Integration Process of abstract interfaces of diff SWCV's

Hey all,
I am trying to create an integration process of a sender and receiver abstract interfaces of different SWCVs. If I create the integration process in one of the SWCV, I am not able to select the other interface in the receive step.Is it a necessary criteria to have the both sender and receiver abstract interfaces to be in the same SWCV? Can they not be in different SWCV?
-AR

Hi Antonio,
CLEAR SLD CACHE is not enough. After your SWCV update in SLD, you need to import again your SWVC inside IR.
All your objects will be NOT deleted. Thus don't worry about your Data Type, Mappings, BPM, etc...
I have already done such an import (after adding a usage-depency), I have never lose an object.
If you are some doubt, you can Export all your namespaces in a file (cf. Tools > Export). Thus you will be able to Import all your namespaces if something will be wrong (but it will be not the case!). Ask to your admin to get this file in order to NOT send it to your production system...
Regards
Mickael
Message was edited by: Mickael Huchet

Similar Messages

Abstract interfaces between diff swcvs

Hi Guys,
I am designing BPM under my own SWCV. I need to use two abstract interfaces which were defined in entirely different SWCV.
My scenario is like Proxy-BPM-SOAP. The scenario is synchronus but the Proxy side i have two seperate interfcaes as outbound (Asynch) and inbound (Asynch) instead of a single synchronus interface.
I have created 2 abstract interfaces for these 2 interfaces and i need to use them under my own SWCV where i am designing the BPM process
any help would be appreciated
Thanks,
srini

Hi,
From SAP Help.
An integration process can only reference interfaces from its own software component version.
Check this link under the topic abstract interface.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/78/62373f58502e48e10000000a114084/content.htm
Regards,
Sudheer.

Abstract Interfaces from diff SWCVs

Hi Guys,
I am doing PROXY-BPM-SOAP synchronus scenario.
The request is coming from the outbound asynch interface which would be talking to the webservice request and the reponse from the webservice should be sent back to inbound asynch interface.
The outbound asynch interf used during the request processing and the inbound asynch interface used during the reponse are under sap delivered XI content SWCV. The webservice wsdl which has both req and response are under my own SWCV
How to acess the abstract interfcaes under sap delivered SWCV under my own swcv where i am designing the IP ?
I tried for dependencies but i could not find the swcv in the sld which came with the xi content
any help would be appreciated
Thanks,
srini

Hi Aamir,
we cant change proxies as they are linked to other interfaces. we decided to go with the BPM. can you please explain me how to acheive this by using BPM ?
The main problem what i am seeing is acccessing the abstract interfcaes for these 2 seperate asynchro interfaces which are entirely in the diff SWCV
I thought of creating dependencies but i could not find this in sld as it came as xi content.
any help would be really apprecited
Thanks,
srini

Integration Process Referencing Message Interfaces In A Different SWCV

Hello Experts!
I am creating an Integration Process IP within SWCV A, using an Interface Mapping Object within SWCV A, Abstract Message Interface MI_A1 from SWCV B and Abstract Message Interface MI_A2 from SWCV B.
Because we have the dependencies set up in the SLD wherein SWCV A is a dependent SWCV of SWCV B, these basis objects can be referenced by the IP during the create process.
However, when I try to execute a "check" or activate the IP, I get the following error:
Expression must return the interface type MI_A1
Expression must return the interface type MI_A2
If I copy the MI objects into SWCV A, the IP is activated successfully.
The question is:
Why is it that while I'm creating the IP I am able to reference these basis objects, but the "check" or "activate" does not allow it? What is this error telling me?
Want more points? Appreciate any insight.

Thanks for pointing me to the right direction, Aamir.
It turned out that the problem was caused by one of the Message Interfaces used by the Interface Mapping. It had errors to where it was pointing to an inactive IDoc object. The bad MI caused the IM to be bad, that eventually caused the problem while creating the Integration Process.
Thanks again!
H.

Idoc to flat file using Integration process does not show up at all

Hello All,
I created a scenario IDOC to Flat File using Integration Process and one without IntegrationProcess. I am able to execute the one without Integration Process easily.
However when I send the IDOC from SAP then the Integration Process scenario just does not work.
I Checked SXMB_MONI There is no entry for the Integration Process.I can see entry for other without Integration Process.
SXI_CACHE : I can see my Integration Process active
SWEQADM : I have activated the Event Queue and Background job
SWF_XI_ADM_BPE : ALL BPE is showing green status.
All syntax check on IP are fine.
There is no Basis Help for me so there could be some additional basis steps which need to be configured. Has anyone faced such an issue with Integration Process?
Regards
Prashanta

Hope this might help you. when u configure an IDoc as Sender with BPM this is how you proceed.
1. let us split the scenario into two.
a. Sender to BPM ( Integration Process).
b. BPM to Receiver.
2. First let us configure the first Sender to BPM.
a. Sender Agreement( Not required ).
b. Receiver Agreement( NOT Required).
c. Receiver Determination( Sender Service, Outbound Interface, Receiver Service(Integration Process).
d. Interface Determination( Inbound Interface(Sender Abstract Interface), Message Mapping(NOT Required if your using transformation stepin Integration Process)).
3. Now let us configure the Second BPM to Receiver.
a. Sender Agreement( NOT Required)
b. Receiver Agreement( Sender Service(Integration process), Receiver Abstarct Interface,Receiver service, Inbound Interface).
c. Receiver Determination( Sender Service(Integration Process), Receiver Abstarct Interface,Receiver Service).
d. Interface Determination( Inbound Interface, Message Mapping(NOT Required)).
So Finally we have One Receiver Agreement, Two Receiver Determinations, Two Interface Determinations.
Please let me know if you have any more queries.
Regards
Gopi

Doubt : What is the Exact use of Product/SWCV in an integration process?

Hi XI Gurus,
The XI Documentation(Regarding SWCV) says "All design work is organised By SWCV.This makes sense, as interface logically belongs to a Software component Version"
DOUBT 1 :
What is the Exact Use/Role of Product/SWCV in an integration process? - Is it ONLY for DOCUMENTATION purpose? ie., to just understand the underlying Software used ? OR DOES it have a Technical say in the way the Business System behaves ?.
DOUBT 2 :
What will happen if I create a junk Product(I mean something Meaningless), a junk SWCV BUT while creating a Technical System(I choose Type as WEB AS) BASED on the Junk Product/SWCV ,I give VALID hostname etc...I then create a Business System with data valid data .
Now i have created a TS & BS with Valid HOSTNAME & CLIENT etc. BUT based on the junk Product/Junk SWCV.
NOW in integration dir.,will i be able to configure this Business System as Service for Sending IDOCS/FILE(or anything for that matter)?
If It will work then That means The product/SWCV IS ONLY for documentation purpose.Please rply in detail !
DOUBT 3:
When I import the junk SWCV INTO the IntegrationRepository
& choose import of RFC/IDCOC & give valid connection details to a SAP System , Will it import the RFC Regardless of the Junk SWCV I am using ??
DOUBT 4 :
Business System A(Sender) : SAP R/3(For Example)
Business System B(Receiver) : APO (For Example)
ASSUMPTION : Business system A & B have DIFFERENT SWCV.
Now Which Business System's SWCV do I import in my Integration Repository ?The Sender's or Reciever's ?
and Why ??
It would be great if anyone can help me out.
Thanks,
Arun

hi arun..
>>>>>DOUBT 3:
When I import the junk SWCV INTO the IntegrationRepository
& choose import of RFC/IDCOC & give valid connection details to a SAP System , Will it import the RFC Regardless
yes....
>>>>DOUBT 4 :
Business System A(Sender) : SAP R/3(For Example)
Business System B(Receiver) : APO (For Example)
ASSUMPTION : Business system A & B have DIFFERENT SWCV.
Now Which Business System's SWCV do I import in my Integration Repository ?The Sender's or Reciever's ?
and Why ??
...generally, u import only ofr Sender business system cos tht is the system wher u have defined all the objects for the scenario...
and integration process for Receiver is defined..
>>>DOUBT 1 :
What is the Exact Use/Role of Product/SWCV in an integration process? - Is it ONLY for DOCUMENTATION purpose? ie., to just understand the underlying Software used ? OR DOES it have a Technical say in the way the Business System behaves
the product defines the name genaerllly, the SWCV definesd within the product...there can be many SWC in an product...so an SWC is the smallest component in an product...
>>>>>DOUBT 2 :
What will happen if I create a junk Product(I mean something Meaningless), a junk SWCV BUT while creating a Technical System(I choose Type as WEB AS) BASED on the Junk Product/SWCV ,I give VALID hostname etc...I then create a Business System with data valid data .
Now i have created a TS & BS with Valid HOSTNAME & CLIENT etc. BUT based on the junk Product/Junk SWCV.
NOW in integration dir.,will i be able to configure this Business System as Service for Sending IDOCS/FILE(or anything for that matter)?
If It will work then..
...YOU WILL BE ABLE TO.....
REGARDS...
hope it helps...
vishal

Line Split Interface to feed Integration Process - Performance Issues

Hi All
We have a scenario whereby we receive an XML message from a 3rd Party through an exposed SOAP Adapter service. The XML Message has multiple lines that need to be split up and processed as individual messages. We need to create a Line Splitting interface in order to achieve this. The Line Split interface would feed different Integration Processes depending on a specific payload value. The Integration Processes would then perform certain specific logic & Rules as well as transformations to specific message formats (e.g. idoc, xml, flatfile). The Line Split interface also maps from an xml structure that caters for multiple lines, to a flatened xml structure which only contains one line. The uper range of a message we may need to split into individual messages is 30 000 lines.
We first used an Interface Map and used SplitByValue to achieve this, however we ran into the constraint that we could not feed the output split messages to an Integration Process - you can only feed it to Adapters that reside on the J2EE engine.
We then decided to build a seprate Integration Process thats sole purpose was to split the message and route the indvidual messages to other integration processes to perform the logic, business rules and specific transformations. However, the performance of the ccBPM line splitting Integration Process was nowhere near the Interface Map.
e.g. Interface Map Split 1000 Lines = 13 seconds - BPM Integration Process 1000Lines = 100 seconds.
Does anybody have any suggestions on how we can perform the line split outside of BPM, or how we can improve ther performance of the line splitting within BPM?
Thanks for your assistance.
Edited by: CostaC on Aug 24, 2009 11:53 AM

hi,
>>>We first used an Interface Map and used SplitByValue to achieve this, however we ran into the constraint that we could not feed the output split messages to an Integration Process - you can only feed it to Adapters that reside on the J2EE engine.
the easiest (not the only) way :
do the split as you did here and post the results in different folders (file adapter)
then set up scenarios that will get the files from those folders
(many additional objects but will be much much faster and better then a BPM)
you could also split the messages in the adapter module but this is more advanced
and officially SAP does not recommend it - even though it's possible
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Spliting a Message to reuse an Integration Process made for a single one.

Hi,
I have a Integration Process that works well for a XML message of the type:
<EMESSAGE>
<PERSON>
 <TAG_1>
 <TAG_2>
</PERSON>
</EMESSAGE>
My BPM process the data for the Person correctly.
Now I want to be able to tried more than one person per input message, some thing like:
<EMESSAGE>
<PERSON>
 <TAG_1>
 <TAG_2>
</PERSON>
<PERSON>
 <TAG_1>
 <TAG_2>
</PERSON>
<PERSON>
 <TAG_1>
 <TAG_2>
</PERSON>
</EMESSAGE>
I build a 1:n Interface Mapping that creates me the following structure:
<Messages>
<Message1>
<EMESSAGE>
<PERSON>
 <TAG_1>
 <TAG_2>
</PERSON>
</EMESSAGE>
</Message1>
<Message2>
<EMESSAGE>
<PERSON>
 <TAG_1>
 <TAG_2>
</PERSON>
</EMESSAGE>
</Message2>
<Message3>
<EMESSAGE>
<PERSON>
 <TAG_1>
 <TAG_2>
</PERSON>
</EMESSAGE>
</Message3>
</Messages>
But when I use a ForEach Block in my new BPM, it doesn't work if there is more then 1 person in the input. The error message I got is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <MappingTrace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Namespace:http://domain.com/xi/domain_4</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Name:IM_CPM_AbsSync_to_N_CPM_AbsSync</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:3E235261F43111DDB40AC952C0A80C15</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:XSLT</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping has one input message.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Multi mapping required.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Creating XSLT mapping CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Load 3e235261-f431-11dd-b40a-c952c0a80c15, http://domain.com/xi/domain_4, -1, CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage.xsl.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage.xsl (http://domain.com/xi/domain_4, -1) in swcv 3e235261-f431-11dd-b40a-c952c0a80c15.</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Call XSLT processor with stylsheet CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage.xsl.</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Returned form XSLT processor.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">XSLT transformation: CPM_to_N_ContextPersonMessage.xsl completed with 0 warning(s).</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Content Type application/xml</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No interface specified for parameter 2</Trace>
</MappingTrace>
Does someone have any idea or a suggestion on how to reuse my BPM that works for a single person?
Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
greg

ok no success for the moment, so I will try to describe my BPM more precisely:
The DT I use can contain up to 1'000 PERSON record inside a unique EMESAGE reccord (the root element)
My containers: (all are of type Abstract Interface of my DT)
Input (Process)
requestList(Process) Multiline
request(block)
response(block)
Receive Request Step
Message: input
Start Process: Yes
Mode : Async.
Split (Transformation) Step
IM: My Interface that does the 1Message with N PERSON records to N Messsages with 1 PERSON record
Create new transaction: Yes
Source: input
Target: requestList
Block Step
Mode: ForEach
Block Start: New transaction
Block End: New transaction
Multiline_Element: RequestList
CurrentLine: request
No end condition
Inside the block
My Sync Send call to a BAPI
Source: request
Target: response
A final Async Send step
Message: response.
The workflow stop at the Transform step, as if hte fact that many messages come in result could not be handled back. Here are the details for the Interface mapping used in the transformation step:
Source: MyDataTypeAbstractAsynchroneInterface
Occurrence: 1
Destination:
Occurrences: 0:unbounded
Mapping program: the following XSLT:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
 <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
 <xsl:template match="EPERSON">
 <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
 <xsl:for-each select="CONTEXTPERSON">
 <xsl:element name="ns0:Message{position()}">
 <EPERSON xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="ContextPersonMessage">
 <xsl:element name="CONTEXTPERSON">
 <xsl:attribute name="personid"><xsl:value-of select="@personid"/></xsl:attribute>
 </xsl:element>
 
 </EPERSON>
 </xsl:element>
 </xsl:for-each>
 </ns0:Messages>
 </xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Still any suggestions ?
The trace of the error is the same as before, so I won't copy paste it again.

BPM - ERROR while Activating Integration Process

Hi,
I am unable to activate my Integration Process if i use Transformation step between Receiver and Sender step.
The ERROR Log is given below:
Activation of the change list canceled
Check result for Message Mapping Msg_Mapping_BPM_File | http://sap.com/xi/File_BPM_File:
Starting compilation
Compilation complete
Check result for Integration Process Integration_Process_BPM_File | http://sap.com/xi/File_BPM_File:
Expression must return the interface type MI_Outbound
Check result for Integration Process Int_Process_File_BPM | http://sap.com/xi/File_File_BPM:
Source parameter MI_File_Outbound | http://sap.com/xi/File_File_BPM not set
Target parameter MI_File_Inbound | http://sap.com/xi/File_File_BPM not set
Regards,
Prashanth

Hi Prashant,
Pl check if u have used the abstract interfaces in the interface mapping.. I think thats where the problem is.
Regards,
Divya

Handling fault messages in an Integration Process (bpm)

I have a bpm in PI 7.11 which performs a synch call to an external webservice. In addition to the request/response, that webservice can also generate two faults: ObjectNotFoundFault and generalfault. I am having trouble handling these faults - when a fault occurs my handler is not being invoked and thus the bpm process stops/errors. When I look at the underlying process (via txn swi1), I see the exact error text:
"No exception defined for fault message ObjectNotFoundFault http://www.companyb.com/services/olsa_v1_0/"
From what I understand within the bpm synch call step to the webservice I need to do the following to handle the exception/fault:
- put the synch call (to the webservice) into a block
- add an exception branch to that block named let's say A & set the exception handler of that block to be A
- in the exception setting of that synch step, select A
In my case, I don't care about the fault details other than to ensure it does not stop the whole Integration Process, so in my exception branch I don't do anything. I did try adding a control step within it too (as per SAP Press text book).
Is there anything else I need to do here? I am not mapping the returned fault - does the fault need to be mapped (not sure how I would do this given that the synch step uses an abstract interface and therefore to my knowledge no fault mapping can be done)?
There are 2 Notes that describe my issue exactly:
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1484903
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1158699 <-- this one refers more to me, but we already have in 7.11
Can anyone let me know exactly the steps I would perform to handle these faults - does the exception name / handler A above need to be named the actual exception / fault ObjectNotFoundFault?
Any help appreciated.
Thanks,
Keith)?
Any help appreciated.
Thanks,
Keith

Thanks - my scenario I guess is #2 of that blog. But is your take that even if I don't care what is in the fault message, i.e. I don't care about the contents of it but rather I just want to continue on from it, that I still need to perform this java coding? It's not clear to me from what he says - it seems to me he does the java coding to actually capture the contents of the message. I am in fact using the soap axis adapter too, as he is. The screen shot showing the exception branch is basically what I have.
Regards,
Keith

Integration process in File to BPM Scenario

hi,
gud morning. i got a problem while designing a BPM. in designing the integration process in IR, i am not able to get both the abstract interfaces to select from, while defining the container. plz post a solution for this. thank u.

Hi,
In this blog, I have used Business Service created in the integration directory.. This is an abstract . So I need to specify , the Sender and Receiver Interfaces explicitly in the business service. and it doesnot have any entry in the SLD.
But if you create the Business System in the SLD and if you import that into the Integration Directory-->Assign this into your configurations scenario, then this step is not required.
Regd. Importing Integration Process- BPM is kind of Abstract Service.. i.e BPM is acting as a Receiver Service and Sender service both..
i,e Source to BPM ( here BPM is a Receiver)
BPM to Target( here BPM is a Sender Service)
Hope this clarifies..
Regards,
Moorthy

Question on BPM Integration Process

Hello Experts,
I am following this BPM article which is very similar to what I want to do.
We are using PI 7.1 without EP1.
I have an XML to IDoc scenario where my XML's external definition resides in a seperate SCV (SCV1) and my imported IDoc resides in a seperate SCV (SCV2). We did this to follow the Sender-Mapper-Receiver model. We have a different SCV for Mapping which holds MM and OM (SCV3). Now, I have my Abstract Service Interfaces for external definition in SCV1 and abstract interface for IDoc in SCV2. And, Integration Process in SCV1 (no good reason). But, now I am not able to access SCV2 abstract interfaces (IDoc abs) in my Integration Process since it sits in SCV1. I am thinking if I have to crate my external definitions, idoc, abstract service interfaces, MM, OM and Ingtration Process in one SCV instead of having them in three different SCVs. I was trying to follow sender-mapper-reciever model but seems like for BPM you need to have all your stuff in one SCV. Please help if you know how to resolve this issue wiithout getting rid of sender-mapper-receiver concept.
Thank you in advance for your help.
- Mayur

Thanks Jose. I think creating dependencies is a away to go. I also found this this where Stefan suggested same thing.
So, now Sender (SCV1) and Receiver (SCV3) have been added under Mapper (SCV2)'s dependencies list and I will have my BPM Integration Process in the SCV2 which will give me access to both sender and receiver abstract service interfaces.
Re: Software Component Dependencies PI 7.1
Thanks,
Mayur

Integration Process not continuing after Synchronous BAPI call

I have an integration process that splits up a batch file of purchase orders into single purchase order messages. This allows me to use the "ForEach" block to call the synchronous BAPI_PO_CREATE1.
I have managed to get the process to call the BAPI and create the purchase order. The response message arrives back though the abstract synchronous interface and is mapped to the asyncronous response message. After that the process seems to hold where I am expecting it to continue on the process and be appended to a container storage list for mapping to a single return message.
I have not set up any correlation sets as I thought they wouldn't be needed for a sychronous call.
Has anyone got any advice on my approach to this process and how I might fix it.
Thanks in advance

Hi Bhavesh,
There are no errors as such in the SXMB_MONI but it gets as far as the Inbound Message (PE_ADAPTER) stage after the Sych BAPI call.
Also the SOAP Header at this stage seems to be missing "sysnchronous" or "asynchronous" in the SAP:ProcessingMode tags.
The technical workflow is as follows
FTP Batch file outbound to Integratin Process Receive (Async)
Transform message into a Multiline list of BAPI_PO_CREATE1.request (async abstract)
Enter "For Each" Block using the multiline list.
BAPI_PO_CREATE1 mapped to synchronous abstract interface
synchronous abstract interface mapped to BAPI_PO_CREATE.request and response
BAPI_PO_CREATE.response mapped to async BAPI_PO_CREATE.response
async BAPI_PO_CREATE.response appended to multiline list
Exit block
Transform multiline response list into single line response
FTP inbound
As far as I can make out I have not correctly configured the receiver of PO_CREATE1.response after it has been mapped from the sync to async so it just persists it and sits there waiting or it is waiting for somethign else to happen.
Let me know if I can clarify anything further.
Thanks
Ben

Internal error: Link from Integration Process

Hello,
i´ve got a big problem with a process in PI 7.1
When I try to save my process I get this Error Message:
Internal error: Link from Integration Process IP_ASSET_EXCHANGE | http://hiddennamespace.com to object type "ifmextmes" with role "d77b01873ae811de8f28000c294f2f80" is not permitted
For my Abstract interfaces I use External Definitions.
Does anyone has a tip?
Thnx,
Rgds,
Steffen

Hi!
I have same problem.
Have you decided this issue?
Thnx,
Serg

How to configure Integration Directory for Integration process async sync

Hi Experts,
I am confused about doing configuration in Integration Directory i.e receiver determination,interface determination and receiver agreement and sender agreement for my integration process as it involve synchronous send at target side.
In my Scenario , we get Purchase order request(asynchronously) from SRM system in proxy xml format which we have to map to Cxml format send it to third party system(say system 2) as http request.Then we will recieve a response from system2 in Cxml format through HTTP.Now,we have to map this response as to SRM system via proxy code for successful and error case .If error occured we also have to mail to the respective department about the error occured via mail adapter.Proxy to XI is a asynchronous communication and XI to System2 is a synchronous communication .Then again XI to SRM is a asynchronous communication via proxy.I have request and response External defination for Cxml i.e HTTP side.
I have done following integration process in ESR
Start- Receive(1)---Transformation(2)-send(3)-Fork(4)--
stop
...................................................................................................... .....[----Branch 1 [-Transformation(5)-Send(6)-
.......................[-----Branch 2 -
SWITCH STEP to check error code[
............................................................................................................[.otherwise branch of switch
Fork(4)----[
.......................[----Branch 1-Transformation (9)-send(10)-
Here,
Recieve(1) -- is used for recieve request from SRM.Mode is asynchronous
Transforamtion(2)-- is used for operation mapping between request of SRM to HTTP request.
send(3) --is used to sending request synchronous to HTTP,mode is synchronous,used synchronous abstract interface,abstract reqhttp and abstract resphttp
switch-switch Branch1 is used for checking error response to be true---
Transformation(5)--- is used to map HTTP response to Mail response structure
Send(6)----
is used to send mail content to Mail adapter
Transformation(9)---- is used to map HTTP response to Proxy response
Send(10) --- used to send mapped proxy response to SRM as to update status by calling calling Function module using proxy code.
Thanks
Deepak

Deepak,
In BPM data does not flow in Backword direction!
take any step in your BPM the message it is goiong to receive will be what a step just before it is giving to BPM.
Now in your case
IR Part:
You have to call Third part Synchronously and the input to it will be what Proxy has given to you.
Create an Abstract Synchronous(in case of abstract you need not bother it is Inbound or Outbound) in which(I mean the Message Interface) The Output message will be what you have Received from Proxy and the input message will be what you are going to receive from the Third party as a Response. Now you would have Inbound Synchronous Interface created for calling Third party.
Have a Interface Mapping between the Abstract Synchronous and Inbound Synchronous Message Interface.
ID Part:
For synchronous Step: BPM will; be sender with Message Interface Abstarct Synchronous
Third Party will be receiver With Inbound Interface(Synchronous). Use the INterface Mapping between Abstract Synchronous and Inbound Synchronous that You have created in IR.
Have a Receiver Agreement for the Thirs part.
No Sender agreement required in case of BPM as a Sender.
Thanks,
Sunil Singh

Integration Process of abstract interfaces of diff SWCV's

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for