Fund center and commitment item not updated

Hi!
We are using Funds Management together with SRM. When we change the value of e.g. cost center and not the account assignment itself we do not get an update on fund center. When changing account we do not get an update on commitment item either. This is standard SAP and we have been asked to use BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI. Have anyone else had this problem?
I would really appreciate if anyone have some code for this BADI or any other badi e.g. BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI. It is only important that changes in PO when replicated to back end results in the correct update of commitment item and fund center.
Sincerely
Andres

Solved through BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI

Similar Messages

  • MM-FM integration. How to stop update of Fund Center and Commitment Item

    Hello!
    Anyone please help. MM-FM integration.
    Our problem is after automatic creation of PR and PO from work orders, and the fund center and commitment item in the PR and PO has been changed/updated by the user, and then we change something in the work order and save it, the fund center and commitment item of the PR and PO goes back to default value (based on FMderive). Is there a way to stop this?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Rona

    It seems like you have selected "Do not overwrite target values" option in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in the derivation rule defined.
    Go through SAP Note 666322, make sure the Trace feature in On and then choose the option "Overwrite Target Values" in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in your derivation rule. After that, see the Difference before and after values in the trace log created after performing the derivation rule.
    I am sure this will help.
    Regards,
    Amar Lal

  • How update Fund Center and Commitment Item after posting

    hi Experts,
    Funds management was activated during the year and hence there are few open items saved without capturing Fund Center and Commitment Item. When i tried to clear these open item i get the following error
    Line  in document xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx   does not contain any commitment items
    Is there any program which i can use to update derivation to the already posted line item
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi,
    Solutions proposed by Alexey are good if FM document was created for the FI documents in question. If, however, no FM document was created, reassignment process won't help. You can try FMN0 transaction after creating a derivation rule in FMDERIVE for these documents, but I cannot confirm that it would be sucessful as FMN0 transaction is not perfect.
    The solution could be updating FI tables (BSEG/BSIS/BSAS) with FM assignment (fund centre/commitment item) and only then running FMN0 transaction. In this case, FM document will be created and you'll be able to process the items.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Fund Center and Commitment Item

    Hi All ,
                What is the Fund Center and Commitment Item also the use of it.
    regards
    sunil

    The fund center is the budget which is issued by the managemnet for the specific area (cost center) . The same will be released in each periodical wise as per decision taken.
    Example Maintenance team has one fund center. So all the times for his expenses the fund will be deducted from provision. Basically it is linking with cost center.
    The commitmenet item comes under the fund center. It menas that you may have repair& services, Labour charges, spares etc. each commitment item has own budget value under your fund center. exaplme if you are taking the spares your spares budget will deduct.
    I think u got something, but for explation here is not possible since its big subject.

  • Static Fund Center and Commitment Item

    Dear All,
    We have recently implemented Funds Management in our organisation and there are a few issues due to corrections in the account assignment derivation data by the user.
    We have a derivation strategy that gets the Funds Center and Commitment Item values from the GL/Cost Center combination.
    Now, the user frequently changes the cost center as there is little clarity with regards to which cost center should the assigned costs go to.
    Now when the user enters the Cost Center and the GL the first time, the FC and CI get populated in the PR - fine till now...But when before saving the PR, he changes the cost center, the new assignment does not get picked up. The budget consumption too happens in the old fund center and commitment item corresponding to the first entered cost center / gl combination.
    We ran a trace and we found that the trace has the new cost center in it, but the old funds center and commitment item, with the explanation that "None of the target fields are to be derived."
    We have given account assignment as changeable in the cost center (K) account assignment. And the FC and CI are in the optional mode with the account assignment.
    Is there any way by which the FC and CI value gets picked based on the latest changes and not on the last held data ? Or any user exit that might get the values from the FMDERIVE each time the data is entered and the return key hit ?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Wy.

    Hi Aleksey,
    Thanks for the note !
    Looks like the note was implemented already for a previous storage location-based development.
    We have now made a change to the existing path - the existing FC/CI values are deleted first and the new values picked from FMDERIVE everytime we hit 'ENTER' or 'SAVE'.
    This way, every change to the PR has the FMDERIVE check, and the values are indirectly refreshed this way.
    Not sure if this is the right path, but could not find a better alternative to account for the innumerable corrections to the purchasing documents that take place at our organisation.
    Regards,
    Wy.

  • Funds center and commetment item

    Good evening!
    We are HCM consultants. We were asked by our FI department to conduct a
    post run for two personnel numbers in development system.
    After the post run, the documents consider errors which say, for
    example, that "in position 00001 21 993-05 commitment item was not
    determined". 21 is a company code, 993-05 is a G/L account. This error
    occurs for numerous accounts. Our FI says that they have customized
    everything for 21 company code and have put commitment items for every
    G/L account. They ask whether it is possible to customize fields for
    funds center and commitment item in HCM, IT0015 where we determine
    account assignment.
    In the SAP course IPS910 they found a passage about HCM and FI
    integration where is said that "Funds center and Fund can be determined
    for org. unit/position/personnel. In addition to funds center and fund
    there can be determind also a commitment item for info-types
    considering account assignmet (0014,0015,2001-2005,2010)".
    We in HCM guess that there is something wrong with FI customizing, 'cos
    in HCM it's impossible to activate those fields, or even if it
    possible - it's wrong.
    The question is - is it possible to add fields for funds center in HCM
    (IT0015) or it's not worth doing?
    Best regards,
    Eldar       
    Steps for Reconstruction    
    1. In HCM all the entris are standard. We made entries in IT0015,
    started payroll and posting.
    2. FI made their customizing for 21 company code.

    Hello Eldar,
    I will provide you some hints below.
    1) To have the integration between PSM-FM and HCM, in PSM side you should check:
    SPRO (IMG)
    Public Sector Management
    Funds Management Government
    Actual and Commitment Update/Integration
    Integration
    Integration with Human Resources (HR)
    Please check all the sub-menus there and the documentation available in from of each link. It is very good and provides some links for all the customizings that needs to be done.
    2) Check also the configuration as it is described in the enclosed note 766613. It is related to view V_T588N.
    3) If Funds Management and Controlling are updated in an integrated way such that the cost center is always the leading account assignment and the fund center is derived, the HR must not (and does not) support the maintenance of derived information (such as fund center). Thus there are the following three possible scenarios:
    - Funds Management (FM) is not active.   -> HR doesn't show Fund Center
    - FM is active but without CO-Integration-> HR shows Fund Center
    - FM is active with CO Integration       -> HR doesn't show Fund Center
    With CO Integration turned on, the derivation functionality is utilized to determine the Fund Center in HR. However, if you are looking for manual input in the FC field (and subsequent saving of this value on
    the database), all I can provide would be a modification to inform HR that the FC field is active.
    To perform that, you would need to make the following coding change to give HR the indication that the field should be displayed and edited:
    FUNCTION FM_DC_GET_ACTIVE_DIMENSIONS:
        if ( CO-FM-Integration is on )
           IF ( l_f_fm01-co_integration = con_on ).         <   Delete
           IF (  l_f_fm01-co_integration  =  con_on AND     <   Insert
             NOT l_f_fm01-co_int_start_hr IS INITIAL ).     <   Insert
           IF (  l_f_fm01-co_integration  =  con_on AND
    You will need to perform the necessary testing in HR to ensure that it is functioning as intended as I am unsure of the differences in the HR functionality between 46C and ECC 600.
    These scenarios can be maintained with time dependence (active from-dates): There can be a period for the first, a second time interval for the second and a third time interval for the last scenario.
    4) Please check if you have implemented note 918775. It should be present in your system
    5) Please check if you have implemented note  755796. It should be present in your system
    6) Please check also the note 701933.
    I hope I could help you 
    Let me know your comments if I am going in the wrong direction.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Fund managment exceeding the budgeted and committed items

    Dear All,
    In my client place we implement the fund management.  we create the department wise fund center and related committed items.
    For example for the Fund center Administration Expenses- Committed item is Advertising expenses.  When ever i made the payment to that particular expenses if i exceed the budgeted amount it will though error .
    Like this i am getting for the some of the fund center and commitment items. I am having department wise fund center and commitment items list of 50 under that for  25 fund center whenever i exceed the budget it shows the error message for the some of the fund centers it not showing any warning message. and also allowing to make entries so my fund center report is showing negative values. so please guide to solve this issue.
    Regards
    girija

    Dear Alex,
    in my client in Availability control limit
    they send for
    MSL  MSL001  pb selected  proceed ++ Action 1  usage % 90
    Msl   Ms002                                              Action 3 usage % 100
    it is correct or not  pl guide to solve this issue for half of  the  fund center and commitment item when exceed the budget it is through error but for the remaining fund center is is accepting.
    Regards,
    girija
    Edited by: k.r.girija devi devi on Nov 13, 2009 5:14 AM

  • Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

    Hi to all,
    We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
    We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
    We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO  posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
    Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Y.Kiran Babu

    Hi,
    For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
    I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
    First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
    For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
    You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
    FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
    When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
    Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
    The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
    Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
    FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
    FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
    FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
    You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
    FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
    If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672.  This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines.  Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
    Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
    Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
    1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
    2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records.  However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
    If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
    3) Run reconstruction for AVC
    You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
        o  Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
        o  Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
           Control System (BCS)
    Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
    I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Cost Element Category and Commitment Item Cat. for PS Cash Mgmt

    Dear All,
    We are activating PS Cash Mgmt.
    I want to know the difference between:
    1. Maintaining the Cost Element Category as 1 and 11. Is it necessary to maintain 11 (Revenues) or maintaining 1 (Primary costs/cost-reducing revenues) will have same result.
    2. In Comm. Item Financial Tran. maintained is 30. But for Commitment Item Cat. as 3 (Expenditures) or 2 (Revenues) only to be assigned for revenue.
    Our Client is asking to maintain everything as 3 (Expenditures) to all the commitment items. What will be the effect on PS Cash Management if I use Cost Element Category as 1 & Commitment Item Cat. as 3 ?
    Regards
    Shubham

    Hi,
    Cost element category as 1 and commint Item caterory 3 holds good for all expenses, so you can use this, with this when you process Invoice In MIRO a Project cash management document will get generated and this will update the report against the payments in CJIA as well in S_ALR_87013574 reports etc.
    Combination for creating commitment items is
    Cost element category 1 --> Commitment item category as 3 and Financial Transaction as 30
    Cost element category 11--> Commitme nt Item category as 2 and Financial Trns as 30.
    Note : what ever the G/L accounts created wrt Chart of accounts, whether it is Expenses or Inventory or Revenues, you have to assign commitment item in the G/L Master in Create/bank/interest tab in field commitment item. If it is not assigned in all modules you will get error as commitment item not assigned.
    Thanks
    Regards
    kishore

  • Job CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS_2 does not update SC in SRM With PO

    Hello,
    We are on SRM 5.0 Classic scenario  R3 SAP  ECC 6.0. we recently had a stackupgrade for all our different components.
    Aswe are in a classic scenario we get a prucahse requisition after a shopping cart is approved. The purchaser then creates a purchase order and the program  BBP_GET_STATUS_2 and CLEAN_REQREQ_UP updates the shopping cart  with the PO information.
    For these 2 programmes we have created one Job. The problem  that we now encounter is that the job doesn't update the Shopping cart with the PO information. Only the purchase reuiqisition is visisble. If i go to transaction BBP_PD for that shopping cart i see Item in transfer process marked red. From  BBP_PD I can run BBP_GET_STATUS_2 and CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and the nthe shopping is updated.
    So to summarize: The jobs (BBP_GET_STATUS_2 and CLEAN_REQREQ_UP ) do not update the shopping cart but running BBP_GET_STATUS_2 and CLEAN_REQREQ_UP  manually the Shopping cart is updated.
    The users who running the jobs seem to be ok.
    Any idea ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Check this.
    In the backend system, you activate the application SRMNTY in table TBE11 using transaction FIBF so that the purchase order follow-on data is transferred from the SAP backend to the SRM system. In this way, the SRM system is notified when follow-on documents are created in the backend system.
    Check teh variant, Check if the Backend system has been changed, Run BDLS if changed
    regards,
    MRao
    Edited by: Mahesh Rao T.C on Oct 14, 2010 12:31 PM

  • Error : Balancing Field " Profit Center" in line item not filled

    Dear Friends,
    I have a specific issue, as my client while posting inventory differences in [MI07]  an error is populating as Balancing Field "Profit Center" in line item not filled.
    Please help me in solving the issue where we can assign the profit center other than in materal master as they donot maintained any profit center in material master for all materials
    Thanks inadvance
    Sri

    Hi BK , thanks for your answer
    in kch3 there are several profit center groups and how can we identify whcih profit center is assigned to whcih profit center group
    regards
    sri

  • GL Account and Commitment Items Integration

    Hi Consultants,
    Please explain the GL account and commitment items relationship.  I know i can assign a commitment item to N number of GL accounts.
    But can i assign many commitment items to one GL account?
    Thank you.
    Ekemini

    Dear FM Expert,
    I 'm new in the forum. I have some problem related to fmderive too. I have to do as your scenario that is to derive stat committment item to depreciation expense account. I use fmderive with user exit EXIT_SAPLFMDT_001 and include ZXFMDTU01
    Coding to check AFAB tcode to derive the committment item. It's not work
    if sy-tcode+0(4) = 'AFAB'.
        if I_FMDERIVE_SOURCE-account_number = 'xxx'.
          e_fmderive_target-commit_item = 'xxx'.
        endif.
    ENDIF.
    When I set trace , It seems work when test run for AFAB but when I do production run that need run in background. It does not work. Is there anything wrong with my code or Does fmderive work with Background job
    Is there any suggesttion , please  ?
    Thank you very much,
    one

  • Financial transaction and commitment item category

    Hello,
    Can any one suggest what financial transaction and commitment item category can be used when creating the following commitment items:
    u2022     Value added tax (VAT)
    u2022     tax on profits
    u2022     before-tax income
    u2022     nett income
    u2022     net financial result
    And moreover, should such a commitment items be created?
    Thanks
    Irina

    Hi Irina,
    As I said, the real question is whether you are going to use these commitment items for budget management. If not, it does not really matter if it will be defined 50/2 or 50/3 - in any case, the AVC will not be applied to these lines. It's not even necessary to define a separate commitment item for these G/Ls; it's possible to define one dummy commitment item for all transactions which are not relevant for budget activities.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Badi for IW31 to keep check on Funds Center and Settlement rule

    Hi,
    My requirement is that While running IW31,if the first four characters of Settlement Rule(Cost Center) and FundsCenter is not equal to Planning Plant then an error message should be raised . Can you suggest any appropriate BADI or User Exit for this?
    Path for Funds Center-->Go to>Assignment--->Funds Management
    Thanks
    K Srinivas

    Hii Srinivas,
    Did you find any solution for this, i am also encountering the same problem.
    Regards,
    meenakshi

  • Tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items

    Hello Experts,
    I need help in finding the tables related to PM order for actual and commitment items.
    I need develop a report which can show the actual and commitment items for each order and Operation/component under that each ITEM wise and its related documents.
    For the component we can find the table RESB.
    But i am getting the difficult to find the data related to Operation (services)
    In my client we can able to see PM orders with activity types and SKF
    How can build the logic to find the values for each operation item and its commitments (PO, PR) and actual that is FI documents
    Please guide me the   TABLES and fields or else give me the hints, how can find the tables
    Thanks and Regards,
    Narendra

    Hi,
    The tables are COEP (actuals) and COOI (commitments); that is if you mean the financial figures.
    Regards,
    Eli

Maybe you are looking for