl0
, p_eam_res_tbl => g_eam_res_tbl0
, p_eam_res_inst_tbl => g_eam_res_inst_tbl0
, p_eam_sub_res_tbl => g_eam_sub_res_tbl0
, p_eam_res_usage_tbl => g_eam_res_usage_tbl0
, p_eam_mat_req_tbl => g_eam_mat_req_tbl0
, p_eam_direct_items_tbl => g_eam_di_tbl0
, x_eam_wo_rec => g_eam_wo_rec2
, x_eam_op_tbl => g_out_eam_op_tbl
, x_eam_op_network_tbl => g_out_eam_op_network_tbl
, x_eam_res_tbl => g_out_eam_res_tbl
, x_eam_res_inst_tbl => g_out_eam_res_inst_tbl
, x_eam_sub_res_tbl => g_out_eam_sub_res_tbl
, x_eam_res_usage_tbl => g_eam_res_usage_tbl0
, x_eam_mat_req_tbl => g_out_eam_mat_req_tbl
, x_eam_direct_items_tbl => g_out_eam_di_tbl
, x_return_status => l_return_status
, x_msg_count => l_msg_count
, p_debug => 'Y'
, p_output_dir => '/sqlcom/log/lv115dyp'
, p_debug_filename => 'eambo22.log'
, p_debug_file_mode => 'w'
dbms_output.put_line('work order creation status:'||l_return_status);
commit;
END;
thanks in advance
DEVYou have opened the render engine, not the full program.
Mylenium -
Print of work order before release
Hi,
Is it possible to print a work order before releasing it. What customization/changes can be done to do this ?
Regards,
VivekYou can do that using standard t-code BS22.
After calling t-code BS22 double click on system status I0001 - CRTD – Created.
Then search for, so called business transaction ‘RMDR - Print Order’ and choose function Allowed.
I have just done it in my sandbox and now I’m allowed to print shop papers for work orders in status CRTD but as per default shop papers should be printed in REL status please analyze possible impact before changing anything in BS22. -
Authorization group in Work order
Hi all,
I was doing some reading on authorization groups and found that in ECC 6.0 the transfer of authorization group is possible from the technical object to the work order.
My question: Is there an authorization group in the work order in 46C and where can I find it? I have looked through all tabs in the work order and could not find the field.
Thanks
MHi Mark
Authorization Group Means
You allocate the master record of this object to a group to which only certain users have access for processing the data. The users that have access authorization have the appropriate entry in their user master record.
It has no links to Work Order, i suppose. This AG will be responsible for the technical Objects...
If you want to check for the Work Order... u will be having fields like Person Responsible, Authorization to Particular User Etc...
I dont think there is any Connection between the two..
Can u tel us ? Why u want it in the order... If your requirement is not Standard also.. there will be any other way we can Find a Solution for your query.
- Pithan -
Different between work order closed and completed
HI experts
I would like to know what is different between closed work order and completed on SAP PM Module.
regards
nasserSee this conversation:Completed is technical comptete (TECO) - the technician has done his/her work, closed is settled and done also from an accounting perspective (settlement)
PM Work Order TECO and CLSD
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3158261 -
Problems to set TECO status in PM work orders
Hi all,
I have the next situation: I have a PM work order and its status is Released (REL). When i try to set TECO status (technnical complete), the system send me the following error: " to close order must change user status to TECO ". I am not using USER STATUS ... I just using system status ... that's the reason I dont understand the error.
Thanks for your answer.Hi,
The message sounds like a custom message. Is there any exit active that might be checking for a specific user status? Maybe customer exit IWO10004 (EXIT_SAPLCOIH_004), this is executed when orders are technically completed.
-Paul
Use Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) forum for PM/CS specific topics
Enterprise Asset Management (SAP EAM)
Maybe you are looking for
-
Is there a format for a file that I can use for attaching a one page document with photos embedded that will open in everyone's email automatically? I've tried PDF and Word, but PDF worked only in Mail. Word worked in nothing. I also tried copyin
-
I've incorporated the FailureHandlerExample into my Test Sequences (with some minor modifications) and it works ok when it is in the SequenceFilePostStepFailure in my Sequence File. However, it says in the Sequence comments that this can be made into
-
Does pages 6.0 support internal links to other pages?
I want to create links inside of Pages 6 to take the reader to other locations in the document. I need to have these fully functional links exported with the document into pdf. Has anyone actually tried this in 6.0? Des it work?
-
My iphone 4 has started deleting apps and app store won't let me redownload them!
A week or so ago, my iphone deleted a photo editing app, and as I went to redownload it, it gave me the option to open the app (which was not on my phone), but not to reinstall it. it did the same thing with a music app the next day. now it's at the
-
Understanding Azure Backup Retention
I'm not seeing the expected behavior of Azure Backup regarding retention. Since Azure Backup is charged by the amount of data stored, we intend to keep the cost as low as possible by only storing the most recent backup. That is, we expect to only pay