04 inspection for order receive
hi experts
first,sorry to say that,because there is no qm forum in sdn,so i put my qm problem here
i have set the inspection type '04' for the material and when i receive goods for my production order using mb31,here comes a problem 'change the inspection stock of material xxx in qm only', well,i don't why,i think a lot should be created when order receiving,does anyone know the reason
details as follows:
Change the inspection stock of material xxx in QM only
Message no. QA495
Diagnosis
You want to make a stock posting to/from the inspection stock. This is not allowed for material xxx because the quality inspection control has been activated by QM.
The following cases can occur:
The inspection stock should be increased, although an inspection is not foreseen for the current goods movement
The inspection stock should be released, although you can only do this using the QM transactions.
System Response
You cannot carry out the stock posting.
Procedure
Check both the QM inspection setup data and the movement type for material 101001 in the quality management view of the material master.
Exception:
If you post a return delivery to a vendor with reference to a purchase order, or cancel a goods receipt, the stock indicator from the order is proposed.
Check and modify this proposal as required.
The stock may have been transferred already and is therefore no longer in inspection stock.
best regards
zlf
Hi,
As you have maintained the key 04 in the material master QM view for inspection type, when you confirmed the Order, the material was posted to Quality Stock & an inspection lot was created. You may follow below given proccedure -
1) Check whether the material requires the inspection plan as per settings in the material master QM view for inspection type 04 (Inspect with Task List & Check Char). If this is required, then check whether you have created inspection plan for key date befor that of Production Order Confirmation. If the inspection plan is not maintaintained, then maintain the same for the key date equal to at least before that of Production Order COnfirmation.
2) Go to transaction Code QA02. Select your inspection lot for the amterial (lot origin 04). If the lot status is CRTD, then assign the inspection plan manually & calculate the sample manually.
3) Go to transaction QE51N (inspection origin 04) & record the inspection results.
4) Go to usage decision / stock posting in transaction QA11. Select your inspection lot & then take usage decision & in the stock posting tab, make stock posting as per your requirement.
Regards,
Prashant
Similar Messages
-
Best ecommerce plug in for order tracking
I created a site for a client who is currently only receiving
orders by email/mail and payment by personal check.
We want upgrade the site, add a shopping cart with payment
via Paypal, with USPS shipping costs calculated based on total
dollar amount...
i.e.,
$.01 to $100 = $5
$101 to $250 = $7
$251 and up = $10
with an option to ship 2-day express mail for addtitional $10
and 5% tax for orders received from one particular state
Also, we want to be able to show if an item is out of stock
when added to cart, and allow the customer to check an order status
by inputting an order #
What's the best third-party plug in that could handle this?
Thanks in advanceoops.. I added some additional info about Apple Loops in the previous post
All new audio files that has been recorded with Logic allow you to use transpose function
About Audio streaching method used in Logic search on th Logic manual chapter 23 page 525
Also search for Time Machine
it works fine! -
Early Inspection for a Goods Receipt for production order
Dear Experts,
This is with respect Early Inspection for a Goods Receipt for inspction type 04.( 03 is also active in material master)
We made partial confirmation 250 qty for production order using t code co11n ( total qty of production order is 1000).
made the usage decision with an acceptance and posted all open stocks. to unrestricted.
Now in second partial confirmation prodn order of 250 qty was made . This suppose to be rejected . but sytem will add this 250 qty directly to unrestricted stock . how to over come this .
Regards
SandeepDon't make the UD until all stock has been receipted?
You basically approved the batch. So why wouldn't the system put the stock to unrestricted?
Why would you make a UD when you still have stock to be posted anyway? You can post stock without without making a UD so why not just post some if you need it, and wait on making the UD?
Craig -
What is the deadline for ordering iPhoto Calendars to receive before Christmas?
Each year the deadline for ordering print products via iPhoto (e.g. calendars, books) is communicated on the print products page but nothing is there yet.
Does anybody what is the deadline to receive a calendar before Christmas?
Thank youNo
Only users exactly like you here
and the answer will be partially based on the shipping method you choose and where you are located
LN -
Goods Received Valuation for Order Delivery
Dear Experts,
In our business process planned order is created through project system. planned order is converted in to production order. while receiving finished goods throgh production order .
for exmple: production order 1:
In finished good A with moving avg price is Rs150
for this we use raw material B Rs 120
labour & machine Rs 20
toatl production cost is Rs 140
while goods receiving the production order credited with Rs 140.
For same material again we created one more Production order with another planned order.
production order 2:
In finished good A with moving avg price is Rs150
for this we use raw material B Rs 140
labour & machine Rs 20
toatl production cost is Rs 160
while goods receiving the production order2 credited with Rs 140. which is previous production order1 cost.
our client wants to credit production2 with Rs 160.
this credit posting Rs 140 is taken for all production order which is created to mateial finished good A.
Define Goods Received Valuation for Order Delivery here i assigned the valuation varient to the plant.
Is there any configuration for this apart from the valuation type V in the Material Master.
Please help on this. I will be grateful for all of you.
Thanks and Regards
RajuHi
The situation you are describing is a standard behaviour... SAP documentation states that in MTO scenario, your price from 1st goods receipt is used to valuate the subsequent Goods receipts
I think, both of your production orders pertain to the same project.... Correct me if i am wrong plz...
If you create another project, 140 will not be used... System will use the price from the 1st goods receipt of that project
This behaviour is controlled by requirement class settings. Check what requirement class you are using and see what all valuation settings have you made there.. especially in fields "Valuation" and "Without valuation strategy"
Refer the following path in SAP library or help.sap.com
- Controlling > Product Cost Controlling > Cost Obj Contr > Product Cost by sales order > Valuated sales order stock > Std price with valuated sales order stock
This appllies to both sales order stock and project stock
This explanation is very detailed and comprehensive... Believe me, these settings are extremely influential and must be done with utmost care.... Understand this documentation well b4 doing the settings
Regards
Ajay M -
SAP QM Inprocess Inspection for a specific Process order type
Dear All,
There is a requirement. As no QM type is maintained for FG material in a plant. Now the requirement is there is a specific order type for which Inprocess Inspection is to be activated for all the FG materials. But at the same tie for all other order types there won't be any inspection for the same set of FG material.
I tried creation Z03 by copying 03 inspection type. But the problem is source inspection is from Production. So Z03 is not confined to only the specific process order but instead it is generating inspection lot for other Process order also.
Is it possible to create a scenario where we can attach inprocess inspection to a specific order type only.
Regards,
RahulHi,
You can assign the in process inspection to Order type in SPRO as shown below in the process order type dependent parameters in Planning tab in COR4.
Check and revert..
Thanks
Kumar -
In process inspection for partial confirmation of production order
Hi QM Guru,
how i will do in process inspection for partial confirmation of production oder
Senior is this I have maintain inspection type 03 in finish material u2026..suppose production order quantity 20 kg..there are 2 operationu202610 and 20.. I have maintained MIC on operation 20u2026after release the production order lot are generatingu2026but when they confirm operation 10 they do partial confirmation for 10 kgu2026.then again when do confirmation 20..they checku2026for quality resultu2026
Then I do the result record ok of 10 kgu2026then they confirm 20 operationu2026.
Now. again he do the confirmation of rest production order 10 kg..opration 10 ok..but in operation 20..system does not check for qualityu2026..
Again I want to do the quality inspection of 10kg on 20 operationu2026
How I will do. kindly suggest me
Regards
AqueelHello
I think that the process can be mapped in one of these ways:
- according to what you describe this is closer to a good receipt inspection and not to in-process inspection, as the trigger for the inspection is the GR and not the release of the order. So, why dont you give a chance to a 04 inspection type, with inspection lot creation for every GR ? Check the indictor in MM02, QM view for "04" inspection, and uncheck the "Stock in quality", so you dont get caught by the stock in quality and resembles in process "Non-stock relevant" inspection
- alternatively you can define the use of inspection points ? So you are adding new results as new confirmations are made. Disadvantage: you can only give one usage decision to the inspection Lot, irrespective of the number of samples you have analyzed.
Regards -
Issue of Quality Inspection for consignment return delivery
Hello,
I am doing a returns delivery(from a Sales Order) from a Customer Consignment.
I am getting a error when I do a Post Goods Receipt(PGI). QM is active for that material.
The error I am getting is
"Change the inspection stock of material XXX in QM only"
Procedure says
"Check both the QM inspection setup data and the movement type for material XXX in the quality management view of the material master"
The movement type used in the returns delivery is 655(GD returns for QI).
What is the solution for this error. Do I need to change/add new Inspection type based on the Movement type?
Please let me know ASAP.
Thanks
Regards
SAP Fan..Hi,
You can read this link for inspection for customer return [Inspection for customer return|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/92/b808b1d52a11d2962200a0c930e04c/frameset.htm]
It looks the material master is set-up inspection type with 06 - returns from customer. Also the movement type 655 moves the goods into QI stock. In this case, the Quality personnel needs to change the inspection stock type using transaction code QA32. They will change the usage decision on the customer returns.
Once the change the inspection type is changed, you can do the post goods receipt.
Regards -
Early batch opening for order item is activated in the QM data settings
Hi Team
I am not able to generate inspection lot inspite maintaining 04 inspection type in QM view.
Getting this message - ( Make sure that an inspection type for inspection lot origin (03) or for inspection lot origin 04 with
early batch opening for order item is activated in the QM inspection data. )
Please suggest me required settings.
ThanksHi
Go to MM02 select the QM view
Clcik the inspection setup button
Select the inspection type 04 detail icon in right corner.
in that screen Control insLot field select the Y Early lot creation for the order item.
Save
Thanks
S.Murali -
QM inspection for movement 321 and 322
Dear guru,
Presently there is one new requirement from our business wanting us to create an inspection type that will allow for users to use movement type 321 & 322 through MIGO.
Because the standard SAP setup (i.e. SPRO QM Quality Inspection Inspection Lot Creation Inspection for Goods Movement) for movement type 321 and 322 are not tied to any inspection lot origin, further, if I will to use u201Dcopy..asu201D method or hit create New method, the inspection lot origin field box is grey out and not allow input of inspection lot origin.
May I know how to resolve this issue? Or 321 and 322 should not involve QM? or other?
Thanks.
TuffTuffy,
What I have understood is, I try to re quote the same.
1. Your declare production and stock goes to quality inspection with 04 inspection type
2. You clear this inspection lot and post the stock to unrestricted use through QA32 / QA12
3. Now you want to reverse the production movement.
4. System doesnu2019t allow you to reverse this and throws error as u201CDeficit of stock in qualityu201D
5. If you try to cancel 321 material document system throws error as u201CMaterial document cannot be processedu201D
If above is the scenario then perhaps you have following 2 options
1. Document specific reversal
a. You need to implement SAP Note 175842
b. As a result of which you get a program in system, give inspection lot as reference.
c. System reverses the stock and posts back to quality inspection
d. Now if you try to cancel 101 material document (production reversal) through MBST, system will allow you.
2. Without document specific
a. Go to MB31
b. Input production order and opt for 102 movement.
c. Enter
d. Select the stock type as unrestricted. (default it would be X i.e. quality inspection)
Under ideal circumstances the need to use any of above options shouldnu2019t arise. If requirement is the production reversal, I think to stop inspection lot creation or use of MIGO / MB1B would not work as this eliminates the utilization of QM module.
Regards,
Anand Rao -
SAP PM : Unprocessed future change recs for order number : Error Message 688
Dear Experts
I received the following message when trying to close a PM order.
Unprocessed future change recs for order number prevent del. flag/c - Error Message 688
Kindly advise on the steps to be taken to resolve the above error.
Thanking you in advance for your assistance.
Regards
BarryHi Barry,
Please find below thread for your reference.
Error message when business completion of a production maintenance order
Unprocessed future change recs for order prevent del. flag/completion
Regards
Terence -
Why we create settlement profile. What master data must exist in sap before creating settlement profile for order.
As mentioned above, settlement is to post the cost to cost centers or any possible receivers as per the settlement profile. PM / Service orders, WBS elements, etc., can be temporary cost bearers from which cost should be settled to some permanent receivers.
Cost elements / Cost element groups should be available as Master data before configuring settlement profile.
To answer your latest query, there are 2 type of cost centers.
Sender Cost Center - Against this, labor / internal activity price will be maintained in KP26. This cost center will be maintained in PM / PP work centers. While creating PM / PP orders, one of the work centers & activity types will be mentioned. Based on the KP26 entry for the combination of Activity type & Sender cost center, price will be picked & calculated according to work hours / labor hours maintained in PM / PP orders.
Receiver Cost Center - Receiver cost center is the department / location cost center to which cost should be settled. Only receiver cost center will be maintained in settlement profile. Sender cost centers will be picked up automatically from work center. -
QM In-Process Inspection for Batch Managed Material
Hi,
I have a issue related to UD of In-Process inspection for batch managed material. The production process is discrete manufacting for a cold rolling mill. A production order can have mutiple coils as per the production amount. To track the individual coil , batch management has ben activated. We have both in-process as well as inspection after production here.
For inspection after production we are fine as we are doing partial confirmation after every coil and have separate inspection lot having different batch number.
But for in-process I can have only one inspection lot for the production order (created on release of the production order). I can do the result recording but while trying to do UD u2013 it is asking for a batch number as the material is batch managed. W/o entering the batch number system is not allowing me to do the UD.
Is there any solution/work around of this problem.
-Regards
ashimHi Ashim,
you raised a very good question? i am helpless here to execute same scenario,
but i disussed with my QM guy here, he said, once the material is batch managed then it has to ahve batch in UD.
so i discussed ur case, which is very much valid for heavy ind like cement and all,
so what i suggest, u create a dummy batch in the UD for in process (no inventory posting)
and at confimation give ur usual batch (if system propose the dummy batch which u give in the UD for inprocess, try to change there--- i hope it should allow)
i would really like to here answer from u for this.
try to do as suggested, and let me know the results.
REgards,
Pravin mukkawar -
Double inpeocess inspection for a operation
Dear All,
I am using in-process inspection for process order. In order i have 10 phases. At 7th phase i have applied one purification process and inprocess inspection for Impurities. If the impurity is present i carry 8th phase process of purification, and if then also impurity present the i carry 9th phase of purification. All these processes are already maintained in master recipe, so by default that will copy to process order.
Now my question is that, if in 7th phase of purification my impurity % is OK, then i have no need to carry other two 8th and 9th phase. If 7th is OK then user don,t want to confirm 8th and 9th phase. And material consumption is also depend on that. For evert stage 100 L solvent is required. But my confirmation is against PI sheet. What i can do to map this in system.
Thanks and Regards,
Harriesh.Dear All,
I am using in-process inspection for process order. In order i have 10 phases. At 7th phase i have applied one purification process and inprocess inspection for Impurities. If the impurity is present i carry 8th phase process of purification, and if then also impurity present the i carry 9th phase of purification. All these processes are already maintained in master recipe, so by default that will copy to process order.
Now my question is that, if in 7th phase of purification my impurity % is OK, then i have no need to carry other two 8th and 9th phase. If 7th is OK then user don,t want to confirm 8th and 9th phase. And material consumption is also depend on that. For evert stage 100 L solvent is required. But my confirmation is against PI sheet. What i can do to map this in system.
Thanks and Regards,
Harriesh. -
ATP for Order Create vs Order Release
In SAP there is an option for different ATP checks when creating a production order and when releasing a production order. I'm not sure I understand the behavior we are seeing in our system. Could be I have a fundamental misunderstanding of the functionality.
In our configuration, ATP for production order create takes into consideration open purchase orders. ATP for order release does not. When I go into CO06/CO09 using the checking rule for order create, I see the commitments which include the open purchase order quantities. When I go in using the checking rule for order release, my expectation is that the commitments for the purchase order quantities will not be there. Nonetheless, those commitments appear. I'm receiving missing parts when I'm trying to release a production order even though there is sufficient material not committed to released production orders.
I hope that makes sense. Any guidance would be appreciated.Yes. We have a different checking rule in OPJK for production order create (YO) and one for production order release (YP). YO includes purchase orders as a supply element in the check and YP does not. Other than that, they are identical.
I am saying that when looking at CO09 with YP, I saw commitments based on purchase orders.
Purchase orders are a supply element.
MD04 - 18,606 on hand. Order reservations for 1,512, 9,329, and 709 are for released orders. The order reservations for 18,657 and 23,322 are for created orders.
CO09 - Checking Rule YO. Because of purchase order for 45,000, all quantities are confirmed.
CO09 - Checking rule YP. All quantities still confirmed.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Newbie - Linking to a specific topic
Hello, I just got RoboHelp 7 today and a bit lost. Here is my issue. I'm an App Dev Project manager. I came onto a project that has an application that links to a RoboHelp project. All links within the application send the user to the default.htm. Wh
-
How to get better resolution on Blu-ray (1080/60i)
I'm experimenting with my new AG-AC160A camcorder and have been shooting youth hockey games in AVCHD mode, 1080/60i, 1/120 shutter, manual gain and white balance set appropriately, and florescent scene file setting due to lighting in rink. I have PP
-
Notificati​on usage
This may be an obvious question, but I've been unable to find an answer in the forums. I'm using a Teststand Rendezvous with the batch process model. I cannot find a way to recover if one of the batch sockets fails before the Rendezvous is reached. F
-
Ipod nano (3rd Generation) Screen
I have had my iPod for almost 2 years and this morning I went to use it and it looks like there is a fingerprint in the middle of the screen along with random black lines. The iPod still plays, but am concerned about the screen.
-
A report showing all cancelled TO
Hi, Delivery # 0080103253 deleted from SAP without canceling TO # 6000005466 Just wonder Is there a report showing all cancelled TO? Or what table that I can check? Any question is that how to cancel TO when delivery already cancelled while the Inven