64-bit J2SE and J2EE

Any word on when there will be a 64 bit version of the J2EE and the Sun application server for Windows 2003?
Or have I just overlooked it on the download page?
Thanks,
Brad

I am also in need for this version. Does this available ?

Similar Messages

  • Difference between J2SE and J2EE...

    Hi all. I was wondering what the difference between J2SE and J2EE were. I mean in the code structure. Are the packages the same, like Swing, IO, things like that. I'm a bit of a beginner in Java, only been messing around with it for about 6 months now kind of in my spare time, and I know I'm in now way ready for J2EE, but it's something I think I'd like to maybe look into. I know it's for Enterprise Applications, much bigger scale than I'm used to, but fundamentally, how is it different? Different coding conventions? New packages not in J2SE? I hope what I want is coming across okay. Thanks for all the input.
    James

    J2EE defines a large number of specifications, in addition to J2SE. Examples are the Servlet, JSP, JMS, and EJB specifications. Most of those specifications are designed to have implementations running inside an Application Server. There are free implementations available such as JBoss (combined with for example Tomcat), and I think youre best bet to learn is to download one of those and go from there. Servlets and JSP are a good beginning, and then maybe move on to EJB and the rest.
    Br - J

  • J2SE and J2EE

    what are the differences of J2SE and J2EE in terms of programming? I have used J2SE in developing java applets and standalone applications and now, I want to explore more with J2EE. I am reading articles and site regarding J2EE. But for you what is J2EE all about?.
    Thanks!

    To be frank, if you have to ask you don't need it. Learn most of what Java SE has and can do; then you'll have a sufficient knowledge base to understand and use Java EE as it's intended, on enterprise-level applications.
    If you want more information read the documentation, as I don't care to digest it for you.

  • J2SE and J2EE Which with what ?

    I am running Windows NT 4.0 server, with SP6a & Windows NT 4.0 work station, with SP6a. On reading the various combinations of J2Se and J2EE, which do I need to match. Also I am using ant 1.5.3 and looking at some CORBA 3 work using JacORB 1.4.1. I have been using J2SDK 1.4.1_02 for general jave work.
    From what I have been reading it looks as if I need J2SE 1.3.1_02 with J2EE 1.3.1.
    What is the real combinations of J2SE and J2EE needed for such a asystem ?
    Also at present I do not particularly wish to move to a Win2000 Server/workstation combintion as yet.
    Thanks
    Omegaall

    You may now download J2EE 1.4 which will be compatible with your existing installation of J2SE 1.4.1_02.
    However, J2EE consists of the application server and additional tools. They are not required, nor are they recommended for heavy duty enterprise work; J2EE is simply a basic "reference" platform for you to get your feet wet on.
    Other alternatives do exist, and if you've tracked down Ant, you probably already know about Tomcat, JBoss, WebSphere and a number of commercial engines. All of these packages essentially take J2EE and extend them further (or are faster, or are more reliable, etc etc).
    If you have been asked to develop COBRA objects - as opposed to, and I stress this, as opposed to - merely being interested in the technology, then I strongly strongly strongly suggest you find out what your customer is using and set up a scheme similar to theirs. By developing to the same platform, you can save yourself a lot of deployment and packaging headaches, and essentially develop the objects "the right way" for that system.

  • JSP with J2SE and J2EE

    I am learning JSP from a book that is a year old. Can you tell me if the JSP for J2EE is different from that for J2SE ?

    J2SE stands for Java2 Standard Edition which is supposed to define Java standards (and API) to run day-to-day application (single user applications).
    J2EE on other hand is Java2 Enterprise Edition. Its supposed to define standards (and API) to be used to create server application that service multiple clients.
    One does not succeed the other, rather they target diffenet segments and are complementary. J2EE is more of extension of J2SE capabilities (A J2EE application will requires API defined in J2SE packages).
    JSP is part of the J2EE specification (other part being Servlets, EJB, JavaMail, JMS etc) and its supposed to have nothing to do with J2SE excepct using the latter's API in its implementation.
    What others have been trying to tell you is that JSP is part of J2EE specification but you need not know the other components of the specification to use JSP.
    Amitabh

  • JWSDP and J2EE Integration: Doesn't work. What's the point?

    My problems involve the integration of JWSDP and J2EE as described in these two documents:
    http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/WebServices/wsj2ee/
    http://java.sun.com/j2ee/documentation/windows_guide.html
    It looks like a long one, but it�s really not that bad. All comments are appreciated.
    I�ve numbered each line-paragraph-section for easy reference later.
    (1) My ultimate goal is to setup a website that displays data from a database. I will use Java, Apache, Oracle, and whatever else I need to create a website that uses servlets, JavaServer Pages (JSP), and JDBC.
    (2) I�ve got four Pentium III computers:
    1. Windows 2000 Server to be the web server (MyWebServer, IP = 10.10.1.1).
    2. Windows 2000 Professional to be the database server (MyDatabaseServer, IP = 10.10.1.2).
    3. Windows 2000 Professional that I use to develop and test (MyDeveloperPC, IP = 10.10.1.3).
    4. Windows 2000 Professional that I use as a client to connect to the website (MyClientPC, IP = 10.10.1.4).
    (3) On MyWebServer I installed the following:
    Java 2 Standard Edition (J2SE)
    Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE)
    Java Web Services Developer Pack (JWSDP)
    The JWSDP tutorial
    Apache HTTP Server
    (4) The files I downloaded and installed are as follows:
    j2sdk-1_4_0-rc-win.exe
    j2sdkee-1_3_1-win.exe
    jwsdp-1_0-ea1-win.exe
    jwsdp-1_0-ea1_01-tutorial.zip
    apache_1.3.23-win32-x86-no_src.exe
    (5) After installing these products, I set the environment variables as follows:
    JAVA_HOME = c:\j2se
    J2EE_HOME = c:\j2ee
    JWSDP_HOME = c:\jwsdp
    Path = c:\j2se\bin;c:\j2ee\bin;c:\jwsdp\bin; [and other previous statements]
    (6) I checked to see that Apache is running as a service. It is.
    On MyWebServer I start Tomcat and J2EE. Both start properly and are operating simultaneously.
    (7) From MyClientPC I open Internet Explorer and in the address box I type:
    http://10.10.1.1
    This displays the page c:\ApacheHTTP\apache\htdocs\index.html.en (The Apache default server installation page.)
    (8) I then enter this address in IE:
    http://10.10.1.1:8080
    This displays the page c:\jwsdp\webapps\root\index.html (The default JWSDP page).
    (9) I then enter this address in IE:
    http://10.10.1.1:8000
    This displays the page c:\j2ee\public_html\index.html (The J2EE 1.3 Default Home Page).
    (10) So far so good. Now I want to test JWSDP as a container for JSP pages.
    (11) I use ant to build the converter app found in the tutorial examples (in folder c:\jwsdp\�\tutorial\examples\gs). I then deploy the converter app to the c:\jwsdp\webapps\gs folder.
    (12) From MyClientPC I open Internet Explorer and in the address box I type:
    http://10.10.1.1:8080/gs
    The converter app works perfectly.
    (13) To eliminate the need to enter the port number, I create a link from the Apache default server installation page to the converter app. From MyClientPC and enter this address into IE:
    http://10.10.1.1
    I then click on the link to the converter app and it works perfectly.
    (14) Question: Is this the best way to display JSP pages without having to enter the port number?
    (15) Now it�s time to integrate JWSDP and J2EE as described in these two documents:
    http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/WebServices/wsj2ee/
    http://java.sun.com/j2ee/documentation/windows_guide.html
    (16) After I complete this integration I cannot start both Tomcat and J2EE at the same time. This makes sense because they both share port 8080.
    I start Tomcat.
    (17) From MyClientPC and use Internet Explorer to test the various relevant addresses. Everything works the same as it did before except this one:
    http://10.10.1.1:8000
    The page cannot be displayed. The J2EE default home page is not displayed, which makes sense because the J2EE port is no longer 8000; it has been changed to 8080.
    (18) Now I shutdown Tomcat and start J2EE.
    From MyClientPC and use Internet Explorer to test the various relevant addresses:
    (19) http://10.10.1.1:8080
    Displays the JWSDP default home page.
    (20) http://10.10.1.1:8080/gs
    The page cannot be displayed. The converter app no longer works.
    (21) From MyWebServer and use Internet Explorer to test localhost:
    http://localhost:8080
    This displays the J2EE default home page.
    (22) Question: Why does localhost give me a different page than the IP address?
    (23) Question: What was the point of integrating JWSDP and J2EE?
    (24) I want to get the converter app working, so I create a .war file and attempt to add it to the J2EE deploytool (see the two integration documents listed above at section 15.) I create the .war file following the instructions in the JWSDP tutorial:
    http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/ea1/tutorial/doc/WebApp3.html#64606
    (25) I change to the c:\jwsdp\�\tutorial\examples\gs\build folder.
    I then type:
    jar cvf converter.war .
    A .war file is created.
    (26) I open the deploytool: File, New, Application, and I name it �converter�.
    I attempt to add the .war file: File, Add to Application, Web WAR.
    (27) When I attempt to add the converter.war file I get this error:
    �converter.war does not appear to be a valid web JAR.�
    I tried a few different attempts, all with the same result. I�m stuck.
    (28) I ask again, What was the point of integrating JWSDP and J2EE?
    (29) If this is the preferred configuration, how do I display my JSP pages like the converter app?
    Please help!!!

    The JWSDP tutorial says to be in the �build� folder of the example when issuing the jar command to create the .war file. The build folder is created when I run the �ant build� command.
    Attempt 1 from the command prompt in folder c:\jwsdp\tutorial\examples\gs\build>
    I typed this command:
    jar cvf c:\jaxmservices\converter.war .
    In this case I directed the .war file to be placed in a different folder as you suggested. Here�s the output:
    added manifest
    adding: index.jsp(in = 921) (out= 525)(deflated 42%)
    adding: WEB-INF/(in = 0) (out= 0)(stored 0%)
    adding: WEB-INF/classes/(in = 0) (out= 0)(stored 0%)
    adding: WEB-INF/classes/Converter.class(in = 582) (out= 358)(deflated 38%)
    Didn�t work. Same error as before.
    Attempt 2 from the same folder:
    I typed this command as you suggested (I tried it with and without the final dot):
    jar tvf converter.war
    Here is the output:
    java.io.FileNotFoundException: converter.war (The system cannot find the file specified)
    at java.io.FileInputStream.open(Native Method)
    at java.io.FileInputStream.<init>(FileInputStream.java:103)
    at java.io.FileInputStream.<init>(FileInputStream.java:66)
    at sun.tools.jar.Main.run(Main.java:185)
    at sun.tools.jar.Main.main(Main.java:904)
    I tried a few other variations on these attempts with no luck. I�m stuck.
    I�m attempting to create a .war file out of two files: index.jsp and converter.class.
    Now that I�ve integrated JWSDP and J2EE, is there some other way that I can run the converter app instead of a .war file and the deploytool? In other words, if I go back to using ant to build and deploy converter, where would I deploy it so that it will work with J2EE?
    By the way, it doesn�t have to be converter. I�d be happy if I could get any JSP page to work in J2EE after the integration.
    Forever grateful,
    Logan

  • Do u know what is jdk 1.4.1 and j2ee 1.4.1?

    hi~ do u know what is jdk 1.4.1 and j2ee 1.4.1? Are they sotware program like jbuilderX for example? Do u know which of these 2 is better for jxta? Do u know the installation procedures for jdk1.4.1 and j2ee1.4.1? thanks!

    jdk means J2SE(Java Software Development Kit)
    is it j2ee or jre?
    No they are the main software for run a java program.
    jbuilderX is a editor where you can write java programs using jdk or jre.
    Both are need for jxta.
    Just run jdk 1.4.1 setup.exe file.That automatically install jdk and jre to your PC.

  • J2SE to J2EE

    I'm considering a jump from J2SE to J2EE. My question is,
    What are the main differences between the two?

    "I have been using databases in some of my apps."
    JDBC lies completely inside J2SE, J2EE does not add anything to it.
    "I would like to add a servlet to my latest app."
    If you are looking into using JSPs, Servlets, and the rest of J2EE to replace PHP server applications, then you are on the right track. If you just want to use a Servlet in a regular, desktop app, you are probably looking at it wrong (adding the necessary Servlet Container (web server) would be a huge footprint to the app, and prolly something that your users would not want on their computer...)
    "...explain some of the advantages of using enterprise instead of the standard edition"
    You don't use it instead of the standard edition, you use it on top of the standard edition. You use it to write web applications. That way, you have one centralized server that does the work. The user has versions of a client (a web browser or any client that can read the data you send... this could be a J2SE desktop app if you wanted...) that the user interacts with, and which in turn interacts with the server which does the work.
    So J2EE is about layered control.
    1) The client app displays info to the user and provides a means of interaction
    2) The server stands as a listening device that sends messages to the correct part of the app and back to the user.
    2) 1) The Servlets act as a control mechanism that runs the business logic (work)
    2) 2) Other layers may handle data access and storage (databases, XML. EJBs?)
    2) 3) Other layers may handle dispaly generation (JSPs) or return information (JMS)
    The advantage is that your work is done in one place. Everyone who uses the app doesn't need to update everytime the application does. Every user doesn't need to have a DB on their computer. Users can communicate and share information more efficiently. At the same time no user gains access to someone else's data because the data storage and access is twice removed from the client...

  • Migrating my development platform from J2SE to J2EE

    Context: Windows 2003 Server Edition
    I downloaded and installed J2SE 5.0. Now I want to download J2EE 5.0 to get into some serious application development.
    Should|Must I remove|uninstall J2SE first or can I just download and install J2EE over J2SE?
    Does it make sense to have both coexisting on my server/development machine?
    Thanks
    Jim

    this is not an exlusive-or situation.
    you will develop j2ee apps using j2se code and j2ee code.
    do not uninstall j2se :)

  • Web as ABAP and J2EE Documentation

    Hi!
    Guys, I dont find documentation for installation web as ABAP and J2EE with Remote Database (ORACLE 10G)
    My OS is based Windows 64 bit x86.
    Somebody Help-me ??
    regards.
    HMattos.

    Hi,
    All installation info should be in service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202&_SHORTKEY=01100035870000659894&
    Eddy

  • MacOS X and J2EE, anyone?

    Does anyone has experience in developering J2SE 1.4 and J2EE on MacOS X?
    I'm looking forward to change my OS to OS X and wondering if I can start coding right out of the box.
    Thank you very much in advance,
    LoCal

    There is currently no release of J2SE 1.4 for Mac OSX, at least not the last time I looked. You of course could ue the latest and greated J2SE 1.3 from Apple along with JBoss, Orion, or most any other pure Java J2EE server.

  • Having a problem with wireless connection. On my Windows XP 32 bit system and a 6510 printer, initi

    On my Dell Latitude D620, Windows XP 32 bit system and my 6510 printer wireless connection (Linksys EA4500) , everything works fine after the computer is booted.  After a period of time (usually overnight), I lose connection to the printer (the scanner icon with a red x is shown on my Windows task bar and I can't print.  Ran Windows Fix and the HP fix programs.  The only thing that solves it is to reboot the computer.  A second symptom is that my IE8 stops connecting to the internet at the same time (gives a 'waiting for' response that never changes).  Firefox still connects OK when this is happening.  So I suspect the problem isn't with the printer, but with my Windows set up.  It is a fresh XP SP3 install (hard drive crashed, but it happened before also).  I reset IE, checked my proxy, no malware, happens with or without firewalls and security programs.
    Hoping that someone else has run into this problem.  Been all over Google, and the IE doesn't work / Firefox works is fairly common, but none of the fixes helps. 

    If you want you can reload Firefox 4.0 or the last "old" version is 3.6.16 and is available here:
    http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
    Just reinstall your choice of FF. The bookmarks are in a different directory and are NOT overwritten. Some of the Add-ons that worked in 3.6 DO NOT work with 4.0, pay attention and head any warnings when you start 4.0.
    I had to disable extensions: Flashblock and WOT
    Firefox SafeMode? - A troubleshooting mode.
    1.You can open the Firefox 4.0 SafeMode by holding the Shft key when you use the Firefox desktop or Start menu shortcut.
    To exit the Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before using the Firefox shortcut to open it again.
    For more help, see this: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
    Hope this helps you out.
    Feedback is appreciated especially if this helps you out.

  • When will Firefox offer a 64-bit version ? I use my 32-bit Firefox,but keep my 64-bit Waterfox and Pale Moon ready, when Firefox crashes on Windows 8.

    I am a Firefox Veteran. Been around since the NCSA web browser days and used the first Firefox web browsers. I have never liked or trusted Microsoft Windows, so I've never used Internet Explorer. I had tweaked Windoze Blue Screen Of Death software from the Windows 3.0 days and did minor maintenance on the "Pizza Boxes" to keep them alive until I or my duty station could afford a newer one. Firefox has always performed for me working for "Uncle Sam" or at home. I keep Firefox and the versions: Sea Monkey, Aurora, Nightly on my laptop because I like Firefox and I like to switch from one browser to the other sometimes -- plus, in a Windows crash, I have a backup browser. Windows always "Crashes"; somethings never change. My 32-bit Firefox doesn't seem as reliable on my 64-bit 'Windoze' 8 as it was on Windows 7. My hope is that some of the Firefox Gurus have a 64-bit Firefox up on blocks in the shed out back ready to rock and roll or at least release as experimental to be played with and tested. Thanks guys -- Keep up the good work. Sam

    Someday. This is a question asked multiple times but the answer is always the same, there is no real benefit to moving to 64 bit Firefox, and the amount of work required to do something with no benefit makes this a low priority. Eventually it will happen, but just because it uses 64bit doesn't magically make things better.

  • Vista 64 bit OS and iTunes

    I am getting an error message when initializing iTunes.
    iTunes was not properly installed. If you wish to import or burn CD's
    you need to reinstall iTunes.
    I uninstalled, cleaned the reg, and reloaded a few times.
    Diagnostic DVD/CD test results "Upper Filter Status Failed" (no CD Rom Driver found)
    All seems to be working ok otherwise and CD's seem to be importing OK
    Bud
    Message was edited by: idraliv

    iTunes doesn't officially support 64 bit Windows and the 64 bit Gear drivers you need for burning arn't supplied. You can download them from here:
    http://www.gearsoftware.com/support/drivers.cfm
    A number of people also had problems with the creation of the CD configuration folder, but as your iTunes is working, I guess that doesn't apply to you.

  • Really bad banding and artifacts in 16-bit layered greyscale file. Bad banding is retained when converted to 8-bit with No flattening. Flatten 16-bit image and banding and artifacts disappear even with no dither or noise layer. Is this a known bug?

    Has anyone else experienced this?
    I thought it was a monitor problem at first, but I'm using a 10-bit per channel Eizo. It seems to be a Photoshop bug based on many layers interacting with each other. When I flatten everything is fine. But I need to work on this image with layers and decent fidelity. Interestingly when I convert to 8-bit without flattening (and utilising the dither function to potentially reduce banding even further), it uses the terrible artifact laden/banding to do the conversion even though when I zoom into 1:1 in my 16-bit document it looks fine. But 50% or 25% zoom I suddenly get these awful artifacts.
    Here's some screenshots to clarify. Please note I've used Photoshop for 24 years so I'm no slouch but this is the first time I've seen this. The problem is I need to do some subtle airbrush and texture work on this and it's almost unusable unless I flatten (please note, it does the same in the original 8-bit file and just to say I Gaussian-Blurred every layer with a 30px radius after converting to 16-bit so the there's no longer any 8-bit information in there or reasons for banding/artifacts). I can only think it is some of bug in Photoshop's layering engine.
    Has anyone seen this before - dealt with this before?
    Thanks in advance.
    Not sure these embedded images will work.
    8% zoomed - see all the strange banding and triangular artifacts
    <a href="http://imgur.com/izrGuia"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/izrGuia.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    Flattened view - all smooth:
    <a href="http://imgur.com/Pn35IAK"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/Pn35IAK.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    50% zoom, still there:
    <a href="http://imgur.com/Z207hFd"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/Z207hFd.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    100% artifacts disappear:
    <a href="http://imgur.com/6aGOz0V"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/6aGOz0V.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    100% 16-bit layered
    <a href="http://imgur.com/0XJfe5e"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/0XJfe5e.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    and finally 8-bit layered converted from 16-bit with dither.
    <a href="http://imgur.com/PSxiu43"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/PSxiu43.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a>
    help!

    I can't speak to why, perhaps someone more knowledgeable than I can speak to that.   But if it only happens at certain views then it's purely a display issue; it won't happen in print or when you downsample to display size.  Such banding issues have always disappeared for me when I output to 8 bit.
    I'd assume that it's because of your monitor; it can't display all the colors and when zoomed out there's too wide of a range in a small area so banding occurs.  But that's just my guess.

Maybe you are looking for