Missing Adminitrative Line for approval

When a user goes to PWA home page he sees this :
There are 2 Admin time off requests. But when he goes to approval center he sees only 1 Admin Item.
We have confirmed that NO FILTER is applied and also confirmed permissions. it seems like somewhere something might be stuck, but do not see anything related in the queue. We can also not confirm exactly when the issue started happening as the user is also
not sure.
Would appreciate your feedback on this.
Andre
http://av-epm.blogspot.com

What you could do is to go to the approval center - history - timesheet, and see the pending timesheets.
Then either you make a query for the administrative time for timesheets where the user is the timesheet manager, or you can go manually checking for the team members who have the user as timesheet manager and check for their administrative time.
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, MCP |

Similar Messages

Missing Subject line for the Approval Notification Mail

Hi,
We use CUP 5.3 SP7. We have configured the system for role based approval. We found that the approval notification mail being sent without any Subject line. It's configurable to set the admin mail id, but couldn't find one to set the Subject.
We get the following content in the mail....
View <http://<host:port>/AE/index.jsp?verifyApproverLogin.do........................>
Can we set it somewhere from the configuration?
Regards, Anil

Hi Alpesh,
Thx for your reply..But i think you missed my point...Let me try to explain it again...
When we submit a request, the system triggers a notification mail to the approver(s). And this mail seems to be missing a Subject line... and it's shown to be sent from the System E-mail id we set at the SMTP server config.
I couldn't find a tab for setting the E-mail format for the first approver neither at the stage nor in the e-mail reminder configuration.
Perhaps, setting the next approver will help if i had a secondary approver. But we are using a single stage WF in CUP. Am i missing some config step here?
Regards,
Anil

Is it possible Line level approval in AME for purchasing requisition?

hi
is it possible Line level approval in AME for purchasing requisition ?
so that send each line to separate approver ?

If using AME, it should be possible. Check AME Guide for POs for details. Let me know if you run into issues.
Thanks
Shree

Is it possible Line level approval for purchasing requisition in AME?

hi
is it possible Line level approval for purchasing requisition in AME?
so that send each line to separate approver ?

If using AME, it should be possible. Check AME Guide for POs for details. Let me know if you run into issues.
Thanks
Shree

Strange issue with Notes For Approval field

Hi All,
Scenario one:
While creating the shopping cart , in step3 screen there appers s a label Notes For Approval
but the inputfield next to it was disabled and the creator can not enter any remarks in it.
Login as approver , click on Approval link, click the magnifying glass icon in approval table.In the detail view , in lower part of screen under Additional Specifications tab thers is Add Note button .On clicking this button nothing happens , i mean no new text field appears on the screen for enetering remarks by the approver while approving or rejecting the cart.
Due to above mentioned issue i modified the template SAPLBBP_SC_UI_ITS 140 of BBPSC01 as follows.
`T D(class="data")`<text area styl e="font-family:arial;font-size:11px;" na me="TEXT_LINE:66[]" cols="66" ro ws="6" wr ap="physical" titl e="`#APPR_INFO`">`rep eat with r in TEXT_LINE;write (r, "\r\n");end`</te xtarea>
the code above was commented in the template , i uncommented it . After this modifications while creating the shopping cart in step3 screen , a new textfield appeared next to the disabled textfield .
Also in approver login , on clicking the Add Note button a textfield started appearing next to the disabled inputfield.
But in approver login this textfield alwasy contains a default text .Only this deault text is visible in the creator's check status of this shoping cart.
Scenario Two
Aftre modifying the template a new textfield appears next to the disabled inputfield while creating the shopping cart , if we enter some text in this textfield and order the shopping cart then in the approval login on click of Add Note button two text fields appear otherwise only textfield appears.
How to enable the standard textbox without modifying the template.
I know the things I am trying to desribe are very complex but hope some one could help me on this.
Please guide me on this.
Regards,
Anubhav

Hi Swati,
Looks like the template was modified beforw I started working on it.I compared the template code in dvelopment with previous version and found some lines were missing , copied the missing lines and now it is working fine.
Thanks a lot for the help,
Anubhav

Issue With Notes for Approval

Hi SRM Gurus,
The problem we have with "Notes for Approval" at the bottom of SC is whenever some one adds a Note to this section it is not getting properly aligned for example see below for how finally all notes look like after Notes being added by Approvers
Notes for Approval
This is Notes Test3:
This is the Note from :AOGRAN On 27.02.2008:
FHANK On 02/26/2008:
CBRITT On 02/26/2008:
In the above CBRITT has added the first line "This is Notes Test3: " but the note is shown at the beginning and his ID and time stamp are at the bottom.
Is there any way, both can be combined together in one line side by side ??

Hi Swati,
Looks like the template was modified beforw I started working on it.I compared the template code in dvelopment with previous version and found some lines were missing , copied the missing lines and now it is working fine.
Thanks a lot for the help,
Anubhav

LaunchFCP error when submitting content for Approval

I'm getting a 'Delivery Validation' error while submitting content for approval.
Screenshot of error.
Where can I find the logs to debug issue's like this failures.

LaunchFCP refers to sending a proof. When you Submit Content for Approval, Adobe Campaign sends out a Proof to the proof target and sends a Validation Request to the Content Reviewer.
You can Open a delivery to view the error details on the Summary page. The proof does not appear on the Campaign dashboard, but you can go to the Deliveries folder under Campaign Management (default location) to see deliveries and their proofs. Proofs are a copy of the original delivery with [Proof n] in the subject line.
Generally, don't delete campaign configurations. For some configurations, when you delete them they are moved to an archive folder. For example, if I look in the Deleted deliveries folder, I can see some proofs and e-mails that you deleted. The reason your proof failed appears to be because of a missing subject line. There is a rule in Adobe Campaign that checks for this.
Hope this helps!

Faulty line for over a month now but BT says it is...

Has anyone got any suggestions, please? I reported a faulty line on 22nd April - it had an increasing amount noise on it (which it has had for ages but had become unbearable) including clicking, and my broadband kept dropping. I had done all the usual checks, disconnecting my home equipment and reconnecting it individually, and so on, and had checked my router which was fine. My ISP insisted that it was due to a faulty line and said that I should report it to BT. We have already had a fault repaired on the external line this year and one or two last year.
BT sent out an engineer on 24 April who traced the fault to 143m out from the junction box on our house. He went to junction box two halfway down our drive and found an absolute mess of old cabling which had been patched and cut into and bundled up and patched again, in the 50 pair cable feeding our telephone service 35 pairs were unuseable and the cable very old and damaged.
He put in a report saying that the manhole in the street needed investigating and also drew up a plan to have the cable from the street supplying our property to be replaced as it is really unviable it is in such a mess, including the JB2 cabling which has various unused and dead cables involved as well as those supplying our house). He contacted me to let me know that his manager had approved the cable replacement.
On April 30 two engineers attended and found the cable lying in water at the bottom of the manhole with our wires all corroded. They cut the wire back and recrimped it and then tied the cable up out of the water with a bit of blue nylon rope that was already down the manhole. They also looked at JB2 and agreed that the cabling needed to be sorted out. The engineers told me that someone would be out to sort out JB2 and left. After their recrimping our wires in the manhole our voice service has improved - there is still some hissing but no clicking - but the line is still unable to carry data consistently and our broadband continues to drop.
However on my BT online account later that day the fault was shown as having been fixed. I confirmed that the line was still faulty, however the case was closed anyway by 5th May even though no further work was done. I rang customer services (again - another hour or two on the phone!) and they were very apologetic and said they would reopen the case. However they did not - instead they opened a new case on 6th May, even though it is the same fault as reported on 22nd April.
Later on 6th May my account showed that the line had been fixed and the case closed, which I saw on the 7th and reopened it. On the 8th it showed that BT was going to investigate the fault and an hour later they shut the case again, saying it had been fixed. On the 9th I reopened it again. I rang customer services again, and they said that as the case had been closed I would have to start all over and have an engineer come out to check my equipment and line at my property. We were going away on holiday for a week so I booked the appointment for the first working day after our return - 20th May.
On the morning of 20th May I checked our online account and it showed that the case had been closed again. I rang customer services and sure enough the engineer's appointment had been cancelled. So I made a new appointment for 23rd May. The engineer has been today and tested the line from the junction box on the outside of our house (which is a good distance from our master socket) and said that while the line could carry voice it was not good enough to carry data properly. He looked into JB2 and the manhole in the street (which of course he is not allowed to go into to do anything so he can only look) and said that the cable was old and damaged and need to be replaced!
I watched him type up his report and upload it to BT Openreach, stating that the fault was not repaired and that the cable needed to be replaced. A couple of hours later I looked on my online account and found, with no real surprise, that the fault was showing as having been repaired and if I agreed they would shut the case down!
The engineer and I have worked out an inexpensive way of replacing the cable which requires a minimum amount of excavation along the tarmac'd drive (which we only have a right of way over anyhow), instead of which the cable could be continued along the wall down to the pavement and then taken down and into the nearest manhole which is two feet from the wall.
He has sent the A55 form in to his manager stating that the cable should be replaced in this way, (just as the last engineer did), so how can this fault be showing as fixed?
In the meantime my broadband provider Demon can see that the broadband keeps dropping, but they apparently can't do much about it. They buy ADSL provision from Cable & Wireless, who rent the line from BT, but Cable & Wireless can raise a fault with BT if the case is closed. But the BT Openreach engineers are all in agreement and reporting the line as faulty, yet BT is pretending that it has been fixed. Meanwhile my BT bill has arrived as usual and I am being asked to pay both BT and my internet provider as normal for a faulty service.
A month in and I am really at my wits end as to how to get BT to make the necessary repair. BT has claimed the fault has been fixed and closed the case several times since I first reported it on 22nd April, and shows no intention of doing what the engineers are all recommending which is to replace the old, faulty cable. In the meantime I am being hotly pursued by BT to buy BT Infinity Broadband, yet the line isn't fit to carry it, since the copper which runs from the cab in the street is unfit for purpose. Please let me know if you have any suggestions - we have been suffering with this old faulty line for some years now and it is just getting worse and worse.

Thanks for your reply John, but while the immediate problem is with the broadband the actual voice fault when it was reported was old damaged cable. All we have been given is a temporary fix, which is what yesterday's engineer put in his report. He showed it to me before he submitted it so I know that is true.
Both engineers who have attended in the last month have come to the same conclusion - that the cable is in a shocking state and needs to be replaced. We may not have a voice problem currently but we have had two repairs for voice this year alone and several over the past few years as our line keeps breaking down. The engineers are working their way through the cable as it corrodes and degrades trying to find clean pairs of copper wire to use. In the meantime we have ongoing problems with our broadband dropping - all because BT won't just get on and replace the cable.
It may be expensive for BT to replace the cable - although the engineer and I have worked out a cheaper way to do it by continuing the wire along with wall down to the street rather than trying to dig up the whole run of cable under our neighbour's newly laid tarmac on the shared drive - but actually since we have to go through this performance of BT engineers followed by Openreach engineers attending our property every few months it seems a false economy to me!
The broadband is just 'hitching a ride' with the copper line, and two engineers have agreed that the copper line is shot to bits. Once again the A55 has been cleared by the local team and passed to planning, because Openreach thinks that the cable needs to be replaced. But the BT computer system keeps shutting it down. I don't think on this occasion that it is reasonable for BT to refuse to deal with me as end user and just hand the problem on to my ISP - there is nothing they can do until the cable is replaced except reiterate what I have already told you. If we are forced to go there, that will simply necessitate another bunch of engineers coming out and looking at the problem all over again - extra expense to BT - why not just get on an fix the problem that we all know is there?
We have considered changing to BT Infinity as our area has fibre, but until the copper between us and the fibre has been replaced there is simply no point in giving even more money to BT for a service that will not be able to run at a good speed. If BT mans up and treats us decently by agreeing to replace the cable we will certainly be looking at Infinity again.

No control line for line item - error while posting bd to accounting

Hi all,
Billing document showing err "no control line for line item" while posting to accounting doc.Sales document is complete no in completion logs.
Previous errr: g/l missing for line item" in order incompletion after maintaining company code for customer, then refresh the g/l missing for line item is no more logs and showing the error "no control line for line item" while posting bd to accts.
Please help
Regards
anush

Hello Anush,
if the company data of the payer was not created when the sales order has been created, then the system could not create the correct records in table VBREVK. Once the company data has been maintained the VBREVK records could be corrected by re-saving the sales, but only if no billing document exists.
In your case you already created the billing document.
Please try these step:
1. reverse billing document
2. run VA02 add a blank char to PO number, save
3. create new billing document
Best regards,
Ivano.

Calling the Adobe form in a workflow step for Approval

Hi All,
We are creating a PCR scenario using Adobe forms for "Employee seperation". This form will require 7 subsequent approvals from various agents which is to be handled using a workflow.
I had gone through the ISR cookbook and managed to create a scenario. I have also assigned it to a PDF form and a dummy workflow. Now from my PCR iview i am able to submit the form for my scenario which also triggers the dummy workflow(through the BUS7051-CREATED event).
Right now this dummy workflow just sends a mail(by sendmail step) to the first approver. Now i want this workflow to send a workitem to the first approver for approval of this form which will have to appear in his UWL. When the approver double clicks on the workitem in UWL he should be able to view the form along with Approve/Reject/Cancel buttons. I am not aware how to do this. My questions are,
<b>Is this handled by a decision step or an activity?
If it is an activity step which Task/Business object method is used to handle this?
If it is a decision step how do we make the Adobe form also to be displayed along with approve/Reject buttons?</b>
We are using ECC5.0 and EP6.0.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Prasath N

Hi Rajasekhar,
The UWL issue has been resolved now and i am receiving the workitems in my UWL. But i am getting the following error when i am trying to execute the workitem from my UWL.
<b>Service cannot be reached
What has happened?
URL http://xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx:8000/webdynpro/dispatcher/sap.com/pcui_gp~isr/IsrFormApprove call was terminated because the corresponding service is not available.
Note
The termination occurred in system xxx with error code 404 and for the reason Not found.
The selected virtual host was 0 .
What can I do?
Please select a valid URL.
If you do not yet have a user ID, contact your system administrator.
ErrorCode:ICF-NF-http-c:000-u:SAPSYS-l:E-i:DALSPHSB_HSB_37-v:0-s:404-r:Notfound
HTTP 404 - Not found
Your SAP Internet Communication Framework Team
</b>
I have done the following configuration settings in SWFVISU transaction :
Task : TS500000075
Visualization Type : WebDynpro Java
visualization parameter: Application
visualization Value: IsrFormApprove
visualization parameter: Package
visualization Value: sap.com/pcui_gp~isr
Is there anything else that i have missed out in the configuration?
Message was edited by:
prasath natesan
Message was edited by:
prasath natesan

WS - "java.rmi.MarshalException: (1)Missing end tag for Body or Envelope"

HI All,
I'm new of this forum but I really hope you could help me solving the problem I have to connect Web Services and midlets.
Somehow my configuration works with some services I've found online but when I invoke very simple services deployed on my server(s) I always have "java.rmi.MarshalException: (1)Missing end tag for Body or Envelope" exception"
Let me add some more information to the problem:
System Configuration:
- JBoss (but I also tried axis) - standard installation (http/1.1)
- WTK 2.5 (but I also tried 2.2) - standard installation
- I tried "trusted" and "untrusted" security configuration of the servlet
- Netbeans IDE 5.0 (to create both Midlets and WS)
- WS uses document/literal as expected by JSR 172
The midlet is created with no problems but at the time of invocation the server throws the above exception (which is part of rmi. remoteException)
By monitoring the network both at client and server side I noticed that the information received is chuncked after 768 bytes. However, If the (soap) reponse is less than such value, I still have the error.
Using Http/1.1. at the mobile side, the service does not return me anything (0kb) while if I set the mobile device to http/1.0, I get the above error.
I really have to make the midlet running so any type of help will be really appreciated!!
Thanks in advance

Hi all,
as many developers I have encountered the famous "java.rmi.MarshallException:(1)Missing end tag for Body or Envelope" during the development of my WS app for J2ME (JSR 172).
It is correct that is the empty tag <soapenv:Header /> causing this error.
To fix this error, it is necessary to stop the server to generate this empty header in the response stream.
I have fixed this error for Axis2: unfortunaly it is necessary to modify a class in Axiom library. This library is used in Axis2 to produce the SOAP response, you can download the source code at http://ws.apache.org/commons/axiom/source-repository.html.
Here the class to modify:
axiom\modules\axiom-impl\src\main\java\org\apache\axiom\soap\impl\llom\soap11\SOAP11Factory.java
by commenting the line 273 in the method called getDefaultEnvelope() to prevent the empty header insertion in SOAP response:
public SOAPEnvelope getDefaultEnvelope() throws SOAPProcessingException {
        OMNamespace ns =
                new OMNamespaceImpl(
                        SOAP11Constants.SOAP_ENVELOPE_NAMESPACE_URI,
                        SOAP11Constants.SOAP_DEFAULT_NAMESPACE_PREFIX);
        SOAPEnvelopeImpl env = new SOAPEnvelopeImpl(ns, this);
        //createSOAPHeader(env); the line to be commented
        createSOAPBody(env);
        return env;
    }Finally you have to recompile Axiom using Maven to obtain the fixed package axiom-impl.jar and to replace this package on the lib repository of your Axis2 server.
A little tricky to fix this bug but now my app runs perfectly ;)
Enjoy!
Romain Pellerin
http://www.gasp-mobilegaming.org

MarshalException: Missing end tag for body or Envelop

Hi, I am new at this, pls advise.
I have been trying to code a 'hello world' that returns a string, as below.
//==================
package simple;
public class HelloWorld{
public String sayHello() {
return "hello";
//===================
and my buil.xml looks like this
//===================
<project name="simple" default ="all">
<property file="../properties.txt"/>
<property name="temp_dir" value="tmp_build" />
<target name="all" depends="clean,ear,deploy" />
<target name="clean" >
<delete dir="${classDir}/tutorial/simple" />
<delete file="${appDir}/simple.ear" />
<delete dir="${temp_dir}" />
<delete file="client.jar" />
</target>
<target name="build" depends="ear" />
<target name="ear" >
<delete dir="${temp_dir}" />
<mkdir dir="${temp_dir}" />
<mkdir dir="${temp_dir}/WEB-INF" />
<mkdir dir="${temp_dir}/WEB-INF/classes" />
<javac srcdir="." includes="HelloWorld.java"
destdir="${temp_dir}" />
<servicegen
destEar="simple.ear"
warName="simple.war"
contextURI="simple">
<service
javaClassComponents="simple.HelloWorld"
targetNamespace="http://examples/simple"
serviceName="Echo"
serviceURI="/HelloWorld"
     generateTypes="True"
expandMethods="True"
style="document">
<client
packageName="tutorial.simple.client"
clientJarName="client.jar"
/>
</service>
<classpath>
<pathelement path="${temp_dir}"/>
<pathelement path="${java.class.path}"/>
</classpath>
</servicegen>
</target>
<target name="deploy">
<copy file="simple.ear" todir="${appDir}"/>
</target>
</project>
//======================
I manage to deploy and run the service on weblogic through the browser. Next, when I try to run it on Java Wirelesss Tookit. I get a "MarshalException: Missing end tag for Body or Evelop" error.
I basically used the stub generator from WTK and use them as below
//====================
try {
String str = service.sayHello();
System.out.println( str );
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
//=====================
I have no problem running other examples, just this one which i coded on my own. Can anyone pls enlightent me :)

Hi all,
as many developers I have encountered the famous "java.rmi.MarshallException:(1)Missing end tag for Body or Envelope" during the development of my WS app for J2ME (JSR 172).
It is correct that is the empty tag <soapenv:Header /> causing this error.
To fix this error, it is necessary to stop the server to generate this empty header in the response stream.
I have fixed this error for Axis2: unfortunaly it is necessary to modify a class in Axiom library. This library is used in Axis2 to produce the SOAP response, you can download the source code at http://ws.apache.org/commons/axiom/source-repository.html.
Here the class to modify:
axiom\modules\axiom-impl\src\main\java\org\apache\axiom\soap\impl\llom\soap11\SOAP11Factory.java
by commenting the line 273 in the method called getDefaultEnvelope() to prevent the empty header insertion in SOAP response:
public SOAPEnvelope getDefaultEnvelope() throws SOAPProcessingException {
        OMNamespace ns =
                new OMNamespaceImpl(
                        SOAP11Constants.SOAP_ENVELOPE_NAMESPACE_URI,
                        SOAP11Constants.SOAP_DEFAULT_NAMESPACE_PREFIX);
        SOAPEnvelopeImpl env = new SOAPEnvelopeImpl(ns, this);
        //createSOAPHeader(env); the line to be commented
        createSOAPBody(env);
        return env;
    }Finally you have to recompile Axiom using Maven to obtain the fixed package axiom-impl.jar and to replace this package on the lib repository of your Axis2 server.
A little tricky to fix this bug but now my app runs perfectly ;)
Enjoy!
Romain Pellerin
http://www.gasp-mobilegaming.org

Purchase Order / Requisition Line Item Approval

Hi
Just wondering if Purchase Order / Purchase Requisition LINE ITEM approval is an option for workflow?
Would the better solution be to use SRM line item approval on a shopping cart and create the Purchase Order from this?

Hi
Just wondering if Purchase Order / Purchase Requisition LINE ITEM approval is an option for workflow?
If the process involved the need to use different approvers for different line items, would the better solution be to use SRM line item approval on a shopping cart and create the Purchase Order from this?

Withholding tax information missing from line item

Hi Gurus,
We have created a vendor invoice in SAP. The voucher processed and paid has withholding tax of 1,333.00
But if you display the vendor invoice and click on the withholding tax data button, it says that withholding tax information missing from line item.
Kindly advise how could this happen when the vendor account has maintains withholding tax code and the payment document also has withholding tax information.
Thanks,
Ellicec

Dear,
Please check the following:
1. The withholding tax types and indicators must be defined as Liable'.
Please check this via vender master data (fk02).
2.Please check field status group for withholding tax fields in
transactions OB14 (inserting the field status variant of the Company Code oby6 and the field status group of the g/l account that You can find running FS00) and OB41 (posting key, in DP case 29). Check the account group for the GL account
assigned to the vendor reconciliation account in FBKP.
These should be set as "optional".
Select group --> Taxes
Suppress Req. Entry Optional Entry
Withholding Tax Code X
Withholding Tax Amounts X
regards

Thank you for approving my feed iTunes . The only problem is, there is no art work, even though artwork was submitted correct sizes and formats were used. Why is this and how can the problem be rectified?

Thank you for approving my feed iTunes . The only problem is, there is no art work, even though artwork was submitted correct sizes and formats were used. Why is this and how can the problem be rectified?

Thanks for getting back. Hadn't got round to re uploading the amended feed. I just did it now.
The only thing is, Feed Validator doesn't like it because of the picture size, and a couple of other things, it reeds the following:
Sorry
This feed does not validate.
line 22, column 14: width must be between 1 and 144: 1400 [help] <width>1400</width>
              ^
line 23, column 15: height must be between 1 and 400: 1400 [help] <height>1400</height>
               ^
line 25, column 21: XML parsing error: <unknown>:25:21: not well-formed (invalid token) [help]
<itunes:image href=http://www.whiteberg.com/Wdotfontitunes2.png" />
                     ^
In addition, interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations.
Your feed appears to be encoded as "utf-8", but your server is reporting "US-ASCII" [help]
line 4, column 114: Self reference doesn't match document location [help]... dcast.xml" type="application/rss+xml" />
                                             ^

Missing Adminitrative Line for approval

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for