SCM5 - SCM7 Upgrade Error during LiveCache upgrade Step C4

We are in the process of upgrading our SCM5 system to SCM7 release level. During livecache upgrade step C4 to load transaction data, we are getting error CONNE_IMPORT_WRONG_COMP_TYPE. The dump says that "when importing the object 'OT_ORDERS", the component no. 5 in the dataset has a different type from the corresponding component of the target object in the program "/SAPAPO/SAPLOM_UPGR_PARALLEL". The data type is "P" in the dataset, but "C in the program".
Our source livecache version is 7.6.03.12 and target livecache version we are upgrading to is 7.7.04.29. We used BS 7 SR1 liveCache 7.7.04 DVD from service marketplace. We did not use the update DVD since the guide mentioned that customers on SCM5.1 or higher need to run livecache upgrade from update DVD.
All steps in A, B have already been completed.
More details from the ST22 dump -
Error analysis | | An exception occurred that is explained in detail below. | | The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_IMPORT_MISMATCH_ERROR', was | | not caught in | | procedure "GET_DB" "(METHOD)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause. | | Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the | | exception would occur, the current program is terminated. | | The reason for the exception is: | | When importing the object "OT_ORDERS", the component no. 5 in the | | dataset has a different type from the corresponding component | | of the target object in the program "/SAPAPO/SAPLOM_UPGR_PARALLEL". | | | | The data type is "P" in the dataset, but "C" in the program. Information on where terminated | | Termination occurred in the ABAP program "/SAPAPO/SAPLOM_UPGR_PARALLEL" - in | | "GET_DB". | | The main program was "SAPMSSY1 ". | | | | In the source code you have the termination point in line 3222 | | of the (Include) program "/SAPAPO/OM_UPG_CLASS_IMPCLUT". | | The termination is caused because exception "CX_SY_IMPORT_MISMATCH_ERROR" | | occurred in | | procedure "GET_DB" "(METHOD)", but it was neither handled locally nor declared | | in the RAISING clause of its signature. | | | | The procedure is in program "/SAPAPO/SAPLOM_UPGR_PARALLEL "; its source code | | begins in line | | 3221 of the (Include program "/SAPAPO/OM_UPG_CLASS_IMPCLUT ".
We are running AIX5.3 and Oracle 10.2.0.2.0.
Any help here will be greatly appreciated.

This is exactly the same with OSS 305147 2010. It will be answered in BC-DB-LCA area.

Similar Messages

  • Error during MaxDB upgrade from 7.3.00.42 to 7.5.00.32

    Hello all,
    I am attempting to upgrade from MaxDB 7.3.00.42 to 7.5.00.32, as part of a migration from HP-UX 11.11 to Windows Server 2003.  The MaxDB database supports a Content Server 6.30 application, and from what I have found so far, I need to upgrade/patch to 7.5.00.51 on the HP-UX server, before I can migrate using the loadercli (as per note 962019).
    While performing the upgrade to 7.5.00.32 (following the steps in the Upgrade Guide to MaxDB 7.5), I receive the following error.
    chperm 660 sdb:sdba /sapdb/data/config/SDB.mmm
    user sdb can access /sapdb/data/config/SDB.mmm
    remove /sapdb/data/wrk/dbmsrv.prt
    remove /sapdb/data/wrk/SDB.knl
    remove /sapdb/data/wrk/SDB.mdf
    permissions for databases as of version 7.5.00 are used on your system
    database owner is sdb
    administrators group is sdba
    owner of SDB is sdb (sdba sdba)
    user_logon failed
    Obviously there is a permissions problem of some kind, but I have not been able to pinpoint where.  I allowed the DDUPDATE.SH script to create the user SDB, and it appears to have been created successfully and was used during the earlier steps of the upgrade script.
    While working with SAP support I confirmed that I could connect to the database using the SDB user and I also executed the sdbverify, which completed successfully.  As per the upgrade guide, I am logged in to HP-UX as root when running the upgrade (and when I ran sdbverify).
    If anyone has suggestions on the cause of this error, I would greatly appreciate any assistance.
    Best Regards,
    Rusty Robbins

    Isn't that how it always goes...
    I have been fighting this for 4-5 days, and had replied back and forth with support, with no luck on a resolution.  But of course just as soon as I post my question here, support comes back with the answer!.  I guess that just goes to show how good the SDN site is!  ;p
    Anyway, the answer to my problem was related to the group permissions on this HP-UX server. The ddupdate script did create the SDB user and set the primary group as SDBA, which normally would give the SDB user all rights for that group.  However, in this case the error continued to occur, until I explicitly added the user SDB to group SDBA (at the request of SAP support).  This upgrade step did finish successfully, and I am now continuing on with the other steps to migrate to Windows.  Hopefully the rest of the steps will go smoother...
    Regards,
    Rusty Robbins

  • JSPM upgrade Error during validation of the dependencies of the selected ho

    Hi,
    We have a strange problem, recently we have upgraded our server from XI 3.0 to PI 7.1 and after the upgrade
    as part of post upgrade steps I had to deploy few SDA/SCA files, while I am trying to deploy these files
    I am getting the error "Error during validation of the dependencies of the selected hot fixes" during the check queue phase and I am not able to go ahead..
    As I am facing the same error for three different kinds of SDA files, I was trying to apply SP03 for my
    JSPM version 7.11.0.0.119 but even here I am facing the same error.
    I am sure that what ever the files I am trying to deploy are correct because these are instructed by SAP.
    I guess I have some problem with my JSPM.
    Please help me.
    Thanking you in advance.
    Sonali

    Hi,
    There is no SDM in NW 7.1. All the deployments have to be carried out by JSPM itself.
    Sonali - Can you check the JSPM logs and give complete log ?
    Also can u mention the SDA file names ?
    Are they standard SAP SDA files or custom files ?
    Cheers......,
    Raghu

  • Error during the upgrade phase "start_shdi_first"

    Hello,
    We are having issue with upgrading r/3 4.7 enterprise extension set to ECC 6.0
    Here the error message goes....
    starting system failed rc=0
    to analyse the error during start of shadow instance
    view files 'Startsfi.log' and 'devtrace.log'
    in directory usr\..put
    repeat phase until shadow instance is started
    and u can logon instance no '01'"
    We have changed the DDIC password during upgrade.after that we ran the initphase to update the password.
    I think sapup is referring the old password which was entered initially during the upgrade and we dont remember the old password also.
    Appreciate your response
    Startsfi.log
    1 ETQ201XEntering upgrade-phase "START_SHDI_FIRST" ("20080218175653")
    2 ETQ366 Connect variables are set for shadow instance access
    4 ETQ399 System-nr = '01', GwService = 'sapgw01'
    4 ETQ399 Environment variables:
    4 ETQ399   dbs_mss_schema=de4
    4 ETQ399   auth_shadow_upgrade=1
    4 ETQ399 Set environment for shadow connect:
    4 ETQ399 ENV: dbs_mss_schema=de4
    4 ETQ399 ENV: auth_shadow_upgrade=1
    4 ETQ399 Set RFC variables for shadow connect:
    4 ETQ399 System-nr = '01', GwService = 'sapgw01'
    4 ETQ399 Set tool parameters for shadow connect:
    4 ETQ380 computing toolpath for request "TP_SHADOW_CONNECT"
    4 ETQ381 request "TP_SHADOW_CONNECT" means "tp needs to connect to shadow system"
    4 ETQ382 translates to group "R3UP_TOOL_GROUP_NEW"
    4 ETQ383 translates to path "exe"
    4 ETQ383 translates to path "exe"
    4 ETQ399   default TPPARAM: SHADOW.TPP
    4 ETQ380 computing toolpath for request "TP_ALWAYS_NEW"
    4 ETQ381 request "TP_ALWAYS_NEW" means "always tp from DIR_PUT/exe, for phase KX_SWITCH"
    4 ETQ382 translates to group "R3UP_TOOL_GROUP_NEW"
    4 ETQ383 translates to path "exe"
    4 ETQ383 translates to path "exe"
    2 ETQ399 Starting shadow instance
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    4 ETQ233 Calling function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    2EETQ235 Call of function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC failed (error-status "-3")
    4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
    2 ETQ353 Starting system
    2 ETQ370 starting test RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    4 ETQ233 Calling function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    2EETQ235 Call of function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC failed (error-status "-3")
    4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
    2WETQ372 test RFC failed, rc="-3"
    2 ETQ370 starting test RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    4 ETQ233 Calling function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    2EETQ235 Call of function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC failed (error-status "-3")
    4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
    2WETQ372 test RFC failed, rc="-3"
    2 ETQ370 starting test RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    4 ETQ233 Calling function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    2EETQ235 Call of function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC failed (error-status "-3")
    4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
    2WETQ372 test RFC failed, rc="-3"
    2 ETQ370 starting test RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    4 ETQ233 Calling function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    2EETQ235 Call of function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC failed (error-status "-3")
    4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
    2WETQ372 test RFC failed, rc="-3"
    2 ETQ370 starting test RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    4 ETQ233 Calling function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    2EETQ235 Call of function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC failed (error-status "-3")
    4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
    2WETQ372 test RFC failed, rc="-3"
    2 ETQ370 starting test RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    4 ETQ233 Calling function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    2EETQ235 Call of function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC failed (error-status "-3")
    4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
    2WETQ372 test RFC failed, rc="-3"
    2 ETQ370 starting test RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    4 ETQ233 Calling function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="DE4", Nr="01", GwHost="MTW02SDEC01", GwService="sapgw01"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    2EETQ235 Call of function module "UPG_IS_SHADOW_SYSTEM" by RFC failed (error-status "-3")
    4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
    2WETQ372 test RFC failed, rc="-3"
    2EETQ399 Starting shadow instance failed
    2EETQ399 Test RFC failed finally
    2EETQ399 Dialogue: ERROR
    2EETQ399 Starting system failed, rc=0
    DEVTRACE:
    trc file: "dev_disp", trc level: 1, release: "700"
    sysno      01
    sid        DE4
    systemid   560 (PC with Windows NT)
    relno      7000
    patchlevel 0
    patchno    111
    intno      20050900
    make:      multithreaded, ASCII, optimized
    pid        2272
    Mon Feb 18 16:08:40 2008
    kernel runs with dp version 229(ext=109) (@(#) DPLIB-INT-VERSION-229)
    length of sys_adm_ext is 364 bytes
    SWITCH TRC-HIDE on ***
    ***LOG Q00=> DpSapEnvInit, DPStart (01 2272) [dpxxdisp.c   1239]
         shared lib "dw_xml.dll" version 111 successfully loaded
         shared lib "dw_xtc.dll" version 111 successfully loaded
         shared lib "dw_stl.dll" version 111 successfully loaded
         shared lib "dw_gui.dll" version 111 successfully loaded
         shared lib "dw_mdm.dll" version 111 successfully loaded
    rdisp/softcancel_sequence :  -> 0,5,-1
    Mon Feb 18 16:08:52 2008
    WARNING => DpNetCheck: NiHostToAddr(www.doesnotexist0065.qqq.nxst) took 12 seconds
    Mon Feb 18 16:09:10 2008
    WARNING => DpNetCheck: NiAddrToHost(1.0.0.0) took 18 seconds
    ***LOG GZZ=> 2 possible network problems detected - check tracefile and adjust the DNS settings [dpxxtool2.c  5361]
    MtxInit: 30000 0 0
    DpSysAdmExtInit: ABAP is active
    DpSysAdmExtInit: VMC (JAVA VM in WP) is not active
    DpIPCInit2: start server >MTW02SDEC01_DE4_01                      <
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(wp_adm)          19976     (908)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(tm_adm)          3605136     (17936)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(wp_ca_adm)          18000     (60)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(appc_ca_adm)     6000     (60)
    DpCommTableSize: max/headSize/ftSize/tableSize=500/8/528040/528048
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(comm_adm)          528048     (1048)
    DpSlockTableSize: max/headSize/ftSize/fiSize/tableSize=0/0/0/0/0
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(slock_adm)          0     (96)
    DpFileTableSize: max/headSize/ftSize/tableSize=0/0/0/0
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(file_adm)          0     (72)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(vmc_adm)          0     (1296)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(wall_adm)          (22440/34344/56/100)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(gw_adm)     48
    DpShMCreate: SHM_DP_ADM_KEY          (addr: 065C0040, size: 4241064)
    DpShMCreate: allocated sys_adm at 065C0040
    DpShMCreate: allocated wp_adm at 065C1B30
    DpShMCreate: allocated tm_adm_list at 065C6938
    DpShMCreate: allocated tm_adm at 065C6968
    DpShMCreate: allocated wp_ca_adm at 06936BF8
    DpShMCreate: allocated appc_ca_adm at 0693B248
    DpShMCreate: allocated comm_adm at 0693C9B8
    DpShMCreate: system runs without slock table
    DpShMCreate: system runs without file table
    DpShMCreate: allocated vmc_adm_list at 069BD868
    DpShMCreate: allocated gw_adm at 069BD8A8
    DpShMCreate: system runs without vmc_adm
    DpShMCreate: allocated ca_info at 069BD8D8
    DpShMCreate: allocated wall_adm at 069BD8E0
    MBUF state OFF
    DpCommInitTable: init table for 500 entries
    EmInit: MmSetImplementation( 2 ).
    MM global diagnostic options set: 0
    <ES> client 0 initializing ....
    <ES> InitFreeList
    <ES> block size is 1024 kByte.
    Using implementation view
    <EsNT> Using memory model view.
    <EsNT> Memory Reset disabled as NT default
    <ES> 2046 blocks reserved for free list.
    ES initialized.
    WARNING => System running without ICM - check rdisp/start_icman [dpxxdisp.c   12437]
    rdisp/http_min_wait_dia_wp : 1 -> 1
    ***LOG Q0K=> DpMsAttach, mscon ( MTW02SDEC01) [dpxxdisp.c   11753]
    DpStartStopMsg: send start message (myname is >MTW02SDEC01_DE4_01                      <)
    DpStartStopMsg: start msg sent
    CCMS: AlInitGlobals : alert/use_sema_lock = TRUE.
    CCMS: start to initalize 3.X shared alert area (first segment).
    DpMsgAdmin: Set release to 7000, patchlevel 0
    MBUF state PREPARED
    MBUF component UP
    DpMBufHwIdSet: set Hardware-ID
    ***LOG Q1C=> DpMBufHwIdSet [dpxxmbuf.c   1050]
    DpMsgAdmin: Set patchno for this platform to 111
    Release check o.K.
    Mon Feb 18 16:09:13 2008
    MBUF state ACTIVE
    DpModState: change server state from STARTING to ACTIVE
    trc file: "dev_ms", trc level: 1, release: "700"
    [Thr 4724] Mon Feb 18 16:08:40 2008
    [Thr 4724] MsSSetTrcLog: trc logging active, max size = 20971520 bytes
    systemid   560 (PC with Windows NT)
    relno      7000
    patchlevel 0
    patchno    110
    intno      20050900
    make:      multithreaded, ASCII, optimized
    pid        5420
    [Thr 4724] ***LOG Q01=> MsSInit, MSStart (Msg Server 1 5420) [msxxserv.c   1824]
    [Thr 4724] MsInitAclInfo: acl file D:\usr\sap\put\DE4\SYS\global\ms_acl_info.DAT not found, unrestricted access
    [Thr 4724] MsGetOwnIpAddr: my host addresses are :
    [Thr 4724]   1 : [172.20.28.159] MTW02SDEC01.mindsap.com (HOSTNAME)
    [Thr 4724]   2 : [127.0.0.1] MTW02SDEC01.mindsap.com (LOCALHOST)
    [Thr 4724] MsHttpInit: full qualified hostname = MTW02SDEC01.mindsap.com
    [Thr 4724] HTTP logging is switch off
    [Thr 4724] MsHttpOwnDomain: own domain[1] = mindsap.com
    [Thr 4724] ms/icf_info_server : deleted
    [Thr 4724] *** I listen to port sapmsSHDDE4 (3601) ***
    [Thr 4724] CUSTOMER KEY: >J1537289841<
    trc file: "dev_rd", trc level: 1, release: "700"
    Mon Feb 18 16:09:10 2008
    ***LOG S00=> GwInitReader, gateway started ( 2344) [gwxxrd.c     1694]
    systemid   560 (PC with Windows NT)
    relno      7000
    patchlevel 0
    patchno    110
    intno      20050900
    make:      multithreaded, ASCII, optimized
    pid        2344
    gateway runs with dp version 229(ext=109) (@(#) DPLIB-INT-VERSION-229)
    gw/local_addr : 0.0.0.0
    CCMS: AlInitGlobals : alert/use_sema_lock = TRUE.
    CCMS: Initalizing shared memory of size 40000000 for monitoring segment.
    Bind service sapgw01 (socket) to port 3301
    GwPrintMyHostAddr: my host addresses are :
      1 : [172.20.28.159] MTW02SDEC01.mindsap.com (HOSTNAME)
      2 : [127.0.0.1] MTW02SDEC01.mindsap.com (LOCALHOST)
    DpSysAdmExtCreate: ABAP is active
    DpSysAdmExtCreate: VMC (JAVA VM in WP) is not active
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(wp_adm)          19976     (908)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(tm_adm)          3605136     (17936)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(wp_ca_adm)          18000     (60)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(appc_ca_adm)     6000     (60)
    DpCommTableSize: max/headSize/ftSize/tableSize=500/8/528040/528048
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(comm_adm)          528048     (1048)
    DpSlockTableSize: max/headSize/ftSize/fiSize/tableSize=0/0/0/0/0
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(slock_adm)          0     (96)
    DpFileTableSize: max/headSize/ftSize/tableSize=0/0/0/0
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(file_adm)          0     (72)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(vmc_adm)          0     (1296)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(wall_adm)          (22440/34344/56/100)
    DpShMCreate: sizeof(gw_adm)     48
    DpShMCreate: SHM_DP_ADM_KEY          (addr: 06110040, size: 4241064)
    DpShMCreate: allocated sys_adm at 06110040
    DpShMCreate: allocated wp_adm at 06111B30
    DpShMCreate: allocated tm_adm_list at 06116938
    DpShMCreate: allocated tm_adm at 06116968
    DpShMCreate: allocated appc_ca_adm at 0648B248
    DpShMCreate: allocated comm_adm at 0648C9B8
    DpShMCreate: system runs without slock table
    DpShMCreate: system runs without file table
    DpShMCreate: allocated vmc_adm_list at 0650D868
    DpShMCreate: allocated gw_adm at 0650D8A8
    DpShMCreate: system runs without vmc_adm
    DpShMCreate: allocated ca_info at 0650D8D8
    MtxInit: -2 0 0
    Mon Feb 18 16:09:14 2008
    GwDpInit: attached to gw_adm at 0650D8A8
    Thanks,
    Vadi

    Dear All,
    The issue has been resolved by changing the DDIC password to what it was when we have started the upgrade.The password was "welcome" when we have started with upgrade after that it has been changed to
    "basis05" during upgrade.we changed it back to welcome and it started working fine.
    Here it took long time to find out what was the password when we have starte upgrade.Resetting to standard ddic password also ddint help out in our case.
    Thanks for all your replies.

  • Some package installation error during zone installation steps.....

    hi,
    i am totally new to this technology.
    i had created 3 Zone's on X86 Sun Fire X4270 M2 Hardware (OS - Solaris 10 update 9)
    & during OS Installation i had selected Software installations using the Entire Distribution.
    every thing worked fine but during zone installation steps, got some package installation error (refer the below output)
    bash-3.00# zoneadm -z OFSMU-PWM-zone1 install
    Preparing to install zone <OFSMU-PWM-zone1>.
    Creating list of files to copy from the global zone.
    Copying <158400> files to the zone.
    Initializing zone product registry.
    Determining zone package initialization order.
    Preparing to initialize <1240> packages on the zone.
    Initialized <1240> packages on zone.
    Zone <OFSMU-PWM-zone1> is initialized.
    Installation of these packages generated errors: <SUNWpostgr-82-libs SUNWpostgr-82-devel SUNWpostgr-83-server-data-root SUNWpostgr-82-server SUNWpostgr-82-contrib SUNWpostgr-82-client SUNWpostgr-82-server-data-root>
    The file </zone/OFSMU-PWM-zone1/root/var/sadm/system/logs/install_log> contains a log of the zone installation.
    i checked the log file "/zone/OFSMU-PWM-zone1/root/var/sadm/system/logs/install_log"
    its show below error's
    *** package <SUNWpostgr-82-libs> failed to install with fatal errors:
    *** package <SUNWpostgr-82-devel> failed to install with fatal errors:
    need your help my friends..
    thanks in advance....
    Edited by: Raja Kondar on Dec 9, 2010 11:59 AM

    hi DR,
    thnks for reply..
    but i can see that "postgres" already exist in the system as user &l group.
    postgres:x:90:90:PostgreSQL Reserved UID:/:/usr/bin/pfksh
    also the failed packages duirng zone creation steps are already installed in the global zone..
    is thr any other way to resolve this issue....
    Edited by: Raja Kondar on Dec 16, 2010 11:00 AM

  • Releasing transport request has an error during the 'export' step.

    Hello Everyone,
    My environment is ERP 6.0 EHP6, AIX 6.3, Oracle 11g.
    We have a transport request that was created in our development system by deleting some obsolete roles. When we try to release the transport request to our q/a system it terminates with errors in the export step.
    The errors are.
       End of export R3TRTABUUSR10
       no E071K or E071K_STR entries found for R3TRTABUUSR11
       Start export R3TRTABUUSR12 ...
       no E071K or E071K_STR entries found for R3TRTABUUSR13
    Of course we cannot create a new transport request because the roles were deleted.
    Can someone please explain to me what could have cause this type of error and possibly how to resolve it?
    Regards,
    Ron

    Hi Ron,
    As per your log, no E071K or E071K_STR entries found forR3TRTABUUSR11
    no E071K or E071K_STR entries found for R3TRTABUUSR1
    Looks like there is no entry found for E071K or E071K_STR in table USR11 and USR13.
    Please check those table and make sure the above entries are there, if not that could be the issues.
    Also, please check if these tables (USR10, USR11, USR12 USR13)  are active in SE14.
    Thanks
    Adil

  • EM12c displaying Plug-in Error during OMS upgrade

    I'm doing a 2-System Upgrade from EM 10.2.0.5 to 12.1. The current OMS is on AIX 6.1 and the new OMS will be installed on RHEL 6.2. After staging the 12.1.0.1 plugins and agents on the source OMS (12.1.0.2 plugins with BP1 only available for Linux/Windows) and backing up my repository I am unable to upgrade to the new OMS because of error message seen in the screenshot below.
    https://s3.amazonaws.com/griddba/blogs/em12_oms_upgrade_error.png
    The Pre-upgrade Console indicates all agents and targets are upgradeable (green). I used the command ./runInstaller -pluginLocation /u02/orastage/em12c-agents/ to upgrade the agents during the OMS install. The downloaded plug-ins and agents were copied to /u02/orastage/em12c-agents.
    I checked the note EM 12c: Upgrading Enterprise Manager from 11.1.0.1 to 12.1.0.1 Fails with Error: Plugins are not present for installation of the current Management Service [ID 1437063.1] but it's still unclear why I'm getting this error since the plugin version is the same.
    Any ideas?
    Edited by: DBA on Jun 15, 2012 2:44 PM

    The bp1 for Aix will be released soon. You hav 2 options:
    a) you can wait for few more days and then pick the revisied plugins for aix platform and then do the upgrade.
    b) If you dont want to wait then you can run a specific sql to trun off the pre-req cheecks as sysman on the clones or backed up repository. Since this is an external form i donnt want to paste the sql here which will expose the repository table/parameters. Can you drop me an email and i will send you the sql.

  • Ideatab a3000 dead after error during firmware upgrade using flash tool

    i was upgrading to firmware version 4.2.2 with call option then i got an error message and the tablet is dead 
    any so;utions

    Dear uliwooly,
    I have tried in different PC, different version of flastool and different .tft file but all are failed!
    One thing i should share:
    My phone can connect to flash-mode without pressing volume down key!
    Plz reply....

  • Error during installation on step 6

    Hi all,
       Like some of you, I have installed and uninstalled the SP15 full java editions about 15 times now. I got my first error at the Install Temporary License step. Since then I have uninstalled, deleted registry entries and a whole bunch of steps, and am currently stuck at step 6 MaxDB Database Installation step. The error is
    ERROR 2006-01-16 15:46:21
    CJS-00030  Assertion failed: in function sapdb_db_create(db_nm, db_host, db_ver) {    var dep_root = sapdb_inst_root(db_nm);    var sdb_i = new sdbInstance();    sdb_i.dbName = db_nm;    sdb_i.dbHost = db_host;    sdb_i.dbVer = db_ver[0] + "." + db_ver[1];    sdb_i.ctlUser = sapdb_get_db_user("CONTROL", db_nm, db_host);    sdb_i.ctlUserPasswd = sapdb_get_db_user_passwd("CONTROL", db_nm, db_host);    var actorObj = new SdbExtActor();    actorObj.setSdbInstance(sdb_i);    actorObj.setDbmCmd("DB_CREATE");    actorObj.setExecutable(sapdb_dbmcli_path());    actorObj.setDbRoot(dep_root);    var rv = actorObj.sessionExecute();    ASSERT(arguments.callee, rv == "OK", " SDB: ERROR CREATING DATABASE INSTANCE! Check the XCMDOUT.LOG FILE");    var creation_ok = false;    var i_size = actorObj.outSize();    for (var i = 0; i < i_size; i++) {        var s_line = actorObj.getOutputLine(i);        if (/OK/.test(s_line)) {            creation_ok = true;        }    }    ASSERT(arguments.callee, creation_ok, "SDB: ERROR WHILE DB INSTANCE CREATION! CHECK THE XCMDOUT.LOG FILE! ");} SDB: ERROR CREATING DATABASE INSTANCE! Check the XCMDOUT.LOG FILE
    When I go to the log file the detailed information is as follows.
    > Subprocess starts at 20060116154621
    Execute Command : d:\sapdb\programs\pgm\dbmcli.exe  -R d:\sapdb\j2e\db db_create J2E CONTROL,CONTROL
    Execute Session Command : exit
    > Subprocess stops at 20060116154621
    ERR
    -24953,ERR_DBEXIST: database instance already exists
    I believe I am not able to successfully un-install MaxDB. Any hints? I always uninstall MaxDB before I start installing, and somehow the database entries still seem to persist like a ghost in the machine.
    Thank you for your help.
    Regards
    Sumit.

    Hi,
    The way I solved this problem was
    <b>1.</b>  Uninstall the entire netweaver installation.
    <b>2.</b> Log into windows in safe mode, by pressing F8 during installation, and then deleting the SAPDB directory.
    <b>3.</b> I deleted the following registry entries.
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\SAP\SAP DBTech
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\SAP\SAP DBTech
    Thank You.
    Sumit.

  • Upgrade Error Failed to upgrade SAP Business One Client

    Hi All,
    I have upgraded one of our customers from SAP 9.0 to 9.1 PL5.
    Everything upgraded successfully through the wizard. When launching the client, the 32 bit client upgraded with no errors. When attempting to open the 64 bit client  I get the error above. I have also uninstalled the 64 bit client and re installed from the B1-Shr folder with the same result. 
    This is a 64 bit Windows Server 2008 R2 machine. Log files are not showing any errors.
    Has anyone never ran into this?
    Sincerely,
    Chris Sorensen

    Chris
    I just had this happen with PL06.
    It gave me this message for both 32 bit and 64 bit client
    When I checked - even though it said it had not upgraded the 32 bit client it already had.
    With the 64 bit client I had to 100% reboot and go directly to the client upgrade and then it worked.
    You might try that.  Seems like something was interfering with it.

  • Inplace unicode conversion - error during import in step 2

    Hi,
    We are having problems when running the unicode conversion import in step 2: Load Kernel Library. The problem occurs when SAPINST runs the FIXR3OWNS program. We can run FIXR3OWNS manually when logged in with QSECOFR.
    From the sapinst_dev.log file:
    TRACE      [iaxxco4sys.cpp:57]
               iastring COS4SystemConnect::executeCommand(args_t const& _args)
    OS4Trace: Executing remote iSeries command: FIXR3OWNS LIB(SAP700UNEW) OBJ(*ALL).
    TRACE      [iaxxejsbas.hpp:451]
               EJS_Base::dispatchFunctionCall()
    JS Callback has thrown unknown exception
    TRACE      [iaxxcwalker.cpp:301]
               CDomWalker::processStep()
    From the job log:
       R3ADMAUTL.                                                             
    Authority given to user *PUBLIC for object R3DIR in SAP700UNEW object type
       *MENU.                                                                 
    Object authority granted.                                                
    Object R3KERNEL in SAP700UNEW type *MENU not secured by authorization list
       R3ADMAUTL.                                                             
    Authority given to user *PUBLIC for object R3KERNEL in SAP700UNEW object 
       type *MENU.                                                            
    Object authority granted.                                                
    Object R3MAIN in SAP700UNEW type *MENU not secured by authorization list 
       R3ADMAUTL.                                                             
    Not able to allocate object R3MAIN in SAP700UNEW type *MENU.             
    error: call_AS400_command: "CPF2211" caught after "FIXR3OWNS             
       LIB(SAP700UNEW) OBJ(*ALL)"                                          
    What could be wrong? It is our SIDOFR user?
    Best regards
    Henrik Hviid

    Hi Volker,
    Thank you very much. Stupid error :-).
    I also did step 2 with fixr3owns yesterday with SAPINST and then it worked. I got to step 3 "iSeries Installation Step", but got an error in SAPINST when "Creating infrastructure for SAP system BND". I logged off SAPINST, patched CRTR3SYS and started SAPINST again and then got the error in step 2 wirh fixr3owns.
    I´m now past step 2 and in step 3 "iSeries Installation Step". And I get the same error as I got yesterday...
    From the job log:
    TMKSVR request processor: request was successful                      
    Processing request from client 10.96.220.5:4350.                      
    EXECUTE CRTR3SYS SID(BND) GLOBALHOST('SAP002') FORCEPROF(*NO)     
      ADBHOST('SAP002') 1 N                                               
    Keyword GLOBALHOST not valid for this command.                        
    Keyword FORCEPROF not valid for this command.                         
    Keyword ADBHOST not valid for this command.                           
    Error found on CRTR3SYS command.                                      
    Errors occurred in command.                                           
    error: call_AS400_command: "CPF0006" caught after "CRTR3SYS SID(BND)  
      GLOBALHOST('SAP002') FORCEPROF(*NO) ADBHOST('SAP002')"              
    I can run "CRTR3SYS SID(BND) GLOBALHOST('SAP002') FORCEPROF(*NO)" manually.
    Do you have any ideas?
    Best regards
    Henrik Hviid

  • Error during post-installation step of UR4 for SCSM 2012 R2

    Hello experts,
    When attempting to execute the process documented in the "Resynchronize System Center Operations Manager mount point data" section of the UR4 installation instructions, we run into the following error.  Has anyone
    else encountered this error?  What exactly is this PS1 script attempting to fix?
    Thanks!
    Error:
    PS C:\program files\microsoft system center 2012\Service Manager\powershell>.\OMCIConnector_SyncMetadata_UpdateTimestamp.PS1
    Processing for the OM CI Connector number #1 .....
     Connector FullName is Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.LinkingFramework.OpsMgrConnector.Config:bad1b127-5ea0-43f6-916d-2c5ea7e26789
    Error: OMCIConnector_SyncMetadata_UpdateTimestamp.ps1 script execution failed!
    Caught an exception:
    Exception Type: System.InvalidOperationException
    Exception Message: There is an error in XML document (25216, 18).
    Inner Exception Message: System.Xml.XmlException: Unexpected XML declaration. The XML declaration must be the first node in the document, and no white space characters are allowed to appear
    before it. Line 25216, position 18.
    at System.Xml.XmlTextReaderImpl.Throw(String res, String arg)
    at System.Xml.XmlTextReaderImpl.ParsePI(StringBuilder piInDtdStringBuilder)
    at System.Xml.XmlTextReaderImpl.ParseDocumentContent()
    at System.Xml.XmlReader.ReadEndElement()
    at Microsoft.Xml.Serialization.GeneratedAssembly.XmlSerializationReaderSyncMetadata.Read8_SyncMetadata(Boolean isNullable, Boolean checkType)
    at Microsoft.Xml.Serialization.GeneratedAssembly.XmlSerializationReaderSyncMetadata.Read9_SyncMetadata()

    When installing the VS Isolated Shell, make sure the actual binaries (found on the root drive or where you extract the web installer) are installed. This will resolve the above error and also the Prerequisite issue that a lot of people are coming across.
    Regards, Zoeb Khan

  • Error during OIM schema upgrade during product ugprade from 9.1.0.2 to 11g

    Hi All,
    We have received following error during product upgrade from 9.1.0.2 to 11g.
    Error occurred during fourth step ( Task 4: Use Upgrade Assistant to Upgrade the Oracle Identity Manager Schema)
    On the screen while running upgrade assistance (ua.bat)
    Following message came on screen.
    Schema Version registry >> succeeded
    Oracle Identity Manager Schema Upgrade >> Failed
    I could see only following error in the log file.
    \middleware_home\Oracle_IDM1/server/db/oim/oracle/Upgrade/Oracle_upg_91_92_x2ell_92.sql
    [2012-06-28T09:34:51.147-06:00] [FrameworkMR] [NOTIFICATION] [] [upgrade.FrameworkMR] [tid: 14] [ecid: 0000JWnikOB6qIvyKWYBSQ1Fv7Zd000005,0] finalize() instance 1 of 2
    [2012-06-28T09:35:00.863-06:00] [OIM] [INCIDENT_ERROR] [] [upgrade.OIM] [tid: 13] [ecid: 0000JWnijRj6qIvyKWYBSQ1Fv7Zd000004,0] UPGCMP-00924: SQL error [{0}]
    [2012-06-28T09:35:00.863-06:00] [OIM] [INCIDENT_ERROR] [] [upgrade.OIM] [tid: 13] [ecid: 0000JWnijRj6qIvyKWYBSQ1Fv7Zd000004,0] [[
    java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object
    ORA-06512: at line 31
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:457)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:405)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.processError(T4C8Oall.java:889)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.receive(T4CTTIfun.java:476)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIfun.doRPC(T4CTTIfun.java:204)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.doOALL(T4C8Oall.java:540)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CStatement.doOall8(T4CStatement.java:202)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CStatement.executeForRows(T4CStatement.java:1074)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1466)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.executeUpdateInternal(OracleStatement.java:2123)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.executeUpdate(OracleStatement.java:2067)
         at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatementWrapper.executeUpdate(OracleStatementWrapper.java:306)
         at oracle.ias.mrua.plugin.oim.SchemaUpgrader.loadScript(SchemaUpgrader.java:303)
         at oracle.ias.mrua.plugin.oim.SchemaUpgrader.doUpgrade(SchemaUpgrader.java:139)
         at oracle.ias.mrua.plugin.oim.OIMSchemaUpgradePlugin.doUpgrade(OIMSchemaUpgradePlugin.java:302)
         at oracle.ias.mrua.MRUA.executePlugins(MRUA.java:3672)
         at oracle.ias.mrua.MRUA.internal_driver(MRUA.java:2448)
         at oracle.ias.mrua.MRUA.driver(MRUA.java:1710)
         at oracle.ias.upgrade.gui.UAUpgradeThread.run(UAUpgradeThread.java:390)
    Any Idea ?
    Ritu

    Hi All,
    We are also trying to upgrade OIM 9.1.0.2 which is present in our environment to OIM11g. Request your help.
    Now how do we achieve the upgrade? Should my source of OIM9i software  and target of OIM 11g software  be installed on the same server?
    I did install OIM11g and OIM9i on the same server  and tried to do schema upgrade based on the link:
    Upgrading Oracle Identity Manager Environment
    But during examine phase I get error the below error
    UPGAST 00091- ERROR DURING EXAMINE OF COMPONENETS
    UPGAST 01004- UPGRADE IS UNABLE TO DYNAMICALLY LOAD COMPONENET SPECIFIC SOFTWARE MODULES.
    When i check in the log in internet it says :
    Cause: Repository upgrade framework was unable to dynamically load the Java classes of its component-specific software modules. mrua.xml file might have been corrupted.
    Action: This is an internal error. Verify that the Java classpath has been correctly set, the mrua.xml file is correct, and that the .jar files for all component-specific software modules are present in the jlib directory. Contact Oracle Support Services for assistance
    What is the javaclasspath to be set?how to check if mrua.xml and jar files are fine
    Pls help.Any help is much appreciated.

  • LONGPOST.LOG Errors during Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0

    Dear all,
    We have received the below errors during our upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
    Basically we have received three types of errors:
    1.
    4PETG065 RSUPGDEC: Table/structure "BAPE_VBAK" (component "SD-SLS" ) enhanced illegally: Error "2"
    2.
    A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "/IRM/BADI_SDDOCFLOW" must still be migrated
    A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZOTC218E_1" must still be migrated
    A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZZ_MG_MASS_NEWSEG" must still be migrated A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZOTC218E_1" must still be migrated
    A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZOTC218E_1" must still be migrated
    3.
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "/SSF/DHEAD" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "/SSF/DTAB" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "/SSF/PTAB" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    Can anyone help us how to solve this issues.
    Thanks & Regards
    Senthil

    Hi,
    Senthil following are ans to ur questions
    1. After the SPAU remediation is completed, should I manually release the transport or should I start the upgrade and the upgrade will release that transport?
    Ans : Once your SPAU remediation is completed you should release the requests and then start the upgrade of the DEV system.
    2. How do we import this SPDD & SPAU transport in the QA and PRD, I mean at what stage of the upgrade we need to specify/ include this transport?
    Ans : Now when you start the QA or PRD upgrade at that time you come across a phase during PREPARE called ADJUSTPRP.
    Refer following note for further information --
    SAPNote 124522 - Importing a modification adjustment in 2nd upgrade
    3. Suppose the QA & PRD has more objects to adjust than our Dev box, and this transport will not take care of the delta objects, so in that case how should we remediate, we need to create an other transport request in QA and then it will become two transports?
    Ans : First of all this should not be the scenario where you have more modified objects than that in DEV. As all the modfications should take place in DEV first and then should be transported to QA and then PRD. But in such case what you can do is complete the upgrade of QA system and then you are still having 14 days to complete the SPAU objects. So you can make another request which can be transported as a post upgrade activity once the upgrade is completed in production. For SPDD you will have to take care of the SPDD objects if there are different than those in DEV during the ACT_700 phase only or else you might risk data.
    This is the reason why SAP always asks you to follow a proper transport path.
    4. If our dev box has more objects for remediation than our QA & PRD, then will these objects be also imported into the QA & PRD box?
    Ans : Yes, thats why you should be very sure about the SPAU objects that you have found in DEV. You need to compare the objects with QA and PRD and then only make the modifications.
    I hope i have answered all your queries.
    Regards,
    Suhas

  • Yosemite upgrade error in email

    There was an error during the upgrade to Yosemite about the email but no steps to follow to recover and the final message was that the upgrade was successful. The only thing that seems wrong is an error when Redirecting a message. How do I fix the email software or message databases?
    System Info:
    iMac Mid 2011
    2.8 Ghz i7
    8 GB memory
    OS 10.10.1
    Symptoms:
    I've set up a web site that scans an email account and posts messages on the blog page. When I get a message I want to post, I Redirect the message ( not forward ) to the blog email account. Sometimes the message gets to the Outbox and stays there. Opening the message stuck in the outbox reveals the message header has been modified. There is no To: address, the Reply To: has been changed to my email address and the sending email account is set to the wrong account. When I correct these things and click send the message continues on its way as it should.

    what's the URL for your site where you're seeing this error?

Maybe you are looking for