Route partition on phone line

Hello,
We have cucm version 8 what is the reason for the option route partition under line. The reason I ask this if I have no css for line and device but I have assing a partition under router partition under line nothing happens cannot call no where until i assing a css under line or device. So what the point for route partition.  Even if I assign the same partition under route partition to another dn partition I cannot dial that dn in the same partition.  I feel the route partition is useless or is it?
Thanks,

Jaime is spot on (+5 J.). It would be a really good idea if you would take a couple of hours to go through the SRND. It is kinda heavy so you may need to iterate through it a couple of times. In regards to Route Partitions (Partitions) and Calling Search Spaces (CSS) try to think of a partition as a collection of patterns and a CSS as a collection of partitions.
The partition of "<none>" is special. It basically says that this pattern (whatever the pattern is: Directory Number, Translation, Route Pattern, etc.) is part of every CSS. Think of "<none>" as default for the time being. 
The CSS of "<none>" is exactly what it says "none". As in there is no CSS. As in the only partition in the collection the "<none>" or default partition. This is why you can put a phone number on two phones, not assign a partition or CSS, and make calls. This is not a proper design, even if the calls work. 
When you put your Directory Number (DN) in a partition (e.g. MyPhones_PT) you have removed the pattern from the <none> partition. Since the <none> CSS does not visibility of MyPhones_PT, you can't call the phone. This is operating as expected. 
There are other rules around patterns/partitions/CSS relationships. No sense in digging into that here. However, this relationship is far from useless. It is core to the whole digit analysis process. 
HTH
-Bill (@ucguerrilla)

Similar Messages

  • Noise from router on phone line

    I just got my DSL from Verizon activated today, the router connects fine, and I have my DSL filters in place, but I am getting this 'snow' sort of noise on the phone line when my router is turned on.
    Also, when you turn the router on when listening to the phone, you hear some beeping electronic sounds when the router is trying to connect.

    What you're hearing as far as the Electronic Noises on the line is normal for many lines (like little beeping sounds), but they should only be pretty faint even on the loudest of Corded phones. That should only happen during synchronization. The additional chatter or noise you hear on the line once the modem has trained should not be present, so you may either require an additional filter on each affected phone (Some devices such as Call Switches do require them) or there may be a degraded cable somewhere presenting the higher frequency noise as a tone closer to what can be heard over the phone, or Transmit Powers could be rather high.
    Some older lines in my area that have started to wear out exhibit white noise or electronic noise on the cabling just by nature. Newer cabling such as the ones I go through don't exhibit the white noise while DSL is running. if the noise is irritating and can be heard on the other end of the call as well, I'd certainly:
    Check other phones
    Check Filters
    Try adding further filters
    Analyze home wiring for any corrosion, lose connections, and dirty jacks.
    Consider testing both phone and modem at your NID to see if this shows a lessened effect of what you're hearing. A line splitter will be needed for this as well as a corded phone.
    Perhaps have Verizon run an MLT Test on your line to see if they can spot any highly resistive shorts through the test itself. (If found, tech gets dispatched to find it and fix it).
    Consider a Home Run.
    I have seen some very isolated issues where another type of DSL filter is needed, mainly on ADSL2+ lines. Might also be something to consider, getting a home run installed for your modem.
    ========
    The first to bring me 1Gbps Fiber for $30/m wins!

  • New Wireless Router Shut Down the Phone Line

    Just to clarify, I'm not the homeowner or the billpayer at the address that this post concerns. The home and phone belong to a relative who isn't particularly experienced in this sort of thing. She relative is away for the next two weeks, and I promised to try and figure out what was the problem.
    A landline fault notice has been filed with BT, but I've been informed that they might not be able to make it out here until this coming Wednesday, so it would be convenient if I could troubleshoot it from my end and safe the technicians a trip.
    My information on the issue is limited, having only briefly spoken with the relative about it. As I understand it, she upgraded her wireless broadband with Orange in order to attain speeds of 14MB and to have an unlimited data allowance. Upon recieving the new wireless router, she removed the previous one and correctly wired in the new one. Immediately after this, the landline and internet ceased to work. I've spent the last hour poking around and trying different phone ports in the house to no avail. The phones all say 'Check Phone Line'.
    This is all extremely puzzling. I have no idea why plugging in a new router would cause the phone line to shut down. Does anyone have any insight into what might have caused this?

    Flytch wrote:
    I just went up to the 'main box' in the attic and plugged in an older phone. The line was still dead, which I guess means that whatever happened when the modem was plugged in happened outside the buildings.
    Did you unplug the modem when you did the test in the main box?
    There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
    BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

  • How difficult can it be to get a phone line instal...

    First of all, for a communications company, BT are shockingly bad at communicating with their customers!
    We ordered a home move for our phone line and Infinity services back at the start of Dec, and had an activation date of 19th Dec. The engineer duly turned up on that date and set about the install. The single socket in our house was not where we wanted it (no power socket close by for the broadband router), but he would see about moving that and all was good so far.
    However, the engineer was struggling to get a tone on the line and after much to-ing and fro-ing and calling another engineer who was nearby, decided that the actual wires to the house were damaged somewhere between 30m and 250m from the house and as he was not qualified to do any underground works, he was going to pass the job onto another engineer. The next engineer duly came next day (on a Saturday no less!) to get us up and running. No dice. The engineer could not find the break, and we would have to get a new cable put in. 
    Now, apparently when our house was built the telephone cable was not put in with any ducting and ended up being concreted into the wall! So we would have to get new ducting and the works installed. He then went to paint up the pavement where it needed to be dug up to put the ducting in etc. Except the pavement was covered in leaves, so he sprayed the leaves. Hey ho - I knew where he had painted and I would be able to direct the guys if necessary. As the was the Saturday before Xmas, he was doubtful if the contractors would be before the New Year. The engineer did however get the broadband connection available. 
    Roll on the New Year and it's a stoney silence from BT, until the morning of the 13th Jan, when a contractor appearred at the door to say he was here to put in the ducting. I pointed out where it was going and left them to it. I glanced out of the window after a while to see they had made a 2ft gap in the hedge at the wrong side of the garden! I also watch in disbelief as one of the guys loaded his wheel barrow with spoil and wheeled it into the woods across the road and dumped it. These guys were the "dig things up" gang, another team were the "filling in" team and they would be along shortly to fill in the hole and re-lay the tarmac on the pavement. However, we at least now have the ducting from the street the house with a rope in the duct to allow a cable to be pulled through. Progress of a fashion.
    A few days later, the hole was filled in and the pavement tarred. It then took a full week before another engineer turned up to actually pull the wire through the ducting and connect us up. Except he couldn't because the rope was jammed. So he passed the job back to somebody else. Then 2 days later engineers 5 and 6 turned up with a rodding wire to free off the rope. They couldn't free it off. They did work out that the ducting was probably dislodged by the "filling in the hole" team, thus trapping the rope. This would need the pavement dug up again to reset the ducting. Oh joy.
    So, imagine my surprise when another engineer turns up one morning to install our line to discover he couldn't pull the rope through, then another engineer turns up in the afternoon to do the same , followed by yet another engineer the next day! 
    Meantime, the only communication from BT on the whole matter is when we call them to be told it is all in hand and it will be completed "in 2 days time", or we receive a text message saying they tried to call (no missed calls), and would try to call again in 3 days, do not call them back.
    So far in this saga we have had 13 people at the house, not getting us a phone line, in nearly 8 weeks and absolutely terrible communication from BT.
    A call to BT at the end of last week resulted in a promise that we would be fully installed by yesterday at 8pm.
    I called BT this morning to be told that the external works will be completed by this Friday and they would then call me back to arrange an appointment for the engineer to come and do the install next week!
    The only saving grace is we do have an internet connection (pretty vital for me as I work from home!) although I do have an extension cable running across my hallway and we have not been getting charged for line rental for the past 2 months.
    I was told today that we should be getting compensation, but to be honest I am not bothered about that - I JUST WANT A PHONE LINE INSTALLED!
    Rant over (for now!)

    Hi smert, 
    I am sorry about the delay in getting your phone line on. It definitely sounds like you have been going through the mill lately with all the work being done and still no phone line. 
    Please send me in your details using the "Contact The Mods" link found in my profile and we will take it from here. 
    Cheers,
    OlgaC 
    BTCare Community Mod
    If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
    We are sorry that we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Moving a BT Infinity phone line

    I have a Home Hub 5 with a BT Infinity line and the line enters the house on the ground floor at the main socket, where the router is currently located. Having just had building work done I want to move the socket upstairs but am not sure if the Home Hub will work off an extension lead from the main socket or whether some additional wiring is needed. Do BT still come out and move phone lines or is this a job that our electrician can do?

    Hi nrt,
    Welcome to the forum and thanks for posting,  you'll need a data extension fitted as normal extension wiring can no carry the faster speeds.  Check out BT Infinity Data Extension Kit and let me know if you want to organise this through BT.
    Cheers
    Neil
    BTCare Community Mod
    If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
    We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • 14 weeks to get a phone line installed - £10 compe...

    I moved house on 28/07 and after a huge amount of problems with Orange and after managing to cancel my account with them I ordered BT Broadband and Evening & Weekend Calls on 07/08/12.
    I get 3 emails confirming my order, thanking me for choosing paperless billing etc.
    My initial engineer appointment was on 14/09/12 which is 5 weeks and a long time. To quote BT: “It usually takes 15 working days from when you order. It can take longer but this is very rare.” (http://bt.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/8317/~/how-long-will-it-take-to-install-a-new-line%3F)
    I get a text and an email on 12/07 to remind me of my appointment between 1pm and 6pm. So far so good.
    The router gets delivered at 12.30am. This is promising.
    The engineer comes at 13.30pm, installs the BT Open Reach box in my flat and then asks me if I can open the electronic gate next door as he needs access to my neighbour’s pathway to activate the distribution point. I tell him I cannot as it’s not my building. We try the trades button on the door system. It doesn’t work. We try pressing random house numbers on the door system (there’s no flat numbers on the building) to see if someone’s home. Nothing works. I phone my landlord who tells me this is a council building. No one is coming in and out of the building/gate. After about 30 minutes of trying and waiting I tell him just to use his ladder and climb over the gate (it’s about 6 foot) and activate the distribution point. I’ll take the blame if someone complains. It shouldn’t be a problem as I live next door, I’ve got a BT Open Reach engineer with me and we have a perfectly valid reason to do it. He tells me he can’t do that because of health and safety riles and trespassing laws. Fair enough.
    The engineer leaves but before he does he tells me that when I’ve got access to the pathway BT would be able to send an engineer within 24 hours to activate the distribution point. He also tells me there is no need for me to be there the next time as all the work inside is completed and the only thing that needs to happen is for someone to activate the distribution point which is located on a wall on my neighbours building accessible from the pathway. He points it out to me and there is indeed a black box on the wall which can be reached using a ladder in the pathway.
    I phone BT to see if anyone can find out how to get access to the pathway as I assume that if BT has installed a distribution point there they must have a way for them to get access to it. Especially as the engineer told me there are 3 lines in my building so this must have happened before. I was wrong. I have to argue with the customer service person with a very poor command of the English language for 30 minutes. He doesn’t know what “the council” is and doesn’t understand whatsoever why I –and I quote- “Can’t just ask the neighbour to let the engineer in when the next appointment has been made”. I try to explain to him there is an electronic metal gate with a call system and I am unable to call anyone as there are no flat numbers on the outside of the building and asked if he was suggesting that I wait all evening after work until someone comes out and that even then, surely I can’t ask my neighbour to stay home to let a BT engineer onto his pathway because I am trying to get a phone line installed. He then presented me with another option: “We can install a new line from the road but this is chargeable by £350”. After 30 minutes of this and asking to speak to a manager several times –which was refused- I had enough and hung up.
    Determined to get the problem resolved I rang again and got someone else on the phone. She was quite sympathetic and advised me to phone the council and see if they can help. She confirmed that I didn’t need to be there for the next appointment if someone could give the engineer access to the distribution point as all the work apart from the distribution point activation was complete. By this time it was 4pm on a Friday and she promised to call back at 4pm on Monday.
    I called the council right away but they said the caretakers had gone home as it was late on a Friday and advised me to ring back on Monday.
    I get a text from BT: sorry we missed you appointment etc.
    BT calls me on Monday morning 10.30am asking if I’ve sorted it. I tell the person I was expecting a call from them at 4pm and therefore I hadn’t rang the council yet. He promises to ring me back on Wednesday at 10.30am.
    I call the council later that day; they’re not very helpful and advise me to call them again on Tuesday.
    On Tuesday they log the call and lo and behold. Wednesday at 8.30am, the caretaker calls me, gives me his mobile number, tells me the trades button on the call system will work before 9.30am and they can give them access remotely. If they’re coming after 9.30am, the engineer needs to ring him an hour in advance and he’ll come to open the gate. We’re getting somewhere.
    I don’t get a call on Wednesday 10.30am.
    I call them myself that afternoon and explain the above. The guy says he’s written it all down, everything will get sorted and I’ll get a text with the new time and date.
    Someone with a very poor command of the English language phones me on Thursday. I asked why she is ringing me. She says it’s to makes an engineer appointment. I tell her she doesn’t need to ring me as I don’t need to be in the property and they should all the information needed as I called them the day before. She doesn’t have a clue what I’m on about. I tell her to read out what she has on her screen under the notes as I now don’t trust that the person the day before has written it down properly. She once again doesn’t have a clue what I’m on about. I ask to speak to her manager. She says he’ll call me back. 5 minutes later he does. His English is excellent and he seems to have found the notes and knows exactly what’s going on. This is encouraging. He says the first appointment they have is 03/10 (it is now 20/09) but he’ll make sure they get it earlier and he’ll ring me back. The first person that hardly speaks English calls back. She says the appointment will be on 03/10 between 8am and 1pm. I tell her that her manager told me he was going to make sure it was going to be earlier and ask her why he lied to me. She doesn’t understand what I’m saying. I try to explain to her that trades button on the call system will work before 9.30am and they can give them access remotely but if they’re coming after 9.30am, the engineer needs to ring him an hour in advance and he’ll come to open the gate. She doesn’t understand what I’m saying. I ask her to get her manager to ring me back as he speaks English. She says he’ll call within 15 minutes. I get a text 5 minutes later confirming my appointment for 03/10 between 8am and 1pm.
    On 02/10 I phone the caretaker in the morning to let him know they’re coming on 03/10 between 8am and 1pm. I also called BT once again to check everything was clear, confirming they have the correct mobile number of the caretaker etc. They say they have all the information needed and promise that the work will be done.
    I phone on the afternoon of the 3rd to check the work had been done and I am told that it hasn’t as the engineer needs access to a flat roof and the caretaker can’t provide him with that. I explain that the original engineer had been on the flat roof already and told me they only needed to get through the gate to activate the distribution point so I don’t understand why they now need to get back on the roof. The roof can be accessed with a ladder (which they all standard have with them) from the pavement anyway so why do I need to be there? They tell me that the engineer has tried to call me but my phone was switched off. I am 100% sure that my phone has been on all day and I haven’t received any missed calls. Also, after all of the above, I wouldn’t switch my phone off on the crucial day. The engineer is lying. After being on the line for 15 minutes (as it takes at least 5 minutes to go through the automated menu every single time you call them and it literally takes a minute for the information to come up on their screen every time they need to access a file) that I don’t have time to discuss this right now as I have an important teleconference with an overseas client and ask for someone to call me back that evening to discuss this as I am busy at work all day.
    I receive a text 10 minutes later saying the next engineer appointment is 12/11 between 1pm and 6pm.
    This is 14 (!!!) weeks after ordering the service. I phone back when I have a short break at work to discuss this and request a call back. Someone calls me back 5 minutes later and asked for my account information which I don’t have handy so I ask to hold on while I’m looking it up. She hangs up on me.
    I stay late at work to write an email on the email form on the website with a watered down version of all of the above and I get a confirmation email that it’s arrived.
    I get another text that evening at 8.40pm as well as an email saying -once again-  that the next engineer appointment is 12/11 between 1pm and 6pm.
    Someone calls me at 8.50pm saying that the next engineer appointment is 12/11. I tell him I know this as they’ve sent me 2 texts and an email already and that this date is unacceptable and ask to speak to his manager. He tells me I need to call the Order Management Department. I ask him what the number is. You’ve guessed it: 0800 0800 150.
    Someone called Chris XXXXX calls me the morning after to discuss the email I’ve written the day before. He gives me the usual “Open Reach controls the engineers” story and tells me the appointment will not be earlier than 12/11. I tell him this is unacceptable and if the appointment can’t be moved forward I want some compensation for all the expense and inconvenience caused. He tells me that since I haven’t been billed yet I’m not eligible for any compensation but as a gesture of good will he will give me £10 which I’m normally not eligible  for as this is only given to people whose engineer didn’t come on time. I try to explain that if the engineer would have called me as he said he’s done (and not lied like he’s done) I could have explained where the distribution point was and I probably even would have rushed home from work to finally get it sorted. We argue a bit about compensation in which he tells me he’s already doing me a favour by giving me £10. I stop the argument to discuss more practical issues and ask him if I now need to be home on 12/11. He says I do. I now need to take another day off work it seems. I ask him if the caretaker needs to be there as well. He says he does. I ask him if I should invite anyone else and provide tea and biscuits for everyone. I don’t think he gets the joke. We argue a bit more about compensation, we get nowhere. I’m now getting upset. He says he’ll call me back at 1.30pm.
    He does and immediately I ask him for his direct phone number. He says he doesn’t have one. I ask him for his email address. He says he doesn’t have one. I ask how to get in touch with him. He says through the 0800 call centre or the form on the website. Now the line gets really bad and gets disconnected. There is nothing wrong with my mobile or signal, I have 5 bars and 3G showing but I can’t hear him and the line gets disconnected. This happens 2 more times. I get him back on the phone and I ask him to call me back on my work landline. He does and a number shows up on the phone (not the 0800 one that showed up when he called my mobile). I immediately write it down and tell him he just lied to me about not having a direct line. He says it’s a desk used by many people. I tell him that if I ring that number and he’s around there’s chance I could get to speak to him surely. He says it’s only used for outgoing calls. I haven’t tried to ring it and can’t be bothered to be honest. I stop this argument and bring the conversation back to compensation. I ask if he can at least give me a few extra months free or upgrade my account for free for a few months maybe by throwing in some telly or something. He says he can’t do that and they can review compensation once the line has been installed. I tell him that’s not good enough and that this whole story is going online and hang up.
    Worst customer service I’ve ever experienced and it seems that I’m stuck with it because I’ve already got an appointment and cancelling and going with another provider will result in an even longer wait.
    I’ve been offered £10 compensation for taking 2 days of work, hours on the phone, massive mobile phone bills, a lot of stress and 14 weeks without a landline or internet. Truly unbelievable.

    Hi
    I am sorry to see you are having problems with your BT Service
    I suggest you contact the forum mods they should be able to get this problem sorted for you this is a link to them http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951
    They normally reply by email or phone directly to you within 3 working days they will take personal ownership of your problem until resolved and will keep you informed of progress
    They are a UK based BT specialist team who have a good record at getting problems solved
    This is a customer to customer self help forum the only BT presence here are the forum moderators
    If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

  • New phone line and broadband, massive noise margin...

    Hi, being a long time DSL stalwart a recent move to a new property has meant I've needed to switch over to ADSL instead and thus far it's proving to be a bit of a mare!
    I waited a month for the initial installation engineer who promptly never showed anyway, no bother I thought, the hub turned up and I installed it myself and it promptly didn't work   It soon became pretty apparent that the phone line was completely dead even from the test socket.  A few phone calls later and the phone line is working much to my delight.  The broadband is another story though, initially it still couldn't connect but later in the day it managed to get going.  However it's excruciatingly slow with an average of 20 to 30kps throughput and substantial packetloss.  Also worth noting is that in this new property, only the master socket actually works, this place has 4 other sockets dotted around all of which appear to be dead, could these be part of the issue?  Does using the test socket completely cut these out and rule out bad wiring?  Just to add, at 13 hours connected the adsl status is pretty much the same and I couldn't notice anything on the BT line noise test number.
    I'm not familar with the workings on ADSL lines but I'm guessing the root of the problem is down to a wildly varying noise margin both up and down.  Down fluctuates between ~2 and 20 within a matter of seconds and up gives some numbers that defy belief.  Now the line was originally activated on Wednesday, actually kicked into life sometime on Friday and the router has been connected for 13 hours now, whilst it's still early days and things should bed in more, I assume I'm right in thinking I should be alarmed at how bad a line I'm starting out with?  And should I be directing my ire at the builders or BT?
    Any help and suggestions will be hugely appreciated!
    Cheers!
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    as it is a newbuild is the master socket inside your home or outside like this 
    connecting to the test socket will eliminate all your extension sockets and should be your best connection.  if you are not in the test socket could you try it and post new stats please
    with your attenuation I would expect a connection speed of about 18mb when you get this fiixed
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Crackling phone line and broadband disconnecting

    I'll try and keep this short as i have no intention of wasting another 4 hours of my life trying to explain how disappointed i've been with my BT Infinity broadband.
    I have recently come to the end of my 18 month contract so was looking for a new provider. I have been getting speeds of 10MB for a while, when i should be getting much higher download speeds. My phone line has always crackled badly and whenever i use the home phone the router resets itself.
    I made the decision that if BT could rectify any problem with my speeds i would stay with them. I have basically been told that the problem is in my house. There is no problem whatsoever with my phone line so any engineer visit would cost me a fortune. 
    After using the BT line test/speed test it tells me that the speeds between my home and the phone exchange (0.7 miles away) is just under 10Mbps. Does this mean that there isn't anything wrong with the internal set up of my broadband and if so why did none of the several people i spoke come to this conclusion? I've been paying for the 76Mbps service for 18 Months and not one person at BT has ever offered a solution just the same scripted rubbish that it is me that had the problem. Not only have i spent a fortune on the broadband itself, i also bought new phones on the recommendation of another BT "expert".
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I use the home hub 4. Yes it does have a filter on it and then the phone plugs into that. Tried test socket this morning and still getting crackling on the line. 
    Exchange IRLAM is served by Cabinet 8
    Featured ProductsDownstream Line Rate(Mbps)Upstream Line Rate(Mbps)Downstream Range(Mbps)Availability Date  High Low High Low    
    FTTC Range A (Clean)
    51.6
    35.6
    12.4
    7.7
    Available
    FTTC Range B (Impacted)
    43.9
    25
    12.4
    6.1
    Available
    WBC ADSL 2+
    Up to 18
    15.5 to 20
    Available
    WBC ADSL 2+ Annex M
    Up to 18
    Up to 1
    15.5 to 20
    Available
    ADSL Max
    Up to 7
    6 to 8
    Available
    WBC Fixed Rate
    2
    Available
    Fixed Rate
    2
    Available
    Other Offerings
    FTTP on Demand
    330
    30
    Available
    Fibre Multicast
    Available
    Copper Multicast
    Available

  • Error while creating router partition in 11.2

    Hi,
    I get the following error while running sdo_router_partition.partition_router. Please help in solving this.
    Error starting at line 12 in command:
    BEGIN
    sdo_router_partition.partition_router;
    END;
    Error report:
    ORA-20000: Oracle Router partitioning failed
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_ROUTER_PARTITION", line 1321
    ORA-06512: at line 2
    20000. 00000 - "%s"
    *Cause:    The stored procedure 'raise_application_error'
    was called which causes this error to be generated.
    *Action:   Correct the problem as described in the error message or contact
    the application administrator or DBA for more information.

    You might want to tune PKG_CLIENT_LOWSPEED_TIMEOUT before running "zoneadm install"
    For example:
    # export PKG_CLIENT_LOWSPEED_TIMEOUT=300

  • Setting up a wireless network in a building with no wired phone lines

    I am trying to set up a small wireless network in an apartment block that has no phone lines coming into.
    What , if any, wireless router / access points / bridges can be used. ?
    So it is Wireless In and Wireless Out to broadcast to pc /  notebook users in apartments.
    if so what performance can be expected?

    it is a 10 storey building about 60 meters wide. it is basically 4 rows of apartments with 2 hallways and a 2 meter atrium in the centre. eg
     outside wall | apartment | hallway | apartment| atrium gap| ditto otherside
    there are no airshafts and the walls are all 2 feet thick solid concrete reinforced with steel.
    i have the option to use more than one apartment as base

  • Cisco 877 router - Cisco IP phone won't register with SIP provider

    Hi all,
    I'm having a problem with a Cisco SPA504G phone not registering with the SIP carrier over the Internet. We've recently rolled out a Cisco 877 router onto a new NBN business connection and can't get the pre-configured IP phone to register.
    When we tested the phone with the NBN-provided Netgear router, it worked fine, as it did with the previous Cisco 1841 router we were using on a different link.
    The way it's setup is using VLANs to define the internal subnets, which are then assigned to the physical interfaces (since the 887 doesn't allow IP assignments to the interfaces directly).
    VLAN 100 is the internal network and has a SBS2011 server – assigned to F0 – IP range is 192.168.1.0
    VLAN 200 is the guest network and has Internet access only – assigned to F1 – IP range is 10.1.1.0
    VLAN 500 is the WAN network and connects to the NBN upstream box – assigned to F3 – external IP address assigned by DHCP
    I've been playing around with access lists, nat rules, basically everything in my limited Cisco knowledge to try and figure this out, but to no avail. I have even configured what I believe is unrestricted access to IP, UDP and TCP outbound and inbound to all VLANs and still can't get it to register.
    Tried isolating the issue by creating a new VLAN and assigning it to the spare interface and basically allowing everything in and out, but still no luck.
    The problem has to be something on the router – probably some small line of config I haven’t removed or added.
    I am going to pull my hair out soon, so would really appreciate some assistance from the Cisco gurus out there.
    My client has just purchased about 10 of these handsets from their provider so I need to fix this ASAP. The guy who provided them wasn't very helpful, and basically said I'm on my own once we tested using the NBN-provided Netgear router.
    Happy to post my config as well.
    Please help!!!!

    Current configuration : 4912 bytes
    version 15.1
    no service pad
    service timestamps debug datetime msec
    service timestamps log datetime msec
    no service password-encryption
    hostname Router1
    boot-start-marker
    boot-end-marker
    no aaa new-model
    memory-size iomem 10
    crypto pki token default removal timeout 0
    no ip source-route
    ip dhcp excluded-address 10.1.1.1
    ip dhcp pool GUEST
     network 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
     dns-server 10.1.1.1 203.50.2.71 139.130.4.4
     default-router 10.1.1.1
    ip cef
    no ip domain lookup
    ip domain name network.local
    ip name-server 192.168.1.123
    ip name-server 203.23.53.12
    ip name-server 197.12.32.86
    ip name-server 8.8.8.8
    no ipv6 cef
    license udi pid CISCO887VA-K9 sn FGL171220XY
    username admin privilege 15 secret 5 $1$aNsm$N1BCQYkoi8gnURyvloYEX/
    controller VDSL 0
    interface Ethernet0
     no ip address
     shutdown
    interface ATM0
     no ip address
     no atm ilmi-keepalive
     bridge-group 10
     pvc 8/35
    interface FastEthernet0
     description NAC - Internal network
     switchport access vlan 100
     no ip address
    interface FastEthernet1
     description NAC - Guest network
     switchport access vlan 200
     no ip address
    interface FastEthernet2
     no ip address
     shutdown
    interface FastEthernet3
     description **** WAN Port ****
     switchport access vlan 500
     no ip address
    interface Vlan1
     no ip address
     bridge-group 10
     hold-queue 100 out
    interface Vlan100
     description NAC - Internal Vlan
     ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
     ip access-group IN-100 in
     ip access-group OUT-100 out
     ip nat inside
     ip virtual-reassembly in
    interface Vlan200
     description NAC - Guest Vlan
     ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
     ip access-group IN-200 in
     ip access-group OUT-200 out
     ip nat inside
     ip virtual-reassembly in
    interface Vlan500
     description **** WAN Vlan ****
     ip address dhcp
     ip nat outside
     no ip virtual-reassembly in
    no ip forward-protocol nd
    ip http server
    ip http access-class 23
    ip http secure-server
    ip dns server
    ip nat inside source list NAT-100 interface Vlan500 overload
    ip nat inside source list NAT-200 interface Vlan500 overload
    ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.123 25 interface Vlan500 25
    ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.123 443 interface Vlan500 443
    ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.123 3389 interface Vlan500 3399
    ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.123 80 interface Vlan500 80
    ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.123 4125 interface Vlan500 4125
    ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.124 3389 interface Vlan500 3390
    ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.123 987 interface Vlan500 987
    ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.123 1723 interface Vlan500 1723
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 55.234.52.43
    ip access-list extended IN-100
     permit udp any any range bootps bootpc
     deny   ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
     permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
    ip access-list extended IN-200
     permit udp any any range bootps bootpc
     permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
    ip access-list extended NAT-100
     deny   ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
     permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
    ip access-list extended NAT-200
     deny   ip 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
     permit ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
    ip access-list extended OUT-100
     permit udp any range bootps bootpc any
     deny   ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
     permit ip any 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
    ip access-list extended OUT-200
     permit udp any range bootps bootpc any
     deny   ip 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
     permit ip any 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 23 permit 59.23.164.52
    access-list 23 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 23 permit 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 23 permit 120.146.0.0 0.0.255.255
    access-list 23 permit 149.185.12.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 23 permit 110.44.28.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 23 permit 110.44.26.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 23 permit 103.25.212.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 23 permit any
    bridge 10 protocol ieee
    banner motd ^C
    *      Authorized personnel only!       *
    ^C
    line con 0
     login local
     no modem enable
    line aux 0
    line vty 0 4
     password password01
     login local
     transport input all
    end

  • Setting up fax and voicemail on same phone line.

    I have one phone line with voicemail and fax.  How do I set up the fax so voicemail doesn't pick up my faxes and the fax doesn't pick up my voicemail messages?  I have the fax and phone going through a splitter.  I just discontinued my separate phone line I used for faxing and internet and want to use a single phone line for everything.  Thanks in advance for any suggestions.  Auntalee

    If you have Verizon Home Voicemail (the kind you access by dialing a phone number i.e. no answering machine) I can't see how it would work. 
    Some fax machines can answer the phone listen for the fax tones and if it doesn't hear them it rings another phone or answering machine connected to it.
    It comes down to something has to answer the phone, figure out what kind of call it is a route it to either a answering machine or a fax machine.
    The only other way to do it with one line and Verizon voice mail is to get something called Distinctive Ringing service (if its available for Fios).  You get another phone number but not another physical line.  The one phone line rings differently for each number.  The fax machine must then have the distinctive ring feature and be setup to only answer it's ring.  The other ring it ignores which means VM will pick it up.
    Good luck

  • ADSL problems - Slow - Noise on phone line

    Hi, Im hoping someone can help me with Broadband issues I've been having. Ill try and describe the salient points without turning into a rant. Suffice to say Ive had a torrid time over 2 weeks, spending hours on the phone to maybe 15+ different call centre staff and relaying information back and forth between them and 3 different engineers.
    Ive recently moved house and about a month before the move I arranged for an 8Mb ADSL connection to be ready for me when we moved in. I was assured that I would definitely have service on this date which was important to me as I am a self employed web designer and rely on an internet connection for my work.
    We moved on 11th this month, I plugged the router in and it couldn't connect (orange/purple flashing light on HomeHub 3). After talking to various people at the BT Broadband call centre over a period of a few days, going through basic troubleshooting numerous times it was eventually decided that an engineer be sent. He found the problem relatively quickly, the exchange hadn't been set up for my connection. He set up the connection at the exchange and left with me being able to connect.
    I quickly realised that the speeds were very slow (around 0.7Mbps). I left it for 24hrs but no improvement. It also worried me was that I could hear noise on the phone line. The noise is only there when the broad band is connected, a steady fuzzy static. You can also hear the modem on the router dial occasionally like the old school dial up connections. I again phoned the call centre, again went through basic trouble shooting (plugging directly into test socket, different filters, connect computer into router via cable and not wifi etc etc….), and again eventually got another engineer sent.
    The new engineer changed my Home Hub 3 for a Home Hub 4, decided nothing else could be wrong at the house end so went to the exchange. He phoned from the exchange explaining that he had sorted the problem (I can’t remember what he said he did as it was beyond my understanding). I was suspicious that the situation hadn’t been resolved though because I still had noise on the line and 24 hrs later I also had my connection drop to 0.13Mbps.
    More phoning to call centre folk and eventually engineer no.3 was sent. I have to say he seemed very thorough, changed the master socket (which he told me the previous 2 engineers should have done) and spent a long time doing various tests. It seemed the problem was fixed since after changing the socket there was no noise on the line. The connection eventually recovered after an SNR and IP profile reset to about 2.5Mbps.
    The next day though there was again noise on the line. Some crackles at first but later turning into the constant fuzzy noise that I was hearing before. The speed steadily deteriorated everytime the router was re-synching during training and is now 0.97Mbs and I guess on its way down further since the noise is now quite loud. The engineer was kind enough to ring back to check up on the case and when he heard the issue he insisted that it was almost certainly a phone line fault and that I should call 151 to arrange for someone to come out.
    Ive spent today being passed to and fro between the phone line department and the broadband department. The broadband department also tell me they think the phone line department should deal with the issue but then the phone line department say there is no problem when they do a remote test so pass me back to the Broadband department. Eventually after speaking to 5 different people today it has been decided that I should have my 4th Broadband Engineer visit me on Monday.
    To my limited knowledge and reading on these forums it seems the issue is likely to be a line fault, so it’s frustrating that it’s possible the wrong person might be being sent and the problem will continue.
    Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated, as I mention the connection is very important to me.
    ADSL Line stats from my Home Hub 4:
    Connected Connection time: 0 days, 03:00:05
    Downstream: 1.313 Mbps
    Upstream: 448 Kbps
    BTWholesale Speedtest:
    Download speed achieved during the test was - 0.96 Mbps
    For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 0.2 Mbps-1 Mbps.
    Additional Information:
    Your DSL Connection Rate :1.34 Mbps(DOWN-STREAM), 0.45 Mbps(UP-STREAM)
    IP Profile for your line is - 1 Mbps

    Obviously you need to get rid of the line noise problem before your internet connection will improve. Normally the advice is to phone 151 and report a phone fault with no mention of broadband. You really now need to wait until monday to see if this engineer visit solves your noise problem
    if after the engineer visit there is no improvement then the mods may be able to help
    as this is a residential line and is not supposed to be used for business purposes maybe you should consider a business line which gives a better service contract especially as you are self employed
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Broadband drops out & noisy phone lines.

    Hi,
    Not sure whether this needs to be posted here or in the phone section as both areas are effected. 
    My property is pretty old and the internal phone sockets/wiring is also quite dated. I've always had issues with my phone lines being very noisy to the point where i have simply done away with having a house phone (not ideal). 
    I use my internet for many hours every day - its an essential part of my life and income. I had a new internal socket fitted about 2 or 3 years back exclusively for my internet use to help improve the connection which had been fine until recently. 
    I had new windows fitted which required the socket to be moved & ever since then my connection has been unreliable and drops out.
    Ive reported the fault on the line earlier today and am waiting to hear back off BT but thought i'd post here in the mean time. 
    I use a Belkin router and have spoken to them but they were unable to help. After running a few tests they said it was most likel a phone line fault. I have also tried a different router and experienced exactly the same issues. 
    How do i go about identifying the fault & getting it fixed? With it likely being an internal fault, is it likely to cost me money? What are the terms & conditions with this type of problem?
    Also, how would i go about getting new sockets installed in my house so i could get a working house phone? How much is this likely to cost?
    Thanks for any advice. 

    was the new socket you had fitted like this    if so any extension sockets in your home should be connected to the back of the bottom half of the socket NTE5.  It may be that moving the socket has moved some of the wires and they are loose.
    BT are responsible for the wiring up to the first socket in your where the cable comes in from outside.  if the problem is found to be your internal wiring after the master socket then you will be charged at least £130
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Re: (forte-users) No response from Router partition

    Sounds like what we have been experiencing here, on Unix.
    According to Fort&eacute;, upgrading to 3M should resolve it. Unfortunately, we
    can't
    confirm it yet, as we are in the process of upgrading and testing.
    I believe this is documented as an "internal" Fort&eacute; bug report.
    Hope this hels.
    Daniel D&eacute;sy
    BORN
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Pabbaraju, Ramarao (EXP N-IONIDEA)" <ramarao.pabbarajulmco.com>
    To: "Forte-Users (E-mail)" <forte-userslists.xpedior.com>
    Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:46 AM
    Subject: (forte-users) No response from Router partition
    Hi All,
    One of the router partitions on NT server stops responding once in awhile. We can not get to it through escript or econsole and the only
    solution we have is to shutdown the ftexec using task manager and start
    the partition again. We don't see any error messages in the log except
    this line "LbRouter::AttachToRouter - Ignoring DOM version: -1 obj
    version: 0". Does anyone have any idea what this means? Is there any way
    to figure out the problem? We are using Forte 3L3. Thanks in advance.
    Thanks
    Ramarao--
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a
    new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

    My guess is, your third service object is not referenced.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Forte App [mailto:forteapphotmail.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 3:08 PM
    To: kamranaminyahoo.com
    Subject: (forte-users) Partition problem
    Hello Everyone,
    I have three (3) service objects in my project and when i went into
    partition workshop i can only see two service objects instead of three and
    all the three service objects properties settings are same
    iam using Forte 3.0L2.
    Thanks in Advance
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

Maybe you are looking for

  • Stock Ageing Report in BIW

    Hi Friends, We have a requirement to create stock ageing report in BIW. If i create the report based on the material documnet date which is coming in 0IC_C03 cube,i will get correct ageing as far as manufacturing plant is concerned. But we have defin

  • How do I backup a very large music library?

    I have about 3TB of music files on 2 external hard drives. A lot of this music is live recordings (obtained legally) which are not available commercially.  I feel like I am at risk with no backup solution, but I have not been able to find a suitable

  • Expression using Map access not working....

    I am attempting to use the ability to access a Map by key from a binding expression on the jsp. I have extended HashMap and overridden the get method in order to return a Boolean from the get(key) method. This works: rendered="#{bean.enabledFunctionS

  • Alt+# in fluxbox stopped working

    Problem is that i can't do alt+2 to get a @ or alt+8 to do a [ but i can do alt+tab and so on =/. now when i trie to do alt+2 instead it changes channel in xchat, or changes to the second tab in firefox. alt+# works fine in other wm's.

  • I could not see "Web Intelligence Document" option in the New Menu infoview

    Hi , I am new to the webi reports. i am trying to build a new webi report using universes. Through Guest login i logged into the info view. I can able to see the universes installed but i am not getting the option "Web Intelligence Document" in the N