11 -- 11,1 Upgrade: pkg://solaris/system/library signature problems?

Hi all,
I have a vanilla 11 11/11 lab system (x64, in VirtualBox) that I've tried to upgrade to 11.1:
# uname -a
SunOS alpha 5.11 11.0 i86pc i386 i86pc
# pkg list entire
NAME (PUBLISHER) VERSION IFO
entire 0.5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0 i--
# pkg publisher
PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI
solaris origin online http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release/
It has full connectivity to the Internet, and I've tried pointing it to the public release repo, a local 11.1 repo that has had the update ISO injected into it, and with a single loopback repo pointing to only the upgrade ISO (sol-11_1-upgrade-repo.iso, md5 verified). In all 3 cases I get this at the first stage of the upgrade:
# pkg update
Creating Plan |
pkg update: A signature in pkg://solaris/system/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.10.1.0.0:20120918T164707Z could not be verified for this reason:
The signature value did not match the expected value. Res: 0
The signature's hash is 235c7674d821032ae3eeda280c7837d1f1f4fdb5
I must be missing something simple, because I can't imagine a bad signature in the public or upgrade-ISO repos. Any ideas?
Thanks!

If possible, please file a support request for this issue through the My Oracle Support portal so that the details of the issue can be captured.
With that said, executing the following commands may provide a viable workaround:
pkg set-property signature-policy=ignore
pkg set-publisher --set-property signature-policy=ignore solaris
Once the above commands have been executed, attempt the pkg update again. If successful, then after rebooting to the new boot environment, reset the properties as follows:
pkg unset-property signature-policy
pkg set-publisher --unset-property signature-policy                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Similar Messages

  • Solaris 8 x86 system refuses to upgrade to Solaris 9

    My x86 system successfully runs Solaris 8 (Feb. 2000 revision A) but refuses to upgrade to Solaris 9. When trying to boot one of the installation cds in anyone of the installation modes, the boot process proceeds till the message "booting kernel/unix, ... use is subject to license terms". Next I would expect setup messages for the network interface, but instead I get a blank screen with a cursor blinking top left, and that's the end of it.
    Well, to be true, it's not really a problem of Solaris 9. The same thing happened when I tried to install a patch set on Solaris 8.
    What ways of diagnosis do I have?
    Is anything in Solaris 8 not upward compatible?
    Thanks in advance for every hint!
    Bernd.

    OK after the DCA scans, it goes to a screen labeled "Boot Solaris" which indicates the boot drive. On that screen f4 is labeled Boot Tasks. Press f4 and go thru the settings to select the boot device and any of the other settings you might want to change. then f3 back to the boot screen and f2 continue. When the boot options screen appears, type in b -r. The DCA should not start up each time after that. To be honest, I had to do this a couple of times before something unknown to me made it finally work. Go figure!
    Lee

  • I can't open .pkg files.  i get an error telling me to choose an application to open them.  the Installer app is not in my Utilities folder or in System/Library/CoreServices.

    i can't open .pkg files.  i get an error telling me to choose an application to open them.  the Installer app is not in my Utilities folder or in System/Library/CoreServices.

    Install the UnArchiver and try again.
    http://wakaba.c3.cx/s/apps/unarchiver
    There is no Installer.app in the Utilities or Applications folder, there is one in the System/Library/CoreServices.
    If yours is not there, then you need to:
    1: Backup your data off the machine to a non-TimeMachine drive and disconnect all drives.
    2: If you have TM, try to restore the Installer.app from the TM drive and reboot. See if things work.
    If the above doesn't work, your going to have to re-install just OS X 10.6 (and bundled programs) from the disk by holding c and booting off the 10.6 disk and simply installing OS X. Then software updating to 10.6.8.
    This will replace all bundled programs and OS X, not touch your files (backup regardless) and most third party programs.
    Some third party programs will have to be reinstalled form original sources because they install Kext files into OS X and thus kicked out by the 10.6 reinstall form disk.
    All should go well, however if you boot to a gray screen or other freeze, reboot holding the shift key down, then update all your third party software to be current to 10.6.8.
    Another method is to re-install in to CoreServices the Installer.app from the 10.6 disk using the extraction program called Pacifist from CharleSoft, then running software update to get any updates for Installer.app.
    http://www.charlessoft.com/

  • When you try to upgrade mac OS 10.6.8. to 10.9. produces an error   System expansion «/ System / Library / Extensions / USBExpressCardCantWake_Huawei.kext» not installed correctly.

    When you try to upgrade mac OS 10.6.8. to 10.9. produces an error   System expansion «/ System / Library / Extensions / USBExpressCardCantWake_Huawei.kext» not installed correctly. What can I do. My friend have this problem and Ihelp to her

    Make sure the Mac can run v10.9 Mavericks >  OS X Mavericks: System Requirements

  • I upgraded iMac to Mountain Lion, and not get:Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAg ent" has been modified and will not be repaired.

    I upgraded to Mountain lion yesterday.  Today I installed a couple of unrelated apps (DaisyDisk, CCleaner) and now when I try to verify/repair permissions I get this:
    Warning: SUID file “System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAg ent” has been modified and will not be repaired.
    Any idea what's going on?  I know that this message sometimes is meaningless, but it bugs me.  LOL  Any help?

    It is meaningless. Do ignore it. Take a look at this. https://support.apple.com/kb/TS1448?locale=da_DK
    Message was edited by: hpr3

  • Upgrade from Solaris 11 Express to Solaris 11 Release(11/11)  ERROR/PROBLEM

    Hi,
    I am getting problems upgrading my Oracle Solaris 11 Express production system to Solaris 11.
    I follow the steps in: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/E24456/upgrade-2.html#scrolltoc
    But I'm stuck in this error message:
    $ pfexec pkg update
    Creating Plan /
    pkg update: No solution was found to satisfy constraints
    Plan Creation: Package solver has not found a solution to update to latest available versions.
    This may indicate an overly constrained set of packages are installed.
    latest incorporations:
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/cde/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.0.0:20110927T191905Z
    pkg://solaris/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0:20111020T143822Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/ips/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.2576:20111020T063559Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/X/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.0.1215:20110927T121319Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/SunVTS/[email protected],5.11-0.172.0.0.0.0.0:20110816T071310Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/nvidia/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.0.0:20110927T192422Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/sunpro/[email protected],5.11-0.174.0.0.0.0.0:20110921T184135Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/osnet/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.1:20111019T053010Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/cns/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.1.0:20111012T230319Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/l10n/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.1.765:20111012T043917Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/gfx/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0:20111019T144752Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/cacao/[email protected],5.11-0.174.0.0.0.0.0:20110921T190516Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/xvm/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0:20111019T144757Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/gnome_l10n/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.0.0:20110927T081833Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/nspg/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0:20111019T144753Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/jdmk/[email protected],5.11-0.173.0.0.0.0.0:20110828T210111Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/sic_team/[email protected],5.11-0.172.0.0.0.0.0:20110816T070737Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/solaris_re/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0:20111019T122734Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/man/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.0.0:20110927T192523Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/install/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.1482:20111019T122620Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/hcts/[email protected],5.11-0.154:20101203T190542Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/vpanels/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.1.778:20111012T230640Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/ub_javavm/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0:20111019T144756Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/gnome/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.0.0:20110927T081825Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/dbtg/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0:20111019T144751Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/sfw/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0:20111019T144754Z
    pkg://solaris/consolidation/admin/[email protected],5.11-0.175.0.0.0.2.0:20111019T144751Z
    Dependency analysis is unable to determine exact cause.
    Try specifying expected results to obtain more detailed error messages.
    What I could do?
    Thanks in advance.

    It was some time ago but I recall getting a similar message when I did the update. If I remember correctly, I had some old OpenSolaris packages installed which I had to remove before I could get the Solaris 11 update to complete. I suspect the old OpenSolaris packages had requirements which were in conflict with the requirements of the newer Solaris 11 release and as a result pkg couldn't find a way to do the update while meeting all of the requirements imposed upon it.

  • After upgrading to Solaris 10 "Can't load the root filesystem" on V245

    I have a Sunfire V245 that was running on Solaris 9 (very stable). I upgraded to Solaris 10 (6/06) this morning and everything seemed to go smoothly. After the upgrade the system rebooted, but will not boot. I get the following uptput;
    Rebooting with command: boot
    Boot device: disk File and args:
    SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_118833-17 64-bit
    Copyright 1983-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Use is subject to license terms.
    pxb_bcm: cannot load driver
    Cannot load drivers for /pci@1e,600000/pci@0/pci@a/pci@0/pci@8/scsi@1/disk@0,0:a
    Can't load the root filesystem
    Type 'go' to resume
    "go" attempts to reboot, but I end up back in the same place.
    Please help.
    Thanks in advanced,
    Craig

    It seems like the driver for that device does not exist. Since the system installed successfully it means that it S10 did find a disk. I wonder if that was a different disk than the default disk. Please boot to the miniroot and check the disk info.

  • OK to use fdisk/100% "SOLARIS System" partition for RAID6 Virtual Drive?

    Solaris newb, here - I am configuring an x4270 with 16 135 GB drives. Basic approach is
    D0, D1: RAID 1 (Boot volume, Solaris, Oracle Software)
    D2-D13: RAID 6 (Oracle dB files)
    D14, D15: global spares
    After configuring the RAID's w/WebBIOS Utility, I am now trying to format/partition the RAID 6 Virtual Drive, which shows up as 1.327 TB 'Optimal' in the MegaRAID Storage Manager. After hunting around the ether for advice on how to do this, I came across http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1459/disksxadd-50.html#disksxadd-54639
    "Creating a Solaris fdisk Partition That Spans the Entire Drive"
    which is painfully simple: after 'format', just do an 'fdisk' and accept the default 100% "SOLARIS System" partition. After doing this, partition>print and prtvtoc show this:
    partition> print
    Current partition table (original):
    Total disk cylinders available: 59125 + 2 (reserved cylinders)
    Part Tag Flag Cylinders Size Blocks
    0 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    1 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    2 backup wu 0 - 59124 1.33TB (59125/0/0) 2849529375
    3 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    4 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    5 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    6 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    7 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    8 boot wu 0 - 0 23.53MB (1/0/0) 48195
    9 unassigned wm 0 0 (0/0/0) 0
    # prtvtoc /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s2
    * /dev/dsk/c0t1d0s2 partition map
    * Dimensions:
    * 512 bytes/sector
    * 189 sectors/track
    * 255 tracks/cylinder
    * 48195 sectors/cylinder
    * 59127 cylinders
    * 59125 accessible cylinders
    * Flags:
    * 1: unmountable
    * 10: read-only
    * Unallocated space:
    * First Sector Last
    * Sector Count Sector
    * 48195 2849481180 2849529374
    * First Sector Last
    * Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
    2 5 01 0 2849529375 2849529374
    8 1 01 0 48195 48194
    My question: is there anything inherently wrong with this default partitioning? Database is for OLTP & fairly small (<200 GB), with about 140 GB being LOB images.
    Thanks,
    Barry

    First off, RAID-5 or RAID-6 is fine for database performance unless you have some REALLY strict and REALLY astronomical performance requirements. Requirements that someone with lots of money is willing to pay to meet.
    You're running a single small x86 box with only onboard storage.
    So no, you're not operating in that type of environment.
    Here's what I'd do, based upon a whole lot of experience with Solaris 10 and not so much with Solaris 11, and also assuming this box is going to be around for a good long time as an Oracle DB server:
    1. Don't use SVM for your boot drives. Use the onboard RAID controller to make TWO 2-disk RAID-1 mirrors. Use these for TWO ZFS root pools. Why two? Because if you use live upgrade to patch the OS, you want to create a new boot environment in a separate ZFS pool. If you use live upgrade to create new boot environments in the same ZFS pool, you wind up with a ZFS clone/snapshot hell. If you use two separate root pools, each new boot environment is a pool-to-pool actual copy that gets patched, so there are no ZFS snapshot/clone dependencies between the boot environments. Those snapshot/clone dependencies can cause a lot of problems with full disk drives if you wind up with a string of boot environments, and at best they can be a complete pain in the buttocks to clean up - assuming live upgrade doesn't mess up the clones/snapshots so badly you CAN'T clean them up (yeah, it has been known to do just that...). You do your first install with a ZFS rpool, then create rpool2 on the other mirror. Each time you do an lucreate to create a new boot environment from the current boot environment, create the new boot environment in the rpool that ISN'T the one the current boot environment is located in. That makes for ZERO ZFS dependencies between boot environments (at least in Solaris 10. Although with separate rpools, I don't see how that could change....), and there's no software written that can screw up a dependency that doesn't exist.
    2. Create a third RAID-1 mirror either with the onboard RAID controller or ZFS, Use those two drives for home directories. You do NOT want home directories located on an rpool within a live upgrade boot environment. If you put home directories inside a live upgrade boot environment, 1) that can be a LOT of data that gets copied, 2) if you have to revert back to an old boot environment because the latest OS patches broke something, you'll also revert every user's home directory back.
    3. That leaves you 10 drives for a RAID-6 array for DB data. 8 data and two parity. Perfect. I'd use the onboard RAID controller if it supports RAID-6, otherwise I'd use ZFS and not bother with SVM.
    This also assumes you'd be pretty prompt in replacing any failed disks as there are no global spares. If there would be significant time before you'd even know you had a failed disk (days or weeks), let alone getting them replaced, I'd rethink that. In that case, if there were space I'd probably put home directories in the 10-disk RAID-6 drive, using ZFS to limit how big that ZFS file system could get. Then use the two drives freed up for spares.
    But if you're prompt in recognizing failed drives and getting them replaced, you probably don't need to do that. Although you might want to just for peace of mind if you do have the space in the RAID-6 pool.
    And yes, using four total disks for two OS root ZFS pools seems like overkill. But you'll be happy when four years from now you've had no problems doing OS upgrades when necessary, with minimal downtime needed for patching, and with the ability to revert to a previous OS patch level with a simple "luactivate BENAME; init 6" command.
    If you have two or more of these machines set up like that in a cluster with Oracle data on shared storage you could then do OS patching and upgrades with zero database downtime. Use lucreate to make new boot envs on each cluster member, update each new boot env, then do rolling "luactivate BENAME; init 6" reboots on each server, moving on to the next server after the previous one is back and fully operational after its reboot to a new boot environment.

  • Constant crash in /System/Library/Extensions/GeForceGLDriver.bundle/Contents/MacOS/GeForceGLDrive r

    I have a 2010 unibody Mac Mini.  It came stock with a 320GB HDD and i have upgraded it to 8GB of Apple approved Kingston RAM.
    The machine worked just fine under Mac OS 10.6.8, could be up for days and days and be perfectly stable.
    Since upgrading to Mac OS X 10.8, i have had constant crashes in Safari, and a bunch of other apps and the only thing really similar between the messages is the following line:
    /System/Library/Extensions/GeForceGLDriver.bundle/Contents/MacOS/GeForceGLDriver
    This error has caused many apps to crash, including but not limited to:
    Safari
    App Store
    VLC
    Quicktime
    PhotoBooth
    Activity Monitor
    Safari seems to be the main culprit, it crashes constantly, i can use it for a bit, then it will crash, sometimes it will crash again directly after re-launch.  There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason. Apps do not quit in a cascading fashion, apps that have previously quit with the same line in the logs have not occured concurrently with other crashes at the same time.  I have created a guest account to test the system and I'm having the same issue globally, so i've managed to mostly rule out my profile.  I have no extentions installed and no plugins other than Flash and Silverlight. There seems to be no direct correlation between the use of either of these plugins when the crashes occur. Removing these plugins does not alleviate the problem.  System can be heavily loaded, or entirely idle.  I've come home from a 12 hour day to find a couple apps have crashed during the time i was gone. 
    App store was the only app running when it crashed.  The only other noteable thing to add is that after the crash occurs, the system will spin up all the connected external drives. I have tried disconnecting all external drives and peripherals and have been met with the same issues.
    Anyone have any thoughts one what may be causing this and how it may be fixed (Short of reinstalling...)?
    Here are some more snippets of console logs...
    Process:         WebProcess [35245]
    Path:            /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/WebKit2.framework/WebProcess.app/Contents/Mac OS/WebProcess
    Identifier:      com.apple.WebProcess
    Version:         8536 (8536.26.14)
    Build Info:      WebKit2-7536026014000000~3
    Code Type:       X86-64 (Native)
    Parent Process:  Safari [35223]
    User ID:         502
    Date/Time:       2012-10-06 08:10:08.599 -0600
    OS Version:      Mac OS X 10.8.2 (12C54)
    Report Version:  10
    Interval Since Last Report:          112 sec
    Crashes Since Last Report:           1
    Per-App Interval Since Last Report:  58 sec
    Per-App Crashes Since Last Report:   1
    Anonymous UUID:                      4ADFE8AC-D5CE-15CF-35F4-1B776B8AC9A5
    Crashed Thread:  0  Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
    Exception Type:  EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
    Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x00000009457732a0
    VM Regions Near 0x9457732a0:
        ATS (font support)     000000014b252000-000000014b253000 [    4K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV 
    -->
        MALLOC_TINY            00007f8101c00000-00007f8101f00000 [ 3072K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV 
    Application Specific Information:
    Bundle controller class:
    SnapshotFetcherBundleController
    Thread 0 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
    0   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8a9c1f28 ***::StringImpl::~StringImpl() + 184
    1   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8ab228aa JSC::JSString::destroy(JSC::JSCell*) + 42
    2   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8ab476ae JSC::MarkedBlock::FreeList JSC::MarkedBlock::sweepHelper<true>(JSC::MarkedBlock::SweepMode) + 398
    3   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8ab474d4 JSC::MarkedBlock::sweep(JSC::MarkedBlock::SweepMode) + 36
    4   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8aaf26cb JSC::Heap::sweep() + 107
    5   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8aaf2875 JSC::Heap::collect(JSC::Heap::SweepToggle) + 245
    6   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8aaf164b JSC::DefaultGCActivityCallbackPlatformData::timerDidFire(__CFRunLoopTimer*, void*) + 315
    7   com.apple.CoreFoundation           0x00007fff896bdda4 __CFRUNLOOP_IS_CALLING_OUT_TO_A_TIMER_CALLBACK_FUNCTION__ + 20
    8   com.apple.CoreFoundation           0x00007fff896bd8bd __CFRunLoopDoTimer + 557
    9   com.apple.CoreFoundation           0x00007fff896a3099 __CFRunLoopRun + 1513
    10  com.apple.CoreFoundation           0x00007fff896a26b2 CFRunLoopRunSpecific + 290
    11  com.apple.HIToolbox                0x00007fff928c90a4 RunCurrentEventLoopInMode + 209
    12  com.apple.HIToolbox                0x00007fff928c8e42 ReceiveNextEventCommon + 356
    13  com.apple.HIToolbox                0x00007fff928c8cd3 BlockUntilNextEventMatchingListInMode + 62
    14  com.apple.AppKit                   0x00007fff8bb27613 _DPSNextEvent + 685
    15  com.apple.AppKit                   0x00007fff8bb26ed2 -[NSApplication nextEventMatchingMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue:] + 128
    16  com.apple.AppKit                   0x00007fff8bb1e283 -[NSApplication run] + 517
    17  com.apple.WebCore                  0x00007fff8a2e9e0f WebCore::RunLoop::run() + 63
    18  com.apple.WebKit2                  0x00007fff8890ac8a WebKit::WebProcessMain(WebKit::CommandLine const&) + 2586
    19  com.apple.WebKit2                  0x00007fff888d25bd WebKitMain + 285
    20  com.apple.WebProcess               0x0000000102394e7b 0x102394000 + 3707
    21  libdyld.dylib                      0x00007fff8cb447e1 start + 1
    Process:         App Store [35301]
    Path:            /Applications/App Store.app/Contents/MacOS/App Store
    Identifier:      com.apple.appstore
    Version:         1.2.1 (129.7)
    Build Info:      Firenze-129007000000000~2
    Code Type:       X86-64 (Native)
    Parent Process:  launchd [35047]
    User ID:         502
    Date/Time:       2012-10-06 08:15:30.714 -0600
    OS Version:      Mac OS X 10.8.2 (12C54)
    Report Version:  10
    Interval Since Last Report:          298 sec
    Crashes Since Last Report:           1
    Per-App Interval Since Last Report:  39 sec
    Per-App Crashes Since Last Report:   1
    Anonymous UUID:                      4ADFE8AC-D5CE-15CF-35F4-1B776B8AC9A5
    Crashed Thread:  9  Dispatch queue: com.apple.SoftwareUpdate.DistributionEvaluate
    Exception Type:  EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
    Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x00000009135a2cf0
    VM Regions Near 0x9135a2cf0:
        __LINKEDIT             0000000200e5d000-0000000200eb3000 [  344K] r--/rwx SM=COW  /System/Library/Extensions/GeForceGLDriver.bundle/Contents/MacOS/GeForceGLDrive r
    -->
        JS JIT generated code  000035cdcd800000-000035cdcd801000 [    4K] ---/rwx SM=NUL 
    Thread 9 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.SoftwareUpdate.DistributionEvaluate
    0   libsystem_c.dylib                  0x00007fff8f5f1cae OSAtomicAdd32Barrier$VARIANT$mp + 2
    1   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8a9e1256 JSClassRelease + 22
    2   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8aa41b88 OpaqueJSClass::~OpaqueJSClass() + 24
    3   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8aa3a5f7 OpaqueJSClassContextData::~OpaqueJSClassContextData() + 119
    4   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8aa398f8 JSC::JSGlobalData::~JSGlobalData() + 712
    5   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8ab1da17 JSC::JSLockHolder::~JSLockHolder() + 167
    6   com.apple.JavaScriptCore           0x00007fff8a9d0dc8 JSGlobalContextRelease + 216
    7   com.apple.DistributionKit          0x00000001031676aa IFJS_GlobalContextRelease + 41
    8   com.apple.DistributionKit          0x000000010315a536 -[PKDistributionEvaluator dealloc] + 77
    9   com.apple.DistributionKit          0x000000010315756a -[PKDistributionChoiceItem dealloc] + 539
    10  com.apple.CoreFoundation           0x00007fff8967685a CFRelease + 170
    11  com.apple.CoreFoundation           0x00007fff8969dc25 -[__NSArrayM dealloc] + 229
    12  libobjc.A.dylib                    0x00007fff93072230 (anonymous namespace)::AutoreleasePoolPage::pop(void*) + 464
    13  com.apple.CoreFoundation           0x00007fff8969e342 _CFAutoreleasePoolPop + 34
    14  com.apple.Foundation               0x00007fff88fbf4fa -[NSAutoreleasePool drain] + 154
    15  com.apple.SoftwareUpdate.framework     0x0000000102f9ea75 -[SUProductLoadOperation evaluateProduct] + 863
    16  com.apple.SoftwareUpdate.framework     0x0000000102fa3954 __95-[SUScan(Impl) _productsByScanningCatalog:limitedToProductKeys:withLastRecommendedIdentifiers: ]_block_invoke_060 + 49
    17  libdispatch.dylib                  0x00007fff8f583f01 _dispatch_call_block_and_release + 15
    18  libdispatch.dylib                  0x00007fff8f5800b6 _dispatch_client_callout + 8
    19  libdispatch.dylib                  0x00007fff8f58147f _dispatch_queue_drain + 235
    20  libdispatch.dylib                  0x00007fff8f5812f1 _dispatch_queue_invoke + 52
    21  libdispatch.dylib                  0x00007fff8f5811c3 _dispatch_worker_thread2 + 249
    22  libsystem_c.dylib                  0x00007fff8f605cab _pthread_wqthread + 404
    23  libsystem_c.dylib                  0x00007fff8f5f0171 start_wqthread + 13

    Hmmm, it'd make Safari less usefull & AppStore might not work, but try disabling Javascript in Safri & browse best you can.
    The symptoms without the logs are reminiscent of a RAM problem.
    The Memory test can really only be trusted if it finds a problem, not if it doesn't find a problem.
    Memtest OS X...
    http://www.memtestosx.org/joomla/index.php
    Rember is a freeware GUI for the memtest ...
    http://tech.kateva.org/2005/10/rember-freeware-memory-test-utility.html

  • Oracle 10g RAC to 11g RAC Upgrade on Solaris

    Hi,
    We are planning to do a migration of a 4 Node Oracle 10g RAC on Solaris 9 to 11g with Solaris 10. We'd like know what would be the best path to take. We cannot afford any downtime!
    Options: Are these feasible? Which option is best? Any documents links?
    a) Do a rolling upgrade of Oracle from 10g to 11g. Then take down individual nodes and upgrade the Solaris OS from 9 to 10 and bring them up back into the cluster. Is there any known issues taking this path? Is a rolling upgrade like this possible?
    b) Do an upgrade of the Solaris OS from 9 to 10 on each node and then bring them back up? Is this practical? Does Oracle allow different versions of OS running on different nodes?
    c) Use Dataguard with 2 different RAC environments (2 nodes each). How would this work? Is it the only possible way? Any steps please?
    Thanks

    a) Do a rolling upgrade of Oracle from 10g to 11g. Then take down individual nodes and upgrade the Solaris OS from 9 to 10 and bring them up back into the cluster. Is there any known issues taking this path? Is a rolling upgrade like this possible?Hi,
    first of all i would not change several components (OS, database version) at a time. My recommendation is to make small steps and start with the operating system first. Seconds recommendation is to test and test everything in your dev or test environment prior doing the upgrades in the productive environment. Trust me: You will face problems :-) So you better try it beforehand!
    b) Do an upgrade of the Solaris OS from 9 to 10 on each node and then bring them back up? Is this practical? Does Oracle allow different versions of OS running on different nodes?As far i know you can run different operating system versions on different nodes if they are supported (Solaris 9 and 10 are).
    Ronny Egner
    My blog: http://ronnyegner.wordpress.com

  • Has anyone seen this Dyld Error Message:   Library not loaded: /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iLifeSlideshow.framework/Versions/A/iLifeSlid eshow   Referenced from: /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/MacOS/iPhoto   Reason: image not found

    Getting this error on iPhoto open it refers to iLifeSlideShow and iPhoto quits - or doesn't open.
    Dyld Error Message:
      Library not loaded: /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/iLifeSlideshow.framework/Versions/A/iLifeSlid eshow
      Referenced from: /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/MacOS/iPhoto
      Reason: image not found

    Yes, some perople have seen this. Options:
    1. Try reinstall iPhoto. (see below)
    2. If you have access to another Mac with the same version of the OS, try and copy that framework over
    3. Reinstall the OS.
    To re-install iPhoto
    1. Put the iPhoto.app in the trash (Drag it from your Applications Folder to the trash)
    2a: On 10.5:  Go to HD/Library/Receipts and remove any pkg file there with iPhoto in the name.
    2b: On 10.6: Those receipts may be found as follows:  In the Finder use the Go menu and select Go To Folder. In the resulting window type
    /var/db/receipts/
    A Finder Window will open at that location and you can remove the iPhoto pkg files.
    3. Re-install.
    If you purchased an iLife Disk, then iPhoto is on it.
    If iPhoto was installed on your Mac when you go it then it’s on the System Restore disks that came with your Mac. Insert the first one and opt to ‘Install Bundled Applications Only.
    If you purchased it on the App Store you can find it in your Purchases List.
    Regards
    TD

  • Metadevices and Upgrade from Solaris 2.6 to 8

    Hello,
    I want upgrade my current Solaris system from 2.6 to 8. My filesystem are mirrored metadevices including root partion. Are there any problems during upgrade? Did anybody recommend to detach metadevices and mirrors?
    Thanks in advance
    Ivette

    The wikipedia page on solaris http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_(operating_system) shows the changes in the system as newer versions came out. I'd highly suggest getting a test box and setting up Solaris 10 on it, and getting a feel for the new install and in particular, ZFS. It's been a number of years since I last used 2.6, but Solaris 10 is vastly better in many ways, including stability. With ZFS you also don't have to use fsck. The best features of Solaris 10 are the new ZFS file system, zones, snapshots, and the new services (rather than rc scripts). If you are going to set up Solaris 10, it's best to immediately start with bootable ZFS file systems rather than trying to upgrade your UFS file systems later. Security is also vastly improved over 2.6, as well as not having to use the old OpenWindows. Also find out what changes you'll need to make to have your old apps run, with all the changes in libraries and stuff since then.

  • Local mods - upgrading to Solaris 8

    Hi
    I will be upgrading from Solaris 2.6 to Solaris 8.
    How much will I have to re-do in the way of the configuration of things like cron jobs, rtel printers, lpadmin printers, serial port (aurora) configuration and ?any other local modifications?
    Will I have to reinstall the aurora serial port drivers?
    Are the /etc/rcn.d directory contents and /etc/inittab preserved?
    Thanks
    D

    "Most" user configurable files will "survive" an upgrade but it is up to you to find out if such things as aurora serial port drivers are supported, or will even work ,in Solaris 8 or if an upgrade is required. Your primary network interface may be the only interface to survive the upgrade. Cron jobs should be OK.
    The only way to protect yourself is to have a level 0 ufsdump of all your OS slices to a local tape drive. Preferably this will be done from a cdrom boot. Don't really want to dump "live" files. You can then interactivly ufsrestore missing files.
    If your upgrade turns sour, or your filesystems are too small for Solaris 8 then a ufsrestore may be your only recourse.
    Please try to find InfoDoc 16141 - Solaris Upgrade Tips & Checklist.
    Please ensure your system boots before any upgrade begins.

  • Upgrading to Solaris 8 - local modifications

    I will be upgrading from Solaris 2.6 to Solaris 8. (SUN Enterprise 450)
    How much will I have to re-do in the way of the configuration of things like cron jobs, rtel printers, lpadmin printers, serial port (aurora) configuration and ?any other local modifications?
    Will I have to reinstall the aurora serial port drivers?
    Are the /etc/rcn.d directory contents and /etc/inittab preserved?
    Thanks
    D

    "Most" user configurable files will "survive" an upgrade but it is up to you to find out if such things as aurora serial port drivers are supported, or will even work ,in Solaris 8 or if an upgrade is required. Your primary network interface may be the only interface to survive the upgrade. Cron jobs should be OK.
    The only way to protect yourself is to have a level 0 ufsdump of all your OS slices to a local tape drive. Preferably this will be done from a cdrom boot. Don't really want to dump "live" files. You can then interactivly ufsrestore missing files.
    If your upgrade turns sour, or your filesystems are too small for Solaris 8 then a ufsrestore may be your only recourse.
    Please try to find InfoDoc 16141 - Solaris Upgrade Tips & Checklist.
    Please ensure your system boots before any upgrade begins.

  • How to upgrade from solaris 8 to solaris 10

    Hi,
    Currently our server is installed with OS 8. I want to upgrade it to OS 10 as some application software is no more support OS 8. Can you advise on how to upgrade to OS 10 without affecting current server settings and configrations.
    Thanks
    vlsi

    >
    upgrade to OS 10 without affecting current server
    settings and configrations.Generally speaking, Solaris installs will offer you the opportunity to do an "upgrade" install that will preserve your existing config.
    Practically speaking, however, you need to have enough disk space to do the upgrade, and Solaris 10's full install is much larger than Solaris 8's.
    The install can also offer to do a data backup for you if it finds it has to resize your disk partitions, so you should be prepared with a tape drive (or available extra disk or NFS filesystem) for temporary storage of the backup.
    Even with all this, I would still recommend you make a backup of your system before starting.

Maybe you are looking for

  • In compose, the attachment popup does not open

    When composing, the attachment window does not open. Switch to Crome and it works. Switch back to Firefox and it works. Stays working for some days and then fails again. Ken

  • IMovie REALLY Slow

    I have recently been encountering problems with iMovie. When I import a file into a project in "DV" format. It takes about 75 minutes. I have no problem with that. However, the file that I import is in MPEG-4 format. I realized that I could be saving

  • Badi or userexit for iw32 or iw31

    Hi all, My requirement is to add a button in application toolabar of standard transaction IW32. I had searched for exits, but there are no menu or screen exits for this transcation. So i am looking for BADI . But i couldn't find any BADI for doing th

  • StarCam Clip - Just some slight assistance.

    Hi guys,  I just received my first webcam today, the StarCam clip: http://global.msi.com.tw/index.php?func=prodpage2&maincat_no=132&cat2_no=262. Ive installed the drivers and the software correctly and all is working well. The resolution and quality

  • Hoodwinked: Airtunes!

    Just got my new macbook and airport express and am very happy with everything except for airtunes. I was expecting to be able to send any system sound to my stereo but only iTunes seems to work. I tried the demo of airfoil but there was too much lag