Wrong calculation of Tax in miro

Hi Experts,
While positing MIRO i am facing the following error.
The issue now is i maintained a Tax code in FTXP with 10% in IN:A/P LST and tick the Tax calculator in MIRO the tax is calculated with 30%.
Eg: Invoice amount is 10000 for which tax is 10% then tax amount should be 1000 but it displaying as 3000.
Inputs please.
Regards,
Nani.

hi,
plz check in FV12, what is the record maintained there.
regards
jash
Edited by: diptasya jash on Apr 30, 2009 9:25 AM

Similar Messages

  • Prob. in Implement User Exit for wrong calculation of Surcharge during MIRO

    Dear All,
    In our system the calculation of Surcharge is wrong during MIRO.
    So i write this issue to the SAP, the below solution is provided by them :
    Use the user exit 'J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV' to redetermine
    the additional VAT condition type value. This user exit will be
    called after the FM 'J_1I4A_TAX_CONDITIONS', where the
    redetermination of the VAT will take place on the basis of
    the changed excise duties.
    So, userexit can be implemented by CMOD and SMOD, but this userexit actually a Function Module.
    But now the problem is how can i implement the 'J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV' function Module.
    Regards,
    Nitin Garg

    Dear,
    Thanks. I already make a enhacement in this function Module and write the below code:
    ENHANCEMENT 1  ZMIRO.    "active version
    DATA : WA_XKOMV TYPE KOMV.
    DATA : WA_KBETR TYPE KOMV-KBETR,
           IDX TYPE SY-TABIX.
    LOOP AT XKOMV WHERE KSCHL = 'ZSUR'.
      IDX = SY-TABIX.
      WA_KBETR = XKOMV-KBETR / 10.
      READ TABLE XKOMV INTO WA_XKOMV WITH KEY KSCHL = 'JVRD'.
      XKOMV-KWERT = WA_XKOMV-KWERT * WA_KBETR / 100.
      MODIFY XKOMV INDEX IDX TRANSPORTING KWERT.
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDENHANCEMENT.
    ZSUR is a custom surcharge condition type. But still surcharge is wrong calculated.
    Nitin Garg.

  • Wrong calculation of tax

    Hii
    The total tax is coming wrong and same is reflected in the pricing.Infact the calculation is proper but the total tax the system is picking is wrong.The system is calculating extra 100 rs.I dont know from where it is picking this 100 rs extra.Infact total tax=excise duties-discount.The system is calculating properly but the total tax is reflected wrongly in pricing procedure.This problem has to be addressed immediately.Can anybody help me out.
    Regards
    subhash kulkarni

    dear indranil
    Suppose my base value is 100 rs .total excise duties(BEDAED) - discount on taxes = total PO taxes. for e.g  500 rs (total excise duties base value)) - 100 (discount on taxes) = 400 rs (Taxes on PO). The system is calculating properly the calculation but on the header level the system is adding extra 100 rs for all tax codes i.e Net = 100 rs and Tax = 500 rs instead of 400 rs(Taxes on PO) and same amount is reflected in pricing for JEXS (Total PO value) = 500 rs instead of 400 rs which is wrong.The value of JEXS (Total PO value) must be 400 rs. I hope u get me what i m trying to explain.
    Regards
    subhash kulkarni

  • Wrong Calculation of Tax Amount

    Hi to All,
    While making Down Payment Request (F-47) with reference capital PO, system is showing a warning message as below:
    Tax entered incorrect (code FU, amount      45,766.25), correct      36,882.24 INR
    Message no. FF707
    Diagnosis
    The system checks the tax amounts for each code on document level. However, the amounts entered deviate more from the amount calculated (using the percentage rates defined in the tax code) than is allowed considering rounding errors.
    Procedure
    If this message is a warning message, you can confirm that your entry is correct by pressing "Continue".
    If this message is an error message, you should correct the tax amounts or the base amounts, depending on how your tax code is defined.
    For more clarity: whatever the tax code is in PO same tax code giving in F-47. But in both scenarios system calculating differently.
    what could be the reason? Please guide me?
    Regards,
    Schilukuri

    Hi SDNer,
    Thanks for your reply.
    As you said, In PO system does not calculate tax based on the tax code,it will calculate based on the pricing procedure.
    Now my doubt is whatever the tax amount is showing in PO that we need to enter in to F-47,But here system is showing
    (Tax entered incorrect (code FU, amount      45,766.25), correct      36,882.24 INR).
    Now what should I do? Please help me on this..
    Regards,
    Schilukuri

  • Wrong calculation of Income Tax

    Hi Experts,
    We found some calculation error in SAP while calculating income tax
    for this f.y. 2010-11. We had entered Rs. 1,03,462.00 in infotype
    u201C586u201D for employee code u201C xxxx u201C . As per rule under section 80C
    maximum exempted amount is Rs.1,00,000/-, apart from this Rs.20,000/-
    will be exempted under the head u201C Infrastructure Bond u201C. When we
    process the payroll for the employee the system is calculating a sum
    of Rs. 1,12,822/- as tax exempted under chapter VI. System is
    considering the P.F. Contribution of the employee additionally.
    Can anyone guide me to solve the issue
    Nasim

    Solved by myself

  • Reg: Correction of Wrong  With holding tax  amount  Values Posted via BAPI

    Hello Experts,
    I have posted some invoices using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with With holding tax code and amount now the thing is that ..the document is posted successfully  with Wrong  With hoding tax amount data in TABLE WITH_ITEM due to this while executing t-code F-53 ( Outgoing payments )   its not calculating the with holding tax amount for the invoice .
    Now i wan't to correct ( Negate some values) the values in  WITH_ITEM table.....
    How am i going to do it..!
    Plz..experts help.
    Plz waiting for your input

    Dear All,
    this is not an error but the Standard System Design. Please read the note 611844. Only if You insert manually the WT amounts during the posting You will see them into the WT TAB after the posting. If You make the System to calculate the WT Aamounts automatically, no WT amounts will be reported into MIRO/MIR4. You can see them into the follow on document.
    I hope this helps.
    Mauri

  • Surcharge (x% on the calculated business tax)

    HI All,
    Happy new year to all.
    I am new SD module i am basically BI consultant, now i am doing the SD implementation  project.
    based on below scenario i have create new condition type.
    can any one help me.
    1.       tax example
    Business tax
    Transportation          3 %
    Other Services         5 %
    Surcharge (x% on the calculated business tax)
    Example:
    Transportation                      1000 Yuan
    Business tax (3%)                   30 Yuan
    Surcharge (e.g. 10%)                 3 Yuan
    Packets Domestic               1000 Yuan
    Business tax (5%)                   50 Yuan
    Surcharge (e.g. 10%)                 5 Yuan
    Business tax and surcharge will be displayed on the invoice in two separate lines.
    New Tax conditions type need to be customized.
    Attributes to determine the tax rate:
    ·         Tax classification customer
    ·         Tax classification material
    Thanks,
    kumarp

    Dear Kumar,
    As per my under stand, while u create Sales order time 3 condition types u want
    If my assumption right?
    First u need to main pricing procedure, in that maintain  condition types with from, to
    For Eg:
    S.No-Condition typeFrom-----To
    10-------Transportation
    20----
    Business Tax
    30--Surcharge--
    20
    Like this way u want main pricing procedure, this calculation reflect in sales order.
    Second one is u maintain condition records, Here maintain with percentage.
    If u maintain like this after sales order, billing u will get three separate lines.
    If any think wrong just tell me.
    Thanks
    Satya

  • Calculation of Tax Depreciation - India

    Hi,
    We are following the New GL Accounting setup to our US based client in India.
    My Leading Ledger (US) is Jan u2013 Dec and Non-leading Ledger (India) is April u2013 March.
    We also created different Fiscal Year variants (Year Dependent) as S1 and IN for both the Co codes.
    I have defined and activated Non-leading ledger for India Company code.
    All the transactions were posting correctly as per Leading and Non-leading ledgers except Tax Depreciation in Fixed Assets.
    I was able to post correct depreciation for India Company Act Depreciation area with a stated percentage. But the Tax depreciation area calculation is incorrect.
    Required Depreciation Calculation for Tax Depreciation Area as below:
    For Acquires & Additions:
    Rule1: If it is >=180 days (as per Non-leading ledger Fiscal year) the system should calculate depreciation as stated percentage. Eg: 10%
    Rule2:
    If it is <180 days (as per Non-leading ledger Fiscal year) the system should calculate depreciation of 50% on stated percentage. Eg: Stated percentage is 10%, then it should be 5%.
    I already copied India standard setting IT & NL to my fiscal year variant in Calender assignments of Period controls. But when I tried to post the Tax Depreciation in the month of March as per Non-leading ledger, the system is calculating full Depreciation as per Rule1 instead of 50% of stated Percentage in Rule2.
    Can any one of you kindly advice how to setup the Multi levels methods and Period controls for Tax Depreciation key in Indian Tax Depreciation area as per above requirement. I have been working on this since one week. Please help me.
    Thanks for the help.
    Regards,
    JBC

    I am not sure if this work.. but give it a try.
    In your multi-level method line 1 put Acq yr = 9999, Year = 999, Per = 6, Percent = 50
    line 2 put Acq yr = 9999, Year = 999, Per = 12, Percent = 10
    Now what i dont understand from your question is that is this rule for the first acquisition year only?
    If so, also try with Acq yr = 9999, Year = 1 (so only the first acq yr will get calculated based on the percentage).
    Try this in your sandbox and let me know if it works or not!!

  • Calculation of tax with two conditions

    hi all,
    i have an issue regarding tax in condition in po.
    i want the calculation of tax should be on two condition basis, while i am giving value in tax code field in invoice tab.
    1. when i am entering tax code, the value like- L1- 4%, L2- 12%, that is calculating on gross price.
    supose- GP- 100
         tax- 4%-     4
                        104
    then am puting fright charge- 10
    so total is 114
    2. supose- GP- 100
             fright     -  10
                            110
    then a will calculate- 4% on 110
    how this could be done, the 2nd one.
    thanks&regards
    susanta

    Hi,
    For this you have to treat Freight as a Discount Condition Type in MM Pricing
    Take a copy of RA01 in M/06 and keep it as Positive Condition
    Here keep
    Cond. class   A Discount or surcharge
    Calculat.type A Percentage
    Cond.category Blank
    And Plus/minus - A (Positive)
    Use this in Pricing Procedure (M/08) after Gross Price ad Discount conditions (before Subtotal)
    Now
    Base Price = 100
    Freight = 10
    Subtotal = 110
    Tax (4%) = on Subtotal

  • Delivery date in the PR is wrongly calculated

    Hi,
    This is a severe issue we are facing, delivery date in PR is wrongly calculating. consider this example:
    sales order was created on 31.08.2007 and the planned delivery time assigned in MMR is 9 days, GR processing time is 1 day. Due to some reasons we have created PR on 17.09.2007 but the system is showing the delivery time as 17.10.2007 the release date is on 05.10.2007
    Can any body tell me how system calculates delivery date in PR and wat are the factors influence this calculation and also the reason for this unusaual behavior of the system?
    Many thanks for your quick reply.
    Sri

    Please request one Abaper  to solve this problem.
    You cannot due nothing as the problem is in Code.
    Regards
    William

  • Disable auto-calculation of tax amount by Autoinvoices to import AR Invoice

    Hi all,
    I am using ra_interface_lines_all to do AR Invoices conversion to Oracle R12. My legacy invoices data contains tax amount and some of the invoices do not have any tax. Autoinvoice auto-calculated tax information during import even for those invoices that have no tax.
    I checked my AR interface record and made sure none of the tax-related columns (e.g. tax_code, tax_amount, etc) are populated. I also checked the AR transaction source for conversion and make sure tax-calculation flag is not set.
    Basically I need to set the tax amounts manually instead of letting the system to derive it. Some suggested to set tax_exempt_flag to "E". I tried but Autoinvoice complained that I need to have tax reason and besides I have many invoices that have tax amounts.
    Any suggestions on disable the auto-calculation of tax?
    Thanks! Mike

    Hi Mike,
    U r using transaction types to generate your distributions, right?
    Try to insert distribution info for each of your invoices in the table ra_interface_distributions_all, specifying REC, REV and TAX (tax where applicable) lines.
    Hope this will solve your prob.
    Vik

  • Changing base for calculation of Tax

    Hi All,
    SAP standard delivers 0001 condition type in Tax calculation procedure as base for calculation of Tax. condition type 0001 picks up 0PR0 as base for calcualtion of tax. Can someone tell me how does system picks up 0PR0 as base for calculation of tax as i have to change the base of calculation.
    Any hint would be a great help.

    I think I had the cart before the horse on this problem.  The correct way to look at this is what is the best way to get the correct "Net Book Value" and not the correct tax depreciation posting as it never actually gets booked.  
    By knowing the incorrect Beginning BV, the rate depreciation is applied in year 1 and finally the desired Net BV value at the end of year 1 for tax purposes I am able to calculate the correct Unplanned Depreciation for tax to make everything work out correctly.
    correct beginning tax BV $1,200
    Beginning Asset Book Value $1,800
    depreciation $360 (20% of BV)
    Unplanned depreciation  $?
    Net BV for tax at end of Yr1  $960 ;  or  1,200 - (1,200*.2)
    With the know values above that makes my unplanned depreciation for Yr 1 to be $480.  Year 1 and all following years depreciate correctly after the Unplanned Depreciation is posted.
    I am marking this as resolved unless someone sees an error in my thinking.
    Thanks,
    Jeff

  • F-47 Not Calculating Wh Tax

    Hi Gurus,
    I've decided to create this discussion because I couldn't find my solution as in previous thread :
    F-47 not calculating Withholding Tax
    I want to create posting with F-47 so that when I post with F-48 Withholding taxes will be deducted from the down payment.
    Below are the configuration in the system :
    1. Wh tax is defined as invoice only (not at payment).
    2. Extended wh tax is active and already assigned to company code with validity period still active
    3. Field status variant in OB41 for posting key 29, 39, 31, for taxes wh tax code and wh amount are opt. entry
    4. Field status variant in OB14 for field status group G026, G067, and those related to my recon account for wh tx code and wh amount are opt. entry
    When I post with normal invoice FB60, the wh tax is calculated, but when using DP request or special gl down payment, the wh tax is not calculated, SAP gives message "Withholding tax information is missing from the line item.
    I have also check and apply solution in notes 1626838 - WT pop up not appear, but all of them is not solving my issue.
    I need to activate withholding tax with spc gl, Is there any steps that I missing ?
    Thank you.

    Hi
    Please see below path for config
    Defined Tax type
    Tax code for Payment tax type
    assign to company code
    Assoign GL code for both Invoice and payment Withholding tax .
    many Thanks

  • R/3 archiving - wrong calculated field on 2LIS_02_ITM extractor

    Hello.
    An info and a question for who developed an archiving with r/3..
    We have found an issue related with the R/3 archiving and LIS_02_ITM.
    A calculed field (Delivery Quantity Variance in %); (field name = MABW) (you can see it at http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/58/f6383fdb800804e10000000a114084/frameset.htm )gives wrong data.
    The MABW is calculated using MSEG infos.
    MSEG infos were archived (and deleted), so, the calculation goes bad and returns wrong value.
    In front of the archiving process, we potentially will find problems due to the standard extractor behaviour.
    Have you ever noticed the same behaviour because of the wrong calculation onto the fields?
    thank you in advance for your cooperation...!
    Dieguz
    The details are the following :
    We have a R/3 PRODUCTION system (called MP0), connected with three BW
    ones (MP2,
    MP4, AP4).
    Someone performed an R/3 data archiving, using an archiving tool
    (IXOS).They archived the data with a one-to-one object approach :
    FI_DOCUMNT archived 18 months from clearing date.
    MM_MATBEL archived 24 mesi from posting date
    SD_VBRK archived 24 mesi from posting date
    RV_LIKP archived 24 mesi from posting date
    SD_VBAK archived 24 mesi from posting date
    MM_ACCTIT 18 months from posting date
    OIG_SHIPMNT 24 months from posting date
    MM_INV_BEL 24 months from posting date
    RL_TA 12 months from posting date
    RL_TB 12 months from posting date
    In the R/3 system, after the archiving, those documents were deleted.
    Our BW systems extract data using custom extractors and standard ones.
    - 2LIS_02_*
    - 2LIS_03_BF
    - 2LIS-11_*
    - 2LIS-17_*
    - 2LIS_13_*
    - 0FI_AR_4
    - 0FI_GL_4
    - 0FI_AP_4
    - 0EC_PCA_3
    - 0CO_OM_CCA_9
    We have found problems with 2LIS_02_ITM;
    During the delta extraction, we found records related with Purchase
    Order, with GR archived, that have MBAW field (Delivery Quantity
    Variance in %
    ) with "-100" value; the correct value should be "0" (because the
    Purchase Order was completed).
    MP0 is a 40B R/3 SYSTEM SP 83, PLUGIN 2004.1
    Thank you in advance for you cooperation
    best regards
    Diego

    Hi Waldemar,
    LOEKZ  (Deletion indicator in purchasing document) is not available in standard extract structure we have append that field with append structure in RSA 6.
    BUKRS is available in standard extract structure :
    In  lo-cockpit open extract structure and select BUKRS(Company code) field transfer to left side .
    2. click  data source maintenance check BUKRS field .
    you will get BUKRS field in 2lis_o2_ITM
    Thanks
    Sree

  • Invoice Date as default to calculate tax in MIRO

    Hi,
    I need to make Invoice date as default to calculate tax in MIRO.Can anybody suggest me User-Exit or BADI to do the same?
    i need to calculate the tax according to Invoice date and not system date (posting date).

    hi!
      You can set transaction variant for your requirement using T.code SHD0 and that too only if the requirement is needed for all LIV postings. In SHD0 you can enable the tick and set the field in display mode. If the requirement is not for all postings then you copy the MIRO trtansaction USING T.Code OMW9 and set the transaction variant for that new t.code. But if you want to create a new t.code its upto you to check all other requirements.
    Reward if useful.
    Yuvi.

Maybe you are looking for