7110 OMG, CIF and NFS permission woes. I'm tired and I want to go home.

OK, here's the dealio...
I have share exported via CIFS and NFS from our 7110 array running 2010.02.09.2.1,1-1.18
I have AD configured for CIFS Authentication.
I have a UNIX desktop so I am using SMB authenticate via AD and talk to the CIF share on the array.
I have the NFS share mounted using vers 3 on Solaris 10.
Now, the problem..........
PERMISSIONS!!!
Here’s what I want to do,
Create a file or folder on the CIF and preserve the username on NFS.
Example, I login as myself via AD, bam I’m on the array.
Create a file.
Check the ownership of the file on the NFS mount and it’s suddenly become a series of numbers. Of which I assume are taken from my Windows SID. As Solaris can’t relate my SID to a UNIX username I’m left out in the dark.
So, I then tried to set up some rule based identity mapping so my Windows login would be converted to my UNIX username, no luck still a series of numbers for me listed against my files.
I could work around this if I could chown but I can’t even do that as it says chown: filename: Not owner
What gives? How do I keep my username from CIFS to NFS? HELP!!!!

Did you have any joy with this?
I have never been able to determine a consistent configuration for NFS/CIFS sharing on a 7310. Ended up opening access to all on the NFS side (v4) and the CIFS just worked out of the box.
I am using ID Mapping, with IDMU first, then rule based mapping next. The box picks up the correct UID/GID from AD but doesn't always inherit the user & group for the NFS side.
Chris

Similar Messages

More permission woes...pacman and dbus

hi again, i'm not sure if i should have put this in my other thread or not but here goes...
id recently managed to screw up a lot of permissions on a lot of the major directories with thunar. And after some advice in this forum managed to save myself from doing a reinstall with 'chmod 755 /var /etc /lib64 /boot /root /usr and /bin'. Now, i'm weeding through the various file permissions as and when they appear. I seem to be having problems with dbus when i'm using fwbackups
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Crypto/Hash/SHA.py:6: DeprecationWarning: the sha module is deprecated; use the hashlib module instead
from sha import *
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Crypto/Hash/MD5.py:6: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
from md5 import *
(fwbackups-runapp.pyw:4893): GVFS-RemoteVolumeMonitor-WARNING **: invoking IsSupported() failed for remote volume monitor with dbus name org.gtk.Private.GduVolumeMonitor: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ChildSignaled: Process /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor received signal 6
so i tried a reinstall of dbus, which gave me the following error
checking package integrity...
(1/1) checking for file conflicts [#####################] 100%
(1/1) upgrading dbus [#####################] 100%
warning: directory permissions differ on etc/X11/
filesystem: 775 package: 755
warning: directory permissions differ on etc/X11/xinit/
filesystem: 775 package: 755
Since i messed with the directory permissions, and did the chmod 755, this has been happening with a lot of things ive tried to install. As you can probably guess i really don't have much of a clue whats goin on, any help would be greatly appreciated

never mind, i've come to the conclusion it'll be quicker to sort this out by doing a complete reinstall.

How to set userlevel permission for GFS and NFS

hi
how to set userlevel permission for GFS and NFS?
regards

hi
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/
AND
http://en.tldp.org/
probably your best bet.
regards

Slow ZFS-share performance (both CIFS and NFS)

Hello,
After upgrading my OpenSolaris file server (newest version) to Solaris 11 Express, the read (and write)-performance on my CIFS and NFS-shares dropped from 40-60MB/s to a few kB/s. I upgraded the ZFS filesystems to the most recent version as well.
dmsg and /var/log/syslog doesn't list anything abnormal as far as I can see.. I'm not running any scrubs on the zpools, and they are listed as online. top doesn't reveal any process utilizing the CPU more than 0.07%.
The problem is probably not at the client side, as the clients are 100% untouched when it comes to configuration.
Where should I start looking for errors (logs etc.)? Any recommended diagnostic tools?
Best regards,
KL

Hi!
Check Link speed.
dladm show-dev
Check for collisions and wrong network packets:
netstat -ia
netstat -ia 2 10 ( when file transfered)
Check for lost packets :
ping -s <IP client> ( whait more 1 min )
Check for retransmit, latency for respond:
snoop -P -td <IP client> ( when file transfered)
Try replace network cable.
Regards.

Software to configure CIFS and NFS on AWS?

Does anybody have experience with software that will configure CIFS and NFS on Amazon Web Services (AWS)?

I suggest that you post this question in an AWS community forum available there : https://forums.aws.amazon.com/index.jspa

[SOLVED] Netbooting with PXE, TFTP and NFS / Numerous errors

Greetings all, hope you can help me out.
Been given a task by my company of making a network bootable ICA client (with X and Firefox, with the Citrix ICA client installed) as small as possible to minimize network traffic (as 440 workstations would be downloading the end-product simultaneously, so it'd beat ten bells of proverbial out of the core and edge switches for a little while). I discovered two options. One being to integrate everything in side a cloop image directly inside the INITRD. I have stacks of working INITRDs with their matched kernels yet being my first dabble in to extracting the INITRD, my faffing with CPIO has resulted in me nuking my base layout (Thank god for snapshotting in VMware Workstation!) 4 times, and either getting "Premature end of file" or a copius amount of lines stating "cpio: Malformed Number: <strange characters>" finally ending with "Premature end of file". As a result I went in search of another option, which would be booting off an NFS share. I followed the guide:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dis … t_NFS_root
...in order to set up a network booted install of Arch and hit a few snags along the way, probably a result of using multiple operating systems for the TFTP and NFS server as opposed to using what the guide recommends, but I'm not sure as these seem solvable, although I don't know how right now.
The set up:
DHCP is provided by a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 VM (AD Integrated) on 172.16.10.17 on a box called "Rex".
TFTP is provided by another Windows Server 2003 VM by "TFTPd32" which is a free download. This is located on 172.16.10.158 on a box called "Terra".
The NFS store is provided by OpenFiler 2.3 which is a specialized version of rPath Linux designed specifically for turning boxes in to dedicated NAS stores. This is located on 172.16.10.6, and is called "frcnet-nas-1".
The problem:
DHCP is correctly configured with a Boot Host Name (Which is 172.16.10.158) and a boot file name of "pxelinux.0". This is confirmed as working.
Client gets the kernel and INITRD from TFTP and boots up fine until it hits "Waiting for devices to settle..." by which point it echos out "Root device /dev/nfs doesn't exist, attempting to create it...", which it seems to do so fine. It then passes control over to kinit and echos "INIT: version 2.86 booting" and the archlinux header, and immediately after that it prints:
mount: only root can do that
mount: only root can do that
mount: only root can do that
/bin/mknod: '/dev/null': File exists
/bin/mknod: '/dev/zero': File exists
/bin/mknod: '/dev/console': File exists
/bin/mkdir: cannot create directory '/dev/pts': File exists
/bin/mkdir: cannot create directory '/dev/shm': File exists
/bin/grep: /proc/cmdline: No such file or directory
/etc/rc.sysinit: line 72: /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug: No such file or directory
:: Using static /dev filesystem [DONE]
:: Mounting Root Read-only [FAIL]
:: Checking Filesystems [BUSY]
/bin/grep: /proc/cmdline: No such file or directory
:: Mounting Local Filesystems
mount: only root can do that
mount: only root can do that
mount: only root can do that
[DONE]
:: Activating Swap [DONE]
:: Configuring System Clock [DONE]
:: Removing Leftover Files [DONE]
:: Setting Hostname: myhost [DONE]
:: Updating Module Dependencies [DONE]
:: Setting Locale: en_US.utf8 [DONE]
:: Setting Consoles to UTF-8 mode[BUSY]
/etc/rc.sysinit: line 362: /dev/vc/0: No such file or directory
/etc/rc.sysinit: line 363: /dev/vc/0: No such file or directory
/etc/rc.sysinit: line 362: /dev/vc/1: No such file or directory
/etc/rc.sysinit: line 363: /dev/vc/1: No such file or directory
... all the way down to vc/63 ...
:: Loading Keyboard Map: us [DONE]
INIT: Entering runlevel: 3
:: Starting Syslog-NG [DONE]
Error opening file for reading; filename='/proc/kmsg', error='No such file or directory (2)'
Error initializing source driver; source='src'
:: Starting Network...
Warning: cannot open /proc/net/dev (No such file or directory). Limited output.
eth0: dhcpcd 4.0.3 starting
eth0: broadcasting inform for 172.16.10.154
eth0: received approval for 172.16.10.154
eth0: write_lease: Permission denied
:: Mounting Network Filesystems
mount: only root can do that
[FAIL]
:: Starting Cron Daemon [DONE]
...and, nothing after that, it just stops. Kernel doesn't panic, and hitting ctrl+alt+delete does what you'd expect, a clean shutdown minus a few errors about filesystems not being mounted. It seems /proc isn't getting mounted because init apparently doesn't have the appropriate permissions, and /proc not being mounted causes a whole string of other issues. Thing is, proc gets created at boot time as it contains kernel specific information about the system and the kernel's capabilities, right? Why can't it create it? How come init doesn't have the same privileges as root as it usually would, and how would I go about fixing it?
I admit, while I'm fairly competent in Linux, this one has me stumped. Anyone have any ideas?
Last edited by PinkFloydYoshi (2008-11-22 12:29:01)

The idea behind the Windows DHCP and TFTP is that we'd be using an existing server and a NetApp box with NFS license to serve everything off. I would have loved to make a new server which is completely Linux, but my boss, nor the other technician have ever used Linux so if I left for any reason, they'd be stuck if ever they ran in to trouble, which is why I've struggled to get Linux to penetrate our all Windows infrastructure.
During my hunting around on Google I found a lot of information on making my own initrd, and a lot of it using all manner of switches. I can make them fine, but I figure that I would need to look at extracting the current working one first, adding X, Firefox and the ICA client to it, then compressing it again. Cloop came about when I was looking at DSL's internals. The smaller the initrd, the better, so utilizing this could possibly be a plus too.
The reason I'm doing this with Archlinux is that I know Arch's internals quite well (and pacman is just wonderous, which is more than I can say for yum), so if I run in to a small problem I'm more likely to fix it without consulting Google. Fair enough though, the NFS booting method is giving me issues I never thought were possible. Ahh, sods law strikes again.
Addendum: I've noticed something which struck me as odd. Files in the NFS share are somehow owned by 96:scanner instead of root:root. Upon attempting changing, it's telling me "Operation Not Permitted". Further prodding has led me to believe it's an Openfiler thing where GID/UID 96 on the OpenFiler box is "ofgroup"/"ofguest". Chowning / to root:root puts NFS boot right ahead and gives me a prompt, however I cannot log in as root. I've also discovered that chrooting in to the base from my Arch workstation and creating a directory makes the directory owned by ofgroup:ofguest again, so it's an Openfiler thing after all this time. Prodding further.
Addendum two: For anyone using Openfiler out there, when you allow guest access to the NFS share, be sure to set the Anonymous GID and Anonymous UID to 0. By default it's 96 and as a result when trying to boot you get the errors I experienced. This is insecure and you should use some sort of network/host/ip range restriction. Because the root filesystem has 96:96 as the owner of everything after you install the base layout using pacman (and any changes you make afterward) init and root no longer have the appropriate permissions, user 96:96 (which is "scanner" in Archlinux) has the permissions instead and init, in order to complete boot would need to be "scanner" in order to boot completely.
Solution is to set Anon GID and Anon UID to 0, chown the entire diskless root filesystem to root, then use a linux desktop to mount the diskless root filesystem, mount /proc, /sys and mount bind /dev, then chroot in to the diskless root filesystem. At this point to clear up any problems with bad passwords, use passwd to change your password. Exit the chroot environment then unmount the diskless proc, sys and dev. Boot up via the network and use your chosen password to log in as root. At this point, start clearing up permissions from the en masse filesystem chown and you should then have a usable diskless root.
I'll experiment further and clear up some of the remaining permission errors that occured during boot and report on my progress in fixing it. Didn't like the idea of chowning the entire share as root. :S
Last edited by PinkFloydYoshi (2008-11-21 19:28:15)

Cups out and nfs no go maybe related ?

Hey there,
i am having the devil of a time getting a couple of things to work.
first off is cups. I installed cups and hplip, put hplip and then cups in the DAEMONS array in rc.conf. tried to start them and they failed.
firefox lets me go to localhost:631 but if I try to do anything, it gives me this message
This address uses a network port which is normally used for purposes other than Web browsing. Firefox has canceled the request for your protection.
also, i cannot seem to get nfs to share a drive. I have four computers in the house, all run a version of linux ( arch and ubuntu ).
i need them all to have permission to share, write to and delete copy everything in a shared nfs folder
here is my hosts.allow
# /etc/hosts.allow
ALL: 192.168.1.1
ALL: 192.168.1.3
ALL: 192.168.1.4
# End of file
and hosts.deny
# /etc/hosts.deny
ALL: ALL: DENY
# End of file
exports
/stuff 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0(rw,sync)
/ark 192.168.1.1(rw,sync)
and my DAEMONS from rc.conf
DAEMONS=(syslog-ng network portmap nfslock nfsd netfs hplip cups crond alsa)
this is not the computer connected to the internet or my router, thats a different machine.
when i try to mount the drive from the other machine, it tells me permission denied.
are the two issues related ?
thanks for any help

Firewall?

I have an ipad mini 1st gen 64 gb (wifi only) and i have problem with some of my apps. These apps have lags when you play with them for a few seconds the apps are having lags are call of duty strike team, gta San Andreas and nfs most wanted.pleas help me

I have an ipad mini 1st gen 64 gb (wifi only) and i have problem with some of my apps. These apps have lags when you play with them for a few seconds the apps are having lags are call of duty strike team, gta San Andreas and nfs most wanted.pleas help me

I'm going to guess videos buffer for a while also...
Two possibilities, one is you should close apps on the iPad, the other is your internet speed is not able to handle the demands of a high speed device.
To close apps: Double click home button, swipe up to close the apps.
To solve internet problem, contact your provider. Basic internet is not enough for video games and movies. Your router may be old and slow.

HT5654 I have a new computer, Windows 8. My old laptop died and I used to Sync my iPad and iPhone on that device. Now I want to update, the new computer states that I do not have permission. How do i change permissions to this new computer?

I have a new computer, Windows 8. My old laptop died and I used to Sync my iPad and iPhone on that device. Now I want to update, the new desktop computer states that I do not have permission. How do I change permissions to this new computer?

Did you authorize it?

New files and folders on a Linux client mounting a Windows 2012 Server for NFS share do not inherit Owner and Group when SetGID bit set

Problem statement
When I mount a Windows NFS service file share using UUUA and set the Owner and Group, and set the SetGID bit on the parent folder in a hierarchy. New Files and folders inside and underneath the parent folder do not inherit the Owner and Group permissions
of the parent.
I am given to understand from this Microsoft KnowledgeBase article (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/951716/en-gb) the problem is due to the Windows implmentation of NFS Services not supporting the Solaris SystemV or BSD grpid "Semantics"
However the article says the same functionality can acheived by using ACE Inheritance in conjunction with changing the Registry setting for "KeepInheritance" to enable Inheritance propagation of the Permissions by the Windows NFS Services.
1. The Precise location of the "KeepInheritance" DWORD key appears to have "moved" in Windows Server 2012 from a Services path to a Software path, is this documented somewhere? And after enabling it, (or creating it in the previous
location) the feature seems non-functional. Is there a method to file a Bug with Microsoft for this Feature?
2. All of the references on demonstrating how to set an ACE to achieve the same result "currently" either lead to broken links on Microsoft technical websites, or are not explicit they are vague or circumreferential. There are no plain Examples.
Can an Example be provided?
3. Is UUUA compatible with the method of setting ACE to acheive this result, or must the Linux client mount be "Mapped" using an Authentication source. And could that be with the new Flat File passwd and group files in c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc
and is there an Example available.
Scenario:
Windows Server 2012 Standard
File Server (Role)
+- Server for NFS (Role) << -- installed
General --
Folder path: F:\Shares\raid-6-array
Remote path: fs4:/raid-6-array
Protocol: NFS
Authentication --
No server authentication
+- No server authentication (AUTH_SYS)
++- Enable unmapped user access
+++- Allow unmapped user access by UID/GID
Share Permissions --
Name: linux_nfs_client.host.edu
Permissions: Read/Write
Root Access: Allowed
Encoding: ANSI
NTFS Permissions --
Type: Allow
Principal: BUILTIN\Administrators
Access: Full Control
Applies to: This folder only
Type: Allow
Principal: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM
Access: Full Control
Applies to: This folder only
-- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

I'm making some "major" progress on this problem.
1. Apparently the "semantics" issue to honor SGID or grpid in NFS on the server side or the client side has been debated for some time. It also existed as of 2009 between Solaris nfs server and Linux nfs clients. The Linux community defaulted to declaring
it a "Server" side issue to avoid "Race" conditions between simultaneous access users and the local file system daemons. The client would have to "check" for the SGID and reformulate its CREATE request to specify the Secondary group it would have to "notice"
by which time it could have changed on the server. SUN declined to fix it.. even though there were reports it did not behave the same between nfs3 vs nfs4 daemons.. which might be because nfs4 servers have local ACL or ACE entries to process.. and a new local/nfs
"inheritance" scheme to worry about honoring.. that could place it in conflict with remote access.. and push the responsibility "outwards" to the nfs client.. introducing a race condition, necessitating "locking" semantics.
This article covers that discovery and no resolution - http://thr3ads.net/zfs-discuss/2009/10/569334-CR6894234-improved-sgid-directory-compatibility-with-non-Solaris-NFS-clients
2. A much Older Microsoft Knowledge Based article had explicit examples of using Windows ACEs and Inheritance to "mitigate" the issue.. basically the nfs client "cannot" update an ACE to make it "Inheritable" [-but-] a Windows side Admin or Windows User
[-can-] update or promote an existing ACE to "Inheritable"
Here are the pertinent statements -
"In Windows Services for UNIX 2.3, you can use the KeepInheritance registry value to set inheritable ACEs and to make sure that these ACEs apply to newly created files and folders on NFS shares."
"Note About the Permissions That Are Set by NFS Clients
The KeepInheritance option only applies ACEs that have inheritance enabled. Any permissions that are set by an NFS client will
only apply to that file or folder, so the resulting ACEs created by an NFS client will
not have inheritance set."
"So
If you want a folder's permissions to be inherited to new subfolders and files, you must set its permissions from the Windows NFS server because the permissions that are set by NFS clients only apply to the folder itself."
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321049
3. I have set up a Windows 2008r2 NFS server and mounted it with a Redhat Enteprise Linux 5 release 10 x86_64 server [Oct 31, 2013] and so far this does appear to be the case.
4. In order to mount and then switch user to a non-root user to create subdirectories and files, I had to mount the NFS share (after enabling Anonymous AUTH_SYS mapping) this is not a good thing, but it was because I have been using UUUA - Unmapped Unix
User Access Mapping, which makes no attempt to "map" a Unix UID/GID set by the NFS client to a Windows User account.
To verify the Inheritance of additional ACEs on new subdirectories and files created by a non-root Unix user, on the Windows NFS server I used the right click properties, security tab context menu, then Advanced to list all the ACEs and looked at the far
Column reflecting if it applied to [This folder only, or This folder and Subdirectories, or This folder and subdirectories and files]
5. All new Subdirectories and files createdby the non-root user had a [Non-Inheritance] ACE created for them.
6. I turned a [Non-Inheritance] ACE into an [Inheritance] ACE by selecting it then clicking [Edit] and using the Drop down to select [This folder, subdirs and files] then I went back to the NFS client and created more subdirs and files. Then back to the
Windows NFS server and checked the new subdirs and folders and they did Inherit the Windows NFS server ACE! - However the UID/GID of the subdirs and folders remained unchanged, they did not reflect the new "Effective" ownership or group membership.
7. I "believe" because I was using UUUA and working "behind" the UID/GID presentation layer for the NFS client, it did not update that presentation layer. It might do that "if" I were using a Mapping mechanism and mapped UID/GID to Windows User SIDs and
Group SIDs. Windows 2008r2 no longer has a "simple" Mapping server, it does not accept flat text files and requires a Schema extension to Active Directory just to MAP a windows account to a UID/GID.. a lot of overhead. Windows Server 2012 accepts flat text
files like /etc/passwd and /etc/group to perform this function and is next on my list of things to see if that will update the UID/GID based on the Windows ACE entries. Since the Local ACE take precedence "over" Inherited ACEs there could be a problem. The
Inheritance appears to be intended [only] to retain Administrative rights over user created subdirs and files by adding an additional ACE at the time of creation.
8. I did verify from the NFS client side in Linux that "Even though" the UID/GID seem to reflect the local non-root user should not have the ability to traverse or create new files, the "phantom" NFS Server ACEs are in place and do permit the function..
reconciling the "view" with "reality" appears problematic, unless the User Mapping will update "effective" rights and ownership in the "view"
-- John Willis, Facebook: John-Willis, Skype: john.willis7416

I smashed my screen to sent it to a phone shop to be repaired and he obviously reset it and my imessage said waiting for activation and I entered my password wrong and it won't let me retry and it says the same thing omg please help

I smashed my screen to sent it to a phone shop to be repaired and he obviously reset it and my imessage said waiting for activation and I entered my password wrong and it won't let me retry and it says the same thing omg please help

Troubleshooting FaceTime and iMessage Activation

I cannot update from OS 10.9.4 to 10.9.5. I get a message saying: File couldn't be installed error (513). I have configured my OS so that I have read and write permission followed by system with read and writ permission. Can someone help me? Thanks.

I cannot update from OS X 10.9.4 t0 10.9.5> Whenever I try I get the following message: File couldn't be installed error (513) and something about not having the proper permission. Under the Macintosh HD sharing and permissions settings I have customized the settings so that (Me) has read and write permission followed by the system with read and write permission, wheel and everyone have Read permissions.
I have no problems updating apps such as Adobe CC or iTunes but cannot update the operating system, can someone help me? Thanks.

1. Restart the computer in safe mode. Certain caches maintained by the system will be rebuilt.
Safe mode is much slower to start up than normal. The next normal startup may also be somewhat slow.
When the login screen appears, restart as usual (not in safe mode) and test. There's no need to log in while in safe mode.
Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the startup volume is a software RAID, you can’t start in safe mode. In that case, go to Step 2.
If there's no change after taking this step, continue.
2. Back up all data before proceeding.
Triple-click anywhere in the line below on this page to select it:
/var/folders
Right-click or control-click the highlighted line and select
Services ▹ Reveal in Finder (or just Reveal)
from the contextual menu.* A folder should open with an item named "folders" selected. Move the selected item to the Trash. You may be prompted for your administrator login password. Restart the computer and empty the Trash.
*If you don't see the contextual menu item, copy the selected text to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. In the Finder, select
Go ▹ Go to Folder...
from the menu bar and paste into the box that opens by pressing command-V. You won't see what you pasted because a line break is included. Press return.

Configure security-role and method permission for EJB 3.0 using Jdev 11g

The EJB 3.0 session bean created by Jdev 11g EJB wizard does not have ejb-jar.xml. Where and how can security-role and method permission for the EJB be configured?
For example,
<assembly-descriptor>
<security-role>
<role-name>managers</role-name>
</security-role>
<method-permission>
<role-name>managers</role-name>
<method>
<ejb-name>Employees</ejb-name>
<method-name>setSalary</method-name>
<method-params>
<method-param>java.lang.Long</method-param>
</method-params>
</method>
</method-permission>
</assembly-descriptor>

user516954,
By default annotations are used. However, you can create a new descriptor and that will take presidence over any declared annotation.
--Ric

Package the book with loan and buy permission

Jim,
I am able to package the book with buy permission by acs4 webservices. Now i want to package the book with loan permission also at same time so that book could be available for borrow also instead of buy.
Please assite me what addition parameter I have to add into packaging xml.
Mangal

Thanks for quick reply,
Please clear my following points....
Point 1:
<available>5</available>
It means distributor is able to lend only 5 books at a time. Is it right? I think distributor should be able to lend out all the books available in their inventory at a time. How we will define that distributor will able to lend out any number of books from their inventory at a time.
Point 2:
How we will define that at a time only one person could lend a perticular book. I mean two reader could not subscribe a perticluar book at a time?
Point 3:
I always think what is the need of this loan permissions though we can timed the book which have buy permissions. Please explain me what exactly the difference between buy and loan permissions.
Mangal

Deadlocking issue with sshfs and nfs

Okay, I've used both sshfs and nfs for remotely accessing the home partition on my fileserver, but I have been having a problem where the networking on the server suddenly cuts out. Any processes that are accessing the folder I mounted nfs/sshfs with become deadlocked. Any processes that try access my home directory, where the remote folder sits, are also deadlocked. I cannot get into the machine with ssh. I have to manually reboot it in order to get any networking at all.
I have to also force-kill any known processes that are accessing the remote folder, and if I don't know what they are, I have to forcibly unmount it. This issue has been occuring with this specific fileserver since I got it. It is running Arch Linux i686, but has had the same problem with the server editions of both Fedora and Ubuntu.
I don't know where to begin with fixing this problem, nor do I know how to diagnose it.

Consider "soft" mount option for NFS.

7110 OMG, CIF and NFS permission woes. I'm tired and I want to go home.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for