Zone with multiple logical interfaces

Hi,
How can multiple logical network interfaces be added to a running zone?
I have configured and installed a whole root zone with one shared-ip network interface.
Now, I need to add more logical interfaces to the same zone.
On a physical server with a bge interface, I would create a /etc/hostname file for each logical interface such as
$ ls /etc | grep host
hostname.bge0
hostname.bge0:1
hostname.bge0:2
hostname.bge0:3
hostname.bge0:4
hostname.bge1
hostname.bge1:1
hostname.bge1:2
hostname.bge1:3
hostname.bge3
hosts
$How can the above be done for a zone?

Hi
This requires 2 steps. Firstly update your zone configuration to add the logical interface and its associated IP address.
Assuming from below you want the logical interface to be added to bge0 then do the following replacing the zonename and ip address for whatever is appropriate for you.
# zonecfg -z itchyzone
zonecfg:itchyzone1> add net
zonecfg:itchyzone1:net> set address=192.168.1.21
zonecfg:itchyzone1:net> set physical=bge0
zonecfg:itchyzone1:net> end
zonecfg:itchyzone1> exitYou can do the above as many times as you like to create multiple logical interfaces for the zone.
After doing the above you will need to reboot the zone to get the new logical interface.
However if you cant reboot the zone you can plumb a logical interface into the zone by running something similar to the following (change for your zonename, IP etc) from the global zone:
# ifconfig bge0 addif 192.168.1.21 netmask + broadcast + zone itchyzone1 upyou will now have an extra interface in the zone (in this case called itchyzone1). To verify, login to the zone and run ifconfig -a and you will see your new interface.
# zlogin itchyzone1
[Connected to zone 'itchyzone1' pts/4]
Last login: Mon Oct  5 22:24:15 on pts/4
Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.10      Generic January 2005
# ifconfig -a
lo0:1: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1
        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
bge0:2: flags=201000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 index 2
        inet 192.168.1.20 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
bge0:3: flags=201000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 index 2
        inet 192.168.1.21 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255Hope this helps
Martin

Similar Messages

  • EWS complex searchfiltercollection with multiple logical operators

    Hi everyone,
    Can you help me, how to make a searchfiltercollection with multiple logical operators?
    I would like to filter by sender and receiver in that way: (sender1 or sender2) and (receiver1 or receiver2)
    My solution doesnt work:
    //filter email sender
    ArrayList<SearchFilter> filterEmailFromArray = new ArrayList<SearchFilter>();
    filterEmailFromArray.add(new SearchFilter.IsEqualTo(EmailMessageSchema.Sender,new EmailAddress("[email protected]")));
    filterEmailFromArray.add(new SearchFilter.IsEqualTo(EmailMessageSchema.Sender,new EmailAddress("[email protected]")));
    SearchFilter filterEmailFrom = new SearchFilter.SearchFilterCollection(LogicalOperator.Or,filterEmailFromArray);
    //filter email received by
    ArrayList<SearchFilter> filterEmailToArray = new ArrayList<SearchFilter>();
    filterEmailToArray.add(new SearchFilter.IsEqualTo(EmailMessageSchema.ReceivedBy,new EmailAddress("[email protected]")));
    filterEmailToArray.add(new SearchFilter.IsEqualTo(EmailMessageSchema.ReceivedBy,new EmailAddress("[email protected]")));
    SearchFilter filterEmailTo = new SearchFilter.SearchFilterCollection(LogicalOperator.Or,filterEmailToArray);
    //final filter
    ArrayList<SearchFilter> filterExchangeArray = new ArrayList<SearchFilter>();
    filterExchangeArray.add(filterEmailFrom);
    filterExchangeArray.add(filterEmailTo);
    SearchFilter filterExchange = new SearchFilter.SearchFilterCollection(LogicalOperator.And,filterExchangeArray);
    This filter finds me 0 results, what is wrong.
    Thanks in advance

    What version of Exchange are you using ? the following works for me against Exchange Online but only if you use the X500 address of the mailbox rather then the SMTP address eg
    SearchFilter sf1 = new SearchFilter.IsEqualTo(EmailMessageSchema.Sender, new Microsoft.Exchange.WebServices.Data.EmailAddress("[email protected]"));
    SearchFilter sf2 = new SearchFilter.IsEqualTo(EmailMessageSchema.Sender, new Microsoft.Exchange.WebServices.Data.EmailAddress("[email protected]"));
    SearchFilter sfc1 = new SearchFilter.SearchFilterCollection(LogicalOperator.Or) { sf1, sf2 };
    SearchFilter sf3 = new SearchFilter.IsEqualTo(EmailMessageSchema.ReceivedBy , new Microsoft.Exchange.WebServices.Data.EmailAddress("/O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=426976116074436785E74E4DD1C079D9-GSCALES1"));
    SearchFilter sf4 = new SearchFilter.IsEqualTo(EmailMessageSchema.ReceivedBy, new Microsoft.Exchange.WebServices.Data.EmailAddress("/O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=426976116074436785E74E4DD1C079D9-GSCALES2"));
    SearchFilter sfc2 = new SearchFilter.SearchFilterCollection(LogicalOperator.Or) { sf3, sf4 };
    SearchFilter filterExchange = new SearchFilter.SearchFilterCollection(LogicalOperator.And) { sfc1,sfc2, };
    This makes sense as the ReceivedBy property refers to the Mailbox that received the Message not the email address that was used, eg if you have a mailbox with two alias's the ReceivedBy (which relates to the PidTagReceivedByEmailAddress
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/cc839550.aspx ) will always be the primarySMTP of the Mailbox. So why are you trying to use multiple ReceivedBy's ?
    Cheers
    Glen

  • OTV site vlan with multiple overlay interface

    Hi,
    I have an OTV multihoming sites. 2 sites. 2 otv edge device each site.
    and with multiple overlay interface sharing 1 joint interface
    otv edge device connected to multiple VDC.
    each internal / downlink will forward different vlan for each vdc.
    ================================
    example
    int overlay 1
    otv extends-vlan 10
    int overlay 2
      otv extends vlan 20
    int eth 2/1
    description trunk to VDC1
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,100
    int eth 2/2
    description trunk to VDC2
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 20,100
    otv site-vlan 100
    ================================
    i understand that i can only use 1 site vlan.
    so in order for the failover to happen, both eth 2/1 and eth2/2 must fail?
    what if only int eth2/1 fail? will the int overlay 1 failover to secondary otv device?
    thanks,
    ivan

    "So when querying the adjacency server the ED then knows which other ED is within the same site?"
    Yes for the first part of the question, using the site Vlan unique to each site.
    Why do you need a routed link between ED's at local site? You dont need to connect those back-back over L3. Moreover if you want to use it for L3 ADJ over peer-link, you need to make sure that VLAN that you are using is not allowed on the VPC member ports, just on the peer-link, else VPC loop alrorithm will break your traffic.
    Are you planning to use multicast or a Unicast deployment? I remember I tried testing the topology in a POC for one of my customer, things did not work as expected in multicast deployment mode and worked fine in Unicast Adjacency server mode. I need to go back and check my notes on this.
    I would rather have the join-interface go back to a routed core at site rather than back-back connecivity as it opens up the tested Multicast deployment mode.
    Cheers,
    -amit singh

  • Drag Zones with multiple pictures - How to get them to play?

    I have struggled with this program for hours. In previous posting from 2005 people say there was a "bug" in the program so multiple pictures in drag zones would not play? Anyone know if this was fixed? Sure won't play for me and instruction manuals say up to 99 pictures can be dragged into them. If the theme has six drag zones, it plays those six pictures, but no more than that. It's driving me nuts!!!!!

    Hey observe... I am not sure, but are you trying to get the "DROP" zones in your themes to play more than one photo on your menu? (Not sure if Ive misread your question and subsequent replies, but in case I havent):
    If you want the drop zones to play "mini-slideshows" in your menu, you can do this in a couple of different ways. Firstly once youve added your slideshow to your iDVD theme you can then go to menu and press auto fill. This will put your slideshow into each of the drop zones. If you want them to play from different points of the slideshow just press on them and adjust the slider above them to the point where you want them to start. The other way you can do this is to create a mini-slideshow in iPhoto or FotoMagico or iMovie (without audio) for each drop zone and drop them in.

  • Secure zones with multiple passwords

    To many of you experts out there this may be a rather dumb question but I am just trying to get the answer verified before I go back to my client with the information. I have a client that wants to have a portion of his site set up as a secure zone "for members only". He wants each member to use their email as their ID but be able to set their own unique password rather than everyone sharing a single password. Can this be done in BC? If so, how?
    These members will not be administators of any kind, just customers with access to this secure area. (It might be a blog or news section of some kind, they have not been very clear about that as yet. I just need to know so I don't want to over-promise anything with BC.
    Thanks in advance for your help
    Kevin

    Hi,
    There will be one set of password to gain access to secure zones for each contact.  Based on their zone access the login will allow them to access.  So to answer your question it's yes contacts can sign up to a secure zone through a web form or your site admin can grant access for them. 
    More details: http://helpx.adobe.com/business-catalyst/partner/add-secure-area-your-site.html
    Hope this helps!
    -Sidney

  • Generics: Requiring a generic type with multiple super-interfaces

    Is it possible to use generics to require that a type be a composition of two superclasses? For instance, let's say that I have a method that serializes a List. Since the List interface is not itself serializable (but most List implementations are), I cannot have a compile-time guarantee that a method with the following signature will succeed:
    public void serializeList(List serializableList);
    However, could I use generics to construct a new signature (sorry about bad generics syntax) like this:
    public void serializeList(<? extends List, Serializeable> serializableList);
    Thanks.

    It's not exactly generics, you want the object to implement both List and Serializable. Generics would let you declare that the List should contain only Serializable objects (don't ask me to write the declaration though).
    However you can't even guarantee that a Serializable object can be serialized reliably, since it could contain (directly or indirectly) a reference to an object that isn't serializable. So I wouldn't work too hard on solving that problem.

  • Nexus 5548UP VFC with multiple physical interfaces

    I have a physical host that is evenly quad-homed to a pair of 2248PQ Fex's. Each NIC interface is 10Gb.
    Each of my fex's is single homed to a 5548UP in a VPC configuration. I am using FCoE and I have CNA's in my host. My design is below.
    On the LAN side, I would like to have a full 40Gb LACP / VPC Port channel. On the FC side, I would like to be able to create a VFC on each side, (or multiple VFC's if that is required), and attach it to both interfaces on each side, so that I have two full FC paths from the host to each SAN fabric, also for a total of 40Gb.
    I've seen some Cisco diagrams in some much older forum posts that show that this is not possible, but I've seen nothing recent on this. Does anyone know if it's possible?

    Hi,
    If you have two different storage separated, then how this would be possible since in that condition you need to allow both storage on same Port-channels which I think is not valid design.
    Have you got any answer or solution for this ?
    Regards
    Ajay

  • Cisco ISE with multiple Network interface

    Hello,
    I am deploying Cisco ISE 1.2 in a distributed deployment and the requirement is to use external Radius proxy feature. ISE PSNs are designed to have 2 L3 NIC's, Eth0 for administration and Eth1 as client side facing NIC for Radius requests. I am interested to know would Cisco ISE in version 1.2 use Eth1 interface to send RADIUS  authentication request to external RADIUS Proxy server.
    Could not find above information in Cisco SNS-3400 Series Appliance Ports Reference.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/installation_guide/ise_app_c-ports.html
    Thanks
    Kumar

    Thanks Ahmad for the reply.
    Cisco ISE uses standard RADIUS authentication and authorization port to send request to Exteranl RADIUS proxy. As per the interface/port refrence guide of version 1.2 this is listed that is causing a confusion :-
    Eth0
    Eth1
    Eth2
    Eth3
    Policy   Service node
    Session
    •UDP:1645, 1812 (RADIUS Authentication)
    •UDP:1646, 1813 (RADIUS Accounting)
    •UDP: 1700 (RADIUS change of authorization Send)
    •UDP: 1700, 3799 (RADIUS change of authorization Listen/Relay)
    External   Identity Stores
    and Resources
    •TCP: 389, 3268, UDP: 389 (LDAP)
    •TCP: 445 (SMB)
    •TCP: 88, UDP: 88 (KDC)
    •TCP: 464 (KPASS)
    •UDP: 123 (NTP)
    •TCP: 53, UDP: 53 (DNS)
    (Admin user interface authentication and endpoint authentication)
    In external Identity Stores and Resources it says Eth0 is used for (Admin user interface authentication and endpoint authentication), where under sessions it lists that all ports can be used for RADIUS Authentication and Authorization.
    I am not sure what I am missing to understand between the two if you can highlight that.
    Thanks
    Kumar

  • Include multiple sub-interfaces in Cisco ASA for VPN tunnel

    I am trying to create a VPN tunnel between two Cisco ASAs where one ASA has multiple sub-interfaces.
    Say, In Cisco ASA 5550(in datacentre), I created multiple subinterfaces with VLAN ID as below:
    Inside, int0/1 : 10.1.1.0/24
    DMZ, int0/1.100: 10.1.100.0/24 (VLAN 100)
    Production, int 0/1.101 : 10.1.101.0/24 (VLAN 101)
    Management, int 0/1.102: 10.1.102.0/24 (VLAN 102)
    And another Cisco ASA 5505 is only configured with 1 x inside interface Inside, int 0/1: 192.168.1.0/24
    So far, I have only been able to provide outside access to one of the sub-interfaces as NAT rule on inside interface didn't work for VLANs. Hence had to issue Global NAT rule to be applied on Production subinterface so that production VLAN can have outside access. I have managed to establish VPN tunnel between two ASAs on Production sub-interface only, Source interface = Production subinterface
    Additional settings:
    Have ACL to allow all sub interfaces to access outsite ( lower security level)
    NAT rules is configured on Production subinterface with Source NAT Type as Dynamic PAT; when this was configured with source interface as inside, PCs behind various VLAN coun't access internet. 
    I want to establish a site-to-site VPN tunnel with multiple sub-interfaces of Cisco ASA 5550 to Cisco ASA 5505. Would you please suggest what I am missing in my configuration? I need to be able to access multiple VLANs of datacentre from remote site.

    I am trying to create a VPN tunnel between two Cisco ASAs where one ASA has multiple sub-interfaces.
    Say, In Cisco ASA 5550(in datacentre), I created multiple subinterfaces with VLAN ID as below:
    Inside, int0/1 : 10.1.1.0/24
    DMZ, int0/1.100: 10.1.100.0/24 (VLAN 100)
    Production, int 0/1.101 : 10.1.101.0/24 (VLAN 101)
    Management, int 0/1.102: 10.1.102.0/24 (VLAN 102)
    And another Cisco ASA 5505 is only configured with 1 x inside interface Inside, int 0/1: 192.168.1.0/24
    So far, I have only been able to provide outside access to one of the sub-interfaces as NAT rule on inside interface didn't work for VLANs. Hence had to issue Global NAT rule to be applied on Production subinterface so that production VLAN can have outside access. I have managed to establish VPN tunnel between two ASAs on Production sub-interface only, Source interface = Production subinterface
    Additional settings:
    Have ACL to allow all sub interfaces to access outsite ( lower security level)
    NAT rules is configured on Production subinterface with Source NAT Type as Dynamic PAT; when this was configured with source interface as inside, PCs behind various VLAN coun't access internet. 
    I want to establish a site-to-site VPN tunnel with multiple sub-interfaces of Cisco ASA 5550 to Cisco ASA 5505. Would you please suggest what I am missing in my configuration? I need to be able to access multiple VLANs of datacentre from remote site.

  • How to add network information for failover zones with logical hostname?

    Hello!
    As stated in [http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-3069/ds_template-21?a=view] I must not configure network addresses for a zone when I manage these with a logical hostname:
    If you require the SUNW.LogicalHostName resource type to manage all the zone's addresses, configure a SUNW.LogicalHostName resource with a list of the zone`s addresses and do not configure them by using the zonecfg utility.But when I start the zone for the first time using "zlogin -C" it does not ask me any questions about the network. Of course, there is no adapter configured. But how do I add information like routes or nameservers to the system when using a logical hostname?
    TIA
    Stephan

    Hi Stephan,
    I can only assume that when the zone was configured via zonecfg without any network interfaces that sysidcfg did not ask you for the default route or name service, as such you will need to setup those parts up manually.
    Please take a look at the FAQs for zones, i.e. http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zones/faq/ in particular
    http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zones/faq/#u5
    http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zones/faq/#cfg_defroute
    Finally, if you require a NIS client then please see http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5166/ypinit-1m?a=view
    Regards
    Neil

  • Timesten replication with multiple interfaces sharing the same hostname

    Hi,
    we have in our environment two Sun T2000 nodes, running SunOS 5.10 and hosting a TT server currently in Release 7.0.5.9.0, replicated between each other.
    I would like to have some more information on the behavior of the replication w.r.t. network reliability when using two interfaces associated to the same hostname, the one used to define the replication element.
    To make an example we have our nodes sharing this common /etc/hosts elements:
    151.98.227.5 TBMAS10df2 TBMAS10df2-10 TBMAS10df2-ttrep
    151.98.226.5 TBMAS10df2 TBMAS10df2-01 TBMAS10df2-ttrep
    151.98.227.4 TBMAS9df1 TBMAS9df1-10 TBMAS9df1-ttrep
    151.98.226.4 TBMAS9df1 TBMAS9df1-01 TBMAS9df1-ttrep
    with the following element defined for replication:
    ALTER REPLICATION REPLSCHEME
    ADD ELEMENT HDF_GNP_CDPN_1 TABLE HDF_GNP_CDPN
    CHECK CONFLICTS BY ROW TIMESTAMP
    COLUMN ConflictResTimeStamp
    REPORT TO '/sn/sps/HDF620/datamodel/tt41dataConflict.rpt'
    MASTER tt41data ON "TBMAS9df1-ttrep"
    SUBSCRIBER tt41data ON "TBMAS10df2-ttrep"
    RETURN RECEIPT BY REQUEST
    ADD ELEMENT HDF_GNP_CDPN_2 TABLE HDF_GNP_CDPN
    CHECK CONFLICTS BY ROW TIMESTAMP
    COLUMN ConflictResTimeStamp
    REPORT TO '/sn/sps/HDF620/datamodel/tt41dataConflict.rpt'
    MASTER tt41data ON "TBMAS10df2-ttrep"
    SUBSCRIBER tt41data ON "TBMAS9df1-ttrep"
    RETURN RECEIPT BY REQUEST;
    On this subject moving from 6.0.x to 7.0.x there has been some changes I would like to better understand.
    6.0.x reported in the documentation for Unix systems:
    If a host contains multiple network interfaces (with different IP addresses),
    TimesTen replication tries to connect to the IP addresses in the same order as
    returned by the gethostbyname call. It will try to connect using the first address;
    if a connection cannot be established, it tries the remaining addresses in order
    until a connection is established.
    Now On Solaris I don't know how to let gethostbyname return more than one interface (the documention notes at this point:
    If you have multiple network interface cards (NICs), be sure that “multi
    on” is specified in the /etc/host.conf file. Otherwise, gethostbyname will not
    return multiple addresses).
    But I understand this could be valid for Linux based systems not for Solaris.
    Now if I properly understand the above, how was the 6.0.x able to realize the first interface in the list (using the same -ttrep hostname) was down and use the other, if gethostbyname was reporting only a single entry ?
    Once upgraded to 7.0.x we realized the ADD ROUTE option was added to teach TT how to use different interfaces associated to the same hostname. In our environment we did not include this clause, but still the replication was working fine regardless of which interface we were bringing down.
    My both questions in the end lead to the same doubt on which is the algorithm used by TT to reach the replicated node w.r.t. entries in the /etc/hosts.
    Looking at the nodes I can see that by default both routes are being used:
    TBMAS10df2:/-# netstat -an|grep "151.98.227."
    151.98.225.104.45312 151.98.227.4.14000 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
    151.98.227.5.14005 151.98.227.4.47307 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
    151.98.227.5.14005 151.98.227.4.48230 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
    151.98.227.5.46050 151.98.227.4.14005 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
    TBMAS10df2:/-# netstat -an|grep "151.98.226."
    151.98.226.5.14000 151.98.226.4.47699 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
    151.98.226.5.14005 151.98.226.4.47308 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
    151.98.226.5.44949 151.98.226.4.14005 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
    Tried to trace with ttTraceMon but once I brought down one of the interfaces did not see any reaction on either node, if you have some info it would be really appreciated !
    Cheers,
    Mike

    Hi Chris,
    Thanks for the reply, I have few more queries on this.
    1.Using the ROUTE CLAUSE we can use multiple IPs using priority level set, so that if highest priority level set in thr ROUTE clause for the IP is not active it will fall back to the next level priority 2 set IP. But cant we use ROUTE clause to use the multiple route IPs for replication simultaneously?
    2. can we execute multiple schema for the same DSN and replication scheme but with different replication route IPs?
    for example:
    At present on my system, I have a replication scheme running for a specific DSN with stand alone Master-Subscriber mechanism, with a specific route IP through VLAN-xxx for replication.
    Now I want to create and start another replication scheme for the same DSN and replication mechanism with a different VLAN-yyy route IP to be used for replication in parallel to the existing replication scheme. without making any changes to the pre-existing replication scheme.
    for the above scenarios, will there be any specific changes respective to the different replication schema mechanism ie., Active Standby and Standalone Master Subscriber mechanism etc.,
    If so what are the steps. like how we need to change the existing schema?
    Thanks In advance.
    Naveen

  • Mapping in Services Interface with multiple operation... ?

    Hi ALL,
    I have a SOAP to SOAP scenario here Just PI 7.1 with EHP1 acting a bus no mapping nothing .
    1) I have the WSDL file from the receiver system with multiple synchronous operations  in it ..i imported the wsdl as External Definition .. i used the same the WSDL file to create the sender Service interface also...
    when i created the service interface with the operation in it , i just gave the same operation name from the WSDL.this i followed for the sender and receiver service interface.
    1)now the issue is do i need any operation mapping if the service interface has more than one operation ...?
    2) I compelted the scenario without any operation mapping ..but i am getting this error ..Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -ICRM_D to receiver -EXACTTGETWEBSERVICE_D,http://ICRMtoExactTaetWebservice.com.si_os_ICRM_EXACTTETWEBSERVICE: No standard agreement found for , ICRM_D, , EXACTTARGEBSERVICE_D, http://ICRMtoExactarebservice.com, si_os_ICRM_EXACGETWEBSERVICE..?
    pls help me in this issue..
    Thanks
    Souz

    you might want to read this /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2010/09/08/service-interface-and-multiple-operations--is-it-just-an-hype
    you will need to create additional configurations for multiple operations to be supported

  • How to handle multiple inbound interfaces with WSDL messages

    Hi All,
    We have a synchronous: Abap Proxy -> XI -> WebService Scenario. The webservice has multiple SoapActions e.g. SearchForProduct_WithX, SearchForProduct_WithY each with different message types. We have tried to use the receiver determination to send the request to the correct soapaction using conditions e.g. if field X in the request is populated use SearchForProduct_WithX action/message.
    But when we run it through the proxy we get this error:
      <CODE>IF_DETERMINATION.TOO_MANY_IIFS_CASE_BE</CODE>
      <ERRORTEXT>Multiple inbound interfaces not supported for synchronous calls</ERRORTEXT>
    Does anybody know how we can get around this or how best to deal with the multiple soap actions per wsdl situation.

    Hi Yaghya,
    We have used conditions in the Interface Determination. Interestingly if we use an HTTP sender adapter we can use this configuration ... but once we try and use ABAP proxies we get the previous error.
    Another related question ... when we use the http adapter we get a connection time out exception. Same thing happens if we try and use the wsdl tester at /wsnavigator but we can open the wsdl through the browser. Any idea on this one?
    Thanks for all your help.

  • Setting The Default Route in a Jumpstart Install with Multiple Interfaces

    Greetings,
    I'm performing a Jumpstart install on a SPARC v240 server, which has multiple network interfaces. I'm trying to configure all of the interfaces as part of the Jumpstart setup. However, Jumpstart doesn't like the default route that I'm supplying. If I add the default_route parameter anywhere but under the first interface, Jumpstart complains that the default route is missing (by making me add it after it dumps out to the suninstall screens. If I add the default route under the first interface, Jumpstart dumps me to the suninstall screen which says that the route could not be added.
    What am I doing wrong ? Am I trying to get Jumpstart to do something that it won't do ?
    Here is my sysidcfg file. The file shown below will cause Jumpstart to dump to the suninstall screen, which will indicate that the route cannot be added:
    Please wait while the system information is loaded... /
    Please wait while the system is configured with your settings...
    The route provided could not be added at this time. If you wish to accept the
    route provided, press 'Accept' and the address will be added for reboot,
    otherwise press 'Cancel' and provide another address.
    1. Accept
    2. Cancel
    Enter the number corresponding to your choice [1]
    Here is the sysidcfg file:
    name_service=NONE
    network_interface=bge0
    {hostname=conwe125
    ip_address=10.15.8.122
    netmask=255.255.0.0
    default_route=158.73.175.254
    protocol_ipv6=no}
    network_interface=bge1
    {ip_address=10.15.9.122
    netmask=255.255.0.0
    protocol_ipv6=no}
    network_interface=bge3
    {ip_address=158.73.175.117
    netmask=255.255.0.0
    protocol_ipv6=no}
    network_interface=ce0
    {ip_address=10.16.0.208
    netmask=255.255.0.0
    protocol_ipv6=no}
    network_interface=ce3
    {ip_address=158.73.175.118
    netmask=255.255.255.0
    protocol_ipv6=no}
    root_password=5Z5XTytD2Eddo
    security_policy=NONE
    terminal=vt100
    system_locale=en_US.ISO8859-1
    timezone=US/Eastern
    timeserver=localhost
    Thanks In Advance,
    Chris Hanrahan

    That sysidcfg seems a bit odd anyway, have you by any chance put the different interfaces of your jumpstart server into it? Normally you won't need to specify a default router since the jumpstart will figure it out anyway.. Does your jumpstart server have an interface on each network you want to jumpstart?
    7/M.

  • Jumbo Frames within Solaris 10 zones and multiple interfaces...

    We have Jumbo Frames working in the Global Zone, and have the MaxFrameSize=3,3,3 etc...
    We also have our AGGR's built correctly and defined aggr1:1 and aggr1:2
    the problem is on boot-up, if all the name files (hostname.aggr1 and hostname.aggr1:1) are defined in the /etc directory, then you can't start the zones....?
    and if you place the files in the /export/zones/<machinename>/root/etc/ directory, than the interfaces do not start-up automatically..... ?
    So If I want all the interfaces in the global zone to be seen by the other zones, and for the interfaces to come live when the zones are booted.... where do the hostname.interface files live....???

    Darren:
    I understand where you're coming from from a technical perspective. But there is a way you could work around it.
    For argument's sake, zones a+b with e1000g0 - e1000g3
    From an implementation perspective, what's to stop you from:
    e1000g0 / e1000g1 shared between all
    e1000g2 plumbed at global, only assigned to zone a.
    e1000g3 plumbed at global, only assigned to zone b.
    You can certainly have an empty interface file (i.e. cp /dev/null /etc/hostname.e1000g2 ; cp /dev/null /etc/hostname.e1000g3). The interface will plumb but have no IP information configured.
    This doesn't give truly exclusive interfaces to either zone, but it operates effectively as though it were.
    Warning: I haven't actually tested this, but I see no reason that it wouldn't work.

Maybe you are looking for