Yosemite does not look right

This is the only way I can think to title this. I downloaded Yosemite and it crashed my computer so I had to do a complete system repair with the help of apple. Thank goodness I have applecare. Anyway after going through all of that we restored from my back up so everything looks just like it did before I installed Yosemite. All the icons are the same, nothing has changed. But according to the computer I'm running Yosemite. Shouldn't it look different? Also I don't have anything like the handoff icon that everyone keeps mentioning. And when my iPhone rings it definitely does not show up on my iMac even though I have made sure all of my accounts are the same - they always have been. None of the features that Yosemite are supposed to have appear to be on my machine. HELP!.

Similar Messages

Date time picker script does not look right when calender pops up

When I use this script in my header, my date time picker does not look right. The pop up calender works but the layout is off, here is the code I am adding to my header:
<link href="http://netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/twitter-bootstrap/2.2.2/css/bootstrap-combined.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
    <link rel="style.css" type="text/css" media="screen"
     href="http://tarruda.github.com/bootstrap-datetimepicker/assets/css/bootstrap-datetimepicker.min .css">
And here is the code I am adding to the body of the html page below: Is it the placement of the code in the header? I've tried the beginning and the end of the hearder but no difference. Thanks for your time on this....
<div id="datetimepicker" class="input-append date">
<input type="text"></input>
<span class="add-on">
<i data-time-icon="icon-time" data-date-icon="icon-calendar"></i>
</span>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.3/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/twitter-bootstrap/2.2.2/js/bootstrap.min.js">
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://tarruda.github.com/bootstrap-datetimepicker/assets/js/bootstrap-datetimepicker.min. js">
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://tarruda.github.com/bootstrap-datetimepicker/assets/js/bootstrap-datetimepicker.pt-B R.js">
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$('#datetimepicker').datetimepicker({
format: 'MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss',
language: 'en'
</script>

Page is not up yet, can I attach the html to this forum? I'l cut and paste the html below, thanks
<!DOCTYPE html>




 <html class="no-js"> 
<head>

<link href="http://netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/twitter-bootstrap/2.2.2/css/bootstrap-combined.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
    <link rel="style.css" type="text/css" media="screen"
     href="http://tarruda.github.com/bootstrap-datetimepicker/assets/css/bootstrap-datetimepicker.min .css">
      
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    
    <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge,chrome=1">
    
    <title>Hawaii Beach Weddings</title>
    <meta name="description" content="">
     
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width">
    <link href="style.css" rel="stylesheet">
    
    <link href="//fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:400italic,700italic,400,700|Merriweathe r:400,700,900" rel="stylesheet">
    
        <script src="js/modernizr-2.6.1.min.js"></script>
    <script src="js/modernizr-2.6.1.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
    
    
    <header id="master-header" class="clearfix" role="banner">
        <hgroup>
            <h1 id="site-title"><a href="index.html" title="Your Site Name">Hawaii Beach Weddings</a></h1>
            <h1 id="site-title2"><a href="index.html" title="Your Site Name">xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</a></h1>
            <h2 id="site-description">Where the Sun, Sand and Love come together...</h2>
        </hgroup>
    </header> 
<div id="main" class="row">
    
    <nav class="main-navigation span12 clearfix" role="navigation">
        <h3 class="assistive-text">Main menu</h3>
        <ul>
            <li><a href="index.html">Home</a></li>
            <li class="current">
                <a href="about.html">About</a>
                <ul class="sub-menu">
                    <li><a href="http://www.google.com">Subpage 1</a></li>
                    <li><a href="#">Subpage 2</a></li>
                </ul>
            </li>
            <li><a href="contact.html">FAQ's</a></li>
        </ul>
    </nav> 
<div id="content" role="main" class="span12">
    <article class="page hentry">
        <header class="entry-header">
            <h1 class="entry-title">Simple Beach Weddings</h1>
        </header> 
        <div class="entry-content">
            <p>We specialize in simplicity for your beach wedding. Let us keep it simple by offering what you need to make your beach wedding easy </p>
            
            <section id="typography">
                <h1>I am first a photographer who loves to<small></small>capture "the moment."</h1>
                <p>By organizing Hawaii Beach Weddings, I have allowed myself to do what I do best: capture your moment. I use industry professionals to make a sometimes stressful event easy. By keeping it to a few simple choices: A Minister (necessary), Flowers, Music, Video, Chairs (optional), I have allowed you to quickly design your wedding event and enjoy your stay in the islands. </p>
                    <div class="row">
                        <div class="span7">
                            <h2>Ministers:</h2>
                            <h3>Reverand Robert Hoyt</h3>
                                            <p> </p>
                        </div>
                </div>
                  <h2> </h2>
                    <div class="row"></div>
                    <div class="row">
              </div>
                <h2> </h2>
            </section>
            <section id="tables">
              <div class="row">
              </div> 
            </section> 
            
            <section id="forms">
                <h1>Let's begin with your contact information.</h1>
                <form class="row">
                    <fieldset class="span5">
                      <p>
                        <label>Name
                          <input type="text" required></label></p>
                          <br>
                          <p><label>Phone number with area code <input type="text" pattern="\d{5}(-\d{4})?" title="a US Zip code, with or without the +4 exension" placeholder=" 123-456-7891"></label></p>
                          <br>
                          <p>
                          <label>Email
                          <input type="email"></label></p>
                          <br>
                          <h1>Where would you like your wedding to be?</h1>
             <p><label>Honolulu (South Oahu)<input type="radio" name="rad"></label></p>
             <p><label>Waimanalu (East Oahu) <input type="radio" name="rad"></label></p>
                <br>
                <h1>What date & time would you like to have your wedding?</h1>
                 
                      <div id="datetimepicker" class="input-append date">
      <input type="text"></input>
      <span class="add-on">
        <i data-time-icon="icon-time" data-date-icon="icon-calendar"></i>
      </span>
    </div>
    <script type="text/javascript"
     src="http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.3/jquery.min.js">
    </script>
    <script type="text/javascript"
     src="http://netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/twitter-bootstrap/2.2.2/js/bootstrap.min.js">
    </script>
    <script type="text/javascript"
     src="http://tarruda.github.com/bootstrap-datetimepicker/assets/js/bootstrap-datetimepicker.min. js">
    </script>
    <script type="text/javascript"
     src="http://tarruda.github.com/bootstrap-datetimepicker/assets/js/bootstrap-datetimepicker.pt-B R.js">
    </script>
    <script type="text/javascript">
      $('#datetimepicker').datetimepicker({
        format: 'MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss',
        language: 'en'
    </script>
    <br>
                     <h1>What type of flowers would you like to have?</h1>
                     <p>
                            <label>Bouquet<br>
                                <select>
                                    <option>None</option>
                                    <option>Red roses</option>
                                    <option>White roses</option>
                                    <option>Hibiscus</option>
                                </select>
                            </label>
                        <p>
                            <label>Flowers<br>
                                <select>
                                    <option>None</option>
                                    <option>Roses</option>
                                    <option>Orchids</option>
                                    <option>Hibiscus</option>
                                </select>
                            </label>
                              <h1>What type of Leis would you like to have?</h1>
                            <label>Leis<br>
                                <select>
                                    <option>None</option>
                                    <option>Kukui nut (male)</option>
                                    <option>Orchids (inexpensive)</option>
                                    <option>Stephanotus (sweet smelling</option>
                                </select>
                            </label>
</fieldset>
<fieldset class="span4">
                      <p>
                       
                        <p>
                           <label>Music<br>
                                <select>
                                    <option>None</option>
                                    <option>solo singer with ukulele</option>
                                    <option>solo singer with guitar</option>
                                    <option>solo guitar instrumental</option>
                                    <option>small ensemble</option>
                                </select>
                            </label>
                          <br>
                          <label for="s">Number of Chairs</label><p>
                            <select id="s">
                                <option>none</option>
                                <option>1</option>
                                <option>2</option>
                                <option>3</option>
                                <option>4</option>
                                <option>5</option>
                                <option>6</option>
                                <option>7</option>
                                <option>8</option>
                            </select>
                        </p>
                        <p>
                          <label for="t">Notes</label> <textarea id="t" cols="30" rows="5">Textarea text</textarea></p>
                    </fieldset>
            
        </div> 
    </article> 
</div> 
</div> 
    <footer id="footer" role="contentinfo">
        
    </footer> 
    
    <script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js"></script>
    <script>window.jQuery || document.write('<script src="js/jquery-1.7.2.min.js"><\/script>')</script>
    
    <script src="js/script.js"></script>
</body>
</html>

Exported Video Does Not Look Right

I am sure this is a basic setting I am overlooking, but a lot of this is new to me - any help would be GREATLY appreciated.
My goal is to create a high quality 640x480 movie for Computer/Web viewing only.
• I shot a short video using a Canon Vixia HV30 to mini DV tape using the SD standard - no problem. I guess that records at 720x480 non-square pixels at 29.97fps - is that right?
• I used log and capture inside of FCP v6.0.5 to capture the various clips I needed - no problem (I don't think). If I open each of those clips from the finder in Quicktime they look "pretty" good, but a bit of aliasing on the diagonals and somewhat blurry, but not sure why? Everything looks sharp on the smaller camera LCD screen? and looks pretty good inside of FCP on the Canvas? If I open one of these captures directly inside of Quicktime and do a get info, it says...
DV 720x480 (640x480)
FPS: 29.95
Normal Size: 640x480 pixels
Current Size: 640x480 pixels (Actual)
All these Quicktime movies appear slightly larger in height and width than the same clips when viewed in the FCP Canvas?
If I open the Sequence Settings in FCP it says...
Frame Size 720 x 480 NTSC DV (3:2)
Pixel Aspect Ratio NTSC - CCIR 601 /DV (720x480)
Field Dominance: None
Editing Timebase: 29.97
Everything looked pretty good inside FCP so I Exported a QT Movie using "Current Settings". Then opened the resulting self-contained movie in QT and it looks pretty bad. When I get info in QT on the rendered final movie it reads...
DV 720x480 (640x480)
FPS: 29.97
Normal Size: 720x480 pixels
Current Size: 640x480 pixels (Actual)
So... the FPS and the Normal Size are not the same as the captured original clips.
Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong?
Is this just the wrong Sequence Settings, Export Settings or do I have to start over an re-capture all my footage some other way?
PS - I am assuming that the DV Camcorder is recording interlaced (60 fields) rather than progressive - is that right. Do I need to de-interlace the video somehow?
Message was edited by: ChoreoGraphics

I'm far from being an expert, but since no one has replied to you yet, and because I've been helped out here plenty of times, I'll post something and who knows -- it may be the answer.
Your post was really long but from what I can gather, you're wondering why your exported video does not look good when you open it in QuickTime. Try this: Open the video in QT, hit command-J, then click on Video Track, then at the bottom right (under Visual Settings) you'll see High Quality, Single Field, and Deinterlace. Click around on those to see if that improves what you see.

I have today purchased iMovie but does not look right

I have today purchased iMovie for £2.99 (through iTunes I recall) but when I start the app it does not look much like the on line tutorial details. Just has Video/Projects/Theater and create a new project. Any advice please? Have I actually purchased the app or some simple equivalent?

Thanks for your time. I have another response which has clarified my situation. I have the right app for an iPad, which is not so comprehensive as the version for a MAC. I have also found some learning material for the iPad version, which matches what I have, so all is resolved. Thanks!

Tried the fix from last contact and still does not look right.

I tried the fix that you recommended and that had no effect. The colors on some web sites are off to the point that I can not read the material since the colors are so dark or even one site came up with an all black background that I never had that before on that site. Some sites are scrambled so much that it shows the site as an outline looks when writing a paper. On Monzilla, when you click on; i.e., 'cut' the bar highlights but the writing on the bar becomes so faint that you can not make it out. I never had this problem until I allowed the latest version to load. I also shut down the computer but that had no effect. If I look for something and use Yahoo it comes up with writing over writing on some lines. So why did this occur?

That's consistent with trouble with the Segoe UI fonts on your system.
If you're using Windows XP or Windows Vista, try Vortical's technique from the following post:
Re: iTunes 10.1 Missing Text
But if you're using Windows 7, try itunesTRK's suggestion from the following post:
menu bar invisible

Website does not look right

Yesterday, firefox updated. I don't know what the update was, but now iGoogle looks horrible with missing images & basic text.
Here is an image. Any help would be great.
[http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg228/crashinc25/iGoogle.jpg ScreenPrint of iGoogle]

Reload web page(s) and bypass the cache.
* Press and hold Shift and left-click the Reload button.
* Press "Ctrl + F5" or press "Ctrl + Shift + R" (Windows,Linux)
* Press "Cmd + Shift + R" (MAC)
Make sure that you allow pages to choose their colors and that you haven't enabled High Contrast in the Windows Accessibility settings.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Website_colors_are_wrong
Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

My iTunes does not look right at all. The buttons are blank. I have tried to install a previous version and I get the same thing. I have Windows 7 Professional 64 bit.

imageshack.com/i/0e8s53p

That's consistent with trouble with the Segoe UI fonts on your system.
If you're using Windows XP or Windows Vista, try Vortical's technique from the following post:
Re: iTunes 10.1 Missing Text
But if you're using Windows 7, try itunesTRK's suggestion from the following post:
menu bar invisible

Shooting "squeezed" 16:9 does not look quite right when exported to 16:9

Hard to put a title which would cover the problem well, probably hard to describe it well, too, for an amateur:)
Anyway, I have a cheap JVC GR-D320E which serves me well as a beginner´s camera (for the price I gave) but when I shoot in what it calls 16:9 mode which I have understood it is not true 16:9 but in a way squeezed, and I import this to FCE (set to Anamorphic PAL), it all looks good within FCE but when I export it using QT Conversions and setting the proportions and size manually to what is supposed to be the right dimensions for 16:9 PAL (1024x576 if I remember it correctly) it does not look right. The persons "grow shorter and fatter", if you know what I mean.
I have tried to change the dimensions in QT Pro, but the problem is to find the correct ones. I also wonder why this happens and if there actually are "correct" proportions which then would be something between 16:9 and 4:3 or if I am doing something wrong?
When I export not using QT Conversions, the result is 4:3 which isn´t right, either...
Well, hope I have been able to describe this in a way which is possible to understand...

I want to export it for several purposes; all you mention, in fact; to put on the web, to play on the monitor and to make a DVD. As I mentioned, when I exported as a QuickTime movie, it came out as a 4:3 and that of course, looked awful.
Using the conversions, I can scale it as I want to, but to me 16:9 does not look exactly right, either. That is why I wanted to know if there are some proportions in between the 4:3 and 16:9 which is appropriate for footage which is not filmed in true 16:9 but in this option which cheaper cameras have.
The article you linked to, did not tell anything new, alas.

Yosemite does not recognize scanner

I have a MacBook Pro 6,2 (2.4 Ghz i5 and 8 Gb RAM) and I have just installed Yosemite 10.10.2. I am testing it carefully to make sure all of the applications that I need are properly supported. Yosemite does not see either of my scanners. I have 2 scanners; an Epson Perfection V600 Photo and an older HP Scanjet 5590. System Preferences does not see either scanner and I cannot, therefore, add them. I have downloaded and installed the latest driver and software from Epson. To test the scanners, I connect them directly to the MacBook Pro via USB. Adobe Acrobat Pro 9 does see the Epson scanner in the "select device" dialog that follows "Create PDF->From Scanner->Select Device" dialogs, but then returns an error stating is cannot communicate with the device. Acrobat Pro 9 does not see the HP at all. Image Capture does not see either scanner. Both printers (HP LaserJet 2035 and HP OfficeJet 8100) are visible and work properly, connected through my home network (Mac Pro wired, MacBook Pro and MacBook Air wireless), both are connected via USB
My intention is make sure all of my existing hardware and software works as it should in Yosemite before I upgrade my Mac Pro desktop (still on 10.8.5 Mountain Lion). I cannot risk killing the whole thing. And I am not a Macintosh neophyte; I still have my old Mac Plus in a box in the garage and I have relied on Macintosh since 1986.
Is there some installation or configuration detail that I am missing?
Jeff

jeffb996 wrote:
Does anyone from Apple actually look at this stuff?
No.
If I had an answer for you, I would have suggested one. I'm interested too, so I subscribed to this thread.
Having nothing particularly useful to contribute, did you try resetting the printing system?
Mac OS X: How to reset the printing system
A quick search of this site yielded some similar questions, including the suggestion to use the following driver:
http://www.ellert.se/twain-sane/
Try that.

My Firefox screen at the top does not look like what you show at your help site, so I can't customize or learn how to do things

I am running Windows 7 Professional and am not adept at using the Windows platform. Firefox on my computer does not look the way it is shown at specific "Help" topic pages, so I can't get the help needed. Three examples: 1. How to click on a link so it opens in a new tab; 2. How to customize the options; 3. How to get rid of the "Ask" web site window.

On Windows, you can switch between a classic menu bar and a compact menu opened with an orange button with the word Firefox.
You can switch between these using one of these methods:
* right-click a blank area of the tab bar and turn Menu Bar on or off
* View menu > Toolbars > Menu Bar
* orange Firefox button > Options triangle > Menu Bar
Does that help?
To get to the tab preferences, you can do this:
orange Firefox button (or Tools menu) > Options > Tabs
To remove the Ask toolbar, you can go here:
orange Firefox button (or Tools menu) > Add-ons > Extensions category
You might still have to do a little cleanup after removing an extension, if it changed your home page, new tab page, search provider, etc. Please describe any remaining problems in more detail.
Hope this helps.

My Ref. HD does not look like my Aperture Library

Hi,
I don't neccessarily have a problem, but I do notice that my referenced library on an ext. HD does not look like my Aperture library on my mbp. I notice that there are alot of separate images not in albums or projects or folders. Is there a way or need to reorganize the ref. images into a similar setup as my library. Any thoughts are welcome as I'm a bit of a neat freak, esp. with photos etc.
Thank you.
John

OK we're talking past each other here and not getting much accomplished.
The top screenshot from this post Re: My Ref. HD does not look like my Aperture Library is not from within Aperture. How did you take that screenshot? Aperture does not display dates like that AFAIK, that sure looks like a Finder window.
I believe the best thing you can do right now is to read the User Manual, especially the part about the parts of the Aperture library and Kirby's very good user tip. It should clear up your terminology and make things clearer for you.
good luck
regards
To better explain my point. This is what a screenshot of an Aperture Library would look like from within Aperture
This is a screnhsot of a Finder window
Message was edited by: Frank Caggiano - added screenshots

My interface -- buttons (back, forward, reload), firefox tab, groups, etc. -- does not look like the sample on your "firefox features" page. ("Groups" seems not to function at all.) I'm running the current firefox 4 download on Windows XP. Can you help?

My interface -- buttons (back, forward, reload), firefox tab, groups, etc. -- does not look like the sample on your "firefox features" page. ("Groups" seems not to function at all.) I'm running the current firefox 4 download on Windows XP. Can you help?

cor-el
Thank you for your swift reply. I don't know that this has helped me, as I've reached my level of tolerance for fooling with this annoying little problem - for today anyway. It has been going on since I "up" graded to Firefox 4. My wife is running 3.6.x on her laptop with none of this foolishness. As BLASPHEMOUS as it may sound, I've gone back to IE for the time being even though I don't like it 1000th as much as I do Firefox.
Not just to rant here, I would say that I found a way to put some buttons on the right side of the toolbar that immediately gave me permission to "back, forward, and reload", but upon closing the browser and going out for dinner with the wife, I find on return that not only are those buttons NOT still on the toolbar, but I can't find them anymore. I think they were in "add-ons" found under I believe Add-On Manager.
I did also manage to achieve back/forward functionality running Firefox in SAFE mode, but this meant no No-Script, among other things, and I've grown too fond of that particular little script to give it up.
I've rebooted, restored, and reinstalled, can't get this formerly completely reliable program to work like it always has. Before looking around on here, I was beginning to think it was my PC.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP, cor-el. I'm going to see if I can get on live chat on Monday.
bossman344

I am using both PSE 13 and Lightroom 5. When I use Lightroom as an external editor and save the photo, it shows up in PSE13 as an edited file but does not look any different. Why doesn't it appear edited?

I am using both PSE 13 and Lightroom 5. When I use Lightroom as an external editor and save the photo, it shows up in PSE13 as an edited file but does not look any different. Why doesn't it appear edited?

People who have Photoshop, but don't have Lightroom, need ACR so that they can use Raw files. Without ACR they could do nothing with those (they may also like having ACR so that they can work on other kinds of image using the same kinds of adjustments and techniques, as are used with Raw files).
People who have Lightroom, can get access to Raw files regardless whether ACR is present or not. They can use Lightroom on other kinds of image also, using the same methods. LR can pass images directly into Photoshop without passing via ACR (or else does so transparently, which amounts to substantially the same thing).
ACR does not, strictly speaking, even need to be installed for this external editing to happen. In fact, not even PS needs to be - since a different image editor can be used instead, while still retaining the Adobe Raw conversion etc.
Lightroom "subcontracts out" specialised external tasks, in this workflow, but is still your "main contractor": the image is otherwise located, viewed, managed, adjusted/presented and output entirely using LR.
So IMO we can divide image processing into:
operations that involve pixels and layers and layer masks and adjustment layers etc (of the kind done inside Photoshop)
operations that involve parametric edits (of the kind done in ACR where you are not using a Lightroom based workflow; otherwise, done inside Lightroom)
When PS is called in, that's because those tasks are impossible or unsuitable to do in Lightroom. But those tasks can't be done in ACR either - by definition, since LR and ACR have exactly the same image processing "feature set".
Lightroom is irrelevant to the Bridge + ACR + PS workflow. This workflow requires both your PS and your ACR to be current enough, to support your Raw format etc.
ACR and Bridge are irrelevant to the LR + (image editor) workflow. It is in this case, only LR which needs to be current enough to support your Raw format etc.
RP

New iPad 2 does not look as good as old ipad?

Just got my iPad 2 and first thing I notice is the screen does not look as good as my old iPad. There's a difference in brightness (dimmer) but that's fine, I just increase the brightness. However, even after adjusting to approx same level of brightness, the iPad 2 still does not look as good. For one thing, there is a yellow cast to the iPad 2, whereas the iPad is more neutral. Also, the iPad 2 feels like it has a haze over it. Somehow I am very aware of looking through a screen, whereas with the iPad it's just sort of not there. It's like there's an extra extra layer on the ipad2. (yes I took the plastic film off, that's not it).
Am I nuts or does anyone else feel this way?

I googled iPad 2 yellow display and it looks like some people have a yellow spot near the edge due to the glue not sufficiently drying. Mine is different; the whole screen is on the yellow side, so white isn't white but a bit yellow. If I tilt it and look at an angle, then white becomes white.
It is apparent you look at it side by side with an iPad 1, but maybe if I didn't have one to compare it, I wouldn't know any differently. I don't know if this is normal for an iPad 2.
I do notice the screen feels different. The iPad screen feels hard, like glass. The iPad 2 screen is softer, more like plastic, which I like, except for the yellow thing.

Why is it that I downloaded Firefox 4.0 but I do not have the orange firefox box in the upper left hand corner of screen. My screen still looks like the old verison of firefox. My screen does not look like the one in the video. looks nothing like the one

My Firefox 4.0 does not look anything like the videos you show about the features of the new Firefox. My screen looks totally different than yours. It does not have the orange box in the upper left hand corner of the screen. My screen still looks like the old version. I have the logo on the top of my screen with Ask a Question a vertical line Firefox Help - Mozilla Firefox.
Under this line I have File, Edit, View, History, Bookmarks, Tools, and Help. Below this line is a tab with Ask a Question Firefox Help and a +. My husbands screen looks identical to the orange Firefox Box in the upper left of screen. I would like my screen to look identical to the ones shown in your videos. I only have one version of Firefox 4.0 my husband does have the Firefox 4.0 plus the Beta version. How do I add the Beta version? I have Windows Vista running systems. Please help. Thank you

You're welcome

Yosemite does not look right

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for