Outlook ldap search problem

Hi Sun,
I able to search contact list using Mozilla thunder bird. with search base dn
ou=people,dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xxx
but this doesn`t work in OUTLOOK 2007.
May i know is it required outlook connect ?
Sun Java System Connector for Microsoft Outlook ?
Cheer
Sam

Hello,
Although the lists and memberships are listed in the GAL (generated by the calendar server through LDAP calls to OID), there still aren't any 'hooks' into the email server to allow for DL management. We have plans to expose DL management in the future, but not in the short or middle term. For the time being, you'll have to go through webmail to manage DLs.
Hope that helps,
--Marc

Similar Messages

Outlook 2013 Search Problem.

Hello friends,
My outlook 2013 search box gives no result. I cant find anything after I move pst file from D:\ to D:\outlook\ folder.
Actually there are many topics about this issue in technet and I check the related topics, so I found a little solution.
If I put a check to "allow this file have contents in addition the file" in pst file properties I going to rebuild index and restart outlook seach box working clearly. But one day later, I see the pst file properties unchecked So search
box doesnt work again.
I create new profile but nothing changed.
Do you have any idea ? This is important so I cant find old emails. :( Thank you all.

Brilliant! I have been looking for this solution for the last month! Apart from re-indexing/ repairing .pst files/ Re-installing .pst files / changing registry directories and setting defaults. Something as simple as de-selecting the "Microsoft Outlook"
worked finally. Thanks Emreoz! I can search my emails again

Outlook 2011 Search Problem

After recently upgrading to OSX 10.9.3 my outlook 2011 search funcion only seraches the last 2 weeks of emails. Does anyone have a solution to this problem

After recently upgrading to OSX 10.9.3 my outlook 2011 search funcion only seraches the last 2 weeks of emails. Does anyone have a solution to this problem

URGENT : EP LDAP Search Problem

Guys....any inputs ?????
Dear Portal Gurus,
We have connected LDAP To EP 6.0 SP12.
LDAP is ADS 2003 with two forests.(Deep Hierarchy)
I have created a XML config file for LDAP (UME Config. file) which connects to both the forests.
Everything works fine except when I navigate to Groups (say GROUPABC) and then from inside the group search for a USER (say USER001)who shows up as being in that group from a LDAP Browser (like Softerra) the search does NOT result in any match.
The group displays only 200 users even though there are more than 5000 users in it.The message we get is " the search hit is limited to 200 hits."
This user (USER001) does NOT show up in those 200 users.Now if I search for another user (say USER002) who is not in those 200 users but can be still seen from LDAP Browser (exactly like the last user I.E. USER001),that user (002) is being found as a result of a search from inside that group (GROUPABC).
There is a parameter in UME Properties file where we can change the max. search hits value from 200 to anything.
Will changing this value make EP to find USER001 in groupABC.
Pls note when USER001 and USER002 are searched as USERs (search users link) in EP they are seen to be assigned to the group GROUPABC.
Am told that windows has a limitation of showing only 1500 users inside a group.
To summarise : <b>my questions are :
1) How to find USER001 from inside GROUPABC &
2) How to display more than 1500 users inside that
GROUP in EP.</b>
Greatly appreciate your inputs.
Thanks.
Josh
Message was edited by: Josh Mannings
Message was edited by: Josh Mannings

Hi,
What you can do is
Go to -->config tool.bat
-->click on pencil icon
-->cluster_data
-->server
-->cfg
-->services
-->property sheet of com.sap.security.core.ume.service
-->find the property ume.superadmin.activate = TRUE
Now logon to your portal with admin credentials and once you logged in again come here and make this property = FALSE
This is known as SAP* user
NOTE: Please keep atleast one user with super admin role assigned when such thing happens again so that you can unlock it from portal itself and your work wont get stopped.
Regards,
Ameya

Open Directory, third party LDAP search path problem on Snow Leopard

Happy new year folks,
I ran into an interesting problem this past week in regards to a third party LDAP directory in the Search path (which used to work on previous versions). The issue brings the server to its knees eventually. I'm still digging through the logs, but here's the general breakdown...
1. Add third-party LDAP to the OD node list. This has always worked on previous versions, and appears to still work at the most basic level. I can navigate the node with DSCL, read records, etc.
1. Add third-party LDAP to the OD search path.
2. Wait a few minutes....
3. The server begins to slow down. Apache, SSH, ServerAdmin service stop responding. I'm able to run "top" briefly, which shows an increase of threads.
4. Restart the server and quickly remove the directory from the OD search path
5. Server goes back to being rock solid with very nice response times for Apache, SSH, ServerAdmin, etc.
If anyone has any debugging suggestions, or has seen this before, let me know.
Jaime
--- Below is some console output leading up to the chaos. Before adding to search path, everything looks good --------------------
bash-3.2# dscl
Entering interactive mode... (type "help" for commands)
read /LDAPv3/ldap.itd.umich.edu/Users/jaimelm cn
dsAttrTypeNative:cn:
Jaime Magiera
Jaime L Magiera 1
Jaime L Magiera
--- Add to Search Path, which hangs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bash-3.2# dscl /Search -append / CSPSearchPath /LDAPv3/ldap.itd.umich.edu
--- DSCL in debug mode contains the following ----------------------------------------------
2010-01-01 19:26:25 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: ipfw, PID: 1097, API: libinfo, Server Used : libinfomig DAR : Procedure = getprotobynumber (13) : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:25 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: sso_util, PID: 1103, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAR : 1 : Dir Ref = 16779669 : Requested nodename = /Search
2010-01-01 19:26:25 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Plug-in call "dsDoPlugInCustomCall()" failed with error = -14292.
2010-01-01 19:26:25 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Port: 27151 Call: dsDoPlugInCustomCall() == -14292
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAR : 1 : Dir Ref = 16779
707 : Requested nodename = /LDAPv3/ldap.itd.umich.edu
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAR : 2 : Dir Ref = 16779707 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsVerifyDirRefNum(), Server Used : DAC : Dir Ref 167797072010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsVerifyDirRefNum(), Server Used : DAR : Dir Ref 16779707
: Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAC : Dir Ref 16779707 :
Data buffer size = 1282010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAR : 1 : Dir Ref = 16779
707 : Requested nodename = ConfigNode2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAR : 2 : Dir Ref = 16779
707 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: Requesting dsOpenDirNode with PID = 1114, UID = 0, and EUID = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsOpenDirNode(), Configure Used : DAC : Dir Ref = 16779707 : Node Name = /Configure
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsOpenDirNode(), Configure Used : DAR : Dir Ref = 1677970
7 : Node Ref = 33556926 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsVerifyDirRefNum(), Server Used : DAC : Dir Ref 16779707
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsVerifyDirRefNum(), Server Used : DAR : Dir Ref 16779707 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsGetDirNodeInfo(), Configure Used : DAC : Node Ref = 33556926 : Requested Attrs = dsAttrTypeStandard:OperatingSystemVersion : Attr Type Only Flag = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsGetDirNodeInfo(), Configure Used : DAR : Node Ref = 33556926 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsGetDirNodeInfo(), Search Used : DAC : Node Ref = 33556924 : Requested Attrs = dsAttrTypeStandard:LSPSearchPath : Attr Type Only Flag = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsGetDirNodeInfo(), Search Used : DAR : Node Ref = 33556924 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsDoPlugInCustomCall(), Search Used : DAC : Node Ref = 33556924 : Request Code = 444
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Checking for Search Node XML config file:
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - /Library/Preferences/DirectoryService/SearchNodeConfig.plist
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Have written the Search Node XML config file:
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - /Library/Preferences/DirectoryService/SearchNodeConfigBackup.plist
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Setting search policy to Custom search
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - CSearchPlugin::SwitchSearchPolicy: switch - reachability of node </LDAPv3/127.0.0.1> retained as <true>
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - CSearchPlugin::CheckNodes: checking network node reachability on search policy 0x0000000000002201
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - CCachePlugin::EmptyCacheEntryType - Request to empty all types - Flushing the cache
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Client: Requesting dsOpenDirNode with PID = 0, UID = 0, and EUID = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsOpenDirNode(), LDAPv3 Used : DAC : Dir Ref = 16777216 : Node Name = /LDAPv3/127.0.0.1
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsOpenDirNode(), LDAPv3 Used : DAR : Dir Ref = 16777216 : Node Ref = 33556929 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - CSearchPlugin::CheckNodes: calling dsOpenDirNode succeeded on node </LDAPv3/127.0.0.1>
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsCloseDirNode(), LDAPv3 Used : DAC : Node Ref = 33556929
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsCloseDirNode(), LDAPv3 Used : DAR : Node Ref = 33556929 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x0000000103181000] - mbr_mig - dsFlushMembershipCache - force cache flush (internally initiated)
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Client: Requesting dsOpenDirNode with PID = 0, UID = 0, and EUID = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x0000000103181000] - Membership - dsNodeStateChangeOccurred - flagging all entries as expired
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsOpenDirNode(), LDAPv3 Used : DAC : Dir Ref = 16777216 : Node Name = /LDAPv3/ldap.itd.umich.edu
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - CLDAPNodeConfig::InternalEstablishConnection - Node ldap.itd.umich.edu - Connection requested for read
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - CLDAPNodeConfig::FindSuitableReplica - Node ldap.itd.umich.edu - Attempting Replica connect to 141.211.93.133 for read
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x0000000102481000] - CCachePlugin::SearchPolicyChange - search policy change notification, looking for NIS
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x0000000102481000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsGetDirNodeInfo(), Search Used : DAC : Node Ref = 33554436 : Requested Attrs = dsAttrTypeStandard:SearchPath : Attr Type Only Flag = 0
------- From another screen, I do "id jaimelm", which hangs ------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Requested Rec Names = jaimelm : Rec Name Pattern Match:8449 = eDSiExact : Requested Rec Types = dsRecTypeStandard:Users
2010-01-01 19:36:55 EST - T[0x00000001082A2000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsGetRecordList(), Search Used : DAC : 2 : Node Ref = 33554436 : Requested Attrs = dsAttrTypeStandard:AppleMetaNodeLocation;dsAttrTypeStandard:RecordName;dsAttrTy peStandard:Password;dsAttrTypeStandard:UniqueID;dsAttrTypeStandard:GeneratedUID; dsAttrTypeStandard:PrimaryGroupID;dsAttrTypeStandard:NFSHomeDirectory;dsAttrType Standard:UserShell;dsAttrTypeStandard:RealName;dsAttrTypeStandard:Keywords : Attr Type Only Flag = 0 : Record Count Limit = 1 : Continue Data = 0
2010-01-01 19:37:03 EST - T[0x0000000108325000] - Client: httpd, PID: 157, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000102022B30
2010-01-01 19:37:03 EST - T[0x00000001083A8000] - Client: httpd, PID: 151, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000102022C50
2010-01-01 19:37:05 EST - T[0x000000010842B000] - Client: httpd, PID: 203, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000102022D70
2010-01-01 19:37:15 EST - T[0x00000001084AE000] - Client: httpd, PID: 994, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000102023890
2010-01-01 19:37:26 EST - T[0x0000000108531000] - Client: httpd, PID: 198, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000102023980
2010-01-01 19:37:31 EST - T[0x00000001085B4000] - Client: httpd, PID: 161, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000~

Hi
I'm in agreement with harry here but what I'm struggling to understand is why you are seeing this as a problem? I'm also struggling to see this as being a possibility in a single server environment if I understand your post correctly?
Promotion to OD Master with all that entails absolutely rests on a properly configured and tested internal DNS Service. The Kerberos Realm's foundation (and with that the ability of the server to perform its function as KDC and offer LDAP services) entirely depends on what is configured in the DNS Service. This will include the server name, domain name and tld. The Kerberos Realm automatically configures itself using that information. Likewise the searchbase.
Its more than possible to change the Realm name and with it the LDAP search base (in certain circumstances) and have an OD Master, however Kerberos won't start it won't need to as the KDC will be elsewhere. You generally see this when augmenting Windows AD with MCX. In that situation Realm name and search base will reflect what is set on the Active Directory. Client computers will use what is set there for contact and authentication information before looking at the OD Master for anything else.
Does this help? Tony

Outlook 2010, Exchange 2010 - Searching Problems

Anyone out there able to help with some searching problems some of our users have been seeing?
Searching in OWA works fine but some people have problems when searching for older emails in Outlook. We've rebuilt Outlook profiles, rebuilt the windows index's (which seems to work but only temporarily). If there's a way to schedule the Windows index to
rebuild every night or once week, I'd be very happy to test that out but haven't been able to figure out how to do that.
Anyone have any other ideas?

Hi,
It seems something keeps corrupting the index... Run Anti-virus program and Malicious Software Removal Tool to scan your system, check if there's any virus or malware that may cause the index issue.
If this issue persists, please also go to File tab ->
Options -> Search -> Indexing Options
-> Advanced -> Click Troubleshoot search and indexing, to do some troubleshooting steps to find the possible cause.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Melon Chen
TechNet Community Support

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

Outlook 2010 search for contacts of connected account

Hello.
My client has one issue: they can search contacts in their exchange account but the results don't return contacts from an account that she is authorized to (she can see emails from this other account). She doesn't remember what triggered it she just said
it stopped working. The other person has Mac. How do you enable or troubleshoot search shared contacts from connected accounts?
She is using Windows 8 and Outlook 2010 and they have internal exchange server 2007. I have seen this post: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/0403a096-49b1-4a87-a34f-44566c9cf9ab/outlook-2010-searching-a-shared-users-contacts?forum=outlook
where it points me to another site but it doesn't say what the problem could be if you can't search from shared contacts.

Hi,
Is the user searching within the shared Contacts folder?
Switch to Outlook Online Mode and search, does the issue persist?
Regards,
Melon Chen
TechNet Community Support
It's recommended to download and install Configuration
Analyzer Tool (OffCAT), which is developed by Microsoft Support teams. Once the tool is installed, you can run it at any time to scan for hundreds of known issues in Office programs.

Concurrent ldap search in the same thread

Hi,
I try to send in parallel several ldap search request to an iDS5.0 SP1 ldap server. The ldap client is java coded using LDAP SDK.
To emphasis my problem, I wrote a very simple ldap client:
A first request is sent to the ldap server. 200 entries matches the search criteria;
searchListener = _ld.search("ou=city0, ou=region0, ou=LoadTest, o=surpass.com",1,"(cn=*)",attrs,false,null, searchConstraints);
I read the 5 first messages sent back by the ldap server:
while (true) {
ldapMessage=searchListener.getResponse();
nbEntries++;
if (nbEntries>5) break;
Without waiting for the resultCode message, I send a new ldap search:
ldapSearchResults = _ld.search("ou=city1, ou=region1, ou=LoadTest, o=surpass.com",1,"(cn=*)",attrs,false,searchConstraints);
This search locks the java process. A timeout message is generated in the ldap server logs:
[27/Jan/2003:14:13:35 +0100] conn=60660 op=2 fd=48 closed error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) - B4
Is it a bug? Or is it mandatory, in a single thread process, to wait for the resultCode message before sending any other search request?
Yannick

Thank's for answering
You'r right, there are many ways to overcome the problem in my very simple ldap client:
- Send an abandon
- Wait for the resultCode message
- Use the search constraint BATCHSIZE=0
But my question is: is it possible to run several concurrent ldap requets in the same thread (like a pool of ldap search) and check their results in a asynchronous way?
Any idea?

Cant Edit Ldap Search Base in Open Directory

Greetings ,
My ldap search base wrong in my open directory . I have tried converting the server to standalone and back to a directory master and it still retains the old search base. How do i get rid of this, as it is causing problems.
Thanks In Advance

Any resolution to this? I am trying to configure OD and it's NOT using our FQDN for the server as the search base... instead of server.domain.NET it is putting in server.domain.COM - pretty sure that will cause problems.
I ran host <ip address> and checked our DNS settings on the server and everything is configured as .NET - cannot find this .COM anywhere. Am NOT in a position to do an uninstall and re-install as many folks have seemed to have done.
Mike

Outlook 2013 Search on Server 2008 R2 - non-functional

The instant search on our Outlook 2013 is constantly turning up the "We couldn't find what you were looking for" message. It is installed on Server 2008 R2 with Citrix providing desktops to our users. The PST files are being stored with
the rest of the user profile on our domain controller (separate machine). For testing purposes I had tried moving my PST to the C: drive. Have tried rebuilding the index and still not working. One thing I did notice was that if I uninstalled windows search
from server manager and installed the indexing service, search functioned properly (this is not ideal), however, every time I would launch outlook I would get a message that it was installing 64-bit components. How can I get search functioning for our users?

I thought I'd post what worked for me with this problem. Your post is old, but I figure others may benefit from this solution.
I found an old Microsoft Support post about "Search" and Outlook being installed properly on a Terminal Server. I followed the procedure and it worked for me on Windows Server 2012 R2 and Outlook 2013. (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/222303)
The following assumes you've enabled the Windows Search feature via the Server Manager.
Install Office and then you must run Outlook as an administrator first. Once you've done that the search tool will properly run and index everything for others on the terminal server.
If you've already installed Office and users have already been using Outlook then you need to repair your Office installation to get Outlook's search working properly. To fix this simply login as the administrator, run the Office repair tool,
then run Outlook as the administrator before any of your users on that terminal server do.
That's it. Once you do that you'll find that the Outlook search begins to index everything properly. You may want to rebuild the indexes by using the rebuild commanded in the Control Panel under Indexing Options.
This worked for me perfectly on three Windows 2012 R2 terminal servers.

DHCP LDAP search base

Hi,
What setting should be put in the search base box in the LDAP tab of DHCP? I would like users to be able to access the OD database in tools such as the Address Book.
(I currently have the dc=<name>,dc=<suffix> where these are the name.suffix of my domain). In this configuration, the users can not see the LDAP database.
Thanks,
Dave

Hi Hiya,
Thank you for taking the time to look at my question. Here's my problem. We're setting up a VOIP phone system and one of the questionnaire is to provide LDAP Search Base String of my AD. I'm not sure if I need
to provide all this search base (DC, CN and OU) all I want to know is which of the element I should provide.
I think my LDAP search base string is "OU=xxx,DC=mydomain,DC=local. (I'm still not sure but if you have an idea please help).
Thank you.
Jay
aja

Change LDAP search path

When I built our CallManager 8.6 enviornment, I mirroed the way our 7.3 was set up. We had set up our LDAP search space at the root of our domain. The problem is that includes all kinds of sub directories we dont want. I want to now change our LDAP to look deeper in our hiarchy. What I dont know though is will it then see every person as a new user. If so, it would break UCCX and Presence.

Yep they do stay the same. And the way I know it worked is if I look up a user I wanted to keep it shows "Ldap Active". For the users I wanted gone they now show "delete pending".

Outlook 2011 Search - Reindex did not fix

I have an iMac running 10.6 with Outlook 2011 using an Exchange account.
Search has stopped working. I have re-indexed the drive several times. Today, I completely removed the identity, rebooted, re-setup the identity and Exchange account, allowed all mail to download, re-indexed the entire hard drive, rebooted, and search still does not work.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!

Search problems in Outlook are by no means uncommon. There are some suggestions here that might help:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1097977
If not, you may have better luck asking for help in Microsoft's own forum:
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mac/forum/macoutlook
Regards.

LDAP Search filter Jabber for Android

Hi,
I have this LDAP Filter which only shows me active users:
<BaseFilter>(&(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))</BaseFilter>
I have the same line for Jabber for Android, but it doesn't work.
<BDIBaseFilter>(&(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))</BDIBaseFilter>
I get 0 results for any search on Jabber Andorid. When I delete the "BDI" Line for the filter all together, then I get correct results - with photos and everything.
I also tried a simple filter e.g:
<BDIBaseFilter>(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))</BDIBaseFilter>
No search results either.
Any ideas how to get Filter for Android working?
Versions:
Jabber for Android: 10.6
CUCM: 9.1.2

I think I found the coresponding messages in the log:
csf.person.ldap: [LdapSearchQueryHandler.cpp(51)] [start] - reqId = 2
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1482)] [sendSearchQuery] -
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15477 I csf.person.xmpp: [XMPPPersonRecordSource.cpp(268)] [fetchContacts] - Entering.
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1531)] [sendSearchQuery] - filter = (&(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2)(|(sAMAccountName=at1sath))), baseDN=OU=Organization,DC=at,DC=customer,DC=net
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15477 D services-dispatcher: [ServicesDispatcher.cpp(147)] [pumpNext] - pumpNext.executed (ContactsAdapter::LoadContactsFromSource)
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1576)] [sendSearchQuery] - ldap search error. rc= -7 ,msg=Bad search filter
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1675)] [notifyListenersSearchRequestCompleted] - errorCode=-7
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15477 D services-dispatcher: [ServicesDispatcher.cpp(145)] [pumpNext] - pumpNext.executing (ContactsAdapter::LoadContactsFromSource)
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1258)] [mapErrorNo] - Code = -7, Msg=Bad search filter
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapSearchQueryHandler.cpp(84)] [onSearchRequestCompleted] - reqId = 1, errcode = 9
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1531)] [sendSearchQuery] - filter = (&(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2)(|(sAMAccountName=at1hafr))), baseDN=OU=Organization,DC=at,DC=customer,DC=net
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1576)] [sendSearchQuery] - ldap search error. rc= -7 ,msg=Bad search filter
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1675)] [notifyListenersSearchRequestCompleted] - errorCode=-7
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1258)] [mapErrorNo] - Code = -7, Msg=Bad search filter
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapSearchQueryHandler.cpp(84)] [onSearchRequestCompleted] - reqId = 2, errcode = 9
The next question is now: Why is it a bad search filter? And what is the correct one? The same filter works on jabber for windows...
BR, Dave

Outlook ldap search problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for