1099 payments are not combined for same vendor payments

Hi All
I have a question on 1099 reporting.
My issue is that we are running the report in transaction code ‘s_p00_07000134’ separately by company code because all these company codes have separate tax ids except few of them which have same tax ids. My client wants to run them (ccodes with same tax ids) together and if there is a same vendor  on these company codes . They are being shown on the report separately and the 1099 forms are printing separately.
Can’t the system combine the payments for same vendors under different company codes with same tax ids run together/
Please help me…..

Hello,
Did you get the answer for this problem?  Could you please explain how did you resolve it?
Thanks

Similar Messages

  • Payments are not allowed for business unit ..... (6000,568)

    Hello,
    Did anyone ever have the same error message 'Payments are not allowed for business unit (6000,568)' so that he can tell me what I did wrong?
    I get this message when I click on 'add' on the regular or epress deposit pages
    I have set up the payment options at BU Level so I have no idea what to do know.
    Regards,
    Stijn

    I forgot to creae the group type P ....

  • Baseline date & Payment terms are not populating for Intercomany vendor

    Hi,
    When we post intercompany invoice & check the vendor line items in FBL1N,it is expected to have data payment terms & Baseline date from the posted Invoice.this is occuring fime with single company but this data is blank for Intercompany which is creating issues for further steps.
    Anybody has faced such issue? What may be the resolution?

    Hello,
    Why are you directly executing these programs?
    You will not expect these program to execute directly by going to SE38.
    I would have configured the relevant payment methods in the country with DME structure or classical RFFO* programs, which in turn pick up the inherent programs at the time of running F110.
    For example, if you need to generate BACS file for country GB, either you copy the GB_BACS to ZGB_BACS or use GB_BACS directly in FBZP settings.
    Make sure that you have maintained OBPM1 / OBPM2 / OBPM3 and OBPM4 settings properly.
    The system automatically gives the access to system RFFOAVIS_FPAYM. Prepare a variant against this program in F110. Relevant file gets generated to folder path mentioned in OBPM4 will get generated. The file get generated can be seen in AL11.
    Hope this is informative and solves your issue.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Document splitting not working for customer & vendor Payment

    Hi,
    We have actived Document splitting on profit center for segment level reporting.
    In below scanario Document spliting working fine.
    Vendor Invoice (Docuement type - KR)
    General Ledger view
    Expense Dr 1000      PC1
    Vendor   Cr  1000     PC1
    At the time of Payment (General ledger view) (Document Type - KZ)
    Vendor Dr  1000        PC1
    Bank     Cr   1000       PC1
    In the above scanario we dont have any issue, Based on invoice profit center spliting automaticlly in bank in General Ledgerview.
    How ever in the below scanario Document spliting is not working in payment
    No issues in Invoice
    General ledger view
    Exp  Dr  1000 PC1
    Exp Dr   1500 PC2
    Vendor Cr 1000 PC1
    Vendor Cr 1500 PC2
    When we make payment to vendor Document splitting is not working, it get splitting in zero balance clearing account
    vendor Dr 1000 PC1
    Vendor Dr 1500 PC2
    Bank     Cr  2500  (No profit Center)
    Doc splitt A/C 1000
    Doc Split A/C  1000 PC1
    Doc Split A/C   1500
    Doc Split A/C    1500 PC2
    My Finance Team requires automatic split up in bank based on vendor profit center.
    We are using Business Transation 1000 (Payment) for document Type - KZ & DZ.
    Regards,
    Lokesh

    Can you please confirm if the following settings exist in your system in various IMG nodes.
    1. Bank G/L account is assigned to item category 04000 (IMG node: Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting).
    2. Document type KZ is assigned to business transaction 1000 and transaction variant 0001 (IMG node: Classify Document Types for Document Splitting).
    3. In IMG Node "Define Document Splitting Rule", under the method that is assigned to your company code, transaction 1000 and variant 0001, you see 04000 as one of the item categories to be edited.
    4. If the answer for (3) above is yes, if you double-click on 04000 item category line, the processing category is set to 1 (Splitting based on base item categories).
    5. Now when you double-click on 'Base item categories', you see 03000 - Vendor as one of the base item categories in the list there.
    Please respond with Y / N to the above questions and we can go from there.

  • F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

    Hello,
    Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
    I understand that there are two places:
    FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
    Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
    Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
    In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
    I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
    Thanks everyone.

    Ravi,
    Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
    In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
    1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
    2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
    3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
    4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
    Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
    That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
    Comments please?

  • RSA3 data in R/3 and PSA data in BI are different values for same Doc No.

    Hello BI experts,
    I have a weird situation in BI.  RSA3 and PSA are not reconciled for same Doc no.
    Data Source: 0FI_AR_4 (enhanced in user exit with some custom fields as well)
    Extracting data using Infopakcage in BI as a Init load into PSA.
    The values in RSA3 in R/3
    Doc No           Amount
    1400003125      714.29
    The values in PSA in BI
    Doc No           Amount
    1400003125     581.56
    Anyone come across this situation.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks much,
    Anil

    1. yes selections are same in RSA3 and in Infopackage
    2. Yes pulling all data records in RSA3.  Thats only record exits for that doc#
    3. Its not a delta, we are pulling in RSA3 all records and Initial load  to PSA.
    Thanks much,
    Anil

  • Payment method(s) are not allowed for this program / Program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM

    Dear Friends,
    In Se38  abap editor, I entered the program RFFOM100, i entered the details program run date,identification future,paying company code,payment methods T, House bank, Account Id and executed the program. I am getting the error 'Payment method(s) are not allowed for this program'.
    Payment method S is not used in F110, It was not mentioned in vendor master or vendor invoice.It is not mentioned in fbzp in bank determination. When i tried to delete payment method 'S' the system shows a message Payment Method S is being used in the company code.
    In  the program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM, i entered the details program run date,identification future,paying company code,payment methods T, House bank, Account Id and executed the program. I am getting the error  'Program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM: No records selected'. But there open items or invoices.
    Please suggest how to resolve the errors.
    Regards
    Sridhar

    Hello,
    Why are you directly executing these programs?
    You will not expect these program to execute directly by going to SE38.
    I would have configured the relevant payment methods in the country with DME structure or classical RFFO* programs, which in turn pick up the inherent programs at the time of running F110.
    For example, if you need to generate BACS file for country GB, either you copy the GB_BACS to ZGB_BACS or use GB_BACS directly in FBZP settings.
    Make sure that you have maintained OBPM1 / OBPM2 / OBPM3 and OBPM4 settings properly.
    The system automatically gives the access to system RFFOAVIS_FPAYM. Prepare a variant against this program in F110. Relevant file gets generated to folder path mentioned in OBPM4 will get generated. The file get generated can be seen in AL11.
    Hope this is informative and solves your issue.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Payment order are not defined for extended withholding  tax

    Hi Gurus,
    Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
    Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
    In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
    Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
    I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
    any help is welcome

    The payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
    For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
    methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
    no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
    The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
    however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
    Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
    FBZP.
    Best regards,
    Leonardo Vedovelli
    FI Support Engineer
    SAP Active Global Support

  • Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor: GRN error

    Dear All,
    We have upgraded our Ecc 6.0 system to latest  application SAPKH60016 ( SAP_APPL ). WHile testing the system, for import GR's we are getting error saying Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor. J1ID is also maintained & previously we have received lot of GR's for the same vendor. No changes have been done to Vendor & CIN master.
    Please let me know if any note or object to be updated to correct this error.
    Thanks
    Raghavendra.

    hiii
    Can u tel me where exactly the excise range was missing ??
    Because if excise range is missing , it won't throw this lind of error .
    U have found any other???????
    Thnaks
    SAP-MM

  • Automatic Payment program: Payment method not defined for vendor abroad

    Hi All,
    I have a situation wherein the client has a company code in Poland . The Company code is trying to make a payment via f110 to a vendor based in sweden. The vendor wants payment to the invoice to be made in Polish Currency i.e. it wants clearing to be done in Company codes local currency.
    But F110 is throwing the error Payment method not defined for vendor abroad. Can you suggest what could be the possible Error.
    Regards
    Nitin

    Nitin,
    Have you followed the above advice, i.e. used the same medium format just allowing foreign payments for it?
    AFAIK, the Poland banks require a separate format for foreign payments, if only because international bank nbr SWIFT has to also be given and not just the IBAN.
    At my company, the Deutsche Bank Poland requested IDocs to be set up instead, I'm working on it now..
    thanks

  • Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000000957.

    Hi,
      As per our regular process  we are capturing inovie with J1IEX  and doing GR in MB01   now i have captured  invoice in J1IEX  and while making GR with MIGO i am getting error
    Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000000957. ,  but when i am making GR with MB01 i am not getting any error.
    also what configuration required to capture excise invoice and make Gr in MIGO,  as capture excise invoice menu is not coming in MIGO  in MIGO Exicse tab i can only see  only  refer excise invoice  ,  only part1 , no exicse registration.
    regards,
    zafar

    Hi,
    Do proper setings in Logistics - General -Tax on Goods Movements -India -Basic Settings -Maintain Excise Groups  - select your excise group and check settings in MIGO Settings such as EI Capture, Post EI in MIGO, Duty different at GR.
    Also ensure that you have maintained excise details for Vendor and Material in J1ID.
    Regards,
    Vikas

  • Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor,  Message no. 8I565;

    Hi Gurus,
    We have up-graded system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0, Now encountering following error while capturing Excise at MIGO.
    Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000202040. Message no. 8I565;
    Kindly suggest a solution for the above error.
    Best regards
    Naveen D'Souza

    Hello ,
    Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor 0000202040. Message no. 8I565
    The above given error is common while MIGO while capture of excise invoice. The above written guys are correct, please check J1ID for that Vendor,
    1) if after maintening also , suppose you get the above error while MIGO, then select "Only Part1" option in MIGO , and press Check Button, if error goes,
    then again go back and select "Capture excise invoice", then system will not give you the above error while Capture of excise invoice in MIGO.
    Please check some SAPOSS notes also.
    Regards
    Mahesh Naik.

  • Reg msg "Payment method(s) are not allowed for this program".

    Hi...
    I am copying a standard program RFFOES_T (Print program for bank transfer) into a custom program. When i try to execute the custom program it gives me a msg saying
    "Payment method(s) are not allowed for this program".
    Can you please Provide a solution for this problem.
    Regards,
    Indira.

    Indira,
    1.RFFOES_T is using Logical database PYF.Seems you have copied it as it is without changing the attributes of the program.
    2.As it is using logical database PYF  it needs to be tagged to the respective payment methods in FBZP settings as below
    FBZP
    >>Payment methods in Country
    >> in the next screen click on position and give the company code and payment method
    >> in the next screen select the corresponding payment method and click on the details(ctrlshiftf2) ie magnifying glass icon
    >>in the next screen  within  Payment Medium you will get to see two radio buttons as Payment medium workbench(uses DMEE tree structure)  and payment medium programs (uses the standard prog).Here in Payment medium Program either the standard prog or your zprogram should be tagged otherwise you will get the error message as you mentioned.
    3.Once you tag the program in the FBZP setting to the respective payment methods,after the payment run you will be able to run the program.
    4.If you don't want the program to be linked to FBZP settings then as far as my knowledge is concerned you need to avoid using logical database PYF and change the entire code using the regular database tables like reguh,regup,bkpf,bseg etc.(I think this should be the best approach)
    Thanks,
    K.Kiran.

  • Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax

    Hi Gurus,
    Would you please help me with the message below:
    Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
    In my company  payment orders are created in F110  for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
    Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
    I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
    any help is welcome !
    TREAD LOCKED SINCE IT IS DUPLICATED FROM THREAD payment order are not defined for extended withholding  tax

    Hi,
    On the analysis,  the system expects an entry in the T059Q table with
    code as XX.
    The reason being in the extended withholding tax we use multiple
    witholding tax codes and these entries are stored in the table
    with_item. And in BSEG we populate the field withholding tax code i.e.
    BSEG-QSSKZ  with the value 'XX'. In classical withholding tax we used to
    store the code directly which is not possible with Extended withholding
    tax.
    As the field BSEG-QSSKZ refers to the values in the table T059Q-QSSKZ
    the entry 'XX" needed in this table for the corresponding country of the
    company code to maintain the correct relationship and consistent
    database information.
    Hence for the statistical purpose and for the internal calculations we
    need an entry in the table T059Q. Could you please maintain this code
    i.e. 'XX' also in the table T059Q in a test system? Then retest your issue.
    This should resolve your issue.
    Kind Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Configuration for consolidated check for same vendor from different company

    Hi All,
    My company is trying to print a single check for same vendor with same vendor number in multiple company code.
    The Automatic payment parameters has all company codes where the vendor is having open items.
    But when payment run is carried out and the check is printed, there are more than 1 check printed for the same vendor corresponding to the cleared invoices.
    One company is paying for all other companies and still multiple checks are printed.
    Can someone help with some lead to resolve this issue.
    Points will be assigned for helpful tips and answers.
    Thanks alot in advance

    Hi,
    i understood ur problem so dont worry.... solution is there in sap
    while confiqure automatic payment program in FBZP give paying company code payment transaction give company code what check through you want to pay that ....ofter that payment will go through this company code check only
    may be this information is useful to you

Maybe you are looking for