Restriction for table maintainence

Hello Gurus,
I am working on a SLO project, where i had merged 5 source systems to one system.
In few roles in source systems for table maintainence the authorization groups is maintained as '*' in production.
In source systems if they maintain * they would be able to display/change the data related to that system only.
But now in target system , if we maintain * in authorization group they are able to display/change the data related to all the 5 systems.
This need to restricted, Please provide some pointers on how this can be done.
This restriction should be in such a way that they should be able to change data related to the system they belong to .
Thanks,
Sanketh.

>
Sanketh Teegala wrote:
> Thanks for the reply prashanth.
>
> But , suppose consider users are maintaining table T001B. ( they are maintaining it through parameter transactions).
> as it is a standard table it has been assigned to same authorization group in both source and target systems.
> In source system , user is able to view data related only that system.
> But in target system user is able to view other system data also.
>
> How can i restrict this data ?
>
> Thanks,
> Sanketh.
Hi Sanketh,
I hope you are progressing with your SLO task. Once you have finished this project, most things will be simple in comparison
Unfortunately your requirement is not a simple one
You could use line item auths (nasty to set up IMO). Have a search for info on auth object S_TABU_LIN
Alternatively you could introduce auth checks on key auth fields (e.g. BUKRS, WERKS etc) into the method that you use to display table data. This would likely require new transactions with validation code that is performed before data is displayed or limits what can be updated. Another messy approach would be to use parameter transactions that pass in an org unit into the table selection criteria. You would need one for each org unit so will likely not be practicable.
What I would say is that focus on what is legally required. If none of it is required by law then focus on getting the rest of your consolidation done first and then address this in partnership with your project development team.

Similar Messages

Transport request for table maintainence

Hi
I created table maintenance for a ZTABLE but it didn't ask me any transport request.So i created the entries for the table maintenance manually ( R3TR TOBJ ZEREC S ) in my transport request. Now I am afraid will it give me any error during transportation to quality client.
What do I need to do in order the system to prompt transport request.
Kindly suggest me in transporting the table maintenance.
Thanks and Regards

Hi
Welcome to SDN forum
While creating the Table Maintenance itself it will promt for the Transport request
while entering data it won't ask for transport request.
You can check in the transport request task whether the table Maintenance is created or not under that request in SE09 or SE10. check the functiongroup which you have added to this TMG while creating. In the request you can see that.
Or you can add the table entries under the request using SE03
object Directory-> change Object directory entries
there should be an entry in the request like
R3TR - TABU - < table name>
then if you transport the entries will be transported.
<b>Reward points for useful Answers</b>
Regards
Anji

Restriction for table colum 'name'

Hi there,
I was trying to select from a table whose column name begins with a number.I get an error 'From keyword not found where expected'.
Oracle 10g version.
Table columns
1. annual_std_dev number
2. 24_hour_mean number
3. Year varchar2
select 24_hour_mean number from table1 where year = '2007'; Thanks

Becuase the number is at the beggining of the column name you have to use double quotes when using this column. And it had to be created using the double quotes
select "24_hour_mean" from table ...

Transaction code for Table Maitainence for table

Hi all,
i have created Table Maintainece for Table and also i need to create transaction code
for table maintainence.
there when i create transaction code with TRANSACTION with PARAMETERS and SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
I can see all the records in the table into table Maintainence.
Is ther is any possibility like i can restrict records on the key fields (like selection screen).
Will anybody let me know how to goahead with this requirement.
Regards,
Madhavi

You can build a small report that call the maintenance view. In the report, convert the SELECT-OPTIONS input to the [DBA_SELLIST|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/advancedsearch?cat=sdn_all&query=dba_sellist&adv=false&sortby=cm_rnd_rankvalue] parameter of function module [VIEW_MAINTENANCE_CALL|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/advancedsearch?cat=sdn_all&query=view_maintenance_call&adv=false&sortby=cm_rnd_rankvalue].
If you have "pertinent" key to filter the data, you may define these as sub-key in a mainetance view, those fields will be asked for when entering the maintanance dialog. Or you can build a [view cluster|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/advancedsearch?cat=sdn_all&query=se55&adv=false&sortby=cm_rnd_rankvalue] using these sub-set keys.
Regards

Creation of Table Maintainence Generator for Standard table

Hi,
I need to create a table maintainence generator for a standard SAP table.
The end user need have to delete certain entries from the table.
Is it viable to go for a table maintaninence generator or go for program which will delete the entry from the standard SAP table.
Which is the best method to go.
Thanks in Advance,
Irfan Hussain

Hi,
But i think there is a differtent procedure to create a table maintainenece generator for the standard SAP tables than normal Ztables.
I thinl we need to take access key and do the modification.
Thanks in Advance,
Irfan Hussain

Error while creating table maintainence generator !

Hi All ,
I want to create a table maintainence generator for table ZZFTLPNT . However I am getting the following error :
Typ Message text                                                           LTxt
    Field ZZZFTLPNT-RRCTY shortened (new visible length: 000015)
    Field ZZZFTLPNT-DRCRK shortened (new visible length: 000015)
    Field ZZZFTLPNT-ROBJNR shortened (new visible length: 000009)
    Field ZZZFTLPNT-SOBJNR shortened (new visible length: 000009)
    Field ZZZFTLPNT-RRCTY shortened (new visible length: 000007)
    Field ZZZFTLPNT-DRCRK shortened (new visible length: 000007)
    Field ZZZFTLPNT-ROBJNR shortened (new visible length: 000004)
    Field ZZZFTLPNT-SOBJNR shortened (new visible length: 000004)
    Field ZZZFTLPNT-RRCTY shortened (new visible length: 000003)
    Screen SAPLZZZFTLPNT                           0001 could not be gene
    Memory for screen LOAD   is used up. bytes) is not
Please advise .

Hi Pankaj
it is "Display/Maintenace allowed" and delivery class is 'A' .
Edited by: Ambar Patil on Dec 9, 2008 11:59 AM
Edited by: Ambar Patil on Dec 9, 2008 12:01 PM

Table Maintainence generator Error Special Character '_' in generic key

Hello,
I have created a Table which contain 6 fields. All the fields of the table are primary key. The combined length of all the primary key is 163 characters. In the activation Log of the table we have a warning message which states "Key length > 120 (Restricted functionality)". Initially we are able maintain the entries using SM30. BUt now when we are making the entreis in the table an error message comes. The error is Special character "_" in generic key.and we are not able to save the entries.
I have deleted the table maintainence generator and have regenerated it. But the same error is coming.
Please provide your suggestion.
Thanks,
Mohit

Please provide your suggestions
Thanks,
Mohit

Validate the records in table maintainence generator

hi to all experts,
this is raj.............
i have query to ask to all experts...
"i have to validate the records or entries before populating
into the table using table maintainence generator"
can anybody help out in this...
regards,
raj
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Oct 24, 2008 11:52 AM

hi...
write u r code in the screen number spicefied ...in PAI
MODULE CHECK_BEFORE_INSERT ON CHAIN-REQUEST.
in this module u can write code for validation
thanks
sam

Restrict HR tables

Hi
Could you pls tell me How to restrict HR tables in S_TABU_DIS and display all other
thanks in Advance

Hi Prasad,
As I said, identify all the authorisation groups placed on the HR tables and make sure that these are <i>not</i> included in S_TABU_DIS for the normal users.
Your HR team will tell you exactly which tables contain sensitive data. All the tables that don't have an authorisation group assigned to them (you can see this in table TDDAT) should have an authorisation group assigned against them. Not all HR tables are just in the H* and P* name spaces so you need to get the input from someone who properly understands the tables (you may be able to find a list somewhere here: SAP ERP Human Capital Management (SAP ERP HCM))
This way you can split table access between Non-HR (They don't have any HR relevant table auth groups in S_TABU_DIS field DICBERCLES) and HR (They have access to the restricted auth groups).
It's not a straightforward piece of work as access to tables via SE16 etc (I assume that's why you need to protect the data) is not designed for granular access without a considerable amount of additional work being involved.
I hope that answers your question

Tracking User Defined Table Maintainence

Hi ,
I have a requirement where i have provided a table maintainence generator for a user defined table .
My user needs the track of all the users who edit the table .
Please advice as soon as possible

Hi,
in transaction SE11 -> Goto -> Technical settings there is a checkbox at the bottom (log data changes). See F1 help for it.
Reward points if useful.
Regards, Marina

Drop down in Table Maintainence Gen

Hi all,
I'm facing a problem in table maintainence generator main view screen...i've got two fields in my db table and i've created search help for both the fields for drop down option for both the fields in main view screen.....but the first field shows up drop down option were in the other does'nt....i've changed the layout of the screen and lenght of the text element as well, even altered or changed the length of the view screen but its not working out....what i'm i suppose to do to get show up the drop down option for the other field too so as to make the the end user find the list of entries in the field..............any suggestion or changes would be really appreciated and correct answers would be surely rewarded....
Answer need urgenlty..........

Check whether in the attributes of the field, whether you have put the "Dropdown" value for your field as "Listbox" or "Listbox with key".
Also check whether you have referenced the field directly to the data element.
HOpe this helps.
Thanks
Balaji

Sorting in table maintainence

hi
i need to have sorting icon in a table maintainece i have crated
a table maintainece tcod in se93 for a table but when i execure teh tcode and go to table maintianece
no sorting icons are shown
my requirment is that user is able to sort on basis or the fields in the table also
pls suggest how to do it.
regards
Arora

first u need to go to /nse11->give the table ->table maintainence generator->click on the Maintain screen-> ..it will take u to a module pool program.
then go to screen .place a button for sort and then write logic for sort in the PAI of the module pool.This should work...
Revert back if any doubt
Reema

Need information for table maintenance genarator?

HI Sir,
I have a tcode for table maintenance generator of Z table, my requirement is to add new field to that Z table.
Is it required to maintain table maintenance generator again for that table and how to assign the same tcode for that.
plz help me to solve this.
thanks and regards
syed
Basic question. Please put some effort from your side before posting here. You have already been warned against breaking the rules of this forum. Continued violations will lead to account deletion.
Edited by: kishan P on Sep 2, 2010 11:59 AM

Hi Taj,
When you add your new field in the table, the table gets partially active first, then you need to Adjust the table using Database Utility (SE14) to get the table activated.
For Database Utility see online help [Database Utility|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/EN/a4/3790360ee65840e10000009b38f839/frameset.htm]
Then You need to regenerate the table maintainence Generator.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Abhii
Edited by: Abhii on Sep 2, 2010 7:06 AM

Authoization Issue for tables

Hi,
   We have got two master tables which is maintained by a ABAP program. This has a similar affect like sm30. These tables are not generated by Table maintainence generator but via ABAP program using different function modules for eg:
CALL FUNCTION 'VIEW_MAINTENANCE_CALL'
    EXPORTING
      action                = p_action
      view_name             = lv_view
      complex_selconds_used = 'X'
    TABLES
      dba_sellist           = t_dba_sellist.
Now the issue is how to provide display authorization to this Z master tables. We want some users to have display and other superusers to maintain this tables.
Can anyone help me out please.
Regards
Raj.

Thanks Guys but I think you didnt get my problem. As I said the maintainence view is called from the program with out any authorisation object in the maintainence generator.
These z master tables are called via a main program using user command or function codes attached to it. When you press on a particular icon these function codes get activated and the maintainence tables are executed via the maintainence function.
We have two users :
Manager - he needs to maintain those tables
General User - he has to have a display authorisation
Please advice me how to give display authorisations for such individiual tables.
Rgds
Raj.

Restrictions for sdo_geor.mosaic

Hi All
i have a set of georeferenced images which are ready to be mosaiced , in the sense that there is no overlap or gap in between the images. Spatial Index is also created on the table . But still i get error when i do a sdo_geor.mosaic.
ORA-13419 cannot perform mosaick operation on the specified table column
All the images have the same resolution, same number of bands . is there any other restriction for the images to be mosaiced.
i have put the coverage of images on following url
http://www.geocities.com/jaleelahmed/coverage.html
each red block is one image (one row in my georaster table)
Any advice is appreciated.
Thanks
Ab

Ab,
The beta1 of the next release will be avaialbale in this fall. There is no officially fixed date for the next release yet. The new mosaic would be able to automatically handle this case as long as there is no overlapping. The mosaic object would be sort of sparse so that the missing image tiles would not consume any disk space.
Still, I think your project is doable using the 10g mosaic as long as the images meet the requirements outlined under the Usage Notes of SDO_GEOR.mosaic in chapter 4 of the GeoRaster manual.
To make sure you can move forward, one more question:
are those images rectified and projected into the same projection?
If so, you should be able to do the mosaic without problem.
I would recommend you divide and conquer, i.e., split the whole mosaic into several smaller mosaics (sub-areas, such as northeastern area, northwestern area, etc.) first, mosaick them separately, then mosaick these smaller mosaics into the big one as you desire.
Please note that, for the missing tiles, you will have to make-up them. But it's relatively easy:
1. call sdo_geor.createBlank with a single cell value such as zero and proper image dimentions sizes. (those blank georaster objects will not store the pixels in RDT and so will not consume space. For the definition of BLANK GeoRaster object please read chapter one of the GeoRaster manual)
2. georeference each of the blank objects properly so that they are aligned/co-located with your images correctly. (this is the place where you need much time and shall be very careful so that the blank images are georeferenced correctly and meet the requirements of sdo_geor.mosaic)
Simply for mosaic process, you have an alternative. you actually don't have to geo-spatially georeference each image by leveraging the ULT coordinate feature of GeoRaster. On other words, remove georeferencing info first, then call setULTCoordinate to reset all ULT coordinates of the images so that they are spatially properly located in the GeoRaster cell space. Then do mosaic. After mosaick, you re-georeference the mosaic image by calling sdo_geor.georeference.
Let us know if you have any problem. This project is very interesting and shall be doable.
Regards,
Jeffrey Xie

Restriction for table maintainence

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for