4215 IDS - SNMP - CISCO-CIDS-MIB

We have loaded the CISCO-CIDS-MIB on our monitor but can not seem to get the CPU monitoring working. Where can we find the monitor info for the 4215 IDS.

The link gives the information about the Supported Devices and Software Versions for Monitoring Center for Security/.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/cscowork/ps3991/products_device_support_table09186a008018d981.html

Similar Messages

Unable proxy ping using CISCO-PING-MIB in MPLS VPN ?

using CISCO-PING-MIB in MPLS VPN ?
In CISCO-PING-MIB.my document, wu can use the CISCO-PING-MIB to
Proxy ping the hosts in the MPLS VPN (vrf).
But when i do it, router will return the message:
errstat =12; errindex = 1(ciscoPingProtocol).
If Router isn't configed vrf, can proxy ping.
If set the error vrf name in snmp packet,
errstat=10; errindex=8(vrfname)
Do Cisco Support Proxy ping with vrf???

sorry, i don't use unix station, i program to send snmp messages.
parameters:
ciscoPingProtocol = 1(IP);
ciscoPingAddress =x.x.x.x;
ciscoPingPacketCount=
ciscoPingPacketSize=
ciscoPingPacketTimeout=
ciscoPingDelay=
ciscoPingEntryStatus=4;
ciscoPingVrfName="vpn1";
The parameters is right, because when i don't use ciscoPingVrfName, i can
ping the address.
But i set the ciscoPingVrfName="vpn1", the error is received.
thanks.

ACE snmpwalk not return values for CISCO-SLB-MIB

Hi everyone,
I need some help with snmp for the ACE. I am unable to get any results when running an snmpwalk for the object slbVServerClientByteCounts.
In fact, I get no results for anything related to CISCO-SLB-MIB. I can run an snmp translate against this mib and I am able to get the OIDs but when I run an snmpwalk against the ACE I get nothing for this mibs. I do however get results for the mibs: SNMPv2-SMI, IF-MIB, IP-MIB etc..etc..
My main goal is to get the traffic going to the virtual server vip and then graph it. I need to use the CISCO-SLB-MIB to do this.
Can someone please help? I will try and answer your questions to the best of my knowledge.
Thank you.

Ok I fully understand. I have verified that I have only one context (Admin).
Would you be able to explain why I am able to see some oid data and nothing for others? Your results for oid slbVServerClientByteCounts is exactly what I am looking for.
This is what I have:
snmpwalk -v 2c -c xxxxx 172.16.14.100 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.161.1.4.2.1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.2.1.39 = STRING: "Port80"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.2.1.40 = STRING: "Port100"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.2.1.41 = STRING: "Port1010"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.2.1.42 = STRING: "Port21"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.2.1.43 = STRING: "Port444"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.3.1.39 = STRING: "test"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.3.1.40 = STRING: "test"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.3.1.41 = STRING: "test"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.3.1.42 = STRING: "test"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.3.1.43 = STRING: "test"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.4.1.39 = INTEGER: 2
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.4.1.40 = INTEGER: 2
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.4.1.41 = INTEGER: 2
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.4.1.42 = INTEGER: 1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.4.1.43 = INTEGER: 1
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.5.1.39 = STRING: "Operational"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.5.1.40 = STRING: "Operational"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.5.1.41 = STRING: "Operational"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.5.1.42 = STRING: "No Active serverfarm(s) in Policy"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.5.1.43 = STRING: "No Active serverfarm(s) in Policy"
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.6.1.39 = Gauge32: 134
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.6.1.40 = Gauge32: 25
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.6.1.41 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.6.1.42 = Gauge32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.7.1.39 = Counter32: 510534985
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.7.1.40 = Counter32: 26901235
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.7.1.41 = Counter32: 86784
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.7.1.42 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.7.1.43 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.8.1.39 = Counter32: 128982
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.8.1.40 = Counter32: 3167
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.8.1.41 = Counter32: 7
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.8.1.42 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.8.1.43 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.9.1.39 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.9.1.40 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.9.1.41 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.9.1.42 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.9.1.43 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.10.1.39 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.10.1.40 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.10.1.41 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.10.1.42 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.10.1.43 = Counter32: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.11.1.39 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.11.1.40 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.11.1.41 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.11.1.42 = Counter64: 0
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.11.1.43 = Counter64: 0

4215 EoS and cisco general EoS policy

Hello,
Can anybody help me on this matter:
I'm finding a discrepancy between Cisco general EoS policy and the 4215 EoS announcement.
As per Cisco general EoS policy:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_end-of-life_policy.html
Software support will be as follows:
â¢ For the first year following the end-of-sale date, we will provide bug fixes, maintenance releases, work arounds, or patches for critical bugs reported via the TAC or Cisco.com Web site.
â¢ After the first year and for Operating System SW -where available- we will provide bug fixes, maintenance releases, workarounds or patches for a period of 4 years for operating system software. Bear in mind that it may be necessary to use software upgrade release to correct a reported problem.
â¢ After the first year and for Application SW -where available - we will provide bug fixes, maintenance releases, workarounds or patches for a period of 2 years for application software. Bear in mind that it may be necessary to use software upgrade release to correct a reported problem.
So as a result, Cisco will provide bug fixes, maintenance releases, workarounds or patches for:
â¢ A total period of 5 years (from EoS announcement) for Operating System SW
â¢ A total period of 3 years (from EoS announcement) for Application SW.
Now, on the other hand, if we look specifically to the 4215 end of life announcement:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5729/ps5713/ps4077/ps5367/end_of_life_notice_for_cisco_ids_4215_sensor.html
It's clear that:
End of SW Maintenance Releases Date: HW The last date that Cisco Engineering may release any final software maintenance releases or bug fixes. After this date, Cisco Engineering will no longer develop, repair, maintain, or test the product software. July 29, 2009
Which is only one year aver the EoS announcement, and it's said regardless of the support contract.
We can see that there is discrepancy between the general EoS policy and the 4215 EoS announcement.
My questions are:
â¢ is the IPS4215 considered as an âOperating System SWâ or âApplication SWâ?
â¢ Can anybody please explain this discrepancy between the general EoS policy and the 4215 EoS announcement? It is not stated at all in the 4215 announcement that Cisco will provide bug fixes, maintenance releases, workarounds or patches for:
- A total period of 5 years (from EoS announcement) for Operating System SW
- A total period of 3 years (from EoS announcement) for Application SW.
Thank you

Hello,
Can anybody help me on this matter:
I'm finding a discrepancy between Cisco general EoS policy and the 4215 EoS announcement.
As per Cisco general EoS policy:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_end-of-life_policy.html
Software support will be as follows:
â¢ For the first year following the end-of-sale date, we will provide bug fixes, maintenance releases, work arounds, or patches for critical bugs reported via the TAC or Cisco.com Web site.
â¢ After the first year and for Operating System SW -where available- we will provide bug fixes, maintenance releases, workarounds or patches for a period of 4 years for operating system software. Bear in mind that it may be necessary to use software upgrade release to correct a reported problem.
â¢ After the first year and for Application SW -where available - we will provide bug fixes, maintenance releases, workarounds or patches for a period of 2 years for application software. Bear in mind that it may be necessary to use software upgrade release to correct a reported problem.
So as a result, Cisco will provide bug fixes, maintenance releases, workarounds or patches for:
â¢ A total period of 5 years (from EoS announcement) for Operating System SW
â¢ A total period of 3 years (from EoS announcement) for Application SW.
Now, on the other hand, if we look specifically to the 4215 end of life announcement:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5729/ps5713/ps4077/ps5367/end_of_life_notice_for_cisco_ids_4215_sensor.html
It's clear that:
End of SW Maintenance Releases Date: HW The last date that Cisco Engineering may release any final software maintenance releases or bug fixes. After this date, Cisco Engineering will no longer develop, repair, maintain, or test the product software. July 29, 2009
Which is only one year aver the EoS announcement, and it's said regardless of the support contract.
We can see that there is discrepancy between the general EoS policy and the 4215 EoS announcement.
My questions are:
â¢ is the IPS4215 considered as an âOperating System SWâ or âApplication SWâ?
â¢ Can anybody please explain this discrepancy between the general EoS policy and the 4215 EoS announcement? It is not stated at all in the 4215 announcement that Cisco will provide bug fixes, maintenance releases, workarounds or patches for:
- A total period of 5 years (from EoS announcement) for Operating System SW
- A total period of 3 years (from EoS announcement) for Application SW.
Thank you

Cisco ace mibs for concurrent connection on real and virtual servers

i have loaded cisco provided mibs for cisco ace into nms but i am not able to fetch the details from ace appliance 4710.where can i find IODs for this.
would really appreciate if anyone can help me regarding this

Hi Manohar,
you need two MIBs:
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Normale Tabelle";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/CISCO-SLB-MIB.my
ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/CISCO-ENHANCED-SLB-MIB.my
The current connection you will find in the section:
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Normale Tabelle";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
slbVServerInfoTableEntry .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.161.1.4.2.1
Example:
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Normale Tabelle";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
slbVServerNumberOfConnections .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.161.1.4.2.1.6.1.44
Use a MIB-Browser to find out the OID for each server.
Best Regards,
Achim

OLD-CISCO-CHASSIS-MIB variable cardOperStatus

Hello,
On CATOS switches we use the CISCO-STACK-MIB variable moduleStatus as follows, this works fine :
plato> snmpwalk -m CISCO-STACK-MIB -v 2c cat102 'mialaz&' moduleStatus
enterprises.cisco.workgroup.ciscoStackMIB.moduleGrp.moduleTable.moduleEntry.moduleStatus.1
= ok(2)
On an IOS(Cat4K) switch there is no CISCO-STACK-MIB support instead we use OLD-CISCO-CHASSIS-MIB with variable cardOperStatus , this does not work :
% snmpwalk -m OLD-CISCO-CHASSIS-MIB -v 2c cat211 'mialaz&' cardOperStatus
enterprises.cisco.temporary.chassis.cardTable.cardTableEntry.cardOperStatus
= No Such Instance currently exists
How can we read the module status on an IOS based switch?
Thanks.

Cat4K runnung IOS does not support OLD-CISCO-CHASSIS-MIB: ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/supportlists/cat4000/cat4000-supportlist.html
Use ENTITY-MIB instead

CISCO-RTTMON-MIB.my

In the MIB CISCO-RTTMON-MIB, for the notification 'rttMonLpdDiscoveryNotification', the first 2 varbinds are 'rttMplsVpnMonCtrlTag' and 'rttMonLpdGrpStatsTargetPE'. What's the diff b/w the two as both are addresses ?
Thanks in advance
Sunil

While both may be an address in your configuration, the two could be very different. The value of rttMplsVpnMonCtrlTag can be any string:
       "A string which is used by a managing application to
       identify the RTT target.       This string will be configured as rttMonCtrlAdminTag for all
       the operations configured by this Auto SAA L3 MPLS VPN.       The usage of this value in Auto SAA L3 MPLS VPN is same as
       rttMonCtrlAdminTag in RTT operation."
Where as the value of rttMonLpdGrpStatsTargetPE with also be an address.

Cisco WAAS MIB for CPU AND MEMORY

Hi,
I am looking to query Cisco WAAS WAVE and SRE device for basic stuff cpu, memory, interface.
I managed to get the CPU stats via SNMP using HOST-RESOURCES-MIB, however i cannot use the memory usage utilisation.
Can you please help.
Furthermore, I wanted to have some environmental values, temperature. Is there any MIB for that purpose.
Thanks

There's a "Show cpu " commmand availabe. Type help or '?' for a list of available commands.

SNMP - Cisco hardware

Is anyone finding that the Network Monitor is only reading SNMP v2 for certain models of Cisco switch?
SG300-52 is working fine, however our SG500XG-8F8T, it does not even pull the device name
I've tested this with PRTG and it works fine, so I know it's not the switch
Also what would be nice is being able to analyse the ports directly, at least to read what the connected MAC address is to the port
Thanks
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Hi,
Are you saying that ccmCLIRunningConfigChanged is not triggered upon exit from config mode on a Nexus 5K? What version are you running?
.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.43.2.0.2
ccmCLIRunningConfigChanged OBJECT-TYPE
    -- FROM    CISCO-CONFIG-MAN-MIB
    TRAP
    VARBINDS    { ccmHistoryRunningLastChanged, ccmHistoryEventTerminalType }
    DESCRIPTION    "This notification indicates that the running
            configuration of the managed system has changed
            from the CLI.
            If the managed system supports a separate
            configuration mode(where the configuration commands
            are entered under a configuration session which
            affects the running configuration of the system),
            then this notification is sent when the configuration
            mode is exited.
            During this configuration session there can be
            one or more running configuration changes."
Does the following return a value?
.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.43.1.3.1
ccmCLICfgRunConfNotifEnable OBJECT-TYPE
    -- FROM    CISCO-CONFIG-MAN-MIB
    -- TEXTUAL CONVENTION TruthValue
    SYNTAX        Integer { true(1), false(2) }
    MAX-ACCESS    read-write
    STATUS        Current
    DESCRIPTION    "This variable indicates whether the system produces
            the ccmCLIRunningConfigChanged notification. A false
            value will prevent notifications from being generated
            by this system."

Bandwidth Calculation based on Network IP Address on SNMP Cisco 3750

Dear All,
Instead of getting bandwidth calculation on cisco switch via snmp for total in and out or based on port, is it possible to get the calculation of bandwidth for in and out for the C Class IP on the network ? That mean i can get the calculation for each of my network IP address from the Cisco, what i'm doing now is to get from my bridge server and i run the iptables and some bash script and also MRTG
Please advice. TQ

Hi Abhi,
you're welcome. Thanks for rating & marking as answered!
I have CISCO 6503 box also with me. Could you please confirm if feature would be supported on 6503 ethernet ports or not?
Have a look at the Release Notes:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SXF/native/release/notes/features.html#wp2800031
"New Software Features in Release 12.2(18)SXF2
Support with Supervisor Engine 2 for these features, which are already supported with other Supervisor Engines:
- IP unnumbered for VLAN-SVI interfaces
-VLANs over IP unnumbered sub-interfaces"
I have to say I've never done this so far on a c6500 but I think you can rely on the RN.
HTH
Rolf

How to enable IPS IPS/IDS in cisco 2811

Hi all,
I have a Cisco 2811 with IOS Version 12.4(20)T and I need to enable IPS or IDS in this. What is the config for this?
First of all, I need to know whether I can do IPS/IDS in my router as well..
- Ribin

Hi,
I did enabled IPS in the router and configured to notify to our log server. Below is the log I received in my log server.
What does IPS does now and what kind of logs I can expect?
Thanks,
Ribin
Apr 19 14:53:38 192.168.11.10 4546: *Apr 19 09:27:41.254: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by ribin on vty0 (192.168.11.35)
Apr 19 18:04:29 192.168.11.10 4548: *Apr 19 12:38:32.601: %CRYPTO-6-IPSEC_USING_DEFAULT: IPSec is using default transforms
Apr 19 18:12:10 192.168.11.10 4549: *Apr 19 12:46:14.541: %IPS-6-ENGINE_BUILDS_STARTED: 12:46:14 UTC Apr 19 2009
Apr 19 18:12:10 192.168.11.10 4550: *Apr 19 12:46:14.541: %IPS-6-ENGINE_BUILDING: atomic-ip - 3 signatures - 1 of 13 engines
Apr 19 18:12:10 192.168.11.10 4551: *Apr 19 12:46:14.557: %IPS-6-ENGINE_READY: atomic-ip - build time 16 ms - packets for this engine will be scanned
Apr 19 18:12:10 192.168.11.10 4552: *Apr 19 12:46:14.557: %IPS-6-ALL_ENGINE_BUILDS_COMPLETE: elapsed time 16 ms

Catalyst 6500/Cisco 7600 MIB's

Could anyone tell me all MIB's I need to manage a Catalyst 6500/Cisco 7600? Or better, do you know any documents where I could find this information?
Thanks for your help.

You can get all these MIBs from http://www.cisco.com/public/mibs
As for what MIBs you need, it depends on what you're trying to poll.

SNMP MIBS for 4240 version 5.0

Does anyone know where I can find the MIBS for the traps sent for each alert in IDS Version 5.0
I have looked all over the ftp and web on the cisco site and cannot find them.
Thanks,

Hi,
The process to get the CISCO-CIDS-MIB published on CCO is already on and hope you will find it very soon. Meanwhile I am enclosing the MIB here which you can refer to. The other mibs supported are CISCO-PROCESS-MIB, CISCO-ENHANCED-MEMPOOL-MIB and CISCO-ENTITY-ALARM-MIB which you can get from CCO.

Can't get SNMP data from ASA's AIP 10 IPS module

Hi,
I have just had the AIP 10 IPS module installed onto my ASA 5520. I have now setup the SNMP and my SNMP server (solarwinds) can detect the CPU, Memory and sensors to monitor.
The problem I have is the SNMP server is getting data form the sensors but not data from the CPU or memory mibs, is something denying this from the IPS?

The following are some IDS mibs, Cisco forgot to link them on the MIBs page located at http://www.cisco.com/public/sw-center/netmgmt/cmtk/mibs.shtml
ftp://ftp-sj.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/CISCO-ENHANCED-MEMPOOL-MIB.my
ftp://ftp-sj.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/CISCO-PROCESS-MIB.my
ftp://ftp-sj.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/CISCO-CIDS-MIB.my
ftp://ftp-sj.cisco.com/pub/mibs/oid/CISCO-CIDS-MIB.oid
ftp://ftp-sj.cisco.com/pub/mibs/oid/CISCO-ENHANCED-MEMPOOL-MIB.oid
Here is the forula we are using to get the memory utlization percentage(in BMC Dashboard):
average ( select 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.221.1.1.1.1.8 ) / ( average ( select 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.221.1.1.1.1.8 ) + average ( select 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.221.1.1.1.1.7 ) ) * 100
Which translates to:
average ( select cempmempoolfree ) / ( average ( select cempmempoolfree ) + average ( select cempmempoolused ) ) * 100
I'm unable to find the formula for the CPU, but try loading the PROCESS mib for that.
average ( select 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.5 )
Please rate if helpful.
Regards
Farrukh

Can't get snmp data..........

I just download new patch for solaris x86 from sun site.
This patch contain grub boot system.
After I patch and reboot,I can not receieve snmp data from my solaris box.
Do I miss something ?

The following are some IDS mibs, Cisco forgot to link them on the MIBs page located at http://www.cisco.com/public/sw-center/netmgmt/cmtk/mibs.shtml
ftp://ftp-sj.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/CISCO-ENHANCED-MEMPOOL-MIB.my
ftp://ftp-sj.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/CISCO-PROCESS-MIB.my
ftp://ftp-sj.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/CISCO-CIDS-MIB.my
ftp://ftp-sj.cisco.com/pub/mibs/oid/CISCO-CIDS-MIB.oid
ftp://ftp-sj.cisco.com/pub/mibs/oid/CISCO-ENHANCED-MEMPOOL-MIB.oid
Here is the forula we are using to get the memory utlization percentage(in BMC Dashboard):
average ( select 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.221.1.1.1.1.8 ) / ( average ( select 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.221.1.1.1.1.8 ) + average ( select 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.221.1.1.1.1.7 ) ) * 100
Which translates to:
average ( select cempmempoolfree ) / ( average ( select cempmempoolfree ) + average ( select cempmempoolused ) ) * 100
I'm unable to find the formula for the CPU, but try loading the PROCESS mib for that.
average ( select 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.5 )
Please rate if helpful.
Regards
Farrukh

4215 IDS - SNMP - CISCO-CIDS-MIB

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for