Reconciliation - Recon even results not reflected in child forms

Hi All,
I am new to OIM and prior to this i have worked Sun Identity Manager.
My problem is:
User(USER1) has two roles in SAP system. I have checked users resource profile (child form), it shows two records.
Recon First Cycle: I have deleted one role in target system and ran the reconciliation for USER1. A recon event is created and recon manager shows that user has one role and status is "Event Linked". I have checked the users resource profile (child form), it shows only one record.
Recon Second Cycle: Again i have deleted one more role in target system (SAP) and ran reconciliation. Now the reconciliation event is created and recon manager shows user has no role and status is "Event Linked". When i checking in users resource profile (child form), it still showing the last record.
Even though the user doesn't have any role in target system and reconciliation manager, I don't know why it showing last records in users resource profile (child form).
My system configuration:
OIM version : OIM 9.1.0.2
Oracle Database : 10g
Application Server : JBOSS 4.2.3
Web browser : Internet explorer 6.0
Operating System : Windows server 2003
-- Chellappan
Edited by: user9164768 on May 12, 2010 12:30 PM

Very strange result.
Seems like a bug in the connector. Have you tried opening an SR with Oracle?
Best regards
/Martin

Similar Messages

Custom Target Reconciliation with child form entries in OIM 11g

Hello experts,
I have developed custom scheduler code to reconcile users from target system to OIM. In this code I am using the API createReconciliationEvent(java.lang.String psObjectName, java.util.Map poData, boolean pbFinishEvent). If the reconciled user does not have any child form entries(like roles and groups) then the user account is linked to OIM user profile but if the user has child form entries then user is not getting reconciled to OIM. In the logs it says...
oracle.iam.platform.utils.SuperRuntimeException: -104: Error occurred in XL_SP_RECONEVALUATEUSER while processing Event No 849 Error occurred in XL_SP_RECONREQDATACHECK while processing Event 849 'Event Received' is an invalid event status. Valid event states are Data Received,Data Validation Failed,Being Re-evaluated,Being Re-tried
at oracle.iam.reconciliation.dao.ReconActionDao.executeUserMatch(ReconActionDao.java:393)
at oracle.iam.reconciliation.impl.UserHandler.process(UserHandler.java:64)
at oracle.iam.reconciliation.impl.ActionEngine.processEvent(ActionEngine.java:194)
at oracle.iam.reconciliation.impl.ReconOperationsServiceImpl.processReconciliationEvent(ReconOperationsServiceImpl.java:982)
at oracle.iam.reconciliation.api.ReconOperationsServiceEJB.processReconciliationEventx(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:310)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:182)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:149)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.jee.spi.MethodInvocationVisitorImpl.visit(MethodInvocationVisitorImpl.java:37)
at weblogic.ejb.container.injection.EnvironmentInterceptorCallbackImpl.callback(EnvironmentInterceptorCallbackImpl.java:54)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.jee.spi.EnvironmentInterceptor.invoke(EnvironmentInterceptor.java:50)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:89)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
at $Proxy334.processReconciliationEventx(Unknown Source)
at oracle.iam.reconciliation.api.ReconOperationsService_emc07d_ReconOperationsServiceRemoteImpl.__WL_invoke(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:40)
Here is my code...
public void reconCall(String ResourceObject, Hashtable mUserDetail)
ReconOperationsService tcreconObj =null;
EventAttributes eventattr= new EventAttributes();
ArrayList roles=roleOfUser(mUserDetail.get("CommanName").toString(),mUserDetail.get("OrganizationUnit").toString());
ArrayList groups=groupOfUser(mUserDetail.get("CommanName").toString(),mUserDetail.get("OrganizationUnit").toString());
if((roles.size()==0)&& (groups.size()==0))
eventattr.setEventFinished(true);
else
eventattr.setEventFinished(false);
try
LOGGER.info("In com.gapp.recon.tasks.ReconAllUsers reconCall()");
LOGGER.info("Creating object of Thor.API.Operations.tcReconciliationOperationsIntf");
tcreconObj = Platform.getService(oracle.iam.reconciliation.api.ReconOperationsService.class);
LOGGER.info("Creating reconcilation event");
long lnreckey = tcreconObj.createReconciliationEvent(ResourceObject, mUserDetail, eventattr);
if(roles.size()==0)
LOGGER.info("there are no roles for the user");
if(roles.size()>0)
tcreconObj.providingAllMultiAttributeData(lnreckey, "RoleName", true);
LOGGER.info("Iterating roles");
LOGGER.info(roles.toString());
for(int k=0; k <roles.size(); k++)
LOGGER.info("Iteration "+k);
HashMap multiroles=new HashMap();
LOGGER.info("Adding role to hashmap");
multiroles.put("RoleName", roles.get(k));
LOGGER.info(multiroles.toString());
long j= tcreconObj.addMultiAttributeData(lnreckey, "RoleName", multiroles);
LOGGER.info("addMultiAttributeData key "+j);
if(groups.size()==0)
LOGGER.info("There Are No Groups For This User");
if(groups.size()>0)
tcreconObj.providingAllMultiAttributeData(lnreckey, "GroupName", true);
LOGGER.info("Iterating groups");
LOGGER.info(groups.toString());
for(int k=0; k <groups.size(); k++)
LOGGER.info("Iteration "+k);
HashMap multigroups=new HashMap();
LOGGER.info("Adding group to hashmap");
multigroups.put("GroupName", groups.get(k));
LOGGER.info(multigroups.toString());
long j= tcreconObj.addMultiAttributeData(lnreckey, "GroupName", multigroups);
LOGGER.info("addMultiAttributeData key "+j);
// LOGGER.info("executing processReconciliationEvent");
tcreconObj.processReconciliationEvent(lnreckey);
//LOGGER.info("executing finishReconciliationEvent");
// tcreconObj.finishReconciliationEvent(lnreckey);
// LOGGER.info("executing updateScheduletaskattribute");
}Pls Help.
Thanks

You gotta specify your child table recon-field in the process definition mappings as a Key Field. Refer OOTB AD connector and check:
Process Definition -> AD User ->Reconciliation Field Mappings -> memberOf

Child forms are not getting displayed when user is linked through the targe

I have provisioned the users to OID through OIM and we have the three child forms(USRB_ROLB,USRB_GRPD,USRB_NBNB) which work well when the user flow normally. Our normal flow implemented is that user comes from OHCM and get created in OIM and then get provisioned to AD and OID. We have also implemented the OID target recon. When we create the user directly in OID and then create the user through normal flow ie from OHCM to OIM) as expected the create user task fail as the user is already present in the OID (target system). Then after running the OID target recon the user is getting linked but its not showing the child forms in the new process form created after running the target recon.
Please let me know if you require more information.
Please let me know if anybody has encountered this issue and the steps to resolve the same

what happened when you run target recon without creating user in oim(or just create user in oim without access policy and then run target recon)? Is this work fine?
If no means you have to verify your child table mapping. But if above work then this the Produce/connector issue and may you need to raise SR

Amended Columns in IR not showing in Edit Form

Hi,
I Created a IR report using A form on a report wizard. I have now changed the underlying query in the IR and it is showing correct. When I click on Edit, the records are not forwarded to the form. Even the new fields in the IR are not reflected in the form. Where do I update the Underlying query for the Form?
Regards
David

Thanks, I have seen the problem

After installing iOS6, my Maps are not working at all, anything i search it says "result not found" even after placing a pin and selecting "Direction to here" i get the same result not found. Very disappointed with the new iOS

After installing iOS6, my Maps are not working at all, anything i search it says "result not found" even after placing a pin and selecting "Direction to here" i get the same result not found. Very disappointed with the new iOS.

Have you run it in a debugger? That will show you exactly what is happening and why.

Child part demand for Subcontractor parts not reflecting in SNP

Hi
I have a situation where the demand for child parts are not reflecting in SNP.
The demand for the parent parts are visible in SNP, but the demand in turn is not being reflected against child parts that are Subcontractor parts.
The demand for child parts are visible in R/3 and in Product View (/SAPAPO/RRP3 - Product View) in APO, but not in the planning book.
Please can you assist me.
Thanx in advance.
Keegan

Hi Gaurav
Let me give you further detail to explain the problem.
Child part - A
Parent part - B
Finished Product - C
Step 1 - We purchase part "A".
Step 2 - We supply part "A" to subcontractor supplier,
who after processing part "A" supplies back to us part "B".
Step 3 - We issue part "B" to finished product "C" ,as part "B" is a BOM component for part "C"
The problem we face is that when Demand for part "C" comes through, it in turn places Dependant Demand on BOM compnent part "B".
The APO SNP system then raises Purchase Reqs for part "B" which is placed on our Subcontractor supplier.
However the demand for part "B" is not distributed to part "A" which we need to raise Purchase Reqs for as it is needed to be supplied to Subcontractor to process for us and then in turn supply back to us part "B".
Please advise as to how we can distribute the demand for part "B" to part "A" as there is a 1 to 1 ratio, so for every 1 part "A" we purchase and supply to Subcontractor, we raise a Purchase Req against the Subcontractor to receive back 1 part "B" which we issue to Production order for finished part "C".
Also please let me know what the settings in the R/3 material masters should be for part "A"and "B" on tabs MRP 1, 2, 3 and 4
Please let me know if there is any other info you require from me, to assist me.
Thanx in advance
Keegan

Net Price does not reflect on Consignment PO even after maintaining info re

Dear Experts,
I have created consignment PO but the net price does not reflect on it. I have already maintained valid consignment info record for this material with reference to standard purchasing organization in ME11.
Would appreciate your views ...
Cheers !
Sachin Narvekar

Hi,
the system behaviour is correct here.
The basic concept of vendor consignment lies in this.
In this case PO is a request to put his stocks at the company.
The moment we uses( Transfer from vendor stock to Company's own stock, using 411, or direct issue to cost centres using 201K) this stock, liability will be generated.
Then the price from the info record will be used as well as the tax code.
Then u can run a settlement transation , for payment settlements.
Until the moment u uses the stock, it will be vendors stock only, thats why only Issue create liability.
So the system behaviour is correct.
Regards
Krishna

Modified WAD report does not reflect in Production even after transport

Dear Friends,
We are using BI7.00 with Nw2004S. One of my report had been created in WAD (Web application designer). I have transported this report to production from Quality as in our case the Quality client is the base client for WAD report development. I collected the objects from the transport connection in RSA1 and transported the request.
After the above since user wanted changes in the report,i again modified the report and checked. Everything was fine in my Quality client but when i transported it to production, the new modifications are not appearing.
I have done the transport more than 2 times but still not changes is shown.
Experts kindly provide your helping hand.
Regards,
M.M

Dear Arun,
Thank you for your feedback. As per your guideline we executed the program RS_TEMPLATE_MAINTAIN_70 in both QAS and PRD clients and found that the html codes are same. Moreover we are still not able to get the modified web items in our PRD clients. All the caches were deleted and still no improvement. Following are the other activities and obeservations done by us.
1) Deleted the web item again in QAS client, Saved the report, recreated the web item, saved and then collected it in the request and transported and found that it is still not reflecting.
2) In our observation, we find that the objects are found collected in the transport request and the task of the transport request contains no element. We do not know whether it is right.
3) Missing of authorisation was also checked and found that it is not the culprit.
In the above context we are still groping in the dark. Kindly provide your expert comments.
Regards,
M.M

Trusted Reconciliation Status mapping does not work - 11g Release2

Hi all,
On my process for trusted reconciliation I have mapped my status attribute to Oim 'Status' attribute. It is as follow:
UserStatus -> Status
On my custom scheduled task I transform the status data get form HR (my trusted system) with the values 'Active', 'Disabled','Deleted' and create a reconciliation event.
Even the value I set for the status is 'Active' , afte reconciliation the status is not updated and it is 'Disabled'., what may be the problem? any help is strongly appreciated
Part of my reconciliation event creation code is as follow :
     params.put(AttributeConstants.TCMB.ROLE, "Consultant");
     params.put(AttributeConstants.TCMB.ORGANIZATION_NAME, "Xellerate Users");
     params.put(AttributeConstants.TCMB.XELLERATE_TYPE, "End-User");
     params.put(AttributeConstants.TCMB.DISPLAY_NAME, resourceData.getName()+" "+resourceData.getSoyadi());
     params.put(AttributeConstants.TCMB.IDENTITY_STATUS, UserManagerConstants.AttributeValues.USER_STATUS_ACTIVE.getId());
     System.out.println("Active param : "+UserManagerConstants.AttributeValues.USER_STATUS_ACTIVE.getId());
     System.out.println("Disabled param : "+UserManagerConstants.AttributeValues.USER_STATUS_DISABLED.getId());
     System.out.println("Deleted param : "+UserManagerConstants.AttributeValues.USER_STATUS_DELETED.getId());
     long result = recObject.createReconciliationEvent("TCMB_PBS_TRUSTED", params, true);
Thnaks in advance,
BR
Aliye

I would say don't supply status info for recon. OIM will update automatically based on start date and end date.
If you have special scenario then sure we have to map it and try params.put(AttributeConstants.TCMB.IDENTITY_STATUS,"Active") for same.
Better ignore passing status attribute. Lets OIM decide.
--nayan

BPM 11g Role Assignment not Reflected on BPM Workspace

Hi,
I'm having trouble with role maping in JDeveloper for my BPM 11g project, where the server groups mapped against a particular applcation role is not reflected in BPM workspace.
I'm mapping application roles with server groups in the Organization section of my BPM project in JDeveloper, but when I open the Administration section of the BPM workspace, I see that the appropriate section is blank where there should be the server group assigned.
I have confirmed that the server groups are in place, and have users associated with them. I even tried ti with the Administrators groups of WebLogic, with the same results.
However, when I deployed this same project on an Oracle On Demand server, the JDeveloper role maapping was successfully deployed along with my process. Could anyone please provide some insight in this matter?
I'm working on JDeveloper and SOA 11.1.1.5
Thanks,
Debojit

HI,
In 11g you have the concept of Global Links. You can refer to http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/user.1111/e15175/bpmug_ext_apps.htm#BACCACGI fro example of how this can be acheived
I think there are also some samples on java.net for Oracle BPM Suite however this appears to be down at the time of posting so I can not validate this.
Hope this helps
Regards Dave

Indent changing is possible but changes are not reflecting after refresh

Hello all,
I am facing one issue with alignment in the BEX. i need to changed the the result rows. initally the indent is 2 , am changing it to 1 and saving as existing report. after refreshing the workbook. the changes are not reflecting. can anybody provide me some inputs on these. any help is appreciated.

Hi Priya,
You need to Implement the following SNOTE's for these changes.
Union Budget 2015: As per Finance Bill 2015, the Government has implemented amendments to existing sections and introduced new sections in the Income Tax Act. Changes have been made in the following topics:
Tax Surcharge Rate
Increase in Conveyance Allowance
Section 80
Sukanya Samriddhi Scheme: The Government has launched this new deposit scheme for the minor girl child. This is a savings scheme that can be opened by the natural (biological) or legal guardian of a girl child aged below 10 years. Related Notes:
2139208 - Union Budget Changes – 2015
2138605 - Sec80C: Sukanya Samriddhi Scheme
Upcoming Developments:
PF Admin Charges Revision
Professional Tax for Mizoram & Nagaland states
Average Rate of Tax
Regards,
Venkat Polisetty

Changes made in RFC is not reflected in data services

Hi,
I am using a data service based on SAP R/3 RFC in my view
In my RFC i have some import parameters
and some export parameters
and when place a data service which is based on this RFC on the view for the first time , I am getting the import parameters and export parameters correctly
but the issue comes
when ever some one make changes in RFC and activating it again.
those changes are not reflected in data service (ex: a new import parameter is added or a parameter name is changed in the RFC, this is not reflected in data service)
i tried with deleting the existing data service and creating a new data service based on modified RFC
but even iam getting the data services details as pervious one ( as old data servie which i used at firt time)
why this is happening
how to solve this issue
regards
Srinivas

Hi,
Yes you need to restert the J2EE engine. Because when you imort it first time then it holdes it in cache memory. It will not be updated untill you restert the server. You restert the server then try it , you will get the right result for updated RFC.
Thanks
Chandan

LOV in Picklist is not reflected with Value Set maintained.

Value set A is contained the latest/updated list of Responsibility Center. Wheres one of the Picklist in Employee Self Service(OTL) which showing the lists of Responsiblity Center which query/calling the values maintained in Value Set A. However, the list of values does not contain the latest information which being maintained in Value Set A. On the other hand, when query from backend table for the Picklist function, the updated value in Value Set A is there.
Additional Infomation: Apache and application was bounced but the result still the same.
Please advice. Thanks.

Hi Hussien,
For your information, it is Release 12.1.1, db version is 10.2.0.4 and platform version is Oracle Solaris on SPARC (32-bit).
The article that you have provided does not applicable. This is only happen to the Cost Center LOV in the picklist which does not reflected even there is no end date in Value Set maintained.
Please advice. Thanks.
Regards,
CF

Universe export - data changes not reflecting in Report

Hi
The changes and the latest updates in the database are not reflecting in reports,
even if i export the universe again.
and i have refreshed the reports, that even not reflecting.
i did Edit query and Run query this action also not bringing the latest data to reports
why this happens ?
how to solve this issue ?
Regards
Dineshkumar

You can search for KB articles on SAP Service Market Place .
Here is first :
Symptom
You make changes a local Universe in Designer.
When refreshing the report, in Desktop Intelligence, the results do not reflect Universe update.
It used to be enough to simply refresh report's data, for Dataprovider to show object changes from the Semantic layer.
Change of behaviour in SP3 codeline: the DeskI Query Panel does not automatically pick up the latest modifications made to the local Universe.
Reproducing the Issue
Using BusinessObjects Desktop Intelligence XIR2 SP3:
Using your universe (eFashion), create and refresh a simple Desktop Intelligence report (.rep).
Make a simple change to the universe (like renaming a field/ object name) and save these changes.
Go back to the open DeskI report and try to refresh the data provider using: 'Data/Refresh Data'.
This will not show the latest changes.
However, if you follow the same workflow using XIR2 SP2, the universe update will be immediately visible (in the report) simply after refresh.
Cause
This is not a product regression, but intentional change in application's code delivered with FixPack3.1.
Fix Request ADAPT00818520 changed the application's behaviour: << When a restricted user is logged on to view a Desktop Intelligence document, prompt windows may be slow to open. >>
Resolution
In Desktop Intelligence menu, go to: Tools > Universes
Click 'Refresh'
Select and 'Import' your universe
Next, go to toolbar menu: Data > Edit Data Provider
In Query Panel, click 'Run' to regenerate the Query and interrogate the updated universe.
Only after following these actions will the .unv ammendments be visible in the report.
Here is second :
Symptom
Changes to object made for the Universe is not affected when refreshed from InfoView if we check 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' in Universe Designer
Desktop Intelligence (Deski) Report still prompts for selection of contexts even if 'Allow selection of contexts' is unchecked for Universe
Row level Restriction is not applied correctly in InfoView(View Mode) when 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' checked in the Universe Designer
Environment
BusinessObjects Enterprise XI 3.1 Service Pack 2 Fix Pack 2.6
Reproducing the Issue
Changes to object made in the Universe is not affected in InfoView(View mode) when 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' is checked in Universe
1. Log in to Designer
i) Import Island Resort Marketing
ii) Go to Universe Parameter >> SQL
ii)Uncheck Allow Selection of Multiple Context
2. Create a new Desktop Intelligence(Deski) Report based on Island Resort Marketing
i) Drag the object Country in the Result's Pane
ii) Save and Export the report to the repository.
3. In Designer Change the Object Country under Resort from Resort_Country.country to
i) Resort_Country.country+'ddd'
Note: Uncheck Allow Selection of Multiple Context
ii) Save and Export the Universe
4. Log in to InfoView
i) View the report
ii) Refresh the report
iii) Changes to the object taken place i.e Country is concatenated with ddd
5. In the Universe Designer, change the Object Country under Resort from Resort_Country.country to
i) Resort_Country.country+'eee'
Note: Check Allow Selection of Multiple Context
ii) Save and Export the Universe
6. Log out from InfoView and login again
i) View the report
ii) Refresh the report
iii) Changes not taken place. Shows only Country instead of Country concatenated with eee.
Row level Restriction is not applied correctly in InfoView(view Mode) when 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' checked for the Universe.
Import efashion Universe
Drag the Outlet_Lookup table into the objects pane on the left hand side
Create Row Level Restriction on the state field of Outlet_Lookup table as Outlet_Lookup.State=(u2018Texasu2019)
Apply the restriction to Administrator
Save and Export the Universe. Note: Uncheck Allow Selection of Multiple Context in Universe Parameter>>SQL
Log in to Desktop Intelligence (Deski) as administrator with Enterprise Authentication
Create a new Deski report
Drag the object state from the Outlet_Lookup table to the Results pane
Observed that the administrator is able to see only Texas which is expected behavior
Save and export the report
Log in to Infoview as Administrator
View the report. Refresh the report
Observed that the administrator is able to see only Texas which is expected behavior
Log in to Infoview as any user say Test User
View the report. Refresh the report
Observed that Test User is able to see all the states which is expected behavior
In the Universe Designer, Check Allow Selection of Multiple Context in Universe Parameter>>SQL for efashion Universe
Save and export the Universe
Log in to Infoview as Test user
View the report
Refresh the Report
TestUser is able to see only Texas which mean that the restriction is applied to Test User also
Cause
This is by Design as the 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' forces selection of the context, which is not possible in Infoview, so that in Infoview it is assumed the Context is already selected and no SQL regeneration is required.
Resolution
Problem Description: Changes to object made in the Universe is not affected when refreshed from InfoView if we check 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' in Universe Designer
Explanation:
If we modify an object and selects also the option 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts', it means that potentially there is more than one SQL that can be generated with the use of that object. Hence if a report is created in Deski, run and exported to enterprise, that means, one particular context (SQL) has been selected.
If you then update one or more of the objects again, the SQL will have to be regenerated in Deski for the right context to be selected for that particular report.
Therefore, if this option is used, for the objects to be updated, the SQL of the report will have to be regenerated in Deski, run and export it back to repository, then refresh the report in InfoView.
For Deski reports viewed in InfoView, it is not possible to evaluate the context on refresh. The report will always use the context stored with the report and same for the SQL. Therefore the Deski report will need to be imported locally, refresh it and then export it back to repository for the changes to take place.
Problem description: Desktop Intelligence (Deski) still prompts for selection of contexts even if 'Allow selection of contexts' is unchecked for Universe
Explanation:
The option 'Allow selection of Multiple Contexts' in Designer is not to disable the prompt. It will prompt you to select context if the object used is associated with context. The option is just to allow Deski to select multiple contexts at a time if in case the object used is associated with multiple contexts and accordingly generates the SQL.
However if we uncheck the option even if there are multiple contexts associated with the object used, it will allow selection of only one context at a time.
Problem Description: Issue with Row level Restriction when refreshed from InfoView with 'Allow selection of multiple Contexts' checked for the Universe.
Explanation:
We first have to regenerate the SQL in Deski, then export it to repository and refresh from InfoView for the changes to take place correctly. The explanation above applies.

Activity result not appearing

Hi,
Activity result is not reflecting even after i created entries in industry specific area in SPRO. CRM> Tramsactions> Activities-->industry specific entries
Can any one help me with a detailed procedure...
Regards,
AR

Hi AR
Go to SPRO --> CRM
Transactions --> Define activity reason --> Define code group profile
For ex. If you are using A2, select A2 and you can see all the code groups assinged to it
Each code group has different codes with in it.
In definition of code group profile you can define all the code groups that are applicable for tht profile. For ex. you can select ACT000001 and see all the code groups that are applicable
Now go to define subect profile. For example ACT000002
You can assign catalog A2 and code group profile ACT000001 to this. You will be able to see all the code groups too.
Now go to transaction customizing for activities and assign status and subject profile for each transaction type
Here you mention for your trasaction type and for different status the subject profile that is applicable. Ex 0001, E001 with ACT000002.
You now will be able to see all the different reasons which will appear as combination of code groups and codes
Rgs

Reconciliation - Recon even results not reflected in child forms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for