16x16 png image looks blurry in flash mx at an integer x y position

I have few small png images (16x16 px) when I place them on
stage it shoudl look best when placed at an integer x and y
position.
e.g. x=100 and y=50
But in MX it only looks clear when placed at an integer with
.8.
e.g x=100.8 and y=50.8.
In MX 2004 and later it looks best at integer values on
stage, as it should be. I didnt changed anything in the image
properties (smooth, quality, etc).
Is this a known Flash MX issue, any ideas?
Thank you.
- Adrian.

ahhh yes - i see the differenc enow. Afaik, there wasn't any
difference in the way flash versions
handles whole numbers. i will try and find your fla today -
what was the url to it?
--> **Adobe Certified Expert**
--> www.mudbubble.com
--> www.keyframer.com
adrianTNT wrote:
> I dont want to sound anoying but don't you see the
blussy icons in 2.html? Here
> is what I see:
>
>
http://adriantnt.com/temp/blurry_icons.jpg
>
> That is in Flash Player 9 IE and PLayer 8 Mozilla, same
thing.
> The images are png placed directly on stage, not inside
clips so no
> registration points to set.
>
> The problem is that I want to distribute the icons for
free as a flash library
> but imagine how my instructions would sound:
>
quote:
"If you use MX 2004 place them at integer value, if you use
mx place them
> at a .8 value but if you have two then place the second
one at .8 and the first
> one at integer value"
> // That doest sound too good, does it? :)
> I will probably just make it compatible with MX 2004
only if no one has a
> solution or knows the cause for this.
> Thanks.
>

Similar Messages

  • My images look blurry when I export or publish my site from Muse. Why and how do I fix it?

    My images look blurry, jagged, pixelated and low quality when I publish or export my site from Muse. Is there any way to avoid or fix this problem?

    The primary cause of blurring images is the less than Photoshop-quality image downsampling algorithm currently used in Muse (that was compounded in early betas due to a bug in the JPEG compression library we were using at that time). Due to work we've done for Beta 7 to improve image encoding performance we now have the infrastructure in place to enable us to take a much better image resampler/resizer (after Beta 7), so this source of blurring will be addressed.
    The other source of blurring is unique to opaque images containing line art or otherwise containing hard edges and large areas of solid color. When an image is opaque Muse will encode it as JPEG (if it's altered in Muse is a way that requires re-encoding). For line art this will introduce JPEG compression artifacts that can be noticeable depending on your eye and the specific image involved.
    There are (at least) to ways to avoid these JPEG compression artifacts:
    Resize your image before placing and avoid applying any effects (rounded corners, drop shadow, etc.) or doing any cropping or resizing in Muse. If the image is unaltered your original JPEG, PNG or GIF will be passed through unaltered.*
    Put at least one pixel of transparency in your original image. (It could be a single 99% opaque pixel.) This will force Muse to encode as PNG. PNG compression is lossless and thus doesn't introduce any compression artifacts. However, an average PNG can be 5 times the size of a JPEG for the same image, so there is an impact to webpage download performance.
    *For PSD files Muse has to encode the original PSD data into some web-friendly image format. If an image is resized in Photoshop and placed Muse won't resize/resample the image data, but it will encode it as JPEG or PNG depending on whether it contains transparency.

  • Images look blurry in small, medium and large view in ADE

    Hi,
    I am working on creating an ePub compatible on ADE, iPad, Kobo and Mobi. I have fixed the issue of image overlapping in ADE view by keeping the width as 100%, but the image looks very blurry on ADE.
    Does anybody advise?
    Thanks,
    Sathish

    It may sound counter-intuitive, but could you try disabling graphics hardware acceleration? Since this feature was added to Firefox, it has gradually improved, but there still are a few glitches.
    You usually need to restart Firefox in order for this to take effect, so save all work first (e.g., mail you are composing, online documents you're editing, etc.).
    orange Firefox button ''or'' classic Tools menu > Options > Advanced
    On the "General" mini-tab, uncheck the box for "Use hardware acceleration when available"
    If you restart Firefox, is the issue resolved?

  • Images look oversharpened in flash

    I did a short flash banner and the images in it (computer
    memory modules)
    look over sharpened when viewed. If I zoom in on the banner,
    the issue goes
    away, but at normal zoom (100%), the images look bad. There
    are other still
    images on the page that are just as small and look fine.
    Seems Flash is
    doing something to them. Anyone had this issue?

    Flash is not doing anything to them. Make sure they are
    placed on whole
    pixel values and at 100% size... Other than that, Flash
    displays an image
    like any other program.
    Dave -
    www.offroadfire.com
    Head Developer
    http://www.blurredistinction.com
    Adobe Community Expert
    http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/

  • Having trouble with images looking blurry

    Please Help!
       When I save two images in photoshop (save for web, maximum jpg) they both look great on my macbook pro. However, when I upload them to my godaddy ftp, and view on my IPAD, one looks fine and the other looks blurry. They are both the exact same width, how can one look sharp and normal....and the other one look blurry???
    NOTE: After ive uploaded to the ftp, when i view on my macbook pro, they are both fine, but when i view on my IPAD, one is fine and the other is blury.
          www.tellysplace.com/womensbottoms.jpg   (the blurry one)
         www.tellysplace.com/womensblouses.jpg  (this one looks fine)
    Please help!!!
    Thank you,
       Jordan

    I am not seeing anything blurry with the first link. My guess is the height is different and your ipad is scaling it. But if your css is set to pixels it shouldn't.

  • Why do my images look blurry when opened in photoshop?

    Hi! i was just wondering if i could get some help with a problem i've been getting since yesterday.
    Before yesterday morning, my photoshop was working just fine but then yesterday morning when i opened this image.
    It would look like this
    instead of it looking like the first image above, the thing though is when i export the image from photoshop as a png, jpeg or any other it looks normal again like this.
    This is the first time this has ever happened so i'm not really sure about what to do.
    I'm using photoshop cs6 and i've also uninstall and reinstall photoshop about 2 times now but it doesn't fix it
    so if anyone can help me that would be great.
    Thanks.

    ssprengel wrote:
    The screenshots you’ve posted look very similar to me, but they are all composed of tiny dots not a continuous-tone image.
    Yes.  They don't make any sense to me either.  Are we supposed to be looking at a blank dark gray rectangle, or has the upload process failed the OP ?

  • Inserting Images - Image look blurry

    I have a problem with FormsCentral that I'm hoping someone can help me with.
    One of my employers sent me a .jpg logo that I want to use in a form.  It looks good when I upload it, but it's too big.  When I resize the logo in Photoshop, it still looks good.  But when I upload it to FormsCentral, then the logo becomes blurry.  Yet it looks fine in Photoshop.
    Does anybody have any idea what I'm doing wrong? I appreciate your help.
    Thanks,
    PJL

    Hello Gen,
    did you receive the mail I send on this topic? I've never heared back from the Feedback-Team.
    We're about to release some questionaires to customers and would linke to use non compressed images - How is the investigation coming along?
    Here's the testimage I sent.
    And the result in formscentral.
    A workaround like linking images doesn't work eighter, because formcentral embedds all images.
    Thanks a lot.

  • Upscaled images look blurry, is there a way to sharpen them? In particular, zooming on pages with images that actually contain only text are hard to read.

    I am zooming in on my homework in mastering physics. I am using a large screen and sitting far away. It uses a lot of images containing the text I need to read, but when the images are upscaled, they become very blurry and hard to read. A simple sharpen effect after it is resized would fix the problem. Is there a way to do this in firefox? like a command line switch or maybe something in about:config? Thanks

    It may sound counter-intuitive, but could you try disabling graphics hardware acceleration? Since this feature was added to Firefox, it has gradually improved, but there still are a few glitches.
    You usually need to restart Firefox in order for this to take effect, so save all work first (e.g., mail you are composing, online documents you're editing, etc.).
    orange Firefox button ''or'' classic Tools menu > Options > Advanced
    On the "General" mini-tab, uncheck the box for "Use hardware acceleration when available"
    If you restart Firefox, is the issue resolved?

  • Why does a TIF image look blurry when placed in InDesign file?

    Hi all,
    I've placed a logo in my InDesign file that I saved out of Photoshop. It appear blurry when in InDesign and I do have it set to high image quality display so that isn't the issue. It is also set as CMYK and I haven't resized it after saving from Photoshop.
    I tried saving a jpg so it would be crisper but then I have a white box behind it when placed in the InDesign file.
    Any help is greatly appreciated as I need to send it to print but can't let it go until I'm sure it won't print like a blurry mess.
    Thanks

    Sub-pixel sampling. Read up on it. you are placing your images at odd values and it gets resampled. Can be anything from the image inside the frame, the image frame itself, some styling option in ID...
    Mylenium

  • Still Image looks blurry when zoomed

    Hello, I am using FCP 5 and I noticed that when I zoom in on a picture, even if it's resolution is much larger than 720 x 480, the picture seems blurry. I tried de-interlacing, however it still remains blurry. In the viewer it seems fine, however once I put it into the Timeline to be viewed in the Canvas, it looses it's clarity when zoomed. Any suggestions?

    Mark,
    Is the project you are working with one that was originally created in an older version of FCP (like 4.5) then upgraded to 5? If so, you might want to try changing your render setting from normal to linear. If that does not do the trick, I would recommend setting up an external monitor. Judge by that- not the canvas.

  • Flash Builder looks blurry on Macbook Pro with Retina displays

    Hello,
    Flash Builder interface looks blurry on MacBook Pro with Retina displays.
    Here is the screenshot:
    http://i.imgur.com/qMmmu.png
    Expand the image to the actual size, and notice that Flash Builder interface looks blurry.
    Please fix this issue.
    Andrey

    I was having the same issue - couldn't believe my eyes on how horrible and fuzzy Flash Builder looked on my new Macbook Pro w Retina.  Was suffering through it for the past week and just found this work around that someone figured out for Eclipse that also works on Flash Builder (guess b/c it's built on Eclipse).  Here's the link to the bug report that shows the work around (Thanks to Brad Hudgeons): 
    https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=382972
    here's a cut and paste from the bug report in case the above url gets removed:
    Here's the workaround:  Do "Show package contents" on the Eclipse.app.  Edit Contents/Info.plist.  Just above  </dict> </plist>  Place this:  <key>NSHighResolutionCapable</key> <true/>
    Instead of Eclipse, show package contents on Adobe Flash Builder 4.6.app.   After you edit the Info.plist file, go back up to the Adobe Flash Builder 4.6.app and duplicate it.  It will create a Adobe Flash Builder 4.6 copy.app.  Delete your original Adobe Flash Builder 4.6 and rename the Adobe Flash Builder 4.6 copy.app to Adobe Flash Builder 4.6.app.  Then launch Flash Builder - you should see text that is much clearer.  The graphics on the ui are still blurry but at least the text should be crisp.

  • Image looks great in PS- when I go to print it looks grainy in printer preview dialog box and prints blurry. Why?

    Image looks great in PS- when I go to print, it looks grainy in printer preview dialog box and prints blurry.  Why is this happening? 

    PS CC, Yosemite, Epson 3880 (called espson to make sure it wasn't something with that), saved as a tiff/psdjpg- all files behave the same way.  When I open the raw file- and only crop the image- it behaves this way now- with grain and blur when printing.  No other files do this in the same shoot.  I worked on this image- could something have gotten corrupted along the way such that now even opening the raw file creates this problem.  SInce upgrading my computer -  a window pops up when I open PS that says I need to update my graphics card?? for 3D- I'm not using 3D- so I don't know if that means anything.  I have to leave for about an hour- but greatly appreciate any feedback. I will be in touch. Thank you.

  • The PNG images as a tree node in GUI sometime looks missing or incomplete.

    Hello,
    I am using a .PNG 24 bit image of Dimension 16x 16 of 619 bytes as a node of JTree and sometime that node images looks incomplete or sometime it looks missing on edges and while doing refresh it again looks good.
    Thanking You
    Ashish Pancholi

    Hi,
    I had something similar to this years ago:
    [http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=257&threadID=516348]
    I solved it by putting my DPI settings back to normal size.
    It may be the same, so check your DPI settings.
    patumaire

  • Saving flash drawing as png image to database

    Hey guys and girls,
    i've seen a few good examples to save out a png of the current flash display area from a webbrowser from a flash, such as:
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flash/articles/saving_flash_graphics.html
    http://activeden.net/item/logo-maker-image-editor/99565
    http://www.flepstudio.org/forum/tutorials/507-swf-png-actionscript-3-0-bytearray-class.htm l
    what they normally do is stream the image data through a png encoder to a web server somewhere and then decode the image data back to current webbrowser and then trigger the web browser SAVE function, by prompting user to select a path and file name to save, like a download.
    What I’m trying to do is very similar, however, the difference is when you click that save button, you can save your png image directly to a certain location with a fixed file name, such as on your local computer:
    D:\flashimage\001.png
    or on a file server: 10.21.111.111\flash_image\001.png
    so i cant find the syntax here. can anyone give me some hints on this? thanks ahead!

    the user.
    Thanks for replying.

  • Why does my high res photoshop image appear blurry when placed in InDesign and Exported as PDF?

    Hi there,
    I have a problem I've been trying to solve for days but just can't find the answer anywhere on the internet.
    I have a large, good quality photoshop file (2268 x 979 pixels, resolution 300 pixels per inch). When I place it into InDesign, the image appears OK (I've changed my display settings to HIGH) - I then resize it in InDesign to 10% and the file still looks great! Then, when I export it as PDF (high quality print) it looks blurry.
    Does anybody know why? The strangest thing is, I've placed other photoshop images in the same InDesign file and they look crystal clear. It is just this one I am having trouble with. I've saved it in the same folder as the other pictures, I've tried placing it as psd. , jpg. , photoshop pdf, png. everything...
    The image looks great in both photoshop and indesign, only when exported as pdf it looks awful.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated,
    Many thanks in advance!
    Weronika

    It's probably the extreme reduction -- you're throwing away 90% of the image pixels and interpolating, and then using jpeg compression on top.

Maybe you are looking for