Report Navigation Issue after upgrading from 10g to 11g

Hi Experts
I have recently upgarded my solution from 10g to 11g. Issue is when I click on column value for navigation it doen't navigate the display remains unchanged
1) I have created new dashboard and placed this report in new dashboard the navigation works fine.
2) I have created new report and placed that report in old dashboard it doesn't work
why is it so I undertand that there is problem with Dashboard and not with report but I am unable to figure it out
what can be the problem? any suggestions
Thanks
Sameer

Similar Messages

Images after upgrade from 10g to 11g

We recently upgraded from 10g to 11g and all the images are broke in the dashboard.
Can anyone provide the steps needs to be done in order to fix the broken images?
Thanks.

Put image files at
Drive:\Oracle\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\bifoundation\web\app\res\s_blafp\images
Drive:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\bifoundation_domain\servers\bi_server1\tmp\_WL_user\analytics_11.1.1\7dezjl\war\res\s_blafp\images
If required
Drive:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\bifoundation_domain\servers\AdminServer\tmp\.appmergegen_1291264099332\analytics.ear\ukjjdc\res\s_blafp\images
Call them using fmap
Syntax: fmap:images/imagename.imageformat
for e.g: fmap:images/geograph.jpg
Pls mark correct/helpful if helps

ODI Procedures not working after upgrading from 10G to 11G

Hello Gurus,
We have run into a scenario where the procedures in ODI are not working after we upgraded it from 10G to 11G (11.1.1.6). However we can make it to run if we create the procedure from scratch.
Also we are having issues related to packages where in the packages were running before we applied the patch 11.1.1.6.3. And after applying the patches they are not running.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks

If you want someone to help you, please be elaborate in the exact errors you are getting.
A general statement would do nothing but guess work.
What is the error that you get while executing the procedure.
What are the exact issues that you get while executing packages ?

Report printing issue after upgrading from LV 8.2 to LV 2009

Hello,
I am upgrading an application from LabView 8.2 to LabView 2009. It uses the Report Generation Toolkit to create reports based on Word templates. The reports are pretty complicated, with a lot of bookmarks, tables, and graphs, but only one page long.
The reports are generated correctly. However when sent to printing (using Print report.vi), the printer goes into spooling status and if you are patient enough you may get the report after at least 7 minutes. I tried changing the printer setting to "Print directly to the printer", as per an old KnowledgeBase article. No luck. I have installed a local printer. No luck again.
If I close the LabView application while the printer is shown in spooling status, the report prints right away, every time.
Never had this issue in LabView 8.2. On that machine I had Office XP. Now I have Office 2007...
I do not get any error whatsoever, and I cannot figure out where the solution may be.
I have one single report that prints right away every time I try. Coincidence or not, this is the only one that has no tables to print. It has graph though and plenty of bookmarks.
I have exhausted all the ideas on how to deal with this situation, and I must find a solution ASAP. Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.

Brandon,
Thanks for your input.
Not sure how I can use it to narrow down the problem though. I ran it, and I see that the printers are correctly identified, the default one is correctly found, however absolutely nothing is being printed out (I typed a text in the string control, and the Print control was on).
Everything runs with no errors. I would prefer to see a bunch of errors ...

After Migrating from 10g to 11g Geeting problems with Guided navigations.

After Migrating from 10g to 11g Geeting problems with Guided navigations and section navigations not working.
And we are getting the following error <<odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW)>> where we have used navigations.
In 10G we have Guided navigation Reports to display the Reports links and intermediate reports for conditionally displaying the Dashboard section(Reports) but after migrating to 11g Guided navigation reports and conditional reports are not working..
We know that in 11g section navigation replaced with conditions and Guided navigation replaced with action link.. but
do we need to recreate those reports in actions and condition or is there any work around avoid reworking.

Hi Both,
Thanks for the reply ...
For Guided navigation we are getting like below error:
Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
For Conditional dashboard section we are getting like below error:
"saw.aViewsToRefresh = [];saw.aViewsToRefresh['d:dashboard~p:1egt6il5utl0uu8n~s:3jsmgfs3c1r4tn7c~n:condition'] = true;saw.aViewsToRefresh['d:dashboard~p:1egt6il5utl0uu8n~s:nos5q43jvjmi643b~n:condition'] = true;"

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

Stability issues after upgrade from 5 to 6.1?

Dear all,
my client plans to upgrade from WLS 5 to 6.1 soon. The application is
an intranet portal with Epicentric and Vignette used as additional
products.
However, some voices say that 6.1 has stability issues. Well, these
statements are rumours and lack any proof or even anecdotal evidence I
have heard of, and therefore it is very difficult to respond
appropriately.
Having said this, my questions are:
- Did any of you have stability issues after upgrading from 5 to 6.1
on Solaris?
- If yes, what were they and how did you solve them (e.g. upgrade to
SP 5)?
- In 1-2 sentences, what is the context of the application?
My goal is to present a evidence that the romoured stability issues
don't exist or/and a list of meastures to avoid/solve them, if any.
Many thanks in advance
Andreas

"Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
my client plans to upgrade from WLS 5 to 6.1 soon. The application is
an intranet portal with Epicentric and Vignette used as additional
products.
However, some voices say that 6.1 has stability issues. Well, these
statements are rumours and lack any proof or even anecdotal evidence I
have heard of, and therefore it is very difficult to respond
appropriately.
Having said this, my questions are:
- Did any of you have stability issues after upgrading from 5 to 6.1
on Solaris?
- If yes, what were they and how did you solve them (e.g. upgrade to
SP 5)?
- In 1-2 sentences, what is the context of the application?
My goal is to present a evidence that the romoured stability issues
don't exist or/and a list of meastures to avoid/solve them, if any.Hi Andreas,
Normally proving that rumors are true is a responcibility of
rumors suppliers. Reverse does sound to me like a joke.
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
P.S. Current weblogic 6.1 is a stable product.

After Upgrade OBI 10g to 11g:Odbc driver returned an error - SQLExecDirectW

Hi all,
for an OBI upgrade from 10g to 11g I used a RPD and Webcatalog based on a remote machine other than my local machine. Firstable I am making the tests on a Linux Virtual machine, which uses the Sample Lite version from Oracle.
I made the following steps:
1. I upgraded the RPD and Webcatalog. It worked without any errors.
2. I set the static variable BI_EE_HOME via Administration Tool to the path in the Linux machine.
--> Here I am not sure if the set path is correct. It begins with: \bi\ ...\instances\...\coreapplication_obis1 (... : I can't mention here the whole path name).
--> When the OBI Server is installed in Windows, the mentioned static variable points to something like 'C:\<install folder>\...\coreapplication_obis1'
--> Question: is the begin of my set path correct?. I set that pointing to the Linux OBI Server, because the OBI Server is installed on Linux.
Problem:
After login as the user in RPD: Administrator/<Password for my upgraded RPD> I can see the links in the Catalog and the Dashboards links. But I can not see any values, any Reports when going through the links.
For example when trying to see a Dashboard with date 12.02.2011it happens:
Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
Status: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] general error.
[nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS.
[nQSError: 43119] Query Failed:
[nQSError: 17001] Oracle Error code: 12154, message: ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified
at OCI call OCIServerAttach.
[nQSError: 17014] Could not connect to Oracle database. (HY000)
SQL Issued: SELECT "Dimension_-_My Dimension"."MyDimension" saw_0 FROM "Accounting (ACC)" WHERE "Dimension_-_My Dimension"."MyDimension" LIKE 'J%' ORDER BY saw_0
I think its not retrieving the data from the remote database, because I don't have the data of the remote database in my local. I think the OBI Server still is pointing to the local virtual machine Oracle database.
Can anybody tell me what happens here and how can I solve this problem?.
I would appreciate any help....

Hi gerardnico,
I've tried many things and did as in your articles, but I don't have success with that.
These are the things I did:
1. I searched for the file tnsnames.ora in my Linux virtual machine. I could find it in many paths:
/.../Oracle_BI1/network/admin/samples/tnsnames.ora
/.../oracle/xe/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/server/hs/admin/tnsnames.ora.sample
/.../oracle/xe/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/server/network/admin/tnsnames.ora
/.../oracle/xe/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/server/network/admin/samples/tnsnames.ora
/.../oracle/xe/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/server/network/admin/temp/tnsnames.ora
/.../usr/lib/oracle/xe/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/server/network/admin
in the last path I found the listener.ora as well.
2. I took the tnsnames.ora from the last path, because the ORACLE_HOME points to /.../usr/lib/oracle/xe/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/server
3. I edited the tnsnames.ora this way:
# tnsnames.ora Network Configuration File:
XE =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = host_of_the_remote_machine)(PORT = 1521))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVER = DEDICATED)
(SERVICE_NAME = database_name_of_the_remote_machine)
EXTPROC_CONNECTION_DATA =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = IPC)(KEY = EXTPROC_FOR_XE))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = database_SID_of_the_remote_machine)
(PRESENTATION = RO)
4. I made a backup of the tnsnames.ora in path /.../Oracle_BI1/network/admin/samples/tnsnames.ora
and copied the tnsnames.ora from /.../usr/lib/oracle/xe/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/server/network/admin to the Oracle_BI1 path
5. I set the TNS_ADMIN to /.../usr/lib/oracle/xe/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/server/network/admin
6. I restarted the BI Server
No success in what I did. The error is still there.
7. I've tried also: sqlplus database_user_remote_machine/database_password_remote_machine@database_SID_remote_machine
I didn't get the connection:
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Thu Jun 16 04:36:10 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
ERROR:
ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified
Enter user-name: database_user_remote_machine
Enter password:
ERROR:
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist
Linux Error: 2: No such file or directory
What am I doing wrong here?. I am still thinking that I need the import of the database.
Additional SID=Service-Name=Database-name in the remote machine.

NQS ERROR:14025 NO FACT TABLE EXISTS -after migrating from 10g to 11g

NQS ERROR:14025 NO FACT TABLE EXISTS AT THE REQUESTED LEVEL OF DETAIL in all the reports after migrating from 10g to 11g ...
then we applied the patch (One-off Patch for Bug: 11850704) for the error <<NQS ERROR:14025 NO FACT TABLE EXISTS AT THE REQUESTED LEVEL OF DETAIL>>
But after applying the above the above patch we are still getting the same error.
but in the above patch instructions file - Post deployment instructions to create the Variable
Post Install Instructions:
- To revert to the 10g navigator behavior for handling conforming dimensions,
you must set the following session variable via an init block in the RPD:
NO_FORCE_TO_DETAIL_BIN=1
The default value for the above variable is 0.
- Restart all servers (Admin Server and all Managed Server(s))
but we didn’t find the process to create the specified variable and Initialization block in the RPD
Can you please suggest us how to go further.
Our questions are:

Hi
Refer the below thread.
obiee 11g non-conforming dimensions and nQSError 14025
Might be help you/
Thanks,
satya

Oracle Upgrade from 10g to 11g [BRANCHED BY MODERATOR]

Hi Deepak/Folks,
Another question that I have is that while doing the Oracle Upgrade on an EP server, the patches were not installed properly and I had to shut down the Patches installation after it did not do anything for a while.
Now when I try to install the patches it fails telling me that the Installed patches cannot be verified, I had written to SAP and they told me to follow the
SAP note 1862446 - Inventory
load failed... OPatch cannot load inventory for the given Oracle Home
and re-create the oracle inventory.
This has also not helped in anyway.
Is there a solution to this problem.
Following is the error that I am getting when I try to Install the patches
Getting pre-run patch inventory...
Getting pre-run patch inventory...failed.
Cannot get pre-run patch inventory.
Refer to log file
$ORACLE_HOME/cfgtoollogs/mopatch/mopatch-2014_08_06-14-52-51.log
when I open the log file specified here I get the following
more mopatch-2014_08_06-14-52-51.log
more /oracle/<SID>/11203/cfgtoollogs/mopatch/mopatch-2014_08_06-15-01-51.log
MOPatch - Install Multiple Oracle Patches in One Run - 2.1.15.
Copyright (c) 2007, 2013, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Version:       2.1.15
Revision:      5.1.2.26
Command-line: /oracle/<SID>/11203/MOPatch/mopatch.sh -v -s SAP11203P_1312-20009978.zip
Oracle Home:   /oracle/<SID>/11203
RDBMS version: 11.2.0.3.0
OPatch version:11.2.0.3.3
Clean-up:      supported
PSUs:          supported
Log file:      $ORACLE_HOME/cfgtoollogs/mopatch/mopatch-2014_08_06-15-01-51.log
Patch base:    .
Patch source: SAP11203P_1312-20009978.zip
Link script:   ./link.mts<SID>ua.sh
Readmes:       <none>
Strpd. Readmes:<none>
make utility: /usr/ccs/bin/make
unzip utility: /oracle/<SID>/11203/bin/unzip
User name:     ora<SID>
Working dir:   /oracle/stage
System:        HP-UX mts<SID>ua B.11.31 U ia64 2468369872 unlimited-user license
Disk free:     11734549 KBytes on /oracle/<SID>
Disk required: 886496 KBytes on /oracle/<SID>
Getting pre-run patch inventory...
executing: "/oracle/<SID>/11203/OPatch/opatch" lsinventory -retry 0 -xml "./mopatch-187-21696-tmpdir/preinv.xml"
========================================================
GENERIC OPATCH VERSION - FOR USE IN SAP ENVIRONMENT ONLY
========================================================
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 11.2.0.3.3
Copyright (c) 2012, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Oracle Home       : /oracle/<SID>/11203
Central Inventory : /oracle/<SID>/oraInventory
   from           : /oracle/<SID>/11203/oraInst.loc
OPatch version    : 11.2.0.3.3
OUI version       : 11.2.0.3.0
Log file location : /oracle/<SID>/11203/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2014-08-06_15-01-56PM_1.log
List of Homes on this system:
Inventory load failed... OPatch cannot load inventory for the given Oracle Home.
Possible causes are:
   Oracle Home dir. path does not exist in Central Inventory
   Oracle Home is a symbolic link
   Oracle Home inventory is corrupted
LsInventorySession failed: OracleHomeInventory gets null oracleHomeInfo
OPatch failed with error code 73
Getting pre-run patch inventory...failed.
Cannot get pre-run patch inventory. Exiting.
I would appreciate if you folks can help me out on this
Thanks
APS

FOLLOW UP QUESTION BRANCHED:
Oracle Upgrade from 10g to 11g [BRANCHED BY MODERATOR]

Sorting issue after upgrade from 9i to 10g

Dear all,
It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
Thanks for your help,
M.T.

903714 wrote:
Dear all,
It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
Thanks for your help,
M.T. This is expected behavior in 10g. Oracle will not order the dataset for you unless and until you explicitly specify it.
So without using order by clause in 10g, oracle doesn't guarantee that rows will be ordered.
To go back to old behavior like 9i, you can set a workaround by
alter session set "_newsort_enabled"=false;
Also see MOS - Order Of Data Retrieval Differs after upgrading 9i To 10g [ID 456707.1]

Issues after Upgrade from Oracle 10.1.0.5 to 10.2.0.5 in Windows Server2003

Good Morning Good People,
I have run in to some issues after upgrading my 10.1.0.5 database to 10.2.0.5. Initially after the firtst upgrade from 10.1.0.5 to 10.2.0.0 one has to run Critical Patch set 4 to get to 10.2.0.5. Well after initial up grade everything worked fine. I could connect to the database from within the server as well as remotely through SQL*PLUS client. However, after completeing the patch I'm still able to connect to the database from within the server, but remotely i get the following error:
ORA-12514 : TNS Listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor.
I also get Error ORA-12505: TNS:listener does not currently know of SID given in connect descriptor The Connection descriptor used by the client was: (description=(address=(host=mcquery2)(protocol=tcp)(port=1521))(connect_data=(sid=mcquery)(server=dedicated)))
I've tried serval different things to trouble shoot the issue but nothing seems to work.
If anyone has run into s similar issue please help. This is ruining my weekend! LOL!
Edited by: user10835577 on Aug 29, 2010 9:15 AM

From the client or the server?
SERVER:
tnsnames.ora:
MCQUERY=
(DESCRIPTION=
(ADDRESS=
(PROTOCOL=TCP)
(HOST=10.36.27.184)
(PORT=1521)
(CONNECT_DATA=
(SERVICE_NAME=MCQUERY)
listener.ora
SID_LIST_LISTENER =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\product\10.1.0\Db_1)
(PROGRAM = extproc)
LISTENER =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 10.36.27.184)(PORT = 1521))
FROM REMOTE SQLPLUS Client:
tnsnames.ora
MCQUERY=
(DESCRIPTION=
(ADDRESS=
(PROTOCOL=TCP)
(HOST=10.36.27.184)
(PORT=1521)
(CONNECT_DATA=
(SERVICE_NAME=MCQUERY)
listener.ora
SID_LIST_LISTENER =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = D:\oracle\product\10.1.0\Client_3)
(PROGRAM = extproc)
LISTENER =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = cotsdot370.cotsdot.dom)(PORT = 1521))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 10.36.27.184)(PORT = 1521))
Thanks,
Malcolm
Edited by: user10835577 on Aug 29, 2010 12:01 PM

Report Layout Changed After Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

Dear Gurus,
I do functional test of every process in ECC6 after upgrade from 4.6C. I found all report layout changed without variant (it's happen to all Query/SQ01 reports ). So I've to assign manually the fields for the reports, and create a default variant then.
Why it happen ? Is there configuration or setting missed or this is standard while we do upgrade ?
Thx in advance.
Tri Wicaksono

We do re arrange for all ALV report ...

Check list for upgrading from 10g to 11g when there is a schema replication

Hi
We are looking to upgrade one of our production database from 10g to 11g
Currently this database has one schema that is replicated to 2 other databases using Oracle streams.
The replication is excluing DDLs and excluding several other application tables.
What should I do pre and post the upgrade ?
should we remove the stream configuration all together and rebuild it after the upgrade ?
I was hoping that we can first upgrade the two target databases to 11g and then the source database, without impacting our streams configuration at all
Is that possible ?
Is there any documentation on the subject ?
thanks in advance
Orna

Pl post the OS versions of the source and target servers, along with exact (4-digit) versions of "10g" and "11g". I do not have any experience with streams, but the 11gR2 Upgrade Doc suggests that you upgrade the downstream target databases first before upgrading the source - http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10819/upgrade.htm#CIAFJJFC
HTH
Srini

.Database upgrade from 10g to 11g in Oracle EBS 11i

Hi,
An urgent help is needed.I am upgrading Oracle Database from 10g to 11g.My EBS is version 11i.So after upgrading my database
from 10g to 11g as sa sanity check what are the parameters we need to take care of the EBS.My point is will there be any Application level changes if the database
is upgraded?Wiill the Workflow and what other things we had to do the sanity check if its working properly?Any Concurent Program level changes be affected?
Thanks and Regards
Edited by: 918308 on May 10, 2013 7:52 PM

918308 wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the info provided but i dont have the metalink id.Kindly can you provide me the link for the subjected docs so that i can relate.Any application level testing to be done?Concurrent Programs,Schedule Manager,Workflow etc.?We cannot post the contents of MOS docs since this violates Oracle support agreement policy.
You need to go a regular sanity check (i.e. submit concurrent programs, check workflow functionality, ..etc) -- E-Business Suite Diagnostics 11i Test Catalog [ID 179661.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Report Navigation Issue after upgrading from 10g to 11g

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for