Issue with Mark Up costing in 12.1 CM

Has any one notice that mark up can run into costing issues?
1. If you have Mark Up costed to that same code with more than one entry when collected to a change order it zero's out on the cost work sheet.
2. if you collect mark up from a proposal then add in a new mark up in the change it zero's out everything on the cost worksheet except for the new mark up.
3. If mark up is not costed it will not show up in the not costed cost code.
I have seen a few other issue with it as well. Everything seems to be fine in the contract and change order so you will only notice this if you use cost work sheet.

Are you testing locally?
Have you tried after publishing to the server? If not do so as that will likely make the difference.
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
@petergrainge

Similar Messages

Authorization issue with Company code/ Cost center combination

Hi,
I am currently trying to restrict user access by company code and cost center combination.
We have roles defined for each user and I am trying to use the standard authorization object A_S_KOSTL in this role . It seems that since it is not a 'maintianed' object no activity can be assigned to this autorization object.
currently the values are :
company Code : 1110 , 1112, 1114
Cost Center : *
i am getting sy-subrc as 0 even when i test for company code : 1110 for a user with the above role.
My code is :
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'A_S_KOSTL'
    ID 'BUKRS' FIELD '1110'.
F sy-subrc EQ 0.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'A_S_KOSTL'
ID 'KOSTL' FIELD '*' .
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    MESSAGE 'Success with KOSTL also' TYPE 'S'.
ELSE.
      MESSAGE 'Success with BUKRS only' TYPE 'S'.
ENDIF.
ELSE.
      MESSAGE 'Failure' TYPE 'S'.
ENDIF .
I get a subrc NE 0 for the KOSTL part. The test passes for BUKRS.
Please advise on how to proceed.
Thanks and Regards
Soumya

Okay, I misread the "NE". Sorry.
Have you done a syntax check on it?
Also compare to:
AUTHORITY-CHECK <object>
ID 'KOSTL' '*'.
I cannot confess to ever have done a "full" AUTHORITY-CHECK myself, but it is most likely the same as with DUMMY -> you should not use the FIELD statement as '' value if the data element does not know what a '' is...
Cheers,
Julius

Issue with Mark of the Web, PDFs, and merged WebHelp

I'm sure this has come up before, but I can't locate the definitive answer.
I am using RH8 and have a merged WebHelp system containing a parent projects and 10 or so child projects. Previously, when I generated the WebHelp projects, I selected the Mark of the Web check box for the parent and all the children. Everything seemed to work fine.
Now, I've been asked to create a new child project with links to a large number of PDF files. After reviewing the documents on this forum, I realized I needed to (1) unselect Mark of the Web to see the PDFs in the generated output and (2) change my IE settings to Allow Active Content to Run from Files on PC. Unfortunately, while I can now see PDFs just fine, my merged help is no longer working correctly--the link from the parent topic to a project generated w/o Mark of the Web no longer works. That is:
If Mark of Web selected:
     PDFs don't work
     merged help does
If Mark of Web not selected:
     PDFs work
     merged help does not
How can I make everything work?
Thanks.

Are you testing locally?
Have you tried after publishing to the server? If not do so as that will likely make the difference.
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
@petergrainge

Preview Issues with Marked-up PDF

Marked up PDF's seem to display incorrectly all the time in Preview. I marked-up three PDFs using (1) Bluebeam (2) Adobe Professional and (3) PDF Pen. Each of these files opens perfectly fine in each other software. However Preview displays all three PDF's incorrectly. For e.g., the text is upside down, moved to a different location, arrows pointing to blank space etc. Is there a setting or something that is wrong. How can this be resolved?

Install the latest updates using Software Update and I think you'll find the latest Font fix will resolve your problem.

Issue with Cost center in PO and Work Order

Dear Expert,
I am facing an issue with respect to cost center in Purchase Order and Work Order. The PO is made against a work order. There are two cost center associated with the work order. One is updated under u201CAdditional datau201D field and other is at u201Clocationu201D . So the cost center in PO should essentially be the same one mentioned under u2018locationu2019 field of work order. So the issue here is that while creating PO, the cost center is picked from the u201Cadditional datau201D field of work order not from u2018locationu2019 field of WO.
Is there any exit available that needs to be implemented for overriding the cost center in PO or any other way of solving this problem?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks
Deba

Hi,
I guess that there is already some user exit or enhancement in place, since this doesn't sound like standard SAP (picking the cost data from additional data, or even having it there).
Mario

Issue with report (S_ALR_87013611) that is actual/plan line items for Cost

Hi Gurus,
I am having issue with the report (S_ALR_87013611) that is actual/plan line items for Cost Center.
When i execute the report for a cost element 510200 the amount is 23,380.13, but when i drill down on it by double click on that amount the value in obj curr is 15468.91. Hence there is the differnce. When i futher drill down by double click on the amont of 15468.91 and i go to display group currency and take the total it is 23380.13 and display in local / doc currency the amount is 15468.91. I guess due to this there is difference. The cost center & the cost elements are the same i have checket it.
My concerns is that the group curr is USD and obj curr / local curr is USD. So is group curr and doc curr is USD then when i click on dislay curr and select group curr why the amounts are changing.
Kindly adivce

Try to look if there is any filtering criteria applied in the report to which you drill-down.
The difference can be also caused by the "value type" - some reports show actual and statistical costs together in one column while the others strictly show (are defined to show) only e.g. actual costs (type 04) and not the statistical costs (type 11)

Issue with update of BOM by Variant Config - Cost relevant indicator

Hi All VC Expert,
We are facing an issue with the update by reference characteristic of the field STPO-SANKA Cost relevancy indicator on the BOM.
We are on SAP ECC 6.0 release 700 on Oracle
Hot Package
- SAPKA70015 on ERP Cross Application componenent
- SAPKH60013 on SAP-APPL Logistics and accouting
We are using material variant
We are on the first level of configuration
Classically, we built a procedure to set X to this data base field as below :
$self.STPO_SANKA = 'X'
We assigned this procedure to the relevant items
Here is the result we have:
At the creation of the Plan Order, this is not working
At the creation of the Prod Order, this is not working
When we do a Reload PP master data, this is working very well
On CU50/VA02 when we check the trace, the procedure is executed.
Do somebody have an idea or already facing this and solve it ?
Thanks in advance for your appreciated help.

Hi Fabien. Did you solve your problem?

Issue with reversal of MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost

Hi Xperts
We have found out an issue while reversing the MIRO document for Planned Del costs. When we have done the MIRO, the accounting entry got correctly posted with correct account keys.Conditions are not inventoried.
However, when we had reversed it - the stock account got hit.Do not understand, why that happened.Do you have any clue?
1. Suppose we have done the MIRO for Del Cost & then performed GR.Now Stock has already consumed & afterwards we have found that the MIRO for Del Cost is wrong & reverse - in this scenario shall the Stock account will get a hit????
2. I have maintained Price Control "V" in Material Master.However, I have maintained a Standard Price by mistake.In that case shall SAP ignores the MAP & takes Standard Price into account & post PRD??
Regards
Soumick

Hi,
Before checking Planned Delivery costs accounting documents in MIRO posting and MIRO cancellation document, 1st check how Planned Delivery costs designed for your procurement process.
Use t.code:ME23N, check your Purchase order
Option-1:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account and at the same time Planned Delivery costs posted to Separate Planned Delivery costs G/L account.
OR
Option-2:
Is Planned Delivery costs posted to Planned Delivery costs G/L account ONLY
OR
Option-3:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account ONLY.
Based the above one setting, system will post goods receipt and invoice posting document with corresponding accounting entries. Also cancellation of invoice posting document refer to these setting.But account posting depends on price control available in material master.
NOTE:
Standard price procedure (price control “S”):The system carries out all stock postings at a price defined in the material master. Variances in price are posted to price difference accounts.
Moving average price (price control “V”): The system valuates goods receipts with the purchase order price and goods issues with the current moving average price.Differences in price between the purchase order price and the invoice are posted directly to the relevant stock account if there is sufficient stock coverage.
Regards,
Biju K

Restricting issue of goods to cost center with respect to material type

Dear Users,
I have a requirement like we want to restrict issue of goods to cost center with respect to material type i.e., we want to issue goods to cost center only through reservation and that too only for specific material types. Is there any standard solution for this, please provide your suggestions.
Thanks,
Manoj

Hi Ajay,
Thanks for valuable input.
I also thought in the same line , but user has the following concern on this:
Assessment Cycle: As per Users, it cannot be used because this will allocate based on allocation basis. But they need, the values that was posted at the time of transaction and as per materials. So it wont be accurate through Assessment cycle,
OKB9: They have different Cost center for different valuation area for the same GL Account.
Hence through OKB9 also, we cannot post directly to COPA.
That's the reason the above option were not adopted.
My other concern to this is:
In CKM3, we have two lines under consumption, one for Normal sales PGI and other is Cost Center.
After doing revaluation of consumption in CKMLCP, we see one line under Cost Center :Revaluation of Consumption Figure"
My question, where can I see that figure whether in any table or in Cost Center report??
If that is also available we can try to match those values and post to COPA.
Let me know your thought on this.
Thanks and regards
Kami

Goods Issue with cost

Hello
I am trying to make a goods issue to adjust the inventory, but i want to make it with the real cost of the product.
I have just made a formated search to get the cost of the product, the problem is that if i select the last purchase price list, i update this price with the cost, and i dont want to update the last purchase price.
If i choose another list, for example price list 01, this list doesnt get update with the cost?
Thanks
Jacobo

Hi,
The price list in goods issue document is defaulted the 'last purchase
price', and you could manually change it by select from the drop down
list before you add the document.And you could also manually change the info price column.
However the price list and price in the document is only informative. From the testing we could see that the item's cost will always be
used to calculate released stockvalue and create journal postings.
The item cost and last purchase price will not be affected by adding the
goods issue document.
Best Regards
Helen Sun

Recently upgraded to a Canon Mark 3 and now having issues with my RAW files in Bridge and Photoshop. I am operating with CS4. Photoshop produces an error " Could not complete your request because photoshop does not recognize this type of file"

Recently upgraded to a Canon Mark 3 and now having issues with my RAW files in Bridge and Photoshop. I have operating with CS4. Photoshop produces and error " Could not complete your request because photoshop does not recognize this type of file"

Assuming you mean 5D Mark III, Photoshop CS4 cannot directly open raw files from your camera.
Generally speaking, Adobe stopped updating older versions to be able to read raw files from newer cameras when they released a new major version of Photoshop. Photoshop CS4 is no longer receiving Camera Raw updates.
You can double check this yourself:
First you need to determine whether Adobe has released support for your new camera in your version of Photoshop. To do that, look at these two pages. You'll want to find out the earliest version of Camera Raw that can support your camera, then what version of Photoshop can run that version of Camera Raw.
Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
Camera Raw-compatible Adobe applications
If you find your camera is supported by your version of Photoshop, you need to download the latest update for Camera Raw. There's more information on how to do that here:
Keeping Photoshop Up-To-Date
If your version of Photoshop cannot support your camera, you can download and install the latest version of the free Adobe DNG Converter, which can take your raw files as input and put out DNG format files, which your version of Photoshop can open.
Photoshop Help | Digital Negative (DNG)
The DNG converter DOES work, but if you want maximal quality from your raw files (not to mention the convenience and ease of use of directly opening your raw files) you'll want the latest version of Photoshop. Adobe has made substantial improvements in raw conversion quality in recent years.
-Noel

I think I am having shutter issues with my 5D mark iii. image is vignetting on top of frame.

I think I am having shutter issues with my 5D mark iii. image is vignetting on top of frame. ( left side when shooting portrait).
does not happen all the time. shoot 20 frames, not a problem then will happen 4 or 5 in a row or every other shot for a few shots.
Studio situation with 4 lights but it is not a light issue. subject is dark also. all lights fire at full. happens weather at 1/100 or down to 1/20. these 4 examples were shot at 1/50 f 10 iso 100. raw converted to jpeg. shooting teathered but I dont think that matters. has anyone else had shutter issues? can any one from canon give me any info or help??

It may be that the flash is firing as the shutter is opening... but if you're having an issue with a sticking shutter, the shutter isn't completely open when the flash fires.
If this is the case then it wouldn't matter how long the shutter is open because the flash doesn't provide light continuously when the shutter is open... it only gives a burst. That momentary burst is normally fired at the moment the shutter finishes opening up completely (but if the shutter is sticky and isn't completely finished opening when the flash fires... you'd have a dark edge.)
If you used 2nd curtain shutter so that it doesn't fire until the moment before the shutter is intended to close, you shouldn't see vignetting even if the shutter is sticking.
But this makes me wonder what the shutter count is on your body and if it needs service.
Tim Campbell
5D II, 5D III, 60Da

The co-op have withdrawn the iPad 3 from sale and it will be replaced by a new iPad. Does anyone know if there is an issue with the iPad 3 that would have led to the upgrade? Thanks Mark

Is there an issue with the latest iPad (3)? Why has it been replaced by an upgrade?

No, there's absolutely no issue. I guess the co-op just thought that now that the new iPad is available, and costs the same as the iPad 3 used to cost, it might as well offer the latest.

Issue with Phantom Material in PCE

Hi,
While creating the PCE for one of the finished materials, in the PCE, the phantom material is not getting selected.
There is no issue with the production version or BOM or Master recipe since in the process order after the BOM explosion the phantom material is being picked up.
The costing date of the PCE is also as per the production version validity date. In the BOM & master the phantom item is maintained for costing.
Let me know what else could be missing.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Abhijit

There is no problem with the costing run. If a material is marked as a phantom assembly (that is, it has a special procurement type with procurement type: In-house production and special procurement: Phantom assembly ), costing directly explodes the BOM and calculates the planned costs for all material components in the phantom assembly. These material components are displayed and updated in the cost estimate of the higher-level material, but not in the phantom assembly. The idea is, phantom assemblies are not needed to be costed as they are not valuated and neither stock is maintained for them. But their cost structure is exploded properly for the costing run.

Issue with valuation segment and gl in MB5l

Hi gurus
I have an issue with a couple of materials in a report in MM MB5L list of stock values. The materials they are reporting with the issue have no costing screen extended in MM and I think this maybe the issue. The message I am getting is:
Account 121160 does not exist in company code 0010 G/L accnt is missing for val. segment 000005 1400.
I have checked the account and it does exist in the company code, is there any other config between the segment and gl account.
regards

The transaction is MB5L which is stock values balances. The message is:
Account 121160 does not exist in company code 0010
G/L accnt is missing for val. segment 000005 1400,
There is no message number, no question mark(help) to check the message number either, as it is just text at the bottom of the report showing the error.
I thought it might just be because the costing view was not setup, however not sure why the gl account is coming up as cannot see any postings to this account? It maybe that they have not done the relevant MM configuration. The gl account is a material management account.
thanks

Issue with Mark Up costing in 12.1 CM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for