Workers on strike - is there a response from Verizon?

I see in the news that 45,000 Verizon employees went on strike. So, I signed on to this website hoping to find out what Verizon itself thinks. Nothing. No links in the news items, no links on the announcements. It's as if it isn't happening. As a Verizon customer, I am concerned about Verizon's treatment of its employees. I'm appalled that with the economy the way it is, Verizon would choose now to go after employee benefits. I'm even more disturbed that there is absolutely no mention of it on their website. Verizon, I thought your employees were important to you. I thought that was why you supposedly have such good customer service. From this web site: "Our employee friendly practices have earned us recognition as the employer of choice in the telecommunications industry." Is this still true? For how long?

Of course you're a union plant. Show me one of you who registered more than a week ago. Denying it is as stupid as Trublubrewcru (dig the name) saying he's not a "lefty".
The purpose of this forum is to get the best products & service for the least cost from Verizon Wireless by way of direct and publicly-aired feedback from Verizon's Wireless customers.
The people that get my sympathy are American consumers trying to stretch our inflation-shrinking dollars. Verizon overpaying union workers in not conducive to that goal.
I want Verizon to provide the best value products & service, and I HOPE they make as much money as they can doing it. I want all boats to rise in an economic tide. In a free market & country, Customers & Workers are free to leave for greener pastures.
(two-year contracts not withstanding)

Similar Messages

How do you get a RESPONSE from Verizon?

How does one get a response from Verizon? Here's my situation...
Given the amount of trouble that I have had with a recent order, you would think that I was trying to land a 747 jet on my roof. In reality, all I was aiming to do was to cancel the $19.99 per month phone service that I never used. I do not even own a phone, for that matter. I also had enhanced high speed Internet, and I wanted to retain the high speed Internet. A few days before January 13, 2012, I called Verizon and spoke to the 1st sales representative, who ensured me that it was no problem to cancel the phone service and yet retain the high speed Internet for the same monthly price. 24 hours later, my high speed DSL service was no longer functioning. I will try to briefly explain the disastrous customer service that ensued.
The first several phone calls to Verizon were not productive as I was transferred to the wrong department, and then at least one of my phone calls was dropped by the Verizon server. The representative did not call me back. I finally got in touch with a technical support representative, the 2nd Verizon representative, who informed me that the high speed Internet had been turned off and that I had to speak to a sales representative to solve the issue. Another sales representative, the 3rd Verizon representative, informed me that the 1st representative had cancelled my phone line, and thus cancelled all of my services. Great. The 3rd representative informed me that he was absolutely capable of handling the problem and that he would simply add a new order for high speed Internet, which was to be activated the next morning. The next morning came and went, and guess what? No Internet. I called again. The 4th Verizon representative told me that everything that had been done previously was incorrect and that the sales department is not capable of making such changes. She told me that she could not help me and that my claim had to be submitted to a different department, which has the authority to un-do all of the previous changes. She told me that I would receive a call back the same day to resolve the issue. Given my previous experiences with Verizon, I was confident that I would not, in fact, receive a call back and so I asked her how I could get transferred to this department, if I needed to call again. She said that I could not be transferred. Okay. So then I asked her what to ask for so that next time I called, I could be transferred to the correct department without dealing with yet another sales representative who gives me yet a different story. She informed me that she could not provide that information to customers. The Department That Shall Not Be Named (and that I cannot contact) did not call me, and I was not surprised. Unfortunately, I did not know how to go about contacting them, because, as I was told, customers aren’t allowed to do that.
The 6th phone call to Verizon was dropped by the Verizon server. The 7th phone call to Verizon went to the 5th Verizon representative, a sales associate who placed us on hold for the first 15 minutes only to inform us that she could not find any record of our Internet service. What the heck was she doing, checking her Facebook account? She finally returns, puts us on another extended hold, and then adamantly tells us that we need to speak with technical support, which, if you recall, was the first Verizon party that I spoke at the beginning of this debacle. The 5th representative transfers me again to technical support. Of course, the technical support personnel, the 6th Verizon representative said what the first one did, that the account was inactive and that we needed to talk to the sales department. My husband was on the phone at this point because I was DONE. When the 6th technical support representative tried to transfer him back to the sales department, my husband insisted that the 6th technical support representative remain on the line while we spoke to yet another sales representative, the 7th Verizon representative. The 6th technical support representative patiently waited with us while we sat in yet another long queue to speak with a member of the sales department.
The 7th sale representative, from the retention department based out of New Jersey, found that all previous orders had been set up erroneously. She cancelled the old orders and reinstated a completely new order. The DSL began working a few days later. MAGIC. She then left me a voicemail message saying that she would eliminate the activation and shipping fee (duh) as I never canceled the account to begin with and as I already had the equipment. She also applied a coupon to reduce the price to around $30 per month, assured for the next 2 years. I was relieved.
You can imagine our frustration then when we received the bill for $79 on February 6, 2012, which included a much higher monthly rate (around $45) and the shipping and activation fee of $19.99 that we were assured we would not pay. Again, nothing was shipped to us because we already had the equipment.
Our next phone call to Verizon landed us with a guy, the 8th Verizon representative, who had no intention of helping us. According to him, there was no record of these wrongs, and despite the fact that we had an old account number and three order numbers that were screwed up, he did not deem that there was enough evidence to change our monthly bill. (Unfortunately, the 7th Verizon representative did not make notes or appropriately document the situation on the new account.) The 8th Verizon representative then had the audacity to comment that we could be lying to him, yet he was unwilling to view the evidence that we could have presented. Instead, he suggested that we call tech support again and try to go through the same process to get connected to the mysterious “retention department” which he knew nothing about.
At this point, I was beyond fed up. The attitude of the 8th Verizon representative put me over the edge. I filed a complaint with the Better Business Bureau (BBB) with an abbreviated version of this story. I did not file the complaint to get back at Verizon. Instead, I filed the complaint because I knew that another phone call to Verizon would be useless. I’ve been dealing with this issue for over a month, and I’m sick of it. I have better things to do with my time, believe it or not, and this situation has resulted in a significantly waste of my time over what, in my opinion, was a very simple issue to resolve.
The BBB processed the complaint and I was contacted last Friday afternoon by a Verizon representative (the 9th) who said that she was looking into the matter and that she would respond to me within two to three business days. Well, it’s almost the end of the week, and I have received no response. Again, after all of this, how could I be surprised?
I have been a Verizon customer, wireless and residential, for as long as I can remember, but I am reaching the point of outrage. This situation is truly unacceptable.
You would think that, in 2012, with all of the technology available to us and the fact that Verizon is a COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, that at least Verizon employees would be able to make a basic change to an existing order and that at least one out of 9 Verizon representatives would be able to solve this issue in a span of over four weeks. Think again.
How does one get a response from Verizon?

dougiedc wrote:
It boggles the mind. The Verizon store on L Street downtown Washington, D.C. cannot access my Verizon account. They can only sell cellphones then it's up to me to contact Verizon on my own to get the hook up. I even asked "Are you Verizon employes? Is this a vendor store or is it really a Verizon owned and operated store?" The answer "Yes, we are Verizon employes, yes this is a Verizon owned and operated store" ...
Yes, it indeed boggles the mind. I'm of course referring to the fact that your post concerns Verizon Wireless products and services. This forum is dedicated exclusively to Verizon Communications services. As you probably know, Verizon Wireless and Verizon Communications operate as separate companies.
If you need help for a Verizon wireless product or service, it's best to direct questions to the Verizon Wireless forums. You can reach them by clicking on "Wireless" (either here or at the top of the page).
Good luck and I sincerely hope you get your issue resolved.

Poor Service Since Upgrade - Unacceptable Response From Verizon

Like many others on here, my Note 3 essentially has zero service from my home. Everything was fine until a few weeks ago when an OTA update came through. I rely on my phone as my sole source of communication from my house, office and on the go, and not being able to receive or send a phone call or text message is not only annoying, it's a safety concern for me and my family. There is obviously a pervasive issue that needs to be addressed ASAP, but instead the only responses I see from Verizon Customer Support is "have you turned your phone off?" or "what's your zip code?". Seriously? This is the first time in over ten years i'm VERY seriously considering switching carriers. I hear T-Mobile is paying Early Termination Fees.

dougiedc wrote:
It boggles the mind. The Verizon store on L Street downtown Washington, D.C. cannot access my Verizon account. They can only sell cellphones then it's up to me to contact Verizon on my own to get the hook up. I even asked "Are you Verizon employes? Is this a vendor store or is it really a Verizon owned and operated store?" The answer "Yes, we are Verizon employes, yes this is a Verizon owned and operated store" ...
Yes, it indeed boggles the mind. I'm of course referring to the fact that your post concerns Verizon Wireless products and services. This forum is dedicated exclusively to Verizon Communications services. As you probably know, Verizon Wireless and Verizon Communications operate as separate companies.
If you need help for a Verizon wireless product or service, it's best to direct questions to the Verizon Wireless forums. You can reach them by clicking on "Wireless" (either here or at the top of the page).
Good luck and I sincerely hope you get your issue resolved.

Response from Verizon about lack of Lumia device support

I am wanting to know what the exact problem is with issuing Lumia updates from this carrier. As of today in the United States the only carrier that has to issue an update to Cyan for Lumia devices is Verizon. We have the Denim update coming to Lumia devices here soon. Then there is the confirmation that next year when Windows 10 premieres devices that are running Windows 8.1 will be able to update but Denim, and subsequently Cyan updates, will be required to perform this update. Honestly I am very displeased with this support and this lack of ability to get the update out, whoever might be involved in that, but seeing as every other carrier in the United States has the update available then there has to be something that Verizon is making difficult in deployment. Seeing as really this should not be Verizon's decision as to when this update is delivered originally, because it is not like a computer's updates is dictated by an ISP, this is something that really is rubbing my fur the wrong way. Thus I would like to open yet another discussion thread on this issue and see if Verizon will give any additional details as to why they are the last service provider to update their old devices considering that they also have the smallest line of products from now Microsoft, they have reduced that line of product recently and they have yet to make any official comment on the issue or if we will ever see the device. I am very patient but 6 months to get an update is a little ridiculous.

Verizon does not care about Windows Phone Users! It is very obvious. Why did they pull the Icon? Why did they not start testing the Cyan update in a timely manner? Why do they not respond? THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT WINDOWS PHONE USERS!

Any Help or Response from Verizon or HTC Regarding Problematic Update For OG Droid Incredible??

Dear Verizon,
Are you or HTC doing anything to resolve the problematic update that has effected most customers using the Original HTC Droid Incredible that was recently updated to 4.08.605.15? These problems include continual rebooting, freezing, and the necessity of repeated battery pulls in order to resume normal functioning. There have been a number of threads on the various problems, the following is just one of them.
https://community.verizonwireless.com/thread/775916
Can someone please respond to show us that that you are at least aware of the problem? And please no recommendations on factory resets as this has not solved a majority of the problems. Thank you.

pre86 - this was the response i just recieved:
Luckily, HTC has sent out a technical bulletin regarding this particular
issue. They're aware that the update will cause their devices to reboot quite a
few times, and they've said that it was actually something they had planned.
They've informed us that you'll experience this issue with the reboot for one
day but no more than two days maximum. I'm sorry because I know that it's not
what you were wanting to hear, but HTC is guarantying that you shouldn't have
this issue two days after the system update. No need to worry, it's not a phone
issue and your devices don't need to be replaced.
We'll see if this holds true......

When will we see a response from Verizon on their deception about our Galaxy Non Nexus

I read the article and it said Verizon was going to give a response. We all know this response will never come it never has. I will be sure to let them know of my displeasure when I move my 3 lines of service to a prepaid carrier. With a real nexus phone directly from Google. What pitiful customer service we are receiving.

You're not going to get one here since this is a customers to customer forum. Secondly if you are going to go to another carrier just do it and cut the drama. Beside what the heck are you even talking about?

Response from Verizon support Regarding Portico

This was posted in a different forum by another poster. Since most of you are curious to know, I figured I would post it here for you guys
>As the email is proprietary property of VZW and we can not verify if the email has been edited after receipt before posting on the forum, the email transcript is deleted<
Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator

Verizon does not care about Windows Phone Users! It is very obvious. Why did they pull the Icon? Why did they not start testing the Cyan update in a timely manner? Why do they not respond? THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT WINDOWS PHONE USERS!

Response from Apple ?

Is there any response from apple regarding the new ibrick 4.0 update?
Would really like to know what, if anything they are planning to do.

I highly doubt the error rate is anywhere near 30%
There's nearly 100 million iPhone OS devices sold. Let's go conservative and say 5% of those are being updated, so 5 million updates. It's probably higher, but we'll go with that.
30% would would be 1.5 million bricked iPhones. Trust me, that would be big news. Apple would be even more slammed than they are and it'd be in USA Today, New York Times, etc. Kind of like how the pre-order overload was, when 600,000 preorders were taken in a day, and probably at least one million people tried.
Now, a more realistic, but still high failure rate is about 1%, which would be about 50,000 failed updates. I could buy that number, although it's probably still a bit higher than the true rate of failure, but it's at least in the right order of magnitude.
You're getting some heavy sample bias by looking at the Apple support forum. No company will ever get this process to be 100% failproof. Over millions of devices (with varying computers to back them and app/data configurations), there's no way to test all the possible permutations. Especially on a release to old hardware that's not getting the primary focus of Apple's attention.
I agree... Apple should've done this release better than they did, but let's not get ahead of ourselves and think this is a catastrophic meltdown, unless there's really numbers and proof to back up that bold of a claim.
This is fairly regular upgrade hiccups, probably slightly worse than Apple would've modeled internally, but not excessively so. On top of that, Apple will care a lot more about the 3GS upgrades over the 3G upgrades. There just aren't enough 3G units still under AppleCare to warrant the extra concern.

Is there a way to remove old responses from the Acrobat Tracker?

Is there a way to remove old responses from the Tracker if I have deleted the original sources? In other words, Acrobat.com and my desktop are out of sync.How I can get rid of any of these files.

nvm. I found it.

"This message may not have been delivered to User Name because there was no response from the server." in IM chat

Hello All,
Sometime users are getting below error message on the IM windows when they having P2P IM Chat.
"This message may not have been delivered to User Name because there
was no response from the server."
I can see below error on the Lync 2013 Monitoring page.

Hi,
Please make sure all required ports have been allowed. You can verify that all ports are open can accepting connections using telnet.
Telnet from External Client:
Test to SIP.domain.com 443/SIP
Test to WebConf.domain.com 443/PSOM
Test to AV.domain.com 443/STUN
Telnet from Lync 2013 Edge:
Telnet to Pool.domain.com 5061/SIP
Telnet from Lync 2013 Pool:
Telnet to LyncEdge.domain.com 5061
Telnet to LyncEdge.domain.com 443
Telnet to LyncEdge.domain.com 5062
Telnet to LyncEdge.domain.com 4443
Telnet to LyncEdge.domain.com 8057
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

How to decrease timeout value when there is no response from BOE server?

We are using BOE XI R2 .NET SDK to logon BOE XI R2 Server as below as well as using Infoview/CMC logon BOE:
set boSessionManager = Server.CreateObject("CrystalEnterprise.SessionMgr")
set boEnterpriseSession = boSessionManager.Logon(boUserID, boPassword, boCMS, boAuthType)
There is no response for long time from BOE server after I excuting log on BOE using .NET SDK or Infoview/CMC App for more than one minute.
So I want to timeout the logon atction after a certain time such as one minute if there is no response from BOE server.
My question comes:
1. What is the default timeout value for this operation?
    Where can I find it and how to modify it?
2. I found ther are some registry keys on .NET APP Server:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Business Objects\Suite 12.0\Report Application Server\InprocServer\EnterpriseRequestTimeout
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Business Objects\Suite 12.0\Report Application Server\Client SDK\CorbaAdapter\WaitReplyTimeout
Are they for the action timeout I mentioned above? If not, what do they work for?
It seems that WaitReplyTimeout is for report data retrieval timeout according to Kbase article 1199286 and which registry setting to change for long running reports, is it correct?
Thanks for any response.
Thanks,
Sunny

I don't think there is a setting available for this. The timeouts you are looking at are essentially how long to wait for a report to process.
My concern about trying to find a setting like this is that if you do get the client (aka SDK) to timeout after one minute, the CMS may still recieve this request shortly after and logon, creating a session that no longer has a handle to it and will then have to wait for it to timeout because of inactivity which would tie up a license.

ADE keeps quitting when trying to copy epub book to e-reader. Never had the problem before. On OS X Yosemite v.10.10.2. Worked fine a few weeks ago. Is there a fix? I see others have asked about the same problem with no response from Adobe. Please h

Has anyone received a response from Adobe about this issue?

Has anyone received a response from Adobe about this issue?

Discoverer Portlet Provider, No Response from Application Web Server

I must have some odd configurable incorrect. I hope one of you can help me out and point me in the right direction.
My issue involves the "Discoverer List of Worksheets" portlet. It will display all the workbooks and I can drill in and see the worksheets, but, when I click/choose a worksheet, it will return within a couple seconds and display "No Response from Application Web Server" in bold red letters, then "There was no response from application ...", then "Please notify the site's webmaster ...". I have spent the day trying to lock down a log on the http server, j2ee, web cache and used enterprise manager to see logs which changed immediately after the error but didn't seem to find much.
What am I missing? Is there a timeout somewhere? Does it look like I missed something when I configured anything?
Below are the configurables and answers to some of the obvious questions.
Thanks,
BC
Windows 2003 sp1
App Server 10.1.2.2.0
Discoverer 10.1.2.54.25
ssl -> no
sso -> yes
provider registration:
http ://luke.xxx.com/discoverer/portletprovider (actual does not have a space after "http")
"cookie domain" not checked
"user has the same identity ..."
user/session --> "once per user session"
from web cache log:
10.2.2.226 - - [18/Jul/2007:18:17:33 -0700] "GET /discoverer/portletprovider/viewer?event=openWorksheetForPortal&vw_allowsaving=false&vw_sam
ewindow=false&vw_wspath=WS_INVOICE_DETAIL%2F157&vw_connkey=cf_a101&vw_portletid=0&vw_instanceid=152576_DEFAULT_LIST_OF_WORKSHEETS_PORTLET_NA
ME_241292&vw_partitionid=241292&&vw_return_url=eNrLKC ... 4hUQ%3D%3D HTTP/1.1" 302 1909 "6959909483946,0"
10.2.2.226 - - [18/Jul/2007:18:17:37 -0700] "GET /osso_login_success?urlc=v1.4~534 ... 774851DD HTTP/1.1" 503 40
2 "6959909483946,0"
from middle tier http server log:
10.2.2.226 - - [18/Jul/2007:18:17:33 -0700] "GET /discoverer/portletprovider/viewer?event=openWorksheetForPortal&vw_allowsaving=false&vw_sam
ewindow=false&vw_wspath=WS_INVOICE_DETAIL%2F157&vw_connkey=cf_a101&vw_portletid=0&vw_instanceid=152576_DEFAULT_LIST_OF_WORKSHEETS_PORTLET_NA
ME_241292&vw_partitionid=241292&&vw_return_url=eNrLKCk ... a4hUQ%3D%3D HTTP/1.1" 302 1921
from infrastructure http server log:
10.2.2.226 - - [18/Jul/2007:18:17:33 -0700] "GET /pls/orasso/orasso.wwsso_app_admin.ls_login?Site2pstoreToken=v1.4~BFE8 ... HTTP/1.1" 302 4998
url being passed from provider:
http ://luke.xxx.com/discoverer/portletprovider/viewer?event=openWorksheetForPortal&vw_allowsaving=false&vw_samewindow=false&vw_wspath=WS_INVOICE_DETAIL%2F1048&vw_connkey=cf_a101&vw_portletid=0&vw_instanceid=152576_DEFAULT_LIST_OF_WORKSHEETS_PORTLET_NAME_241292&vw_partitionid=241292&&vw_return_url=eNr ... 1z9AEA6Dsegw%3D%3D
url that returns:
http ://luke.xxx.com/osso_login_success?urlc=v1.4~0C549F ... 3E94
the rest should be obvious:
Processes in Instance: rc_luke_mt1_instance.luke.xxx.com
------------------------------------------------+---------
ias-component | process-type | pid | status
------------------------------------------------+---------
LogLoader | logloaderd | N/A | Down
dcm-daemon | dcm-daemon | 5352 | Alive
OC4J | home | 2764 | Alive
OC4J | OC4J_Portal | 2452 | Alive
OC4J | OC4J_BI_Forms | 3644 | Alive
WebCache | WebCache | 5372 | Alive
WebCache | WebCacheAdmin | 2608 | Alive
HTTP_Server | HTTP_Server | 5204 | Alive
Discoverer | ServicesStatus | 5860 | Alive
Discoverer | PreferenceServer | 5580 | Alive
wireless | performance_server | 5216 | Alive
wireless | messaging_server | 4872 | Alive
wireless | OC4J_Wireless | 6116 | Alive
DSA | DSA | N/A | Down
Processes in Instance: rc_luke_infra1_instance.luke.xxx.com
------------------------------------------------+---------
ias-component | process-type | pid | status
------------------------------------------------+---------
LogLoader | logloaderd | N/A | Down
dcm-daemon | dcm-daemon | 2768 | Alive
OC4J | oca | 2312 | Alive
OC4J | OC4J_SECURITY | 5348 | Alive
HTTP_Server | HTTP_Server | 3036 | Alive
DSA | DSA | N/A | Down
OID | OID | 2492 | Alive
Congratulations! You have successfully reached your Provider's Test Page.
Recognizing Portlets...
default_gauges_portlet_name
default_worksheet_portlet_name
default_list_of_worksheets_portlet_name
Recognizing initialization parameters...
oracle.portal.log.LogLevel : 7
Recognizing component versions...
ptlshare.jar version: 10.1.2.0.2
pdkjava.jar version: 10.1.2.0.0

hi,
i also got the same error on my IE when i want to run VPE Workbench 5.6
the error :
No Response from Application Web Server
There was no response from the application web server for the page you requested.
Please notify the site's webmaster and try your request again later.
The error came up after i update the windows server (restart server), before that everything is running fine and ok.
I dont know where the problem is. Is it because the update? or Application Server?
I try to login to WEB CACHE MANAGER with the user/password default, but i still cant login.

No Response from Application Web Server - j2ee when running a long report

Using Oracle Application server, 10.1.2 and a j2ee application which uses Oracle Reports to create pdf report output.
When a report takes 5 mins or more to be produced, the following error message occurs, ending the session. The report request however does continue to run, and the pdf is eventually
produced on the server, but the user cannot retrieve it. So I know the report server is still going after getting this error:
No Response from Application Web Server
There was no response from the application web server for the page you requested.
Please notify the site's webmaster and try your request again later.
I'm assuming this is a timeout setting in a configuration file, but where?
Thx,
Tim

Hi Tim,
Take Backup of httpd.conf from Oracle_home2(midtier)
Now Edit httpd.conf, set timeout 1200 ie 20 mins (this depends on you how much time u need to set Note: Values are in seconds)
Now restart entire Mid tier
Then run the report again.
Regards
Fabian

Server 2012 R2 - No response from the UmRdpService service and more...

Hi!
We have a Remote Desktop Services Deployment with the following:
LIC01 – Windows 2012 R2 - Licensing
RDCB01 – Windows 2012 – Connection Broker
RDWA02 – Windows 2012 R2 – Web Access
RDG01 – Windows 2012 R2 - Gateway
RDG02 – Windows 2012 R2 - Gateway
RDG03 – Windows 2012 R2 – Gateway
RDSH01 – Windows 2012 R2 - Session Host
RDSH02 – Windows 2012 - Session Host
RDSH03 – Windows 2012 R2 - Session Host
RDSH04 – Windows 2012 R2 - Session Host
RDSH05 – Windows 2012 R2 - Session Host
RDSH06 – Windows 2012 R2 - Session Host
RDSH07 – Windows 2012 R2 - Session Host
RDSH08 – Windows 2012 R2 - Session Host
RDSH09 – Windows 2012 R2 - Session Host
RDSH10 – Windows 2012 R2 - Session Host
We have two Session Collections:
Office-R2 (All Server 2012 R2 RDSHs)
"Office (RDSH02, Closed for users)"
User Profile Disk are enabled to a SOFS Share (Server 2012).
Client Settings: Everything except "Plug and play Devices" are enabled
Problem:
Suddenly, one or more of RDSH
servers (in the Office-R2 Collection) get the following error:
A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the UmRdpService service.
After this, we get similar error messages
to other services, such as:
AudioEndpointBuilder, NcbService, ScDeviceEnum, WPDBusEnum, Netman
Users logged into the server, looses Redirection
services as local drives and local
printers, and they also have problem signing out of the server. (Hangs on signing out)
New Users that tries to sign in to that server are also having trouble (Hangs on signing in).
After using the logoff tool to sign out every user on that server, I end up With the following:
It
appears that there are no users logged on,
yet there are many Disconnected sessions...
Looking at the SOFS file share I still see that RDSH04 has read/Write to the .VHDX file that hold the User Profile.. And If the user try to log on to another server in that Collection, it get a temporary profile.
If I kill the Conncetion to the VHDX files, Users can then sign in normally to another node it that Collection.
Trying to restart the server With "Shutdown -r -t 0 -f" does not work, It just hangs on Shutdown (waited 3 days), so All I can do is Press and Hold.We
have also seen BSoD on these nodes, but I'm sure if they are related to this error:
WinDBG is saying:
BugCheck 3B, {c0000005, fffff803538fa84e, ffffd0002711cb00, 0}
Probably caused by : dfsc.sys ( dfsc!DfscCacheStore+6f )
I found https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2925981 and
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2525246, but they are not for Windows Server 2012 R2.
Any Idea?
Thanks
Anders

Hi,
Firstly, dfsc.sys indicates the DFS clients. It means that your systems use DFS service to access the file share.
Please let us know if you configured the DFS service on your file server.
Also, what is the format of file path you configured for UPD?
\\FileServer\FileShare
Or
\\Domain.com\DFS NameSpace\File Share
Thanks.
Jeremy Wu
TechNet Community Support

Workers on strike - is there a response from Verizon?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for