2 basic questions/ viewing clips and exporting to quicktime

I have to problems thus far. 1stly, I'd like to figure if I can utilize the playback feature for more than one clip at a time. Whenever I try to use it, it only plays one clip then stops at the end, though i'd prefer it continue on through the transition into the next clip.
2ndly, I've exported the clip into a quicktime file and uploaded it to my .mac account. People using apples can view it, but window's users cannot. NOr can they view it when I export it to a full size .mov and just email it to them. It tells them they're missing some compressor. Downloading the newest version of QT does not help either.
Any help in either or both of these matters is greatly appreciated.

Hi John,
the uploading to .mac usually uses a sorenson codec in a .mov container.
That can be watched on PC just when the free Quicktime Player for Windows is installed. does your friends have done that...?
… It tells them they're missing some compressor. Downloading the newest version of QT does not help either. …newest version for PC or on your Mac's side?
QT7 offers now the brandnew h.264 compression codec... this isn't supported on the Windows side yet (just experimental/beta)... so using the "latest" is maybe the wrong way...
in the iM export dialog you'll find the option ".avi" (PC container + sorenson codec)… try that for a mail (big files!) and your friends should see your movie...
and tell them, they shall buy a Mac, hey, c'mon!
you can offer downloads of your project on .mac, but not as convenient as the "upload to" function. ... but that is another cup of tea......

Similar Messages

  • Basic question about storage and safety in iMovie '11

    A very basic question about storage and safety:
    I want to keep a backup of my raw footage on my external hard drive prior to begin working on the movie in iMovie. I want to do this:
    1. Upload the digital files from my camcorder to my Desktop *(as opposed to iMovie)*
    2. Duplicate that footage/clips.
    3. Put the duplicate clips/footage into a folder labeled with the name of that footage (like "Fun At the Dentist" or "Jimmy Learns How to Yodel").
    4. Drag the folder with the footage/clips into my external hard drive into a pre-existing folder titled "Backups/duplicates of all of my raw footage/clips." This big granddaddy folder will house all of the child folders of different movies.
    5 Then, open up iMovie '11 and import the raw footage/clips from my Desktop rather than from my camcorder.
    6. Then I want to make a duplicate of my finished movie and put it in my external hard drive in a "Finished Movies" folder.
    I know that the original raw unedited footage will always be in iMovies '11 but I want the original to also exist immediately accessible in my external hard drive.
    QUESTION:
    Is this viable? Is it wise? (I know it goes an extra unnecessary step, but aside from that.)
    *Do you have any precautionary advice?* Should I do something in my iMovies '11 preferences? What?
    In earlier years with iMovie '04 or '06 (cannot recall) I made many novice errors and ended up losing audio to my finished movie. I also lost footage.
    This time around with iMovie '11 I don't to make such novice, ignorant errors.
    Thanks so much for any comments to this question.
    -L

    Yes I'm sure it will work great for you.
    The iFrame format is something Apple has come up with. The reason for its existence is unknown to me so I can only speculate. But it seems to me that Apple "invented" this format in order to have devices such as Ipod/Ipad/Iphone/Ixxx create clips that are editable on consumer hardware such as already mentioned devices but also standard Mac computers, without the need for format conversion.
    iMovie converts most input formats during import, which takes a lot of time, and this need for conversion often comes as a surprise to most people new to home video editing.
    iFrame has a resolution of 960x540 which is long way from the common standards of 1920x1080 and 1280x720. If your end target is YouTube however, this may not be too bad though. However if you intend to go with YouTube HD, you may find iFrame footage to look wrong since they are effectively upscaled to a higher resolution.
    Technically iFrame uses the H.264 algorithm, a smaller frame size (960x540) and a rather low compression scheme. This will result in large files, but the plus side is that the files are ready for editing without the need for any conversion and iMovie will natively edit the files.

  • I have a huge file which is in GB and I want to split the video into clip and export each clip individually. Can you please help me how to split and export the videos to computer? It will be of great help!!

    I have a huge file which is in GB and I want to split the video into clip and export each clip individually. Can you please help me how to split and export the videos to computer? It will be of great help!!

    video
    What version of Premiere Elements do you have and on what computer operating system is it running?
    Please review the following workflow.
    ATR Premiere Elements Troubleshooting: PE11: Project Assets Organization for Scene and Highlight Grabs from Collection o…
    But please also determine if your project goal is supported by
    a. format of your source
    and
    b. computer resources
    More later based on details that you will post.
    ATR

  • Hello, this might be a basic question, but how do you open QuickTime to record a new webinar? I have a new MacBook Pro with Yosemite and can only get QuickTime to appear in Finder but not actually open to allow me to record something new. Thx.

    Hello, this might be a basic question, but how do you open QuickTime to record a new webinar? I have a new MacBook Pro with Yosemite and can only get QuickTime to appear in Finder but not actually open to allow me to record something new. Thx.

    Hi Winterwilly,
    Welcome to Apple Support Communities. 
    The article linked below answers your question of how to use QuickTime to record something on your MacBook Pro’s screen.
    QuickTime Player 10.x: Record your computer’s screen
    Cheers,
    -Jason

  • Some basic questions on ESS and MSS

    Hi Experts,
    This is the first time I am going to deal with
    ESS and MSS.
    I have some basic questions about it and they are
    listed below:
    1. In an organization if they want to integrate
    ESS and MSS, how do they go about? What I mean
    is, will they install the packages in the R/3
    system and then use the to portal features to
    make iViews of ESS and MSS.
    2. Or is there a seperate package for the portal
    and the R/3 system
    3.What is the best way to customize ESS and MSS
    iViews? Is WebDynpro used to customize ESS and
    MSS applications, if yes how?
    4. Are these ESS and MSS packages different for
    ECC and the older version of R/3 systems? If yes what are the major differences?
    Please do let me know on these subjects and also
    if anyone of you have any links or documents
    associated with this scenario please do send me.
    Thank you
    Regards
    Luke

    Hi,
    here is what I know..
    1 & 2. Depending on the backend SAP version, the relevant ESS/MSS Business Packages have to be installed on the Portal. On the backend it will be via an Add-on.
    3. The webDynpro versions of ESS/MSS are available from mySAP ERP2004/2005 (ECC5/6). The best way to customize the iViews would be through the NetWeaver DevStudio.
    ent
    4. Yes, the ESS/MSS packages are differ depending on the backend SAP version.
    You can find all the  different packages & their info right here on SDN. From the home page click on the Portal Content Portfolio on the right hand side of the page>Browse Content Portfolio>Self Service for ESS & Line Manager for MSS.
    Regards,
    Suresh Datti

  • What is the best workflow to duplicate adjustments across many clips and export them separately?

    Hi,
    I'm pretty new at this. I have 30 or so clips comprising about 90 min of HD AVCHD video. I'd like to adjust color and lighting and export them separately as max quality MP4s(h.264). In terms of PE, no real fancyeffects, the adjustments panel meets my needs. I plan to apply the same adjustments to each clip at least as a starting point. I own Adobe the Elements Family ver 12 (Premiere, Photoshop, and Organizer) and LightRoom. Can you advise me on what the most expeditious workflow would be?
    I'm not sure about any of this but here is my thinking so far:
    Premiere Elements:
    Pro:  Offers good adjustment control.
    Con: I'm thinking adjustments only apply to clips on the timeline or storyboard. If I remove the clip from the time line, adjustments won't stick in the assets panel. Export, exports everything on the time line. I'd have to go through the adjustment and export process individually for each clip. Not sure if I can save a development preset?
    Elements Organizer:
    Pro:  Can work with and export clips as separate files. Adjustments can be duplicated across clips(?).
    Con:  Not as many adjustment controls as Premiere Elements.
    LightRoom:
    Pro:  Can work with and export clips as separate files. Adjustments can be duplicated across clips.
    Con: Not sure if it has as many adjustment controls as Premiere Elements or not. Any others?
    Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
    BillyB

    I've had a few awarenesses since writing this post. Thought I'd write them up before a generous soul spent time answering my above question.
    It has become evident to me that I should be using one of the databases to accomplish this task rather than the video editor. ie EO or LR rather than PrEl. (I started with PrEl, therefore my confusion.)
    Organizer vs. LR is a question that I brought up before with lot's of helpful replies. No need to repeat all that. I guess one remaining question that would be helpful to know, however, is which library has superior video editing for a single video and for application of edits across multiple videos, Elements Organizer or LightRoom?
    thanks for reading!
    BillyB

  • IMovie HD 6.0.3: After making 10 movies where I clipped portions from a larger clip (and exported the smaller clips), suddenly iMovie clips are much shorter after I export them.

    Hi there,
    I am using iMovie HD 6.0.3 on an older MacBookPro (OS X, 10.4.11).
    I took an AVI video and imported that into iMovie HD.
    I then created smaller clips out of that - like editing a 20 minute video into small, 30 second clips.
    I made about 10 of these smaller clips, exported them using "expert settings," and burned the results to DVD. These all worked fine.
    Suddenly, the final product that I export is much shorter than the clip I created. For example, I'll create a 30 second smaller clip from the original. When I review this 30 second clip, it is what I wanted.
    When I export this 30 second clip, it makes a QuickTime movie that is only 23 seconds. (The first 10 I made did not do this).
    I tried extending my clip by 7 seconds, hoping to end up with a 30 second clip after exporting. The result was even shorter - like 15 seconds.
    I have checked disk space - it has at least 500 GB free space. I have tried exporting the clip to both my laptop and to an external hard drive. The results are the same.
    I just tried using the "crop" feature to see if my end product was better - but it was the same.
    Does anyone know what is going on? Why did this start after making 10 successful exports? What can I do to get it working right again, as I have 3 more clips to make and am running up against a deadline.
    Thanks so much!
    Heidi

    Since I can't edit this post... (Why?) I'd add: fast forwarding and fast reverse (shift key and arrow left or right) the HA files is also not smooth. They play alright. I'm surprised iMovie can't handle them either. I didn't have a problem with the earlier camcorder's HA files... (All were converted MTS files using Movie Converter.)

  • Basic question inbound / outbound and source service (ASA 5505)

    Hi there,
    I'm new to the ASA 5505 appliance and have a few very basic questions. Hope I get some responses and not flamed for being a total newbie. :-)
    Inbound versus outbound: I'm having a difficulty understanding the inbound versus outbound terminology. Can somebody please clarify? For example, if I want to block all http traffic from hosts on the inside to the internet but allow all https connections, intuitively I'd configure a rule to block outbound (= outgoing) traffic for the http protocol for the inside network. However, it seems as if I have to add this rule for inbound connections. Why is a connection from a host on the inside to a web server on the internet considered an inbound connection on the inside interface?
    When I add a rule, I've got a "service" field and a "Source Service" field in the "More Options" section. What's the difference? Do I have to set both to the same value?
    Your help is greatly appreciated.

    Hi Ralf,
    Yes, if you put a deny http, it would drop all packets for destination as http port, but be mindful that when you apply an access-list on your inside interface, it automatically activates the deny ip any any right at the bottom, you would be able to see that in the ASDM. So for the users that need be allowed access to the http, needs to be explicitly allowed http access, so your correct configuration would be:
    access-list inside_access_in deny tcp host 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 any eq http
    access-list inside_access_in permit tcp any any
    access-group inside_access_in interface inside
    This would block 192.168.1.1 to go to internet, but allow all others.
    Second question, i haven't chceked the ASDM, but just remember out of memory, that this service option should be the protocol, whether ip,tcp,udp,esp or gre etc.
    Moreover always try to block connections as closed to the source as possible, this would mean, if you want to filter traffic going from inside to outside, that should be done on the inside interface not outside.
    Thanks,
    Varun Rao
    Security Team,
    Cisco TAC

  • Basic Question on Copy and Delta link which one to use when?

    Hi
    Its basic question
    My understanding about copy and Delta link is
    Copy doesnot ahve direct relationship with source object (but it acts as a sibling) any changes done to spurce object does not affect target object.
    Where as Delta link will have a parent child relation ship between source object bacially its a copy of source and inherits id properties. in case if i change source object does this affect target object, we can delete, add content to delta link target object.
    let's say if i want to use standard quickpoll iView do i need to use copy or delta link similarly for other iviews, worksets, roles which one will be better.
    Regards,
    Murali

    Murali,
    Yes, your understanding is right.
    Case 1 : Copy
    A- Object
    B- Copy of A
    Both of them are independent.Any changes in A are not dependent on B and vice versa.
    Case 2 : Delta Link
    A - Object
    B - Copy of A (via Delta link)
    Any changes to A are reflected in B, as A is a parent and B a child.
    But B would be an independent entity.Any changes to B would not effect A.
    When you use either of them, depends on your need. When you are working with standard iviews or roles or workset, you can do a copy of the original, because in most cases we would not make changes to the standard roles or worksets or iviews. There by eliminating the process of making a delta copy.
    But, if you are dealing with the roles that you have created and want to make a copy of it, you can use a delta link, because, even if you want to add more iviews and worksets to that role, they would get reflected when you make a delta copy.
    Hope that helps.
    Consider rewarding points for handy posts!
    Cheers,
    Sandeep Tudumu
    Edited by: Sandeep Tudumu on May 6, 2008 2:10 AM

  • General error in FCP re: rendering and export  after Quicktime 7.5.5 update

    Hi
    My FCP 6.0.4 rendering and export to Compressor no longer works after an update to Quicktime 7.5.5.
    Rendering fails after a few seconds "General Error!" pops up. Exporting to Compressor, after setting it compressing, Compressor after a few seconds fails. (audio is processed) My current work around is exporting a sequence using Quicktime conversion (time consuming) and then opening in Compressor.
    I've done the usual, deleting prefs, new sequences and projects, even saving movs in different codecs.
    (been using H.264)
    My sequences are all custom sizes but tests using presets also fail.
    Any ideas anyone?
    And I was so happy the Quicktime upgrade could play sequence movs recorded months earlier that until now I couldn't play properly due to previous Quicktime upgrades!
    Apple gives with one hand and takes with the other....

    Hi There,
    Thanks for your reply on this.
    Well basically since I'm using content already in the H.254 codec (eg: a trailer off the internet, or the downsizing of HD footage) i'm just exporting to a codec that didn't have to be rendered and gave quality results. I used motion jpeg B as an export codec because it was quick (although HD space hungry) with no drop in quality. The resulting exports could be imported into a custom sequence (720 x 405) as square pixel aspect ratio files. Overlapping the canvas with other windows (eg: viewer) meant I could play a clip (with dropped frames) but not have to render it. I selected the H.264 codec as the sequence codec because I've found other codecs introduce darkening or lightening or blurring or other undesirable artefacts when exported to Compressor. H.264 used in the sequence settings exported through Compressor would give resulting m2v's as sharp and contrast accurate as the source file.
    That was until the recent 7.5.5 Quicktime update where attempts to do the same things I did before result in "General Error!" coming up after a few seconds of play or rendering.
    Traditional DV codecs are "blurry" in my opinion, especially when coping with web content or conversion of HD downloads.
    If you can suggest an editing codec that works best with FCP that is quick, doesn't introduce blurring or general degrading of the image I'd be happy to try it out. I typically downsize HD content from the web for DVD playback, so it's usually in a H.264 codec already. So i would need a codec for export from Quicktime that would work best with a codec in FCP. That doesn't alter picture quality when compressed to m2v in Compressor.
    Thanks!

  • How do I import a video in mp4 and export in QuickTime H.264?

    Or is that even possible? Whenever I try I get a error "Incompatible codec..."

    It's one file that was produced in a different video software that I used before purchasing Premiere Pro.
    Most of it is composed of a series of stills, though there is a portion that is video (mp4 from the old software). I'm assuming I might have better luck creating a new video and exporting it in that format by importing the stills and video and working with them in Premiere Pro.

  • Difference between Export as Quicktime and Export as Quicktime Conversion

    If the desired end result is a Quicktime file, compressed with the default h.264 "for broadband" preset, should there be any difference between:
    1) exporting a sequence with "Export as Quicktime", then opening up that file in Quicktime Pro and compressing it with the preset.
    or
    2) exporting the sequence with "Export as Quicktime conversion" with the preset.
    I had expected these to be equivalent, but I've found that method #2 gives me dramatically sharper text in titles. Can anyone explain why? I'm using FCE 4.

    Well I reckon it's because you are crunching numbers twice, in #2 it's once.
    Despite digital transfers being said to Lossless, I call it Lessloss.
    Al

  • Gamma and Exporting thru Quicktime

    Apparently, when you export thru Quicktime, it modifies the gamma according to the codec used. How can I have a consistent gamma when importing-exporting UNCOMPRESSED 1920-1080 @23.98 image sequences?

    Hi John,
    the uploading to .mac usually uses a sorenson codec in a .mov container.
    That can be watched on PC just when the free Quicktime Player for Windows is installed. does your friends have done that...?
    … It tells them they're missing some compressor. Downloading the newest version of QT does not help either. …newest version for PC or on your Mac's side?
    QT7 offers now the brandnew h.264 compression codec... this isn't supported on the Windows side yet (just experimental/beta)... so using the "latest" is maybe the wrong way...
    in the iM export dialog you'll find the option ".avi" (PC container + sorenson codec)… try that for a mail (big files!) and your friends should see your movie...
    and tell them, they shall buy a Mac, hey, c'mon!
    you can offer downloads of your project on .mac, but not as convenient as the "upload to" function. ... but that is another cup of tea......

  • Timeline problem by mixing 4:3 and 16:9 clips and export to iDVD

    Have a few 4:3 clips dragged to timeline, rest 16:9. The 4:3 clips are shown in 16:9 modus (reduced hight, dim correct). The seq is set DV- PAL (not anamorfic). By exporting I use QT conversion, QT movie, DV-PAL, 4:3 asp rat. Result: All 16:9 clips are OK, but the 4:3 clips are expanded in the hight to fill the 4:3 TV screen. What to do, I want all in 16:9?
    When exporting to iDVD I want the result in 16:9.
    Another question: how achive best quality by exporting and iDVD prod.?
    Thanks ia!
    Ivar

    If you want to export a 16:9 movie you have to work in a 16:9 sequence.
    http://www.fcpbook.com/Video9.html
    Export QuickTime Movie.

  • IMovie 08: Can I just trim clip and export without encoding?

    I already have an encoded clip, no need to do so again. What I need to do is edit it and then exported the edited video. Is there way to do a clean export with no encoding?

    Well basically I'm just trying to figure out a way to lose as little quality as possible. I guess that I could re-encode. Basically I encoded this video as it came into the computer and I need to edit it. I have got around this in Quicktime by just using the trim feature but this video has many more cuts than just one. I'm trying to get it to AVI or MP4, any suggestions on settings that won't severely compress the video?

Maybe you are looking for