20 minutes timeout for full RAM/Card Encryption is...

After over 2 monhts heavy usavge, I'm quite happy with my E72 so far, except for some memory leak issues.
I did get a bit annoyed by the fact that the auto-lock feature cannot be set for more than 20 minutes. One of the resons I got the E72 was the strong RAM+Card encryption but I expected it to be a bit more flexible.
It is true that having a forced lock timeout helps protect your device (you'd forget to lock it sometimes) but there are certain occasions where I find this extremely annoying. For instance:
-When I am at home I find no need to have it locked all the time.
-When I am at work and the phone is always next to me, I find annoying that it auto-locks every 20 minutes when I'm using it as an audio player - makes you have to unlock when you want to interact
-In certain applications, it is annoying that it autolocks and you can't interact. One example is Sygic Mobile GPS software that crashes when it locks. With other software it would be annoying too as you'd be locked and unable to interact with the phone in any trip taking longer than 20 minutes.
So I have two suggestions
-Make the maximum lock delay a bit longer - for instance 60 minutes.
and/or
Give us an option similar to what you get in timed Profiles, for instance, "Stay unlocked until hh:mm" - This would be handy when you're home and well... no one is going to steal your phone/access it/lose it.

I don't mean the keyboard lock, I mean the native Symbian OS phone lock when you are using RAM and/or Card Encryption with the E72.
It is built in on the OS and you cannot set it to be over 20 minutes. If you leave your phone untouched for 20 minutes it will lock/encrypt itself.
Then you have to
1) unlock the keyboard
2) enter the unlock code to decrypt
The problem is that the auto-lock feature timer is limited to 1-20 minutes.
If you want for instance to use your phone for a GPS navigation trip and don't touch it for 20 minutes, it will lock + encrypt.... in some occasions would be nice to have a much longer timer.
I wish Nokia would tweak this in the next firmware or at least allow us to specify certain applications where it would not auto-lock at all.

Similar Messages

Nokia E72 - Bypassing RAM+Card encryption

I just realized something interesting with my E72 - people can access my data even without knowing the password.
Details are as follows:
-E72 firmware 022.007. Both memory and MicroSD card are encrypted. Phone set to auto-lock at every 20 minutes.
I have an alternate home screen application installed (Voyager Home Screen) and just noticed that possible to invoke Voyager even after the phone has been "locked" (encrypted). Using Voyager I can load up any file management tool, for instance X-Plorer and access the card and any files.
All one has to to is unlock the keyboard, there is no need to know the lock code or input it.
Perhaps this has something to do with the way Voyager Home Screen works but it made me realize that perhaps the data isn't secure at all... even with encryption.

Well I have another update to this issue... I have accidentally hit the EXIT button during encryption and then the phone restarted. I then disabled memory card encryption and it took about one hour. After that I had some corrupted files in my microSD, some videos that I added later. The original OVI Maps and other files were not affected.
OK, I then decided to retry the encryption process. I enabled the encryption and it was enabled istantaneously as other people said. I then wondered what should it be. Then I came to my mind that probably the phone uses the memory card lock password to generate the encryption key. So I CHANGED the memory card lock password and enabled memory card encryption again. Well the encryption is going on right now (at 10% after 15 minutes on 16GB). So it seems that you firstly have to set the memory lock password and then enable memory card encryption, in that way the card would be encrypted juat as the phone memory encryption works.

Credit Card Encryption through RFC calls to third party software

Dear All,
   I am working on credit card encryption in CRM. At our firm, we have SAP R/3 which is integrated with third party server for performing credit card encryption using RFC calls. We want to perform similar thing in SAP CRM. I was looking into SAP standard mechanism to perform encryption and it seems they use class CL_PCA_SECURITY -> External Encryption to encrypt credit card. Are there any BADIs available for me to change behaviour of this call and call our listeners (for third party server) instead of what standard SAP is calling. Here is what in the code:
call C function 'SSFENVELOPE'
CALL 'SSF_ABAP_SERVICE'                                 "#EC CI_CCALL
       ID 'OPCODE'             FIELD   SSF_OPCODES-ENVELOPE
       ID 'SECTOOLKIT'         FIELD   SSFTOOLKIT
       ID 'STRFORMAT'          FIELD   STR_FORMAT
       ID 'STRFORMATL'         FIELD   STR_FORMAT_L
       ID 'BINENC'             FIELD   B_INENC
       ID 'IOSPEC'             FIELD   IO_SPEC
       ID 'OSTRINPUTDATAL'     FIELD   OSTR_INPUT_DATA_L
       ID 'STRPAB'             FIELD   STR_PAB
       ID 'STRPABL'            FIELD   STR_PAB_L
       ID 'STRPABPASSWORD'     FIELD   STR_PAB_PASSWORD
       ID 'STRPABPASSWORDL'    FIELD   STR_PAB_PASSWORD_L
       ID 'OSTRENVELOPEDDATAL' FIELD   OSTR_ENVELOPED_DATA_L
       ID 'CRC'                FIELD   CRC
       ID 'OSTRINPUTDATA'      FIELD   OSTR_INPUT_DATA-SYS
       ID 'RECIPIENTLIST'      FIELD   RCPTAB-SYS
       ID 'OSTRENVELOPEDDATA' FIELD   OSTR_ENVELOPED_DATA-SYS
       ID 'STRSYMENCRALG'      FIELD   STR_SYM_ENCR_ALG
       ID 'STRSYMENCRALGL'     FIELD   STR_SYM_ENCR_ALG_L.

Vivek,
While it may be technically possible to accomplish what you are suggesting (leveraging the encryption functionality provided by your third-party server) I would recommend strongly that you consider a token-based solution instead. You can learn more about tokenization on this [blog|/people/eric.bushman4/blog/2009/01/02/tokenization-as-a-means-of-securing-credit-card-numbers ].
There are many reasons why a token-based solution is superior to using application specific encryption (as outlined in the blog), but specifically in the case you describe where an SAP CRM and SAP R/3 are involved there is one specific reason to consider:
When order data is replicated between SAP CRM and SAP R/3 the systems will attempt to decrypt the credit card numbers prior to passing the data and therefore the RAW card number will be stored in the middleware logs. This is especially true when using SAP's native credit card encryption logic in the CRM and R/3-ECC applications.
For example, let's say a user enters a credit card as the form of payment during Order Creation in CRM. At Order Save the system will send the credit card information to your third-party server for an authorization attempt and the results will be returned to CRM. As the Order is saved and committed to the CRM database the standard SAP encryption functionality can be leveraged to encrypt the card data. Based on your middleware configuration, eventually the Order data (including the credit card details) will be sent to the R/3 or ECC system. In order to do so the CRM system will first decrypt the card number meaning that the CRM middleware logs will contain RAW card numbers. When the Order is created in R/3 or ECC the native credit card encryption functionality in R/3 or ECC could be used to encrypt the card number prior to the Order being stored in the database.
Should you choose to use a third-party server you may find, depending on how the third-party vendor's logic works in SAP, that you must utilize a BADI to decrypt the card number in CRM so that the CRM middleware has a RAW card and so that when the Orders is saved in the R/3 or ECC system it can be encrypted again with the third-party vendor solution. In either case the RAW card number is present in all systems for some period of time and potentially stored in logs thus exposing your systems to risk and greater PCI audit scrutiny.
Eric Bushman
VP, Solutions Engineering
[Paymetric|https://www.paymetric.com]

How do you transfer MXF files to Prores for FCP - a full CF card at a time?

A full 64Gb card at a time, rather than 100+ clips individually...
Step-by-step would be good as I've not dome it before...
Thanks!

Panasonic mxf cam saved mxf videos on P2 card. While Canon mxf cam saved MXF files on CF card.
And as .mxf file format is not fully supported by Mac non-linear editing software like FCP.
For P2 cards, you can use the Import From Camera, then click "Open Camera Archive". And then transfer your P2 MXF to FCP referring to a Panasonic Column.
For Canon MXF files, to make it easier for editing Canon MXF videos on FCP 6/7/X, here you can find an easy way to get MXF smoothly editing in FCP.
Compatible OS: Mac OS X like Tiger, Leopard, Snow Leopard, Lion, Mountain Lion.

Security encryption for Original Airport Card?

I recently purchased and installed an Apple Original Airport card(802.11b) for my iBook G3 running OSX Tiger(10.4.8). All available written documentation that I've obtained is telling me that the card is only 128 bit WEP encryption capable. However, I have been able to log onto my home network and access the internet via my router which is configured for WPA-PSK security encryption.
Now, my question is? Do I have a problem with my home network security if I'm able to access it with a wireless card that is not supposed to be able to access it? Has anyone else encountered this?

Hey Guys,
I have a small problem with setting up our WIFI network!
I have a G3 IBOOK Clemshell & a PC XP SP2 both on the WIFI Network. Right now i just removed the SSID and i enabled MAC filtering. But i want to secure our Network more, but how do i do that.
How do i know, which WPA i need to take?
I have a Belkin router/ Modem and i can choose WPA/WPA2-Personal (PSK)but than i have a field for "Authentication" what do i need to choose there? the options are: WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK or WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK. after that i have this field "Encryption Technique" and i can choose TKIP, AES or TKIP+AES! what to take???
I know, so many questions,
but first of all, i am quite new to APPLE and to WIFIs so a lot to learn, i really do hope, you can give me a hand!
Best Regards,
Jan

HT1849 I bought a song(which is 5 1/2 minutes long), but it stops playing after 15 seconds and moves onto the next song. I bought this song in a set with 5 other songs, all of which play for full time. Is there anyway to fix this?

So yeah, pretty much what the title says... Is there anyway to fix it? Like I said, ALL of the other songs play for full time. All but that one song.

If your country's iTunes Store allows you to redownload purchased tracks, I'd delete your current copy of the track and try redownloading a fresh one. See the following document for instructions:
Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store
Otherwise, I'd report the problem to the iTunes Store.
Log in to the Store. Click on "Account" in your Quick Links. When you're in your Account information screen, go down to Purchase History and click "See all".
Find the item that is not playing properly. If you can't see "Report a Problem" next to the item, click the "Report a problem" button. Now click the "Report a Problem" link next to the item.

S920 SD Card Encryption for Exchange Active Sync

My S920 cannot setup 'Exchange Active Sync' service to connect to my corporate exchange mail server.
The server requires the phone to encrypt both phone and sd card.
I could encrypt the phone, but not the sd card.
I wonder the S920 has the SD card encryption function.
Can someone suggest me?

Can S920 encrypt its SD Card?
If yes, how?
Thank you.

? IDEAS FOR A CONTOLLER CARD FOR ATA 400 GB HD??

Hi Chaps,
The Nitty Gritty:
Seeking an inexpensive PCI controller card to unlock the full size & speed of my newly installed 400 GB Seagate Ultra ATA HD, which is currently limited to the 137 MB cap of my oldschool Quicksilver G4.
Looking for widely available card that I could possibly find in-store. I have perused the discussion boards at length but feeling more confused.
Budget is key, I have heard they are available as little as $40. I do not need any RAID capability, just fast and reliable inexpensive product.
System:
G4 Quicksilver AGP
450 Mhz
768 MB SDRAM
CD ROM DRIVE (soon upgrading to Pioneer DVR-111D)
OS 10.4
Thanking you all in advance for any suggestions!!
Best,
-- Jesse
G4 450 processor Mac OS X (10.4) 768 MB SDRAM
G4 dbl processor

Jesse, welcome, here is a link to the Acard PCI card, you might check your local supplier for any additional deals or rebates.
Joe
Power Mac G4 Gigabit Ethernet Mac OS X (10.3.9) 1.5 GB Ram, ENCORE/ST G4, Tempo SATA, ATI Radeon 9000, Adaptec 4000

Minimum specs for a graphics card.

I just changed over my PE9 to an i7 2600 on a Gigabyte motherboard Z86 UD 3R with 8g ram . 64bit Windows7
The improvement is trully amazing compared with my old Core duo
I am using my 2 year old Radeon HD4350. It plays full HD AVCHD in full screen flawlessly in Windows Media Player.on my 1900x1200 monitor
Everything I shoot is in full HD 1900x1080i 25 frames
Preview is perfectly smooth when rendered. No crashes yet!
Preview of clip areas with red lines is mostly OK but a bit jerky at times. If I pause and restart preview it fixes the jerk
My question is would there be any improvement in previewing smoothness of unrendered material if I went to a faster graphics card?.
How does one tell if one needs a faster card?

I agree with Neale. When using PrE, the biggest requirement for a video card will be the updated drivers. So long as ATI/AMD supports the card, and issues new drivers for it constantly, a newer, faster video card will not provide much of an improvement with the exception of the very few GPU Effects.
Now, with PrPro, as of CS 5, things are greatly different, in that with certain nVidia cards, much processing is handed off to the GPU through the Mercury Playback Engine (MPE) and the card's CUDA function. MPE has not made its way into PrE yet.
With most HD material, the biggest BFTB ("Bang For the Buck") is upgrading the CPU, such as you did. Next and in about a tie, will be RAM (with a 64-bit OS and 64-bit program) and additional HDD's.
Good luck,
Hunt

Error: Timeout for content=(number) in production only

Running Portal 3.0.9.8.2. Apps Server Sun 450R; Database Server Sun 450R. Environments are same for both Development and Production. Similar performance navigating the site(s), load is not an issue, however Development returns Oracle Text(Intermedia) searches within 2-3 seconds while Production continually hits the 'Portal Content Area' provider timeout of 15 seconds and displays 'Error: Timeout for content=(15???)'. We use ctx_schedule to run nightly 'SYNC' and 'OPTIMIZE' jobs on all 6 indexes. This error only appears when searching, never when navigating and only in production. Any advice on where to start looking for problems?
Regards, Joshua

...update...
The 15 second timeouts can be alleviated by increasing the 'Portal Content Area' provider timeout value, however, that is just a symptom. Our problem is that the searches should not be taking 15 seconds to return.
We thought we were scheduling our 'SYNC' and 'OPTIMIZE' jobs to run nightly by issuing the following command for each of our indexes...
exec ctx_schedule.startup ('PORTAL30.WWSBR_THING_CTX_INDX', 'SYNC', 1440, TO_DATE('4/17/2002 01:00:00', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
exec ctx_schedule.startup ('PORTAL30.WWSBR_THING_CTX_INDX', 'OPTIMIZE FULL', 1440, TO_DATE('4/17/2002 02:00:00', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
However, after checking the interval column in the dba_jobs table we found that each job was scheduled to run every minute (we hope this explains our sudden performance problem). Select what,interval from dba_jobs returns...
ctxsys.ctx_ddl.sync_index('PORTAL30.WWSBR_THING_CTX_INDX');|sysdate + (1 / 24 / 60)
ctxsys.ctx_ddl.optimize_index('PORTAL30.WWSBR_THING_CTX_INDX', 'FULL');|sysdate + (1 / 24 / 60)
Why, when we pass in 1440 as the wait_time parameter, do the jobs get scheduled to run every minute?

3 GB RAM card?

Hi, I want to upgrade my Macbook's RAM. I know my computer can handle up to 6 GB of RAM. But I also know that it runs more efficiently with matched RAM. So the most effective thing to do would be to have two 3 GB cards, one for each slot. But so far I haven't been able to find a 3 GB card. I've found 1 GB and 2 GB, but then it always seems to skip to 4 GB. So my question is, is there such a thing as a single RAM card with 3 GB of RAM? If there is, I'd very much appreciate a link to an online store that sells them. If there isn't, then I'd been interested to know why.
I know that the newer Macbooks take a different type of RAM then mine. I believe mine takes 200-pin DDR2 RAM

There are no 3GB modules commercially available. You would need to use a 4GB and 2GB module to get the 6GB. The performance gain you get with the extra memory will far outweigh the benefit of running in dual channel mode... so don't worry about about using different capacity modules.
The difference in running dual channel would be something like running a mile in 4 minutes 26 seconds vs. 4 minutes 23 seconds. While there is "technically" a difference, it would not be something you would ever notice without actually running a benchmark. The benefits of more RAM are far greater.

E72 memory card encryption

Setting up card encryption goes through the motions but appears to instantly encrypt the card! Given memory encryption takes a few minutes, it looks like nothing actually happens. Indeed, trying to decrypt the card doesn't do anything! Haven't yet tried to read the card in another device, but I suspect it isn't. Other reportson the net concur with this. Given that encryption was one of the main reasons for looking at this phone, this is a bit of an issue.
Mark Enderby

Having updated to 31.023 and going through a hard reset. The system now says that the card encryption is "off". Have switched it on again and the effect is the same. System says card is encrypted - but nothings actually happened!

Best bang-for-buck video card for hi-end Photoshop work..?

When I bought my rig 3 or 4 years ago, I was told that when it comes to 2D performance, all modern video cards are created equal. That the price differences really only affect the 3D side of things.
So I bought a NVIDIA GeForce GT 240.
Why this thing has a fan, I have no idea. Like I said, even when I bought it it was considered "bottom-of-the-heap". Anyhoo, long story short, the fan died on me a couple of days ago. I can now keep the card from overheating through a house fan pointed at the open case. Naturally, I can't keep this going forever. I need to buy a new card.
The good news is that I don't need ANY 3D performance (unless vector logos count). I only use my computer for hi-res Photoshop work (at 1920x1200+ resolution with PSD files that sometimes reach 5 or 6GB) and full-screen video playback. No games are being played on this rig whatsoever.
The bad news, however, is that money is an issue. I can't just go buy the latest $300 card, especially not to put on a 3 or 4 year old rig. The Core i7 920 CPU and 10GB of ram (on Windows 7 64) will keep me going for a couple of years more, but I don't expect to still be using this rig much further beyond that.
I just want to keep using my Adobe suite and play movies in hi-res on this thing. That's it.
I've been told to look into the NVIDIA Quadro series, but that appears to me out of my price range. I'd like to keep it under $150. Or even $100 if at all possible. Other cards quoted to me are the GT630 and R7-250 (which is apparently a rebranded Radeon HD 7770).
What would you guys recommend that would be the best bang for my buck in this scenario? I'd hope most of today's cards - even the cheapest ones - are at least a step up from the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240. Right?
If anyone has any advice...

Trevor Dennis wrote:
There was an article on Tom's Hardware yesterday, announcing that nVidia are stopping driver support for it's older cards.
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-eol-graphics-card,26304.html
This goes back to the 300 range and earlier cards, but also includes the Geforce 405 from the 400 range.
Be that as it may, my GT 240 is still being listed as supported in last week's 335.23 driver release. And that's the driver that fried it. This "1 driver for all our cards" thing is really for the birds. There's no way for product owners to know what the latest, safest driver for their card is. I don't think NVIDIA thought this thing through when they announced they'd be going with a "single driver for all" model.
I don't think NVIDIA realizes what a huge potential lawsuit could be headed their way from other owners like myself (but not me, I'm not very letigious) who saw their cards get physically damaged by drivers that were supposed to be compatible with them.
I see you recommending I stay under $100, which was my original plan, but then you said I should definitely get a Quadro. When I checked, Quadro cards were more expensive than the GeForce line. Did I misunderstand? Were you saying NOT to touch the Quadros?
On other forums, they tell me to push for the new GTX 750, swearing its 2D performance makes it worth the price, despite the fact that it's clearly a GAMING card, and I don't game.
I'm so confused.

Power available for GPU/graphics card/Quadro 4000

I need to upgrade to a Quadro 4000 GPU in order to use DaVinci Resolve on my Mac Pro. DaVinci needs to graphics cards for full operation: the Quadro to process video and another card to actually run the displays (an Apple 30" Cinema Display and a 21" DVI monitor).
Any of the decently powerful cards I'm looking at require power from the mainboard -- which has two power outlets. The Quadro 4000 requires both of them.
Is there another power source available somewhere inside the computer to run this second graphics card? Or perhaps someone can suggest a good solid graphics card to run the two displays that does not require power?

And your Mac running OS X will not accept the Quadro 4000.
http://store.apple.com/us/product/H3314LL/A
Same card on Amazon for $790 with MacPro3,1 or later
http://www.amazon.com/PNY-DisplayPort-Profesional-Graphics-VCQ4000MAC-PB/dp/B004 CRS78O/
There are some helpful comments there like this one:
i work in 3D visual effects, post production, and graphics.
this video card works fantastic under Windows 7. the Windows drivers for the Quadro are finely tuned and allow particular applications to take full advantage of the video card.
under OS X, the card is NOT worth the premium cost. my ATI 5870 performs better in applications that the Quadro 4000 is suppose to work better with. for the life of me, i can't understand why Nvidia/Apple can't get these drivers right under OS X. its the same story, Quadro release after Quadro release. Nvidia and Apple just don't seem to care. my current 2010 12-core Mac Pro might be my very last Apple desktop. i just can't justify the Apple tax anymore if Apple isn't going to provide basic stuff professionals need. it just seems like Apple is drifting farther and farther away from the professional market.....so disappointing.
another extremely annoying thing is that i can't have my ATI 5870 and Quadro 4000 running at the same time. the Mac Pro only has two 6-pin power cables!!!! what's with that!! are you kidding me??!!
So you need to look at a new Mac. Or running Windows. Or... something.
2008 brought with it EFI64 / UEFI which is what you would need right now. Had you waited back when you did buy your Mac Pro until March 2008.... you would really have been set as far as usiing Quadro or GTX 285 and having 64-bit EFI. I just think this is another of those times.
Not everyone is ready to and running Lion, but Lion does have some support for the GTX 580, which is more power.
http://netkas.org/?p=1059
http://forum.netkas.org/index.php/topic,979.0.html
http://forum.netkas.org/index.php/topic,979.15.html
This: support for GTX cards even in MacPro1,1 if you have 10.7,3
http://forum.netkas.org/index.php/topic,1897.0.html
Why wait? Ivy Bridge from Intel in April will and has to arrive someday on Apple's desktop.
the GTX 680 arrives on 23rd, and AMD has their new line of GPUs, so something there.
Your GTX 285 no matter what, unless the seller isn't what he/you say they are, should work in Windows, Mac OR PC. I've used GTX 260 in my Mac Pro and in a PC with X58.
Vendors are coming out with Thunder storage arrays more so now, more for laptops and other systems, but there and using optical.
Given your needs etc I would find someone that wants your system and PowerPC etc and part with it. If you can't wait, or don't want "1.0" and want solid mature and known hardware, pick up one (you could even get the $2100 2.8 4-core ref'd model and do the W3680 6-core 3.33GHz $599 yourself.
www.macperformanceguide.com has a number of tips. The guy is now running 100% SSDs with a pair of PCIe controllers populated with 1TB SSD modules on each, and 48GB RAM. 2010 lets you use 3 x 8 or 16GB RAM also.

Double-clicking on Sender name to view full contact card

Just upgraded to Outlook 2013 with Lync 2013, and so far I hate it. In Outlook 2007, when I opened an email I could double-click on the sender's name and pull up its full contact card with all of the information that I had entered before, including
their picture or company logo. Now in the 2013 version, I get some light-weight pop-up showing some of the sender's info and either no picture or the picture that they included in Lync. Is there any way of restoring the full contact card? Also,
is there any way to get the Reading Pane to show by default the picture that I assigned to that contact?

Hi,
When I click on the sender's name in an email, it opens the Outlook Properties dialog instead of the full contact editing form.
If you want to open the full Contact Form in Outlook 2013, you can click on the View Source link of the Contact Card, and click the source
Outlook (Contacts, your email address):
For more information, please refer:
http://www.msoutlook.info/question/727
Regards,
Steve Fan
TechNet Community Support

20 minutes timeout for full RAM/Card Encryption is...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for