Item Classes in OPM R12

Hi,
We have done an upgrade from 11i to R12. I am not able to map few columns from the table : IC_ITEM_MST_B to a table in R12.
The columns are :
1) GL_CLASS
2) INV_CLASS etc
All Item classes are converged to item categories, but I am not able to map these classes to mtl_item_cat table.
Thanks
Shanku

Dear friend
If you maintain your bills of material in any organization other than the Item Validation Organization, you need to ensure the consistency between the bills. A common practice is to set up the bill in the item primary manufacturing organization, then common it in all other organizations that need to use it.
If an operating unit has multiple OE responsibilities, then those OE responsibilities must have the same OE validation organization in order for AutoCreate Configuration to work properly.
Regards
Raj
Satyam TM

Similar Messages

  • MTO in OPM R12

    Hi,
    How does Make-to-Order scenario work in OPM R12.
    I tried defining an item as ATO type, but it requires bill.
    Pl Help.

    Dear friend
    If you maintain your bills of material in any organization other than the Item Validation Organization, you need to ensure the consistency between the bills. A common practice is to set up the bill in the item primary manufacturing organization, then common it in all other organizations that need to use it.
    If an operating unit has multiple OE responsibilities, then those OE responsibilities must have the same OE validation organization in order for AutoCreate Configuration to work properly.
    Regards
    Raj
    Satyam TM

  • Reflection errors in Field Data Edit Scripting context(Line Item class)

    Hello Experts,
    I have a script that does some validation in the Field Data Edit Scripting context of the "Line Item" class, and I  have "MATERIAL" as my target. when i try throwing an Application Exception in this context I get a reflection error message box instead of the message I have passed to the Application Exception constructor.
    your help will be greatly appreciated.
    kind regards,

    One thing to be aware of is that no matter how you choose to construct your exception in field, field data edit and collection scripts, the attribute is always set to the be the taget field/collection. Have you noticed that? The script designers made things that way. What's going on here is that the exception raised in the Interprer is caught by the Script Manager and rethrown with the script target as the attribute and your raised exception as the exception.
    One other thing I would point out is that scripts set to execute on the Collection Member Lifecycle event tend to be poor performers.  You can get a faster result if you edit whole collection and chain the errors onto one ChainException. I can only speculate as to why, but I have seen major improvements in complex scripts if I iterate the whole collection, versus implementing a collection memeber lifecycle validate event. This is counter-intuitive, but there it is.
    Finally, exceptions raised in Collection Lifecycle Events that interupt the overall save process in the prescence of parent document Lifecycle Validation events can result in partially saved data. I observed this issue a few years back and it may be resolved now. The only member lifecycle event I use is Created, to lock, default, etc.
    So, for your particular problem, you may want to rethink your strategy and see if you can get things to work for you bypassing that reflection issue. If you still can't raise the exception on MATERIAL, maybe you can raise it on another field, because another advantage of this approach is that you have full control to raise any error on any field on the Line Items.

  • Change documents for item class 015

    Dear Experts,
    Kindly guide me how to get change documents for notification item class 015.
    THANKS & REGARDS

    Hi,
    All the changes in the documents will be located in CDPOS and where as the status change documents are located in JCDS.
    What we have to do is to enter the  correct object number.
      i think by this you get the issue resolved.

  • Access Custom Configuration Item Class property in Data Warehouse database

    Is there a way to access properties on a custom 'Configuration Item Class' in the DW database?
    When creating a new CI class eg. 'Monitors' and extending this with a property like 'Serial' is there a way to access this in the DW database?
    I can find Displayname and AssetStatus in the ConfigItemDim table, but is there a way to get the other custom created properties?

    Ok !
    Are you read this post ? :
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/8434e129-b969-451e-875c-f120d7b31d36/dw-reporting-on-custom-class?forum=systemcenterservicemanager
    Remy BOVI

  • Item Class removed during import of EEX

    I have amended the SQL for a custom folder and this custom folder has one item class and is joined to two other folders. In my export I have included the BA, the three folders and the item class. When I import this EEX to a support environment the item class is deleted. If then import the EEX a second time the item class is recreated.
    Has anyone seen this behaviour before? Is there any way to resolve/prevent this? I don't believe the export strategy is at fault as I have migrated 100's of objects in this manner. What is most strange is that the item class clearly exists in the EEX as it is creating it on the second import.
    I am using the Refresh object: preserve display related properties option and objects are being matched by identifier. These are the standard choices for all our migrations.
    Thanks,
    Nic

    Hello Nic
    I frequently need to import EEX files a second time and do it regularly. This is because of a round-robin scenario where item classes are shared between folders. So if folder A is imported before folder B and the item class is driven from folder B it will not be attached to the items in folder A. If I now do the import a second time then because the item class already exists when folder A is iimported the system sees that the LOV is there and hooks it back in.
    Hope this behind the scenes explanation and Rod's previous posting help.
    Best wishes
    Michael

  • Item Class question

    I've created a custom folder with the following code to get a LOV for days of week.While creating the item class I didnt ask it to sort the values but still it gives me the value in alphabetical order. When i tried to run the same query in sql it was also giving me in alphabetical order by default. Is there any turn around which would allow me to give the user in the right way starting with Sunday(SU).
    SELECT 'SU' REGION FROM sys.dual
    UNION
    SELECT 'M' REGION FROM sys.dual
    UNION
    SELECT 'T' REGION FROM sys.dual
    UNION
    SELECT 'W' REGION FROM sys.dual
    UNION
    SELECT 'TH' REGION FROM sys.dual
    UNION
    SELECT 'F' REGION FROM sys.dual
    UNION
    SELECT 'S' REGION FROM sys.dual

    Thanks Ott Karesz it works!.
    I've one more problem with this. I'm using this Item Class in one of my condition so that user can pick one or more values which are being passed to a function. When I create a condition and allow user's to select multiple value's and I try to pass it my function I see that only first value is being passed. If the user selects SU,M,T and when I try to pass the parameter values to the function and return back the same i see that only first value SU is being passed. Why aren't the rest of the values being passed to my function.
    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION Disco_Test(P1 IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR IS
    PARAM1 VARCHAR2(250);
    BEGIN
    PARAM1:=P1;
    RETURN PARAM1 ;
    END;
    Thanks for all help.

  • Activating 'change documents' for notification item class 015

    Dear Experts,
    Kindly help me in activating  'change documents' for notification item class 015.
    Thanks and Regards,
    R N Sabat

    Hi R N Sabat
    The creation of change documents for the classification has to be
    activated for every class type. Go please to the customization of the
    appropriate class type:
    Cross-Application Components
    -> Classification System
      -> Classes
       -> Maintain Object Types and Class Types
    You will find there a flag to activate change documents.
    As a precondition you'll have to activate the flag 'Multiple objects
    allowed' before. If you already have classified objects
    for this class type these classifications has to be converted before.
    For the conversion of already existing classifications use please report
    RCCLUKA2. It processes the conversion and sets the flag 'Multiple
    objects allowed'. Regard please the documentation of report RCCLUKA2.
    Thereafter you'll be able to activate change documents for this class
    type.
    Please check the 2 notes :
    80907 Setting the several objs.for each class type indctr
    65124 Classification Change Documents
    If you have any questions , please let me know .
    Enda.

  • Create item class for Number values

    Hi,
    I want to create a item class for year like (current year+3).
    So i created the Item class in Dis.Admin But it wont reflect in Dis.plus parameter . So please tell me how to create a item class for Number values.
    Regards
    Manikandan

    Hi Rod
    I rarely use Desktop and neither do my customers, unless they are on versions of Discoverer prior to 10.1.2. Time and time again I have taught 10.1.2 Plus / Viewer to dyed in the wool Desktopees to finish the course for them to say that they are never going to use Desktop again.
    One of the many issues with Desktop is the caching and even though it can do some things that Plus cannot, the many features in Plus that don't exist in Desktop far outweight them.
    What do you think? Do you still see a use for Desktop?
    How about everyone else? I would love to hear from you.
    Best wishes
    Michael

  • Item Classes - large tables - query timeouts!!!

    Hi,
    I've been building a series of Item Classes in Discoverer 4.1. Admin Tool on a reasonably large set of tables - but some of the Item Classes timeout before the list of values are retrieved.
    Discoverer continually tells me to go and set values for the query govenor - but I've already done this (15minute warning, 60 minute timeout).
    Does the Admin Tool have another place to configure the Query Govenor - other than Tool -> Privileges -> Query Govenor Tab...
    I've been able to fool the database by running a SQL*Plus query (resulting in a cached result set) for the smaller tables, but the Item Classes based on the larger table will not return.
    I've reviewed the 'LOV that works more like the LOV in Oracle Forms' thread and the Database Function and Custom folder solutions will work - but I'd prefer to fix the problem at its source. Is it possible Discoverer requires an index on every column used as an item class?
    Can anyone help me?
    thanks,
    Lance

    Have a look at the timeout value specified in the registry key:
    \\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\ORACLE\Discoverer\Database\ItemClassDelay
    By default it is 20 seconds.
    Metalink Note refers:
    http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=1040079.6
    You're probably safer using your lookup tables to generate LOV's anyway, since you have no guarantee that an LOV generated from a particular field in your table will contain all of the possible values available in the lookup table.

  • Unable to obsolete an item class entry in Building Block

    I have a folder (CN_PROC_AUD_FL) under CN product.
    It has couple of item classes.
    In that we need to obsolete an item class. To obsolete an existing item class, I need to check the obsolete check box correspondig to that Item class.
    But unfortunately, the 'obsolete check box' is disabled.
    More Info:
    1. During our earlier releases these building blocks were frozen
    (frozen check box is checked). But now when we query these building
    block entries, the frozen check box is unchecked and disabled.
    2. Now, we have 2 issues:
    Issue 1: frozen Check box is showing unchecked for the frozen
    building block entries. ANd this check box is disabled.
    Issue 2: The obsolete check box is disabled. Due to this issue,
    we are unable to obsolete any unwanted builing block entries.
    Why is it bahaving like this ?

    I have a folder (CN_PROC_AUD_FL) under CN product.
    It has couple of item classes.
    In that we need to obsolete an item class. To obsolete an existing item class, I need to check the obsolete check box correspondig to that Item class.
    But unfortunately, the 'obsolete check box' is disabled.
    More Info:
    1. During our earlier releases these building blocks were frozen
    (frozen check box is checked). But now when we query these building
    block entries, the frozen check box is unchecked and disabled.
    2. Now, we have 2 issues:
    Issue 1: frozen Check box is showing unchecked for the frozen
    building block entries. ANd this check box is disabled.
    Issue 2: The obsolete check box is disabled. Due to this issue,
    we are unable to obsolete any unwanted builing block entries.
    Why is it bahaving like this ?

  • Importing Custom folder/item class gives warning

    Hi
    When i trying to import custom folder in admin it gives me warning indicating that imported successfully but not in Business areas. now it shows in folder list but not in associated BA. so i have to manually assigned it to BA by selecting manage folders. Same thing happened with item class. it imported successfully but selected item was missing and it shows LOV in item class but when i select edit item class and i saw that selected item was empty.
    Is it bug?
    Plz help me.
    Thanks,
    Jay

    Hi Jay
    I really do understand and again I sympathize. Let me state the correct approach and you will see how your organozation is deviating from what other companies do.
    Most organizations that I work with have a single production environment. Under that they have a pre-production or QA environment, with further environments for development, test and training. They would never attempt to migrate to production without going through QA first, knowing also that QA was a copy of production that was refreshed not so long ago.
    There would also be only one development environment and one test environment. It is not a good idea to have developers working on their own private EUL as this WILL cause issues during migration.
    There's nothing to stop two developers working inside the same development EUL providing they are in different business areas. Its not wise to attempt multiple edits to the same business area at the same time as this makes for extremely difficult user testing.
    Now, if you do decide to continue using multiple development EULs you must not migrate from these straight into production. You must migrate into the QA area first where you can test and make sure that no upset has occurred. Whenever something goes to production from QA it is imperative that those same changes be propogated to all of the other EUL instances otherwise you are asking for trouble.
    Does any of this help?
    Best wishes
    Michael

  • OPM R12 differences from OPM R11

    I'm sure this has been answered in the past somewhere in this forum. I am having trouble finding one concise link or document that notes the difference between OPM R12 and 11.5.10. I can only find small bits here and there. Please provide if you have such link or document.
    Robert Lovell
    [email protected]

    Differences in releases are documented in Release Content Documents (RCDs)
    MOS Doc 416162.1 - Getting Started With R12 - Process Manufacturing (OPM) Support Enhanced RCD
    HTH
    Srini

  • What's the difference of Item Class value:Header and Line Item in AME Rule

    Hi All,
    when creating a Rule or Attribute,there is a Item Class property,which contains Header and Line Item two values.
    Can anybody pls help me clarify the difference?
    thx,
    edmund.

    This information can be found in the Approvals Management implementation guide in metalink. The part number for this document is B31622-02
    Regards

  • How to search item classes

    Hi,
    Is there a way to search for a specific item class in the item classes list? Neither I could find a way to sort them, so it is more pain to search for a specific item class.
    Thanks.

    Hi Puppethead
    this is true and is exactly what I did when I first started working with Discoverer. However, not everyone has that business area installed.
    For anyone wondering what we are talking about, here is a workflow:
    1. Launch SQL*PLUS as EUL owner
    2. Locate and execute this file: EUL5.SQL - you will find it here:
    $ORACLE_HOME/discoverer/util - usually: C:\oracle\BIToolsHome_1\discoverer\util
    3. Exit SQL*PLUS and launch Discoverer Administrator
    4. From the menu bar, select File | Import
    5. Click Add File
    6. Locate this file: EUL5.EEX - you will find it here:
    $ORACLE_HOME/discoverer - usually: C:\oracle\BIToolsHome_1\discoverer
    7. Click Next
    8. Accept all default and click Next
    9. Click Start (located top right)
    10. When done - click Finish
    11. You will now see a new business area called The Discoverer V5 EUL
    You should now be able to log into Desktop or Plus as the EUL owner and run the workbooks that were also installed by the above process. There are four of these, called:
    EUL Access
    EUL Data Definition
    EUL Query Statistics
    EUL Workbook Management
    The one you want in order to look at the list of values is called EUL Data Definition. Open this and look at the worksheet called Item Classes.
    I hope this helps
    Best wishes
    Michael Armstrong-Smith
    URL: http://learndiscoverer.com
    Blog: http://learndiscoverer.blogspot.com

Maybe you are looking for