Import takes more time
Hi ALL,
I am using Oracle 10gR2 on solaris 10.
I am doing export and import. I exported one table which is 9.5 GB size and export dump file is 4GB size.
I am trying to import that dumpfile into another database. its running more than 15 hours, but still not completed.
Please find the Details:
I am doing export and import not datapump.
I exported that table with direct=Y, consistent=N, constraint=N.
That table which I exported is created in Bigfile Tablespace. Target table also bigfile tablespace.
Could you kindly give any suggestion.??
Regards
Senthil
Hello,
I am doing export and import. I exported one table which is 9.5 GB size and export dump file is 4GB size.
I am trying to import that dumpfile into another database. its running more than 15 hours, but still not completed.Do you have a log for your Import ? Else, it's a good practise to use the following parameters:
LOG=<log_file>.log
FEEDBACK=10000Then, you can see the import in progress. For every Table at each 10000 rows inserted you'll get a dot ".".
Else, I could noticed that Tables with LONGRAW datatype can take a long time to import. Do you have this kind of Table ?
More over, at the end of the Import, the validation of the constraint can take time too.
So, be patient and monitore the sessions on the database.
On the other hand, as you are in 10g I would recommend you to use DATAPUMP, it's more powerful than the Classical Export/Import.
Hope this help.
Best regards,
Jean-Valentin
Similar Messages
-
Import SCA files in Development Tab of the Transport Studio take more time
Hi,
After Check-In files in the Transport Studio, the import of SCA files starts in the development Tab of the Transport Studio.
The import takes more time. Why this happens?
Am I missing any configuration? Please specify in detail.
Thanks in Advance,
SathyaSC: sap.com_SAP-JEE:
SDM-deploy
Returncode : Not executed.
How to check the username, password and url for SDM?
Log file of Repository-import:
Info:Starting Step Repository-import at 2009-10-13 22:15:49.0484 +5:00
Info:Component:sap.com/SAP_JTECHS
Info:Version :SAP AG.20060119105400
Info:3. PR is of type TCSSoftwareComponent
Info:Component:sap.com/SAP_BUILDT
Info:Version :SAP AG.20060411165600
Info:2. PR is of type TCSSoftwareComponent
Info:Component:sap.com/SAP-JEE
Info:Version :SAP AG.20060119105300
Info:1. PR is of type TCSSoftwareComponent
Info:Step Repository-import ended with result 'not needed' at 2009-10-13 22:15:49.0500 +5:00
Log File of CBS-make :
Import got failed.
Info:build process already running: waiting for another period of 30000 ms
Info:no changes on the CBS request queue (DM0_DEMObp1_D) after a waiting time of 14430000 ms
Fatal:The request queue is not processed by the CBS during the given time intervall => TCS cannot import the request because queue is not empty
Fatal:There seems to be a structural problem in the NWDI. Please look after the operational status of the CBS.
Fatal Exception:com.sap.cms.tcs.interfaces.exceptions.TCSCommunicationException: communication error: The request queue is not processed during the given time intervall. There seems to be a structural problem in the NWDI. Please look after the operational status of the CBS.:communication error: The request queue is not processed during the given time intervall. There seems to be a structural problem in the NWDI. Please look after the operational status of the CBS.
com.sap.cms.tcs.interfaces.exceptions.TCSCommunicationException: communication error: The request queue is not processed during the given time intervall. There seems to be a structural problem in the NWDI. Please look after the operational status of the CBS.
at com.sap.cms.tcs.client.CBSCommunicator.importRequest(CBSCommunicator.java:369)
at com.sap.cms.tcs.core.CbsMakeTask.processMake(CbsMakeTask.java:120)
at com.sap.cms.tcs.core.CbsMakeTask.process(CbsMakeTask.java:347)
at com.sap.cms.tcs.process.ProcessStep.processStep(ProcessStep.java:77)
at com.sap.cms.tcs.process.ProcessStarter.process(ProcessStarter.java:179)
at com.sap.cms.tcs.core.TCSManager.importPropagationRequests(TCSManager.java:376)
at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.importazione.ImportManager.importazione(ImportManager.java:216)
at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.importazione.ImportQueueHandler.execImport(ImportQueueHandler.java:585)
at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.importazione.ImportQueueHandler.startImport(ImportQueueHandler.java:101)
at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.proxy.CmsTransportProxyBean.startImport(CmsTransportProxyBean.java:583)
at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.proxy.CmsTransportProxyBean.startImport(CmsTransportProxyBean.java:559)
at com.sap.cms.pcs.transport.proxy.LocalCmsTransportProxyLocalObjectImpl0.startImport(LocalCmsTransportProxyLocalObjectImpl0.java:1736)
at com.sap.cms.ui.wl.Custom1.importQueue(Custom1.java:1169)
at com.sap.cms.ui.wl.wdp.InternalCustom1.importQueue(InternalCustom1.java:2162)
at com.sap.cms.ui.wl.Worklist.onActionImportQueue(Worklist.java:880)
at com.sap.cms.ui.wl.wdp.InternalWorklist.wdInvokeEventHandler(InternalWorklist.java:2338)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.generation.DelegatingView.invokeEventHandler(DelegatingView.java:87)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.controller.Action.fire(Action.java:67)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WindowPhaseModel.doHandleActionEvent(WindowPhaseModel.java:422)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WindowPhaseModel.processRequest(WindowPhaseModel.java:133)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WebDynproWindow.processRequest(WebDynproWindow.java:344)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.cal.AbstractClient.executeTasks(AbstractClient.java:143)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ApplicationSession.doProcessing(ApplicationSession.java:298)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doApplicationProcessingStandalone(ClientSession.java:705)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doApplicationProcessing(ClientSession.java:659)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doProcessing(ClientSession.java:227)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.RequestManager.doProcessing(RequestManager.java:150)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.defaultimpl.DispatcherServlet.doContent(DispatcherServlet.java:56)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.defaultimpl.DispatcherServlet.doPost(DispatcherServlet.java:47)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:390)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:264)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:347)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:325)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:887)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:241)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:92)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:148)
at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:100)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:170)
Info:Step CBS-make ended with result 'fatal error' ,stopping execution at 2009-10-14 02:16:28.0296 +5:00 -
Why import of change request in production takes more time than quality?
Hello All,
why import of change request in production takes more time than import into quality?Hi jahangeer,
I believe it takes same time to import a request in both quality and production as they will be in sync.
Even then if it takes more time in production that may depend on the change request.
Thanks
Pavan -
Multithreaded File Copy takes more time 1.5 times than single thread.
import java.io.File;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.FileOutputStream;
import java.nio.channels.FileChannel;
public class TestMulti implements Runnable {
public static Thread Th1;
public static Thread Th2;
String str = null;
static int seqNumber = 1000000000;
public static void main(String args[]) {
Th1 = new Thread(new TestMulti("1_1"));
Th2 = new Thread(new TestMulti("1_2"));
Th1.start();
Th2.start();
try {
Th1.join();
Th2.join();
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
public TestMulti(String str) {
this.str = str;
public void run() {
File f = new File("C:/Songs2/" + str);
File files[] = f.listFiles();
String fileName = "";
String seqName = "";
String seq = "";
int sequenceNo = 0;
try {
for (int j = 0; j < files.length; j++) {
File musicFiles[] = files[j].listFiles();
for (int k = 0; k < musicFiles.length; k++) {
seq = "18072006";
seqName = seq + seqNumber;
sequenceNo = 10000 + seqNumber % 100;
seqNumber = seqNumber + 1;
fileName = musicFiles[k].getName();
String fileExt = fileName.substring(fileName.length() - 3,fileName.length());
String targetFile = "C:/Songs1/" + sequenceNo;
File fi = new File(targetFile);
if (!fi.exists()) { fi.mkdir(); }
targetFile = "C:/Songs1/" + sequenceNo + "/" + seqName+ "." + fileExt;
FileInputStream fin = new FileInputStream(musicFiles[k]);
FileChannel fcin = fin.getChannel();
FileOutputStream fout = new FileOutputStream(targetFile);
FileChannel fcout = fout.getChannel();
fcin.transferTo(0, fcin.size(), fcout);
fout.flush();
fcout.close();
fcin.close();
fout.close();
fin.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
Multithreaded File Copy takes more time 1.5 times than single thread.
Is there any issue with this code. Please help me.If all of your threads are doing CPU-intensive work, or all are doing I/O to the same interface (for example, writing to the same physical disk), then multithreading would not be expected to help you.
Multithreading does not magically make your CPU able to do more work per unit time than it could otherwise.
Multithreading does not magically make your network interface or disk controller able to pump more bytes through than it could otherwise.
Where multithreading helps (some or all of this has already been mentioned):
* When you have multiple, independent CPU-bound tasks AND multiple CPUs available on which to execute them.
* When you have tasks that involve a mix of CPU-bound and I/O-bound work. The CPU-bound stuff can crank while the I/O-bound stuff waits for bytes to be written or read, thus making use of what would otherwise be CPU "dead time."
What you're doing does not fit either of those scenarios. Copying a file is pure I/O. If the source and destination file are on the same phsyical disk or controller, adding threads only adds overhead with no real possibility to do more work per unit time.
If your source and destination are on different disks or controllers, then it's possible that you could get some benefit from multithreading. While one thread is waiting for bytes to be written to the target disk, the other thread can be reading from the source disk. -
Hi all
I want to fetch just twenty thousands records from table. My query take more time to fetch twenty thousands records. I post my working query, Could you correct the query for me. thanks in advance.
Query
select
b.Concatenated_account Account,
b.Account_description description,
SUM(case when(Bl.ACTUAL_FLAG='B') then
((NVL(Bl.PERIOD_NET_DR, 0)- NVL(Bl.PERIOD_NET_CR, 0)) + (NVL(Bl.PROJECT_TO_DATE_DR, 0)- NVL(Bl.PROJECT_TO_DATE_CR, 0)))end) "Budget_2011"
from
gl_balances Bl,
gl_code_combinations GCC,
psb_ws_line_balances_i b ,
gl_budget_versions bv,
gl_budgets_v gv
where
b.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=gcc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and bl.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=gcc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and
bl.budget_version_id =bv.BUDGET_VERSION_ID and gv.budget_version_id= bv.budget_version_id
and gv.latest_opened_year in (select latest_opened_year-3 from gl_budgets_v where latest_opened_year=:BUDGET_YEAR )
group by b.Concatenated_account ,b.Account_descriptionHi,
If this question is related to SQL then please post in SQL forum.
Otherwise provide more information how this sql is being used and do you want to tune the SQL or the way it fetches the information from DB and display in OAF.
Regards,
Sandeep M. -
Takes more time to start & shutdown the database
Hi All,
I have created a database in oracle9i by following manual steps. Every thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and shutdown also.
but the problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the database and the same during the shutdown. So anyone help me..
the follwing are the pfile specifications:
db_name=practice
instance_name=practice
control_files= 'E:\practice\control\control1.ctl',
'D:\practice\control\control2.ctl'
db_block_size=2048
db_cache_size=20m
shared_pool_size=20m
background_dump_dest='E:\practice\bdump'
user_dump_dest='E:\practice\udump'
Thanks in AdvanceEvery thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and > shutdown also.Please restate the above.
problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the >database and the same during the shutdownHow have you compared? Could it be O/S resources, installation of additional software; you have not mentioned the O/S and complete version of your database.
You can review the following although I am bit unclear;
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96533/instreco.htm#440322
Adith -
PDF Form Takes More Time To Open when using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948
Hi All,
Adobe Reader Version : 8 and above.
designer : 7.1.3129.1.296948
When i am devloping the adobe interactive form Using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948, When I open the same in the adobe reader 8.1.2 and 9.1 its take more time (Nearly 20 mins).
When I am opening the same in the adobe reader 7.1 its opening fine.
How to resolve This problem in adobe reader 8.1.2,9.0 and 9.1 ?
Regards,
Boopathi MHi,
I have seen this exact same problem happening when, I created/developed a adobe form, on a PC which had adobe livecycle designer 7.1, but had adobe reader 7.
Once the form is created on a machine which had reader 7, then it does not matter whether u try to open that pdf in reader 8 or 9, it will take 20-30min to open, it will freeze your pc, etc.
Please ensure that when/where ever the form was first created, that machine had adobe reader 8 or higher installed it.
I hope this helps,
Regards,
Hanoz -
PDF Form Takes More Time To Open when using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948 + Reader 8 above
Hi All,
When i am developing the adobe interactive form Using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948,After that I converted to PDF.
When I am opening the PDF form its takes more time(Using reader version 8.1.2).
How to resolve This problem ?
Regards,
Boopathi MHi,
I have seen this exact same problem happening when, I created/developed a adobe form, on a PC which had adobe livecycle designer 7.1, but had adobe reader 7.
Once the form is created on a machine which had reader 7, then it does not matter whether u try to open that pdf in reader 8 or 9, it will take 20-30min to open, it will freeze your pc, etc.
Please ensure that when/where ever the form was first created, that machine had adobe reader 8 or higher installed it.
I hope this helps,
Regards,
Hanoz -
'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document
Hi Experts,
I m using 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' in my custom report, it takes more time for creating Material documents.
Please let me know if there is any option to overcome this issue.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
LeoHi,
please check if some of following OSS notes are not valid for your problem:
[Note 838036 - AFS: Performance issues during GR with ref. to PO|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/838036]
[Note 391142 - Performance: Goods receipt for inbound delivery|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/391142]
[Note 1414418 - Goods receipt for customer returns: Various corrections|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414418]
The other idea is not to commit each call, but executing commit of packages e.g. after 1000 BAPI calls.
But otherwise, I am afraid you can not do a lot about performance of standard BAPI. Maybe there is some customer enhancement which is taking too long inside the BAPI, but this has to be analysed by you. To analyse performance, just execute your program via tr. SE30.
Regards
Adrian -
'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document for the 1st time
Hi Experts,
I am doing goods movement using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE in my custom code.
Then there is some functional configuration such that, material documents and TR and TO are getting created.
Now I need to get TO and TR numbers from LTAK table passing material documnt number and year, which I got from above used BAPI.
The problem I am facing is very strange.
Only for the 1st time, I am not finding TR and TO values in LTAK table. And subsequent runs I get entries in LTAK in there is a wait time of 5 seconds after bapi call.
I have found 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document with similar issue, but no solution or explanation.
Note 838036 says something similar, but it seems obsolete.
Kindly share your expertise and opinions.
Thanks,
AnilHi,
please check if some of following OSS notes are not valid for your problem:
[Note 838036 - AFS: Performance issues during GR with ref. to PO|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/838036]
[Note 391142 - Performance: Goods receipt for inbound delivery|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/391142]
[Note 1414418 - Goods receipt for customer returns: Various corrections|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414418]
The other idea is not to commit each call, but executing commit of packages e.g. after 1000 BAPI calls.
But otherwise, I am afraid you can not do a lot about performance of standard BAPI. Maybe there is some customer enhancement which is taking too long inside the BAPI, but this has to be analysed by you. To analyse performance, just execute your program via tr. SE30.
Regards
Adrian -
Hi All,
I have cloned KSB1 tcode to custom one as required by business.
Below query takes more time than excepted.
Here V_DB_TABLE = COVP.
Values in Where clause are as follows
OBNJR in ( KSBB010000001224 BT KSBB012157221571)
GJAHR in blank
VERSN in '000'
WRTTP in '04' and '11'
all others are blank
VT_VAR_COND = ( CPUDT BETWEEN '20091201' and '20091208' )
SELECT (VT_FIELDS) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF GS_COVP_EXT
FROM (V_DB_TABLE)
WHERE LEDNR = '00'
AND OBJNR IN LR_OBJNR
AND GJAHR IN GR_GJAHR
AND VERSN IN GR_VERSN
AND WRTTP IN GR_WRTTP
AND KSTAR IN LR_KSTAR
AND PERIO IN GR_PERIO
AND BUDAT IN GR_BUDAT
AND PAROB IN GR_PAROB
AND (VT_VAR_COND).
Checked in table for this condition it has only 92 entries.
But when i execute program takes long time as 3 Hrs.
Could any one help me on this>1.Dont use SELECT/ENDSELECT instead use INTO TABLE addition .
> 2.Avoid using corresponding addition.create a type and reference it.
> If the select is going for dump beacause of storage limitations ,then use Cursors.
you got three large NOs .... all three recommendations are wrong!
The SE16 test is going in the right direction ... but what was filled. Nobody knows!!!!
Select options:
Did you ever try to trace the SE16? The generic statement has for every field an in-condition!
Without the information what was actually filled, nobody can say something there
are at least 2**n combinations possible!
Use ST05 for SE16 and check actual statement plus explain! -
Query Takes more Time when i execute from the Instant client.
Hi,
Currently in our Env we have some Queries takes more time when we run from the Instant Client.
System Details
OS=Solaris 10 x86 64bit
Oracle 10.2.0.4
Client Side
$ sqlplus trd_trd_ro/trd_trd_ro@prdba001/TRADE1
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production on Mon Aug 9 16:26:25 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
SQL> set timing on
SQL> select mod(lastinstmessagesequence, 1000000000) LastInstIDSeqNo from tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias='2221';
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:01:54.19
SQL> Disconnected from Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - ProductionSame Query running on Server Side
^C130-oracle@prdba001 txt: sql
Database: trd_trd_owner/trd_trd_owner@prdba001/TRADE1
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Mon Aug 9 17:15:18 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
trd_trd_owner@TRADE1> set timing on
trd_trd_owner@TRADE1> select mod(lastinstmessagesequence, 1000000000) LastInstIDSeqNo from tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias='2221';
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:00:00.12
trd_trd_owner@TRADE1> exitKindly help me what could be the Issues.Hi Charles,
Thanks for your Quick response.I pulled the info.
sys@TRADE1> SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR('bpxr7axhxaqvy',NULL,'ALLSTATS LAST'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID bpxr7axhxaqvy, child number 0
select /*+ GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS */ mod(lastinstmessagesequence, :"SYS_B_0") LastInstIDSeqNo from
tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias=:"SYS_B_1"
Plan hash value: 1955857846
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.06 | 6121 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.06 | 6121 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | 1 | | 0 |00:00:00.06 | 6121 |
| 4 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.05 | 3073 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_QUOTE | 1 | 30080 | 0 |00:00:00.05 | 3073 |
| 6 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TIBEX_ORDER | 1 | 971 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TIBEX_ORDER_IDX_OLT | 1 | 971 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 9 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_TSTRADE | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 11 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_IOIREQUEST | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 13 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BESTEXREL | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
| 15 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 2862 |
|* 16 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | SYS_C0058325 | 1 | 339 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 2862 |
| 17 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
|* 18 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_EDPPULLORDERS | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
| 19 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058803 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 21 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057785 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 23 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057827 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 25 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_DELETEADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 27 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058148 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 29 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 30 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058264 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 31 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 32 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058516 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 33 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 34 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058561 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 35 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 36 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058783 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 37 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 38 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058977 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 39 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 40 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058859 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 41 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 42 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0059197 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 43 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 44 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_CANCELTRDADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 45 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 46 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BULKCANCELADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
5 - filter("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
8 - access("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
10 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
12 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
14 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
16 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
18 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
20 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
22 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
24 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
26 - filter(("USERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
28 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
30 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
32 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
34 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
36 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
38 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
40 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
42 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
44 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
46 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
SQL_ID bpxr7axhxaqvy, child number 1
select /*+ GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS */ mod(lastinstmessagesequence, :"SYS_B_0") LastInstIDSeqNo from
tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias=:"SYS_B_1"
Plan hash value: 1955857846
Plan hash value: 1955857846
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.12 | 8545 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.12 | 8545 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | 1 | | 0 |00:00:00.12 | 8545 |
| 4 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5496 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_QUOTE | 1 | 21056 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5496 |
| 6 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 4 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TIBEX_ORDER | 1 | 660 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 4 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TIBEX_ORDER_IDX_OLT | 1 | 660 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 4 |
| 9 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_TSTRADE | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 11 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_IOIREQUEST | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 13 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BESTEXREL | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
| 15 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 |
|* 16 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | SYS_C0058325 | 1 | 339 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 |
| 17 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
|* 18 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_EDPPULLORDERS | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
| 19 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058803 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 21 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057785 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 23 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057827 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 25 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_DELETEADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 27 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058148 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 29 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 30 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058264 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 31 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 32 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058516 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 33 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 34 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058561 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 35 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 36 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058783 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 37 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 38 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058977 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 39 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 40 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058859 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 41 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 42 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0059197 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 43 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 44 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_CANCELTRDADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 45 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 46 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BULKCANCELADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
8 - access("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
10 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
12 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
14 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
16 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
18 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
20 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
22 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
24 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
26 - filter(("USERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
28 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
30 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
32 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
34 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
36 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
38 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
40 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
42 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
44 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
46 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
SQL_ID bpxr7axhxaqvy, child number 2
select /*+ GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS */ mod(lastinstmessagesequence, :"SYS_B_0") LastInstIDSeqNo from
tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias=:"SYS_B_1"
Plan hash value: 1955857846
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | Reads |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 21 | 1 |00:00:00.13 | 8476 | 3 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 1 | 21 | 1 |00:00:00.13 | 8476 | 3 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | 1 | | 1 |00:00:00.13 | 8476 | 3 |
| 4 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5283 | 0 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_QUOTE | 1 | 21056 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5283 | 0 |
| 6 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:00.01 | 148 | 3 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TIBEX_ORDER | 1 | 660 | 150 |00:00:00.01 | 148 | 3 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TIBEX_ORDER_IDX_OLT | 1 | 660 | 150 |00:00:00.01 | 5 | 0 |
| 9 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_TSTRADE | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 11 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_IOIREQUEST | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 13 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 | 0 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BESTEXREL | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 | 0 |
| 15 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 | 0 |
|* 16 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | SYS_C0058325 | 1 | 339 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 | 0 |
| 17 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 | 0 |
|* 18 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_EDPPULLORDERS | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 | 0 |
| 19 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058803 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 21 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057785 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 23 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057827 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 25 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_DELETEADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 27 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058148 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 29 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 30 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058264 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 31 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 32 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058516 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 33 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 34 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058561 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 35 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 36 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058783 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 37 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 38 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058977 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 39 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 40 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058859 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 41 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 42 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0059197 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 43 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 44 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_CANCELTRDADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 45 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 46 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BULKCANCELADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
8 - access("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
10 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
12 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
14 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
16 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
18 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
20 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
22 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
24 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
26 - filter(("USERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
28 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
30 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
32 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
34 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
36 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
38 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
40 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
42 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
44 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
46 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
249 rows selected. -
How to stop the sap crm search in the middle if it takes more time
Hi,
We are in SAP CRM 7.0 EHP1.
In webui, if we search for any customer, product, contact, transactions and the volume of results list is more, system takes more time to diplay it in results list and till that time wheel spins. If user decides to stop the search, the only option they have is logoff or F5 which will take to new session.
But I came to know in EHP1, options are there to stop the search manually and proceed with other transactions/search in the same session.If any one knows this, pl share the details.
Regards
SureshHello,
This functionality was recently introduced by the following note:
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2044841
Regards
Joaquin -
Bind variable code takes more time to complete?
Hello, My database is oracle11g.
I have same plsql code and first one is without bind variable and second one is with bind variable. Usually, bind variable should take less time. But here
the bind variable takes more time than the regular code... Can any one please explain why?
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered.
SQL> declare
2 cursor c1 is select * from emp where rownum < 50;
3 l_start NUMBER DEFAULT DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME;
4 v_cnt number;
5 begin
6 for i in c1 loop
7 SELECT count(*) into v_cnt
8 FROM rate
9 WHERE rate_id IN (SELECT rate_id
10 FROM ratedetail
11 WHERE benefit_id = i.benefit_id)
12 AND effective_date =
13 TO_DATE ('2011-01-23 00:00:00', 'yyyy-MM-dd HH24:MI:SS')
14 AND rate_type_id = 1;
15 end loop;
16 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('total minutes....'||ROUND(ROUND((DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME - l_start)/100, 2)
/60,3));
17 end;
18 /
total minutes.....06
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered.
SQL>
SQL> declare
2 cursor c1 is select benefit_id from emp where rownum < 50;
3 l_start NUMBER DEFAULT DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME;
4 v_cnt number;
5 begin
6 for i in c1 loop
7 execute immediate 'SELECT count(*)
8 FROM rate
9 WHERE rate_id IN (SELECT rate_id
10 FROM ratedetail
11 WHERE benefit_id = :x)
12 AND effective_date = trunc(sysdate)-202
13 AND rate_type_id = 1'
14 into v_cnt using i.benefit_id;
15 end loop;
16 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('total minutes....'||ROUND(ROUND((DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME - l_start)/100, 2)
/60,3));
17 end;
18 /
total minutes.....061
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>Shrinika wrote:
Thanks for the clarification.. Now i understand...
One final question on this thread before i close this thread....
My database is set to CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE for some reason. It seems somebody applied a "quick and dirty fix" to "database is slow" problem. BAD PRACTICE
My question is, when we use bind variable, does it parse the sql code every time? or does it reuse the execution plan?
In my database, it reuse the execution plan... Just checking... When we set CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE, it should generate the execution plan
for every unqiue sql code... Is that correct? Am i confusing?If by "parse" you mean a "hard parse" (which generates execution plan), then the answer is NO. As you observed, it reuses execution plan.
For e.g. with CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE setting, following SQLs
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = 10 ;and
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = 20 ;would tend to reuse the same execution plan since both of these will be rewritten by oracle (before execution) as
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = :SYS01 ;Hope this helps.
Edited by: user503699 on Aug 14, 2010 3:55 AM -
DELETE FROM database table takes more time...
Hi Friends,
The below statement takes more time.
LOOP AT i_final.
DELETE FROM zcisconec WHERE werks = i_final-werks
AND aufnr = i_final-aufnr
AND vornr = i_final-vornr.
ENDLOOP.
Internal table I_FINAL will have more than 80,000 records.
DB Table zcisconec have 4 primary key fields out of 10 fields.
Below 4 fields are primary key fields
WERKS
AUFNR
VORNR
MATNR
Please guide me..How to optimize it?
Regards,
VijiHI,
Check this one ,
put a break point on that delete statement and add another line of code after, like .... CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0. Now got to debug and stop at the DELETE statement, check the number of records in your DB table, now hit F5 to step to the next statement, now go back to SE16 and refresh, do you see the number change? It should.........if you are selecting the data correctly, make sure that you are getting data into the IT_ table.
DELETE zcisconec from i_final.
CALL FUNCTION 'DB_COMMIT'.
Regards,
Ansari.
Edited by: Ansari Samsudeen on Sep 15, 2009 8:14 AM
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to convert a date to string
hi i have a date field in the format yyyy-MM-dd i wan to make this as string Date lastDate = stmt.getDate(3);this will return a date 2003-11-13 i wan to make it as a string
-
Oracle apps. 11i financials implemention
Hi gopal, I am new to Oracle Apps. Presently I am working as an Oracle 11i financials Functional consultant.. Could you send me the soft copy of Oracle Application Implementation Method. My email id is [email protected], [email protected] thanks, reg
-
Hi, I'm currently building an app in flash CS5 to go on the iPhone (on WinXP). So far so good although I am having problems with sound. On testing the movie I get the following error: "Sound has no valid device sound path although exporting device so
-
HT4623 new iphone 5 home button not working (works 10% of the time, no rhyme or reason)
New iPhone 5, home button almost never works. I occasionally get Siri (which isn't helpful) but mostly have to restart the phone to get out of whatever app I'm in. ANNOYING!!!
-
Can someone pls explain me (networking, DNS)
hi guys, can some1 pls explain me what is hostname in the following record: mysite.com. IN SOA hostname.mysite.com. admin.mysite.com. (1; 3h; 1h; 1w; 1h) is it the name of my network interface ? many thanks Alex