XML shows multiple po distributions account for each po line item

Question

Hi, We have custome RDF created for Purchase Order Detail Report. Per the PO summary report, PO nubmer 30367 has two lines and each on has single distributions. Each line has different distributions. Line 1distribution account: 01.000.105.65020.00000.00 and Line 2 distribution account: 01.000.000.15020.00000.00. However when I run the XML for PO summary report, each line items contains the two account distributions. How do you make it sho it only show the account distribution pertain to the each line?
**Please see xml below.**
- <LIST_G_COMPANY>
- <G_COMPANY>
<C_COMPANY>CTI US Ledger</C_COMPANY>
<C_ORGANIZATION_ID>83</C_ORGANIZATION_ID>
<GL_CURRENCY>USD</GL_CURRENCY>
<STRUCTURE_ACC>101</STRUCTURE_ACC>
<STRUCTURE_CAT>101</STRUCTURE_CAT>
<C_YES>Yes</C_YES>
<C_NO>No</C_NO>
<C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>1</C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>
<BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>0</BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>
- <LIST_G_HEADERS>
- <G_HEADERS>
<POH_REMARKS />
<CREATION_DATE>01-SEP-10</CREATION_DATE>
<STATUS>Approved</STATUS>
<REV>0</REV>
<PRINTED_DATE />
<TYPE>Standard Purchase Order</TYPE>
<BUYER>BUNTING, DOUGLAS</BUYER>
<C_CURRENCY>USD</C_CURRENCY>
<VENDOR>Softchoice Corporation</VENDOR>
<ACCEPTANCE_DATE />
<ON_HOLD />
<VENDOR_SITE>SOFTCHOICE - PO</VENDOR_SITE>
<ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>No</ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR>
<PO_HEADER_ID1>2790</PO_HEADER_ID1>
<REVISED_DATE />
<PO_NUMBER>30367</PO_NUMBER>
<C_FND_PRECISION>2</C_FND_PRECISION>
- <LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>1</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>Test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>500</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>2</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>1000</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
</LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>2,500.00</C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>
</G_HEADERS>
</LIST_G_HEADERS>
</G_COMPANY>
</LIST_G_COMPANY>
<XCOMPANY_NAME>CTI US Ledger</XCOMPANY_NAME>
<YES>Yes</YES>
<NO>No</NO>
<ORG_ID>83</ORG_ID>
<CAT_ID>1</CAT_ID>
<COUNT_RECORDS>1</COUNT_RECORDS>
</XXCTI_POXPOSTD_1>
**Here is the Query for the RDF file...**
SELECT pol.line_num Line
, pol.closed_flag Line_Closed
, pol.cancel_flag Line_Cancel
, pol.closed_code
, plt.line_type Line_Type
, &P_FLEX_CAT C_FLEX_CAT
, &P_FLEX_ITEM C_FLEX_ITEM
, pol.item_revision Rev
, pol.item_description Item_Description
, pol.unit_meas_lookup_code Unit
, pol.note_to_vendor Note_to_Vendor
/* Bug: 141118 Take unit price from PO_LINES if there is no shipment */
, to_number(decode(plt.order_type_lookup_code,
'AMOUNT',null,
nvl(pll.price_override,pol.unit_price))) Unit_Price
, hrl.location_code Ship_To_Location
, pll.promised_date Promised_Date
, pll.need_by_date Need_By_Date
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Ordered
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Received
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Cancelled
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)),
:p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Due
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Billed
, pol.po_header_id
FROM po_line_locations pll
, mtl_system_items msi
, mtl_categories mca
, po_lines pol
, po_line_types plt
, hr_locations hrl
WHERE
ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) > 0
AND (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount), NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)),:p_qty_precision)) > (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision))
AND pol.item_id = msi.inventory_item_id(+)
AND nvl(msi.organization_id,:c_organization_id) = :c_organization_id
AND pol.line_type_id = plt.line_type_id
AND pol.category_id = mca.category_id
/* Bug No 141118
Added the outer join on po_line_id ,hrl.location_id and nvl on the shipment_type
Also added nvl on quantity and price so as to select quantity and price if the PO
has no shipments */
AND pol.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id(+)
AND pll.ship_to_location_id = hrl.location_id(+)
AND pll.shipment_type in ('STANDARD', 'PLANNED')
AND &P_WHERE_CAT
AND &P_WHERE_ITEM
ORDER BY pol.line_num

Answer 1

> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but  the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.