ERROR DURING MIRO FOR PLANNED DLV. COST.

Dear All,
                      pl help me out i have to do MIRO for a P.O for
planned delivery cost but here an error is occurred as ---> Error in account determination: table T030K key 1000 JI6 V0Message no. FF709
Diagnosis
In the chart of accounts to be posted to, no accounts are defined for the tax code you used.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
Define the accounts to which a tax posting is to be made with the tax code entered in Customizing for taxes on sales/purchases.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
sap11

Hi
Please check the account settings for the tax code.
in FTXP put your tax code , country key. In the details select the line in which rate is maintained & click on Tax Accounts
If no account is maintained, Maintain the same .
You can also maintain the tax accounts in T.code OB40 under the Acct key used such as VST, MWS etc... whcih you hyave assigned to the Condition types in the Taxcing procedure.
In OB40 maintain the Tax code & Tax account.
Thanks & Regards
KK

Similar Messages

  • IN MIRO for planned delivery costs always .19 paise extra coming?

    In MIRO for planned delivery costs always .19 paise extra is showing?
    very strage issue, kindly suggest me on the same
    archana

    ACtually when I am doing MIRO price is taking as USD * exchange rate = as local currency, instead of the price entered in INR for particular condition type like local freight in PO,
    because of which value is increased by .19 paise..
    like in PO local freight  entered charge is 5000000 rs in first column but the same is displayed 111160.52 usd in second column... but exchange rate is 44.98..
    IN MIRO it should take 5000000 for me but it is taking 111160.52 * 44.98 = 5000000.19 rs.. kindly let me know the solution for this
    regards,
    archana

  • MIRO for Planned delivery cost

    Hello,
    Its Raw material  PO with Freight  & unloading Charges codition.Excise duty applicable only for Raw material .
    service tax applicable for Freight & unloading charges vendor.
    while booking MIRO for  Raw material ,excise accounts should be hit  & for  Planned delivery cost  service accounts shoud  hit.
    but While Posting Planned delivery cost tax code for which sevice tax code has been used, excise offset account is getting Posted together with service tax accounts.
    How to Post MIRO for Planned delivery cost with only service tax accounts.
    Regards,
    Jyoti

    Hi Deva,
    Is the problem about the rounding of the value?
    If so I sugest you modify the rounding scheme of the conditions to 'round up' in the condition master. In this case 0,004 would become 0,01. It's important to know that currency is always posted with two decimal numbers, but you can always do this: 1000units cost 4$ (for example).
    For what I know you cannot post a value in invoices for less than 0,01$.
    Give more feedback.

  • Issue with reversal of MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost

    Hi Xperts
    We have found out an issue while reversing the MIRO document for Planned Del costs. When we have done the MIRO, the accounting entry got correctly posted with correct account keys.Conditions are not inventoried.
    However, when we had reversed it - the stock account got hit.Do not understand, why that happened.Do you have any clue?
    1. Suppose we have done the MIRO for Del Cost & then performed GR.Now Stock has already consumed & afterwards we have found that the MIRO for Del Cost is wrong & reverse - in this scenario shall the Stock account will get a hit????
    2. I have maintained Price Control "V" in Material Master.However, I have maintained a Standard Price by mistake.In that case shall SAP ignores the MAP & takes Standard Price into account & post PRD??
    Regards
    Soumick 

    Hi,
    Before checking Planned Delivery costs accounting documents in MIRO posting and MIRO cancellation document, 1st check how Planned Delivery costs designed for your procurement process.
    Use t.code:ME23N, check your Purchase order
    Option-1:
    Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account and at the same time Planned Delivery costs posted to Separate Planned Delivery costs G/L account.
    OR
    Option-2:
    Is Planned Delivery costs posted to Planned Delivery costs G/L account ONLY
    OR
    Option-3:
    Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account ONLY.
    Based the above one setting, system  will post goods receipt and invoice posting document with corresponding accounting entries. Also cancellation of invoice posting document refer to these setting.But account posting depends on price control available in material master.
    NOTE:
    Standard price procedure (price control “S”):The system carries out all stock postings at a price defined in the material master. Variances in price are posted to price difference accounts.
    Moving average price (price control “V”): The system valuates goods receipts with the purchase order price and goods issues with the current moving average price.Differences in price between the purchase order price and the invoice are posted directly to the relevant stock account if there is sufficient stock coverage.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Error doing ERS for planned delivery costs

    Hello!
    We post the freight for STOs via the FRB1 condition as our delivery costs. The freight vendor is of course, different from the vendor in the STO itself which is the plant. The freight vendor is marked for ERS settlement and the ERS works fine for it from the shipment cost documents of sales orders. However, while doing the ERS in transaction MRRL for the same freight vendor for planned delivery costs, nothing comes up in the list to settle. The delivery has been goods issued and freight accounted for. What could be going wrong here? What do I need to check?
    Thanks!

    OK, I got this issue resolved...don't know what was wrong and I didn't change anything but it is working now Freaky. But I do have one more related issue - hopefully someone can shed some light on it. For the freight vendor, we have a different PI partner in the vendor master set up by the plants - when I do the ERS, it is not creating the A/P against that different Invoicing Party (PI) - it is creating the A/P for the same freight vendor code...any clue what is needed to make it create the A/P for the different Invoicing Party that we have set up?
    Thanks!

  • Issue in MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost

    Hi,
    We are facing a problem during MIRO (Planned Delivery Cost)...
    First, We create Two PO's with Freight Value (use diff. vendors in both PO). During MIRO (including both PO), we done Invoicing with Goods / Service Items...when we are trying to create MIRO of Freight value (Planned Delivery Cost)... a pop-up open for choose the Vendor...
    Here, Issue is that only 2 Vendors should be there BUT there shows many vendors to choose..
    Please guide, how to solve this...During MIRO only 2 vendor should appear in that pop-up window...
    thanks

    HI,
    Here, Issue is that only 2 Vendors should be there BUT there shows many vendors to choose..
    many vendor means how match all vendor list?
    have you activate vendor partner  function at your end ? if yes check following things
    check vendor master record and check Invoicing party of that vendor ,also check invoice party of main vendor
    you may get invoicing party of both vendor there
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Error during MIRO for tax code .

    Dear All ,
                            User is doing MIRO but an error comes as " Tax code V0 does not exist in TAXINN " , here i need to tell u that what had happened that in P.O the material is not charged  with any tax , so user have given tax code as V0 , but he had forgotten to maintain cond for BED non cenvatable %  so he had made the cond. record in FV11 , Here my querry is that during MIRO the tax code V0 without cond record gives error from where the system is not capable to fetch the data ?
    OR is there any check so that in such cond. the error should be like this " No cond record is maintained for V0." instaed of
    " Tax code V0 does not existsin TAXINN "
    Rgds
    sap12

    U need the user should assign tax code V0 for non-taxable materials.
    Error what it giving is correct. U should assign this V0 to ur tax Procedure TAXINN.
    Path to Assign
    Spro - IMG - Financial Accounting(New) - FA Global settings - Tax on Sales/ Purchase - Calculation - Taxcodes for Tax-Excempt Sales.
    Procedure - TaxCode - Reason
    If ur not able to solve the problem, Send me ur requrement clearly.
    Subramanian.R

  • CO OBJECT ERROR IN MIRO FOR UNPLANNED DEL COST

    Dear Friends
    I m facing one error in MIRO can u guide me in that context.
    well in MIRO i m postin Unplanned deliver cost.......and it is asking me assignment to this G/L for Cost center object..
    ERROR: Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object
    ..I have already assigned the Cost center for the G/l in OKB9 is there anything else has to be done
    Actually we have 4 plants and 4 Business area i.e whenever i am doing any posting for BW01 -and Business Area BA01 My cost center BW01402 will get hit similarly for other plant and Business are Cost center has been assigned in OKB9 in Details per business Area,is it the right method or anything else has to be done.
    Actually in OKB9 i have maintained that GL and in Detail per business area i have maintained cost center per business area
    we have assigned the right Cost senter only i.e for different Plant and differenct business area we have asigned different cost center.
    Then y i m getting error i m not understanding..
    Please guide me in this context.
    Also i am trying other method of posting Freight (unplanned delviery cost ) as well as labour charge through ACTIVATING -"Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts"
    So that for particular G/L I can Debt or credit that account,in which will doing MIRO G/L Tab gets activated ,i m entering G/L and entering amount for freight and Labor is this the correct procedure.
    Regards
    shailesh

    I have already assigned this G/L as primary cost element in FS00 and in OKB9 also Cost center is assigned as per Business Area as mentioned in the thread
    i.e we have 4 plants and 4 business area so we assigned 4 cost centers to 4 business area, so whenver i m postin unplanned delivery cost for a particular plant then my GL should hit with proper cost center but still it is asking for CO OBJECT
    ERROR IS:
    "Account 40201070 requires an assignment to a CO object"
    If i maintained the default Cost center in FS00 in cost element then it doesnt give error but my requirement is that for a particular plant ,and business are only cost area assigned to it should hit
    Any other solutions.
    Thankz and regards
    Shailesh

  • ERROR DURING  MIRO FOR IMPORT P.O.

    Dear All ,
                          i m doing MIRO for import P.O , here i m doing MIRO for CVD (in USD)  only , but as i m about to post the I.V an error arise as -->"Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
    Message no. FF713
    But in FTXP i have checked that V0 ( input tax ) is maintained here , pl help what else i have to check to resolve the issue .
    sap11

    Maintain the missing entry with the transaction OBQ2:
    Access sequences - mark 'MWST', pushbutton 'Accesses'.
    Maintain the new entry on the screen 'Accesses' for the access sequence 'MWST':
    AcNo. = 10, Tab = 3 (Tax code), Requirement = is blank,
    Exclusive = not active.
    The following should be displayed as fields for the access to MWST and table 3:
    Condition, Doc.struc., Doc.field, Long key word, Direct value I
    ALAND KOMK ALAND Country (blank) (blank)
    MWSKZ KOMP MWSKZ Tax code (blank) (blank)
    OR
    OSS Note 504400
    You enter a document with Transaction MIRO, with reference to a multiple account assigned purchase order. Different control indicators are entered in the account assignment items. The document contains unplanned additional costs which are distributed to the individual account assignment items. The system displays error message: FF713 'Tax code & country & does not exist in procedure &'.
    Other terms
    MIR7, multiple account assignment, T169P, MR1M
    Reason and Prerequisites
    The problem is caused by a program error.
    Solution
    Corrected for Release 4.7 and included in R/3 Support Package for Release 4.0B, 4.5B, 4.6B and 4.6C. Advance correction: See the "Corrections" section.

  • Default Currency of a Vendor in MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost

    Hi,
    This is a scenario of Invoice Verification for Custom/CVD of Customs Department in Import Purchasing.
    We create PO with currency USD, EUR, etc. but always pay Custom Department in INR. While doing Invoice Verification we need to change manually the currency from document currency to INR initially otherwise systems picks the currency from the PO header (USD, EUR, etc.).
    Is there any method by which while doing MIRO for a particular Vendor (Customs Department) the system should pick the currency from the Vendor Master of Custom Department (INR), which is assigned against condition types in PO, not from the PO header.
    Can anyone assist in getting the desired result?
    Thanks in advance
    Thanks & Regards,

    Hi,
    you have to give it manually or you have to write code with help of user exist or a fix through SHDO t-code  transaction where you have to created  variant for transaction MIRO.
    there is no other option
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • How to know miro is planned delivery cost

    hi,
    any where to check eg table or report, can tell the miro posted document is for planned delivery cost.
    i think most of us notice that if display miro posted document, the indicator not there. only during edit or create, indicator is there.
    indicator means the goods/service item, planned delivery cost or both.
    now i need to check miro posted for planned delivery cost. if ask me to check PO in miro line item, i think that would be very difficult to track.
    please help.
    thanks

    Hi Dear,
                 You need to maintain the Account Key for the condition type in the Pricing Procedure.
    and then for the same key maintain the GL account in the OBYC settings.
    Hope it helps you.
    Regards,
    Yawar Khan

  • Report for Planned Delivery Costs

    Hi,
    Is there any Report for Planned delivery costs per month/day.One of our client needs separate report for frieght charges so that he can be able to pay service tax (GTA) for the same.
    Thanks
    Prasad

    Hai,
    Did you check thro' Tcode MIR5.

  • ICal yields "Error during PUT for mailto:valid@email: iMIP request failed"

    Hello,
    I'm trying to bring up an iCal server (using Mac OS X Lion 10.7.3 Server on a Mac Mini). The basic configuration runs fine. But when I tried to enable eMail invitations, I got stuck with those messages in the error log:
    [twistedcaldav.scheduling.imip#error] Could not do server-to-imip request : <twistedcaldav.scheduling.imip.ScheduleViaIMip object at 0x10075e5d0> User timeout caused connection failure.
    [twistedcaldav.scheduling.scheduler.ScheduleResponseQueue#error] Error during PUT for mailto:valid@email: iMIP request failed
    My configuration settings:
    calendar:Scheduling:CalDAV:EmailDomain = ""
    calendar:Scheduling:CalDAV:HTTPDomain = ""
    calendar:Scheduling:CalDAV:AddressPatterns = _empty_array
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Sending:Server = "valid.mail.server"
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Sending:UseSSL = no
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Sending:Username = "valid@email"
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Sending:Address = "valid@email"
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Sending:Password = "safe_password"
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Sending:Port = 25
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Enabled = yes
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:MailGatewayPort = 62310
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Receiving:Server = "valid.mail.server"
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Receiving:UseSSL = yes
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Receiving:Username = "valid_email"
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Receiving:PollingSeconds = 30
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Receiving:Type = "imap"
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Receiving:Password = "safe_password"
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:Receiving:Port = 993
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:AddressPatterns:_array_index:0 = "mailto:.*"
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:MailGatewayServer = "valid.mail.server"
    calendar:Scheduling:iSchedule:Enabled = no
    calendar:Scheduling:iSchedule:Servers = "servertoserver.xml"
    calendar:Scheduling:iSchedule:AddressPatterns = _empty_array
    It does not even try to connect to the given smtp server. How do I proceed?

    I dug into the sources, and am now smarter
    the above settings are invalid, because of the gateway (this has to be iCal itself):
    calendar:Scheduling:iMIP:MailGatewayServer = "localhost"
    Now the IMAP server is being asked, but now I have the next problem:
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:14:37+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadFactory#debug] Scheduling next IMAP4 poll
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:15:07+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadProtocol#debug] RECEIVED: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=LOGIN] Dovecot ready.
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:15:07+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadProtocol#debug] IMAP servergreeting
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:15:07+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadProtocol#debug] SENDING: 0001 AUTHENTICATE PLAIN
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:15:07+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadProtocol#debug] RECEIVED: +
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:15:07+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadProtocol#debug] SENDING: 1GNhbEwhZHNwZXJ0LmRlAFlpZXE5YW==
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:15:09+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadProtocol#debug] RECEIVED: 0001 NO [AUTHENTICATIONFAILED] Authentication failed.
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:15:09+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadProtocol#debug] IMAP authenticate failed for valid@email, trying login
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:15:09+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadProtocol#debug] SENDING: 0002 LOGIN "valid@email" "valid_password"
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:15:16+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadProtocol#debug] RECEIVED: 0002 NO [AUTHENTICATIONFAILED] Authentication failed.
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:15:16+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadProtocol#error] IMAP login failed for valid@email
    [mailgateway] 2012-03-27 11:15:16+0200 [IMAP4DownloadProtocol,client] [twistedcaldav.mail.IMAP4DownloadFactory#debug] IMAP factory connection lost

  • Error during search for WM movement type (999   E  )

    Dear ALL,
    I am try to reverse transaction 313. i use movement 314 but there is error message during creating delivery. the message is
    "Error during search for WM movement type (999   E  )"
    Could someone help me please ?
    Thanks & Best regrads,
    Saiful arif

    Hi,
    Please check the reference  movement type  in table V_156S_WM for inventory movement 314 and for your case of qty and value update indicators
    For qty updation indicator checked, you will have a reference movement type 3XX and not equal to 999
    for  qty updation indicator not checked, you will have reference movement type 999
    qty updation indicator checked means stock / quantity controlled in which case
    check your set up in transaction OMLR , reference movement 3XX from above table should be assigned to a proper WM movement type 3YY
    then check for WM movement 3YY in Transaction OMLJ which should have source storage  type maintained.
    qty updation indicator not checked means stock / quantity not controlled or updated in which case reference movement type is 999 which has no maitenance in OMLR,  moreover it is no stock / qty and no stock transfers situation
    If 3XX happens to be 999 in your case, then check for 3YY movement in OMLR and check for storage type determination for 3YY in OMLJ
    Please note 999 as WM movement  is used for manual transfer within warehouse but not for warehouse movements resulting from IM.
    Hope this should solve your problem.
    Regds
    Shrihari

  • Error during search for WM movement type (911)

    Hi gurus,
    I am using tx code MB1A (Mov type 911). When I try to save it I received the following error message:
    "Error during search for WM movement type (911)"
    any idea of this message?
    Thanks in advance

    The probable reason is that the storage location is Warehouse Managed and the system is not able to find a WM movement corresponding to the IM movement in the warehouse. Please check if the IM Movement type 911 mapped to a WM movement type for the warehouse in configuration?
    Lakshman

Maybe you are looking for