Individual req reduction field in req class ?

Hi Gurus,
can anybody please explain the use of Individual req reduction Field in requirement class, i am not able to understand it even after doing some excercises.
Thanks&Regards,
Venkat.

Dear Prasanna,
While transferring the PIRs from R/3 to APO it is not mandatory to select the option of 'Req reduction' in CFM1.
The use of this indicator is to control the selection of product-location cobinations for which the Requirement Reduction should take place.
That is if you do not select this indicator, the requirement reduction would be transferred for all material-location combinations for which an active integration model exists.
If you set this indicator, you can create separate integration models for Requirement Reduction and in the filter criteria specify the materials and locations for which you desire the requirements reduction to be transferred.
Thus it is not mandatory to check the option 'Req. Reduction' for successful transfer of PIRs.
Hope this clarifies your doubt.
Regards,
SCMLearner

Similar Messages

Req.Reduction option in CFM1 txn

Dear Gurus,
I am sending the PIR's to APO. Should i also tick Req.Reduction in CFM1? or it's optional
Prasanna

Dear Prasanna,
While transferring the PIRs from R/3 to APO it is not mandatory to select the option of 'Req reduction' in CFM1.
The use of this indicator is to control the selection of product-location cobinations for which the Requirement Reduction should take place.
That is if you do not select this indicator, the requirement reduction would be transferred for all material-location combinations for which an active integration model exists.
If you set this indicator, you can create separate integration models for Requirement Reduction and in the filter criteria specify the materials and locations for which you desire the requirements reduction to be transferred.
Thus it is not mandatory to check the option 'Req. Reduction' for successful transfer of PIRs.
Hope this clarifies your doubt.
Regards,
SCMLearner

Field-symbols as class attribute

Hi Fellas,
Is there a way we can define a field-symbols as a class attribute ? My requirement is that i am dynamically constructing a structure at runtime in my model class and binding the component of this structure to my view fields. I am able to create the structure which is basically ref to cl_abap_structdescr and the problem is when i am binding to the model attribute, i need this to be a structure so that i can address the components as "//model/structure.component".
Please let me know how we can define a field-symbol as a class attribute.
Cheers,
Ram.

Hi Ram,
Field-Symbol as class attribute is not possible. Your way to do this by REF TO DATA is the correct way for that.
By default data binding is only possible like this:
Simple field attribute
value=//<model>/<field name>
Structure attribute
value=//<model>/<structure name>.<field name>
Table attribute
value=//<model>/<table name>[<line index].<field name>
If you want to bind to your data reference you have to implement your own getter and setter methods. Read this <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/fb/fbb84c20df274aa52a0b0833769057/frameset.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/fb/fbb84c20df274aa52a0b0833769057/frameset.htm</a> for further information. In addition to that, you have to implement your own GET_M_S_xxx to return metadata of your structure. By doing all this it is possible to implement a completely dynamic data binding. In the view it looks like the regular Structure attribute: value=//<model>/<data-ref name>.<field name>
Regards,
Thilo

Set fields of derived class in base class constructor via reflection?

Does the Java Language Specification explicitly allow setting of fields of a derived class from within the base class' constructor via reflection? The following test case runs green, but I would really like to know if this Java code is compatible among different VM implementations.
Many thanks for your feedback!
Norman
public class DerivedClassReflectionWorksInBaseClassConstructorTest extends TestCase {
abstract static class A {
    A() {
        try {
            getClass().getDeclaredField("x").setInt(this, 42);
        } catch (Exception e) {
            throw new RuntimeException(e);
static class B extends A {
    int x;
    B() {
    B(int x) {
        this.x = x;
public void testThatItWorks() {
    assertEquals(42, new B().x);
    assertEquals(99, new B(99).x);
}

why not just put a method in the superclass that the subclasses can call to initialize the subclass member variable?In derived classes (which are plug-ins), clients can use a field annotation which provides some parameter metadata such as validators and the default value. The framework must set the default value of fields, before the class' initializer or constructors are called. If the framework would do this after derived class' initializer or constructors are called, they would be overwritten:
Framework:
public abstract class Operator {
    public abstract void initialize();
}Plug-In:
public class SomeOperator extends Operator {
    @Parameter(defaultValue="42", interval="[0,100)")
    double threshold;
    @Parameter(defaultValue="C", valueSet="A,B,C")
    String mode;
    public void setThreshold(double threshold) {this.threshold = threshold;}
    public void setMode(String mode) {this.mode = mode;}
    // called by the framework after default values have been set
    public void initialize() {
}On the other hand, the default values and other metadata are also used to create GUIs and XML I/O for the derived operator class, without having it instantiated. So we cannot use the initial instance field values for that, because we don't have an instance.

Field-symbols in classes

Hello,
Is it possible to use field-symbols in classes?
When I try to declare field-symbol in class like other variable, appears an error.
Or may be it is possible to use something instead of field-symbols?
Great thanx in advance!

Hi
You can use field symbols in classes.
Sample code is given below:
CLASS c1 DEFINITION.
PUBLIC SECTION.
    METHODS m1 IMPORTING oref TYPE REF TO object
                         attr TYPE string.
ENDCLASS.
CLASS c1 IMPLEMENTATION.
METHOD m1.
    FIELD-SYMBOLS <attr> TYPE ANY.
    ASSIGN oref->(attr) TO <attr>.
    WRITE <attr> ...
ENDMETHOD.
ENDCLASS.
Thanks
Khushboo

Model Binding and Calculated Field Syntax for "class" Attribute

Hi,
I tried to use the calculated field syntax from SAP UI5 to change the CSS class attribute of an element based on some model property, i.e., I wanted to change the class in the corresponding formatter function based on the currently bound value. However, my formatter function is not called. When I use the same syntax on a text attribute, it works.
I also tried to use normal property binding, but it did not work on the class attribute either (it just put class="{property}" in the rendered HTML).
Is there anything I missed or is it just not possible to use property binding and calculated field syntax for class attributes? Did anybody try something like this before?
I think it is a standard use case to change the CSS class based on some model property. So, if anybody knows how to do that, could you give a short example?
Best regards
Svenja

They have a class property. At least, I can do the following in an XML view:
<Button
              icon="sap-icon://add"
              press="onButtonPress"
              class="my-button-class" />
I would expect the following to work as well, but for me it did not:
<Button
              icon="sap-icon://add"
              press="onButtonPress"
              class="{/customClass}" />
This renders the following HTML (cropped to the important parts):
<button type="button" class="sapMBtn {/customClass}">
</button>
It seems like the class attribute is something special although I don't see a reason why. Other HTML templating engines, for example, support things like that.

Field symbols inside class

Is it possible to declare field symbols inside classes?
Thanks in advance.
Hema
Moderator message: please search for information and try yourself before asking.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Dec 23, 2010 10:55 AM

Hi Hemalatha,
We can use Field Symbols in classes.
local field_symbols within methods are allowed.
you can only use field-symbols within method (locally), not as direct class attribute (globally).
U can check with this sample code.
Sample code is given below:
CLASS c1 DEFINITION.
PUBLIC SECTION.
METHODS m1 IMPORTING oref TYPE REF TO object attr TYPE string.
ENDCLASS.
CLASS c1 IMPLEMENTATION.
METHOD m1.
FIELD-SYMBOLS <attr> TYPE ANY.
ASSIGN oref->(attr) TO <attr>.
WRITE <attr> ...
ENDMETHOD.
ENDCLASS.
I hope u got this .....

Field symbols as Class Attributes

Hello Gurus,
Is anybody able to say to me if it is possible to declare field symbols as class attributes? As I can understand until now, this is not possible and we need to use some attribute with the "TYPE REF TO Data" to get the information we need. Correct?
Thanks,
Daniel.

Ok, let me see if someone can give me some idea on how to improve my method:
Method: PREPARE_PTOOL_DATA
Parameters specification:
Parameter        Type     Typing     Reference Type
PF_ANALYSIS        Importing     Type     /SYM/SC_PT_ID_ANALYSIS_D
PF_ANAL_DESC        Importing     Type     /SYM/SC_NM_DESC_ANALYSIS
PF_LOGIC        Importing     Type     CHAR01
PF_MATERIAL        Importing     Type     MATNR
PF_MAKTX        Importing     Type     MAKTX
PT_DATA_COMPA        Exporting     Type     /SYM/SC_TAB_PT_RESULT_CP
PT_CALC_ANALY        Exporting     Type     /SYM/SC_TAB_PT_RESULT_CA
PT_DATA_MATERIAL1 Changing     Type     /SYM/SC_TAB_PROC_ALLERG_RESULT
PT_DATA_MATERIAL2     Changing     Type     /SYM/SC_TAB_PROC_ALLERG_RESULT
Source code:
From the /SYM/SC_CL_PROCESS_ALLERG_GEN class
Old version (but it is working)
METHOD prepare_ptool_data.
DATA: ls_data_material1   TYPE /sym/sc_s_proc_allerg_result,
        ls_data_material2   TYPE /sym/sc_s_proc_allerg_result,
        lf_index_material1 TYPE sy-tabix,
        lf_index_material2 TYPE sy-tabix,
        ls_result_cp        TYPE /sym/sc_pt_result_cp,
        ls_result_ca        TYPE /sym/sc_pt_result_ca.
Prepare data for Data Comparison step
IF pt_data_compa IS REQUESTED.
    LOOP AT pt_data_material1 INTO ls_data_material1.
      lf_index_material1 = sy-tabix.
      CLEAR ls_result_cp.
      MOVE pf_analysis   TO ls_result_cp-analysis.
      MOVE pf_anal_desc TO ls_result_cp-desc_analysis.
      MOVE ls_data_material1-algbe TO ls_result_cp-desc_property.
If Logic 'A', move the text from ls_data_material1 to original
material status
      IF pf_logic EQ c_logic_a.
        MOVE ls_data_material1-agsbe TO ls_result_cp-val_orig_matnr.
If Logic 'B', move the text from ls_data_material1 to "toy"
material status
      ELSEIF pf_logic EQ c_logic_b.
        MOVE ls_data_material1-agsbe TO ls_result_cp-val_toy_matnr.
      ENDIF. " IF pf_logic EQ c_logic_a.
Read the lt_data_toy by the Allergen ID (ALGEN)
      CLEAR ls_data_material2.
      READ TABLE pt_data_material2 INTO ls_data_material2
            WITH KEY algen = ls_data_material1-algen BINARY SEARCH.
      IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
        lf_index_material2 = sy-tabix.
If Logic 'A', move the text from ls_data_material2 to "toy°
material status
        IF pf_logic EQ c_logic_a.
          MOVE ls_data_material2-agsbe TO ls_result_cp-val_toy_matnr.
If Logic 'B', move the text from ls_data_material2 to original
material status
        ELSEIF pf_logic EQ c_logic_b.
          MOVE ls_data_material2-agsbe TO ls_result_cp-val_orig_matnr.
        ENDIF. " IF pf_logic EQ c_a.
Delete record from lt_data_toy, index lf_index_toy
        DELETE pt_data_material2 INDEX lf_index_material2.
      ENDIF. " IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      APPEND ls_result_cp TO pt_data_compa.
Delete record from lt_data_orig, index lf_index_orig
      DELETE pt_data_material1 INDEX lf_index_material1.
    ENDLOOP. " LOOP AT lt_data_material1 INTO ls_data_material1.
ENDIF. " IF pt_data_compa IS REQUESTED.
Prepare data for Calculation Analysis step
IF pt_calc_analy IS REQUESTED.
    LOOP AT pt_data_material1 INTO ls_data_material1.
      lf_index_material1 = sy-tabix.
      CLEAR ls_result_ca.
      MOVE pf_material   TO ls_result_ca-matnr.
      MOVE pf_maktx      TO ls_result_ca-maktx.
      MOVE pf_analysis   TO ls_result_ca-analysis.
      MOVE pf_anal_desc TO ls_result_ca-desc_analysis.
      MOVE ls_data_material1-algbe TO ls_result_ca-desc_property.
If Logic 'A', move the text from ls_data_material1 to original
material status
      IF pf_logic EQ c_logic_a.
        MOVE ls_data_material1-agsbe TO ls_result_ca-val_curr_stat.
If Logic 'B', move the text from ls_data_material1 to "toy"
material status
      ELSEIF pf_logic EQ c_logic_b.
        MOVE ls_data_material1-agsbe TO ls_result_ca-val_simul_stat.
      ENDIF. " IF pf_logic EQ c_logic_a.
Read the lt_data_toy by the Allergen ID (ALGEN)
      CLEAR ls_data_material2.
      READ TABLE pt_data_material2 INTO ls_data_material2
            WITH KEY algen = ls_data_material1-algen BINARY SEARCH.
      IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
        lf_index_material2 = sy-tabix.
If Logic 'A', move the text from ls_data_material2 to "toy°
material status
        IF pf_logic EQ c_logic_a.
          MOVE ls_data_material2-agsbe TO ls_result_ca-val_simul_stat.
If Logic 'B', move the text from ls_data_material2 to original
material status
        ELSEIF pf_logic EQ c_logic_b.
          MOVE ls_data_material2-agsbe TO ls_result_ca-val_curr_stat.
        ENDIF. " IF pf_logic EQ c_a.
Delete record from lt_data_toy, index lf_index_toy
        DELETE pt_data_material2 INDEX lf_index_material2.
      ENDIF. " IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      APPEND ls_result_ca TO pt_calc_analy.
Delete record from lt_data_orig, index lf_index_orig
      DELETE pt_data_material1 INDEX lf_index_material1.
    ENDLOOP. " LOOP AT lt_data_material1 INTO ls_data_material1.
ENDIF. " IF pt_calc_analy IS REQUESTED.
ENDMETHOD.
As you can see, I am repeating almost the same code, just changing some items. I am not sure if I can use new parameters (ANY or ANY TABLE) but, my first idea to improve it was to use the field-symbols (and it works ok). The issue is that I have to repeat the assignment lines every same named method of the classes I am changing (I would like to do the assignment into a new method of the superclass). Do you think it is possible or should I give up and proceed with the assignments locally, for each same named method of each class?
Thanks,
Daniel.

Passing several fields to various classes and methods?

Passing several fields to various classes and methods?
Hi there.
I have an application that allows a user to define a configuration and save it.
The user can edit an existing configuration, add a new one, or delete an existing one.
Once a configuration is selected the user then starts an application that relies on the selected configuration data. Each configuration holds around 60 fields.
The configuration information is mixed between integers and strings. Around 25 are hidden from the user, and 35 can be modified by the user. The number of fields is not a fixed amount. For example the configuration contains an email-to list and the list for one configuration can have 1 address, and for another could have 10 addresses.
I have decided to redesign using the Model View Controller concept. I am creating the model to hold the configuration information. I am trying to decide if I should have single get and set methods for each field or if I should create some kind of Object that holds all of one configuration and pass this back.
The configuration that is selected does not really require the fields to be sorted in any particular order.
What would you suggest is a good structure to use to pass the configuration information around?
I have been using the Properties class with an .ini file that can be read and updated.
Is this efficient? Doesn�t this impact the speed of processing if I have to read a file every time I want to determine what a particular configuration field is?
Could I just create a class that reads the profile, stores the configuration information for one specific selected config, and then passes the class back to the calling procedure. This would consolidate all the file reading into one class and after that it is held in memory.
Would it be better to read the configuration information into a collection of some sort , or a vector and pass this back to calling routine?
public class MyModel {
     //read information to load the field of
     Private MyConfig selectedConfiguration = new MyConfig;
        Private int     selectedField1 = 0;
        /** Constructor */
     MyModel() {
          // open profile, read profile fields the
          selectedConfiguration.field1 = profileField1; //assume this is 5
                selectedConfiguration.field2 = profileField2; //assume this is 10
          selectedConfiguration.field3 = �Test�;
                field4ArrayOfStrings = new String[selectedConfiguration.field1 ]
                                                             [selectedConfiguration.field2];
          selectedConfiguration.field3ArrayOfStrings [0][0] = �First String�
     public class MyConfig(){
     int field1;
     int field2;
     String field3;
     String[][] field4ArrayOfStrings;
     // more stuff here �.
     // selectedConfiguration
     public void setConfiguration(MyConfig p_config) {
          String selectedConfiguration = p_config;
     public String getConfiguration() {
          return selectedConfiguration;
     //The other option is to have get and set for each field
     public void setField1(int field1) {
          String selectedField1 = field1;
     public String getField1() {
          return selectedField1;
}Slight correction: reference to field3ArrayOfStrings changed to field4ArrayOfStrings.
Message was edited by:
tkman

johndjr wrote:
I think the term you want is "cross reference".
Back in the olden days of green bar paper listings and linker maps they used to be quite common. At least they were where I worked.
I have not seen any cross references in some time.
java.lang.Object grr_argh_why_I_oughta_you_dirty_rat; // a pretty cross reference

Class field initialization outside class constructor

Hi,
what are the benefits of initializing a class field outside the class constructor? I use this for fields, that i do not need to pass parameter to via the constructor. The code seems more clear/easy to read.

Hi,
what are the benefits of initializing a class field
outside the class constructor? I use this for
fields, that i do not need to pass parameter to via
the constructor.
The code seems more clear/easy to read.That's a pretty big benefit.
For another, consider when you have multiple constructors: you've factored
common code out of them (good) and made it impossible to forget to
initialize that field later when, later on, you write another constructor(also good).

"Valuation" field in requirement class

Hi Experts,
Could you please explain the difference between
1) "Valuation" field in requirement class
and
2) "Consumption" field in account assignment category field (assigned in requirement class)
Thanks,
GAN
Edited by: DSK on Feb 8, 2012 3:26 AM

Hi,
Valuation field defines the whether the sales order stock should be valuated or non valuated.
Consumption indicator functions as follows.
If the sales order is assigned with any cost objects like cost center, order etc it will get consumption indicator in delivery document
in the following strategy.....
1> Delivery item category assigned to requirement type - OVZI
2> Requirement type assigned to requirement class - OVZH
3> Requirement class has the consumption indicator - OVZG
When you create delivery, system will determine delivery item category and it pull all the values from the requirement class associated with tha item category. This is the way it gets consumption indicator .
Also check note 161729.
Regards,
Divraj

Generating Indep Reqs rather than Dep Reqs from Planning Strategies

Is there any way when using a Strategy 50/52 to generate Indep Reqs rather than dep reqs for components.?
Can this be achieved by using strategy 70 at the component level ? - I am not sure this can be done. It seems to always give Dep Reqs ?
If so what are the settings ?
I am not sure this can be done. It seems to always give Dep Reqs ?
Am I correct that unless you plan at component level and use strategy 70 you cannot generate Indep Reqs they will always be Dep Reqs?
Just to be clear I am not after a MTS scenario here (i.e. 40 ) but rather a Sales Order driven demand so 50/52.
So Mat A FG would be a 50/52 and Component X would be set up ith a 70 - unfortunately this gives dep reqs not indep reqs?
any thoughts appreciated

Milton,
Is there any way when using a Strategy 50/52 to generate Indep Reqs rather than dep reqs for components?
I don't really know what this means. Independent requirements by their very nature are not generated by other requirements, they are Independent.
Independent requirements are mostly created as follows
1. Manually
2. Copy from other independent requirements
3. Copy from a Material Forecast
4. Copy from SOP
5. Copy from Flex Planning
You could create a Z program that would create them as well.
Best Regards,
DB49

How to get private fields from super class?

Hi.
I must get protected and private fields from a class. I know that sounds werid but I have a very good reason for doing so, ask if you want.
I have tried the getDeclaredField(String) method, but it apparently doesn't return the fields declared by the super classes.
What's the smartest solution to this?
Thank you all.
edit: note that the superclass hierarchy's length is 3 and that there are several classes at the bottom level.
Edited by: bestam on Sep 24, 2009 2:05 PM

bestam wrote:
I do not claim I have invented a new programming language Sir, you must be mistaken. This is not turing complete.
This is a language for describing Cards or a game's rules if you want.
AspectJ isn't Turing complete but AspectJ is still a compiler.
This is how I have been working :
- I have implemented the core library in Java (what is a Player, what is an Effect, what is a Card, what is a BuildingCard, what is a Player's Turn and so on)
- It also includes packages dedicated to service, able to retrieve and send data to the clients via sockets.
- Then I have "hardcoded" a dozen of specific cards in Java, for testing and validating the core library. I have been doing so by extending the BuildinCard's class for example.
- But my ultimate goal is not to code thoses 1.000+ cards of the game in Java. I chosed to design a little language so that I would end up writing cards faster. While I'm traversing the syntactical tree representing the card, I feed the card's fields one by one. Some of them are quite primitive, some other are more complex and have a recursive nature for instance.
Providing detail for how you implemented it doesn't change anything about what I already said.
Thus, this is not really a compiler as it doesn't transform a text in language A into a text in language B.
You really need to understand more about what "compilers" and certainly compiler theory do before you decide what they can and cannot do.
And your statement still does not change what I said.
Is this wrose than the bean design pattern from JSP ? I'm not sure.
Bean design? A "bean" has almost zero requirements.
Aside of that, it's a bit harsh to be told "read the fucking manual" while I have written my first compiler some years ago.Not sure who that was directed. I suggested some reading material on compiler theory.
If you think that your idea is ideal then knock yourself out. Since I doubt I will end up seeing it in anything that I must maintain it doesn't matter to me. But you did in fact ask what the best solution was.

I can't Enter User Fields in Asset Class (t.code S_ALR_87009007)

Hi All,
In customizing I've to "Enter Your User Fields in Asset Class" (t.code S_ALR_87009007).
SAP doesn't allow me to change the filling in the view, I only can display them.
What cuold it depend on.
Thanks for your help.
G.

Hi Rossi,
This is not an authorisation issue at all.
S_ALR_87009007, this tcode can be used to maintain a default Eval Group for asset master creation with the specified asset class.
If your Maintainace Level at CLASS is not maintained for any evaluation group, you can edit the values over thers.
SPRO-> FA-> AA ->Master Data -> Screen Layout -> Define Screen Layout for Asset Master Data -> Define Screen Layout for Asset Master Data....here select your screen layout, which is assigned to your questioned asset class on OAOA and click on logical field groups -> Allocations -> Field Group rules.
Here for all eval groups, make the field status to optional and select check boxes CLASS, MNNO, SBNO and SAVE.
Now check with S_ALR_87009007, here you will be able to edit the inputs.
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Srinu

MM-material class field name req??

Hi
I had to develop a reprot to generate the vendor list,based on the selection-screen i/p:mat no,mat type,mat grp,mat class.
except Material Class I had found the filed name & all req data to do the report.I had found the fileds frm mm03,class type(KLART),class name(CLASS) ,but i am unable to a make a link with the matnr,also whcih table will be the most approp fo all this senerio of vendor list.
So its a kind request,if any one can tell me the resp fildname & table for
mat class,so that i can do the reprot.
Tables : mara,m_kredm. i am using in this reprot.
rgds
vipin.

hi vipin...try this method....
use the table KSSK , KLAH and SWOR;
first of all get the int class no ( CLINT ) for that material from kssk;
here object is the material with all leading zeros from the table KSSK(OBJEK).
then use the int.class no as the key field for the other two tables.
you will find the description in SWOR table.
kesav

Individual req reduction field in req class ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for