FI- Handling Return Items

Hello Folks-
What is the best t-code in handling reversals that will enable the user to reverse the payment that was applied to an invoice and add a return item fee?
Many thanks!
POINTS PROMISED!!!!

Hi CMM !
Iam doing my first project in lockbox configuration and duration is just one month to implement this. CMM , could you please help me during this.
my email id is [email protected] Could you please give me an email id or your phone number where I can reach you.
I will be really thankful to you, if you do this favour

Similar Messages

Accounts Receivable- Processing NSF/ Return Items

Good Morning SAP Guru's
I need some direction on best practices.
What is the best way to handle NSF checks in SAP? I would assume we would use FBRA to reverse the original document clearing to put the receivables back on account but we really don't have an audit trail. I see that I could use FB08 and assign a void reason code however I would also like the option of entering a 25.00 return item fee.
Any inputs would be greatly appreciated and I will award points.
Many thanks!

Hi Team,
I am going to join a project day after tomorrow.Can anybody kindly send me the FICO-AR realtime checklist of issues and and how to approach for solutions.Will assign full points.
Your reply really means a lot to me,
Thanks,
Deepthi

When i add menu bar in my user interface gives me error that this handle is not a panel handle(return value -42)

i have 3 panels in my application and parent panel is displayed first then i display other two panels which come to the front then on entering correct password i discard the child panel and then you can see parent panel , but there is an issue when i add menu to my parent panel i dont know whats wrong when i add menu bar in my user interface (parent panel) gives me error that this handle is not a panel handle(return value -42) for a child panel. when i dont open and display child panel then its fine , and even without menu added to my parent panel all my panels and my application works perfactly

Hello smartprogrammer,
some more informations are needed in order to properlu help you in this situation:
- Are you adding menus dynamically at runtime or in the UIR editor? If dynamically: how are you loading the menu bar?
- Are you dynamically tailoring the menu bar at runtime (adding or deleting menu items, dimming / undimming some of them or checking / unchecking)?
- Can you post the code where you are getting the error, documenting variables and scope (local to the function, global to the source file, global to the project)?
You can look at uirview.prj example that ships with CVI for an example of LoadMenuBar (the exampl eis in <CVI samples>\userint folder): in that project, the menu bar is shown as a context menu when you right-click on a tree element (see DeferredMenuCB callback).

Return items back to supplier

In oracle ebs R12, How to handle returns to supplier for the warranty items that have been returned to us (we buy and then sell) by the customers. Thanks!
What is the process followed?

Process RMA from the customer.
Move the returned inventory to the org where the original PO was received.
Perform a return-to-vendor (RTV) transaction on the original po (assuming the PO is not finally closed)
Generate a debit memo if necessary.
Receive the replacement part.
Apply the debit memo to pay for the replacement part.
OR
Do not generate debit memo at all.
Hope this helps
Sandeep Gandhi
Independent Consultant

Return Item and Free goods check box in purchase order

Hi Guru:
I just got the question regarding the return item and free goods check box,my question is that if I check the free good check box,then the price of the matieral will be charged to zero,however,if I want to issue the return purchase order to the vendor,does I need to check the return box first and then issue the return order to the vendor? Then go to MIGO transaction to select the movement type 122 to return the goods,what's the whole precedure for returning the goods to the vendor,can anybody tell me,very appriated!

Hi,
Retun to vendor through have two types....
One is you have Po created, vendor send the item in that few items have rejected so you need to return the item to vendor......
here in MIGo chose returrn to vendor selce the PO numbere.... system automaticaly take the movent type 122....
sencond type is Retun PO..... In Po while creting the PO tick the return indication..
If you do the GR system will pick 161mopvent type.. ( GR returns)...
REgards
anand

Using bapi_po_create1 to create PO with return item - Order Combination

Hello,
There's a shipping tab that appears in a purchase return item, and in it there's a flag called Order Combination.
Only i can't seem to find a way to change that flag using this BAPI, nor using bapi_po_change.
Any ideas?
Thank you in advance.
Duarte

Hi
Its a setting that you maintain in the customer master reord that defaults it.
So if you want this to be flagged for some vendors and for some no flag the you need to maintain accordingly in the Customer master data - Sales are data Shipping tab
If you want it to be maintained through BAPI then populate the same in POSHIPPINGEXP structure
Thanks & Regards
KK

Returns item from purchase order in SRM

Hi,
Is it possible to return item from a purchase order in SRM?
meaning : to return goods to an external vendor.
in ECC i know its possible. but i want to know if its possible in SRM.
if yes, how?
(i dont want to return by confirmation)
we are using SRM550.
regards,
vered
Edited by: Vered Madar on Aug 2, 2010 1:28 PM

Hi,
In SRM POs, GR based invoice indicator for Goods item is ticked based on the Vendor Master. If the vendor master has the tick, then PO will have the tick for GR based invoice. However for a service PO/limit PO, GR based invoice comes as default in PO and cannot be undone.
Regards,
Sanjeev

Please tell me how to handle list item in this concern

please tell me how to handle list item in this concern
My problem is:
i have a category table with column categoryname(varchar type)
I want to display the records of categoryname in a drop down list (i.e., list item )
So ..please tell me how to do it
Thanks in advance..

This code is just a sample from the Help documentation. It won't work until you modify it for your form.
Why do you have "steps" in your code? You are suppose to do what the steps tell you. You don't place the steps in your code. The steps must be removed from your code.
Step 1 code goes in a program unit, not in a trigger.
Step 2 and 3 code usually goes in a trigger.
You will have to replace the names of the items and record group with your own names as you have defined them in your form.
step 1: create a procedure in your application
procedure load_list(itm in VARCHAR2, rg in VARCHAR2) is
group_id RecordGroup := Find_Group(rg);
list_id Item := Find_Item(itm);
Begin
if Populate_Group(group_id)<>0 then
Message('Unable to populate record group');
Raise Form_Trigger_Failure;
end if;
Clear_List(list_id);
Populate_list(list_id, group_id);
end;
step 2: create a record group named rg_cat and assign Record Group Query to something like "select categoryname from category"
step 3: call this procedure as
load_list('categoryname','rg_cat');

MEIS Foreign Trade - Purchase order return items ECC 6.0

Hi Experts,
can you explain whether there has been any change in the way that MEIS is collect data.
I'm looking into a problem with the interstat reporting in ECC 6.0 transaction MEIS.
The problem occurs for PO return items, when movement type 161 and 162 are posted in the same period for a PO items,
this is actually a cancel of the return item, so in my view these posting are not to be reported as imported goods.
But if I run the report for the next period after the posting is done the PO item are selected on the report, this problem does not occurs in ERP 4.7.
I create a return order in period 01.2012, and do the posting in same period, run the MEIS for period 02.2012.
Periodic Declarations is done for SE.
Any help are appreciated.
Regrads, Lars

Hi Jürgen,
Thanks for you reply.
You are right that VI99 are for reporting returns, but my problem is that MEIS in ECC 6.0 now shows the items as a full value
for reporting, if i do this in 4,7 they are not seleted for reporting, and i my view they should not be seleted in MEIS but they are.
what is you opinion.
I just check the movement type in Customizing and the "type of posting" are set to "2" the setting are the same in both 4,7 & 6,0
Regards, Lars

Return item (RETPO) as a key field in condition table

Hi,
I would like to know how we can utilize return item indicator as one of the key fields in the PO pricing condition table.
[Requirement]
Condition record
Use Retrun item as a key
e.g.) Table A999: POrg | Vendor | Return item | condition rate
#1: 1000 | M123456789 |blank | 3%
PO pricing
If the PO item is NOT marked as return, #1 should be applied to that item.
If the PO item is marked as return, no condition record should be determined.
[Question]
Though I've configured as above, return item indicator seems to be ignored.
When I tick the initial indicator in access sequence, the condition rate is always applied to the PO item for both with and without return item indicator.
When I tick-off the initial indicator in access sequence, the condition rate is not applied to the PO item for both with and without return item indicator.
Why does it happen?
Is it possible to apply the condition record only to the PO without return item?
I'd like to know how to make it effective in the condition table, RETPO=blank.
As long as searched, I couldn't find any similar question.
Your help would be much appliciated.
Best Regards,
Mari

Hi Manosij,
Thank you for your reply.
I've already done as your instruction.
However, the result is not what I'm expecting.
I believe I'm right to creating the condition table.
But I think something wrrong in access sequence...
Though I do as your instruction, creating the condition record in MEK1 only for blank one, the record is applied to those with X when creating PO.
If you have another clue on my question, it would be much appreciated.
Best Regards,
Mari

Return item to vendor

Hi all,
We have two diffirent return process in our company.
1) Return items to vendor with 161 movement type. In this case first we create PO and for this po we create GR ( 161 ) then we gave to vendor return receipt.
2) Vendor has warranty for items. So when we gave back items which is under warranty to vendor there is two options.a) vendor is fixing item then give it back to us and If item costs out of warranty we pay to vendor. b) vendor pays us back for this item, so we return to first process.
Can you suggest solution for second process?
Kind regards
Tolga

Already jagdeep explained all the return process .
Use 122 Movement type and return the material to vendor and once vendor give it back to you can proceed with 101 .
If the item out of warranty we pay to vendor . - For this you can receive the material and move to blocked stock when the warranty completes. Here Stock lying with us and you can pay the amount to vendor .
vendor pays us back for this item, so we return to first process - If the vendor returns the material , then use 122 from blocked stock and receive the stock which vendor is going to send back .
If you need separate stock wise use Batch Management and SLED if it requires.
Regards , Anil Kumar G

Table name in which return item data is stored of a PO

Can some please specify the table name in which return item data is stored of a PO?
Thanks in advance;

Hi,
Let me explain what exactly I need. In a PO there is a checkbox "Retun Item". If we check that checkbox for an item that item becomes a retun item.
I need to fetch all the data of this return Item. The commitment data goes to table COOI but this return item records doesn't get stored in COOI table. I need all the data of this entry including the Network Activity, Project, WBS element etc.
Please let me know if you could help me.
Thanks.

Difference MBRL - ME21N with items specified as return items

Hi Gurus,
can you please help me to understand the difference of these two return processes.
We are using ECC 6.0 and want to implement a "standard" process for returning goods to the supplier if they don't meet our expectations.
So now i have implemented the whole customizing for doing this with ME21N and now i found the transaction MBRL, wich also allows to creaty SD-Deliveries. And now i am wondering where is the difference.
With ME21N i found one big disatvantage - i can not refere to another document, like a delivery schedule or former purchase order.
For information i would be very grateful.
Thanks in advance.
Georg

Hi Gordon,
thanks for your reply.
So for me it seems that ME21N (PO creation) has no advantage for returing goods to the supplier. No reference to previous document, additonal step in the process to create a PO.
With MIGO (Return Delivery) or MBRL you can refer to another document and you can also create SD-Deliveries.
So my question is more general - why does SAP provide the possibility to return goods within the ME21N when there is an easier and faster possibility. For me having another document (purchase order with item specified as return item) just means having additional complexity.
But maybe I am wrong and there is an advantage i am not able to see at the moment.
Thanks
Georg

Condition type FRA1, condition category B and returns item

When a delivery is not accepted and returned, a new purchase order is created where the field returns item flagged.
Conditions like ZPB0 becomes a negative value, but the FRA1 not. In our business it is common not to pay the transport costs if the delivery is denied, even more, we expect a credit note also for the delivery costs.
In the condition FRA1 de condition category = B (delivery costs), which is a must for transaction MIRO.
When negative delivery costs are entered, SAP gives the error message "negative delivery costs not allowed. While expecting a credit note with negative delivery costs, we want to have it this way.
Question: how are other companies dealing with these circumstances? Is it possible -without changing standard SAP- to avoid the error message and be able to proceed?
Any hint or information is highly appreciated, as we see no more options to solve this issue.
Bob

The moment you say it is credit note means you are getting from vendor
so the condition can't be -Ve
All the company geeting creadit by soing this only.
No -Ve condition

Returns item problem

Hello everybody,
I have a problem with the following process:
1. User creates a purchase order with returns item checked (it's internal return
within the same company code)
2. User uses transaction VL10B to create delivery note
3. MIGO transaction is then used with reference to the purchase order from step 1
(movement type 101 which is then automatically converted to 161)
4. VL02 is used with reference to delivery form step 2.
However delivery completed indicator for purchase order is not set automatically
for returns item even though open quantity is now zero.
I have checked the customizing and the delivery completed indicator should be
set automatically. Is this normal behavior ? Perhaps I'm missing something.
From one point of view it seems logical since 161 is actually goods issue and
not goods receipt. From another point of view - if open quantity is zero, shouldn't
the delivery completed indicator be set automatically ?
We are considering the possibility to write a report that checks if the open quantity
is zero and sets this indicator. I can't fight the feeling that something is missing
here.
Thank you in advance for your replies.
Best regards,
mr_blonde

Hai,
The Reason why the delivery comleted indicator is not set-automatically
is u have to make a setting in SPRO,->MM>Inventor Management-->
u will find a node here where u can default the delivery comleted indicator
for ur plant........if check the box there......the system will set the indicator,when
the delivery is comleted.
hope this hepls.
Regards
Arshad

FI- Handling Return Items

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for