Issue with Phantom Material in PCE

Hi,
While creating the PCE for one of the finished materials, in the PCE, the phantom material is not getting selected.
There is no issue with the production version or BOM or Master recipe since in the process order after the BOM explosion the phantom material is being picked up.
The costing date of the PCE is also as per the production version validity date. In the BOM & master the phantom item is maintained for costing.
Let me know what else could be missing.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Abhijit

There is no problem with the costing run. If a material is marked as a phantom assembly (that is, it has a special procurement type with procurement type: In-house production and special procurement: Phantom assembly ), costing directly explodes the BOM and calculates the planned costs for all material components in the phantom assembly. These material components are displayed and updated in the cost estimate of the higher-level material, but not in the phantom assembly. The idea is, phantom assemblies are not needed to be costed as they are not valuated and neither stock is maintained for them. But their cost structure is exploded properly for the costing run.

Similar Messages

  • Issue with the material field in ME23N after upgrade

    Hi Experts,
    We are having an issue with transaction ME23N in ECC6.0 after upgrade from 4.6c.
    In this transaction for the given PO the value of the material is not populating. The material coloumn is displaying but the value of the material is not coming.
    For the same PO with the same data we are able to see the material number in ME23N in 4.6c.
    Please help me to resolve this.
    Thanks,
    Rakesh

    Hi,
    If you are a functional consultant then check the configuration settings in SPRO and compare it with the one in 4.6c system to find if the material number display in ME23N is enabled in your new system or not. Go to tcode SPRO and Material Management-> Purchasing->Purchase Order->Define Screen Layout at Document level.
    Execute this and select on ME21N or tcode that you are having problem with. Then press details button and double click on Enjoy fields. Check if it Display check box is ticked or not.
    KR Jaideep,

  • MD04 issue with BOM Material

    HI
    We have a scenario where Sales order is Created with BOM Material. Sales order has been saved, delivered and Billed.
    But still the BOM Material is shown in MD04, we tried running the Correction program SDRQCR21, but still the BOM Material shown in MD04.
    Can anyone help on this issue.
    Thanks

    hi,
    please check,
    whether TECO has been done for production order from PP perspective.
    after this the requriment from MD04 should disappear and finally refresh it.
    you are requested to search the FORUM sir.
    regarsds,
    balajia

  • Issue with creating materialized view

    Hi,
    We have a select query (containing joins, aggregates and UNION ALL’s) using which we are creating materialized views. We were able to create these mat views in development environment, however when tried to run the same scripts in a higher environment the creation never completes. The higher environment has three times more data than in Dev currently.
    The below operations complete well in time , but when we add “CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MAT_VIEW_NAME” to the select query it takes forever (we have cancelled the operation after waiting for more 1 hour)
    Select count(1) from the complete Mat. View query -     takes 3.2 min to complete - the query resullts in      3,010,068 rows
    Create Normal VIEW using complete Mat. View select query -     takes      3.06 sec     to complete
    Create table using complete Mat. View select query     takes 5.75 min to complete - the query resullts in           3,010,068
    Does anyone have an idea why this could be happening ? if you have ever faced this kind of issue, can you please provide pointers on how you were able to solve the problem. We are using Oracle 11g.
    Let me know if I have to provide any other information for you to understand the issue better.
    Thanks

    SELECT vis.uid, findet.yr, findet.ect, vis.ind,
    tm_view.col1_id, tm_view.col1_name,
    tm_view.col2_id, tm_view.col2_name,
    tm_view.col3_id, tm_view.col3_name,
    clnt.cl_id, clnt.cl_nm,
    prodparent_view.parent_cd,
    prodparent_view.parent_desc,
    prod_view.parent_cd,
    prod_view.parent_desc,
    prod_view.child_cd,
    prod_view.child_desc,
    SUM (value1), SUM (value2),
    SUM (value3), SUM (value4),
    SUM (value5), SUM (value6),
    SUM (value7), SUM (value8),
    SUM (value9), SUM (value10),
    SUM (value11), SUM (value12)
    FROM vis,
    (SELECT *
    FROM analytic_e,
    (SELECT table_val
    FROM TAB_CHECK s
    WHERE s.tgt_table_nm = 'ANALYTIC'
    AND s.table_val = 'ANALYTIC_E')
    WHERE table_val = 'ANALYTIC_E'
    UNION ALL
    SELECT *
    FROM analytic_o,
    (SELECT switch_val
    FROM tab_check s
    WHERE s.tgt_table_nm = 'ANALYTIC'
    AND s.switch_val = 'ANALYTIC_O')
    WHERE switch_val = 'ANALYTIC_O') findet,
    prod_view,
    prodparent_view,
    tm_view,
    clnt,
    (select to_number(to_char(ref_dt,'yyyy'))-1 year_agg from DATE_TABLE) tbabt
    WHERE tbabt.yr = findet.yr
    AND vis.cl_key = findet.cl_key
    AND tm_view.hi_key = findet.hi_key
    AND prod_view.child_cd = findet.prod_cd
    AND clnt.cl_key = findet.cl_key
    AND prodparent_view.child_cd = prod_view.parent_cd
    GROUP BY vis.uid, findet.yr, findet.ect, vis.ind,
    tm_view.col1_id, tm_view.col1_name,
    tm_view.col2_id, tm_view.col2_name,
    tm_view.col3_id, tm_view.col3_name,
    clnt.cl_id, clnt.cl_nm,
    prodparent_view.parent_cd
    prodparent_view.parent_desc
    prod_view.parent_cd
    prod_view.parent_desc
    prod_view.child_cd
    prod_view.child_desc
    Higher Environment
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 57M| 65G| | 20M (1)| 66:48:28 | | |
    | 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 57M| 65G| 73G| 20M (1)| 66:48:28 | | |
    |* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 57M| 65G| | 109K (2)| 00:21:58 | | |
    | 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | HIER | 2100 | 244K| | 172 (0)| 00:00:03 | | |
    |* 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | UK_HIER | 2100 | | | 16 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    |* 5 | HASH JOIN | | 57M| 59G| | 109K (1)| 00:21:52 | | |
    | 6 | VIEW | VW_GBF_25 | 1908 | 868K| | 2612 (1)| 00:00:32 | | |
    | 7 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1908 | 141K| | 2612 (1)| 00:00:32 | | |
    | 8 | VIEW | | 45107 | 3347K| | 2609 (1)| 00:00:32 | | |
    | 9 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
    | 10 | HASH UNIQUE | | 22518 | 1473K| 1872K| 1010 (1)| 00:00:13 | | |
    |* 11 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 1473K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    | 12 | HASH UNIQUE | | 22518 | 1165K| 1512K| 947 (1)| 00:00:12 | | |
    |* 13 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 1165K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    | 14 | HASH UNIQUE | | 71 | 1917 | | 652 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 593K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 16 | HASH JOIN | | 64M| 38G| 4936K| 106K (1)| 00:21:16 | | |
    | 17 | VIEW | | 45107 | 4404K| | 2609 (1)| 00:00:32 | | |
    | 18 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
    | 19 | HASH UNIQUE | | 22518 | 1473K| 1872K| 1010 (1)| 00:00:13 | | |
    |* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 1473K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    | 21 | HASH UNIQUE | | 22518 | 1165K| 1512K| 947 (1)| 00:00:12 | | |
    |* 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 1165K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    | 23 | HASH UNIQUE | | 71 | 1917 | | 652 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 24 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 22518 | 593K| | 650 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 25 | HASH JOIN | | 3021K| 1550M| 15M| 24492 (1)| 00:04:54 | | |
    | 26 | PARTITION HASH ALL | | 491K| 10M| | 1059 (1)| 00:00:13 | 1 | 16 |
    | 27 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | VIS | 491K| 10M| | 1059 (1)| 00:00:13 | 1 | 16 |
    |* 28 | HASH JOIN | | 388K| 190M| 6056K| 12929 (1)| 00:02:36 | | |
    | 29 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CLNT | 64540 | 5294K| | 411 (1)| 00:00:05 | | |
    |* 30 | HASH JOIN | | 388K| 159M| | 4072 (1)| 00:00:49 | | |
    | 31 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DATE_TABLE | 2 | 16 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    | 32 | VIEW | | 582K| 235M| | 4065 (1)| 00:00:49 | | |
    | 33 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
    | 34 | NESTED LOOPS | | 272K| 52M| | 1860 (1)| 00:00:23 | | |
    |* 35 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TAB_CHECK | 1 | 46 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    |* 36 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | SYS_C0041157 | 1 | | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    | 37 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 272K| 40M| | 1859 (1)| 00:00:23 | 1 |1048575|
    | 38 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ANALYTIC_E | 272K| 40M| | 1859 (1)| 00:00:23 | 1 |1048575|
    | 39 | NESTED LOOPS | | 309K| 58M| | 2205 (1)| 00:00:27 | | |
    |* 40 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TAB_CHECK | 1 | 46 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    |* 41 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | SYS_C0041157 | 1 | | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    | 42 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 309K| 44M| | 2204 (1)| 00:00:27 | 1 |1048575|
    | 43 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ANALYTIC_O | 309K| 44M| | 2204 (1)| 00:00:27 | 1 |1048575|
    Development
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1696K| 1276M| | 291K (1)| 00:58:20 | | |
    | 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1696K| 1276M| 1325M| 291K (1)| 00:58:20 | | |
    |* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 1696K| 1276M| | 9721 (2)| 00:01:57 | | |
    | 3 | VIEW | | 15464 | 1132K| | 1855 (1)| 00:00:23 | | |
    | 4 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
    | 5 | HASH UNIQUE | | 7681 | 502K| | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 502K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    | 7 | HASH UNIQUE | | 7681 | 375K| | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 375K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    | 9 | HASH UNIQUE | | 102 | 2448 | | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 180K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 11 | HASH JOIN | | 371K| 252M| | 7847 (2)| 00:01:35 | | |
    | 12 | VIEW | | 15464 | 1510K| | 1855 (1)| 00:00:23 | | |
    | 13 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
    | 14 | HASH UNIQUE | | 7681 | 502K| | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 502K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    | 16 | HASH UNIQUE | | 7681 | 375K| | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 17 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 375K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    | 18 | HASH UNIQUE | | 102 | 2448 | | 618 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 19 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 180K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 20 | HASH JOIN | | 122K| 71M| | 5987 (2)| 00:01:12 | | |
    |* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | HIER | 7681 | 915K| | 617 (1)| 00:00:08 | | |
    |* 22 | HASH JOIN | | 122K| 57M| 4512K| 5368 (2)| 00:01:05 | | |
    |* 23 | HASH JOIN | | 9556 | 4395K| 3856K| 2409 (2)| 00:00:29 | | |
    | 24 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CLNT | 74426 | 2979K| | 310 (1)| 00:00:04 | | |
    |* 25 | HASH JOIN | | 9556 | 4012K| | 1710 (2)| 00:00:21 | | |
    | 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DATE_TABLE | 1 | 7 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    | 27 | VIEW | | 19112 | 7894K| | 1706 (2)| 00:00:21 | | |
    | 28 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | | | |
    | 29 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 19111 | 4068K| | 1701 (2)| 00:00:21 | | |
    |* 30 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TAB_CHECK | 1 | 49 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    | 31 | BUFFER SORT | | 248K| 40M| | 1698 (2)| 00:00:21 | | |
    | 32 | PARTITION RANGE ALL| | 248K| 40M| | 1698 (2)| 00:00:21 | 1 |1048575|
    | 33 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ANALYTIC_E | 248K| 40M| | 1698 (2)| 00:00:21 | 1 |1048575|
    | 34 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 1 | 537 | | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    | 35 | PARTITION RANGE ALL | | 1 | 488 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 |1048575|
    | 36 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ANALYTIC_O | 1 | 488 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1 |1048575|
    | 37 | BUFFER SORT | | 1 | 49 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    |* 38 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TAB_CHECK | 1 | 49 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    | 39 | PARTITION HASH ALL | | 810K| 16M| | 1456 (2)| 00:00:18 | 1 | 16 |
    | 40 | MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL | VIS | 810K| 16M| | 1456 (2)| 00:00:18 | 1 | 16 |
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Issue with Customer Material Number in sales order

    Hi All,
    I am facing one strange issue.
    Accoding to the flow of my client system the customer Material number is automaticlly populated while creating the line item in sales order. The Customer Material number come from the Configuration of the Item.
    This is working properly in the quality system but in the prodcution system for some cases this customer material number is not coming.
    The customer material is not coming in production only some times other wise it works properly.
    I am  not able to understand what may be the issue as it  is working properly in the quality and in the procudtion it is not coming only for some line item.
    Kindly help.

    That depends on either configuration used in your system or any enhamcement used.
    So check the cases for which they have configured it or used any enhancement.

  • Goods Issue with reference to Material document

    Hello,
    I would like to create Goods Issue with reference to material document (Transfer Posting document) , but the following message appears :
    "Selected material document does not correspond with action to be executed".
    Is it possible to create Goods Issue with reference to Transfer Posting (mov.type 311 - from stor.loc. to stor.loc.)  ?
    Thanks

    Thanks,
    probably I'll have to find another way to solve this business requirement of copying the transfer document data in GI.
    We have an auto created transfer postings via interface from another system and the main idea was to use already entered fields in transfer posting document such as material , quantity , text , goods recepient , etc. and not to enter them twice when GI should be created. In our case (it's a case for certain materials) it's always 1:1 relationship, so the idea was to facilitate the job of creating the GI, because GI should contain the same data as in transfer posting document.

  • Issue with complete refresh on materialized view when using rownum

    Hi all,
    I had an issue with rownum when using complete refresh
    I am using rownum when creating materialized view and it is generation correctly.But the issue was when i am refreshing the same ,rownum was not getting sorted in ascending order.
    anyone had come across this scenario

    rownum is determined as the row is output, so "order by rownum" does literally nothing.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/pseudocolumns009.htm

  • Issue with scanners beeping on over picking material code

    Hi ,
    I have an issue with scanner beeping.User is working is Z tcode .
    The followings are related steps.
    (1)If the user does over-picking the material code , an “information” window like below is displayed, however, no beep sound is produced.
    Information. Material code, ABC!@#% already updated for Delivery 1ASEDFD.
    (2)Since the user has heard no beep sound, the user is unaware of the over-picking and scans the next item.
    (3)Then, in case of XP PC, a louder noise, a kind of buzzer is generated, while in with Windows 7 PC, a small noise, a kind of chime is made.
    (4)With Windows 7 PC, due to the small sound, the user continues the next step, being unaware of the over-picking. This has a risk of causing errors at the shipment: eventually, it impacts customers.
    The requirement is beep sound will be heard on over-picking also.
    Please suggest in this regard.
    Thanks,
    Harsh

    Hi Harshavarddan,
    there is some example on forum for generating beep sound with the use of the OLE Objects:
    Try this code:
    TYPE-POOLS: ole2.
    DATA: return  TYPE i,
           sapinfo TYPE ole2_object.
    DATA: BEGIN OF command,
             command(12) TYPE c VALUE 'cmd /c echo ',
             hex07(1)    TYPE x VALUE '07',
           END OF command.
    START-OF-SELECTION.
       CREATE OBJECT sapinfo 'SAPINFO' NO FLUSH.
       CALL METHOD OF sapinfo 'EXEC' = return
         EXPORTING
         #1 = command
         #2 = 0.
    FREE sapinfo.
    Regards,
    Angelo.

  • Subcontracting child material issue with SO ref

    Hi all,
    As per the client business scenario we are using MTO for all production/purchase process, In between the production process the material also going to subcontract for some process and coming back as new material. As i mentioned earlier all material movement with ref to sale order only.
    So, the child material in SO stock, created the subcontract PO through MRP by using Item cat - L and Account Assignment - M, with child material, system is recoganising the subcontract consumption with ref to SO in 543 mvt type. but while sending the material from plant through 541 system is not able to recoganise (since there is no special stock assigned in value string OMJJ).
    How to make the Sale order reference as manditory while GI (541/542) and GR (101/102/543/544/545/546) of subcontracting.
    Request your valuable suggestions
    Regards
    Sridharan

    Hi,
    Please refer below link...
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a04ec1a0-c39b-2c10-6889-f6f69625f3f3?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    Kuber

  • Production order confirmation with Phantom Assy through CO11N

    Hi,
         We are trying use phantom assy in our production order, we have one BOM with 17 assy, now we have marked our 17 assy with special procurement as 50, we released order for the same, i confirm 10 machine say out of 15 machine through CO11N, now when i m trying to confirm remaining 5 machine through same CO11N system showing error, screen shot of which is attached,
    I tried to solve this issue, with some note in SCN but didnt able to solve it, i tried by removing back flush indicator for all Phantom assy but same error, i also tried to do partial confirmation in CO11N screen but no use, all the component are marked for Back flush indicator,
    Please help if any configuration i m missing in here, how can i start use this phantom assy, as releasing 17 order for assy is such a pain,
    Thanks,
    Pratik..

    Hi Pratik,
            You said that Auto GRN was done. Could you please clarify that do you have separate order for your assy( 15 machine as per your statement)? or you have a single order with 15 operations?
       I assume that you have separate order as you mentioned that auto GR was done. The message is clearly saying that without GI you can't do confirmation. So, please check whether GI was done against this order. If you remove the backflush indicator then you should do the GI manually against the order before doing Confirmation. Did you check the material movement against this order with 261 movement?
    Did you check any backlog record against this movement in COGI?
        It seems that customized error message, you can easily find the cause when debug this program with the help of your abaper. Please check all these things.
    Thanks

  • Issue with creation of COPA document

    Hi
    Can you please look into the following scenario and provide inputs on the issue
    Single Finished Material Number in SAP for both plant
    Plant 1 (Co Code 1000)u2013 Trading Material
    Plant2 u2013Co Code 2000) Manufactures Material
    Plant 2 manufacture Material and sell it to plant 1 and plant 1 sell it to third party. How can we create the COPA document at the time of billing (OTC) for plant 1
    We do nt want to run the Std Cost Estimate for Plant 1.
    thanks in advance
    kind regards
    sap student

    Hi
    If this scenario is applicable always i.e. Plant 2 will always make and Plant 1 will always sell, then you dont need to release cost estimate in Plant 1
    1. Maintain Price Control V in Plant 1 so that it will accet the Std Price of Plant 2 whenever you do the GR
    2. Create a Costing Key in Ke40 and specify the cost estimate Plant = PLANT 2... DO NOT check the radio button "use line item plant as cost estimate plant)... With this, whenever billing hapens from Plant 1, it will pick the Std cost of Plant 2
    br, Ajay M

  • Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?

    Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?

    Thanks Kelly,
    The answers would be the following:
    1200 cells per custom section (NEW COUNT), and up to 30 custom sections per spec.
    Assuming all will be populated, and this would apply to all final material specs in the system which could be ~25% of all material specs.
    The cells will be numeric, free text, drop downs, and some calculated numeric.
    Are we reaching the limits for UI performance?
    Thanks

  • Performance Issues with SDV03V02

    Hi,
      The order rescheduling program(SDV03V02) runtime is too long. We have searched for notes in the OSS database but have not found any suitable notes. One of the oss notes suggested implementing indexes on VAPMA and VBUK but that has not helped either. We are thinking of writing a Z program which would submit the standard SAP program into multiple jobs-The Z program would schedule the program into multiple jobs using different sets of materials.
      Has anyone faced runtime issues with this program? Any other suggestions?
    Regards,
    Aravind

    Aravind,
    the program invokes availability check for all backourders based on material.
    I would check the following :
    - how many documents it's going to process ?
    - if the number of documents is too big and there are really old docs - you may have a problem with order status update (your order never goes to "complete" status even if all items are rejected or fully shipped - just an example)....
    - if you really need to reschedule many orders - you'll have to consider parallel rescheduling.... BUT it's not as simple as submit parallel jobs for different materials (material ranges)....as jobs will very likely fail due to a contention.
    - another option to speed up the process (may really help) is to change timing of all order outputs which are set to process immediately to '1' -> to  be processed via RSNAST00, then schedule a job after your rescheduling is complete to process all these outputs. It may really help as you separate output processing from avail.check/order save.... and since same order may be saved several times during rescheduling -> it may really help. You can do it by defining a "timing" routine for your output types.
    - always good to run SQL trace or to just monitor this job in SM50 to see what it's doing... OR run it under new USER ID and check statistics for that ID to see which programs/tables took the most time.
    Would be good to measure an average order processing time (check how many orders were processed in this job... I hope it has this info in the spool or you can calculate it based on messages in job log). It may help to determine if the problem is casued by too slow order processing or just by increased order volume.
    There are many options to look at regarding rescheduling...but I would start from order processing performance.

  • Performance issues with Bapi BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY...

    Hello,
    I have a Z program to check ATP which is working with Bapi BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY....
    As I am in the retail system we have performance issues with this bapi due the huge amount of articles in the system we need to calculate the ATP.
    any  way to  improve  the  performance?
    Thanks and best regards
    L

    The BAPI appears to execute for only one plant/material, etc., at a time, so I would have to concentrate on making data retrieval and post-bapi processing as efficient as possible.  In your trace output, how much of your overall time is consumed by the BAPI?  How much by the other code?  You might find improvements there...

  • Hey, I'm having a hardware issue with my Ipod Charger.

    Hello Apple community! I am having a issue with charging my 3rd Gen 64GB I Touch. I used to get an error where it wouldn't allow me to charge due to the accessory not being compatible to the i Touch (I used 3 different Apple Charger, Apple brand,etc) Now I can't charge it at all, its basically a broken Ipod. Im furious about this because I don't have a warranty despite this being a hardware issue. I went to look at Apple support but it said I had to pay $30 to call/email. I think thats ridiculous! I have an issue with my device and I should be able to call for FREE. Does anyone have any ideas on how I could get this expensive device fixed? I have no APPLE Store near me to go to.

    - Have you tried a reset. Nothing is lost
    Reset iPod touch: Hold down the On/Off button and the Home button at the same time for at
    least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
    - Tried a different cable?
    - Looked at the dock connector on the iPod. look for abnormalities like bent or corrode contacts, foreign material and crack or broken plastic.

Maybe you are looking for