Wrong fund center updation in financial entry

dear all,
I am facing the typical problem with system , we have created service P.O with fund center xxxx and trying to do the service entry sheet by adopting the services from P.O and changed the Fund center to yyyy.
we have used the same service number multiple time in one S.E.S and changed its fund center to yyyy. when we release the S.E.S its financial entry are showing some with xxxx and some entries with yyyy fund center in single S.E.S for one service.
can any one explain, how this happends and suggest the solution..!!
Regards,
Manu

hi
check is there any substitution is used in finance for line item

Similar Messages

Change/Updation of old PRs, POs with FM Objects i.e. Fund, Fund Center etc.

Dear Experts
We are implementing Funds Management-BCS in our Business.
The effective Year is FROM 2011 Financial Year. And we are creating the FM Objects i.e. Fund, Fund Center, Budget Period with Valid From Date is 1st April 2011.
Also we made the configuration settings of "Allow BLANK as Value for Account Assignment Elements" is TO YEAR 2010 Financial Year.
Our questions are:
1. When we make any changes in the old Purchase Requisitions, Purchase Orders etc., created in Financial Year 2010 or before; whether the system will check that 'Valid From date' of Fund, Fund Centers should be on or before date of Purchase Requisition or Purchase Order creation date or not?
2. When we try to update old open PRs, POs which are created in Finanicla Year 2010 or before with FM Objects i.e. Fund, Fund Center etc. through Transaction Code FMCN; whether the system will check that 'Valid From date' of Fund, Fund Centers should be on or before date of Purchase Requisition or Purchase Order creation date or not?
We request you to provide your valuable suggestion/information.
Thanks and Regards
PVSRG

Hi Gupta, how are u!?
P.V.S.R. Gupta wrote:
> When we implemented FM-BCS effective from Financial Year 2011; why the system is expecting to contain/having FM Account Assignment Objects in old PRs, POs etc., existing in the Financial Year 2010 or before?
You active BCS for year 2011, thats all right., but if u have got FMDERIVE rules, when u change PRs or POs the strategic derivation detect this operation and try to input Assignment Objects.
Please try to trace that chances with TRACE tool from FMDERIVE.
If u need more help about trace, please check the OSS note: [666322|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/666322].
Make an entire process, and view the log
Regards,
Osvaldo.

Error while Updating Fund Center in Work Order

Hi All,
In out System, we have integrated PM-FM. in that, we have incorporated a "User-Exit" which populates the User a change-of "Cost Centre" just while saving the order; where the User can insert any other Cost center other than the one already picked & displayed by the System.
The problem now in FM is that; the initially displayed cost center prior to the update of cost center; is the one that is picked by the FM Derivation Strategy; which does not get updated when the new cost center is updated.
Hence, although the Order contains a new Cost center; the Fund Center displayed is the one that was mapped to the prior cost center according to the FM Derivation Strategy in FMDerive.
Kindly help !!
Thanks in Advance.................
Regards,
Pratham

Sahu
Can you also post a screen-shot of the error message popup.
PeteA

MM-FM integration. How to stop update of Fund Center and Commitment Item

Hello!
Anyone please help. MM-FM integration.
Our problem is after automatic creation of PR and PO from work orders, and the fund center and commitment item in the PR and PO has been changed/updated by the user, and then we change something in the work order and save it, the fund center and commitment item of the PR and PO goes back to default value (based on FMderive). Is there a way to stop this?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Rona

It seems like you have selected "Do not overwrite target values" option in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in the derivation rule defined.
Go through SAP Note 666322, make sure the Trace feature in On and then choose the option "Overwrite Target Values" in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in your derivation rule. After that, see the Difference before and after values in the trace log created after performing the derivation rule.
I am sure this will help.
Regards,
Amar Lal

Fund center and commitment item not updated

Hi!
We are using Funds Management together with SRM. When we change the value of e.g. cost center and not the account assignment itself we do not get an update on fund center. When changing account we do not get an update on commitment item either. This is standard SAP and we have been asked to use BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI. Have anyone else had this problem?
I would really appreciate if anyone have some code for this BADI or any other badi e.g. BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI. It is only important that changes in PO when replicated to back end results in the correct update of commitment item and fund center.
Sincerely
Andres

Solved through BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI

How update Fund Center and Commitment Item after posting

hi Experts,
Funds management was activated during the year and hence there are few open items saved without capturing Fund Center and Commitment Item. When i tried to clear these open item i get the following error
Line in document xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx does not contain any commitment items
Is there any program which i can use to update derivation to the already posted line item
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
Solutions proposed by Alexey are good if FM document was created for the FI documents in question. If, however, no FM document was created, reassignment process won't help. You can try FMN0 transaction after creating a derivation rule in FMDERIVE for these documents, but I cannot confirm that it would be sucessful as FMN0 transaction is not perfect.
The solution could be updating FI tables (BSEG/BSIS/BSAS) with FM assignment (fund centre/commitment item) and only then running FMN0 transaction. In this case, FM document will be created and you'll be able to process the items.
Regards,
Eli

Entry in field Funds Center required; check the field control Mg No.FMEF010

Hi,
We have a Z tcode for converting planned order to purchase requisition.
We use Account assignment P - Project and A - Asset.
We have WBS element and fund center linked to it.
For the Z tcode while converting Planned order to purchase requisition we are getting below error
Error: Entry in field Funds Center required; check the field control Msg No.FMEF010
While creating manually purchase requisition with same GL code and WBS element the fund center gets automatically picked.
Can anyone pls let me know in which table we can find the link between WBS element and fund center so that we can code the same in our program. In PRPS table we can find the link between WBS and profit center.
Or is there any user exit that can be used.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Radha

Hello
If you do a F1 in the value date field it will give you the answer - The value date is used in bank accounts and bank sub-accounts.
As regards the other query check whether the tax code has been already created.
Hope it helps.
Rgds

In ME51 fund center field to be made "optional entry"

Hi experts,
How to make Fund Center and Commitment Item field in ME51 "Optional Entry"?
Regards
Jay

hi
I am using ECC6.0 and in ME51N Fund center and commitment items are optional entry fields.
I am facing this problem only in ME51.
As per customer requirement Acc *** Cat field is made "Display only".
I am getting following message
No funds center entered/derived in item 00001
Message no. FI313
Diagnosis
    In company code (&2) the component Funds Management is active. This
    requires the entries or the derivation of a funds center.
    You can use the following elements to derive the funds center: comp
    code GNFC/ account 224001 or CO object .
Procedure
    Enter a funds center or ensure that the funds center can be derived
    the possible assignments by:
    o   assigning a funds center in the commitment items- master record
        maintaining the assigning of a funds center to the CO object.
thanks & regards
jay

Update Fund & Fund center data in auto generated PR during MRP RUN

Problem in the MRP auto generated PRs.
The normal PRs created manually have all relevant fields of fund center viz CO area ,commitment item,Funds center, fund.
But the problem is with respect to the Purchase Requisitions generated automatically during the MRP RUN.
How to include the fund centers in MRP generated PRs automatically in the creation stage itself instead of going into change mode using ME52n Transaction code and change it to include fund centers one by one for each line item.
We require this as we have hundreds of PRs generated every day.

Hi,
In order to fulfill this requirement, transaction FM_MRP_PR should be used.
Please also take a look to FM_MRP_PR on-line documentation :
The PRs generated from the MRP run are considered as planning documents
and do not have any impact on the budget. To encumber these PRs in the
corresponding settlement receivers, you have to execute this program for
the relevant PRs.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Funds center and commetment item

Good evening!
We are HCM consultants. We were asked by our FI department to conduct a
post run for two personnel numbers in development system.
After the post run, the documents consider errors which say, for
example, that "in position 00001 21 993-05 commitment item was not
determined". 21 is a company code, 993-05 is a G/L account. This error
occurs for numerous accounts. Our FI says that they have customized
everything for 21 company code and have put commitment items for every
G/L account. They ask whether it is possible to customize fields for
funds center and commitment item in HCM, IT0015 where we determine
account assignment.
In the SAP course IPS910 they found a passage about HCM and FI
integration where is said that "Funds center and Fund can be determined
for org. unit/position/personnel. In addition to funds center and fund
there can be determind also a commitment item for info-types
considering account assignmet (0014,0015,2001-2005,2010)".
We in HCM guess that there is something wrong with FI customizing, 'cos
in HCM it's impossible to activate those fields, or even if it
possible - it's wrong.
The question is - is it possible to add fields for funds center in HCM
(IT0015) or it's not worth doing?
Best regards,
Eldar
Steps for Reconstruction
1. In HCM all the entris are standard. We made entries in IT0015,
started payroll and posting.
2. FI made their customizing for 21 company code.

Hello Eldar,
I will provide you some hints below.
1) To have the integration between PSM-FM and HCM, in PSM side you should check:
SPRO (IMG)
Public Sector Management
Funds Management Government
Actual and Commitment Update/Integration
Integration
Integration with Human Resources (HR)
Please check all the sub-menus there and the documentation available in from of each link. It is very good and provides some links for all the customizings that needs to be done.
2) Check also the configuration as it is described in the enclosed note 766613. It is related to view V_T588N.
3) If Funds Management and Controlling are updated in an integrated way such that the cost center is always the leading account assignment and the fund center is derived, the HR must not (and does not) support the maintenance of derived information (such as fund center). Thus there are the following three possible scenarios:
- Funds Management (FM) is not active.   -> HR doesn't show Fund Center
- FM is active but without CO-Integration-> HR shows Fund Center
- FM is active with CO Integration       -> HR doesn't show Fund Center
With CO Integration turned on, the derivation functionality is utilized to determine the Fund Center in HR. However, if you are looking for manual input in the FC field (and subsequent saving of this value on
the database), all I can provide would be a modification to inform HR that the FC field is active.
To perform that, you would need to make the following coding change to give HR the indication that the field should be displayed and edited:
FUNCTION FM_DC_GET_ACTIVE_DIMENSIONS:
    if ( CO-FM-Integration is on )
       IF ( l_f_fm01-co_integration = con_on ).         <   Delete
       IF ( l_f_fm01-co_integration = con_on AND     <   Insert
         NOT l_f_fm01-co_int_start_hr IS INITIAL ).     <   Insert
       IF ( l_f_fm01-co_integration = con_on AND
You will need to perform the necessary testing in HR to ensure that it is functioning as intended as I am unsure of the differences in the HR functionality between 46C and ECC 600.
These scenarios can be maintained with time dependence (active from-dates): There can be a period for the first, a second time interval for the second and a third time interval for the last scenario.
4) Please check if you have implemented note 918775. It should be present in your system
5) Please check if you have implemented note 755796. It should be present in your system
6) Please check also the note 701933.
I hope I could help you
Let me know your comments if I am going in the wrong direction.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

No funds center derived for GR IR account

Dear all,
We have faced a strange issue in Funds Management. We have a GR IR GL account for which system automatically derives the commitment item and fund center based on those in the PO. That is, whatever FC and CI are maintained in the PO, the GR IR account derives the same accounts during MIRO.
However this is true only for material POs. We have created a service PO for a specific network of a project. In this particular case the system is not allowing us to post the invoice as it cannot derive the fund center. It seems during MIRO, the FM accounts of PO are not getting linked to the GR IR account. Please note that GR (or service entry sheet entry) is not relevant for budget consumption. Budget consumption takes place during PR,PO and MIRO.
Request your input in this regard.
Thanks
Snigdho

Hi,
First of all, you need to be sure that all existent correction notes are implemented in your system.
Please check if the following notes are applied in your system (including manual steps):
1289547 FM account assignment incorrect in GR/IR clearing in service
1327560 GR Account Assignments based on previoustly posted SES
1429223 GR Account Assignments based on previoustly posted SES II
1450965 FM account assignment incorrectly inherited from PO
1480503 FM account assignment for GL line overwritten in MIRO
1502874 Planned Delivery Costs are not updated during GR/IR postings
These notes correct wrong behaviours in include LFMCOBLF06 related to account assignment.
If the notes are not there but are valid to your current release/package, please apply all in one test system and retest your issue.
Regarding inheriting the FM assignments, material po's can retrieve the FM account assignments from the FM tables.
This ensures that the current FM account assigments are always used.
However, in the case of Services, it is not possible to use the FM tables as it is not guaranteed that the correct Account assigment will be retrieved. So, the SES table ESKN is used instead. The ESKN record is created at the time the SES is created.
In Summary: Due to the structure of Service documents, the FM tables cannot be used to access the previous document's account assignment. Material documents can use the FM tables to get the previous account assignemnt. So, for Material documents, FMDERIVE does not need to be called when a predecessor document is found. However, FMDERIVE needs to be called for SES because the SES application table does not store FM fields. So, this needs to be rederived.
I suggest you also to read SAP Note 923672 (do not apply it).
The account assignments on the SES screen are indeed changable. This is part of the standard design for SES process. Unfortunately, FM cannot control if the fields on the account assignment popup screen should be in edit, display, or hidden mode. This screen is control by SES, therefore is good that you check also this customizing in MM:
IMG - Materials Management - Purchasing - Account Assignment - Maintain Account Assignment Categories
In this activity, for the account assignment category which is the account assignment category used in the P.O., you have flag 'Acct. Assg. Changeable', then, the account assignment should be derived again. Not sure if you can restrict by different processes and for SES have this flag not marked so FMDERIVE will be not called and the FM account assignments would be inherit from the PO.
From my understanding, if the PO concern is a service PO, it is legitimate to accept the service (via ML81N) with different account assignments. Hence, the account assignment fields are not hidden or in display mode only.
From FM point of view, if a user does not deliberately change the account assignments on the SES screen or FMDERIVE is not setup to overwrite the FM account assignments, then by default the FM account assignments are inherited from the PO.
I hope this helps to overcome your issue.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Excise invoice financial entry is vary

Hi All,
when i create a excise invoice for the same vendor(10026) first one is november'09 and then create second one on December'09 but the financial entry was varied for those excise invoice. Please find the attached data entry view.
1. While Updating the Export sales for Novemberu201909 the financial entry is as follow. (correct one)
Company code Line item     Posting Key     Special G/L Indicator     Account     Description     Amount     Currency     Tax Code
1000     1     40          110201     ED-Rebate Claim     19879     INR     OT
1000     2     40          110201     ED-Rebate Claim     4146     INR     OT
1000     3     40          110201     ED-Rebate Claim     846     INR     OT
1000     4     50          110224     Cess Availed     -243     INR     OT
1000     5     50          110220     Cenvat Availed     -24143     INR     OT
1000     6     50          110228     H&S Cess Availed     -485     INR     OT
2. While Updating the Export sales for December u201909 the financial entry is as follow. (wrong one)
Company code Line item     Posting Key     Special G/L Indicator     Account     Description     Amount     Currency     Tax Code
1000     1     40          110216     CENVAT Suspense     2139     INR     OT
1000     2     40          110216     CENVAT Suspense     1848     INR     OT
1000     3     40          110216     CENVAT Suspense     390     INR     OT
1000     4     50          110232     RG23A SEC                           -44     INR     OT
1000     5     50          200305     RG23A BED - Sales     -4247     INR     OT
1000     6     50          200143     RG23A - E.Cess     -86     INR     OT
Please help me to solve this issue.
Thanks,
Suresh.M

ch

System asking for Fund Center for Reconciliatation GL-S.Creditors

Hi,
I followed the steps as per the note, Dump Error due to Fund Management module activation now the dump error is gone, but I am getting one more error message while posting any transaction.
For example- I am posting a Vendor Invoice in F-02.
I am entering Cost Center in Expense Line. But system is showing error message for Vendor Line, that is Vendor A/C.
Error Message:
No funds center entered/derived in item 00001 (TY01/50101400/)
Message no. FI313
Diagnosis
In company code (&2) the component Funds Management is active. This requires the entries or the derivation of a funds center.
You can use the following elements to derive the funds center: company code TY01/ account 50101400 or CO object .
Procedure
Enter a funds center or ensure that the funds center can be derived from the possible assignments by:
assigning a funds center in the commitment items- master record or maintaining the assigning of a funds center to the CO object.
Note***GL A/C 50101400 is S.Creditors account. Now, I am not understanding why system needs Fund Center for S.Creditors in Vendor Line while posting Vendor Invoice. We have assigned Statistical Commitment Item in S.Creditor GL and hence there is no Fund Center assigned to it.
SCN names removed/
Message was edited by: Eli Klovski

Sorry for that. Its noted.
Just for some clarification. Fund Center and Commitment Items are mandatory fields, but the issue I am facing is completely different.
I checked with FMDERIVE in my system and checked the pattern for Fund Centers and Commitment Items created. Only P/L items and Cost Centers are created as Fund Centers and Commitments Items.
Also, the S.Creditors GL is not a Cost Element, hence there is no link to Commitment Item- FMRULES.
1. Even though, the S.Creditors has been assigned with Commitment 1.
Commitment Item-1 Master Conditions as below:
Financial trans.-30
Commitment Item Category- 3
Is this conditions correct?
2. We have Fund Center- Dummy as well.
Can you suggest me, how to configure this in FMDERIVE?

Fund center mandatory

hi All,
I´m looking for a way to link a client to a Fund center I didn´t find a way to do it but in this company is the way they use reports, so I think they used an user exit or another way I thought about sustitutions but still i cann´t make it mandatory
Thanks and regards

Hi,
As soons as you activate FM component, fund centre will become manadatory for every financial document which creates FM entry.
Regards,
Eli

Derivation of Funds Center from cost center for Asset PR/PO in FM

Hello Experts,
We configured new FM area and relevant BCS settings. It is working fine except PR or PO for Account assignment category A.
Issue: system is not able derive funds center from cost center in the asset master. cost center is not updated in EBKN table for Asset PR.
we have maintained the following;
1. Funds center is activated in Asset account assignments
2. Maintained derivation rule with function module: FMDT_READ_MD_ASSET
3. Derivation rule for cost center to funds center also maintained
If maintain funds center manually in PR it is working fine and consuming budget also.
Requirement: How derive funds center from cost center assigned in asset. I have verified all tickets raised in this forum, but nothing has answered my question.
Request you to provide solution for above issue.
Thanks in advance for support.
Regards,
Chalapathi

Hi Venkata,
You have two derivation rules, first related to Asset function module and second one is related to CC and FC combination.
You need to maintain the function module derivation rule first then you need to maintain the derivation rule related to combination of CC and FC. Because first you need to derive CC from asset master and then you need to derive fund center with reference to this CC.
Regards,
Ankit Agarwal

Wrong fund center updation in financial entry

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for