Show/Hide Permissions on the upload iview

Hi All,
I wonder, if there is some way to solve my problem?
What I need is to add <u>Show/Hide Permissions</u> to the upload iview.
Do you remember, we have <u>Show/Hide Properties </u> on the upload iview, so that users can upload files and also add properties on the same screen (and they find it very useful). But if they want to change permissions, they have to return to the KM navigation and open permissions iview for the item. If I'll be able to add entrance to the permissions on the same screen, it will help a lot.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Inna Karp

Hi Inna,
you would have to extend the upload screenflow by yourself, means to decompile the concernced classes and add your extra logic. But be warned: The upload screenflow has been grown in a long time, obviously without a cut and a redesign after having added different functionality. It's no fun at all to work with the sources. And it is full of (minor) bugs, what means that it will be under development with probably every patch arising. So if you make your own, extended screenflow, you will have the choice to work under a complete new namespaces (carrying old bugs over the time) or to make the extension again and again with every patch. Anyhow, it won't be that straight forward.
> they have to return to the KM navigation and open
> permissions iview for the item
Normally, you will have come from the Navigation iView, so returning to it will happen automatically, won't it? Maybe as a workaround, you could add the command to open the permissions screen directly on the resource command list, so that one does not always have to use the Details command before?!
Hope it helps
Detlev

Similar Messages

How to make a layer from the ADF pivot table invisible , show-hide column-row-data

Hello all ,
I need to create a pivottable with ADF 12c for reporting purposes.
I have a table or view with 10 items of type VARCHAR2 , C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C7,C8,C9,C10 and 10 items of type NUMBER N1,N2,N3,N4,N5,N6,N7,N8,N9,N10
The items of type VARCHAR2 are for Column and Row areas and the items NUMBER are for Data Areas
I want to create a jsf page with one empty pivottable and in code Show or Hide the items in the Column area , Row area , Data area
Con you send me a small sample ?
I test with this code that i find in oracle OTN but not work.
<dvt:pivotTable id="pt2" value="#{bindings.WebPivotDataView1.pivotTableModel}" var="cellData"
varStatus="cellStatus" splitMode="enabled"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.CmfPivotBean.pivotTable}"
>
<dvt:headerCell>
<af:switcher facetName="#{cellData.layerName}" defaultFacet="Default" id="s1">
<f:facet name="DataLayer">
<af:outputText value="#{cellData.label}" id="ot1"/>
</f:facet>
<f:facet name="C01">
<af:outputText value="#{cellData.dataValue}" id="ot2"/>
</f:facet>
<f:facet name="Default">
<af:outputText value="#{cellData.dataValue}" id="ot3"/>
</f:facet>
</af:switcher>
</dvt:headerCell>
<dvt:dataCell>
<af:switcher facetName="#{cellStatus.members.DataLayer.value}" defaultFacet="Default" id="s2">
<f:facet name="N01">
<af:outputText value="#{cellData.dataValue}" id="ot4">
<af:convertNumber groupingUsed="false"
pattern="#{bindings.WebPivotDataView1.hints.N01.format}"/>
</af:outputText>
</f:facet>
<f:facet name="Default">
<af:outputText value="#{cellData.dataValue}" id="ot5"/>
</f:facet>
</af:switcher>
</dvt:dataCell>
</dvt:pivotTable>
DCBindingContainer bindingContainer = (DCBindingContainer)ADFContext.getCurrent().getRequestScope().get("bindings");
CubicBinding cubicBinding = (CubicBinding)bindingContainer.findCtrlBinding("WebPivotDataView1");
CubicEditor cubicEditor = cubicBinding.getCubicEditor();
cubicEditor.removeLayer(DataDirector.ROW_EDGE, 0); //remove 1st row edge
cubicEditor.removeLayer(DataDirector.COLUMN_EDGE, 0); // remove 1st column edge
cubicEditor.removeDataItem(0);
CubicDefinition def;
def = cubicBinding.getProjection();
LayerDefinition layerDefinition = new LayerDefinition("C3");
cubicEditor.addLayer(DataDirector.ROW_EDGE, 0, layerDefinition);
LayerDefinition layerDefinition2 = new LayerDefinition("C4");
cubicEditor.addLayer(DataDirector.COLUMN_EDGE, 0, layerDefinition2);
DataItemDefinition def3 = new DataItemDefinition("N1");
cubicEditor.addDataItem(def3);
AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(pivotTable);
Can you help me if is possible to create a pivottable binding to a one ViewObject and in code show/hide or compose the layout of the pivottable ??
I search in google and OTN oracle and not find any code.
Only find the code of the samples that is very complex for me , the code of the samples create the PivotTableModel from one Array , and i want to binding from one ADB BC ViewObject.
Thanks in advance

The solution I presented for your use case an DOAG 2013 was to create a pivot table binding out of user defined attributes from the table. For the defined attributes a VO is dynamically created as well as the pivot binding. The pivot binding is then exchanged at runtime together with the activation of the dynamic VO needed to only get the data needed for the particularly pivot table.
Your solution using the CubicEditor is hard to implement due to the missing documentation. This was the reason I did not follow this approach, However it's not impossible (done it on a very small scale).
None of the solution are what I call simple. They are complicated, complex and in part not supported solution (exchanging the pivot table binding at runtime need to use internal classes, which is not supported).
I can't give you a working sample as it's too complex. I can make the slides available, however they are in German.
Timo

Show-Hide element in Dreamweaver CS5

Please can you tell me why when I validate a web page I get the following error when using the Show-Hide behaviour. The error is only reported for the first use of the feature and no of the others. I don't understand.
Line 239,         Column 235:     there is no attribute "onload"…HideLayers('drive','','hide')" onload="MM_showHideLayers('drive','','hide')" /…
✉
You have used the attribute named above in your document, but the       document type you are using does not support that attribute for this       element. This error is often caused by incorrect use of the "Strict"       document type with a document that uses frames (e.g. you must use       the "Transitional" document type to get the "target" attribute), or       by using vendor proprietary extensions such as "marginheight" (this       is usually fixed by using CSS to achieve the desired effect instead).
This error may also result if the element itself is not supported in       the document type you are using, as an undefined element will have no       supported attributes; in this case, see the element-undefined error       message for further information.
How to fix: check the spelling and case of the element and attribute,        (Remember XHTML is all lower-case) and/or        check that they are both allowed in the chosen document type, and/or       use CSS instead of this attribute. If you received this error when using the        <embed> element to incorporate flash media in a Web page, see the        FAQ item on valid flash.
Below is a copy of the relevant code -The code in bold is the line causing the error. You will notice I have used it more than once, but I didn't get any other error messages. Please help.
<h3>Artist Drive and Palette</h3>
    
   <div id="drive"><img src="Images/Artist Drive large.jpg" alt="Artist Drive" width="300" height="195" title="Artist Drive" onmouseover="MM_showHideLayers('drive','','show')" onmouseout="MM_showHideLayers('drive','','hide')" onload="MM_showHideLayers('drive','','hide')" />
    </div>
    <img src="Images/Artist Drive.jpg" alt="Artist Drive" width="100" height="56" class="fltlft" title="Artist Drive" onmouseover="MM_showHideLayers('drive','','show')" onmouseout="MM_showHideLayers('drive','','hide')" onload="MM_showHideLayers('drive','','hide')" />
    <div id="palette"><img src="Images/Artist Palette large.jpg" alt="Artist's palette" width="300" height="194" title="Artist's Palette" onmouseover="MM_showHideLayers('palette','','show')" onmouseout="MM_showHideLayers('palette','','hide')" onload="MM_showHideLayers('palette','','hide')" />
    </div>
    <img src="Images/Artist Palette.jpg" alt="Artist Palette" width="100" height="60" class="fltrt" title="Artist's Palette" onmouseover="MM_showHideLayers('palette','','show')" onmouseout="MM_showHideLayers('palette','','hide')" onload="MM_showHideLayers('palette','','hide')" />
    <p class="size">These formations are in Death Vally, California, USA. Artist's Drive rises up to the top of an alluvial fan fed by a deep canyon cut into the Black Mountains. Artist's Palette is on the face of the Black Mountains and is noted for having various colours of rock. These colours are caused by the oxidation of different metals (red, pink and yellow is from iron salts, green is from decomposing tuff-derived mica, and manganese produces the purple). Called the Artist Drive Formation, the rock unit provides evidence for one of the Death Valley area's most violently explosive volcanic periods. The Miocene-aged formation is made up of cemented gravel, playa deposits, and much volcanic debris, perhaps 5,000 feet (1500 m) thick. Chemical weathering and hydrothermal alteration are also responsible for the variety of colours displayed in the Artist Drive Formation and nearby exposures of the Furnace Creek Formation.
    </p>
    <h3>Badlands</h3>
     
    <div id="badland"><img src="Images/The Badlands large.jpg" alt="The Badlands" width="300" height="183" onmouseover="MM_showHideLayers('badland','','show')" onmouseout="MM_showHideLayers('badland','','hide')" onload="MM_showHideLayers('badland','','hide')" />
    </div>
    <p><img src="Images/The Badlands.jpg" alt="The Badlands" width="100" height="61" class="fltlft" onmouseover="MM_showHideLayers('badland','','show')" onmouseout="MM_showHideLayers('badland','','hide')" onload="MM_showHideLayers('badland','','hide')" />
    </p>
    <div id="badland1"><img src="Images/The Badlands1 large.jpg" alt="The Badlands" width="300" height="132" onmouseover="MM_showHideLayers('badland1','','show')" onmouseout="MM_showHideLayers('badland1','','hide')" onload="MM_showHideLayers('badland1','','hide')" />
    </div>
    <img src="Images/The Badlands1.jpg" alt="The Badlands" width="100" height="44" class="fltrt" onmouseover="MM_showHideLayers('badland1','','show')" onmouseout="MM_showHideLayers('badland1','','hide')" onload="MM_showHideLayers('badland1','','hide')" />
    <p class="size">Badlands National Park, in southwest South Dakota preserves 242,756 acres (98,240 ha) of sharply eroded buttes, pinnacles, and spires blended with the largest protected mixed grass prairie in the United States. On-going rains, freezes and thaws have revealed millions of years of sediment that paint a colourful landscape on the prairies of south-western South Dakota. It contains the world's richest Oligocene epoch fossil beds, dating 23 to 35 million years old.
    </p>

Sometimes DW's javascripts will throw errors like that, most of the time it can be ignored.
What doctype are you using (the first line of your html)?
If you have a "Strict" Doctype, did you try changing it to a "Transitional" version as the error report suggested?
Edit > Preferences > New Document > Default Document Type (DTD) > Change from Strict to Transitional of the same version.

Show/hide elements in DW CS3

I've just posted this question and got a reply from John
Waller, thanks John, but what I mean is that I don't want to use
layers, this has to do with the positioning in a table. I want to
add images to a table which is in a layer so I can put margin-left
and margin-right for the layer to "auto" so the whole table
(including images) will always be centered. If I add layers to the
table and add images to the layers (to get the mouse-over effect)
the layers will not move with the table to the center of the page,
I hope you guys know what I mean.
Anybody knows if it would be possible in DW CS3 to do so, see
the original question underneath to get the picuture:
Thanks again.
Hi
In DW8 I often used the possibility to put several layers on
top of eachother with images in them, this way I could show/hide
layers so the images would be visible when having a mouse-over
action on a thumbnail for example.
Now DW-CS3 gives the option show/hide elements, however, I
can not simply put elements on top of eachother, which is what I
want.
Am I stuck on using DW8 and the show/hide layers option, or
is there a way to put multiple images (elements) on top of
eachother in DW-CS3?
Thanks, have a nice day
Ferrohead

> table which is in a layer so
> I can put margin-left and margin-right for the layer to
"auto" so the
> whole
> table (including images) will always be centered.
You don't need to use a 'layer' for that, and I assume that
you mean a <div>
not a layer, since the latter implies absolute positioning.
> If I add layers to the table
I sure hope you are referring to just div tags and not
layers, because you
would never want to put an absolutely positioned element
directly into a
table cell.
> I hope you guys know what I mean.
Yes, I'm afraid I do. This whole scheme is just wrong.
It would be much better to use the SetText behavior to simply
dynamically
write the desired image link into a named container on the
page, much like
you can see being done here -
http://dreamweaverresources.com/tutorials/settextoflayer.htm
and a tutorial
http://www.dreamweaverresources.com/tutorials/settextoflayer.htm
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"Ferrohead" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:[email protected]...
> I've just posted this question and got a reply from John
Waller, thanks
> John,
> but what I mean is that I don't want to use layers, this
has to do with
> the
> positioning in a table. I want to add images to a table
which is in a
> layer so
> I can put margin-left and margin-right for the layer to
"auto" so the
> whole
> table (including images) will always be centered. If I
add layers to the
> table
> and add images to the layers (to get the mouse-over
effect) the layers
> will not
> move with the table to the center of the page, I hope
you guys know what I
> mean.
>
> Anybody knows if it would be possible in DW CS3 to do
so, see the original
> question underneath to get the picuture:
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Hi
> In DW8 I often used the possibility to put several
layers on top of
> eachother
> with images in them, this way I could show/hide layers
so the images would
> be
> visible when having a mouse-over action on a thumbnail
for example.
> Now DW-CS3 gives the option show/hide elements, however,
I can not simply
> put
> elements on top of eachother, which is what I want.
> Am I stuck on using DW8 and the show/hide layers option,
or is there a way
> to
> put multiple images (elements) on top of eachother in
DW-CS3?
>
> Thanks, have a nice day
>
> Ferrohead
>
>

Jquery show/hide not working in contribute CS5 or CS6

We use Dreamweaver templates and our users use contribute CS5 or contribute CS6 to edit webpages. We recently added some Jquery code that shows/hides DIVs on the webpage. When our users try to edit this page, the Divs are hidden they are not able to see the content to edit it. Is there a workaround for this?

Hi motiondude,
I am having a similar problem with CS6 and show/hide buttons in an interactive PDF. I am having the German CS6 version of InDesign (just as info).
What my problem is: I have made some sort of „gallery“, where there are small versions of all pictures on the page, and a big version of everyone are on a pile over each other.
When you click the small „preview“ image I made a show/hide action that it should show the big version of the picture. This worked fine on the first page where I tried this!
But on the second page with other images it wasn’t working at all. When I opened the PDF in my Acrobat Pro (Version 10.1.7) the buttons did not show up the pictures when I
clicked them. The first image stayed there.
I for sure checked my setting several times, everything is fine and correct in the actions and buttons area. In the SWF preview I checked it too, everything should work fine.
Yes, I know that this preview is just for SWF, but it is a fast checking tool for actions.
Afterwards I also tried opening the file with the PDF viewer. The problem still was there.
What „solved“ my problem for now was to make an idml and open the file in CS5. Making an interactive PDF out of the CS5 – and it worked!
Though I am just at the very beginning of my document, so lets see if CS5 will be my solution until I am finished with it.
To summ it up, it seems this is really a bug in CS6. I also read here http://forums.adobe.com/message/4482056 that this seems to be a bug. But one in the forum mentioned
this bug should be fixed with the new release. But this was back in 2012! I have the newest update. But I still have the problem.
Maybe it will take some time until it is fixed in the German version? I am not sure. It is really annoying.
I think writing a bug report should be done in this case!

Show Hide Behaviour

I am trying to assign a show hide behavior to my portfolio. I already have an image rollover in place on 15 individual images in a grid, basically a brighter version of the thumbnail when on hover.
What I also want to do is assign a show/hide behaviour to each individual thumbnail as well as the rollover which will show a paragraph about each piece of artwork when hovering over the thumbnail. I can implement the rollover easily enough but when the show hide is added the div I am trying to show just flickers briefly on hover then dissapears...
Any info would get greatly appreciated?
Heggie

I already have an image rollover in place on 15 individual images in a grid, basically a brighter version of the thumbnail when on hover.
FYI: You could do this with much less code and only one set of images using CSS opacity.
CSS:
#thumbnail img {opacity: 0.5 }
#thumbnail img:hover {opacity: 1.0}
HTML:
<div id="thumbnail">
<img src="image1.jpg">
<img src="image2.jpg">
<img src="image3.jpg">
<img src="image4.jpg">
</div>
Anyway, to answer your original question. IMO Show/Hide behaviors work best with onClick event triggers. onMouseover triggers are squirrely especially for touch screen devices.
See demo below, view source to see the code.
http://alt-web.com/DEMOS/Show-Hide-Layers.html
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/

Show/hide fields when selecting an option from a drop-down menu.

Hello Gurus!
I have a question about creating a Java Script withing Acrobat pro. This is what i would like to do: I created a drop-down menu with several selection entries. Upon the customer making one of the selection entries, i would like for the correct fields that i created to become visible and all other fields to hide. Is this even possible to do? The reasoning behind this is because we have a form that customers have to generate in order to request access to certain financial accounts; we have over 20 different types of accounts and for each instance the customer has to fill out the same form. By creating a drop down menu, i can use the same form by just changing the drop-down selection and clicking on the designated fields for that selection. At this time i have over 20 different forms that poing to 20 different account requests and i would hate to send the form 20 different times to one person. The reason i can not add all fields desired for all accounts is due to the fact that the form would be filled with hundreds of checkmarks and instructions thus making the process too tideous for the customer. Hope you guys can help out.
~Vader

The good news is, it can be done (and it has been done).
There are a few things to be aware of, however.
The most important is that the form must be planned well, which means that you must think carefully about your logic and even more so about your field naming (hierarchical field names are your friend). One fundamental issue, you have to be aware of, is that this form no longer will be a "standard form". The consequence of this is that you may have to be aware that you might get into trouble when you have to prove that your user filled out that particular standard form (talk to your compliance and forms management people about that).
You also may have to decide whether the form should be usable in Reader. And, if so, how much you want to spend on the right to do so. You will see below why…
There are actually two approaches for dynamically showing/hiding parts of a form. If your form can be separated between a fixed first page (where you also have the account type selection), and a variable part (depending on the selection), you could use Templates, which you spawn according to the selection, and delete pages when you change the selection. This approach is very easy to implement, but requires Reader Extensions Server to allow it to work in Reader; Acrobat Pro's extended rights are not sufficient for that.
The other approach is showing/hiding fields. If you did your homework well, it would be very easy to first hide all subsequent fields, and then show the ones you need in two lines of code. This approach does not require extended rights for Reader at all, as long as your forms will always have the same number of pages, for each of your account types. This approach also works for the cases where the differences between the individual forms are very small. It does also work for showing/hiding bigger chunks of the form. In that case, you might create the "background" separately, and then put it as an icon into a button field which you will show/hide together with the carefully placed on top of it active fill-out fields.
There is a third possibility, which Adobe Propaganda probably would suggest, and that woudl be subforms in LiveCycle Designer. The consequence is, however, that you won't have PDF forms, but proprietary XFA forms instead. And you may have more developing and maintenance work than with the other approaches.
Back to your original question: you could use a Keystroke script evaluating event.changeEx of the combo box field. Depending on that, you would run your action to set up the according form part. The other way to do it would be evaluating event.value in the onBlur event. The latter would have the advantage that the selection has been made, and you get a bit more time to set up the form (this may in fact be an issue, particularly with Acrobat 9 and 10, which may take their time to show/hide fields).
Another possibility instead of a drop down (combo box field) would be a popup, where you would have a button to press, and the list of selections pops up. This second method uses app.popUpMenuEx().
Hope this can help.
Max Wyss.

Show/hide elements

Hi
In DW8 I often used the possibility to put several layers on
top of eachother with images in them, this way I could show/hide
layers so the images would be visible when having a mouse-over
action on a thumbnail for example.
Now DW-CS3 gives the option show/hide elements, however, I
can not simply put elements on top of eachother, which is what I
want.
Am I stuck on using DW8 and the show/hide layers option, or
is there a way to put multiple images (elements) on top of
eachother in DW-CS3?
Thanks, have a nice day
Ferrohead

The functionality is identical in CS3, just the terms have
changed.
Layers (8) = AP Divs (CS3)
Show/Hide Layers (8) = Show/Hide Elements (CS3)
Go to the AP Elements panel (F2 or Window > AP Elements)
and ensure that 1)
all AP Elements are stacked on top of each other (ie there
are no child
elements which are shown by the name being indented in the
list); 2) each
Element has a unique Z index (if not re-number them manually
so they're
unique).
Then apply the Show-Hide Elements behavior to each AP
Element.
Regards
John Waller

Show-Hide Navigation with sub-nav

Hi,
I'm trying to create a navigation that will show/hide on
mouse on/off. Now, I've managed to get the first level to work, but
struggling with the sub-nav.
I have an MC (that contains the animation) that uses hitTest
for the show/hide which allows the buttons inside the mc to work.
I've tried a few ways to get the Sub-Nav to work but banging
my head against a brick wall... can anyone help or point me in the
right direction??
You can get the files from here if required:
Flash
Files (FLA/SWF)
Files are CS3 - AS2.0
Mucho Appreciato!

Found method, just using
AdfmfContainerUtilities.showNavigationBar();
AdfmfContainerUtilities.hideNavigationBar();

Show/hide detail row

Carl:
See http://htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=24317:6
I modified your nifty example at http://htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=11933:1
to use images instead of the show/hide detail labels.
I had to make some minor mods to the code, but it works fine...for the most part.
I used the option to show only 1 detail row at a time.
If I click the show/hide images rapidly (actually I am not sure it is the rapidly part, haven't been able to reproduce it consistently), I end up with a situation where more than 1 detail row is visible at the same time.
Can you please take a look and see if I am doing anything wrong?
Thanks

Mostly in IE, here is an example
http://i3.tinypic.com/vo3bbn.jpg
I am not sure of the exact sequence of clicks I did to land up at the screenshot, but I think rapidly clicking that show/hide image does it.
Taking a look at the code
function showdetail(t,i)The "t" that I am passing in to the function would be the IMG element in my case.
I modified the Toggle function as
function ToggleLabel(pThis)
        var l_show_img="/i/themes/theme_10/showhide_show.gif";
        var l_hide_img="/i/themes/theme_10/showhide_hidden.gif";
        var l_show_re=new RegExp(l_show_img+"$");
        pThis.src = (pThis.src.match(l_show_re)) ? l_hide_img : l_show_img;
}where I flip the src attribute of the image.
I am not sure what is wrong. If something were wrong, why would it work at all? Why would clicking stuff fast cause it to break?
Thanks for any help.
And I am not using AJAX at all, just your plain DHTML example at 11933:1
Ah, I got it. Doing the following reproduces the bad state in both IE and FF consistently
1. Launch the page in a new session
2. Click the show/hide image on the first row to show the text
3. Click it again to hide it
4. Now click the image on the 2nd row.
This shows the 2nd row's description...but it also shows the first rows description!
Any idea why?
Thanks

Show Hide Columns

Is there a way in which columns can be hidden from the resulting html report.
I guess to bring them back you would have to click on show all, or something like that ?
It would be like accessing setting a show/hide checkbox in the Report Attributes but in this case allowing the user to make the choice.
Any ideas would be appreciated

Mark,
One way of doing this would be to make the columns conditionally displayed. You could then write a condition that e.g. checks the value of a page item being yes or no. The page item could be set by the user. So you could have a radio group, or button, or select list to turn off or turn on columns within your application.
Regards,
Marc

Calling 'show hide' event from 'select' event

Hi all,
is it possible to call an event from another event?
Can i call the 'show hide' event from the 'select' event to disclose the selected row?
As a sidenote: is it possible to remove the show/hide button/link but to retain the show/hide functionality?
Thanks in advance....
Regards,
Robert

Hi Gabrielle,
Yes indeed... the row information is sent... the 'select' event i'm refferring to is the one generated when you drag a viewobject as a readonly table to a UIX datapage...
It is generated initially as
<event name="select" source="EmpView10">
    <set target="${bindings.EmpView1Iterator}" property="currentRowIndexInRange" value="${ui:tableSelectedIndex(uix, 'EmpView10')}"/>
</event>However i must have made a typo last time as it works now... ohwell.. made some changes and submitted the selected row as parameter using
    <invoke method="handleEvent" javaType="view.DisclosureEventHandler">
        <parameters>
            
            <parameter javaType="java.lang.String" value="${ui:tableSelectedIndex(uix, 'EmpView10')}" />
            
            <parameter javaType="java.lang.String" value="detailDisclosure" />
            
            <parameter javaType="oracle.cabo.servlet.expl.ControllerImplicitObject" value="${uix}"/>
        </parameters>
</invoke>This works more cleanly and can be reused...
Thanks for your replies... it always helps when someone is thinking along... it makes you takes some crossroads you wouldn't think of...
Regards,
Robert

Home Page loads slowly because of too many show/hide images.

I was asked to create a home page that displayed the correct product image in the background as you mouse over the menu item in the product portfolio navigation. I built the page using quite a few show/hide behaviors displaying the correct image. Now I have a HUGE home page that loads very slowly. Is there a better way to accomplish the same affect or do I need to scrap this idea and keep the images on the individual pages?
You can see this page here: http://www.keystonewalls.com
(mouseover the PRODUCT PORTFOLIO button and scroll down the menu to see the affect)
The client loves the fact that you don't have to leave the home page to get a good idea of what each product looks like but they aren't happy with how long it takes to load.
Help!

Yup. You've got some trimming to do.
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/
On a T1 connection (1.41 MB/sec) your home page takes 18.50 seconds to load. For dial-ups it's a very painful 395 seconds.
Page size: 1,943,483 bytes. Should be closer to 200 KB.
HTTP server requests: 41. This should be around 10.
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb

Stick Show/Hide Dock Status with each Space ?

Hi,
I'd like to save the Show/Hide status of the Dock with each and every Space, so that for example I can always see the Dock on Space 1 where I have my Mail, iChat, iCal and other apps which use their Dock icons to notify me of new events, but I never want to see it on Space 3 or 4 where I only have Aperture or Logic on my entire screen.
Then I wouldn't have to press commandoptionD to show or hide the Dock each time after switching to a different Space.
Is that somehow possible ?
Thanks !

Hi,
I'd like to save the Show/Hide status of the Dock with each and every Space, so that for example I can always see the Dock on Space 1 where I have my Mail, iChat, iCal and other apps which use their Dock icons to notify me of new events, but I never want to see it on Space 3 or 4 where I only have Aperture or Logic on my entire screen.
Then I wouldn't have to press commandoptionD to show or hide the Dock each time after switching to a different Space.
Is that somehow possible ?
Thanks !

Create navigation iviews to show differents documents from the same folder

Does any body knows how can i create navigations iviews that show differents documents from the same folder? This is my situation i have a folder that include documents for diferents countries, i want create a navigation iview that show only the documents for Canada from this folder.

The only other option is to give user access using taxonomy. But it seems like a lot of extra work to keep documents in the same directory. anyway, here is the overview of steps:
1. create index (SA > System Configuration > Knowledge Mgmnt > Index Administration)
2. create categories within the taxonomy.
3. define Query on each category. (Content Management > Classification > Taxonomy Query Builder)
4. create property: property namespace, property group. (SA > System Configuration > Knowledge Mgmnt > Content Mgmnt > Global Services > Property Metadata)
5. <b>assign props to the docs.</b>
6. Schedule the crawler to create classification index.
7. classify docs so that docs actually go recide in the categories
<b>8. Create role, page and KM Navigation iViews for end user to browse the taxonomy instead of going directly to the repository.</b>
9. restrict permissions on the taxonomy for different user groups.
Kumar

Show/Hide Permissions on the upload iview

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for