Wrong assignment field (ZUORN) using transaction MR08

Hi all,
On SAP R/3 4.6b we run transaction MR01 with unplanned delivery costs. As we have some price differences, the FI document has a line with the right price diff. G/L account. This G/L account has its sort key field (ZUAWA) filled with code '013' (Material Number), so the assignment field (BSEG-ZUONR) of this price differences item on the FI document, is filled with the corresponding material number (BSEG-MATNR).
The oustanding point is, when we cancel this document using MR08 this assignment field is filled with the SAP standard sort key code '014' (P.O number + P.O item // BSEG-EBELN+BSEG-EBELP). This is the sort key belonging to the GR/IR G/L account of the FI document. Thus, we have a credit note with a different text on assignment field than the original invoce (only for the price diff. acount line) !!!
We have check taht this not occurs if the invoice have not any unplanned delivery costs.
We do not use either substitutions or user-exits for feeding the assignment field.
Could you please give me a hint?
Regards.

Hello Larry,
if it is a transport issue you may find further information about how to transport screen variants in the system.
transaction SHD0
i-icon for online documentation opens a page where you get further information on how to transport screen variants.
How that this may help.
Regards, Franz

Similar Messages

Wrong assignment field (ZUORN) running MR08

Hi all,
On SAP R/3 4.6b we run transaction MR01 with unplanned delivery costs. As we have some price differences, the FI document has a line with the right price diff. G/L account. This G/L account has its sort key field (ZUAWA) filled with code '013' (Material Number), so the assignment field (BSEG-ZUONR) of this price differences item on the FI document, is filled with the corresponding material number (BSEG-MATNR).
The oustanding point is, when we cancel this document using MR08 this assignment field is filled with the SAP standard sort key code '014' (P.O number + P.O item // BSEG-EBELN+BSEG-EBELP). This is the sort key belonging to the GR/IR G/L account of the FI document. Thus, we have a credit note with a different text on assignment field than the original invoce (only for the price diff. acount line) !!!
We have check taht this not occurs if the invoice have not any unplanned delivery costs.
We do not use either substitutions or user-exits for feeding the assignment field.
Could you please give me a hint?
Regards.

I do not think you can reverse this. Once "Reference" is updated it cannot be changed, unlike line items "Assignment"
If you want to hide, the only option is to copy this program and make changes accordingly.
As far as defaulting "Assignment" is concerned, you better create a selection variant. Ask the user to select this variant at the time of execution.

Blank value in "Assignment" field in FBL3N transaction output

Hi experts,
When i exeucted FBL3N transaction, the assigment field gets displayed as blank in the output screen.
I have given input for GL Account, Company code and Posting date in FBL3N transaction input screen and executed. Iin the output, the "Assignment" field (field ZUONR) gets displayed with empty value.
recently the system is upgraded from 4.6C to ECC 6.0. When we checked in our 4.6C system, this FBL3N transaction displays value for Assignment field. But when we checked in ECC 6.0, this "Assignment" field gets displayed with blank value.
Could anyone suggest the reason why the Assigment gets displayed with blank value..
Is any OSS note to implemented for solving this issue?. If so, pls share the Note details..
regards,
Shanthi

Hi,
Yes, there is a SAP note. Check SAP note # 322910.
You should have posted it in FI forums.
Hope this helps.

Fill up of Assignment field in MIRO transaction

Hi Gurus,
I have a requirement like this:
In Transaction MIRO, the assignment field at the header level (In tab "DETAILS") is correct when posting a credit note. So after the document gets deducted with invoice, the value in the Assignment field is changing with the assignment value from the invoice by which it was credited.
So can you please help me out that what exactly is the configurational settings needs to be maintained to populate the value of this assignment field at the header level.
Regards,
Santosh.

Hi,
In Financial accounting every GL account will have one field called sort varient in its company code data.
In tcode FS00,,enter your vendor recon GL account,,Comp Code and press change button
Go to Control date tab, under account management in CC, SORT KEY .
These keys can be created with tcode OB16. and these keys will have specific fields of accounting data tables, and those will be automatically filled up to the concerned line items during accounting entry.
But this is at line item level only. For MIRo header assignment field to be entered manually.
Thanks,
Srinu

How to increase the size of u0091Allocation fieldu0092 (Assignment field)?

I tried to increase No.chars of domain ZUONR (domain for Assignment field) to 40. Its now OK for manual entering of Assignment field in FB60 / FB70, for example.
However, when defining sort key, error message still appears, saying that only 18 characters are allowed.
I'm not sure why it says so. Is there any step to do?
Can someone pls guide...
Thank you very much

The Assignment field is used in most key Finance tables and therefore changing the core field is not recommended.
If you do need to have a 40 character field I would suggest adding a new one rather than changing a SAP standard one.
Have you looked at the text field? SGTXT.

Cheque no. to be copied to assignment field of payment doc.

Hi All
I need to copy the cheque no. issued for payment to the assignment field of payment doc. so that at the time of running BRS the field matches and also we do not have to enter the no. manually .
I tried FCHU for this but on entering cocd , bank and selecting assignment check box the following error is coming :
No check which could be assigned to a document was found
Message no. FS321
Please advice what is missing

Hi Sweta,
That is practical problem u have faced, actually what I think yes u have created check but by mistake if that FCHU had been executed then wrongly assignment field is filled with blank and then automatic linkup with chick no is not possible. In that case u have to do manually.
Thanks n Regards
Prakash
SAP FI certified, ACWA

Assignment Field on the Outgoing Payment through transaction code FF.5

Hi,
The transaction code FF.5 to upload the bank statement and automatic postings. Currently the Assignment field of the line items get the value by way of combination of ID, Serial Number and Currency. The requirement is to change the derivation of the Assignment field to that of Value Date.
Can anybody help me in this regard.
Thanks&Regards,
Sreeharsha Singuru

Hi
Chage the Sort Key for Bank GL Accounts is GL Master to 001 ie. Posting Date
Assign points if useful,
Regards,
Raj

How 'Assignment' is updated using VL02N transaction ?

Hi Experts,
I want to know how and where in the program SAPMV50A, the 'assignment' field is updated when I post a GI document using VL02N transaction.
The filed for assignment is ZUONR of BSEG table. I want to know how the ZUONR field is updated while VL02N transaction is used to post a GI document.
Please help me asap.
Thanks & regards
Sanglap Ghosh
Edited by: sanglap_ghosh581 on Mar 10, 2010 10:18 AM
Edited by: sanglap_ghosh581 on Mar 10, 2010 10:20 AM

Did you find a solution for this? I have the same requirement.

Use of certain fields in CO11N transaction

Hi experts,
I want to know the purpose and utility of the following fields in the CO11N transaction.
Break time
Split
Start date and Finish date
Start time and Finish time
Does the entry made in these fields have any impact on scheduling, capacity planning etc.
Regards,
Sridharan M

Hi,
This is just for the reference it does not impact anything.
Always plan time will be used for impact for things like Scheduling,activity calculation etc.
Generally these fields are used just for reporting purpose.
Regards,
Vishal

Use of partner assignement fields

Hi,
I would like to know the 'real' use of partner assignment fields. For instance, we could focus on the 'partner segment' field (the field segment is used as recommended in the standard: the segment is both the SAP field and the IFRS notion of business segment):
Use 1) the partner fields are storing the information of the trading parner : the 'partner segment' is the 'segment' of the 'trading partner'. This is useful when doing preconsolidation routines such as intercompany reconciliation : we reconcile data from company A Segment X with trading partner B partner segment Y
Use 2) the partner fields are storing the historical value of the allocated fields: e.g. when segment 99_TBD is allocated to segment 01, the partner segment field is used to store on line item the relationship between segment 99_TBD and segment 01.
This is useful to track the origin of the data flow for allocations (and for clearing account in document splitting)
Thank you for helping me!
Bernard
Edited by: Bernard Frédéric on Oct 2, 2009 3:28 PM

Business example
Those 2 uses of partner fields are not conciliable : here is a example that shows this inconsistency :
I have a relationship between two companies. On one company, the segment has to be allocated. I have to reconcile data by company code and segment.
Here is the posting in the company where its segment has to be allocated (from 99_TBD to 01):
Company A / Segment 99_TBD / Trading partner B / Partner segment 06 100
I would like to allocate segment 99_TBD to segment 01, so I would expect the following intercompany posting:
Company A / Segment 99_TBD / Trading partner B / Partner segment 06 (100)
Company A / Segment 01         / Trading partner B / Partner segment 06    100
=> Thus, the intercompany positions are:
Company A / Segment 01         / Trading partner B / Partner segment 06    100
This is the result I expected
But when running the allocation cycle, the following is the posted:
Company A / Segment 99_TBD / Trading partner B / Partner segment 01            (100)
Company A / Segment 01         / Trading partner B / Partner segment 99_TBD     100
=> Thus, the intercompany positions are:
Company A / Segment 99_TBD / Trading partner B / Partner segment 06             100
Company A / Segment 99_TBD / Trading partner B / Partner segment 01            (100)
Company A / Segment 01         / Trading partner B / Partner segment 99_TBD     100
This not what is expected: the allocation of company A should have no impact on the segment of company B
Can you help me understand this? How the field partner segment should be used?
Thanks

Sub:ztable fields are used by what are all transactions

Hi Experts,
I am having 2 table fields. These two fields are used in 2 different Ztables. Just i want to modify these two Zfields. But i want to tell our endusers, If i am making changes on these two fields means What are all the Transaction codes will affect? I can take what are all programs used by these 2 different fields through where-used-list option. But user dont need to know the program names know? They are familiar with only transaction codes.
So anyother option is there to find out the transaction codes?
Thanks,
Sankar M

hi
good
your query is bit confusing,if you r going to change anything in the zfields than there must be a requirement for that from your end user,apart from that if you r doing any changes than you must know what r the reports going to affect after that,than you need to change them accordingly,i dont think there is any table which ll give you idea that what r the tcoded going to affect after that,bcz its a table that would have been used in different reports in different scenarios,and you have to chage all those reports accordingly.
thanks
mrutyun^

Using Assignment field or Segment field for adding product information

Hello people,
My costumer is using the new general ledger and wants too be able too add product information too FI postings. They have put their focus on using either the assignment field or the segment field (other options are not a possibility). Using the segment field will make profibility analysis easier because of existing reports. However, Iu2019ve heard of performance issues when the amount of segments used increases too say 50 or more. Does anyone have any experience with either 1 of these situations and or some good advice?
Many thanks,
Kees

As you have mentioned, reflection error mostly occurs when there is a object type mismatch.
If it is of type object reference then try
newMember.getFieldMetadata("VENDOR_REF").set(newMember,vendorBean.getObjectReference());
Further, check if the vendor object enclosed in the collection member "newMember" and the vendor object "vendorBean" are of the same type.
regards,
Immanuel

Extending field catalog of application ME using transaction NACE

Hello,
I extended the field catalog of application ME using Transaction NACE. I inserted material field as ZZMATNR but I couldn't find this field at IMG->Materials Management->Inventory Management and Physical Inventory->Output Determination->Maintain Condition Tables->Output: Create Conditions Table ->FieldCatalog.
How can I use ZZMATNR?
Thank you.
Yasar Unalp

Follow the OSS note below (OSS note - 39462) you need to follow the same for your field.
Summary
Symptom
In the message determination for purchasing, the field catalog in Transaction M/60 should be enhanced, for example, with a field for the user ID.
Other terms
USNAM, condition table
Reason and Prerequisites
The communication structure to be maintained can be taken from table T681Z. Table T681Z can be displayed with Transaction SE16.Use 'B' for message determination and application EF for purchase order.
Thus the structure for purchase orders to be maintained is KOMKBEA.
The following section describes how to include field 'User ID' in the structure.If other applications or fields are used, the following example can be used in a modified form.
Solution
1. You must include field ZZUSNAM in communication structure KOMKBEA.In this structure there is an include that is provided for additional fields.In this Include KOMKBZ you must include the field with the name ZZUSNAM. ERNAM can be used as the domain in this case.
2. The same field must also be included in structure KOMB in Include KOMBZ (the same procedure as under point 1).
3. In table T681F use Transaction SM31 with key B, EF to add the same field. You can do this by overwriting an existing field.
As of Release 4. 0 you can use view V_T681F in Transaction SM30 for that purpose. Enter usage 'B', your application and field group '001'.
4. In the message determination, the system runs perform USEREXIT_KOMKBEA_FILL. This perform is in program RVCOMFZZ.
The source code should be changed as follows:
FORM_USEREXIT_KOMKBEA_FILL.
COM_KBEA-ZZUSNAM = SY-UNAME.

Customer no to populate the Assignment field for Sales A/c using sort key

Dear All,
In 6.0, I am trying to get the Customer number to populate the Assignment field for Sales Account
We have set the sales account to a 031 sort key - sort by customer, in FS00. When 031 is set, SAP goes to the BSEG table and looks at the KUNNR (customer) field and populates the Assignment field with what is in the KUNNR field of BSEG.
The problem is: the customer number (KUNNR) does not contain any data in BSEG.
The KUNNR field of all the other account lines for the document number are blank.
Is it possible to bring the field in the General Ledger display?
Does anyone know of a user exit or other solution?
Thanks,
Gov

Hi,
Check with SD consultant and use Copy control.

User Exit to Change 'Assignment Field' while uploading Bank statement using FF_5

Hi Experts,
We are uploading bank statement using tcode FF_5. It creates BDC of FB01. then we process it via SM35. Its a country specific bank statement (Hungary). Now while processing BDC we found that document header text (BKTXT) and Assignment (ZUONR) field is filled with the combination of two keys of table FEBEP.
Screen shot of BDC
Screen having document header text:
Next Screen having Assignment
These both fields are the combination of FEBEP-KUKEY -Short key (surrogate) and FEBEP-ESNUM -Memo record number (line item number in bank statement).
Both fields are getting filled inside the standard program RFEBBU00 (This program creates BDC)
Now user wants 'posting date' in the Assignment field. Functional has changed the configuration so while doing manually via FB01 , posting date gets populated in Assignment field but While uploading via FF_5 this standard report gets called and it populates the key combination.
I am working on SAP 4.7 .
Is these any user exit or sap note for this info.
Please help me. if anyone has any idea that would be helpful.
Regards,
Ashish

Ashish, Try to find some BTE for your requirement. Use FM BTE_FUNCTION_FIND .
OPEN_FI_PERFORM_00001120_P
OPEN_FI_PERFORM_00001120_E

Wrong assignment field (ZUORN) using transaction MR08

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for