Wrong VKOA table picked up

Hi
There are two table in VKOA
Table 01 - CustGrp / Material Grp / Acct Ket (access number given is 10)
Table 101 - Sales org / Acct Assg Grp / Acct Assgmnt / Dest Country / Acct Key (access number given is 05)
for Sales order 5560, its booking sales to GL A/c 300000 (given in 01) and not 31000000 (given in 101)
its not picking table 101 inspite access number given is 05 (i,e, before access number 10 for table 01)
All the things like acct assgn grp, acct key are same. Only difference is that the table 101 includes destination country and table 01 does not have destination country. Country is also mentioned in customer master data.
There is some folliowing thing applied in SAP because of which its not picking up. Please let me know what is this and what is the relevance of following
USEREXIT_ACCOUNT_PREP_KOMPCV.
MOVE VBRK-LAND1 TO KOMPCV-ZZLAND.

Hi Deepak,
If the access no is 05 ( Table 101 ), Access no 10 ( Table 01 ).... In this scenario G/L accounts should pick up from the table 101.
1. Kindly check the account assignment groups header and Item level  captured in the Invoice.
2. And check the G/L account determination is maintained as the same account assignment groups ( Customer and Material ) in VKOA.
3. Still have the issue then check the revenue account determination analysis from the Invoice..
Kindly let us know the status.
Regards,
SK

Similar Messages

  • Wrong condition table for condition type

    Hi,
    I have a big problem during pricing. while creating the sales order the system takes the wrong condition table for the specified condition type (I have created a new condition table and changed the access seq, did the initial load and in customizing everything looks fine). To picture the customing i have created ZXXX access seq with a 901 cindition table (sales org, dist ch. and product hierarchy 2 with a standard field PRODH2) unfortunately I had to change the field to ZPRODH2 I decided to create a new table 902 with the Z field. The new access seq has now 902 table in customizing. In CRM the two condition tables and view exists for 901 and 902. Acording to customizing the system should take the 902 condition table but insteed he takes the old 901 which shouldn't be used.
    Do anybody has some ideas why the system responds like that ? I have tried to delete the old table with the standard report and it didn't worked.
    What can I do ?
    Thanks for some ideas !!
    BR
    Tomasz

    Hi Tomasz
    Please check assignment of that new access seq to c.type in v/06
    That table might hv used somewhere in another acc.seq so unable to delelte
    Regards
    Sachin

  • Wrong VBAP table updation

    Hi
    Facing a problem with wrong VBAP table updation.
    Sales order shows Business Area" A " at both header and Item Level but in VBAP table the business area updated is " B ". can't understand why it is happening.
    Changelog doesn't indicate anything
    Thanks and regards
    Nikhil

    Hi,
    Can you check how the business rule that is assigned at SPRO-> Sales and distribution -> basic functions -> Account assignment/Costing -> Business area account assignment?
    Regards

  • Wrong GL account picked up by system..thus no posting

    Hi,
    I am testing one standard sales cycle.After finishing everything when I try to release billing document, it gives me following error:
    G/L account 889000 is not defined in company code 9999(it's the C Code i defined)
    Message no. F5506
    Diagnosis
    The G/L account 889000 was not found in company code 9999.
    It looks everything okay but am I missing anything here as system is picking up wrong GL account.It is 'Other sales deductions' and ideally it should have picked up Sales revenues - domestic.
    I have rechecked all the relevant account group settings.
    Can you suggest as what could be the reason ?
    Is anything I am supposed to check ?
    regards,
    manOO

    Hi,
      Your question always is eligible in some cases. Of course you can have a look on VKOA or some account determination configurations. But my additional explaination is there are some more processes which are interphere into the hole process of posting, like user exist program...
       Some those programs will make additional change or adding more line item into your SAP standard accounting document. What happen if the new line items consist of new GL accounts which are not exist in your company code level chart account.
        This is very common when you have global rolling out, and missing in creating GL in company code account level is always common happening.
    Any further need in clarification please feel free to call me 084-9 03 109 793 or email [email protected]
    Rdgrs,

  • Wrong Tax clasification picking at sales order

    Dear All
    I have mantained conditions like
    Example
    JLST=Tax clasification catagory  0-Nil Tax,1-Full tax 12.5%,2-4% tax against declaration
    JCST-Tax clasification catagory  0-Nil Tax,1-Full tax 8%,2- 4% tax against declaration
    I mantained at Customer master Billing tab like
    JCST-2- 4% tax against declaration
    JLST-1-Full tax 12.5%,
    Also I mantained Condition Record for countyRegion of Del PlantRegion of CustomerTax cal of customer tax cal of material master for all combination
    When i m doing sales order system is picking the combination for JLST which is right but System should pick the Tax clasification from customer-JLST-1-Full tax 12.5%,where it is picking 2-4% tax against declaration.
    What is the reason behind? where my sold party is same as ship to party.
    Please help this solution.
    Regards
    Sahoo

    Hi,
    If you are maintaining the same field combinations for both access sequences JLST&JCST, then change the field combinations as follows
    Create a new condition table for a new access sequence for the combination of
    Country/PlntRegion/Region/TaxCl2Cust/TaxCl.2Mat for CST.
    and for VAT maintain the same 368 table with the acess seq of JLST. And create two condition records for JLST&JCST condition types.
    In customer master if the customer is relevant for VAT(Local sales) then put appropriate indicator of JLST(maintain JCST indicator=0(Nil tax)) . Similarly if the customer is from some other state the put relevant tax indicator for JCST.(here, JLST=0(nil)
    I hope u have maintained Material master tax indicators for both JCST&JLST.
    Hope this will solve ur issue.
    JJ
    Edited by: Jagsap on Apr 15, 2009 8:48 AM

  • Wrong URL is picked

    HI Experts,
    I have a problem, i am posting in this forum too.
    I am on Ep6.0 SP20. and trying to implement leave request. Necessary workflow templates are activated.,
    in swfvisu, checked the launching of each task.
    I see the entries for approval task:
    Application: LeaveRequestApprover
    Package: sap.com/ess~lea
    Somehow on portal, when trying to launching the task in UWL, a wrong application parameter is picked. i found this through HTTP watcher.
    correct URL: https://<host>.<company.com>:50000/webdynpro/dispatcher/sap.com/ess~lea/LeaveRequestApprover
    URL being Picked:
    http://<host>.<company.com>:50000/webdynpro/dispatcher/*com.sap.xss.hr.lea.appl/*LeaveRequestApprover
    The application "com.sap.xss.hr.lea.appl" does not exist at all.
    Can any body help me where can i control and make the portal pick the right application.
    Regards!

    I have tried the note before, I have done except registering the items with UWL in portal.
    I have done that too now.
    when i execute the task on portal, it seems the browser has a problem running Java Script.
    This is the URL that I am seeing now:
    https://<host>.<port>/irj/portalapps/com.sap.portal.epcf.loader/script/standard/js13_epcf.js?6.0801

  • Wrong PAyment Term Picked During MIRO

    Hello,
    I have an issue,
    1) I create PO .
    2) Then do MIGO and assign DELIVERY NOTE Feild .
    3) Then Further I create a MIRO giving DELIVERY NOTE feild as 'PO REFRERNCE' .
    NOw During MIRO its picking Wrong PAYMENT TERM.
    I checked Vendor master for PAYMENT TERM its maintained properly.
    I even checked OBB8 for proper assignment of Payment Terms.
    Eg For Vendor -123 Payment Term assigned is '3000'
    in PO its picking 3000
    but During MIRO it gives Incorrect Value '9000'
    Kindly suggest.
    Thanks & Regards,

    In MRM_PAYMENT_TERM
    Payment term feild (ZTERM) is not Export parameter,how can we Use this..
    It picks wrong payment term when Delivery note is selected During MIRO for 'PO Reference'
    If he uses PO number it gives correct payment term..
    Regards,

  • Wrong unit quantities picked in invoices for the material

    hi
    I have completed a sales cycle for a particular material.
    now when i see the Scheduling agreement the quantities in unit(Kg) is perfect but in Invoice the quantity displayed is very very high.
    I have checked the master data for the material, and also checked all the conversion rules applied for the material.
    but it is perfect.
    I checked some other scheduling agreement for the same material and completed the sales cycle it works perfect.
    Can anybody guide me from where do this wrong quantities in the Invoice is picked up.
    regards
    S.C

    Dear,
    Please check material master data with MM03.
    Check gross unit and it's unit of measure.
    net unit and  it's unit of measure,
    Volume and  it's unit of measure.
    Go in additional data and also check gross weight, height and length.
    Regards,
    Mahesh Wagh

  • Wrong create table query in informix 11.50

    hello, toplink is generating the wrong query to create the table (google translate)
    example:
    database: informix 11.50 (Windows 32)
    @Entity
    public class User {
         @Id
         @GeneratedValue(strategy=IDENTITY)
         private Long id;
    Generated query:
    CREATE TABLE USUARIO (ID NUMERIC(19) SERIAL NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (ID))
    This is wrong. Informix does't support "NUMERIC(19) SERIAL" syntax.
    Thanks.

    Please log a bug in eclipse bugzilla and provide the correct sql.

  • Wrong profit center picked during return GR

    Dear Experts,
    I'm doing purchase return process. Thus I created PO & then return material via MIGO by using movement type 161. I noticed that wrong profit center that system picked under account assignment tab in MIGO. This profit center field is grayed out so I couldn't change to correct profit center during MIGO .
    Let me understand where the system picked the profit center because there is no account assignment tab exist in said PO. So I unable to check where the prfit center come from. Or how may I check this in configuration path.
    Please understand me how the profile center play his role during PO & MIGO creation. Thank you.
    rgds,
    nantha

    Dear Experts,
    Yes I noticed the profit center. So system picked from master data when we perform GR. I noticed that the same profit center in sales general/plant in material master. Appreciate if you could tell me what is the different mainting in both field.
    rgds,
    nantha

  • Wrongly updated table data

    Dear Sir,
    Accidentally, Data is updated wrongly in production server and that table is enabled by CDC.
    Is there any mechanism to restore point in time without restore fullback.
    Cheers,

    you can use CDC table to reverse engineer and get the data but it  can get ugly if you several other changes happening alongside on the same columns. you may also have lost updates..
    be carefull...
    if you do not want to do full restore,. take a snapshot of the CDC table and  test if you can reverse engineer..as i said, i can get messy, depending how complex the envirnoment..
    if all this is done in one transaction, you get the value before and revert it to it if that column was not subsequently changed(which will also be logged in the CDC table) but is the subsequent modification on the column supposed to be modified or was modified
    because of the wrong value...so, you see how it is turning to be messy..
    Hope it Helps!!

  • Wrong Document typed picked in ECC  Intermediate during CRM invoice Cancel.

    Dear SAP,
    When we cancel an CRM invoice(1159980135) from CP1 (CRM System) FI
    entry(1102100182)in ECC has been posted with AB document type instead
    of RV document type, and
    also system has picked posting key 12(Credit Memo) Instead if 11
    (Reversal Invoice).
    This kind of issue happened twice from last month. it is happening some of the documents we do not have any clue for whihc document and happing intermediately.
    We tried to reproduce the same scenario in our quality system(CT1) but
    FI entry is getting posted with correct document type RV and posting
    key 11.
    Attached screen shots from (CP1) CRM system for your reference.
    Let me know if you need additional information for analysis.
    If reqire send us the Email i will attache the custmization sceen shots
    Regards,
    Prakesh

    Hi SF,
       Most of the times document flow will not be updated in CRM, if any inbound queues are not processed completely in CRM.  This issue happens, when billing document is created in ECC and at that time if some one is in change mode of the order, inbound queue fails with status SYSFAIL.
       Please look into the inbound queues in CRM, release if any queues are failed. 
    Regards,
    Bhanu

  • Captivate 4 - Go back a screen and Wrong answer wont pick up

    Captivate 4 is driving me mad !
    Got a large course in Cap 4, system training, theres various click area interactions.
    If i preview the slides in Captivate or publish it i get the same bug...
    I'm asked to click on a button, i click away and get the wrong answer feedback. All fine, i click on the button and i move to the next screen.
    If i then click on back to go to the previous slide, if i try to click away to get the wrong answer it never comes up.  The hotspot is there so if i click on the button which its over i can go forward.  But for some reason the wrong answer feedback never appears a second time.
    I've deleted it, added a new one, same as before, just W/A feedback, checked to 'infinite attempts' but it only seems to appear once.  If i go back to the page and get the wrong answer nothing !
    Got a major deadline coming up soon, dont expect this basic bug to be appearing, never had these problems in Cap 3.
    Arrgh.  Any ideas ?

    Not sure that I can help on this, but I have a general clue.
    In general, you must go forward to go backward when scoring.  The <BACK button is not what I am referring to.  Try an interim slide that is AFTER your scored interaction.  It might provide a message like:  Thank you for trying, but your answer was not correct on the first try.  Click Continue to review that concept again...     CONTINUE
    The Continue button is the link back with the GoTo feature of the button.
    You can also GoTo slides before the interaction to prep them.
    I am not sure about this for interactions (it is true for Quizzes)... Use Must take Quiz to Continue should be enabled for Quizzes in the global settings.
    Hope this helps
    Joe C.

  • Wrong Work center picking up Time sheet

    Hi
    Scenario is as follows:
    Earlier Employee has HR assignment to one Work center 1 -WC1
    Later, Employee was Assigned to Work center 2- WC2
    Problem: When booking time sheet in CAT2 ,  for service order, WC1 was picking up, even though in Service order WC2 is assigned.
    We have deleted the Employee HR assignment from WC1 , but still in Time sheet WC1 is coming.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks.

    Is it possible for anyone to tell, from where the work center is being picked up in CAT2. We are processing time sheet booking for service order. The work center in service order is something different than what is picked up in CAT2.

  • Bug or am I doing it wrong? (Table of Contents)

    One table of contents works fine for my thesis, but then I try to add a list of figures. I insert the table of contents, the instant that I change anything about it in the Inspector, the first table of contents gets changed too. I can't figure out how to disjoin them, they are obviously two different objects, but the Inspector seems not to be able to tell them apart.

    Pages appears to allow a single, unified TOC. I think Apple Feedback would be a good place to go to ask to include a feature that allows separate list for tables, figures, charts, etc.
    Terry

Maybe you are looking for